Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 2008-021 N.C.S. 01/28/2008 Resolution No. 2008-021 N.C.S. of the City of Petaluma, California ADOPTING THE WATER CONSERVATION PLAN WHEREAS, the City of Petaluma recognizes that water is an essential and limited resource; and, WHEREAS, the City of Petaluma's water conservation program has historically been designed to improve the water use efficiency of its customers; and, WHEREAS, as a signatory to the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Regarding Urban Water Conservation in California as coordinated by the California Urban Water Conservation Council (CUWCC), the City has been incorporating Best Management Practices (BMPs); and, WHEREAS, the City of Petaluma began the water conservation program by contracting the Sonoma County Water Agency for coordination and implementation; and, WHEREAS, the City of Petaluma hired a Water Conservation Coordinator in 2006 and began to expand the program beyond the required BMPs; and, WHEREAS, the Water Demand and Supply Analysis developed in support of the 2025 General Plan recommended a water conservation program that met the requirements of water offset and was cost effective, the water conservation measures were basically a continuation of the CUWCC BMPs. The City Council directed a study considering the entire breadth of water conservation measures, not strictly those recognized by the CUWCC, with the caveat that any measure selected must be feasible, cost effective, and attainable; and, WHEREAS, the Water Conservation Plan attached to and made a part of this resolution as Attachment A (Executive Summary and full copy in the City Manager's office) has been developed to supply 495 MG/Year and is comprised of 19 water conservation measures that are feasible and attainable by the City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council finds that adoption of this resolution is exempt from the Califo>-nia Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA guidelines (Title 14, Chapter 3 of the California Code of Regulations) because there is no possibility that the activity may have a significant effect on the environment. NOW, THERE)F'ORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Petaluma as follows: 1. The above recitals are true and correct and hereby declared to be findings of the City Council of the City of Petaluma. 2. The Water Conservation Plan attached to and made a part of this resolution as Attachment A (Executive Summary attached and full copy in the City Manager's office) is hereby approved and adopted. Resolution No. 2008-021 N.C.S. Page 1 3. The Director of the Department of Water Resources and Conservation ("Director") is authorized and directed to implement the City's Water Conservation Plan and the Director of Water Resources and Conservation is directed to monitor water saved and return to the City Council from time to time with recommendations for updates to the Water Conservation Plan to ensure that water supply needs are met. This Resolution shall become effective immediately and the Director is authorized and directed to commence implementation of the Water Conservation Plan by developing the Water Conservation Plan Ordinance and bring it back for City Council action as soon as feasible. 4. All portions of this Resolution are severable. Should any individual component of this Resolution be adjudged to be invalid and. unenforceable by a body of competent jurisdiction, then the remaining Resolution portions shall be and continue in full force and effect, except as to those Resolution portions that have been adjudged invalid. The City Council of the City of Petaluma hereby declares that it would have adopted this Resolution and each section, subsection, clause, sentence, phrase and other portion hereof, irrespective of the fact that one or more section subsection, clause sentence, phrase or other portion may be held invalid or unconstitutional. Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City. REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the ~,E~pro e as to Council of the City of Petaluma at a Regular meeting on the 28`h day of January, ~ fog 2008, by the following vote: ~_J City At~ey AYES: Barrett, Freitas, Harris, Nau, O'Brien, Vice Mayor Rabbitt, MayorTorliatt NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor Resolution No. 2008-021 N.C.S. Page 2 ATTACHMENT A SECTION ONE EXECUTIVE. SUM AY introduction The City of Petaluma's City Council approved funding to develop a Water Conservation Plan. The intent of the study was to evaluate and recommend the most cost effective water conservation plan based on an 80 year present worth, comprised of water conservation measures that are feasible, cost effective, and implementable by the City. The goal of the plan was to further implement water conservation beyond that recommended under the City's Water Demand and Supply