HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Bill 6.A 09/13/2010~ p' L U,rLj.
a '~
Ig58
~l~endc~ Itev-v #6.~t
DATE: September 13, 2010
TO: Honorable Mayor and'Mernbers of the City Council through City Manager
FROM: Geoff Bradley, Planning Manager '~
SUBJECT: Resolutions to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting;Program; to Approve or Deny a Planned Unit District
Unit Development Plan and Development Standards; and to Approve or Deny a
Vesting Tentative Map fora 19-lot Subdivision to Allow for the Construction of
Single Family Homes for the Sunnyslope II Project Located within the
Sunnyslope Planned Unit District, at 674 Sunnyslope Road, APN 019-203-008,
File # 03-TSM-0460
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council continue the item to November 15, 2010.
BACKGROUND
On February 22, 2010, the City Council considered the Sunnyslope II project. application for a
Mitigated Negative Declaration, PUD Amendment, and Vesting Tentative Map. After receiving
public comments, and following Council deliberation, the City Council continued. the item to
Apri15, 2010 in order to allow for project revisions in response to the Council's direction.
On March 16th the applicant submitted a request for continuance to the June 7, 2010 City Council
meeting to allow adequate time for revisions; additional neighborhood outreach, and staff review
and analysis. The City Council continued the item to June 7, 2010.
On May 11th the applicant submitted a subsequent request for continuance to a date uncertain,
citing disagreement about the cost recovery balance. In the interest of meeting the Council's
expectation that ahis matter be processed expeditiously, staff recommended continuance of this
item to a date certain. The City Council continued the item to August 2, 2010.
On July 12, 2010 the applicant submitted a request for continuance to September 13, 2010 due to
a long-planned family vacation. The City Council continued the item to September 13, 2010.
On August 24, 2010 the applicant submitted a subsequent request for continuance to a date
uncertain.
v-~~ea~~l~i Rey ic~~
City Attorney Finance Director ~ ~ City Ma
DISCUSSION
Staff has maintained regular communication with. the applicant's representative to stay up to date
on proposed project revisions. However, in the absence of revised. plans responsive to the
Council's direction and payment of the outstanding cost recovery balance, staff concurs that
further continuance of the item is necessary. In the interest of meeting the Council's
expectations that this matter be processed in an expeditious fashion, Staff recommends that the
project be continued to November 15, 2010 and has sent the applicant associated deadlines to
ensure continued progress along this timeline.
FINANCIAL IMPACTS
The project is subject to cost~recovery. Processing costs paid to date are approximately
$119,000. This account currently has a negative balance of $39,301.88. An additional deposit
has been requested to ensure that funds are available for remaining cost recovery work.