The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutOrdinance 1483 N.C.S. 09/14/1981, , .. . PB R ORDINANCE N0. 1483 INTRODUCED BY: ~Ji 11 iam A, Perrv, Jr, SEP 4 19$1 NCS SECONDED BY: ~ James L, Hqrberson AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE 1072 NCS BY PREZONING CERTAIN LANDS TO "H" HISTORIC ZONE (Assessors Parcels #17-130-02, 04; 17-140-07, 09) AND PREZONING CERTAIN LANDS TO "A" AGRICULTURAL (Assessors Parcels #17-150-05, and a portion of 11) Location East of Lakeville Highway near Frates Road BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PETALUMA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the City Council finds that the Planning Commission filed with the City Couneil on September 8, 1981, its report as set out in its minutes of August 25, 1981, (Item No. 3.252) recommending the adoption of an amendment to Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 NCS, by prezoning certain lands, morc particularly described on the attached Exhibit "A",,.,to "H" (Historic) (Assessors Parcels #17-130-02, 04; 17-140-07, 09~ and by prezoning certain lands to "A" (Agricultural) (Assessors Parcels #17-150-05 and a portion of ]:7-150-11) (the. portion of 17-150-11 is more particularly described on Exhibit "B"). Section 2. The City Council further finds that said Planning Com- mission held a public hearing on said proposed amendment to Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 NCS on August 25, 1981, after having given notice of said hearing in the manner, for the period and in the form required by said Ordinance 1072 NCS. Section 3. That pursuant to the provisions of Zoning Ordinance 1072 NCS, the City Council finds that the proposed amendment is in general conformity with the Petaluma General Plan and the Environmental Design Plan, and further, that the public interest, convenience and general welfare will be furthered by the proposed amendment, and the findings of the Planning Commission (attached hereto as Exhibit "C" and incorporated by reference) are hereby adopted as the findings of the City Council. Ord. 1483 Paae 1 of 2 Section 4. All adverse impacts, proposed mitigation measures and alternatives to the proposed action have been addressed in the Final Environ- mental Impact Report approved by the City Council on August 24, 1981, as set forth in Resolution No. 9264 NCS, and further, that Exhibit "D", which is hereby incorporated by reference, makes the necessary findings required under Title 14 of California Administrative Code Sections15088 and 15089. Section 5. That pursuant to the provisions of Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 NCS, and based upon the evidence it has received and in accordance with the findings made, the Council hereby adopts an amendment to Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 NCS, so as to prezone said property herein to "H" (Historic) and "A" (Agricultural). Section 6. The City Clerk is hereby directed to post/publish this ordinance for the period and in the manner required by the City Charter. INTRODUCED AND ORDERED ~~6;/PUBLISHED this $tf1 day of September , 19$1. ADOPTED this 14th day of September , 1981, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen Perry, Harberson and Vice Mayor Cavanagh NOES: Councilman Balshaw ABSENT: Councilmen Bond, Battaglia and Mayo Mattei .~-~ /~` ~ . ~~ J k Cavanagh ,,J ~, V1 C2 QyOC' ATTEST : . , ~ Patricia E. Bernard, City Clerk Appr ve by City Attorney: ., ~~ ° Ord. 1483 Page 2 Of 2 . . ~ ~ ~ ~ . . ~~ . -i ~ ~~~° ~- . ~ _ . 0~7.~4C~.~~- 4.32,AC. 017•IAO•'09- 9.48 Ac. CC)111~~Y ~ ~ I . ..._. ._ - . . - ~ . :::::::::::::: : ::::~::: :: ::;:::::::::: ::::: :.: :.::.:;: :::::::::::::;:::::::~:::;:::::::::::: }~( ~ ' ...... . :~;iiiik17ik5iS~~lifl:i~:i3ii`:>~:[':~.'::<i$i<i~i?i;?i:;t~i>i;:<;i : ~ :«'i:C'1ii';: ;:; ;i :ri;`i:;~>:~>:2: • :~:::;:~:l:B:$?+!k':;:2 ~:~::;>:~:>:»:~>:~»:>::>:::<;:•::•>:;•::•>:•>: . ~:z . ~ Cuea'Dal Oro Su6division , ?i : x: `;:"'~':a`'`: : ~~ • _ r R•I •6500 ~ . 017,•030•17 s . ~ . '! ~ . 5.79 Ac. ~q e • ~ 1.'1~ ~ ~ ~ ~P•~.•D-- . CouA wood R• °' - ' 1 ~ ~' ~~0 ~~O .C9~!I,O~P ~EXIST~ING CITY LIM:TS - ~ ~ - ~ . ~~ ry ~ .Subdiweiom . . . ' . :` . Coso, De Arroyo ~ SuDtlivision ~a+'~~~ ~ . . . . _.. . . ~ ,PROP~~SEA, ,4tdN~EXATION ~ ~ ~ . :' ~~~~e ~ _AREA TO BE PREZONED 0 . ~~ ZONI.N`G LEG.EN'D 0'H' Historica( . L= 1 'S Study Disirict ~ O'A` Aqricultural ~'M•L' Lipht Indusirial ' . 