Analysis conducted in June 2006. The City of Petaluma's current water conservation program provides a steady amount of water savings, but future additional savings provided by the program will start to diminish as the program reaches saturation. The Petaluma City Council wishes to continue the efforts of water conservation within the City of Petaluma to achieve further water conservation savings by implementing the next level of water conservation measures. All water conservation efforts to date have been factored alto the work. Water conservation is a key element for the City of Petaluma to meet future potable water demands. During the potable water supply analysis conducted under the City's Water Demand and Supply Analysis, additional water supply needs for the City of Petaluma to meet the potable water demand projections were quantified and aleast-cost, phased program to meet those needs was developed. Water supply sources included both potable water supply and offset sources. These sources included SCWA water, recycled water, water conservation, and growzdwater. To develop the Water Conservation Plan, the project team was hand selected based on their unique skills and expertise in the area of water conservation. 'The project team consisted of City staff from the Department of Water Resources and Conservation, Department of Community Development, and Department. of Parks and Recreation; landscape and irrigation experts, water conservation experts, the Department of Water Resources and Conservation s funding consultant, and consultants with extensive knowledge of the City's water system and demand and supply needs. The project team is shown in Figure 1-1. Water Conservation Pian ®eveloprnent Review of Pertinent Information Upon commencement of the Water Conservation Plan study, pertinent background materials were gathered and reviewed by the project team. These items included materials directly related to the City of Petaluma and independent materials related to water conservation. In addition to reviewing pertnent background materials on water conservation, ten water providers were surveyed about their water conservation programs and efforts. The project team developed the list of agencies to be surveyed based on similar climate, water supply challenges, and their innovative water conservation programs. vi ii2oos 1-1 #5320 Resolution No. 2008-021 N.C.S. Page 3 FIGURE 11 WATER CONSERVATION TEAM ORGANIZATIONAL CHART D • • M a MARGARET ORR MICHAEL BAN DEAN ECKERSON Engineering Manager Director Engineering Manager DAVID IRIBARNE STEVE SIMMONS Water Conservation Utility Manager Y ~ , Coordinator r DANA HUNT Project Manager I ~ t ~ _ f _ ,o ~ , ~ GARY DODSON MICHAEL MOORE GABE LANUSSE Principal-in-Charge GEORGE WHITE City of Petaluma- Parks 8 Recreation I MAY ZHAO IRENE BORBA Project Engineer RALPH ALEXANDER MICHAEL COOK Ralph Alexander & Assoc. - ---------i -z ~ a ~ ` BILL MADDAUS TOM GAFFNEY Maddaus Water Management Bartle Wells Associates EDWIN (NED) ORRETT Resource Performance Partners City of Petaluma Water Use Characteristics Prior to development of potential water conservation measures for inclusion into the City of Petaluma's Water Conservation Plan, it was essential that the project team members have an understanding of the City's existing and future potable water demands and wafer. use characteristics. The distribution of potable water demands to existing and future customer sectors and the final buildout water distribution among customer sectors were developed. In addition, existing and future potable water demands were categorized into indoor and outdoor uses. Water Conservation Plan Goal The establishment of a water savings goal for the Water Conservation Plan was based on the amount of additional potable water required to meet Buildout (Year 2025) demands, the confidence that the 1 /17!2008 1-2 #5320 Resolution No. 2008-021 N.C.S. Page 4 recommended supply sources outlined in the Water Supply and Demand Analysis can meet the projected buildout demand, and the ability of a water conservation program to achieve the goal established. The offset goal established for the Water Conservation Plan was 495 MG/Year by 2025 (Buildout). Although the annual amount of potable water that was established for offset via water conservation at Buildout (2025) under the Water Demand and Supply Analysis Project was 254.5 MG/Year, the goal established under the Water Conservation Plan by the project team exceeded this value. The goal was established to eliminate the need to use City-owned groundwater wells for potable water supply (the Water Demand and Supply Analysis Report determined groundwater would be needed during the 4 summer months starting in 2024 at a rate of 60.75 million gallons per year .and to satisfy 0.5 mgd of average day maximum day demand) and maintain groundwater as a reserve for emergency/backup use, and to allow