HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Bill 4.B 10/18/2010`S A L U~t
a '~
I85$
,4~,cv Itew~ #4.3
DATE: October T8, 2010
TO: Honorable Mayor and `Members of the City ~ ouncil through City Manager
FROM: Vincent Marengo, Director of Public Works /j
SUBJECT: Resolution Adopting a CEQA Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Program~for the East' Washington Park and Approving
Plans and Specifications for East Washington Park Phase 1
RECOMIVIENDA,TION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution adopting a Mitigated
Negative Declaration (MND) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan for the East
Washington Park Project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and
approving plans and specifications .for East Washington Park Phase 1.
BACKGROUND
The Recreation, Music;:. and.'Parks Commission held a special meeting on November 16, 2006, to
hear public comment and receive ,input, relative to design .and .activity elements desired by the
community at the proposed East Washington Park site. The architecture firm of Gretchen
Stranzl McCann was selected to lead the conceptual master plan process for the park. A large
and diverse group of citizens.representing the various user .groups- attended and contributed to the
conceptual planning efforts. Between February 2007 and May 2007, a series of design
workshops were held with progress reported to the Recreation,. Music •and Parks Commission
each month. At the May 16, 2007 regular meeting of the Commission, the 100% conceptual
master plan was presented and recommended by the Commission for City Council approval, and
on June 4., 2007, the City Council reviewed and approved the 100.% conceptual master plan for
the East Washington Park. The approved conceptual plan included a description of recreational
faeili'ties and park. amenities to be .constructed on the site, and .estimated project costs of
approximately .$.15',000,000:
On January 7, 2008; the City Council authorized a Professional Design "Services Agreement with
Winzler and Kelly for design services to complete construction drawings, specifications and
estimates .for phase 1 of construction, and to complete preliminary Design Development of the
entire park site, including environmental ,review and docum'entati'on, plannng.and preliminary
design for subsequent construction phases. in order to assure logical construction sequencing and
to meet funding availability.
'' °` Agenda Review:
City .Attorney Finance Director City Manager
The overall park~project wiil,provde three new all-weather and four natural turf playing fields to
meet a currently urunet~.need; an intense and growing demand for youth and community sports
facilities :for .activities ;such 'as soccer, baseball,. softball; and lacrosse. The park will also provide
community amenities for leisure, activities, including four distinct. areas with plantings, amenities
for picnicking, children's play areas, shade structures and seating, restrooms, concessions, BMX
,course, a' network. of multi-use pathways for walking, bicycling, and hiking that will connect to
the City's urban separator path; as well as an .operations and maintenance building.
The .Phase I priority elements :include the. design and construction of three lit synthetic
soccer/lacrosse fields with all, necessary infrastructure improvements, including but not limited
to, access to fields, adequate parking, and electrical power: Phase I will also include
improvements to East Washington Street, as determined through a concluded traffic study. In
addition to Phase I, the design development plan of the .entire park has considered all necessary
frontage improvements, including road widening, striping; shoulders, bicycle lanes, and all utility
connections on site and off, as necessary.
DISCUSSION
In accordance with City Council direction provided on,January 7, 2008, the preliminary design
for the 25 acre East Washington. Park Project is complete. In addition. to the preliminary design,
construction plans and specifications for Phase I have been completed and can be advertised as
soon as adequate funding is identified.
A Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project'was published in
the Argus-Courier on January 1, 2009; posted with the ,Sonoma. County Clerk and forwarded to
the State Clearing House, providing- for a thirty (30) day public comment period as required. by
CEQA. The City received three agency comments during, that thirty-day period and addressed
them in the final MND, dated March l., 2010. No comments on the MND have been received
from the public.. The agency comments did not require changes in the Initial Study or in the
Project, and no signfcant effects were identified. One mitigation:measure, BIO-4, has been
modified to add a monitoring plan with specified goals, contents and standards for the re-
establishment of wetlands vegetation,. which makes that mitigation measure more., effective and
does not create any new significant effects. Adoption of theMitigated Negative Declaration and
the Mitigation Monitoring Program. is.required by CEQA prior to approval and construction of
the project.
On September 1 "5; 2010, the Recreation, Music and Parks Commission was presented the East
Washington Park Project and recommended City Council. approval of the Plans and
Specifications.
FINANCIAL IMPACTS
The estimated total project cost, including planning, design, administration, construction
management and inspection, construction, and project contingency, is $23,000,000.
Construction, construction management and inspection, administration, overhead and project
contingency for Phase I is estimated to cost $12,200,000.
2
i
Funding for the design. and construction of the entire East'Washrigfon.Park project will come
from multiple sources, including:,- an Open Space grant of.$2,000;000, awarded in June 2007;
.approximately $2,000,000 of private funds and in-kind,contrbutions, led~and managed bypark
users; available impact fees, which are not estimated at this time; and additional sources still to
be identified.
AT'Y'ACI~IVIENTS
1. Resolution
2. Project Location Map
3. Final Mitigated Negative Declaration/ Response to Comments
4. Appendix A -Mitigation Monitoring Plan
~ Items ,listed..lielow are Iarge in .volume and.are not attached.to this rep, ort, but may be viewed in the
City Clerk's office..
5. Draft Revised,Initial Study/Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration for the East Washington
Park Project '
3
m.
RESOLi1TION ADOPTING A CEQA.IVIITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATI(JN AND
MITIGATION,IVIONITQRING AND REPORTING PLAN FOR THE EAST
WASI~INGTON PARK PROJECT AND,
~.
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIQNS FOR EAST WASHINGTON PARK
PHASE 1
WHEREAS, the City of Petaluma is preparing to construct a 25-acre park on City-owned
land to meet the needs of the Petaluma community; and
WHEREAS, the Petaluma .community has participated in public meetings and design
workshops, providing :input-regarding features they would.like to see in the.proposed park; and
WHEREAS, on May 16, 2007, the Recreation, Music, and Parks Commission
recommended to the City Council that they approve a Conceptual Master Plan for the East
Washington Street Park project and authorize City staff to proceed with design plans; and
WHEREAS, on June 4,,.2.007, the City Council. reviewed,;and approved the Conceptual
Master Plan for East Washington. Park. and authorized City staff to proceed with design
development plans and construction documents for Phase I' of construction; and
WHEREAS, an Initial Study and 1Vlitigated Negative Declaration. (MND) was prepared
,,
pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which
concludes that there is no substanti'al,~evidence that the proposed East Washington Park Project,
as mitigated, will have a significant ;adverse effect on the environment; and
WIIEREAS, a mitigation and monitoring plan incorporating all mitigation measures
identified in the MND has been prepared for the project; and
r
WHEREAS, a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project
was published tithe Argus-Courier on January 1, 2009, and posted with the Sonoma County
Clerk and the State Clearing House, providing for a thirty (3'0) day public comment period. as
required by CEQA; and
WI~EREAS, the City received and reviewed all comments received during the 30-day
public review period and to date, none of which identify new significant or substantially
increased environmental effects from those evaluated in the MND; end
WHEREAS, at its. public meeting on .September 15, 2010; the Recreation,. Music and
Parks Commission reviewed the East Washington Park Project and recommended approval of
the Phase I Plans and Specifications to the City Council..
4
,~
a
~.
NOW, TIIEREFOItE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council finds as follows:
1. On the basis of the entire record, including the 'Initial .Study and Mitigated
Negative Declaration for the East Washington Park .Project (''Project"); dated March 1, 2010,
there is no substantial evidence that the Project, as mitigated, will have a significant effect on the
environment.
2. The Initial Study/1Vlitigated Negative Declaration has been reviewed by the City
Council and reflects the .independent. judgment and analysis of the City as lead agency for the
project.
3. A modification made, to Mitigation Measure ~BI0-4; following circulation of the
MND; adds a monitoring plan with specified goals, contents and standards for the re-
establishment of wetlands vegetation, which makes Mitigation. Measure BIO-4 more effective
and does not create any new significant effects on the environment.
4. TheProject is not located on a site listed op. any Hazardous Waste .Site List
compiled by the State pursuant to Government Code §65962.5.
5. ~ The record of proceedings. on the decision on the:Project is available for public
review at Petaluma City Hall,. Public Works Department, `1 l English St., Petaluma, CA.
BE IT I' URTIIER RESOI_.VED by the City Council that:
1. All mitigation measures identified in the Initial :Study/Mitigated Negative
Declaration are unposed upon the Project as conditions. of approval.
2. The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program presented herewith as
Appendix A to the Mitigated Negative Declaration is.hereby adopted.
3. The plans and specifications for the East Washington Park Phase I Project. are
approved:
1523359.1
5
4, ~ `e~ ~' "a~~~~,i ~ti'
~., ~~~,,
i
i
~' Q,
N, ~-
~_
SC`
~' ~
Q' F
0..i N
Z. Q
~.
1- .
~!
Z,.
F
N.
Q'
[iJ
~ ~p, 8
~~~F~s:~
~498Sr~
F
;~
€'e
:U~~~
6
EAST WASHINGTON RARKPROJECT
~~ ~ TIVE DECLARATION/ RESPONSET,O COMMENTS
FINAL MITIGATED NEGA ,
' IVIIT/Gi4"TED NEGATIVE~DE.CLARATION
East Washi>ngfon.Park'P~roject
`March 1; 20'10
,: Lead~Agency~and P..roject Proporient~
:City of Petaluma ~ ~~
11 English Street
Petaluma, `California 94952; , ,
Phone (.707) 776-3673
,, .,
PROJECT LO'CATIOIV
The City of Petaluma is located approximately 4'0 miles north of San Francisco :along
U:S. Highway 101; in Sonoma County (see Figure: 1; Vicinity Map)... 'The City of. Rohnert ~
Park lies to the north; the. community of Penngrove to the northeast, the, :Sonoma
Mountain range. fo the, east, arid. the Ctyof Nouato~~~to th_e south'; The project''is located' to
g y . g , gton,FStreet,.between the: Rooster Run
the east. of U.S. Hi hwa TO;a ,alon East Washin
Golf Course and Adobe Road (see Figure 1, Vicinity Map)..,
„~ , ,, ,
PROJECT DESCRIPTION.
The Conceptual Master Plan (Figure .2; Conceptual 1Vlastex Plan) consists -of three
synthetic-turf soccer ~f elds "and three natural-turf baseball/softball~;fields. All -six` fields
would have. lights for+nighttime, use.:,, East Washngton;;Park also includes a number of
other recreational facilities descr>bed in detail below: '
Concession StandsfRestrooms/1VIaintenance Buildings: ' - The project ,includes:
construction of four•park facility .buildings: a 1;000-square foot concession with storage
and restropm structure; ari •8'40' square foot restroom/conce'sson s"tructure, a smabl
restroom facility; :and. an 860=square foot maintenance building.., These buildings are
• located throughout the ,park at sites"'.noted. bn Figure 2~.: ° All buildings would be single
story and constructed. of material tha_ t meets the. nature and; character of the. City of
,. ,, Pe"taluma's;park system.
S ; orts ~>f+'ields - :The :East Washington Park design includes construction of six sports'
fields. Three synthetic. turf fields would be constructed in the, southern portion of the site'
aortion asnllustratedaon Fas ure12a Consftruc'tioneof the f e dbe~a nstructed on ;the northern.
g _, y require the import of fill
P _ _ _ _ _ . -
material to create a stable, well drained base for the ;,fields. ,Spectator uew.ng areas
would be constructed at eacfi ofthe six fields with shade structures and berms.
BMX. Bicycle Area = A ,BMX' bicycle area would'be constructed on, the eastern edge of
the park. The facility would, be approximately one acre and would include a track with
jumps and: mounds. The area would be separated, ~from° the sports field by' a field fence.,
The remainder of the bicycle area would be unfenced,
March 1, 20'A:0 Page 7 Winz/er:& Kelly
0205507008
,_. _
~,
,~ ~~
' EAST WASHINGTON PARK PROJECT
i IVE DECLARATION/RESPONSE TO'COMMENTS
FINAL.MITIGATED NEGAT
Subject to~available~funding,,~thefproject would.,;bei.constructed in Phases. Phase 1 would
occur is spring 2:009 (see Figure 3) and construction of future phases of the project is
urikriown ate thin time. Please'~refer to the ~~Project Description in the :Draft MND for. a ful"1
project description of the project:
.. ,.
Phase 1 :Construction., Phase 1 consists of the following- components:
® Three synthetic-turf soccer'fiel'd'sbcated in he southern portion of the:property.
,~~
® Lighting for~the three fields (70-80 feet tall) and Lighting for the access road and
parking areas.
® East Washington Street;`froritage mprovementsf„includirig~arright-turn deceleration.
lane to the' new access' road. for' the property; and a' `Glass 1 bike path, adjacent to
East Washington.Streetfrom:Rooster Run Golf Course.to~the site..
® Detention basin located in the southwest portion of the site for treatment of
stormwater°runoff.'
'`''~ ® 24-foot wide paved access road from East Washington Street to parking area for
s dewalkev ~~ nlds The„access road would'include storm drainage, utilities; and a
Y
he parking~area.
® I59 `parking spaces. consi4sting of 157 standard arid=2 handicapped spaces.
,; ® Installation. of tempo- nary f g g tern side; of the playing fi
encn alon the wes elds
(between;the fields, and,„the,;golf course) and permanent'fencng along the property '
" boundaries to the east:
® Well ,and/or potable water ~use~ for drinking; landscape irrigation and wash
down/cool down of the synthetic fields; including a~,6ooster pump station.
® Landscaping within parking areas,:. around. the three fields and the bike/pedestrian
path.
® Drainage facilities as followsc: minor runoff from the~~access road would sheet
flow across the natural turf f'elds south. towards
drain within the, parking. area: to route runoff into '"the golf course. .A new,;- storm.
the bioretentiori/detentiori basin.,
'' The basic runoff would be:. discharged to an existing' Swale: that would .:convey
runoff to East Washington Creek. The synthetic fields would include an
. drain system to convey runoff to the';existing. swale adjacent and just. south.
under
of the project site prior to sheeting towards'the golf course.
March 1, 201:0.. Page 2 ~ Winz/er & Kelly
020.5507008
~~. , ,,
'f 1' '
a
~.
i !o
„o
N
~. „
0„
Z'
~ .
