HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 2016-046 N.C.S. 04/04/2016Resolution No. 2016 -046 N.C.S.
of the City of Petaluma, California
ACCEPTING THE FISCAL YEAR 2015
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE REPORT
PURSUANT TO AB -1600
WHEREAS, the City of Petaluma imposes fees to mitigate the impacts of development,
pursuant to Government Code § §66000 et seq.; and,
WHEREAS, fees collected are deposited into a separate fund account for each type of
development impact fee; and,
WHEREAS, a description of each fee, its amount, and various information required by
Government Code section 66006(b)(1) to be reported on an annual basis is set forth in the
Development Impact Fee Report — Fiscal Year 2014 -2015 attached hereto as Attachment 1 and
incorporated herein by reference ( "the Report"), as required by Government Code §66006(b)(1);
and,
WHEREAS, the Report was made available to the public on the City's website on March
15, 2016; and,
WHEREAS, copies of the Report were mailed on March 15, 2016 to all persons having
requested notice of City actions relating to fees; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the Report.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that:
1. The recitals stated herein are true and correct and adopted as findings of the City
Council.
2. The City Council has received and reviewed and hereby accepts the Development
Impact Fee Report — Fiscal Year 2014 -2015 attached hereto as Attachment 2 and
incorporated herein by reference ( "the Report ").
Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City.
REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the Approved as I
Council of the City of Petaluma at a Regular meeting on the 41h day of April, 2016, frm: ;
by the following vote:
City Attorney
AYES: Albertson, Barrett, Mayor Glass, Healy, Kearney, Vice Mayor King, Miller
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None}
ATTEST: 'td�
City Clerk Mayor
Resolution No. 2016 -046 N.C.S. Page I
fkr;.,e
ai
��4;
-1855$
9
Attachment 1
to Resolution 2016 -046 N.C.S
CITY OF PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA
ANNUAL DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE REPORT
FISCAL YEAR 2014 -15
Resolution No. 2016 -046 N.C.S. Page 2
City of Petaluma
Annual Development Impact Fee Report
Fiscal Year 2014 -15
Background
The Mitigation Fee Act, Government Code § §66000 et seq., (the "Act ") governs the establishment and
administration of development impact fees paid by new development projects for public facilities needed
to serve new development. Fees must be separately accounted for and used for the specific purpose for
which the fee was imposed. The City's adopted development impact fees are listed in the attached
exhibits. Expenditures are authorized through the annual Capital and Operating Budgets and the City's
Capital Improvement Program. The annual adopted City Budget is on file with the City Clerk.
Annual Development Fee Reporting
The Act requires that the City prepare an annual review of all development impact fees as defined in the
Act and make a public report on the fees available to the public after the end of each fiscal year.
Government Code §66006(b)(2) requires the report to be placed on an agenda for review at a public
meeting not less than 15 days after the report is made available to the public. The Fiscal Year 2014 -2015
report was made available to the public on the City of Petaluma website on March 15, 2016; a copy of the
report also was mailed to all persons who had requested mailed notice relating to city fees on March 15,
2016.
Excluded from this report are developer fees which are not subject to the reporting requirements of the
Act. For example, fees collected pursuant to the City's zoning powers, rather than pursuant to the Act, are
in -lieu housing fees, the commercial linkage fee which is the non - residential equivalent of an in -lieu
housing fee, public art in -lieu fees and one fee related to the Central Petaluma Specific Plan area. Water
capacity fees and wastewater capacity fees are not development impact fees as defined in Sections 66006
and 66001 of the Act. The Quimby Act parkland acquisition fee for residential subdivisions is imposed
pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act (Gov't. Code §66477), and is also not included in the Section 66001
reporting requirement.
The Storm Drainage Fee was last updated in 1986, prior to the January 1, 1989 effective date of A131600,
but is nevertheless included in this report and findings for informational purposes.
The city is also required to adopt by resolution certain findings for any fund accounts which contain
unexpended funds as of the fifth fiscal year following the first deposit into those funds and every five
years thereafter. (Gov't. Code §66001(d).) In FY 14 -15, no impact fee funds fall into this category and
therefore no resolution has been adopted related to unexpended funds.