0•P•C•D, Planned Cominunity DistriCt O Rd•6500SingleFdmilyDistrict O P•U•D' Plannecl Unif'D~striet ~ CountY CountYZonina QLE~tI~AMPE;R .& ASS.UCIATES CIVIL ENGINEE~2S , INC . Auc~;u5 t 18 , 19 81 • L~GAL DE'S,CRI-PTION. PARCEL H Being a porti.on of; tYi~ lands of John .a-n.d Vincen,t F-rates as described by .cie~d reco.rded in Fook 3.63~:4. o,f O,f.ficial Records at Page 77'5, S'on.onra Courity' ,Records,, and` als~o :being a portion of Lot 233 as saic~' Lot is shown on Rowe`',s :Map qf the Petaluma Rancho which is :on; r.e.cord in the o=ffi,c_e of the Sonoma County Recorcler in ~ook '8' of; Maps at Page 15°, and more particularly des cribed as fol-low;s z Commencing at a point which is called "Point F," in the deed from John and. Vincen,t Frat`es et al to the P~aci-fic Gas and Electric Compan~y,. `fo~r' .a 12'0 foot wide e;lect~ric transmission line easement, and whi;eh i:s descri:bed in Book 1991 of Official Recor.ds at Page 7Z4, S;omoma Co,unty Record_s; thence from said "Point A" and alon:g a`line; which is p`ara.llel to, and 30.00 fee.t northeasterly a_'f; th'e southwest line of said Lot 233, S.outh 54° 27 ! 05" Eas;t 6:0..00 feet :to the True Point of Begin- n; n c-~ f+- r ~ ~ • . .,----`~ .. . ~_,.~ ~~c:ii v~,::::..~ ~.r~i:;'l'31i~U Z'~~i ,~" . . '.C7E,' E . ;~ ~ Thence `.from said T;rue Paint of Beginni-ng,, i1'orth 3510 42' 00" East 1621.26 fee:t ~along; the southeast line of s:aid 120 foot wide easemerit to t'he Northeast line o-f said ,Lot 233; thence along the northeas~t ]_ine of sa°id Lo~t 2.33, and Lot 234 as shown, on Rowe"s M'ap :of tYie Petalum,-a -Rancho ('8 .Maps 15 Sonoma Coun~ty Records:) , So.u.th ~54° 30' 27" E,ast,, 224°:0::10 feet more or 1es.s to t~l~e most e,asterly corner o,f~ :s~aid lands of Frates ( 3.634 O. R. 775,) ; tihence alonc7 the southe,aste'rly line of said lands of Frat.es ( 3:634 Q. _R. 775) South 35° 42'' Oi0" West, 1653.4.5 feet more or 1_ess to the inter.section w;ith. the south- west line of s.a:id -Lot 2::34;~ thenc,e aYon,g the southwest line of said Lot 234 and said Lo't 233 Nor"th 54° 27' 0.5"' ~Jest, 2240.09 feet to a p;oirit; ,thence ~Iorth 3"5° 42' 0~0`` East 30.00 feet more or les:s ~ to th`e "Tr..-ue Point of '$eginning" . Con,tai~ning '8.4 . 9 7 acres more or less.,. Beir"rg a porti,on of A.P a No.. 17-150-1:1.. . 0 rd , 14'~3 ~ ~~~~~ ~^ Pnna 1 nf 1 EXI3IBIT - H (HISTORIC) and A (AGRICULTURAL) PREZONING.FINDINGS l. That the proposed amenc~hnent is in general conformity with the Petal~na General Plan and any applicable Environmental Design Plan. 2. That the public necessity, convenience and general welfare require or clearly permit the adoption of the proposed amendment. ~~~~ ~ Pqge 1 of 1 E~~iIBIT 0 rd , 1483 r~ ' , , . . . i: ~ ' ~ FINDINGS ANb STATEt~]T 'OF FACTS ~ ~l) Air , The Old Adobe/Frates Ranch Final Enyironmeiztal Impact Repor-t identi- ~fied ~signifi.cant poteritial. air qiiality:. effects resulting from the proposed project. ~ - ~ ~ ~ , These effects were considered_in City Council`.Resolution No. 9265~N.C.S. dated August 24,'1981 wherein a s,tatement of overricling°considerations was in- cluded,, which is hereby: incorpor-ated'~by' referenae: ' 2 ) Water . . , , .. ~ ~ Effect - Increased Surface 'Runbff, and ~SediinP,ntatiqn. Site: sedimentation ~ characteristics; while not severe~,: are'~ unpo'rtant because of tlze gotential for ~ a significant c~nulative sediinent clischarge ;due: to" the large site area. Sedi- ments would be transported ~in'to.,,the loca.l aricl regioriaYl drainage nets, ultimate- - ly entering~San Francisco.Bay via the Fetaltnna River. Effect -~~Potential's for Floodi.iig and_Degradation~of Qnsite Stream Channels>. ' Increases ~ iii surface rurioff fram, paved .surfaces and bua.ldings would ~, increase flaws-in Adobe:and Ellis creeks, thereby~increasing potentials for sea- sonal flooding and stream~cYiannel e.rosion; and:;~as a result, increasi:ng long-term sedimentation attr~butable- ~to tYie, proj'ect. ' ~ Effect - Long=Term Water~Quality IiYipa.cts. Local surface water. quality would be influenced in the long-=tezm:,by 2.factors: increased pollutarit loads in run- ,. . , ~ ~ .. of_f'from added urban 5urfaces. Urban pollutasit,l'oadings originating from " proj;ect urban su.ifaces and golf cauz'se fer:tilization could increase the total FetalLUna River loadings by' about~ 5 percent. • . -1- „ ~ ~,~~~~~~~ ~ . . ., ~ ~ : ~ . Paae 1 ~of 3 , , Ord, 1483~~ Finding -,Changes have been incorporated into the projec-'t which wbuld mitigate the above mentioned significant environm~xital effects identified in the Environ- m~rital Impact Report, Statement of Fact - A surface water quality and sedunentation contz'ol plan is required as a condition< of, the Plarined 'Co~rninity Development prezoning:. Said plan must be reviewed and~approvecl by key agencies having juri:sdiction in these matters, prior to issuarice of grading:or building~p~xmits. 