36
,o ,
a
0
~.
c
a
.o
U
O
J
O
C
O'
.~.
d. .
~:
N
N'.
J'
LL
Q
~:.
U,
U
d'
~O
,a
y
a
o
!;~, .
c.
^L
• Wi
~r,ai3°O:, „~
~;i i -
N,
W'
i ~:
o.,
P
0
~.
0
N
O`
~' O
E
~.
o,
a
0
T
U
~,
N'
O"
N,
~~
~~.
~, ~ I I ~ "III ~ i ~ ~ ~~, i41 ~i~ ~ ~~
.. ~ II
o
~ 9 €
e
~ ~ V
~ e
8~.
~ ~~ Z ~ ;
3
~
~ ~ a a
< l N(~Q.OQ.
kl ~
~,
~
'
~ u.~OZ
_ a
_ _
.
~
r ~
a ~ S
~~ 'i . s
t '
~ ~
~ i 4~, i
. Z
~ i r ,s
' ~
!
u ~
s~ r ~=. 4 s
F~ t ' `~ f L; 4
~ ~~ W
Q
~ - - t"
~
i ~~ ' r , ~i, a
'.
e ,:- - ~ ~
`
r
~~
o,~a
- `: t r .
€~~ a ~i: i,a ~ ~~- i
' ~~~s5 I i ~,,
_ {.
` :y _
_
L .
e 8
~
y§~ l
` I ` I _p
t 1 t a v
.X
~ ~- E
r
C
+
~~ ~'
~ ,a
, ~
~
{{,,
rl-,-
~ I' g
~
~ 1~Y
E ~~, .a ~~
~~~~ ~ r
,j(iN ~ e.8
pp
~ }
~~
- ~
~~ r
~ g m..~
~~B
t
-A
_ i ~$~~
}JS
g,
d
~
~ i ~~
:
$
t B ~t
~
~
-
` - ~' ~.
t-
- -
a -"
` ~
~
(~
' S ii ~
1 ~ 4
S
d c/"
~
~ r4 ~ F
~
a ~
~.~
~ -
8 r~ ~~-
', ~' ~ i 3~
_
Bg Lj~-2= [ ~
`~_ t ~ ~
< ` ~ j~ ~ r
L. ty
B
I
z n I
;
~ [
s
~ ~
Y.~
.. ~.g. '
by a~~bs
~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ a
B ~ s' ; g:
.
ii ~ ' ~~ ~ ~' ~~
~ n
8 s
I . ;
~i
yIl
~ ~
~ ~~ .c
o -~ ~ X ~
~~ g~ ~ _H _ g a €~ ~,
sa " - t ~ ~~
- 8a~ `r _ .v~` 31.~-o k.~g°
t ~~~~
_
{
i
.~
j
! u
A
/
,.
~ /
~
l ~.
f ~ ~
~
..
..
; :.r, ~
~
.c.~
.
~ ~ W
J
a
,~~
~
3 ~
_~ ~ ~
i
i , '~
~aaa~s uo~6uiys pM ~,sp'
Wde22i,- Oi02 'W unN B~P'OiIOE uoid~~a}saN ion}da~uoj~sa~nBlj\tlD3]\}~a~o,y,iry.iod uo}8u ~ - ~
tysnj~ yso3 800-LO-SS020\ '
ounin;ad 3oL}p - SSO20\~P
I~
z ----,_ `--~~,~i
!` ~~-
_-
_v ~ ~; c.
~~ ~ ~. ~, ~' ;,1
~, ~!~ 1
r i_
i!
4!. ' ~ ,
i i ~ __ ~ - r~a-
;,,, ~,
~~"r ,
I{ ~,~' _ I
G _ Y~
!! i `'~
~'J t 1 ~ c
~~~ r ~ !, -- ~, ~~~ ~
~ -_
t -
,- ~ _~
~ ~ ~~
,` ~c
\ ~--~
/!\I:,
~ ~I ~ > .
~ ~ ,.
il~~ ~ ,
~ \' it
1~~~
`u`
~~'i; ;~'
~~ ~ _ ~ ~~
r ~ / ~ o
~~ ~ / `.~ ~
g t
~~ ~ ,.
~ ~ g / !r ~
,.
;.~
- --~
tJ' I _......,_rE
~ l' ~ ~ __..., 3
\ I I
2 ~ ~ I ~ ~ _~
ag- ~ ~,~ ~ _,~, ~~~
~ ~ i ~~~ ~ ~; I ~ ~
r` ~
I I iY ,~~~ •~ ~ ~' mss/
~ ~ ~ ~ L
~! ~ ~ $ i,
~~ ~~~, ~~ ~ ~~i ~~~ ~i i ~<
-~ ~ ,/~,.
> > /
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ / ) e V ~ ~~ ~ ~
r ~ ~ J r_ '~
_.. - _ -
.~ _
µ~^
I
- OtOZ 't0'~oW. 6Mp~udld;alS a !suauad o0\sa~n6ij\y03J\1'
I
Rl!0 - SSOZO\ ~f
1,
I ....
0
5 ~,
a w ,
w
H p' ;
~ ~ >
a
~ ~ Y .:
~ ~ ~
J
ww~a
x
_~aZO
(7aLL~
LL ~O O~ Z
1i i'' Q
O ~
w ~
~ N
w
a
~g
~~
~ -~
a g:
y ~ ~
~~
~€
gl° &
EAST WASHINGTON'PARK PROJECT
FINAL MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION! RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
FINDING OF,NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT
Based on the attached Initial Study ~ and other ~ pertinent informations with the
recommended mitigation measures, ,the project does not:. have .a significant effect on the
environment.. This project will not have a detrimental. effect: upon either short-term or
long-term environmental'. goals; This projectwill'°ngt have impacts?which are individually
limited but cumulatively considerable, This project wilT;nothave environmental impacts
which will cause substantial. adverse effects upon human beings, either directly or
indirectly. :Mitigation measures have been added to the project' to reduce potentially
significant impacts to a less than-si~gni~ficant level. ~ -
INITIAL STUDY
An Initial Study was prepared for the. East Washington Park_Project and sent ,to the State
Clearinghouse and interested. agencies on January 1, 20,09 fora a 30=day public review
peri'od'. A Notice of Intent`to Adopt. a Mitigated Negative Declaration was published n~
the Argus CouNier.on January '1, 2.009,. and mailed. to'property •owners within 30Q_ feet of.
the, project: Three letterswere received from agencies during; the 30-day comment
period.
mod feed valuations relatMiveDto the updated CEQA Guidel neo. the: project and provides
s:
I~SPONSE TO COIVIMENTS'ON'T1FIE INITIAL STUDY
The Cit Cquncl mu ' , _, ;' d duririg'the comment period prior
st consa,_ er~t e .comments receive
y •
p g g Negative Declaration. Responses to the comments received are
to ado tin a Mini ated ~~~
included 'bel'ow.. The comments did not .require 'changes m 'the Initial Study or in the
Project, and no sgnif cant effects were identified, " .
LOCATION OF DOC•LT•1VIENTS
The documents which constitute the record of proceedings for this Project are located at
the .City of Petaluma Public Works Department at 11 English Street, Petaluma, California
94952.
1VIITIGATION MEASURES
The, mitigation;"measures below are compiled from the Initial Study. These mitigation
measures,. have been, added to the project and ..have been founds .fo reduce ,potentially
significant impacts of the proposed project to ;less than .si'gnificant' A Mitigation
Monitoring. Program has :been prepared and is attached as an appendix to the Initial
Study.
Mitigation .1Vleasure L U 1: Provide Class I $ike/Pedestrian Path.
Thee City shall construct a 10-foot wide Class I Bike/Pedestrian Path from Sky
Ranch Road to~ the Rooster Run culvert crossng:,(see Figure 5; Proposed Class I
March f, 2010 Page 6 ~ Winz/er & Kelly
02.05507008
~2
~ ~ ",
" EAST WASHINGTON PARK PROJECT
FINAL MITIGATED',NEGATIVE DECLARATION/ RESPONSE TO COMMENTS'
Bke/PedestrianPath). To ensure the Path is ° a .safe distance from vehicles
traveling along East Washington Street; ,the Path shal'1 be located a ,minimum of
fire feet from the~edge' ofpavement on East Washington Street.
1llitiQation ,Measure GEO-1'c Subsurface ,Investigation and' Implementation of
Recommendations
The City shall. ensure 'that project plans and sped cations are consistent with the
recommendations made in the. Geotechncal Investigation, East Washington Park
(Miller Pacific ,Group Project Number 1206:04),, dated September 30, .20:08
(Appendx:B). This includes recommendations regarding seismic design; .grading,
expansive soils; foundation design, slab-on-grade, underground utilities,
geotechnical drainage; pavements, and maintenance., The City shall contract with
a state- registered geologist to observe and test site grading, including. lime
treatment. of expansive soils or import; compaction of select fil'1 and surface
drainage, and foundation excavations.
~,
Mitigation.Measure:AlR-1:Dust Control Measures for Construction;A"ctivities
The City shall implement the following dust control. measures, as needed.:
Water allactive construction areas at leasttwice daily.,
• Cover all truck's, hauling .soil, sand, -and other loose materials or require all
truck to ~ma~ntairi~~at'least~two feet of freeboard.
®' Pave; apply water three ;times daily,; or apply (non=toxic) soil. stabilizers on
all unpaved access roads; parking, areas and staging areas at construction
sites.
• Sweep daily (with water sweepers)' all, paved' access: roads; parking areas and
staging areas at,construction sites.
® Sweep streets daily (with water sweepers) if visible soil material is carried
onto adjacent public s"treets.
® Hydroseed or apply (non=toxic) soil, stabilizers to°inactive construction areas
(previously graded areas inactive for ten days or more).
Enclose, cover;; water twice daily or apply- (non-toxic) soil. ~ binders to
exposed;stockpiles (dirt; sand;. etc.).
® Limit traffic speeds on unpaved roads°to 15.mph:
® I"nstall sandbags or other erosion control measures to prevent silt runoff to
,public roadways.
,,;,
® Replantwegetation `in disturbed ,areas as quickly as possible.
March 1, 2010 Page 7 Winz/er & Kelly
0205507008
13
. ,. , .
~inY ~ i..
EAST WASHINGTON°PARK PROJECT
FINAL MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION/ RESPONSE TO COMMENTS.
Mitigation Measure AIR 2: Equipment Exhaust' Control
The City shall control equipment emissions when heavy construction' equipment
is operating. 'These measures shall include:: .
m Reduce unnecessary idling of construction equipment (i.e., limit idling time
to 5 minutes or'less).
® Where possible; use: newer, cleaner-burning" :diesel-powered construction
equipment.
a Properly maintain construction equipment per; manufacturer specifications.
® Designate ,a Disturbance Coordinator responsible for ensuring that
mitigation measures ,to reduce air quality impacts. from construction are
properly'mplemented.
1Vlitigafion Measure~AlR-3 Design Park to. Employ "Green" Measures
® The. City shall achieve° a 5%,reduction in -vehicle trips, Trip reduction could
be accomplished: by promoting carpooling through, for example education
acid providing preferred:parking.
The City shall use efficient~l'i'ghting_materials and methods, such as low-
intensity LED light fixtures. for parkway and pathway lights, and install
~controls~which, will provide for non-continuous operation of the 1-fighting to
reduce unnecessary operating time.
MitiQation.Measure HYD-1•, SCormwater Mana~e_me_nt
Construction :phase- Stormwater Management
"The City shall.-;require that .construction, activities, be performed in a manner that
minimizes the sediment andlor pollutants. entering directly or 'indirectly into the
storm drain system; or ,groundwater. The City shall incorporate the fofilowing
provisions into-the ,construction plans and specifications.. .
m The City shall ;requre construction staging areas'; and -areas for storage. of
any hazardous materials (i.e., motor oil, fuels, ,paints, etc.) used during;~
construction be oeated on improvement .;plans. All: construction ataging
areas- shall be,,located away from aiiy stream° and:adjaeent drainage areas to
• preverit runoff from.. construction. areas': ,Areas ~designated,'for storage of
hazardous materials. shall include proper containment ,'features to present
contaminants from entering drainage, :areas; in the .event of a spill or leak.
® No debris; soil; silt; sand; cement;. concrete or washings thereof, or other
coristriicficjn related materials~~or wastes;, oil or petroleum p"rodixcts' or other
organic or earthen material. shall 'be 'allowed "to, enter. any drainage system.
All discarded, material including washings and any accidental spills shall be
removed ;and, disposed of at an :approved disposal site: The, City hall
designate appropriate disposal method's and'/or facilities on the construction
plans or iri the specifications.
March 1, 2010 Page 8 Winz/e~ & Kelly
0205507008
'I 3
~. d
n y.. i
' I
" ' EAST'WASHINGTONPARK PROJECT '
.FINAL MITIGATED NEGATIVE DEGLf,~RATION/ RESPONSE TO COMMENTS',
The City -shall submit a Notice' of :Intent; for compliance -with the conditions
for a general permit 'under' the' National Rollutant Discharge Eliminate
System (NPDES)~ stormwater permit' for. construction activities administered
by the :Regional Water Quality Control Board. The.conditions require
development: 'and implementation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention
construsction s to perimeterP proposed bua lnding ite map which shows- the
asking lots roadways,
s; p,
stormwater collection, and discharge points, general topography both
before and after construction, and drainage,: patterns across the project site.
Post-.Construction Stortnwater Management
The City shall require that. the project comply with the Design Standards
contained in Attachment 4 of State Water Resources Control Board. Water Quality
Order No. 2003-0005-DWQ...Desgn. Standards -include, but are not limited to, the
following:
® Treatment, control BMPs :must incorporate either a volumetric or flow-based
treatment control design. For the proposed detention basin, a volumetric
based design criterion in accordance with Attachment 4 of the. General
Permit shall be used.:
® Post -development peak stonnwater runoff discharge rates"shall not exceed
pre-development; rates: where the increased peak stormwater discharge rate
will result'in increased' potential for downstream, erosion.
m All storm. drain, inlets. and .catch basins within the project area must be
stenciled. with ,prohibitive 1'anguage (such as:' "NO DUMPING -DRAINS
TO CREEK") and%o`r`graphical acons~~to discourage illegal dumping.