The report is organized as follows:
Exhibit A: A brief description of the purposes of each development impact fee and its authorizing
legislation (Gov't. Code §66006(b)(1)(A).)
Exhibit B: Summary of the July 1, 2014 beginning balance, annual fee revenue collected, interest earned,
returned unused funds from projects and loan repayments, identification of public improvements on
which fees were expended and the ending balance as of June 30, 2015 for each fee (Gov't. Code
§66006(b)(1)(C) -(E).) Excess funds from capital project funds were returned to the originating revenue
Resolution No. 2016 -046 N.C.S. Page 3
funds. The annual expenditures on each specific public improvement are listed, including the total
percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with development impact fees. In
addition to public improvement project costs, the City incurs costs to administer each mitigation fee
program and to prepare the annual reports and the five -year compliance analysis also required by the Act.
As shown in the mitigation fee cost studies (or "nexus studies ") which support the various impact fees, the
City charges administrative and compliance costs at 2% of the program cost for each fee as a program
expense. The actual dollar cost for these expenditures is listed for each fee. No individual development
impact fee fund has collected sufficient funds to construct all improvements covered by that fund as
described in the nexus studies (Gov't. Code §66006(b)(1)(F).)
Exhibit C: Identifies the amount of each development impact fee, including the modifications which
were adopted July 7, 2014, when the City amended provisions of the Traffic Development Impact Fee.
Exhibit D: Identifies interfund loans, transfers, refunds or reallocation of funds in lieu of refunds in
Fiscal Year 2014 -2015 (Gov't. Code §66006(b)(1)(G) -(H)).
Resolution No. 2016 -046 N.C.S. Page 4
Exhibit A
City of Petaluma
Development Impact Fee Summary
Fee #
Impact Fee Name
Fee Authority
Brief Description of the Type of Fee
1
^>
Aquatic Center Facilities
Reso. 2008 -086
The Aquatic Center Facilities Impact Fee is to finance the
Impact Fee
N.C.S., May 19, 2008
portion of construction of an aquatic complex with a 50
meter lap pool and a 4,500 square foot recreation pool that
is related to the project's services to new development.
2
(A)
Community Center
Reso. 2008 -088,
The Community Center Facilities Impact Fee is to finance
Facilities Impact Fee
N.C.S., May 19, 2008
the expansion of community center facilities, including
furniture and fixtures, to equip new community center
facilities space required to reduce the impact of future
development.
3
(A)
Fire Suppression
Reso. 2008 -088
The Fire Suppression Facilities Impact Fee is to finance
Facilities Impact Fee
N.C.S., May 19, 2008
specific fire protection and emergency services facilities
to reduce impacts caused by future development.
4
(A)
Library Facilities Impact
Reso. 2008 -090
The Library Facilities Impact fee is to provide funding for
Fee
N.C.S., May 19, 2008
additional library facilities, furniture, fixtures and
collection materials to reduce the impacts caused by future
development.
5
Parkland Acquisition
Reso. 2014 -038
The Parkland Acquisition Fee is imposed on development
Fee
N.C.S., March 3,
projects that are not subject to the Quimby Act. It funds
2014; Reso. 2012-
acquisition of and payment for parkland necessary to
124 N.C.S., August
maintain the standard established in the city's General
27, 2012; Reso.
Plan, based on a ratio of parkland acreage to population,
2008 -092 N.C.S.,
including employees of new commercial development, as
May 19, 2008
new residents and employees are added by new
development.
6
Parkland Development
Reso. 2014 -037
The Parkland Development Fee funds public facilities
Impact Fee
N.C.S., March 3,
which improve neighborhood and community parklands as
2014; Reso. 2012-
needed to serve new development.
122 N.C.S., August
27, 2012; Reso.
2008 -093 N.C.S.,
May 19, 2008
7
Open Space Acquisition
Reso, 2014 -039
The Open Space Acquisition Fee funds acquisition of and
Impact Fee
N.C.S., March 3,
payment for open space necessary to maintain the city's
2014; Reso. 2012-
standard established in its General Plan based on a ratio of
123 N.C.S., August
open space acreage to population, including employees of
27, 2012; Reso.
new commercial development, as new residents and
2008 -091 N.C.S.,
employees are added by new development.