fora 25 percent safety factor on the water conservation and recycled water offset requirements established under the Water Demand and Supply Analysis Report. Although the recommended water conservation program outlined in the Water Demand and Supply Analysis Report met the requirements of water offset and was cost effective, the water conservation measures were basically a continuation of the California Urban Water Conservation Council's (CUWCC) Best Management Practices (BMPs). For the Water Conservation Plan, the City considered the entire breadth of water conservation measures, not strictly those recognized by the CUWCC, with the caveat that any measure selected must be feasible, cost effective, and attainable. Development of Potential Water Conservation Measures The project team developed 202 potential water conservation measures for inclusion alto the City's final Water Conservation Plan. The potential water conservation measures developed were divided into two distinct categories; namely, measures that could be implemented "on-site" at future new development sites and measures that could be implemented "off-site' at existing sites. The measures were then organized by indoor versus outdoor water savings and placed into applicable customer sectors. The potential measures included programs, ordinances and controls, public outreach and billing items. Development of Evaluation Criteria Once the preliminary list of potential on-site and off-site water conservation measures was developed, the project team chose evaluation criteria which would be used to screen the potential conservation measures, determined the importance of each criterion, and identified any potential fatal flaws that would eliminate potential water conservation measures from further consideration to ensure a feasible and manageable program. Upon discussion and analysis of the proposed criteria by the project team, the team grouped related evaluation criteria and determined weights for the.. criteria and corresponding fatal flaws that would be used to select the most feasible and suitable measures. Evaluation of Potential Water Conservation Measures Once evaluation criteria were identified, potential water conservation measures were evaluated and a shortlist of 112 measures was compiled for further evaluation. The initial screening process used the fatal flaws to eliminate potential measures. The next step of the Water Conservation Plan process was to further reduce the number of potential water conservation measures and place the remaining measures into a water conservation program for further evaluation. Since many water conservation measures reduce the same water use (i.e. turf 1!17/2008 1-3 #5320 Resolution No. 2008-021 N.C.S. Page 5 .limits, proper landscape materials, and ET controllers all reduce irrigation use), each group of potential measures must be evaluated together in order to determine the net water reduction and the program's overall cost-effectiveness. A highly sophisticated computer model known as the Least Cost Planning Decision Support System (DSS) was used to complete this task. The model coordinates water savings between measures and does not "double count" water savuigs thus allowing the user to accurately calculate water savings for the overall program. The model is licensed through Maddaus Water Management and the California Urban Water Conservation Council (CLTWCC) and has been used by more than one hundred and fifty (150) communities throughout the world, including the City of Petaluma and SCWA, to analyze the cost effectiveness and water savings of water conservation programs. One hundred and twelve (112) water conservation measures, after the fatal flaw analysis, were compiled into comprehensive tables for future evaluation by the project team to determine which measures would be included in a water conservation program for further analysis using the DSS Model. The selected measures were then prioritized based on the evaluation criteria for inclusion into three water conservation programs each with a varying number of water conservation measures for further evaluation. For each of the water conservation measures remaining, the project team determined the customer sectors and implementation rate to be evaluated within the program. When the screening process was complete, twenty-eight water conservation measures remained for inclusion into one or more of the three water conservation programs to be modeled utilizing the DSS Model In addition, twenty-four other measures were identified as measures that would not be modeled, but rather included into the City of Petaluma's-Water Conservation Plan.. Such items reduce water use with little cost to implement, such as increasing publicity for water efficient products and requiring training of water conserving practices for landscape maintenance workers. Table 1-1 shows the twenty-eight water conservation measures selected for inclusion into one or more of the three water conservation programs for further evaluation utilizing the DSS Model. (D) denotes a requirementfor developers for implementing "on-site' measures. All measures were included in Program 3 with fewer measures included in Programs 1 and 2. TABLE 1-1 WATER CONSERVATION MEASURES INCLUDED IN WATER CONSERVATION PROGRAMS 1, 2, AND 3 y _ ~ ,'~~°hL'.