Stormwater Mankgem"ent BNIP Maintenance. Plan
Maintenance is es"sentia'1 for a"ssuring that treatment, controls continue to function
effectively and that ~the;:.B1VIPs do not become a~ nuisance. Therefore, fihe City
shall develop a maintenance. mechanism to ensure tfiattreatment controis~ function
effectively :over time:
The .City shah',us.e the CASQA Stormwater'Best ~Management.Practce Handbook
for New and Redevelopment, ,or a similarly acceptable guidance document; to
create a~ maintenance plan for each type of ~treatmerit control used. At a minimum
the maintenance :mecfiariisin shall. include ,the 'scope, and frequency for inspection
;' e limited'to, the following:
and'-maintenance. Maintenance shall include; butnot,b
Landscape=based controls, such as, vegetated swales and detention
basins, shall, be :mowed and. irrigated during dry weather to the extent.
necessary to l{eep:vegetaton~alive,
Ob"structions and trash shall be ~remo~ed fro"m vegetated areas when
observed:.
Pestcides~and fertilizers shall not,be.used on vegetated controls.
March 1, 2010 Page 9 Winz/er & Kelly
0205507008
~~
EAST INASHINGTON`PARK PROJECT
FINAL MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION/ RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
® When, ponding is observed,,:minor ,grading shall be performed to
restore positive drainage of vegetative controls.
® If b'oretentiori areas are' used,. ;the control`s shall be inspected twice
annually ,for obstructions and 'trash; these:. shall be removed. where
observed,,. In, addition, bioretention, areas, shall. be inspected twice
annually for. ppnded water ,and, if observed, surface soil shall be
removed, and re laced with sand.
If detention. basins are used; the City shall inspect 'thee structural
g ' y rriiannually„ Vegetation ~~sha~ll ~be
mte rrt , of `the outlet. and berms se
harvested annuall durin the summer:. In addition, accumulated trash,
Y, g
debris; arid' sediment shall be removed at the beginning, and .end of the
wet season or as needed.
~,
Miti afion 1Vfeasure.H.YD-2.•: Restriction of Well Wafer Usage
The City shall not use a pumping rate in excess of 1'20 gallons per' minute for
more than a 24-hour duration. An Irrigation Operations .Schedule shall be
implemented that would include a weekly usage restriction of no more than
350;000 gallons of wa'terp~r-:week. '
.. ,
1Vlitigation'Measure. Bi0-I:. Protection ~Yleasures. forNestin~'Birds
To avoid nesting birds, the City shall' perform construction work during the ,period
August 15 through February°28/29; if feasible; when breeding activities will have
been completed and next year's breeding activities not, yet have started.
will :not :be required for construction work carried ,out ~in
Preconstruction surveys
the non-breeding season. If construction• work is scheduled- during'':the breeding
season (prior to August 15), a. qualified wildlife. biologist shall conduct: apre-
construction survey fo determine if nesting'birds are.present "in or in the vicinity, of
vegetation to .be °rernoved. ' she pre-consfructi'on survey shall .be conducted within
15 days prior to the start of.work from March 1 through May 31 (since there is
higher potentia!1 for, birds to initiate: nesting. during this :period),, and within 3b days
prior to the starC of work from June 1 through Augustly.
If active nests. are~~found n~~ the work area, ~~~the~ biologist. shah .determine an
appropriately sized buffer around. the nest in which `nq work will be ,.allowed until'
the young have successfully fledged'. The size .of .;the. nest .buffer shall be
determined by the biologist in consultation with the California Department of Fish
and Game (DFG), and'- shall' 'be based on:'the .nesting' species, its sensitivity' to
.disturbance, and.the ;expected types. of disturbance.
Mitigation Measure-BI0-2: Protection Measures for American Bader
The ° City shall conduct a preconstruction survey for the American badger at the
project site within .seven days prior to start of construction. Surreys shall be
conducted .by°, a wildlife biologist with experience indentifying badger burrows.
March' 1, 2010 Page 10 Winz/er & Kelly
" 020'5507008
l
EAST' WASHINGTON PARK PROJECT
'FINAL MITIGATED NEGATIVE:DECLARATION%'RESPONSE'TO COMMENTS
Survey methods, should, ,incl'ude conducting parallel, transects: through the
grassland community looking for badger burrows...
„
If active badger burrows :are dentif ed; they should be avoided. If avoidance is
riot feasible, a biologist;. should determine if'the burrow is ,being used for breeding.
If young are determined to: be .present, the burrow should be avoided. until young
vacate the .burrow". If 'the ;burrow is "simply being used as refugia' by the' badger,
with approval :from CDFG; a~"one=way e~ictiori door should be installed to remove
the badger fr ' burrow:. If it digs back pinto `the burrow, as approved by
om rts
CDFG; live traps. 'should. ,t'e 'established at the burrow entrances to trap and
remove badgers from~~the area of°impact.
,W ~,
Mitigation. Measure BIO-3c Protection.Measures for°the California Red legged
F~'OP
" ruction of Phase 2 of the project, a_qualified biologist. shall,prepare a
Prior to const
site assessment report following the USF'WS revised protocol (Revised guidance
on Site Assessments' and Field Surveys for"' th'e' California Red-..legged Frog,
August 20:05): The report shall be submitted to, the ,Army .Corps of Engineers for
amento Fish and Wildlife Offce:.Their biologists would
their submittal to -the Sacr
then determine, based on' the report; one of th"e following-courses of action':
® No further work'is needed, with regard to ,CRF,
CRF are ental take authorization should be
® assumed to be present and ncid
obtained through Section 7 Consultation or-~a Section 10 Permit through
.. ,
the Endangered Species Act (ESA).. Secton_ 10 of the ESA provides. the
,r hanism to issue "take" (meaning to harass, harm,
USFW5 wrt a mec
pursue, hunt, shoot, would trap; capture or coll'eet or atternpf to engage in
any such contact [ESA'§3(19)]), or "incidental take" permits which permits
take of listed f sh and wildlife ~speci'es that results from, 'but 'is not the
purpose:. of carrying; out an otherwise lawful actvify by a Federal agency
or applicant"['SQCFR§'402:02],
Focused field "surveys by a qualified b"iologist.may be necessary in order to
determine presence ~.or absence of CRF; ~ .
o If no CRF, including larvae ~or eggs,, are found, during the surveys,.
and the 'USFWS accepts the results (i'.e._, accepts that, the survey
was conducted. appropriately by ~a' .qualified biologist, etc;;), the '
results :would be considered °vali'd :for two ,years: After two ,years,.
new surveys could be required. 'The„protocol level. surveys occur.
over a "period of several months..
o Lf presence' is determined during.".field" surveys then incidental take
,~rauthorzation should be"obtaned~as,~discussed,in.bullet #2 above.
Mitigation 1Vleasure B10-4:=Avoid Fill of Jurisdictional'Wetlands
The City of Petaluma shall avoid fill of, jurisdictional' wetl"ands, to the extent
feasible; Zf'fill cannot be avoided; the City 'shall compensate for these impacts by
March 7, 201."0 Page 11 Winz/er-&-Kelly
' 0205507008
1~
,
` WASHINGTON",PARK PROJECT
~ EAST ,
FINAL',MITIGATED NEGATIV
E DECLARATION/ RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
creation or restoration of wetlands so that there" is no net loss of wetlands.
Measures mayfnclude:
® Removal of sediments and foreign, materials. deposited by construction
activities fror~n jurisdictional wetlands.
,,.
a Restoration of disturbed wetlands to original contour and. hydrologic
conditions:
® Purchase 'of wetland bank mitigation credits at "a ~ 1.1 ratio or as
determined byresource agencies.
® Creation. of .compensatory acreage to mitigate ,temporary and., permanent
impacts• at ,a ~ 11 ratio. or as determined by resource agencies.
Compensatory wetlands shall' ~ be - in-kind located within the same
watershed as the impacted wetland; if feasible:, Out-of--kind compensatory
wetlands,. if constructed, shall provide equal. or greater ~ wetland "function
and value'; than ~irnpacted waters..
® To.Y„"..,,.,,1 1.,~~ .;~ ,ti>o~l:,,;.1~ ~k~ll 1,0" ,Y;;~;.Y~~e,-1 1~„ ,-o*;,,-~;,,,.t +l,o ~;~e r., ;t
L-V-6rirp2~}Sfl•~ ,~ :.~,.,..;1;] l.o .,+ ., 1 .T_.,,;, ~;.,~_ :.,. :;~ ,ao~o,-w.;,,o.7 1.,. «o~~,,,«~o
uge~Eic~-~°cznPvi-ir~E6rrp°cii$fit~0ii~'bt0~k~~-t&k~t~i° ~;,""" ,•{` •,,1,1;tt6irc^cl
. A monitorins? aril rnana eg rnent plan shall.. be developed
to .ensure the successful. establishment of the :riew plantings. This plan
shall set forth restoration goals, the •ty~es 'and amount .of wetland. plants. to
be' used, a plantm`g. plan, a waterins; -and fertilization res;ime, and a
monitoring schedule Wand performance. stand"arils". by which to measure
;~ , _. ,
Mitigation 1Vleasure.NOl=1: PublicAddress System.Desi,2n Standard
...,
The use of loudspeakers or public address system's shall'~~be"prohibited before 7:00
AM or after 10:00 PM .daily (except Saturday, Sunday, sand state, federal or local
holidays when the proh:ib"ited time, is before 9:00 AM and after 10:00 PM).
y t the public address system.is..designed and operated so
The Cit shall ensure. tha
as not to generate maximum noise levels exceeding 50 dBA at neighboring
residential properties: In order to achieve this noise-performance standard, "thee
public address system shall be designed. and operated` to limit the sound level of
the ;speakers to 70 dBA at a reference distance of 50.. feet. :Such .design .and
operation would achieve compliance with the "noi'se performance standard:
March 1', 2010 Page .12 Winz/er & Kelly
0205507008
D
' ~ EAST WASHINGTON"PARK PRO;IECT
FINAL MITIGATED NEGATIVE DEG6ARATION/ RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Mitigation Measure 1VOL=2: Construction Noise.Reduction
,~
The City of ~Peta~luria „and its contractor shall~;~control equipment noise. Controls
shall include the;following:
® Limit noise 'generating activities at the :construction site or in areas
adjacent to the construction site to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. on
weekdays and 8,:00 'a:m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays, No construction
activities should occur''on_ Sundays or holidays.
m .Equip all' internal- combustion engine driven. equipment with intake and
exhaust.. muffl'ers' that are in good condition° and appropriate for the
equipment.: '
® Locate stationary noise generating 'equipment- as far as possible from
sensitive. receptors when sensitive receptors adjoin or are near a
construction,project area.
m om ressors .and other s
Utiaze "quiet" :air c p tationary noise.. sources where
technology exrsts.
® Prohibit unnecessary idling of internal. combustion engines.
m The contractor shal'1 prepare a detailed construction plan identifying the
schedule for major.. noise-generating construction activities. The
construction "plan shall identify a procedure °for coordination with the
adjacent noise,senst'ive facilities so that construction activities can be
scheduled to minimize noise distur-~bances.
m Designate a . "disturlance coordinator", wh6 would be responsible. for
responding to .:any local complaints about construction noise. The
disturbance coordinator will determine the cause of the noise complaint
(e:g., starting toearly, bad muffler, etc:) and will .require that reasonable
measures} warranted to correct the problem be implemented.
Conspicuously post ~aaelephone number, for the disturbance coordinator at
the construction site and include it in 'the .notice sent to neighbors
regarding the' construction schedule.
Miti~ktion 1Gleasure'A""ES-1: Minimize LiQht'and Glare
Thee City shall take on-site light level measurements to ensure. that the ,lights meet
the: design. criteria of the commonly foll"owed "Recommended Practices" of the
_ Illuminatrig Engineering Society of:North America: Specifically; the City shall
,. ensure that' the .lights meet the design criteria for (average illuminance levels for a
' p y Recommended Practice .for Sports and
le Area Lighting, ands RP-3;3, 'Lighting: for Exterior Environments.
Retreat on
Light level: measurements shall also. be taken to,ensure that they `are accurately set
to rneet° the on-site lighting. requirements set forth in they City's Zoning Ordinance
Performance Standard Section 22-.304.2, and are .set 'to minimize offste lighting,
glare, and sky glow. The performance standard of Section 22-304.2 requires that
March 1', 2D10 Page 13 Winzler & Kelly
0205507008
EAST 1NASHINGTON PARK PROJECT
FINAL MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION/°RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
indirect glare shall. riot exceed that value which is produced by an ,illumination of
the reflecting surface; not to exceed .3 foot candles (maximum) and .1 foot candle
(average;). Indirect glare is defined as illumination visible at the lot line of the
establishment caused by diffuse.reflection fforn,,.a; surface such..as a wall or roof of
a structure. All .exterior lighting shall be directed onto the project site and access.
ways and shielded "to' prevent glare and intru"sion onto adjacent residential
properties 'and the airport Light. measurements shall be^ taken by an .independent
third party with experience in sports field' lighting.
Mitigation Measure~HAZ 1: Traffic Control Procedures
The .City of Petaluma shall adopt standard. traffic. control procedures to minimize
traffic congestion an_d .traffic, hazards during construction. Construction flagging
and ignage, use of plates,. and other safety measures shall'be"in conformance with
Caltrans 2003 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control' Devices. Other measures shah
include: "
® If temporary lane or street closures .are required', "the applicant. shall contact
emergency response providers (hospitals, polices fire; and ambulance) to
determine if the streets impacted are considered primary routes.
o Where .construction .necessitates lane or street closures along emergency
response routes, the applicant shall recommend and obtain. approval of
alternate routes for other means from the affected service providers, at a
minimum of one~i~week prior to construction.
® During construction; ,the, .applicant shall notify the service providers . on a
weekly basis of the=timing, location, and duration of traffic disruption.
The City aha~ll maintain ;pedestrian and vehicular access to. public facilities,
businesses, and residences along the. street during., commute hours and shall
minimize the closure of pedestrian and vehicular access at other times. Peak
commute hours are between 7:0:0 A1VI and 9Q0 P1VI and between 4:00 PM and
6:00 PM.
Mitigation Measure~~CR-1': Protection ofArchaeoloQical Resources"'and Human,
Remains.