May 19, 2008
Resolution No. 2016 -046 N.C.S. Page 5
8
(A)
Law Enforcement
Reso. 2008 -089
The Law Enforcement Facility Fee funds the portion of
Facilities Impact Fee
N.C.S., May 19, 2008
construction of new law enforcement facilities, including a
new police station and two communications towers, and
acquisition of police vehicles and equipment, that is
related to the need to serve new development.
9
(A)
Public Facilities Impact
Reso. 2008 -094
The Public Facilities Impact Fee funds a proportionate
Fee
N.C.S., May 19, 2008
share of City Hall renovation or relocation, corporation
yard construction and VOIP and Wi -Fi communications
systems. It also funds additional computer technology and
city vehicles to serve the added population and employees
brought to the city by new development.
10
(A)
City Facilities
Reso. 2014 -036
The City Facilities Development Impact Fee funds design,
Development Impact
N.C.S., March 3,
engineering, right -of -way and reasonable costs of outside
Fee
2014; Reso. 2012-
consultant studies related thereto, reimburse the City for
121 N.C.S., August
the Facilities constructed by the City with funds from
27, 2012
other sources including funds from other public entities,
reimburse developers who have designed and constructed
any of the facilities with prior City approval and have
entered into an agreement and pay for and /or reimburse
costs of program development and ongoing administration
and maintenance for the Fee program, including, but not
limited to, the cost of studies, legal costs, and other costs
of updating the Fee.
1 I
Storm Drainage Impact
Ord. 1530 N.C.S.,
The Storm Drainage Impact Fee funds the construction of
Fee
eff. Sept. 20, 1982;
storm drainage improvements needed to control increases
Ord. 1653 N.C.S.,
in run -off created by new development projects. The
eff. June 2, 1986
Stonn Drainage Impact Fee was adopted and last updated
(Petaluma Municipal
before the enactment and effective date of AB 1600, but is
Code Chapter 17.30);
included in this report for informational purposes.
Reso. 9751 N.C.S.,
June 2, 1986
12
Traffic Development
Reso 2014 -112
The Traffic Development Impact Fee funds construction
Impact Fee
N.C.S., July 7, 2014
and implementation of improvements to key elements of
Reso. 2014 -040
the citywide transportation system sufficient to
N.C.S., March 3,
accommodate future traffic demand generated by new
2014; Reso. 2012-
development.
125 N.C.S., August
27, 2012; Reso.
2008 -095 N.C.S.,
May 19, 2008
(A) The City Facilities Impact Fee consolidated the following six previous development impact fees into a single fee: Aquatic
Center Facilities Impact Fee, Community Center Facilities Impact Fee, Fire Suppression Facilities Impact Fee, Law
Enforcement Facilities Impact Fee, Library Facilities Impact Fee, and the Public Facilities Impact Fee.
Resolution No. 2016 -046 N.C,S. Page 6
Development Impact Fee Report
Fiscal Year 2014 -15
Fund ( I Fund Title / Project Title
2110 1 (A) (Aquatic Center Facilities Impact Fees
City administrative costs
� II
2120 I (A) Community Facilities Impact Fees
1100100108 Comm facilities Misc projects
l (.001000001 GG CIP G &A Sal/Ben
i (.00100205 Corp Yard Bldg Roof
j .00200103 Library Renovation
1 .00200203 Bassett St Renovation
(City administrative costs
2121 (A) Community Center Facilities - 08
IjCity administrative costs
2125 I cA, (Fire Suppression Facilities Impact Fees
.00300405 Expansion of Fire Station 42 & #3
City administrative costs
I
2135 I (A) ( Library Facility Impact Fees
1 (City administrative costs
2140 I IParlcland Acq and Dev Impact Fees
1 Izc0400001 Parks CIP G &A Sal/Ben
.00400100 Shollenberger Site
.00400204 Gatti/Leghorn Park
1 (.1400104 East Washington Park
(.00400206 Wiseman Park Improvments
I
2141 1 (Parkland Acquisition Impact Fees -08
1 1 City administrative costs
2142 I IParlcland Development Impact Fees -08
(.1400104 East Washington Park
1 City administrative costs
2143 ( Open Space Acquisition Impact Fees -08
City administrative costs
2145 (A) (Law E.foreern.t Facilities Impact Fees
1 1City administrative costs
2150 I cA> 1Public Facilities Impact Fees
i
1.00100104 Museum Roof
1 City administrative costs
2151 I (A) (Public Facilities Impact Fees -08
1 I City administrative costs
Exhibit B
Fund Balance
i Fee
I Interest
I Return Unused
1 Expenditures/1
Est %funded
I Ending Balance
7/1/2014
Revenue
I Revenue
IFunds /loan repymt
Transfers
1 by Impact Fees
1 6/30/2015
76,095.65
578.00
( 177.83
(
I 11.56
I
I 76,839.92
1
(
1 11.561
100.0%
I 1,163,869.92
I 1,116.00
261.52
12,000.00
93,757.32
I
1,083,490.12 1
I
I
I
29.50)
100.0°/ %I
53,050.501
100.0 %I
_I
{
I 1,184.00
( 100.0°/%!