3} Land , . . „ The Environmental Impact Report identified two unrmitigatable significant potential land impacts resulting from~the.proposed project. City Council Resolution No. 9265 N.C.S,, dated August 24, 1981 considered significant effects.of urban~area expansion aiid conversion.. of.productive agri- cultural' l~nd to non-agricultural uses'°~'and inade appropriate~ findings and state- . ._ ments of faets regarding sai.d e_ffects. ~~` ~ Effect-The Tolay fault, classified~as."potentially active," appears to traverse the portion~ of this ,site proposed' for golf cotirse use. Potential ing~acts include surface rupture.of golf.course groiinds. Effect - Anticipated.future eartliquake activity fram active faults in the region could cause severe:grouridshakuig arici..localized'failure o£ creek ban.ks. Potentials for'lateral.spreading,,.compaction, lurching and liquefaction are,considered low. Although it„_is'possible~that material suspectible to - liquefaction or co~action is~ ~present withtri° ;the a.lluv_ itun beneath the site, there is no i.nformation available ori cbnditioris below 12 feet. Finding = Changes have•been incorporated,into the project which would mitigate tYie significaii€ environmental effects.identified in the Envirorunental.Impact Report:~ Statement of Facts, - Additional investigation and modifieation of plans to re- flect find:ings~of:said,investigations have.been.;required as a condition of the , Planned Cb~ra~nznity Developmexit prezoning. Investigation and any Plan modifica- tion required would`be.c~leted prior to issuance'of any grading or building permit• ~ , -2- O;rd , T483 ~~~~~~~~ ~ Page 2 of 3 . 4). Minerals = No significant adverse effects: ° ~ 5) Elora . . . _ „ I , Effect = Limited realigriinent; to Ellis Creek and its tributary could - r-esult in significant effects`on riparian:vegetation and wildlife. Likely ,~ alternatives would l~e;construction of localized ehannel protection devices, necessitatirig limited`'vegetatiori removal. The;'"greatest~amount of vegetation removal would occur at the-juriction of -Ellis Creek•ancl its tributazy where a realignm~it of the ehanneTs is proposed. ~ Finding - Changes~have.:been incorporated'into the project which would mitigate the signifieant environmental effects identified in the Envi:ronmental' Irripact Report. , . ~ Statement of Facts - ~ Project plans.have.been altered to avoid~realiclnment of E11is Creek, A , creek preservation and i~rovement plan Yias been requ:ired as a condition of the Planned Conurninity.Develo~n~azt prezoning. The:plan will be reviewed by the State Fish and Game Departrnerit and. approved by the ~Plannirig Co~nission. ' 6)~ Fauna No significant°adverse effects:. 7) Noise - , ~ Significant adverse effects fiave been~..identified, however,. only the resi- dential portion,of thi:s project.will be affectecl..~ _Specific~effects, the requisite ~ finclings and :facts will, -therefore, be addressed at, sucli •tiine as the residential Planned:Unit Developme.rit rezonirig occurs. " ~ ~ . . _ 8) Objects of Historical Significance. Effect - L~ocation of the golf course near the Petaltuna Adobe would en- hance recreation experiences for users of the golf course, but could detract from recreational experiences at the historical mornunent. Findirig - Changes;.have`been incorporated into the'project whicYi would --- mitigate the: significarit efivironmP~tal effeets ~identified iri the Environmental Impact Report: ~ State~nt of Facts - As~ a.conditiqn of the P,lanned. Cammuiiity Develo~ne:nt prezoning,, special.review will be conducted by.the Planning Departrrient to evaluate landscape buffering along the per~neter of the golf course iri the vicinity of t:Fie ~etaltiuna Adbove State Park., ' . . . , ~ . ~~~~~~~ ~ ~ -3- " , ' . ~ - - ~ " . , . . ,. :0rd, 1483 Pa9e 3 of 3