After approval of final., construction plans, and prior to any ground disturbance, a
professional archaeologist shall be retained to.. prepare an Archaeological
Monitoring. Plan (AMP) to be 'implemented.~during .construction of the project.
Prior to the plan's implementation, the City of`Petal'uma should review the AMP
for appropriateness:and final approval. TheeAMP!shall include:
m A review of final construction ~ plans in regard to the location and
extent of the proposed ground disturbance;
March 1, 201.0 Page 14 Winz/er & Kelly
• 0205507008
2~
' ~ EAST'WASHINGTON PARK PROJECT
FINAL MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION/'RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
• A -detailed description of methods.. to be employed during
archaeological monitoring; ,
®~~ A~°deescription of the steps to~"be!~takeri~~if,cul~tural~~~materials (including
humari~ remains) are uncovered:
i
, , ,
~.
~~
March 1, 20'10 Page .1;5 Winz/er & Kelly
0205507008
21
,~ .
,
{, H ,
EAST 1NASHINGTON'PARK PROJECT
FINAL.MITIGATED'NEGATIVE DECLARATION/`RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
1VIINOR C>FIANGE' TO THE.;PitOJ~CT
,. ~
After the IS/Proposed MND was circulated` for public ..comment, the City found that a
booster ,pump station and a 2;L09 gallon holding tank would be required. to ensure
adequate pressure for potable' water use by the. project., The booster pump station and
tank`would be located-along the eastern side of the access driveway near the entrance to
_gt Street: (see Figure 2). The pump station component would
the :Park on East Washm on ~~
consist of two 15 horsepower pumps located in an approximately, 5-foot tall metal contro]
cabinet. The 2,100 gallon ~ vertical holding tank would be approximately 7.25 feet in
diameter and 7.5 feet tall ,and; would. be located adjacent. to the. pump. station. The tank
.and- control cabinet would be 1_ocated on .a 16-foot long,.by 8-foot: wide cement slab and
surrounded .by the 8-foot tall, redwood privacy fence (described, in the IS/Proposed MND
Project Description). .
The pump. station would not :increase water use on the sited and therefore, the evaluation
of water demand and utilities 'capacity would not change. The only sections of the
IS/Proposed MND which-require further evaluation are Noise and Visual Quality. -
7. iVoise
p ~ned that activities occurring at East Washington Park would
The IS/Pro osed-MND determ„
not' generate noise levels. above local.,. standards but would cause a substantial intermittent
increase in ambient noiselevels at nearby sensitive receptors. -F''or .example, the maximum
noise generated during athletic activities at the Park. could :result in noise levels at the
nearest residence that range from. about 46 to 60 dBA:'LmaX. In comparison,. the ambient
noise levels at the nearest residence in the evening range from:. about 40 to 50 dBA.
Noise associated with, the,'two. 15 horse ower booster
p pumps would. be minimal, :however
may range from 45 to SO dba. Without mitigation, the impact.from,the interrnttent,noise at
the park and the pump'•, station would be considered significant. However, the project
includes an 8-foot high privacy fence. along the site's northern:, property boundary and the
fence will surround the.' pump station control cabinet. This fence would be constructed so
as to also act as a noise;,,barrier The.desgn for the fence would be reviewed by a qualified
acoustical specialist prior to issuance of a building permit to :confrm that the selected
fence .design would act as~ !an .effective noise barrier.. The ,presence of this fence would
reduce impacts by .approximately `10 dBA, therefore impacts at adjacent residences would
be less than significant.
8. Visual"`:Quality and' Aesthetics
The., booster urn - sfaf'
p p ion ,would be .located behind a fence similar to the proposed
property-boundary fence analyzed in the IS/Eroposed MND, It would not be visible from
East Washngton,;Street or from the neghboring;residents. Visual .impacts were found to
be~ less than s`ignf cant. in he IS%Proposed MND, ~!~and would remain less than significant
with the addr'tionrof the pump station.
..,
„;
March 1, 2090 Page 16 Winz/er & Kelly
0205507008
2?
EAST'1NASHINGTON~:PARK PROJECT
FINAL MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION/ RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
C>EIANGES TO T)FIE CE"QA GiJII)E>LYNES
mended
QA, Gu'i'delines Appendix G, which contains ; he ~~IS/Pro ose questions 'for the Initial
Study Checklist, has been updated subsequent to, tecom p , d MND being circulated
for public comment. The ~~following text presents the changes to the .Initial Study
questions '.(using strike-through and underline mode)' and the evaluation of potential.
project impacts related to'the updated questions:
,,
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
A new set of questions on greenhouse gas emissonss'has been added to the Initial Study
Checklist as follows:
a) ,Generate; greenhouse gas :erizissions, either directly or indirectly„ that may have a
si~rrificanf impact on the environment?
b) Conflict with an applicable
reducing th'e. emissions of'Qreen
,~
Ln anticipation of these. changes to the Initial Study Checklist, the IS/Proposed MND
included an evaluation. of the project's: contribution to greenhouse gas emissions in
Section 4. Air"Quality. No further evaluation is needed. '
10. Transportation/Traffic
Three questions were changed and one was deleted. as follows:
a)
~•°'~•°°~~'~~•~°'? Con rct with an 'a licable lan, ordinance or olicy establishin
measures of effectiveness fore 'the:" performance of'the .circulation system, taking into
account all modes of"'transp'ortation including mass transit.and non-motorized travel and
relevant components of'the circulation. system; including but not limited to intersections,.
b) ,, ' ' - Con, flirt with,. an. applicable congestion
managementprograrri; 'including, but' not limited to~level of service standar,.ds and.travel
demand measures, or other:'standards. established by" the' county' congestion management
g_ yf g a or hi h,
a enc " or desi` n . ted roads g. ways?
ivith~~~~adopted policies, plans; or programs regarding public transit; bicycle,
March 1, 2010 Page 17 Winz/er & Kelly
0205$07008
23
` ~ ~ EAST'WASHINGTON`PARK RROJECT
i FINAL'MITIGATED NEGAl'IVE pECLARgTION/ RESPONSETO`COMMENTS
a & b) The IS/Proposed:lVlN'D evaluated traffc:mpacts,.;including conflicts'with existing
plans and accounting •for~all modes ~.of'transportaton; 'specifically pedestrian and bicycle.
p P
MtigationtlVleasure HAZ ltempact were found to it services. ~-With implementation of
be~ less than, sigrifi'cant.
f) The question :regardi~ng~ parking, was removed~frorn~~ .the Initial Study Checklist in the
20.1'0 update. The IS/Proposed-,MND found~~tl'at `the Project would have adequate
parking.
gf) ~~ p ". conflicts with policies,, plans, or programs regarding
The IS/Pro osed MND .evaluated
public: ,transit, ~~bicycle or pedestrian facilities, iri particular whether the performance and
safety of these facilities would,. be adequate to serve the' Park 'With implementation of
Mitigation Measure HAZ=~1,' impacts'were found to be'1'ess thar'signif'cant.
16. Agriculture-and..forest Resources
The Agriculture Section has~two new questions and'a~~modified~guestion as°follows:
d) Result in the loss-o~forest and:~or,conversion?
„~
de) Involve other changes , an the 'existing environment° which, due, to their location or
nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non=agricultural use or conversion of
,forest land to non; orest. use?
c) The site is not zoned,for forest -land or timberland. No:mpact would occur.
d & e) The East Washington .Park Project would not result in a loss of forest land or
conversion of forests. No impact would occur.
March 1, 2010
Page 1'8
Winzler & Kelly
0205507008
2~
Code section 511~04'(g1
EAST WASHINGTON PARK PROJECT
FINAL MITIGATED NEGATIVE,'DECLARATION/ RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
~Y ,,
,.,~'
COMMENT LETTER 1,. KATY $AMCMEZ, PROGRAM ANALYST, NATIVE AMERICAN.
HERITAGE'COIVIMIS$ION ~ '
Response to Comment 1-1
A records search was conducted at the Northwest Informaforr Center (KWIC) of the
California ,Historical- Resources Information System (NWIC file # 07=1004) on January
15, 2008, as partof thecultural°resources study carried out 'specifically 'for this project by
the Anthropological Studies Center '(ASC) at Sonoma State University. See page 73 of
the Draft EIR for a dessrip"tion of the records search f ndirigs.
Response to Comment 1-2
The' final cultural resources study was submitted to NWIC and Winzler & Kelly in
February, 2008._ The results of the: cultural. resources study was the basis of the 'analysis
,_
in the Draft MND (see page 73 ofthe Draft MND). '
r
Response to Comment'1'=3
~.
The.. commentor requested that the City contact the Native American Heritage
Commission (NAHC)' for a~ sacred lands file.,check and for a list of appropriate Native
part' of the ounces study, ASC
American contacts for consultation. As cultural res
q _ y he Native American Heritage
re uested a review of the Sacred Lands File b. „ t
Commission (NAHC) on January 1~5, 2008. Additionally;;aspart of the cultural resources
study a letter was sent fo the'Native -American contacts°-that was provided from NAHC.
A copy of the letter was appended to the cultural resources, study.
ommittee of the Federated
Nick Tipon, representative of the Sacred Sites Protection C'
Indians of Gratgn Rancheria (PICK), was contacted .by~rteleplione 'and letter ~ori January,
15, 2008. Acting. on behalf of FIGR~ Mr. Tipon responded with a letter dated. January 29,
2008, presenting. tribal concerns and recommendations ~ regarding the need. for an
"Archaeological Monitoring' Plari" and. a "Treatment Plan".
As of March 30, 2009;'no other re'spopse has been. received.
Response to Comment 1;-4
Thee cultural;resources study" contained detailed. recommendations for the City to follow in
the event. of~the discovery of unanticipated archaeological resources and human remains:
These recommendations were incorporated.irito Mitigation,Measure CR-I in the project's
Draft MND and Mitigation. Monitoring Program.
In summary, if"unanticipated archaeological materials or human °remains are uncovered,
work at the place of discovery,, shall `be halted immediately until. a qualified archaeologist
March 1, 2010 Page 79 "' Winzler &' Kelly
0205507008
2~
EAST WASHINGTON PP;RK PROJECT
FINAL MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION/'RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
can evaluate the archaeological "materials. In the. unlikely event that; human remains are
encountered, .excavation or other°disturbance shall be halted in the vicinity of the find and
the .county coroner contacted. If the coroner determines 'the remains .are Native
American, the coroner would contact the Native American Heritage Commission for the
name of the person or persons believed to be the most; likely descendent of the deceased.
The most likely descendent would recommend the preferred treatment of the remains.
March 1, 20~1~0 Page 20 Winz/er & Kelly
0205507008
Z ~-~!
EAST WASHINGTON PARK PROJECT
FINAL MITIGATED NEGATIVE'C)ECLARATION/ RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
COMMENT LETTER 2, CHARLES: ARMOR, REGIONAL MANAGER, CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OFFISH AND' GAME-BAY DELTA REGION
Response to Comment 2-1
The California Department of Fish -and Game (CDFG) submitted a comment on
Mitigation.lVleasure BIO-4 regarding impacts to jurisdictional wetlands. While potential
temporal loss of wetlands was ,addressed in this mitigation measure,, CDFG'~s comment
clarified its mitigation requirements :for such impacts. 'Mitigation Measure BIO-4 in the
Draft MND will b"e ameride'd as follows to reflect this clarification.
Mitigation Measure: B10-9'°=Avoid Fill of Jurisdictional' Wetlands
The City of~"Petalurria shall .avoid fill of jurisdictional `wetlands, to the extent
feasible. If fill cannot ~be: avoided, the City-shall compensate ..for these impacts by
creation or restoration of wetlands so that 'there is no net loss of wetlands.
Measures may include:
Removal of edimerits and foreign materials deposited by construction activities
from jurisdictional wetlands.
Restoration of disturbed wetlands to original. contour and hydrologic conditions.
Purchase of ~wetl~and bank ,mitigation credits at a ~ '1_1 ratio or as determined ~by
resource agencies.
Creation of compensatory acreage to mitigate temporar,~ and permanent. impacts
at a ~ 1_1 ratio or as determined by resource agencies. Compensatory wetlands
shall be in-kind located within the. same: watershed: as the impacted wetland, if
,feasible. Out-of-"kind compensatory wetlands, if constructed, shall provide equal
or greater wetland function and value than impacted waters.
talc~~e~=aad~~e~°' .,,~+'^~a ^'^^*'^rt° A monitoring and
mana em~ent plan shall `be developed to ensure the successful. establishment of the
in
March 1, 2090 Page 21 Winzler & ,Kelly
02:05507008
2'7
EA$T W,4SHINGTON PARK PROJECT
FINAL MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION/'RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
COMMENT LETTER 3, PING WAI CHAN, HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES SCIENTIST,
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCE CONTROL
Response to .Comment 3-;1
The Draft N1ND found that the project site was not listed on any of the databases which
report on former or current underground fuel storage tanks, .or which report. leaks, spills,
g The: graft MND also found that
or dischar es of hazardous materials to the environment.
the project is not listed on the Cortese database 'list. The commentor requested a more
thorough analysis of the property's historical uses in order to determine is the project is
located on a hazardous materials site.
A review of historic aerial photography of the site was conducted in February 2009. The
intent of the review was'to provide a more thorough analysis of the property's historical
uses to determine if hazardous materials could have. been located on the project site.
Historical aerial. photos were reviewed for the proposed park ocation, including photos
from the years 1953; 1965, 1982, L993, 1998, and 2005;, which is compatible with ASTM
standards for Phase 1 environm' 'ental ..site assessments.. See' Figures 4-9.
The historical photos from 1'.95:3, 1965; and 19.82 showed `that the property was the
northern and eastern portion o€ a .larger square-shaped farm.:. Afarm-house was located
to the south of the. property... The aerial photos do not. show any buildings or storage
containers on the property.
The photo from 1993 showed'that the property remained fa'rrriland. What appears to be a
road traverses the property from' west to east. It does,not appear that any structures were
located on the property,. though the quality of the ,aerial photo :is poor.
The photo from 199.8 showed that the property was left fallow and no longer farmed.
The apparent road shown on' the '.1,993 aerial photo' was no ;longer present. An object
appears on the northeastern corner of the property, the- shape of which resembles an
airplane. It is not certain, but; hey object could be a plane flying over -the property at the
time that the aerial photo was, taken. The 1998 photo al"so showed disturbed soil on the
property as indicated by 'the white sandy blotches shown on the southwestern portion of
the property.- It does. not appear that any structures were located on the property. The
photo also showed that the golf course had -been constructed to the south of the property.
