HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 1531 N.C.S. 10/04/1982,' _, . ,
~ ~ .~~~~~`~~~~ ~~~~~
~ ~'"y~ ~ ra.+.!P.t p.±IJ ~ Y°
, V~' ~o .. ~ . , . ~.i ~ f
~ ~r ~s~tl6~~it~4;$~~t:+l~``4."..~
1 ~ov ~ ~ ~
ORDINANCE NO. 1531 N. C. S.
INTRODUCED BY COUNCILMAN
Jack W. Cavanagh, Jr.
SECONDED BY VICE MAYOR
William A. Perry, Jr.
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 1283 N.C.S.
AND AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 1072 N.C.S. BY
RECLASSIFYING AND REZONING A PORTION OF PARK PLACE
SUBDIVISION FROM PCD (PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT)
TO PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPNIENT FOR PHASE II (QANTAS)
BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Petaluma as follows:
Section l. That the City Council hereby repeals Ordinance No. 1283
N. C. S. in its entirety .
Section 2. That the City Council finds that the Planning Commission
filed with the City Council on February 28, 1978, its report as set forth
in its Resolution No. Z 8-78, recommending the adoption of an amendment
to Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S. by reclassifying and rezoning
certain lands being more particularly described in that map filed in Book
276 of Maps at pages 20,21,22 & 23 Sonoma County Records, Serial T
38996.
Section 3. The City Council further finds that said Planning
Commission held a public hearing on said proposed amendment to Zoning
Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S. on February 28, 1978, after having given
notice of said hearing in the manner, for the period and in the form
required by said Ordinance No. 1072 N. C. S.
Section 4. That pursuant to the provisions of Zoning Ordinance No.
1072 N. C. S. , the City Council has acted upon this matter and finds that
the proposed amendment, is in general conformity with the Petaluma
General Plan, and the Environmental Design Plan, and further, that the
public interest, convenience and general welfare will be furthered by the
proposed amendment.
Ord. No. 1531 N.C.S. Page 1 of 3
Section 5. That pursuant to Section 19A-300 A through D of said
Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 N. C. S., the City Council further finds as
follows :
a. Said plan clearly results in a more desirable use of land and a
better physical environment than would be possible under any single
zoning district or combination of zoning districts.
b. That any P. U. D. District is proposed on property which has a
suitable relationship to one (1) or more thoroughfares; and that said
thoroughfares are adequate to carry any additional traffic generated by
the development.
c. That the plan for the proposed development presents a unified
and organized arrangement of buildings and service facilities which are
appropriate in relation to adjacent or nearby properties and that adequate
landscaping and/or screening is included if necessary to insure
compatibility.
d. That the natural and scenic qualities of the site are protected,
with adequate available public and private spaces designated on the Unit
Development Plan.
e. That the development of the subject property, in the manner
proposed by the applicant, will not be detrimental to the public welfare,
will be in the best interests of the City and will be in keeping with the
general intent and spirit of the zoning regulation of the City of Petaluma,
with the Petaluma General Plan, and with any applicable Environmental
Design Plans adopted by the City.
Section b. That pursuant to the provisions of Zoni:ng Ordinance No.
1072 N. C. S. , and based upon the evidence it has received and in
accordance with the findings made, the City Council hereby adopts an
amendment to said Zoning Ordinance No. 107"L N. C. S., so as to reclassify
and rezone said property hereinbefore described from PCD (Planned
Community District) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) .
Ord. No. 1531 N.C.S. Page 2 of 3
.-
Section 7. The City Council finds that the requirements of
California Environmental Quality Guidelines have been satisfied by the
certification of the Environmental Impact Report for the Park Place
Development adopted in December 1975.
Section 8. The City Clerk is hereby directed to publish this
ordinance for the period and in the manner required by the City Charfer.
INTRODUCED and ordered published this 20th day September, 1982.
ADOPTED this 4th-'~ay of October , 198"L by the following vote:
AYES: Balshaw, Battaglia, Cavanagh, Harberson, V.M. Perry, Mayor Mattei
NOES : None
ABSENT: Bond
l//~ '
4 .~
Mayor
weds
Ord. No. 1531 N.C.S. Page 3 of 3