~7 ~ ~ _ i • o ~ ~k_ ~ o io ~ c X.~ fi` i} _ s ` _I ~~~"~I _ C~ R ~i~j~ntidl `flat ~ Suwr~~ - In~1~c~r _ X X X ~ ~I R~_i~ential Water Surveys"-;Outdoor -:X X - ~ _ r,X - 7 - - - Plumbing P.etmfit Kits i(~ivea~~a~~s) X ~ X X , - , ~WatEi~Ea~-i-~cts<fur ~L~rge Iri;i~atoi s ~ Se~~acat f~n~te~ ~ i X I X - ~ X ":I Commer~ inl `Jat~i r~,u~~~t~ X _ X I X ,~Hi h;Effi,~ i-nc,;y~ i UVa~hin~~ Machin P.~zl~afe, ~ X _ ~ X ~.X - - - - Hi~h Effl~ i~ncy Wa~hin~ Machin? Regunem~nt iD> X ~ ~C 'C - - j~;New.E~i~ icnr~i~~Disf,washer'R 7uii~,~me~rt iD~ ~`~I ~ ~ ~ - X ~ - - X ~ ~ ~ ''1 High Effigy i_ney Faucets and Sf~u,:~arheads R ~aui~~n~ nt (D) X X X H~~t `Nat~i 5, stem ~ ~ .X _ X ~ X _Hi lh Effi i i~c~~ T ilct iHETi Rc~~iii~remri~t iC~l ~ X ~ X ~ X ~~Due~t'lia~stallat~on ~f HETs'foi: tn~,lets ~ `lall~n~ ~.~i X X ~ ~I flush ~~~~l~fi,,l(J%~-ao,v,in~~m~ a_s~iot~lir_,e)- _ 1 /17/2008 1-4 #5320 Resolution No. 2008-021 N.C.S. Page 6 5 , ~f' ~ , ~ ~ 1 .-,e-E-. +ai......,~_ z~. ~ - Mandate Retrofit on Resale (Urinals >1.6 gpf, Toilets ~ ~ X >3 5 gpfl _ _ ~~~~uire'0 5 gj.~f,oi Waterle§sUrin~loin~N~w Euil~~ings~ . 'X ~ ~ X X ~D:i _ a Wat~~ less Urinal Rebate - - - - _ - X' R'uf~lic.~lnfornation Pro rar~i~--`~ ~ ~:.X X X _ - - - Smart Irr~tion Contro~ler Reb 3tes- SF X _ X Sir~art`li-n2ati~n~ontt~ller Re,bates~fJ~n,SF - ~ ~X ~ X _ ~;~C Smart Controller with Rain-sensor Shutoff ©~~,~i~e ~ Requirement lD) X ~ X X ~ iLandscaF~eai=~dlii~tjOn Rc~U~rEt~7e-nts`iD) x X ~ ~ X ~ . - - - Financial Incentives/ Rebates for Irrigation Ul~gradr~ , X X X ~ Plan Ch~~ H.forR nog%ati~~n ~an~ fur'Naw Devel~E-~oerit ~ovei, 1000 sf,~'(~D.i ~ ~ ~ -_~X ~ X` ';~C ` Increase Enforcement of Land~~_~pe Rcquir, ~rcnts X - ~ 'I ~ ~ X - ~ i X ' i ~,eserti al Laid~c_i ~ni~,i ~Cia~s £s X New Accounts Reduced Connection Fees -for installing HE process equipment for selected X businesses (restaurants, laundry mat, food/groceries and hospital) (D) _ _ ..orR~~,~,et.h,~~~/~fin~~nc al ~ssi,tance _ - - - I - -a - X - ~ CIO Rebates -replace in~ffici_nt ,pater u~i~ ~5 equipment X i g I~Subrn te~in~ E7etc~ ~a~ h unit~Cty~ _ ~ 5;~ 'i ,,~X~ ;Y ~i (D) denotes a requirement for developers for implementing "on-site" .measures. Evaluation of Potential Water Conservation Program The three programs outlined ii Table 1-1 were analyzed for cost effectiveness and water savings using the Least Cost Planning Decision Support System (DSS) Model. The model developed a water demand baseline profile for the City of Petaluma. Wastewater savings and energy savings costs are also estimated and included in the cost benefit analysis. Projected water demands developed under the Water Demand and Supply Analysis Project were used to calibrate the model forecasts. Output data for the DSS Model for each program included the following information: e Program water savings for eac11 year of the program. e Program cost for each year of the program. e Benefit-cost ratios for each measure included in the program. Utility benefit-cost ratios include only the impact on the utility or City. Utility-developer benefit-cost ratios include the. impact on the utility as well as the developer who may have to pay increased coxulection fees or pay for more water conserving devices as a baselne cost to the development. Conununity benefit-cost ratios include the impact to the utility (City), developer, and customer. o Amount of water saved for each measure included in the program. The DSSModel output data for the three water conservation programs evaluated indicated total program water savings at Buildout (2025). The good news was that each program's water savings exceededthe established goal of 495 MG/Year. The water savings are shown in Table l-2. 1 /17/2008 1-5 #5320 Resolution No. 2008-021 N.C.S. Page 7 TABLE 12 PROGRAM 1, 2, AND 3 YEAR 2025 WATER SAVINGS o'~ - ~ ~ w 1 504 2.58 2 537 2.68 3 562 2.81 Water conservation measures are implemented over many years and it takes time for water savings to develop. Program costs were calculated within the DSS Model. Costs were developed based on cost to the utility (City) only and cost to the utility (City) plus development community. Table 1-3 summarizes these costs. TABLE 1$ PROGRAMS 1, 2, AND 3 COST INFORRflATION 1 ~ - - .r _ ~~L .gyp I, ~ ,Utl~lty+ _ Utl~lty+ li ~ ~ ~Utl~lty i~. Year Utility ~ ~ Developer ~Utility Dwe)oper ~ ~Utility~ Develo~er~'~~, - - ,I -.