The photo from;2005 matches present day.
Because .of the fanning activity on the- site; it is assumed' that= tandard farming practices
were: employed; including the application .of pesticides. However; the historic aerial
photos do `nqt 'indicate. that hazardous substances were stored .at the project. site because
no ;structu'res ,or barrels were present on-situ. If pesticides were used on-site, the practice
continued' at the latest in 1998 when'the property was purchased by 'the City of
was dis
Petaluma.. Additionally, the site was rough graded in 20.01.
Based on the "aerial photo review and the results .of the Environmental Data Resources
discussed in" the Draft 1VINID, it is determined that the project is not located on a
March 1, 209'0- Page 22 Winzler & Kelly
0205507008
2
EAST WASHINGT,ON.PARK PROJECT
FINAL MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION/ RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
hazardous materials site. The project would not pose a signif cant hazard 'to the public or
the environment,. and no mitigation, is required.
Response to Comment 3-2
Although not a comment on ,the analysis conducted for the Draft MND, the City
acknowledges the comment. In the event the City requests! oversight from either the
California Department. of Toxic Substance Contro_1 (Berkeley Office) or the San
Francisco Bay Regional Water "Qua'lty Control Board, 't_ will be requested in the manner
prescribed in the comment letter:
IVla,rcli 1:, ,2.0'.10 Page 23 Winzler & Kelly
0205507008
29
Letter 1
NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMPSSItaN
915 CAPITOL MALL, ROAM 364
.SACRAMENTO, CA 9581'4
(9] 6),853-4082
(916):657-5390 -Fax
January 12; 2009
Erica Ahman
City of Petaluma
1'1 English Street
Petaluma; CA 94952
RE: SCH#2008122112 Easf Washing#on.Park Project; Sonoma County.
Dear Ms. Ahman:
1~4`~~LS' ~~+5.
.__._
it
rig
The Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) has reviewed"the Notice of'Completion (NOC) referenced above.
The California Envirohmental Quality Act„{CEQA} states that any pro]ectthat causes a,si3bsfantia! adverse change In the
significance of an hisforical,resaurce;which includes archedlogical resou"rces, is a significant,effect requiring the preparation of
an.Ell2 (CE(~AA Guidelines 15064(b}). 'To complywith this provision•the lead agency°is^required''to assess whetherthe project
will.havean.adverse impact on historicaC:resources within'the area ofproject.effect'(APE), and. ifso to mitigate that effect. To
adequately assess and mitigate project-related".impacts to archaeological resources; the NAHC recommends the following
actions:
1-1 / Contactthe appropriate regional arctiaeoiogical Information Centerfoea record search. Ttie record. search wilt determine:
^ If a part or all of the area of.'projecfeffect{APE)•has been previously surveyedforcultural resources.
• If any known cultural resources'have.alreadybeen.recorded on or'adjacentao the APE.
If the probability is low, moderafe;;or-high that cWtural resources are located' in the APE'.
If a survey'is required to;determinewhether previously unrecorded "cultural, resources are present..
1-2 / if ah archaeological inventory sunreyi§ required,the final stage is the preparation! of a;professional report detailing; the
findings and recommendations~ofthe records search and field survey.
^ The final report containing.,site forms, site significance, and, mitigation measurers should.be submitted immediately
to the planning department.. All information regarding site Iocations;,;Native~Ameiican human remains, and
associated funerary objects should;be in ,a separate.confdentia) atldendum; and notbe made available far pubic
disclosure. ,
^ The final.written report should 6e~submitied within 3 months after work•has been completed to the appropriate
reaionai archaeo[ogical,dn""formation Center.
9e Comm
Contact the Native American, Henta
1-3 ^ A Sacred Lands l=ile Check USGS ~ssion„for
'7 5.ininute:quadraneale name, township,:range.and section required.
A list of a ro riate NativeAmerican conta
^ pp p ` cts°for consultafiori concerning tiie project site and'to assist in the
mitigation riieasures. NativeAmerican t3ontacts Lisf°attached.
1-4
• Lead;agencies should include'in their mitigation plan provisions"for the•identification and-evaluation of accidentally
_ ,
discovered arcfieolog'rcal resources,;:per Califomia.EnvironmentafiQUality-,Act.{CEQA);§15064.5(f): In areas of
identified archaealogicatsensitivity, a~certified archaeo~ogist•:and,a'culturally affiliated Native American, with
knovvledgein cultural resources, should monitor alhground<disturbng activities.
^ Lead agencies~should include rn their mitigation plan provisions,for=the "disposition of recovered artifacts; in.
consultation with culturally affiliated Native Americans.
Lead,agencies should include provisions for discovery. of'Native Amencan human remains;,in;theirmitigation plan.
Health and.Safety Godei§Z050.t5; CEQA §1:5064.5{e) ~and,t?ublic Resources.Code §509Z:98.,mandatesttie
process to, be followed in the event of an accidentaliiscov.ery of.any human remains in a location other than a
dedicated'cemetery.
Sincerely; ~ •
lCatynchez
Program Analyst
CC: State .Clearinghouse
~~
Native American: Contact.
`Sonoma County
January 9; 2009
The Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria
Gene'Buvelot ,:
6409: Redwood' Drive, Ste 300 Goasf Miwok
Rohn'ert Park CA 94928 Sotthern' Pomo
eoastmiwok@aof.com
{415) 883-921.5 Hame
The Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria
Frank Ross
440- Apt. N .Alameda del Prado Coast Miwok
Novato ~ CA 94949 Southern Pomo
rniwokone@.yahoo.com
.(415) 269-6075. •
Ya-Ka-Ama
621;5 Eastside Road Porna
Forestville ~ CA 95436 Coast IVliwok
(707) 887-1541 V1/appo
Ttie Federated Indians, of ,Graton Rancheria.
Greg Barris, Chairperson
6400 Redwood Drive,. Ste 300 Coast Miwok
Rohnert Park CA 94928 Southern Porno
coastmiwok@ aoLcom
707-566-2288
707-566-2291 -fax
Dawn S. Getchell
P.O. Box 53 Coast; Miwok
Jenner CA 95450 Porno
(707) 865-2248
Thls',list`is curre~f oril as~of,ihe date ofahis document.
Y.
DEstribulion of tfils Ilst~does not relieve any'personlof statutory (esponslbillly as deftned,lri`Section 7U50.5:of the Health and
Safety Coi1e,~5ection 5097:94 of the•Pubilc Resaurcgs Code.and Section 5097.98 of ;the Publ[c Resources Code.
s only applicabEe for,cantacting'IocaUNatlve Americans with re and to cultural resource
This fist I ~ 9 _ ~ , y g s for the proposed
. .__
8CH# 20081221;12 East Washin ton.Park Rra ect,SOnoma:Caunt .
3I
Letter 2
_.__~..
4 ~; a }
~°
- .: ,%
State ofCal.ifornia -The Resources Agency ARNOLDSC,HWARZENEGGER,Governor
DEPA'RTME'NT OF F15H AND GAME ~ $`
http//www.dfg.ca.gov ~ ~ :.
POST OFFICEI BOX 47
YOUNTVlLLE; CALIFORNIA 94599
(707)944-5500
January 14, 2009
Ms. Erica Ahman
City pf Petaluma..
11 ~ English Street
Petaluma, CA 94952
Dear~Ms. Ahrnan:
Subject: East 1Nastiington Park Project; SGH #20081221'2, Draft Mitigated Negative
Declaration, City of Petaluma, Sonoma County
The Department of'Fish and Game (DFG) has reviewed th'e above referenced document.
The City of Petaluma (City): proposesto constriacfithe~ East Washington Park which would
consist of three synthetic-turf soccer fields and three natural turf,baseball/softball fields on a
25-acre parcel on East Washington Street, adjacent'to the Rooster Run Golf Course. All six
fields vuould have lights for':night-fime use. The Park: would also include construction of
4 park facility bulldings;.a dirt BMX bicycle course, a 2;4-foot wide access road and 323
parking spaces. The proposed ,project would include an eight-foot high priuacy fence and
berm along the site's. northern property boundary and fencing' around fhe sports field. The
proposed project is located on the'corner of East Washingfr7n Street and Adobe Road in the
City of Petaluma.
DFG is providing comments on the proposed..project°as~a Tr•uste`e~Agency under the
CaGfor•nia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). As trustee for the State's fish :and wildlife
resources, DFG has jurisdiction o erthe conservation, protection, and i'nanagement of the
fish, wildlife, native plants, acid the, habitat. necessary: for:biolagically sustainable populations
of such. species for the benefit-.and' use by the people of'~Galifornia. '
Comments:
2-1 Mitigation, MeaSUre'Bi0-4. This mitigation measure states'that the;temporal loss of
ds shall 'be mitigated by returning the site to its approximate condition an_d 'that any
emlporal ions would be mitigated.: The draft=Mitigated Negative Reclaration (MND}
proposes thaf compensation would be a 1:2 ratio (Irnpacted:cornpensation}, ar a5
defermined by,the' resource agencies, and that femporal compensation would take,the form
of additional wetland' plantings. The mitigation ratio'for tfie temporal Loss wetlands should
be increased fo.a,rninimurri of 1.1:1 to ensure. there is no. net loss of'wetland in the
short-terra. Furthermore, compensatory wetland: planting should include a monitoring and
management plan to .ensure that new wetlands plantings establish. successfully.
Con.servin~ CaCfornia's ~~ildCfe Since 1870
~~,
32
'dls. Erica Ahman
" January 14, 2009
Page 2
DFG appreciates he opportunity tq comment on the pro,po"sed;project. 'We are available to
assist Ctt staff'to mana a fish and wildlife resources ~!f'you have any. questions, please
Y g
contact Mr. Dan Vl/ilson, environmental Scientist, at (707)``-944'-5534:; or Mr. Richard
Fitzgerald, Coastal Habitat Conservation Supervisor,. at (707) 944-55fi8.
Sincerely,
'~ ~/ ~f
Charles Armor
Regional Manager
Bay Delta Region
cc: State Clearinghouse
~3
Linda S. Adams .
Secretary for
'Environmental Protection
February 2, 2009
`,1
Department of Toxic Substances Control
Ms. Erica Ahman
City of Petaluma '
11 English Street.
Petaluma, California 949:52
Dear Ms. Ahman:
Maureen :F. G,orsen; Director
700 MeinzAvenue
.. .
'Berkeley, California 94710-2721
~I^;LI
5 2009
Letter 3
,~~-=~ ..
~ -',
.~~~,..~
3-1 Thank you for the .opportunity to comment on the Draft Revised Initial Study /Proposed
Mitigated Negative Declaration (Draft;;RIS~)forthe East`Wasfiirgton Park Project (Project}
located at East Wash'i'ngton Street and Adobe road, Petaluma, Sonoma, California, APN
136-Ofl7-031 (Site}. As you may"be aware, the California Departrment:of Toxic Substances
Control (DTS•C} ouersees the cleanup of sites where hazardous substances have been
released pursuanttq the California Health and Safety°Code;:Division 20', Chapter 6.8. As a
potential R'esportsi6'le Agency4, DTSC is submitting comments to ensure that the
environmental documentation. prepared for this project. to address the California
y y q( j g yy esses any required remed_iation
activities whichmaalbe recua ed to addtless an I ha adrdous substances release.
The Draft RlS'~ does not include a thorough description of the property's historical. uses,
without this informafion we are,unable `to determine whether hazardous substances may.
have been released into the soil .at'the Site. 1Ne strongly recorrimend that a historical
assessment of past uses be .done. ,Based, on. that information, .sampling should be
conducted. to determine whether (here is an issue which will need to be addressed in the
CEQA compliance document. If`hazardous substances-have been released, theywill need
to be addressed .as part`"pf this project:
For example, "if the remediation activities include the need for soil excavation,; the•CEQA
document should include: (''1)•an assessment'of air:iirlpacts and' health impacts associated
' ~ on activities; (2)'identification afany applicable'localstandards which may
wlththe excauati
be exceeded bytle excavation':activities, including°;dust levels. and ngise; (3) transportation
impacts firom'the reri~oval or remedial activities; and (4) risk of upset should be there: an
accident-at the Site. •
3-2 DISC and th. a Regional Water Quality Control' Boards (Regional Boards) signed a
Memorandum. of'Agreement,,'March 1, 2005 (MOA) aimed. to avoid duplication of efforts
among the agencies in'the regulatory oversight of investigation and cleanup activities at
Brownfield sites. Under the MOA `anyone requesting oversight from DTSC or.a Regional
Printed on Recycled'"Paper
3~
Ms. Ahman
February 3, 2009
Page 2
y i.
Board must submit an applicatioon fo initiate the process to assign theappropriate oversight
agency. The completed application and site inforrnatian maybe submitted to either DTSC
or ,Re tonal Board, office
g' in your ,geographical area. The .application is available at
htt~//www.calepa.ca ~Gbrownfields/MOA/applicationpdf;
Should you have any questions, 'please eonfact me at (5'1.0) 54'0 -.38'12 or email me at
ychan@dtse.ca.gov.
Sincerely,
r=,
t
Ying VNai Chan
Hazardous Substances: Scientist
Brownfields and Enuironmenfal Restoration Program
Berkeley Office
cc: Governor`s Office of Planning and Research
State Clearinghouse:
F'. O. Box 3044
Sacramento, California 95812-3044
Guenther Moskat
CEQA Trackirig Center
Department of Toxic Substances Control
P.O. Box 806 '`
Sacramento, California, 9.5812=0806
3
r ~ .. o .. .
• _~ wll! r~„ !~ p~e4scs ins ~'p~rl9d gl thirty d~~~
JANlCE ATKINSON, Co. Clerk
BY•
DEPIf LERK
1VOT~C~" OF IN7~EN'T TO ADOPT, A,
`lY~TI~ATED N~GATI'VE DEC~ARA'I'~ON
East Washington Park ]Project, City of"Petalurxlia
NOTICE. IS HEREBY GNEN that the City of Petaluma; has prepared a draft revise.
Mitigated Negative Declaration, pursuant to the requrements'of CEQA, for the City's East
Washington Park Project.