I
38,797.00
_ 100.0%%
[
( 674.00(
100.0°/%(
I
1
)
1 22.321
100.0 %1
176,835.69
1,340.00
( 553.47
(
I 26.80
I
(
I
I 178,702.36 I
26.80
100.0°/%1
314,022.94
j 1,414.00
I 471.66
I
I 33,028.28)
) 282,880.32
I
I
I 33,000.00
( 100.0 %.(
28.281
100.0 %1
l
I 232,614.87
I
j 953.00
I
434.69
I
I
1
19.06
I
I
i
I 233,983.50 1
19.06
100.0 %1
1,515,925.071
34,605.031
(1,981.23)(
102,987.87)
i
1,651,536.74(
I I
1 (0.04
I
1 1,000.00
j 100.0 %1
I!
1
_
(
)
3,320.631
100.0 %1
_
I I
32,805.60
1 100.0%1
1
1
1,574,410.511
25.5°/%1
1
(
(
(
40,000.00
( 100.0%
I 624,432.16 1
174,367.00
2,048.12 1
1
4,179.44 1
I
796,667.84
1
1
4,179.441
100.0 %1
1,271,040.82)
634,169.20)
5,700.93(
;
1,316,046.041
1
594,864.911
1 I
I
(
1,303,362.66 (
21.1 %1
I
12,683.381
100.0 %1
4
I 76,731.85 1
45,969.78 1
256.39 I
1
919.40 1
122,038.62
919.40
100.0 %1
1 441,442.44 1
1,199.00 (
785.12
I_
23.98 1
1
443,402.58
23.98
100.0°/%1
171,445.16 (
1,086.00 1
379.37 I
3,999.61 I
2,379.96 1
F
174,530.18
1
2,358.24 1
100.0 %1
1
21.72 1
100.0 %1
I 161,572.61 1
1,114.00
!
505.57 I
1
22.28 I
( 163,169.90
_
(
22.28)
100.0 %1
Resolution No. 2016 -046 N.C.S.
Page 7
Fund (
( Fee Interest
Fund Title / Project Title
2152 {
{ 7/1/2014
City Facilities Development Impact Fees
{
6/30/2015
City administrative costs
2155 j
13,134.32
Storm Drainage Impact Fees
�c16301413 Capri Creek
{
1 13,134.32
c16301415 Surface Water Projects
3,300,193.77
.16301518 Old Corona Rd Water Quality
( 614.47
108,128.28
1116301307 Petaluma River Flood Control
1
3,410,504.27
1 City administrative costs
2156 1
Storm Drainage Impact Fees -08
1 8,000.001
100.0 %1
City administrative costs
2160 1
�Trafliic Impact Fees
j
2,000.001
1.00501304 Old Redwood Hwy Interchange
i
{ c00501204 Rainier Ave Cross town connector
c03200503 River Trail- Washington to Lakeville
100.0 %!