$O,YearPreseil_t;Worth~~Ana~s = _ 80 Year Present Worth $9,414,663 $29,827,881 $9,887,042 $30,427,168 $10,780,853 $31,888,882 Annualized 80 Year Present Worth $311,736 $987,653 $327,377 $1,007,497 $356,973 $1,055,897 ~Amn;,y~alize~ci'80, Year Pressent~~4/o,~~h/iUnat~,o~f~W~ater S~.v~ed $/MG $717 $2,270 $704 $2,165 ~ $723 $2,138 ($/Acre-Foot $234 $740 $229 $706 $236 $697 Note: All costs are in 2006 dollars On an 80 year present worth cost basis all three. programs evaluated are more cost effective than creating snore potable water supply. The annualized 80 year present worth cost per unit of water saved for Programs 1, 2, and 3 is less than the current cost to purchase and distribute SCWA water to the City of Petaluma's potable water customers. The current cost of purchasing potable water from SCWA and distributing the water to the City of Petaluma customers is $2,661/MG or $870/acre-foot. Since the three water conservation programs' water savings u1 Year 2025 exceed the City's needs and the Water Conservation Program goal of 495 MG/Year, the three programs were further evaluated by the project team. Water conservation measures that were more costly than others, saved only small quantities of water, or could be difficult to implement were removed. Feedback gathered from the community and City Council on September 10, 2007 was incorporated into the final program. Through this process, the water conservation project team was able to develop a recommended program that met the water conservation plan goal for water savings of approximately 495 MG/Year at buildout, but also reduced the cost of the overall program and. achieved a lower cost per unit of water saved. The recommended water conservation program includes nilneteen of the original twenty-eight water conservation measures modeled. A list of the recommended water conservation program's measures is shown in Table 1-4. 1 ! 17/2008 1-6 #5320 Resolution No. 2008-021 N.C.S. Page 8 TABLE 1-4 SUMMARY OF MEASURES INCLUDED IN THE RECOMMENDED WATER CONSERVATION PROGRAM ~p~ ~ x., - rye- , ~V~` r i - P1 i Residential Water Surveys -Indoor P,2 Residential UVat~rS~irve.y5 Qutd'oor, _ _ P~ Plumbing Retrofit Kits iGi~~.aways~ ''P'~ I G'V~t~r ~udget~ fo Lauae lrri' atsor_rs_ ~~F~arate MCt?rs P5 _ Commercial Water Audits ~P6 _ _ Hi~?h Effi'cicncy iHE~ Wa~hing;Mac.r~i.~c R hate _ _ ,i~ _ P7 HE Washing Machine Offer (Dj P3 HE~Fau~efs andSl~ov.~eihcarls.Reyuiiement~~6Di I PS HE Toilet IHETI Requirem~nf ID) P 1~0 ~ ii ~~City~ P~iicfoasP anI~rtaJl HET,s lui in~ls 1 G~gpf ~~ilcts ~ ~pty_ - P1 1 Publ~~ Information Program ~~~P 1?~ ~ . S~ia~it~--Ii_i~ig~tion~CoulJe~ Rehat~s,,N'~n ~SF ~ _ P1~, Smart Controller~ti~ith Rain-sensor Shutoff De_vi~ e Rr~iuirzm~nt (D_) _ ~:P~1~~ = Landscapz and'Irngatioh' R'eq~iiiem~ents,iDl . P1 ~ Application process for Landsca~c Renovation ~ -1o~ni ,f a~~-1 ~ ,u~ti iD)~ ''P1 r i I'ncr~as~ Enfo~~ ~~,1~cnt ~f.Landseai~c Regu~r,eta~en`s ~ _ P1 ~ Residential Lands ape Training (,lases P1~ i Hx,o.t,~ r~Tit ~,~~~;fina~c~al_~s~i~ a,,.~.nce,,~ _ - - P19 Submeterin ,meter each unit (b Cit) (D) denotes a requirement for developers for implementing "on-site" measures. Recommended V~/ater Conservation Program Since the development of the water conservation programs 1, 2, and 3 and measures described in Section 5, three changes were made to the recommended program. First, California passed AB 715 which requires that on or after January 1, 2014, all toilets and urinals sold and installed u1 Califonua be high efficiency models; therefore, measures P-9 and P-10 were revised to start implementation in 2008 and stop implementation at the end of 2013. Second, measure P-10 was modified from a mandated retrofit at resale program with City rebate to a program where the City will purchase and install high efficiency toilets for customers with high flow toilets. Third, highly efficient washing machines will be offered as part of the purchase package to buyers of new homes and not required to be installed by developers. This change was implemented following discussions with the community and City Council on September 10, 2007, November 20, 2007, and January 15, 2008. The model for the recommended water conservation program was updated and rerun to reflect the restructuring of measure P-10 and P-7 and for incorporation of AB 715 into measures P-9, P-10, and future water demand projections. Modifications to the program are anticipated as laws change, technology advances, and participation levels fluctuate. Thus, the City has obtavled the DSS Model and can track and enhance the program as necessary in the coming years to meet the annual water savings. The recommended water conservation program contains nineteen (19) measures. These measures are outlined in Table 1-5. Table 1-5 provides the measure number, name of measure, customer sector(s) affected, and a description of the measure. 