HomeMy WebLinkAboutPCDC Minutes 08/11/1975CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
OF THE
CITY OF PETALUMA
Minutes of Adjourned Meeting
August 11, 1975
The meeting was called to order at the hour of 4:05 p.m. in
the Council Chambers of the Petaluma City Hall- Post and
English Streets,. Petaluma, California, by Chairman Helen
Putnam,-
Present:
utnam,
Present; Commissioners Brunner, Cavanagh, *Harberson, **Hilligoss,
Mattei,..and Chairman Putnam.
Absent: Commissioner Perry.
-Commissioner Harberson arrived at 4:10 p.m.
**Commissioner Hilligoss"arrived at 4:07 p.m.
APPROVAL OF The minutes of,June.9, 1975, were approved as recorded. The
MINUTES minutes of ,July 7, 1975,- were corrected to include that
Commissioners.Hilligoss and, Perry had been sworn prior to
the meeting of .July_7,'1975, as members of the Petaluma
Redevelopment Agency.
PETALUMA AREA A letter directed to;` the Executive Director of the Redevelopment
CHAMBER OF Agency, Robert H. Meyer, dated August 4, 1975, by Max A.
COMMERCE Mickelsen, President of -the Petaluma Area Chamber of Commerce,
and James B. Williams, President of Petaluma Downtown Association,
was read by the Recording Secretary and ordered filed. The
letter requested an informal joint meeting of the Redevelopment Agency, the
Executive Committee of the Chamber of Commerce, and the officers of the Downtown
Association, as well as members of the press to participate in a no --host
luncheon or dinner meeting at a mutually agreeable time and place; however,
the members of the Agency felt any such meeting-could'be held within the
framework of a regular meeting.of the Redevelopment Agency. The Executive
Director was to so.advise the Petaluma'Area Chamber.of.Commerce and arrange
for an agenda date for the meeting.
DESIGNATION OF PRA Resolution #7 designating a survey area was introduced
SURVEY AREA by Commissioner Mattel, seconded by Commissioner Harberson „
PRA RES X67 and approved by 6 affirmative votes, 1 absentee.
The General.Counsel, Matthew Hudson, advised the members of
the Agency they -had the power under the law to designate a survey area. He
advised the Commissioners the Planning Commission had met and adopted a resolu-
tion identifying the area on the City's map as'an appropriate study area.
Because of a power failure, the Deputy Director Frank Gray was unable to
outline the area by means of a viewfoil; however, each member of the Agency
had a copy of the map, which designatedthe proposed study area and marked as
Exhibit "A" to PRA Resolution #7.'The``primary areas proposed for study include
Redevelopment_Agenr�rwMeet- ng,--.-%A.ugust 11, 1975
DESIGNATION OF commercial and industrial areas, ratherthan residential
SURVEY AREA areas. Commissioner Hilligoss stated the Planning Commission
PRA RES #7 made this determination because the Housing -Authority would,
(continued) when -established, be concerned-w3th-redevelepment of residential
areas. She did state, however, there`=are some residential
areas included in the study --those being -on Wilson Street
and Petaluma Boulevard North. Mr. Gray then outlined:the,confines of the
study area and the various zoning designations within the area.
Planning.Commission Resolution #12-75 recommending -a survey area submitted and
filed by the Deputy Director.
Commissioner Mattei questioned why the study:area di.d.not.include the extension
up to Fair Street as had been previously discussed.. He also questioned whether
or not Bassett Street should not be included in the study area. Mr. Gray
responded by stating the area was purposely kept more or less compact and
concentrated primarily on the core area. He further stated the entire area as
depicted on Exhibit "A" would not be studied at one time; however, a small
portion of the area would be -selected for review, concentrating on a certain
project area.and. moving_along.in a very cautionary manner. -
Some question was raised why the designation_was-confined.�-strictly to the
industrial and commercial phase of:redevelopment:aud_no..provisions made for
residential redevelopment or revitalization. Planning�Director:-Dennis $oehlje
then stated the Planning:Commission-was.given.direction-to eliminate residential
areas. He advised the Agency there.could be other -means for.revitalizing or
redevelopment of blighted residential areas by use of Code enforcement.
The Executive Director, Robert Meyer, then asked "If:the time came when the
Agency was able to freeze the taxes -in -the redevelopment -area, would such a
tax freeze include the entire area as depicted on Exhibit.- "A! -!t of= the --resolution?"
Mr. Gray responded that only the -project area selected:would,be eligible for
the tax freeze.
Some discussion was -then -held regarding expandi_ng_the survey ---area to include
more properties -near -the civic center and also extending4-up-,Western Avenue,
possibly as far as Fair Street: Chairman._.Piifinam ..r_emarked-the::,2,-.anni.ng Commission
had made their recommendation that -the Redevelopment_Ageney::adapt the proposed
survey area designation.and-then questioned Deputy Director:_Frank Gray whether
or not the resolution, if adopted by-the.Redevelopment:Agency,.__could be amended?
Mr. Gray advised the Agency the survey,designation.could be amended.by resolution
if referred to the -Planning Commission for comment.
The criteria for selecting the project area within the_, des guated survey area
was discussed—Mr. Gray indicated-the.Planning Commiss on'.-s__first priority
would probably -be the.:.core.area; however,.if residents or land owners in a
certain area -indicated to the Agency they would like to be included in a
project area, the Redevelopment Agency would have to take�the matter under
consideration. The Agency, however,.would have -the prer.ogative_of assigning
priorities to any projects.
Some comment was -made regarding -the language -contained -in P.RA.Resolution #7
and -the General-Coun.sel,:Matthew Hudson, advised.the.Rerlevelopment Agency the
Redevelopment Agency Meeting, ----August 11, 1975
DESIGNATION .OF. language comes-di-rectly:from. the statute. _zMr,...Hudson further
SURVEY AREA indicated. it would probab.ly be an. easier_-taskc .: f.ox. the Redevelop -
PRA RES #7 men.t Ag,euc.y.. to: expand_. this: designated: survey_ area than to
(continued) reduce the scope -of -the area: Deputy:Director Frank Gray
explained_.to..the..Redevelopment Agency .the term P9blighted
area" did not necessarily mean ar-eas-which showed gross
deterioration. It could refer to illogical lotting or it could -refer to areas
which indicated some economic deterioration.
Upon conclusion of the discussion, the above resolution was adopted.
JOINT MEETING-- Chairman . Putnam. asked that- a- meeting b.e..s.cheduled at a
REDEVELOPMENT. mutually -agreeable time.forea.joint°meeting.of_the.Redevelopment
AGENCY/PLANNING Agency and the Planning Commission.. -:-Possibly at the Agency's
COMMISSION next regular meet_ ;ng_date.
OLD MILL Mr. Skip:S.ommer,..the developer_for.the-project proposed
PROJECT adjacent to the Petaluma_R yer-_at_.`°B`.';.Street, spoke to the
Redevelopment Agency.advsing the -'members -he expected to
make a full pres-ent4t.ion_ to : the- Planning; Commission September 16,
1975, on the. .pxoj.ect._lie proposes in the core area.
ADJOURNMENT There being -no -further business to come_ bef ore�..the Redevelopment
Agency, the meeting was adjourned at 5:07 p.m.
Attest:
�Recor`diSecretary
-3-
Chairman