1c16101308 Lighted crosswalk Washington & Edi
1
I
1.16102015 Caulfield Grade Crossinglmproveme
1
1.5 %1
1 c65101402 Transit Signal Priority
1
(c65501503 Petahuna Transit Vehicle Location
{
480.97
City administrative costs
2161
1Traffic
I
Impact Fees -08
( 638.35
1
City administrative costs
Exhibit B
Fund Balance
( Fee Interest
Return Unused { Expenditures / Est% funded
Ending Balance
{ 7/1/2014
Revenue { Revenue
{Funds /loan repymt Transfers ( by Impact Fees
6/30/2015
{ 403,934.31
656,716.15 { 477.63
13,134.32
1,047,993.77 {
i
{
1 13,134.32
{ 100.0%
3,300,193.77
1 24,048.72
( 614.47
108,128.28
22,480.97
3,410,504.27
1
1 8,000.001
100.0 %1
2,000.001
13.6 %1
1,000.00
100.0 %!
1
1
I
11,000.00
1.5 %1
480.97
100.0 %1
203,181.66
6,454.24
( 638.35
1
1 129.08
210,145.17
1 129.08)
100.0 %1
1
3,061,890.19
577,181.72
6,422.28
L 3,816.19
( 633,463.41
1
3,015,846.97 1
1
I
100,000.00
1.1 %1
1
1
) 1
261,500.001
100.0 %I
1
35,000.00)
100.0 %I
h1 1
' _
41,000.001
20.1 %1
its )
(
67,000.00)
100.0 %!
_ 1
6,000.00)
3.4 %1
I_
111,000.001
46.1 %1
1
11,963.41 1
100.0 %
{ 9,776,128.92
1,884,128.03 1
33,408.51 j
1
37,682.56
1
11,655,982.90 1
{
{_
37,682.56 1
100.0%
(A) The City Facilities Impact Fee consolidated the following six previous development impact fees into a single
fee: Aquatic Center Facilities Impact Fee, Community Center Facilities hnpact Fee, Fire Suppression Facilities
Impact Fee, Law Enforcement Facilities Impact Fee, Library Facilities Impact Fee, and the Public Facilities
Impact Fee.
Resolution No. 2016 -046 N.C.S. Page 8
Exhibit C
FY 14/15 Development Impact Fee Schedule
FEE TYPE
LAND USE TYPE
FEE
UNIT OF MEASUREMENT
City Facilities
Development Impact
Fee (A)
Single Family Residential
$5,545
Unit
Multifamily Residential
$3,733
Unit
Accessory Dwelling
$1,902
Unit
Commercial
$1,050
1,000 sq ft of building space
Office
$1,004
1,000 sq ft of building space
Industrial
$639
1,000 sq ft of building space
Commercial
Development Housing
Linkage Fee Commercial $2.14 Square Foot
Retail $3.69 Square Foot
Industrial $2.21 Square Foot
Open Space Acquisition
Fee
Single Family Residential
$389
Unit
Multifamily Residential
$262
Unit
Accessory Dwelling
$134
Unit
Commercial
$74
1,000 sq ft of building space
Office
$71
1,000 sq ft of building space
Industrial
$45
1,000 sq ft of building space
Park Land Acquisition
Fee (Quimby and Non -
Quimby Act Projects)(B)
Single Family Residential
$1,660
Unit
Multifamily Residential
$1,123
Unit
Accessory Dwelling
$569
Unit
Commercial
$314
1,000 sq ft of building space
Office
$301
1,000 sq ft of building space
Industrial
$191
1,000 sq ft of building space
Park Land Development
Impact Fee Single Family Residential $5,353 Unit
Multifamily residential $3,605 Unit
Accessory Dwelling $1,836 Unit
Commercial $1,014 1,000 sq ft of building space
Office $970 1,000 sq ft of building space
Industrial $617 1,000 sq ft of building space
Resolution No. 2016 -046 N.C.S. Page 9
Exhibit C
FEE TYPE
LAND USE TYPE
FEE
UNIT OF MEASUREME NT
Traffic Development
Impact Fee
Single Family Residential
$18,493
Unit
Multifamily Residential
$11,284
Unit
Accessory Dwelling
$5,178
Unit
Senior Housing
$4,956
Unit
Office
$17,754
1,000 sq ft of building space
Hotel /Motel
$10,726
Room
Commercial /Shopping
$17,013
1,000 sq ft of building space
Industrial/Warehouse
$12,575
1,000 sq ft of building space
Education
$2,774
Student
Institution
$ 6,472
1,000 sq ft of building space
Gas /Service Station
$107,815
Fuel Position
Wastewater Capacity
Fee (C)
Single Family Residential
$7,542.29
Unit