1 /17/2008 1-7 #.5320 Resolution No. 2008-021 N.C.S. Page 9 TABLE 1~ RECOMMENDED 1AIATER CONSERVATION PROGRAM MEASURES j ~ r~ o _ i. This is the indoor component of water surveys for Existing existing single-family and multi-family residential P1 Residential Water Customers: SF, customers. Normally those with high water use are Surveys -Indoor MF targeted. Water use evaluations that are marketed by realtors during the time of resale and customer call-ins are also included in this program. - Tf~is-i5~thaoutdoo~r'c~n=+~ anent of~watersur=vay5 for . F.esidrotial Water. E .istin~ ~~stin~ ~in~l~ fa~iiil? and multi-famil? i~sider~tial u,tu~~~~rs N~r~nall~, those v~ith high U at ruse ate R2 Suru~~ s ' Customers SF , :outdoor ~ f~~F~ ~ tar~otcJ ~~'Jatzr us,e_e?a~uations,that a~~e rnarke~~d b~_~ - r?~It~oi s ~i~n iig the,;t~ir7~e of,r sale;and ~eistom~r'r all=ins ai e~:al~o~ r~~fu"dcd i~~ this ~hrograr~ii., Provide owners of pre-1992 homes with retrofit kits that Plumbing Retrofit Existing contain easy-to-install low flow showerheads, faucet P3 Kits (Giveaways) Customers: SF, aerators, hose end nozzles, and toilet tank leak MF detection devices. These are also provided during survevs. U`'ater Budgets E~istin~ ancl~Ne~~~ Pi,c~vicie III iir~~ator` of Iari~~scai~G~:~~~ith'separ~te for ;Larga C,ust~ r ~ rs= P4 t ~ in~i~ation auc~unts~~rn~~th a~iiionthly n-rig'ati~n wat~'r use'< ~ _ liuga ors L~r~P li~i~atcus ~n ; l,urig'eton tn, ~,vafer~bill=: - iS~"~~rate'_f~1,~t~,~,~ C,10: TI)~F~ _ Commercial Existing Offer high water use accounts a free water audit that P5 Water Audits Customers: CIO would evaluate ways for the business to save water and money. ~~ffcrhurn~o~~ners,a rebate. on an~wwatgrefTiricnt' High E,,"ficgn y E~ i~tin~ ~ ~ - '~~P6 pHE~)'JJ~s1~in~ l~~_i~t~~;m~is:~SF ~ ~the~ ~ash~r Rehat~s~~?II fez i~rfered-`o hu~inessasif ~N1ac'~inz~R~ebate -f~~F.:Cl~ ' ~'"u'rrsta i ~hnit water savings foal usinc seswas-nct- iiclude'~i inrthe modal HEWashing Require developers to offer to install an efficient washer P7 Machine Offer New Customers: before new home, commercial, or public building (p) SF, MF, CIO occupancy. HE,F~uczts~~n~1 New La_tun~~-r~~ ~ R~griire ~~e~~rl~p,es to~irast-all Lavat~r.y~~faucr-,ts~ffi~t fow - P3 Siio~ti~rhaads SF;'MF C,10 a rio;~~ u~~'.tl~an 1 5 yp~~~;kitcli`ei~~faucat~,at2~-?.ypm ~'_-i Requireri~cnt r Cla - IN~T ~ _ 3nd~aho~?~rhaa~~~:at 2 ~7; gpm High Efficiency New Customers: Require developers to install high efficiency toilets P9 Toilet (HET) SF, MF, CIO, (HETs) for new development from 2008 to 2013. The Requirement (D) INST plumbing code requirement begins in 2013. • ~ ~t, ~o r ur~.ha~a end install HETs ~ 1 3 g't~f) for' E istin~ ~ it~Pur~ha~e ~ ' ~ ~ ustumr i~ vt~th bi~h fiow~tcilats fr~~m thrdu~h ~~1 'P10 Lu~t„n~~i'~`_SF a~~j~In ,taII~HETs ~ ity~,ia ti~;~ik.througln a contrarfcr and-~i'I targat~piibl_ic f~1F..:IC~ST ~ , f-~rili~t~~s ~n'~ thin`-hign v:atci uszr~ ~ . ~ 1 /17/2008 1-8 X5320 Resolution No. 2008-021 N.C.S. Page 10 't. o _ o ~ k; D ~ o e a 0 ~ Public Raise awareness for water conservation with public P11 Information Existing and New education programs such as seminars, video, speakers Program Customers: SF to community groups, radio and television time, and .printed educational material such as bill inserts. Smart Irrigation ~ ~ Exists ~g Pro~(c~~ a r~bat fc~r the purchase of a SMART iniyation ~ont~~~lri an~J ~~~~ciatea signal fE~~ _,~ssunie one P12 Contioller.~ Custcme~~ ~~:MF ~ ~ f ~ ~ controllc~ ,~~r sife~~N1inimum h~iti~cihanf~o~qun~.ements at-_' P.eha,es~ CIc~;`INST leaut'~UO~sf of ~~,~ell`naarntaine~J turf. Smart Controller New Customers: P13 with Rain-sensor SF, MF, CIO, Require installation of smart controllers with rain sensor Shutoff Device INST shut off for all new irrigation systems. Requirement (D) ,En`c~n_N a<re~ulatioii tha`spc~_ifiES that,_!an~s's.aj~es he.~ esi~gne~i~ai~d,i~stallc~i ~ce~>~ding~toJ,~atei cfficierit ` Lan~l~~ai~eand N~v? Cr~~toi~r,e~s ~•P1~4 Iru~a~ion ~ SF' (V?F ~iC~ {_r ncil~al5 vith ~l l,i~,l ~i~« i~~~~~ti~n ~;stcros 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~Comb~~r~~ ~h ~~ro~~t C~;ntioll~rli5~td.ahoae)=Goal is ,REC~uirenients iD> INST _ an overall 25 rc~au~_tioncr.i~n~gati~~n~~:~tei use.. - Incl~i~i,~ ~'~ian ~c~trv~~ 3, ~~~„rt of fro ect alb ~r~ ~~I ~i~oc~ ss.:_` Application Existing Process for Customers Developer or contractor to submit application to the City P15 Landscape (>1000 sf and < for approval of renovations greater than 1000 sf and Renovations 5000 sf): MF, less than 5000 sf. >1000 sf and < CIO, INST 5000 sf Ins ~~~ease ~ ~ ~ En`g~~,enrent of E~i~tmg ~ ~ Enfo~:r~•IanJ~cape~cgUire"~nrnts~un r.,~;io~a~cd an~~n°~^~ ".P1 ~ ~ ~ Custun~_~s` CIO ~irve!ui~~~~ent,~nascal.ing ir~~lodi~~~g u~e~~_t lowtia~e~ rise-~' La~~~cau~ INST MF.: hlan~~san~~:etfiri2nti~ii~aticn Re,'kun~enients. Residential Combination of three types of training classes: (1) Low P17 Landscape Existing and Water Use Landscaping (2) Homeowner Irrigation, and Training Classes New: SF (3) Promotion of Water Efficient Plants. F~~~r,v.