HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 1593 N.C.S. 12/03/1984.. ~ ,.. a - F. A ~ ' I , •
"i,
. ' ~ 11 .. ~ ,~ ' ~~i~ ~ .
,. ,~ ~µ.~, -'~' ~ I .
il~ :I . +~ ,', ~~~~~~'~~'~:~~ Y ~~.
~ ~ ~OF ~RDIRI~ANCE
~~ ~ ~ q~ - 21~5 N OV 19 1984 1 4
!~ ~ O R D I N A N C E N O'. 1 5 9 3 N. C. S.
, INTRODUCED BY COUNCILMAN SECON'DED BY COUNCILMAN
J.OHN BALSHAW VTCE.MAI'OR ROLAND BOND
° AN ORDI~NAN"GE REPEALIN.G ORDINANCE NO. 1274 N.. C. S.
AND AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE N.O:, 1072 N.G..S. BY
;. RECLASSIFYING ,A~ND REZONIN.G SUNRI5E, SUBDIVISION
FROM PUD (PLAN'NED UNIT DISTRTCT) TO
PUD (PLANNED UNIT DISTRICT)
BE IT ORDATNED by the City Council of the Gity of Petaluma a's follows:
- , .,
SECTION 1. That the City ` Coun~ci~l hereby repeals'` Ordinance No. 1@&$
N. C. S in its entirety . `
~~ .,
,~ SECTION 2. That the Ci,ty ~ Council finds that the Planning Commission
filed with the Ci;ty Gouncil ~on :September 11, 1984'," 'its report as set forth in
, its : minutes of September 11, 1984, recommending the adoption of an
amendment to Zqning Ordi-nance No. 1072 N,. C.•S. by reclassifying and
rezbnirig certaim lands, being more particularly describecl as Sunrise
Sub division .
SECTION 3. The City couneil further finds that said Planning Cornmission
held a publie hearing on,~ said proposed amendment to Zoning Ordinance No.
_ 1072 N. C. S. on September 11, 1984, after haviri_g given notice. of said
' " hearing in the manner,, for the per-iod and in the ~ form required' by sai'd
Ord'inance No. 1072 .N.C.,-S.
SECTION 4. That pursuant to the provisiqns of Zoning Ordinance No.
1072 N. C.;S;. , the. City Couneil has held a public hearirig and finds that the
proposed amendment, , is in general conformity with the .Petaluma General
Plan, and the Environmental Desigri Plan, and furtlier, that the public
interest, conv,eni'ence and general ''`welfar:e will be furthered by the proposed
amendmerit . . .
` Ord. 1593
~~~ ~ ~ ;~~ .. -.,,n
,'~ SECT:ION 5. That pursuant ta 5ection 1:9A-3'00 . A through D of said
.t-~ ,• ~ Zonin.g Ordinance No. 1072 N. C.S. ,, the City CounciI further finds as
" foll'ows:
a. Said plan clearly. results in a more desirable use of land and a
better physical environment than would 'be possible under any
` single zoning district or combination of zoning districts.
b. That any P, U. D.'Di~strict is proposed on property which has a
suitable r,elationship to one (1) or more thoroughfares; and that
~~.
said thorou"ghfares are adequate to carry ,any additional traffic
generated by the development.
c. That the plan :for t-he proposed `development ~presents a. unified
~ ~ ~~ , ,
and organized, arrangement of buildirigs and service facilities
~
which are appropriate in relation ,to: adjacent or riearby properties
, ~ ,
and that adequate ~landscaping,, and/or screening is included if
necessary to insure compatibili~ty.
d. That the natural and scenic qualities qf the site are protected,
with adequate available public and private spaces designated on
the Unit Development Plan.
e. That the development of the subjeet prqperty, in the manner
proposed by th'e applicant,, will .not be detrimental to the public
. welfare, will be in the best interests of :the City and will be in
keeping with~ the general intent and spirit of the zoning
~ regulation of the City of Petaluma, with the Petaluma General
Plan, and with: any applicable Environmental Design Plans adopted
by tfie City .
SEC.T~ION 6. That pur:suant to the provisions of Zoning Ordinance No.
1072 N. G. S., and based upon the. evidence it `has received and in
accordance ~ with the findings made, . the City Counail hereby adopts an
amendment to said Zoning Ordinance No. 1`0`72 N. C. S. , so as to reclassify
"' ° , ORD. '15~3 NCS 2 of 3
~~ .,G~ ~~ ~ ,
~ ~ ' r. ii.~ . .i
,. ~ . ~, ui ' ' , ~ .
',^' "_' and rezone said property hereinbefore 'descr.ibed from PUD (Planned Unit
f' . Distriet) to PUD (Planned; Unit District) .
~ ,
~ S:ECTIO:N 7. The City Council finds that the requirements of California
Environmental Quality Guidelines have b'een satisfied and hereby
incorporatecl by referencing the previously 'certified Environmental Impact
Report for the project. ,
5ECTION 8. The City ~Glerk is hereby directed . tq post/~~ this
ordinance for the period an'd in the manner required by the City Charter.
INTRODUCED and ordered posted/~~l~l~~~ this lgt,h da~y Novemb;eh~84•
ADOPTED this 3rd day ~oi~ecember1984 by the' following vote:
- .~~
, AYES: Battaglia, Tencer., Cavanagh, Balshaw, Mayor Mattei
~ NOES: None
ABSENT: perry, Vi~ce~ Mayor Bond' ~
„ `~~~~ ~
~
Mayor
,i ~APPROVED •
it~ ~ At~torney~ ~ - ~
ordinance .•park . place . I
reso '
~ ~ ~~ .. ~ ° ,.
Ord. 1593