Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Resolution 2015-03 04/14/2015RESOLUTION NO. 2015-03 CITY OF PETALUMA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR THE LAGUNITAS CAMPUS MODIFICATIONS PROJECT LOCATED AT 1240, 1250, 1280, & 1340 NORTH MCDOWELL BOULEVARD FILE NO. PLSR-14-0025 WHEREAS, Lagunitas Brewing Company submitted an application for Site Plan and Architectural Review for modifications including a tank farm addition, water polishing facility, new beer garden entry, and construction of parking and a trunk -around at vacant lands located the Lagunitas campus and specifically at 1240, 1250, 1280, and 1340 North McDowell Boulevard (APNs 007-582-009, -008, and 137- 011-019 and -020); and WHEREAS, the Project is subject to the Petaluma General Plan 2025, adopted by the City on May 19, 2008; and WHEREAS, in evaluating certain potential environmental effects of the Project, including but not limited to effects of climate change, water supply, and traffic, the City relied on the program EIR for the City of Petaluma General Plan 2025, certified on April 7, 2008 (General Plan EIR) with the adoption of Resolution No. 2008-058 N.C.S., which is incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS, the General Plan EIR identified potentially significant environmental impacts and related mitigation measures and the City also adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant impacts that could not be avoided; and WHEREAS, the City prepared an Initial Study for the proposed Project consistent with CEQA Guidelines sections 15162 and 15163 and determined that a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was required in order to analyze the potential for new or additional significant environmental impacts of the Project beyond those identified in the General Plan EIR, and the MND and its supporting Initial Study and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program are attached as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS, on or before March 25, 2015, the City's Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration based on the Initial Study, providing for a 20 -day public comment period commencing March 25, 2015 and ending April 14, 2015 and Notices of Public Hearing for the Project to be held on April 14, 2015 before the City of Petaluma Planning Commission, were published and mailed to all residents and property owners within 500 feet of the Project as well as all persons having requested special notice of said proceedings; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on April 14, 2015, at which time all interested parties had the opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the Project, the MND, the supporting Initial Study, the staff report dated April 14, 2015 analyzing the MND and the Project, and received and considered all written and oral public comments on environmental effects of the Project which were submitted up to and at the time of the public hearings; and Planning Commission Resolution No. 2015-03 Page 1 WHEREAS, pursuant to the analysis in the Initial Study/MND, the Project does not make a considerable contribution to the significant and unavoidable cumulative traffic and/or noise impacts identified in the General Plan 2025 EIR because of its small size; and WHEREAS, pursuant to further analysis in the Initial Study/MND, including evaluation using the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) recently adopted CEQA Guidelines`and 2010 Clean Air Plan, the Project does not make a considerable contribution to a significant cumulative air quality or greenhouse gas emission impacts found to be significant and unavoidable in the General Plan 2025 EIR, because of the Project's small size and lack of significant stationary sources of emissions; and WHEREAS, the MND reflects the City's independent judgment and analysis of the potential for environmental impacts from the Project; and WHEREAS, the MND including its supporting Initial Study, and related project and environmental documents, including the General Plan 2025 EIR and all documents incorporated herein by reference, are available for review in the City Planning Division at Petaluma City Hall, during normal business hours and the custodian of the documents and other materials which constitute the record of proceedings for the proposed project, File No. PLSR-14-0025, is the City of Petaluma Planning Division, 11 English St. Petaluma, CA 94952; and WHEREAS, while the Initial Study for the Project identified potentially significant impacts, all significant impacts are adequately mitigated to a less than significant level and therefore the project would not result in any significant impacts to the environment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT: 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference. 2. Based on its review of the entire record herein, including the MND, its Initial Study, all supporting, referenced and incorporated documents and all comments received, the Planning Commission hereby, finds that there is no substantial evidence that the Project as mitigated will have a significant effect on the environment, that the MND reflects the City's independent judgment and analysis, and that the MND, Initial Study and supporting documents provide an adequate description of the impacts of the Project and comply with CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines and the City of Petaluma Environmental Guidelines. ADOPTED this 14th day of April, 2015, by the following vote: Commission Member Aye No Absent Abstain Vice Chair Benedetti-Petnic X Gomez X Chair Lin X Marzo X Councilmember Barrett X Pierre I X Wolpert X Planning Commission Resolution No. 2015-03 Page 2 ATTEST: Heat ,er Hines, Corrnission Secretary J elyn Lint' Chair/ APPROVED AS TO FORM: ° -. An-rea Vis)eshwara, Assistant City Attorney Planning Commission Resolution No. 2015-03 Page 3 L U� City of Petaluma, California I Exhibit A Community Development Department $ a Planning Division 11 English Street, Petaluma, CA 94952 Project Name: LAGUNITAS BREWING COMPANY EXPANSION File Number: PLSR-14-0025 Address/Location: 1240, 1250, 1280 and 1340 North McDowell Boulevard Petaluma, CA 94952 APNs: 007-582-009, -008, and 137-011-019 and -020, MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) has been prepared in conformance with Section 21081.6 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and