~n~~ a'n~~.r~,:at~r ai~~iit ~f`?i~th,. hotel a ~~f»te fir • Hotel R~ti:oft ~y~~ipmFnt ificntif~e~~ ~h~t ,r~rul~ say ~.~at~~ ~P~.r-~~~i~~a. E~i~ting P1 ~ ,rtiti fi~n~~~~i~l - ~ hates h~dulc ~~~r _~rtam rffi~ i~~i~t guil~m nf,~u~ h.as Cu~ton «CIO _ ~a~~istance) ~n'ei~~le~i~ieein~ehi~es`s`.~amers'.~n~ashcescs~ling: t~~~,^.~e~is ~~~~~J~;sp»y,r~nse ~,al ~s.~' _ _ _ _ . City to require submetering of each commercial unit, submetering, New Customers: such as strip malls, and all multi-family accounts. Sub- P19 meter each unit MF, CIO, INST meters may be provided by the City or the owner depending upon congestion issues for efficient installation. (D) denotes a requirement for developers for implementing "on-site" measures. Model output data for the recommended water supply program is izlcluded uz Table 1-6. 1 /17/2008 1-9 #5326 Resolution No. 2008-021 N.C.S. Page 11 TABLE 1-6 WATER CONSERVATION MEASURES INCLUDED IN THE PETALUMA RECOMIVIENDED WATER CONSERVATION PROGRAM - ~~-m_ r'•. ? ,i ~ ~ x ~ 1 ~..Y i ~i ~ a lt; ~ } r ti ` ~ ~ w y F:,R.' Y~ ~ _ tL~Jti ? ~ ` e ~I' h. y - )r} `F~ - i~ Y` i " .r ~~~L~ ~ ~~iVr - i ~-t - 1 *.i ..7.i 1_.' ,~,w ~y. rl'{~ ~ *!.-~!5 'Y - 1 x"} T ~ 'a ..Z' _ _ ' ~~2*~i1,. "`a"g ~s ~ ;~Y"'r -.-~~~-H. w+~^ ~d,',~ S t ~ y}.[:' 1~,. I4,~ ~~5 -rte" 4 ~~t I ~ ~ 1d,• ~.~r : ~_.R. k ~ , ~ -+',kr i~ } ~~r<i.. y ~~c< eft:'-~b, _.:4,. ° _ : ~ - s - f _ - - _ ~ , _ V _ ~ 1 F r i;1~nU.~l it i 5in ~y:> Iii 1 -ice ~ F ~ F.1~ ~ 1 bU tJ ,4~ ~ . , ~G '100 ~ 3r) f - I tsid~n~ial.~~. ! i+ci Suiv~ys r ~~itdu~i,~ ~ i ~-_~E- ' ~;5~ f.l~~:: 1 "b 1~~` _ ~N,i1 1~.~, - 'f~ 5 ~ - .1,0~~ 3U - I F ~ i~ r~nti,il F~ti ,trt V~ it ~ ~i~~ + C ~ ~F f.1F i ~ r'ate~ burlgFt ~~,r.La~~e Irii~ <~turs iSe~erate r' fl ~ 11 4 ~5 r; i ~4 - (l~:t~~is~ ~ - - - - - ~<E N I.~ . - ~'I~J TUFF _ ~ 5f;_:~ N H ~~_5G - ~3; 3 = ~~il~, ~ i 5~ ~-:~~i P6 i Cori~r~~_~.aah .,~tHrHii~Jits~ _ E CIO ~ 1. PJ„~ I 1 '~i 10 _ r ~ ~ F t' r~lutli~ , !asher,Kebate Iriccntivr-- ' E 5~_P1F Cli_i - --=a1 ~ _ 0_.~,~~ 11 ~ ~ 1;U , _ _ . Hrgh Efficiency (HE) Washing Machine, - P7 ~~ffer D N ~ SF,MF r,10 41 ~ _0.89 U s4 ~ 1u(~ ~ Indefinite - _ - _ _ w~.~ ~ . , _ - - - ~ - ~ FIL F iuceis anrr Sl~~c~~r_~Fe~~Js-Requnrrnent ~ ~ ~ ~ f __~P`~`_ iF~)'-. ~ I~- ~ 1-fvlF~;~~;.,~)N~F.~~ ~1i11, ,~4d1,. 1~I~ - l~i'7 1:OU Ii~ilef~~iFa o - - - - - - ~ - Hi~th Etfi~~i~~n,y I vilet ~I ICTi F uirtmcnt c i F i DI - ~ tJ ~T f.1F ~~I~~~. IN ~ 1 1 ~ U~~ ~ U i ~ 0_i r, - 00 ~ Inds finite 15 1 i z ~ Pli~ _i ~?ity,"~Fuich~ise ~in~l I~ii~tall HF~ <; - ~F ;;F _f.1F INST t) ~'S ~ I ~~J ti _ , 0.`L5 444:.'( II 'S 5__ N o P11 I Pi_,blic Information Program _ F,N I ~F 1 96 I N,r~ _ -3.x!7 4 Varies i0_ - - :;niait liii~(irotiullrn F;~~ - _ o t rtc. ~ stc~i~ : , P, ~ '~_i~I~Gr _ "__C_ f~1F.~ fU INS ~ 1 OZ~ ~~J~H~` ~ U ~~4 - 1~4,~7 ~ 2~~ ' 1~, _ . z ~ m~~rt liir_Jatirri _:onh ~Il~,r w Fain Nn~vr C] N1:'~ F. is~~Jul~ viicnt iC~~ ~d ~~F I~1F,C10 RJST Ali 1~ 1 15 Lei 4c~ 10U IndE~li~rite F'14 _ l ~r~~rlscape~~d l,rrri-gation F'c {uir_enents•~C~i ~ ~~d SF f~1F r.10;_.IN~T - ,1-~~,~ Ci 1 ~ _ 0;14___ - ~1~~ 100` lidr finiie,~`~~, _ _ _ application Process for Lind ~~P F l~ ~ P:1F r_,I! ~.IG~S I _ 0 41 ~ ~D F~.rr~rt - - i - s 1000 sfan i ~ ~>~G~ ~ all lip aliuN100% 10 N > ; enovation Incic~ e~'.E oicc:m~ent c,F L='~ii~risc~r~~ ~~~i ~ I ~ Fequii~ment fur ruriwatc~~I~i~Jsc~iE~irr-~,~5~` >1u~lit ~ip~~,ii ~.^~~~i~k ~_~'_l!~ ~ ~~ri~,i~ittFrl iri'P„15 ~"_F ~ L1F`~CI~~ IN_Sl- ~ ~N r - t~'1.o ~`4 ~~~ni~l tiFn:,- Ind tiinte P 1~ ~ I ancls~_ the L- Ju .~lii,ii Ti,~ini~~ ~ hi ~gi~iiii F PJ `~F J ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ 1 , t. 1~U pcu} I~,'vr ~ Inde~iiiite - i - _ P~10_ ~ Hotel. F~,Lrofit :4^l-fir5an~ic~l~s i~t~iiceJ _ ~E"_... ~::.~~1~~. ~ 0 30'~. ~__:,~N,.f+ 0 ~~3 _ ~'r~, , P19 Submetering, Meter Each Unit ~ N ~MF, CIO, INST 11.15 , 3.72 ~ 4.29 ~ 22.1 ~ 100% ~ Indefinite (D) denotes a requirement for developers for implementing "on-site" measures. 2 Benefit-cost ratio is a ratio of benefits, estimated from cost savings due to purchasing less water from SCWA, and the costs, estimated from the indicated party's cost to fund rebate programs, check that requirements have been made, install devices, etc. The higher the benefit-cost ratio, the more cost effective the water conservation measure is to the party indicated compared to the other measures considered. ti Benefit-cost ratios and water savings for individual measures do not add up to total benefit-cost ratio and water savings for the program. ~ Results include passage of A6715 in October 2007 which requires that all toilets and urinals sold and installed be high efficient models by January 1, 2014. ,i~ 7i2oos N ~.