The East Washington Park Project consists of three synthetic-turf soccer ;fields and three
natural-turf baseball softball fields on a 25-acre parcel on--East Washington .Street, adjacent
to the Rooster Run Golf Course'. All .six fields"; would hake lights for .nighttime use. The
Park would .also. include construction of four park facility buildings; a dirt. BM. X bicycle
course; a 24-foot wide access roads and 323 parking spaces. The. Project would include an
eight-foot high. privacy fence and berm along the site's northern property boundary and
"fencing around the sports fields: Conslruction of the Project has been divided into two
phases.. Phase 1 of the Project would construct three, synthetic turf fields and associated
lighting, access road, I59 parking spaces, Class 1 bike lane "from Rooster Run Golf Course
to the Parlc site and aright-tum ,lane into, the site. The Project is not located on a hazardous
materials site or on a list underSection 6596?.S of the Goveinment Code.
The City of .Petaluma adopted a Mitigated Negative :Declaration (MND) in July 2001 for
the Redwood Empire Sporesplex Association (RESA) on the same site as the East
Washington ;Park Project.:In early 2006, the City began. eonsideratott of the site as a park
to be operated and maintained by the 'C.ity. The East Washington Park Project consists of a
sportsplex similar to the sportsplex described and evaluated in the July 2001 HIND. The
City 11as concluded that a revised MND "is necessary for the East Washington Park Project,
because site conditions and some of the project compo~entshave changed.
The proposed MND for the:East"Washington Park Project,will be available for fire public's
• y ary ~ roubh Monday, February 2; 2009.
review and comment from Thursda ,Jams 1, _009 th
The proposed NIND and documents referenced in it will be available for review at the
Public Works office located at, the address. below.,, and at the Petaluma Library. Written
comments .are due by Monday, February 2, 2009 and may be .delivered to the following
address:
^ City of Petaluma, Public Works Department
1 I English Street
Petaluma, California, 94952
Erica Ahman, P:E.
Phone: (707) 7'16-3673
The Petaluma City Council will consider adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration
during a regularly scheduled meeting on, a 1S` or 3`¢ Monday. Please check the City's
website for thee. date: littp•//cityofpetaluma.net/cclerk/archiyes.htn~l. The meetings begin at
or around 7:00 pm at the City Council Chamber, 11 'English Street, Petaluma, California
94952. "
3
AAC~~9E~VT 4
~ Ap.pend?x A
~ZOZ
~Qa
~ ~ Z
d
~' W~
d~Z
z>coc
Q ~ G
(-~' O
Z: W ~
Z Q
~ ~(.~
>Q W f-
> Q ~
~ ~ I
Q H Q
W ~ X_
Z
W
d
a
Q
~
~ U in
~ •~ C O O aU+ bq C~-
C
a~
.'
~
U
~
N ~~~~ ...v E ~
c
f]7
.
.
' ~ U ~
~ ~ ~ C ~ OVA ~ by ~ ~
. C
C ~
~ A. ~ O
~ O > ~ O
V v ~
x ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ Y
~
Q
m ~,
O ~ c C7
;
o ~
E
~
L
~
~ C
~ bq
~ ~ CA
~ ~
C R C O O O O
~ i
C .O
~ ~ cc2
s. C1. qp ~
C y ~ bA
C~
O O
CCO a Q 0.. ¢ '~ C
U ~,p G'
tiA O
G i Q ~
U
fs. ~ ~
G
w. 0 4-
0
0
0
+~
C Q o
O °
O X
~ o
U
O
_~ U
r
'~
CQ.
~
~- ~
~- ...
E"' , 0. U
t1 0
. C
O Q C
O
C
r. O
cC cC c~
~
u ~ ~
c ~ ~ ~
•i .a a. a a,
0 0 0
°
U y ~ ~''
U U U
a~ :X ~ c -v
~~ ~
'
s ~~a 3 v ~; No
s ~ o~no~° ~ ~ o ~ o ~ .Y
a a0.Y'~ s o3~~-'~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~°~
~ .~ ~ ~ o ~ ~
~ ~~ ~ ~o ~ ~ ; ~ .X ~ o .o
. ~ ,
~ 0 ~ ~ own ~ _o~ U .°n ~ ~ c~ an °~ o `3 ~- '~ `~ -0 .
w
~~ Y
F
O R U U LL] N ~ ~ C fV ~ biA ~ pp, ~
~n--.
~ ~+ •B ~ •B ~ •>? ~ ~ cn 3
•~,~, () U ~ ~ »- `n .~
N. N ~' •~. 4-=. O ~ ,r0.. c~ U ~ O N O i
00
~ 'a
• 3 0 E :~ a o ~ c ° ~ ~, ~
°A ., 3
o c = o
' „ ~ a~ U ~
^ o o ~ ~ ~ °
°' ~ '° a~ '~
a~ ~ ° ° 3 ~ °' ~ ~ 3
U
a
i
> ~ ~. o ~ ~s ~ ~
_
~' _
o
Y U .fl N. ~ U Q N VJ •~ Y ~
'
i Y~ N O L C ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ N ~ i N .) U L 3 ~ 3 ~ ~ f1.
vOi. ~ N ;~ ~ H O vOi ~r Oi' ~~ C
~ ~ O ~ ~v=i. ¢' ~ Y ca ~'O ~' bA ~ N
_
- .YO ~ a
O ~
~ '
~ O
O ~~ c ~ ~ O ~ 0. ~
0. ~
~
~ .~ .~
cci
~ .
Y iC
•~ c
-.
G
O
O 0.
' O j ~ +
-'
0 •
0
C N O, w
~ ~
~ ~ ~ Y
C ~ N ~
O ° ~, o
a C ~
c ~ ~ ~ ~
o ° j
~ - ~ a
i .II
3 ° a
i O
3 c
.
_a
o
N O
Y ~
~ O
rv N
G ~
m
E
3. ~
~ O
O
N N
a
o~
C
+~. 3
U ~
3'~
F- z.z
~~`~ a
~ ~ ~
~_g z
Y U ~
W,;~
4~Z
Zj0
O~~
~~O
Z.W -
=ZQ
~~C7
Q W ~
~a~
~ ~ I
Q H Q
W, ~ X_
Z
W
d
a
Q
~ 0. O
~ °~
~ GYl ~ F
~-
c ~
~ ~
o ~
o E ~
Q
'~ ~ ~
c
b1D
o
c
~ c
c c c o 0 0 0
U
+ a+
a.
~~+ ~ L
C ~
C Y
~ ~
C ~n
O O
'~ y A .bD O bA O
y„ ~ U ~ U
~' 0
C
w o
0
0
CA ~
U ~~U C v
C Q •% 7
CQ
~ w.
C
~
~~
F O
~ C
O
^.
~ ~
u
C
~
tQ
~ N ~
i- p, 0. f3.
E O O
U ~;' ~'
U U
o
.~ ~ c ~ ~ ~
~,
~ i
p
O O
O
¢ O
U ~
U cC ^p
v,
^~ Y U <n
ti
O O
~ ~ ~
~~ ~ Y ~
o ~
a ~ ~ ~ ~ c
R^ o 3 _~ ~
D
c
c c c ~ . o
a> O ~ > ~ ~ ai ~ '-' O O O O .~ O ~
>~ ~ ~ N, Y v O U C V C ~~ U V ^p
G' ~ X
>
O
~ ~ ~ y. U N ~ C. 4~ ~ V ~" ~
F-' .O O ..'
by
,
O ~ ~, ~
O T ~ ~
~ O y ~ ~ O
~
°
' C. t].. O
~'
~ ~
~ '~ N
a ~ ~
'~¢' O cn ~
~, ~
.~
E~
~
~ NyS ,~~ ~ a, . O E ~o
4.
a, ~ a~ a ° ~ x 3 ~ ~ E ~_ ' O ~ _'
~ `~ O y c - ~- '~ a- L > c
'~-
p ~ o
^
T ~ ~ ~
~ ~ a
.~ O ~
O ~ ~ ~,.
~ t
cG .C 3
~ ~ .O
~
.G .
bA `
~ ~ > ~~ ~ .~ E
'~ o " ~ o ~ ~ '~ O do v °'
,. Y
~
a~ c a O o a. i
a
~ an ~ ~ ~~ o .E c o
`-' cG N.'~ O O = N ¢. ~ O O c~
a> M c by ~3 ~
bpi
>~ a
d (~ .~ ~ s..
~ O U "U ~
.O
C Y
(~ ~ .,
C '
'
ix
q c
~~n
3
~ .a ~.
O C
~
~
N ~ v
i
7
G
~ ~
.
N
O . ~
,,, :
~:,
«S
~
a ~
, •
~ ~ N
T
' ' Q ~ ~ y N c~ i ~ E
Yv Q ~ ~ ~
~ O. . i 1
~
0 ~ cc3
~ +~
~ ~
~ O
y ~, U O
~ c
~ C ~ .~
G ~ > O
~~ ~, ~ ~-- O
~, ~-
>
0
~ a N..a. ~ fn' ~ U F-" ~ f1. N >l (~ .~ U
~ <.U-
Y O N
O a-.
U ~ ~ ~ N O N
~ ._ ~.
~.
, O
.a ~
it Y .
E t bq
`n O U N , . O-
7 '
~ O .L t
`n Ll L ~"" U
`n 'C3 +...
p ~
_ c'_a, W .y _ ~ ~~
W ~ Ci N.
CL O
'+-~ C
~
' i~ ~ ~
f1~ 'G ~ O
a~i Q. O ~ O
Ll ~ '- ,~
O
+-' Y ':n bq
ocA
= ~' bA >p
. bRD _
U¢ bRD U O .
.
~ U Q Q..
~ 0 0 p U p p C a>
•
0 0 o o ® ~ ~ .~, o 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
3 O
U
~_
.O
i..
~'
L
CCt
a
0
b~
~i
S,
CC
W
C
C~
G~
W
~i
.~
O
C
O
O
CC
t~
~~
o
a~ o
Y
~ ~
u, o
N N
_C ~
o m
.V ~.
G
U ~'
3~
~. z'z
U.. o ,~
W~.~ a
°' ~ o
a z
Y U ~
~' lL ~
Q ~ H
awz
z >' o
o~~
ZWo
z. Q
~ 4 C~
Qw~
Q ~
~ ~ I
QF-Q
W~_X
Z
W
a
a
a
~" 0
°
~ z
Y
~ .
~
' ~' ~
~
U
Q
p-
'B
E ~
~ ~
cn
~
c ~ ~ o 0
•~, >, o ~,
~. R
C y y_
7 ~
bA
~ ~ ~ O
L
~L ~
O U
c
w o ~
0
u
c Q
.
~ ~,
~ ~
ER ~ ~
E_ ~ Q ~
o
..
~
u
c
~'
to
w
.
.
a
L a
~ o
0
~
U
V ..
o ~ ~
G 3 N
~ LL p ~
~' ~ ~ ¢•
~
~
~ .
0
> p ~
~..
p
.,
O o - y
~ on a ~ ~
i
i a
a
~
~ 3 ~
, ~
~ ^ ~
~
•
°
°
~ ~,
~ ~
~
O
ms
v ~«°
O i ° ~~ ~ ~.,
2
~^ a
O vi N rn °' c'
'
C
N O cC ~ ^,,~_, 0 .~ E
- ~ •~ ~ o
n ¢.
... ,.,
E T
~ ~ ~
a.. .
.
s ..~ -p Y w
~ ^ Y
~
0 3 Y ~ ~ ~ ~
a ~ ~
~ +~.
L
~ ' N
b
~ ~ ~ ^O ~C
U '
~
t-, id
O , ~
p U ~, c
~ c
d
.
U .~ C r y A
•~
C ~
.
m p cC 'II
.
C O ~
~
•
O D y
bA ~~ p~
N
O
cC p.
~ s- U O~~ `~ aS ¢ - ~ ~ .p «3 N p C O Ry O- cci ~. -O a-~ ~ Q- cC G
~
~ ~ ~ do ~ v ~ E °' O ,,, ~? ~ 'a `~ b •r1 s..
~ Y ~ ~ '= 'a ._
'
" G
b c~
~ O
O
; ~- O ¢' ~ ~
d ~ .-, Y ~ ~. ~ N. ~
1J ^ ;
rn O
U ~ Y
y
U ~ ~ U
U 3
3
~" ~
0.
:°
o R i b
~ ~ a p ° >
~ ~ .
~
i 4
~ a '
~ ~ ~ ~ n
'. ~
L
~
" C ~'•~ ~ y_ O C a+ O ~ > N G ~--+ ~-.+ G C
C ~ L1
t
' y .
~
O
~ a~ >, :~
Cd'
~ C ~ c
N U ~ O
~ 'p ~
U ~ ~
,p U v N O ~ U
~ C ~
N ~ '. .
- a
-+
~' •O cct ~ •O p v~ ~ ~
'U ~
' C -C "
~ L
y
N ~ p
• _
.
OA ~
~
O N at n .~' C O~~~ O O O~~ ~
N O' •D O O H p p v
er O •
CD U E
..~
~
N ~ O
v
a~
•o'
s.
A.r
s.
a
0
i
C
cC
3
W
~r
CC
bl
C
.~
C
O
C
0
~:+
~~
o
a~ o
Y' l~
~~
~ ~
~ O
N N
,~ O
m
3 ~
l0 ~.
N N
a `
o m
C
~_ ~
U ~
3 1
~-zz
~V O
~~ a
~;~ ~
agz
~'w o
d ~ Z
Zj0
O'er ~
~'~ O
Z W ~
`I~ , Z ~
~ o ~
Q W ~
~,Q
~ ~ I
Q .1- Q
WAX
D
Z
W
a
Q
E
0
U
Q
p~ c
C R =
~i ~ ~
U
O C> L
O = ~
~ ~
LS.
+~' c
V w O
~ O ~,
u
~__a
R
F
CC
W
I
R
0
~.
u
c
w~' C3
.~ •Q
O
U
~ ~ c ~=
~
~ .~ cC
~
X30 ~~ Y
,II p. ~ a~
L1 O a~
.
~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ U
•~ 11 t.
O
C ~ ~ C ~A
-C b
O O
bA
~ ~ y ~, ~,
U
.~
Y ~
°~ 3 ~ •~ p
a~ c ~ ~
~-
Y
_ ~ U _p Y N ~ s
3
a- `°' -o ~ ~
~
w
fi
r~
~ a~ o
~
ps
`
~ L
O O H 4.x
O N O
O a
i
.
