Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 1590 N.C.S. 10/01/1984r , • - - , ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~ i~F ~R~I~A~~~ ~ ~ ~~' 2 8 1984 ORDINANCE NO. 1590 INTRODUCED BY VICE MAYOR ROLAND BOND N.C.S. SF.CONDED BY COUNCILMAN ALBERT BATTAGLIA AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE Nn. 1222 N.C.S. AND Ab~ENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 1072 N.C.S. BY RECLASSIFYING AND REZONING PARK PLACE SUBDIVISION iJNIT I FROM PCD (PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT TO PUD (PLANNED UNIT DISTRICT) (QANTAS) BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Petaluma as follows: SECTION 1. That the City Council hereby repeals Ord.inance No. 1222 N. C. S in its entirety . SECTION 2. That the City Council find.s that the Planning, . Commission filed with the City Council on September 11, 1984, its report as set forth in its minutes of September 11, 1984, recommending the adoption of an amendment to Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S. by reclassifying and rezoning certain lands being more particularly described as Park Place Unit I. SECTION 3. The City council further finds that said Planning Commission held a public hearing on said proposed amendment to Zoninp Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S. on September 11, ].984, after having given notice of said hearing in the manner, for the period and in the form required by said Ordinance No . 1072 N. C. S. SECTION 4. That pursuant to the provisions of Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 N. C. S., the City Council has held a public hearin~ and finds that the proposed amendment, is in general conformity with the Petaluma General Plan, and the Environmental Design Plan, and further, that the public interest, convenience and general welfare will be furthered by the proposed amendment. Ord. 1590 NCS 1 i_ .. . . SECTION 5. That pursuant to Section 19A-300 A through D of said Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S., the City Council further finds as follows : a. Said plan clearly results in a more desirable use of land and a better physical environment than would be possible un~er any single zoning district or combination of zoning districts. b. That any P. U. D, District is proposed on property which has a suitable relationship to one (1) or more thorou ghfares ; and that said thoroughfares are adequate to carry any additional traffic generated by the development. c. That the plan for the proposed development presents a unified and organized arrangement of buildings and service facilities which ar. e appropriate in relation to adjacent or nearby properties and that adequate landscaping and/or screening is included if necessary to insure compatibility. d. That the natural and scenic qualities of the site are protected, with adequate available public and private spaces designated on the Unit Development Plan . e. That the development of the subject property, in the manner proposed by the applicant, will not be detrimental to the public welfare, will be in the best interests of the City and will be in keeping with the general intent and spirit of the zoning regulation of the City of Petaluma, with the Petaluma General Plan, and with any applicable Environmental Design Plans adopted by the City. Ord. 1590 NCS 2 ~ ~ • • . ~ SECTION 6. That pursuant to the provisions of Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 N. C. S., and based upon the evidence it has received and in accordance with the f.indings made, the City Council hereby adopts an amendment to said Zonin g Ordinance No . 1072 N. C. S., so as to reclassify and rezone said property hereinbef.ore described from PCD (Planned Community District) to PUD (Planned Unit District) . SECTION 7. The City Council finds that the requirements of California Environmental Quality Guidelines have been satisfied and hereby incorporated by referencing the previously certified Fnvironmental Impact Report for the project. SECTION 8. The City Clerk is hereby directed to post/~~~~}~ this ordinance for the period and in the manner required. by the City Charter. INTRODUCED and ordered. posted/~{~l~slhi~~ this 15th ciay October , 1984. ADOPTED this 29th day of October , 1984 by the following vote: AYES: Battaglia, Tencer, Cavanagh, Lalshaw, Mayor 14~attei NOES : None ABSENT: Perry, Vice Mayor Bond /O w _• Mayo.r ATTEST: City Clerk APPR OVED : City Attorney or.d2 Ord. 1590 NCS 3 ` ~ ~ ' ~ -~- , . > , . .~ , euo~_ .; ' ' '~ , .-': ~ ~ , , mt~ ~ov¢~L -oou~crn~a- ~oa ~ ~ ~ ~aa~a . e o~~va ~ ~ ~ m'~ ~ ~ ~' ~ m.~: ~ ~ • e c ~ . 9~ ~ 9 n e' .~~ ~ ~ «~ ,d~ :~ ~ ~ a ~m m~ o: ~ . ~ ~ , e . ,~ ~` ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ -~B , ~ ~~ .,8 3 PeTA6Y~6- ~~ „e ' . Q ~~ Y9;~LS1' .. '"yy ~ m ~Q~J~~~l7 0 4f089fT~~, ~ , ?. ~ c: _ 4 .. .. ,.. . ..., , . . ._ . .,,.. .g .. , ~ ,. . ~, ~ „9: ~ 1 . a