Multifamily Residential
$4,993.11
Unit
Accessory Dwelling
$2,774.42
Unit
Non - Residential Customers
$ 16.00
$ 3,632.38
$ 4,165.13
Per gallon daily flow
Per daily pound of BOD
Per daily pound of TSS
Water Capacity Fee
(per meter size)
METER SIZE
FEE
3/4
$3,671.16
1" (residential)
$3,671.16
1" (non - residential)
$6,130.87
1 %2
$12,224.91
2"
$19,567.22
3"
$36,711.56
4"
$61,198.22
6"
$121,148.16
>6
Case by
Case basis
(a) The City Facilities Impact Fee consolidated the following six previous development impact fees into a single fee:
Aquatic Center Facilities Impact Fee, Community Center Facilities Impact Fee, Fire Suppression Facilities Impact
Fee, Law Enforcement Facilities Impact Fee, Library Facilities Impact Fee, and the Public Facilities Impact Fee.
(b) The Quimby Act applies only to fees and /or dedications imposed on certain subdivisions subject to the Subdivision
Map Act to fund land acquisition costs for park or recreational purposes.
(c) The wastewater capacity fee for non - residential users is based on the daily flow, biological oxygen demand and the
total suspended solids of the wastewater being discharged. Please contact the Department of Public Works & Utilities
at 707 - 778 -4546 for a quote.
Resolution No. 2016 -046 N.C.S. Page 10
Exhibit C
STORM DRAIN IMPACT FEE
Calculation of Fee
Runoff computation: The increase in runoff created by a given project is calculated for a 100 -year Amin, utilizing runoff
coefficients based upon the portion of vegetated area to impervious surfaces, and expressed in acre -feet. Runoff coefficients
are based upon the type of use, slope of the land, and percent of vegetation coverage.
Commercial/Industrial: Projects pay a fee of $30,000 per acre foot of additional runoff. The amount of incremental runoff
created is directly linked to the amount of landscaping provided. The maximum fee possible is $9,000 per acre of land. This
would apply to a project with 20% or less landscaping. A project with 25% landscaping can expect a fee of $6,750 per acre,
30% would pay $6,300 per acre, and so on.
Residential: Projects pay a fee of $15,000 per acre foot of additional runoff. Incremental runoff is dependent upon the
density of a project and the amount of landscaping and open space provided. A high density project with 20% or less area in
landscaping could expect to pay $4,500 per acre. A type detached single - family subdivision would pay approximately $1,500
per acre.
Resolution No. 2016 -046 N.C.S. Page I 1
Exhibit D
Status of Interfund Loans, Transfers, Refunds or Reallocation of Funds
Fiscal Year 2014 -15
Interfund Loans
The Storm Drainage Impact Fee fund lent the Storm Water Utility Operations fund $690,230 to cover storm water
maintenance costs from January 1, 2012 through June 30, 2014. Payment of principal and interest began on June 30,
2015 with a payment of $37,420. The balance as of 6/30/15 is $652,810. This loan is scheduled to be repaid by June
30, 2026.
The Community Facilities Impact Fee fund lent the Parks CIP fund $39,568 through June 30, 2015 to renovate the
Swim Center pool heating boilers. All payment of principal and interest are payable upon receipt of the PG &E
General On -Bill Financing Loan described in Resolution No. 2011 -170 N.C.S. and 2013 -004 N.C.S.
During FY14 -15, the Impact Fees Special Revenue Fund made a short term loan to the City Capital Projects Fund in
the amount of $990,774.
There were no Transfers, Refunds or Reallocation of Funds during FY 14 -15.
Resolution No. 2016 -046 N.C.S. Page 12