HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 1532 N.C.S. 10/04/1982_..__...___ . _.._
,
''EF~'EC°i"~~E D~T~E
, ti,~,~,~~;~~~
~F ~~~.~~~~~:-~.
NOV - 3 1982
ORDINANCE NO. 1532 N. C. S.
INTRODUCED BY COUNCILMAN
Jack W. Cavanagh, Jr.
SECONDED BY VICE MAYOR
V'lilliam A. Perry, Jr.
AN ORDII~IANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 1350 N.C.S.
AND AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 1072 N.C.S. BY
RECLASSIFYING AND REZONING A PORTION OF PARK PLACE
SUBDIVISIUN FROM PCD (PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT)
TO PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR PHASE III (QAr1TA5)
BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Petaluma as follows:
Section 1. That the City Council hereby repeals Ordinance No. 1350
N. C. S. in its entirety .
5ection 2. That the City Gouncil finds that the Planning Commission
filed with the City Council on January 16, 1979, its report as set forth in
its Resolution No. Z 2-79, recommending the adoption of an amendment to
Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S. by reclassifying and rezoning certain
lands being more particularly described that certain map recorded in Book
308 of Maps at page 9 Sonoma County Records, Serial 80-36998.
Section 3. The City Council further finds that said Planning
Commission held a public hearing on said proposed amendment to Zoning
Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.5. on January 16, 1979, after having given
notice of said hearing in the manner, for the period and in the form
required by said Ordinance No. 1072 N. C. S.
Section 4. That pursuant to the provisions of Zoning Ordinance No.
1072 N. C. S., the City Council has acted upon this matter and finds that
the proposed amendment, is in general conformity with the Petaluma
General Plan, and the Environmental Design Plan, and further, that the
public interest, convenience and general welfare will be furthered by the
proposed amendment.
Ord. No. 153"L N.C.S. Page 1 of 3
Section 5, That pursuant to Section 19A-300 A through D of said
Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 N. C. S. , the City Council further finds as
follows :
a. Said plan clearly results in a more desirable use of land and a
better physical environment than would be possible under any single
zoning district or combination of zoning districts.
b. That any P. U. D. District is proposed on property which has a
suitable reiationship. to one (1) or more thoroughfares; and that said
thoroughfares are adequate to carry any additional traffic gener.ated by
the development.
c. That the plan for the proposed development presents a unified
and organized arrangement of buildings and service facilities which are
appropriate in relation to adjacent or nearby properties and that adequate
lanclscaping and/or screening is included if necessary to insure
compatibility .
d. That the natural and scenic qualities of the site are protected,
with adequate available public and private spaces designated on the Unit
Development Plan.
e. That the development of the subject property, in the manner
proposed by the applicant, will not be detrimental to the public welfare,
will be in the best interests of the City and will be in keeping with the
general intent and spirit of the zoning regulation of the City of Petaluma,
with the Petaluma General Plan, and with any applicable Environmental
Design Plans adopted by the City.
Section 6. That pursuant to the provisions of Zoning Ordinance No.
1072 N. C. S., and based upon the evidence it has received and in
accordance with the findings made, the City Council hereby adopts an
amendment to said Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 N. C. S., so as to reclassify
and rezone said property hereinbefore described from PCD (Planned
Community District) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) .
Ord. No. 1532 N.C.S. Page 2 of 3
Section 7. The City Council finds that the requirements of
California Environmental Quality Guidelines have been satisfied by the
certification of the Environmental Impact Report for the Park Place
Development adopted in December 1975.
Section 8. The City Clerk is hereby directed to publish this
ordinance for the period and in the manner required by the City Charter.
INTRODUCED and ordered published this 20th day September, 1982.
ADOPTED this ~.~~_ day of October , 1982 by the following vote:
AYES: galshaw, Battaglia, Cavanagh, Harberson, V.M. Perry, Mayor Mattei
NOES: None
ABSENT: Bond
weds
n
~~
Ord. No. 1532 N.C.S. Page 3 of 3