Section 15097 of the CEQA Guidelines. This document has been developed to ensure implementation of mitigation measures and proper and adequate monitoring/reporting of such implementation. This MMRP shall be adopted in conjunction with project approval, which relies upon a Mitigated Negative Declaration. It is the intent of this MMRP to: (1) document implementation of required mitigation; (2) identify monitoring/reporting responsibility, be it the lead agency (City of Petaluma), other agency (responsible or trustee agency), or a private entity (applicant, contractor, or project manager); (3) establish the frequency and duration of monitoring/reporting; (4) provide a record of the monitoring/reporting; and (5) ensure compliance. The City of Petaluma's Planning Commission has adopted those mitigation measures within its responsibility to implement as binding conditions of approval. The following table lists each of the mitigation measures adopted by the City in connection with project approval, the implementation action, timeframe to which the measure applies, the monitoring/reporting responsibility, reporting requirements, and the status of compliance with the mitigation measure. Implementation The responsibilities of implementation include review and approval by City staff including the engineering, planning, and building divisions. Responsibilities include the following: 1. The applicant shall obtain all required surveys and studies and provide a copy to the City prior to issuance of grading permits or approvals of improvements plans. 2. The applicant shall incorporate all applicable code provisions and required mitigation measures and conditions into the design and improvements plans and specifications for the project. The applicant shall notify all employees, contractors, subcontractor, and agents involved in the project implementation of mitigation measures and conditions applicable to the project and shall ensure compliance with such measures and conditions. 4. The applicant shall provide for the cost of monitoring of any condition or mitigation measure that involves on-going operations on the site or long-range improvements. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2015-03 Page 4 The applicant shall designate a project manager with authority to implement all mitigation measures and conditions of approval and provide name, address, and phone numbers to the City prior to issuance of any grading permits and signed by the contractor responsible for construction. 6. Mitigation measures required during construction shall be listed as conditions on the building or grading permits and signed by the contractor responsible for construction. 7. All mitigation measures shall be incorporated as conditions of project approval. 8. If deemed appropriate by the City, the applicant shall arrange a pre -construction conference with the construction contractor, City staff and responsible agencies to review the mitigation measures and conditions of approval prior to the issuance of grading and building permits. Monitoring and Reporting The responsibilities of monitoring and reporting include the engineering, planning, and building divisions, as well as the fire department. Responsibilities include the following: The Building, Planning, and Engineering Divisions and Fire Department shall review the improvement and construction plans for conformance with the approved project description and all applicable codes, conditions, mitigation measures, and permit requirements prior to approval of a site design review, improvement plans, grading plans, or building permits. 2. The Planning Division shall ensure that the applicant has obtained applicable required permits from all responsible agencies and that the plans and specifications conform to the permit requirements prior to the issuance of grading or building permits. Prior to acceptance of improvements or issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all improvements shall be subject to inspection by City staff for compliance with the project description, permit conditions, and approved development or improvement plans. 4. City inspectors shall ensure that construction activities occur in a manner that is consistent with the approved plans and conditions of approval. MMRP Checklist The following table lists each of the mitigation measures adopted by the City in connection with project approval, the timeframe to which the measure applies, the person/agency/permit responsible for implementing the measure, and the status of compliance with the mitigation measure. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2015-03 Page 5 N Y *cd U p U p o n Zg U `n n � U O � bA y U Y Y w ';3 bli O N Cly A W p, o � � � O Y � U N Y *cd U p U p o n Zg U `n n � U O � bA y U Y Y w ';3 bli O N Cly A W p, o � � � O U � a'ppoi d d y U U bAi W O O .� 04) O acd N U v.o N Y *cd U p U p o n Zg U `n n � U O � bA y U Y Y w ';3 bli O N Cly A W p, o � U � a'ppoi d d N Y *cd U p U p o n Zg U `n n � U O � bA y U Y Y w ';3 bli O N Cly A W p, o � 0 a In P, 40 a In a: oA �" bA LY1 � � ,q y �,.• d ���!! t�3 U id O . nA us o v � L}. o1131 u to > aA v ai U -d �•�o �.�U� Cd Cd a� o l 3 y zs vi O 7 0 i p d p o P. u u u> d r+ bD v a'p sya o e,ani 0 ,0 N ami a3i � o W o b —,do CA 'n o v ." � k3 a� cd o a o 00 ¢ v A y Ao p+ U o O bA a3 o u 0 3 �A o .o ,o o cruc3 0 15 4 a w tD Q'tDo . oA ct bA c4 '-` o ' i.+ '�'S C� N N U c7 0 o Jo b cd O p. U p Q U O� 0 CL Q � H a� U � d a a: oA �" bA LY1 � � ,q y �,.• d ���!! t�3 U id O . nA us o v � L}. o1131 u to > aA v ai U -d �•�o �.�U� Cd Cd a� o l 3 y zs vi O 7 0 i p d p o P. u u u> d r+ bD v a'p sya o e,ani 0 ,0 N ami a3i � o W o b —,do CA 'n o v ." � k3 a� cd o a o 00 ¢ v A y Ao p+ U o O bA a3 o u 0 3 �A o .o ,o o cruc3 0 15 4 a w tD Q'tDo . oA ct bA c4 '-` o ' i.+ '�'S C� N N U c7 0 o Jo b cd O p. U p Q U O� 0 CL 0 0 � O U O O � 40 o o o U nA nA U Y Y d p cn O rya, O �01 con U N c � •Y' ^�'' R1 CA N O U � r -+ aA 0 �r p a p � 0 0 � O o O O � �„•� U � � y o U nA nA nA 3 0 � O O O � O d p cn O rya, O Nu 0 rH-'+ o A tA U a w 0 v o 17. pov �U'�•' o 10 V O bA a> awo ��0 oP'v °� �' � ' v � � O yam,, � � •"d G ;�, � ¢, w.� r*--, So pA qpj0 d O O O U cd ¢ cO0 -14 " ✓ N U v� '00 Ay '� vUi U p }• 0 �.00 U U O vi N N +n05,Q ¢, y OC* � p' U N .� O .a U N tt5 N wow CY,0O N y' n 6 N U U p QA O c3 G+ tr U + O O 2f O N CL u� OU U N p Lr+ O cYC c}}a.y. O U +-�.�?, U