~ U.~ ~. °
00
0 ~-o~ ~ a~,
~
.~3
.~
U 0¢¢ ~o
~~,~~3.~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ Y ~
~ ~
~ ¢~0~~ .
~ ~' 3 3 ~ ~
w y 0 ~ O ~~ U
O ~ ~~ ~
U
O ~
~t ~ ~
' Y C
O
~
~ O
A. ~n O
.O ~ N O„ Y L. .~ O ~ N
.
O U~~ O N
. O G C ,U .cC
a
'
. ~::~ Z ~
~ ~ c
~ ~ c
~
~- ~ ¢ ~ U O C .~ ~ a.. Y
,.L, t :~ -p .~ U ~ ~ O ~ ~
ti
O
~
U 'B
¢
O Y N
~
U (~ •
~ C
~ ~ C >
~
'~
~
~
~ ~ c
O .~ p O ;~ sU.. U U vUi O~ U
c c
o ~ o .x o ~ c
o ~ ~ .o
~ U ~
~ b U ~ ~ ..~
~ ~._ a3
U CZa
c
~ ~ ~ ~
U
~ 0 ~ ~ F
•~, s.. O U ~ L
~ U ~ -~
v, F- o. ~ U 0. ~ ~ ~, o
~ ~ o~._
'-' 0 O ~ ~ ~ O O
~ ~
U ~ c
U
C a~+ U cd ~
.O
~ ~ ~
L1
~ ~, vii r-+
r. ~ Y
~ U ~ ~ N ~
~ Q. Q
O O
v
~ . ~,
~
U
~ G
- ~ ~ ~
~
am
c
.~. ~C ~
U i- L~'
.~ ~ ~
4. r..! 'O
N
~ 0 ~
•
on ~ ~ O N .--.
.~ ~ ~~ ~~
~
3 O r ~ ~ O 3
~ ~ ~
G .=
~ y
' • ~ ~ O ~
o~~ O cC
N
~
~~ ~~ ~o~~
U o ~~ ~
N
U
:
~ ~
U
~. a a
~
~
.
U .:.. ;.a ~
~ 40.
~ Q ~
~ C
O /y
M~
~ '~ W V O
_ ~.
~ O~~ Y
`~
~
G ~ C ,~, C
~ N y U R
'U ~~
~ ~ d N U y
~
.
U
~ U
'
O
.~. '~:~ '
'O ~ Q N C ~
~ U~ > ~
B C ~ c
C
O s O Rj C O
~
L ~
1-~ N ~ ~ ~
~ N
~ ~~ ~
~ ~ ~
N C G
~
O O ~
°- O ~ ,
U, •~ O
~ c ~~ ~
~ ~ •~ ~
~ U z °' E E
°
3 ~ ~ ~ a~ -a . U ~ ~
a~ E-- ~
~ ~
o
a~ o
Y
o
N N
O O
v
m
E
3 ~
m ~
O
N N
~ ~
o~
c
~_'
U
~~
UZOZ
Q a
~~Z
ag
U
O
a°z
Z
O~~
~C~O
ZwH
=ZQ
~°C7
Q W ~
~Q~
Q F-
Q
Lll~_X
O
Z
W
d
a
Q
~
~ _
c
c c °' ~
~
c ~
~ °- o '~'
N 0 0 7 ~ S U N cd
C
~~ ~
_
a~ `~
O ¢ • ~ y, ,C N ~ ~ O ~
u ~ ~ Q~ E W o~ c
Q O U U
X
V a
i
'o
~
uip c c c
c c c
'y„ >> O
i.. o
U
~ 0
V
u
~ ca
~
~
o
C ~ ~ ~ Q ~ _
s: v'Ji
O y 0 O 0. O
L U U
fs.
C
`~ °_
o
0
o -,.,
N
O
.U
C Q ~ ti.
•~ R Q ~
F- =
c c
o a G
0
.,
~ ~
~ ~
u
c
~ R ~ ~
i
_
~ Q a~
4.. 0.
, O O
U ~' ~''
U U
^ a y .~. w a~ biD a~
~ ~' ~ ~ ``~' `~'
`
'
0
ma
~
~. - ~ ~ ~' ~,
_ a~ ~ ,a a
c >
i O. •
-
~
.
O O N C. s0. U C O~ ~.s O L O~~ U ++ .a ~ U
C N U 4- fl- GJ ~-- L vi aS '~ > U O ~_ N
y ~ a~ Y ~ ~ ~ ~ .a ''' ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ a? ca c t o a~
`" ~ ~ °' ~ ~ ,~ 3 c °; ~ ^ -a o _
a> w ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ono ~ ~ ~ c
a ~ -o a> > s ~ o a~ c ~ ~., ~... ~., p ~ ce ~... a~ ~,.., ~
°
'
~ O o
o
n ~
'~
°
3
.
°
x
~ ~ ~ ~,
3'
~ Y ~ °
' `~•v c^
' 3
o
~ ~s
~•° ° ^,>,
'•
° ~ 3 ~c
tea; ~.,.~
.
tQ E > L j b ~
U N 7 4.
> ~ ~ U' ~ N U N T.
'3-'~ U
L
=
C s:.
; ~ O
6
:
E .
A
~ .
,_, ~
~ ~ _
U ~
.,
~ '' ~
y ,
.
-
.
~ ~'
~ ~ '
~ O ~, c -v
E ~ c x
~
- i~r. O N n ~`~ ~x> ~pU N - L O cC .}' C ~ Ll" t. 'p y +-' OA N rn C ~ O
C ..,
~ s :^
~ ' ~ O
^ N
~
'
y
L .bA
O
~ rn . N
~
.--.
~
:D
O >
~ ~ ~ cc
D C
p
N as
`n ~
~ L v: O
p ~- 3
O ~
.L 6
U
.
~
Y CL . O bA `~ ~..
,3..
T
O
rn U
.
. ~~ ~
+
-
~ iC N vi
~
.
~-• ~
`n
C ~„ c a~
O 3
v, 4•,
O
O O
`~ . N
~ ~
U
~ O ~
fl
Q
~ II
U
~ p a
i
~ .= .
a
~
a .
~ ~ ~ ~
G
~ d
C U ~ .
oA
C O
O
~ ^
v
i ' > ~~ bA C ~ c
d U
~.~-. ~ '"
.. O
. C. ~
° ~ ` ~ U °'°
'
on v
~ ~ •° c c _
o Y ~ ~ ~ ~ p bn ~ a~ O on i
>
o .~ ° ~ o ~ a
~
.~
~ C
~
n bA v'.. `n
>O'a°' t
3 ~ ,.O vi ~
-`
'^ o:a ~ 'O ^ U ~
'
o~ o~ ° -
~ N p O- O
F- E
~M ~~
~ s.. = N N ~ C >
3a`
Y °
' ° o
Fo- a
,
. . 0 _ . .
~
.
~~
o
a~ o
Y ~
V~ ~
i ~
u, o
N N
~ o
m
3 ~
m
0
N N
a
o m
~ ~
G
U
~zz
~ o ,g
Q'a
agZ
Y;U ~
W ~
a°z
wo
o~~
zwo
=zQ
cn p C~
>Q> W ~
~,Q ~
~ ~ I
Q~Q
l1J ~ X
~ ~
°~ ~~
~ c ~
;; ~~
°? c ~
U ~ ~' 'LS E E R O O Q '~ ~~ ~.
~ ~
U
C R =
'~ T O O •~ 0 0 ~~
U ~,
-+ ~
O U
~
•'
O
~ 'O
O O
L
° °" •
~ °
aai G o c o
n
y„ U O
C
C cYG
bA `J ~ ~ ~ ~
~ O
'B
C Q ~,
O ~ c.
O ~ OU
•O
t1.
y Q. o Q. ~
C ~
~
C U O
i
c~ N
~ ~
u
C
~
CQ
.
.
~ N N
a
L C. f1.
G O O
U ~ ~_
U U
_-_ o
Y N
~
'
.~ N
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
U .a O j L ''
N ~ U 'D •cc3 p' rn ~ ~ ~ .t
~ ~ 3 ~ a~ ~
O "v ~ ~ o ~' -o ~. ~ ~ p .~ c _ Zs ~ w- ai ~
~ ~ N.
M l-: ^ U
'
c Ca
~ ~ ~ p y 'O O N 4U.,~ ~' y ~
S~
' C ~ •~ ~ ~ ~ 3
B C .
tS
>, O ~.. y t
53
E
~c ~ N ,L
bA bA
.~ j > .a
RT y ~n O Y
C
,^p, :~ O U s.
O ~ ? ~ 4- O
Q ~ 0
..
.
~ , ~
o.Q~•3~~.~ '~ .~ ~~onY 'TS °c° ~ ~ °:x'~ U ° oti° >'-o Y
an
o
Q-
c Q ~ c~'~ o~ c.n a~
o• '_ ~ oUQ
p
°n
~ o ~`~
C ~ ~ 3..
GA
~
L
Q
~
~
~ •^ ai
p ~ by L
~
1" a
i
6J i]
N
'B C
-+ :
N .
~ , .
Y
~ cs"C ~ ~ p .U _.`+. +~•'.. N U ~ `'O_' G N ~ vi ~ ~ - •.~ T ~ t 7 ~ N ~ ~ LL t1
+-'
' 'U p " `n ~ Q .~
~ Q.,,.y., O~
N •O Lr_. U~
~ C
O Q ~.
c~
c~ +
X •.~ x N. U ,~ ~..0.. C
.O .. ~
00 ~ aXi •U .
y ,.~ ~ O
4-,
U„ LO c~ p ~y O
D
D C
O~ ~
Q- ~ '~ ~ U O
'D
~.
'R.. s=. >. s-. G Y, cC 4.
O ~ O. ~ N ~ O' a=+
U O
•U ~ Y~ ^p bA~'O
•B U ~ :.
.
cC
C7
~ ^p ~
O.~'N a+:
,U N N p ~
~ a~ ._ ~ ~Ui,
/
~
N CC C..., N 4-. ,~ (V ~ O
~. G ,~
~
C L'
Q
LL 'B
C
~
Y
~ Y 4-
N ~
O L
~ N
O ~
~.y
Y,•
.0 ~
~ ~
O ~~.
~
~ ~
N
h N
O .c~ p ~ "} ~ o ,^ .x,. CO ~ :~ 'B' -° 3 - v,
• i 'O p u
i..? a`i'
a
.--. ~ `' ~ ~ ~ ~ °v
O O
. ~ S) ~ p V ~
C 1
3 ~ ~ ~ .-. ~ aD
'.Y p
OA ~- ~~ 3-• Y y tiI ~ C
•.
- C •
7•-; c. U U 7 U Q .~
n.a.~ ~.N `~ Y~.....o ~
ca C v~
o•_ 3 ~, O
'~~~ C; +-~ cC >- Lc:? -fl
c ~ Y;OD ~ H
ca O
v ~ °'o~~a
i
~
~ "
a i ~ ~ i
° ~ `=
~ ~ o c
c ~° 3
a
~'
~ ~ ~ c .~ ~ a do ,~ o c ~ o
•3 y 3~ ~ ~-aii•v ~ EL- i°v~ o`
=' °
` 5 ~ ~
~ ~ Y ~ ~ a` sUriw:o
c
n
, .
~+
V
~_
~O
^^L~
F~1
L
CC
~"
O
bI
~i
Cz~
t~
W
~i
a
da
C
.~
O
C
0
C
O
C~
bl
~, ~
o
a~ o
Y
~~
~~
~ O
N N
C 'O
O l6
>, ~
c
U ~
y 2
i-zz
'U'.O
w¢a
~gZ
a
~w~
a°z
z>O
pF.~
~~O
ZwH
_ZQ
~°C7
Q W~,
Q
~ ~ 1
Q ~_ Q
WAX
°
Z
W
a
a
Q
~.
~,
E 4., ~ ~°
o
~, ^ ~ ~
U
• C
U R
C `~
G> T3
O O..
.a Y
O U O ~ N t1
.
.
3
~ ~
~
~
¢
Q •'_' U
,a "c
bA
bD C O ,C
c_ ca c o;o
V a+ ++
~ L
C O O ~
~ cn
y 0 bA p
L p U
~i. 0
'... O c
O
O ~,
O •
.,
C Q U
~"
0
.~ ~
~_ ~ f3, O
o
~
V
C
~' ~
CQ
~
. N
~ fl Q.
. O
O
U
U
o
'B ~
N °-
~ U ~ R
~ _
i '06 ~ R
' X ~ `n
• U
O
N
Y v
'
N N
i
C. • ~
R.
~ 4-
O ~
J 3
R
~
pU ~ ~. ~
¢
~ ~ L O Li.
~ N .
7
v
i
o
3 0 .
O a
.
~
.~ •~
, O ~
~
o
o ~ o ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
c ~
~
s a~i 3 ~ 0 _
o ~
3 •~ w o ~
'a D
~ o
• ~ cc
~ = ~'o~ ~ cam- ~ ~ ~' ~
Y an y. 3 o ~
Y ~ o ~ ~ ~ > cc ~ ~ ;? ;c ~ : 0 3 aci a> ~ c c
~^
tn. ~ N
,.- Y ~ •V.
~
,II ~ y .yam.,: ~
~V. Q'• G
c
~
'O
~ c~
i a
i
~
y O
C C
~ (, = s"' O .. ~,:., ~ ~; O b4 O .C i-:. ~ ~,•;^ . yr O U c~ ~ ~
"
3 ~, ~ ., ~ a.. ~ o 0 0- ~ ~ y .a ~. ~ o ems, ~ ``- ~ a~ E a~
_ •fl. Q C ¢ ~ 'O M "6 ~ N
~ ,, .D c>>C~ _ 4-=. ~ N.
O '
- .Q. ;a U C
O 'B G O 3
' 1
O ~
~ cm O y..
O cC cC ~ II U
c ~
~ s E o •~ • U c
~
~ ~ s~ o
~ _~ ;~ _ c o
' ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~' ~
~ c.
~ ~ o c -B
o ~ w °'
3 ~
3
.
..
~ ~ ' ~ c o ~ `~' ~ a •~ ~ ~' ~
•~ a
o ~ c •
O ~- o 0 ~ c
N
O _~ 3
~ Y ~ r+ 4- C
O U ~ p c~ ~. a~ U U
~
fi ca j ~ . R R U
V1.
R ~ U ~ ~ ° `~ C
O ., ° U
O
~
i a~i'v~.
~4' N•U
~
~•O .
U~•fl
~ ~ ~'
Y~'
c
~ G
4=
~•~~
~•~
~ ~
~
U
c~ ` ~
~ a
i
~ ~ -
~ a
.
i c
~
~ > ~ 'B `
'- Lt
cG
LL T a~ ~ c~ V (n. 3 C
O ,Li.
6 C ~
'_,' y.
O O ~ .
.
0 ~ ~ '"'
0
p 0
Z !.~ _p N C/)
U O .~.+ ~ .~ C Y O y.
C1. c~ ~ 0.O O N
Li. 'D 0
~ C~ X 0
~ c~ U yU. ~ rn
~ ~ ~
~ a>
V
C~ cC a~
0
f~ U 0
0. ~
.9
0
~ O 0
0 0 0 0 ® ~~~ ~~ o e o U
U
U
~_
~O
L
a
~.
a
a
0
C,"
C~
W
C
^^~
I~1
..r
L.
C
0
c
CC
bl
Y
r i
o m
~, ~
_ c
U ~
~3
z,z
w' °O-'g
~Qa
~~z
a
U
O
~w
Q ~ F"
d. w Z
Z~A
O~~
~~O
Z W H
=ZQ
~0C7
>¢w~
Q..~
~ ~ ~
Q H Q
W ~ X
Z
W
a
a
Q
~ ~
~, ~ - C~C
c 'a
o~ ~~o `~ ~ a
'3
a~
~ ° 'o
c
o bA
'~., ~ ~ .~ ~
~
~- . ., w ;~ a
i c
N
s..
O
~ ¢
N U
'C
pp C
~
C ~
~
C
p i p O O O O
•L a, o
C V .~
~ s
a,_,~ ' c
U ..a O~
• ~
r.+ '
U
~•'
y L
C ~ bA
C ~ cC
~ ~
~n s.. f1 bA
C
~
~
O~ Q
~ N
O O
b
A
U
~ 0 O
`~ ° c
0 c
0
'' U ~
C Q
'
O
~
~^ ~.
~
C3
%
0.
v~
c O
~
~
C
[~ C O O
~ ~
U ~ ~
G
~ ~ Y
~
~ N N
E o 0
U Y ~'
U U
~ O _,
~ ~ 0 4:
N N y. `n O' y~, ^p.
~.
~
' .tC ~ N O ,D C C p 'B
t cC
~ yj
~ ~ O ~ ~' ~.
~ N
~ ~. bA ~
~.
'~
~ C ~ .
y
Y N O 'O
cam. ~ ~n . •p [~ y w
~ ~
.+
'
~
~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ ~. O ~ ~ .fl ~ ~ ~. W ~ ~.. y O ~ •.~. ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~I--~
V1 > :c cC cd
~ O
O ~~ 'B O
~' O `~ O O C/> O
~ s.
. C/1 U O
~ >
iU v~.
N ~ v 6> >' ~ v~ U' .~ .~ ~ C c N ~-
~ .
U Y Ut~~ ~ Y Q ~. ~ ~•a a~.~? a~i'°~3 ° p a`~'i aro `~ °~°
~- ~ ~
..
~ 3 -0 ~ ~w ~ ~ ~ ~,,~ Ems
x~ ~ ~ L ~ o ~s ~ o ~~ o
~ ~• ~
. O cC O 'O bA O U 'O O '_'. U cC f1. `" ~ ~. ~ .Y ~ O +' >, v, '_' ~
~ N v,
N
'D ~ U bA ,~ ~ tU-. ~ ~ p O N N ~ `a ~ '00 ~ ,Q. O N .Q •.; `n ~ N
cY ¢ ~.~,;~ ~ o ~ o o~ 3 ~ ~~-o` i 3 c o'er •E .~
~•
>^~ •~
~ '~ ~
,
. ,
U U
. ~ p,.~ r~ 'N-~ GD O
O .a U Q..II .v ¢. ~ C1D. U
O
~ U C N ~ ~ Ci ~ .C ~ cc
;~ G s ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ of
~~
0
m o
Y
~ ~
. ~
a, o
N (V
c
m
p1
m ~
0
N N
Q
O c0
~ ~
G
U
rzz
wog
~Qa
~gZ
a
~' W 0
a~z
z>o
o ,~
~~o
zw-
=zQ
~oc9
Q W ~
~Q~
~ ~ I
Q F-Q
W ~ X_
Z
W
a
a
Q
E
c
•Y
~n
,r ~ ..
~ ~a~'i•.~
~ ~ =~Y
c
O
_
~
y ~ N v
O
Q ~ w
~ ~
~ c ~ c
c ~ c
•L ~ C o •o
u ~ U
o
c e
G) L
c ~ 7 ~
~ Q p°A O
~ U
~
c
w, o c
°
o ~,
O _
c Q _
O U
E ~ •i ~
F C 0. G
O
~.
c~
u O
C
~' ~
CQ
~ N
> E o
O
U T
Y
U.
~ a~ w a~
~ N ~ s... cC «S ~ Y i... ~ .,`n., «~ by O •,^, U
3 cn Y
c ~° ac c
o .L ° ~ ~ o c ~~~ ~
'E c o
c ~~ ~ O
~ "
O
0 ..
N.
y 'bA
O ~
~
° ~
C
~
0 v~ '
':'
6 v~
a~ a> ,Y Y
a
i, ,
.O .v
t1 "0. O O ~ 'ai ~ c~ ~
a> > c
C O
C C
~ 0. O v C ~ N a~ ~ ~ c~
~. v~
i ~ ~ ~+ iC U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C cC U C7.a N ~ •N i T.~
~ ~ O ~ O ~.U
0 .t3, v~ O F. ,¢.~ N ~,L
C3
N
~ .
p N Cl ~ ~ X +'
X
~
~ ~. 0
C U
~ ~ v O ~., ~ ~ N 'O rn
~ v, ~ a~ y V ~ ~
O
a~
O ~ a3 •B Li] ~ Y O ~ O ~
U
~.
~
v,
E c ~ °_' o o
o, ° a~ G o c c
ca
i +,°-_ `~ ,~ ~ ~ ~ `~' o
a0i a
~"~ U ~ ccS ~ ~ U L cd s..., ~ . C Y O ~ ''' bD s'" 'B Q : ~ N ~ C ~,,' •B.' -p • ~ c~~
•C N
•
n
O '~
. ""~
~
N
O N
>
RY .
~ .Y
'
~
Q)
cC -' ~
~ y ~ ~ •
i~ C
' N ~
O ~ ._~ ~p
. aN. (\j. ~ .N 'O
4
°
.w
R
te ~
.~
~ v~
~
' B
~ +~,,,. N N
.
6
~° ~
E "
U L1. M N C y ~
~
r.~ ° o ~
r,
~° Z
oA =
~~ r
..
o w
a
~ c~' Y
.= °
o c -
~ ~
~ Y c
o p- ~' o ~ `~ ~
c ~ r
dn
> >, o
a. .o E M ~ > ~v
N ~ •
by ~ ~ c 'U ~n O ~ =_ ~ ~. ¢ ~ ~n •
c
~ ~ ..~, .... ~[ `n ~ N ccf N.
~ ~ L1 ..a N V
]
; U L ~
'Y ~
~ 'C ~ N C cC CC
p ' L 'C7 N
.C.. ~ E' _
.--.
Q O ~ N °
U
~ U ~ >; •'. cd ~ ~ 1
.-. . ~
~ ~ OU t; 4. t~ s.. ~ N.
_
.
•?' N •~
°
' o
~ Q Y ocn
~
,_-
~
~
''
,~
~~ ~
`
o ~ ~
~
N
•E ' ~ `o o ~ °' c ~I
o
q
~ -
o
F
-'
c
.
O ~•-~ v ~ .C
O 'LS-' O ~ v, ~ ~ O a> aq O `" O • ~ t
_ O j Y ai 'r7 bA v
a>
v~ U ~ O
v
~ D.. F-' v~ U c~: ~ ~ s0. 'O ~ ~ U .'~-+ i ,
~ .
a>'+ .~ ~. ~-+ .-~ •~ N ~ U O
bD V :6 .~ .~ ~ N N ~ '~ N
0 0 O O ~ .C. N, ~ v~ [C ~ bA ~ ~ ~ 'O N
F- '~ =. a0i U CL ..a O G. bA . C ~
~~
o
a~ o
Y
~ ~
~~
~ o
N N
C_ ~
rn
m
E.
~.
~ o
0
N N
~ i
O N
C
+~• ~
U ~
r~
~~~
~-. z z
U ~,
~' Q a
~~C9
d,~.Z
YOU O
~ W
d ~ Z
z. j O
O
~~O
z W H
= Z. Q
~_~ C7
>Q W ~
Q ~
~ ~ ~
Q H Q
W `~ X
Z
W
a
n.
Q
a
-,~ U C
~; °~ w a,
~
~ ` o
O "
..+
y C
~-+
p
'~ U
Q ~
~ ~
an
on ~
c ~ c ~
o c
o
'L i, ~
V a~ Y U
y C ~Q
bA
C y L .
O ~ ~ pOg p ~
L
(i ~
O U I
e
v.. o ~
O
u
C Q ~
L U
'~ R Q
E"' C ~
r
u ~
C
~ ~.
,
^
R
.
• ~
a
L G.
O
U ~_'
U
_
~+. ~ ~
a> O `~
N ~ ~
O ~'
U
a3 O
G
T
U +. ~
~ v,
N
. ^
~ ' '
C N O cd C N U N ~. O R C N
D
N ^ t. 'B.
C .a3 '.~ O, C s..
~O O N ~
~ O
~ ~ 'd
'C3 ~
`. O
C U O _ U cC G
~ O
''' C O ~ U
0
U G N 'C. p p ,~ „ L .a ~ O ,., ~ •
s
C
O G
c
~ ~
~ . U O ~n V ~
^ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ C
.
:a 'D C t
~. L ~ U ~ ~ y c
YC O. O U Y O "cC~ ~ c~ N
'a ~
~ : ,
++ ~.~ U
, pp ~ ~i- CJ, ~ Z N N `~ s
~ O
;L O rn ~ ~ O :~ U: -.
G
~~
~ ~ L ..bOA "> -~~ ~0 ,L. '~ N ~ j U 'B f3. ~~
V' ~ 0.
~
b4
O
U '~
O
^'
fir. _
4
t
`n
~
O
U O '~ .
_ '
U - c
,
~:.
!1 a~
O N
N ~.. O:_
¢ U O
iG . ~n
~.. pp .C 'n ~ C1 r.. . • ,~ ~D
T •°~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ °
' ~ ~ ~ ~ .o Y o 3 ° ~ ~ L ~ ~
~
bA ~ ~ N .~ ;N L ~ ~ ~. ~ ^~ y .^... ~ Y y~ Q ~ O ._ G N U O
~''~ ~ O O O C ~ ~
i
=~ U Q C '-' rn
" O
O G
G ~
i
~ O ~
~ ~
fl a
~
~
O
~
O
Y ~ v' N . ..a - v
i .
G
. c.
U
3
~ ~ o
w ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ '
°' n c '~ ~ ~' 3
•~
~
~ ~ ~
~ . a
i
~
~ '~
;~ ~
~ ~ ea
o~ ~ .ca U ,c
U
,
~ ~,
~~ U ~-
`~
a~
S .~ ~ c .~
H Y
3 0 0 0
. a~ o~
. ~
~. ~
o
a~ o
Y ~
~ ~
~ ~
~ o
N N
_C ~
0
m
3 p~
m ~
0
N N
a
o m
c
w 3
U
y Co
z z
wog
~, Q' d
~ ~'~
a,gz
Iwo
~ Z
Z, j. O
0~~.
~' ~ O
ZW~
Z Q
~ ~''-a ~
>¢' w ~
Q
Q F- ~
Q
w~X
Z
W
a
a
~ ~
U
p GA
~, ~
o a.o
~~ •
o
U .
n:. .
Q U ~
'v s
~
C
C CQ C O O
U +.+
y 'C Y
~
C ~ ~ OA
~. v~
~ A ~ O
L
~. ~ U
Q
c
w. o
o ~, ~
°
.
Q °
U
~
_
• ~
O
~ R
[~ ~ C. ~
O
rte.
U ~
4.>' R _
~
•~ •a N
o.
~ o °
U ~'
U
(Cf Q. 4--. N ~ y ~ }~-, ~
.Q ,~ ~. Q ~ bf1 O ~ O ~ O > O •O O Y ~~
'
C=Q ~ .O ~ N ~ C ~ GI N ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~
~ y ~
bA c~
~• N
•~
s
~o
o ~ •V •°va~~
~~N~
°
s
~ ~ N a •~ Y '~ E
.,
t ~ v ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ °'
~ c
¢
O
Y i •
a
"
~
OJ O ~'"' ~-, : ~ L O 5-. N
a
~ c~ 'D N 3.: N. cd GJ N. •
~ O
~ b1J ~ d
at f1. ~ •
^ O Z ~ U
O Z >
Vi .C .
.
a's.. C:...~ ^~ b~A ~ U ~
O
'C7
-~ ~ c~ ~O
.b O.
O a
~
~
~
i
O
vi ~ C
~'
„Y
~ U N cd O ~`1
s... cC l~ C
O C cC O~ ~
Y ° ~, v c ~ -a a~ N ~ ~ ~ ~. E- ~
a ~ o ~
Y
L G O ~ ~ ,cd ~• ~ ~. C ~
~ y ~,
~ ~ L ~ cd c~
O •
,
N
R C n
G
V ~ C O .~ ~ U O ~ s
V 'C3
~
~:
C
O O . ¢ .
.. Y
._ ~
`Z ~ o
~ Gam
Q G ® ® Z U 'p '_
Q Q F-' ~Li "a ~
0
40"'
r .
. a
i
.
~~
o
a~ o
Y
~~
~~
~o
N N
C O
(0
~ p)
~ O
O
N N
a ,
o m
c
~_ ~
U ~
y~