-1~ #5320 The DSS model output data for the recommended program indicates a total annual water savings of 448 MG/Year in Year 2025 and an Average Day Maximum Month (ADMM) reduction of 2.39 mgd in Year 2025. The information is presented in Table 1-7 and can be seen graphically in Figure 1-2. TABLE 1-7 RECOMMENDED PROGRAM WATER SAVINGS r , _ vy ~ o r ~ o o ~ 0 ~ o ~ i - - Zo I = -,010 ~ 1~9 1 1~ L - I ~~'01'1 r° ~ 1 C~9 . _ 153.,- _ _ 1~ 3~J 2012 04 ~ 1~1 ~~~134 1 59 ` ?G~13 3~1 I,~ ~ 1 _ _ ~ 1 i0 - - - _ _ 201= ~ 374 1-~0 i 234 1 g3 2016 ^ u~~ 150 - 2 ~6 _ _ ~ ? 16 r X01-~ ~ 1 ,2 - 1 - 2 emu, ~ - 013 ~ - I ~ ~ - ~ - ~ ? ,cl' _ -i i 4~ 15~~ _ ~J ~ r~ X020 -1 1 ~ ~ ~1 + - ~ ; ' X022 -1, 1 ~U 278 2.34 . _ ?,V'kLJ G;uUi~!~lJU cl_~_.~dv _i~~~, 23~ _ - ~ _ ~ As a result of incorporating AB 715, the amount of indoor water savings within the recommended water conservation program has decreased. The overall combined water savings from the effect of the updated plumbing code which incorporates AB715 and the recommended water conservation program results in a potable water offset that exceeds the established goal for this project of 495 MG/Year. The recommended water conservation program results in a water savings of 448 MG/Year. The increase un water savings from the building code is estimated to be 55.6 MG/Year. Therefore the total net water savings is 503.6 MG/Year. 1 /17/2008 1-11 ;tsazo Resolution No. 2008-021 N.C.S. Page 13 FIGURE 1-2 WATER SAVINGS EACH YEAR FOR THE RECOMMENDED WATER CONSERVATION PROGRAM 500 450 }Current City Program through 2008 400 --0-Recommended Program (2008-2025) ~ 350 ~ 300 N ~ 250 ~v ~ 200 a~ r R ~ 150 100 50 0 2004 2009 2014 2019 2024 Year The recommended program s costs were calculated using the DS5 r?Iodel. Annual program costs as well as annualized 80 year present worth cost and annualized 80 year present worth cost per unit of water saved are included in Tables 1-8 and 1-9. These costs were calculated based on the cost to tl~n City of Petaluma (Utility) only and cost to the utility plus development community. Recommended Water Conservation Program 80 Year Present Worth values are summarized in Table 1-8. Table 1-9 describes annual capital and operations costs for implementation of the nineteen water conservation measures under the recommended program for Years 2008 through Year 2025. All. measures start uz Year 2008 except measure P12 which starts i11 Year 2010. On an 80 year annualized present worth basis, the recommended water conservation program is more cost. effective than any of the three preliminary programs evaluated (Table 1-3), more cost-effective than obtauiing additional water for the City through City-owned groundwater wells ($3,416/MG or $1,113/acre-foot), and. even more cost-effective than the current cost to purchase potable water from SCWA and distribute it to the City's potable water customers ($2,662/ MG or $870/ acre-foot). Hence, water conservation is the most economical new water supply/offset source currently available to the City of Petaluma and the Development Community. TABLE 1$ RECOMMENDED WATER CONSERVATION PROGRAM 80 YEAR PRESENT WORTH COSTS t 4.; 80 Year Present Worth $7,126,129 $24,895,880 Annualized 80 Year Present Worth $235,959 $824,346 Annualized 80 Year Present $612 / MG $2,137 / MG Worth/Unit of Water Saved $199 /acre-foot $696 /acre-foot 1 /17!2008 1-12 tt5320 Resolution No. 2008-021 N.C.S. Page 14 TABLE 1-9 RECOMMENDED WATER CONSERVATION PROGRAM ANNUAL COST ~ ; ~ ~ i 5• - ~ ~'i F r d ' ~)-.-,-r.-+ B o o •p ' f' j: 1~.f: } ~ ~ ~1i ~~~y f .~iC 7~ ~ ~i11C 0 rr i~~ c ~ , 6 ~ X91 '~5C~ ~24U~ 11 ~ i C? 872,.°68 126.156 0?.998,368 . ~4~-J 1 J 1~~.15~ _ _ _ _ _ ~ _ 2 r~` ~ , ` ~ ~ ~ ~ -~~~'c~ ~1G "0~ FMS;' 4~ bf~4,54~ i' ~16.~J2~1 `-~2 ,-~~1 ~ G J.~; ,,4E i ~ 1 ~ 1` 6 J 4 - - 1 L~ 10 50~ 1 _ X140 u/ U I ~t,4~~ `0.z 2U4 ~4 ~ `a) 110.4f~4 514u FJ' 8 1 r; ~ ~c - ~ ~ F 1 z~ ,u>> ~ ,G -a<<: ~~5 S?:~619 64.8 _ -0-1-1 ..~~lE?,0_,~,OU 1 ~~c ~~5 ,nn~8E:_.~9~ ~~„0,~ 1 °w ~ ~ P-~, r~,.~ _ ~ - - - _ 01 $409,232 ~ 1 1 ~ ,566 $526 798 $2 0:' ' 3 S ' 441 4t;G S1 1 ~ 5+~6 02 55~i 0~1 - - _ 2U1'~_ ~4h , 40~+ _ S1 ~1 ~ 30 $59~~8u ' ~~2 03 '1~, ~I 4g~~~ 1~ 0_l~ 1 ~ eG ~?.6~0 494 - - _ t+14 _ r~4 F~ ~ d8.5, I $46 ~."4 ,1 9+~C+ , -~+;S,U~ 5 I ~Ct~ ~ .'~r i~63 > - , , ~ c~ ~ c ; 01 ~ ~ ~ _ ~ 10C? 1 ~t~`+ -'.$46~ ,5 ~ .,1 -i~ i 1 0~ ~ ~ Orb ~.1 0 1 '~_G _ 5~',~ ~ 0 22 _ 1~ ~~5~ ~u`'~ ~5h J00 :b314 hGJ li :;,~~5 l J44 ~ 1 240 '~U 1 ~ SSF. 300 ~ 1 2c~h eCJ2 o - _ - 201 y,L`~i +~,1 ~~~~E_5U4 - . -,°:~31,`=i 5)5 ~Ju2 ~f~5 ` ~I_` ~1 2=11'436, _ ~5b 504 v1 ~'-rJ~~41~~ i ~o ~~1~' ~~l ~ y~v`J b`cJ l0 ~~1+~~ 4~.~~J_ ~ ~ 0211 4f,J ~ W,,i~ 1~~, ~ ~.`~-10 9'~C~ ~ - - - _ i Z - - - - ~ ~o ~ E - _ _ ~ ~ v ~o _ ~ ` ~ - ~7 ~ , ~'U lu _ ` 1 1 ~ 4`JV ~ . JJO.;~O,J , ~J1~1~~,U+J~ J it-tJ 1 J;, _ J! u65 I `~Jt Jam- ~ .~,5LV US.J o I + ~2n 12" 1 i : 14~ 25n - 7~ i t+^ _ $498 354 ~ 028 r+~+; _ ~S~G ~4 $3 E~34;+ ~~04 ~ ~ '++~1 ~1~ r`it=, F;34 ~ ~ .wl`2 ~',~0 $41' u'.5: -$;535;6.21 :~2° c~~ ~F~ N u~2 12 _ ~~3_~~ 4 _ :15.430 ' u41 1 25 $535,700 S25 u74 S564 455 n ''u~`; ~ 121 1'~ ~,2~.~ 1~~1 w 14~+:2~' ~ ~-11_'2 0'23 i -_653 2 1_':; S2~ 0 ;4_ S5%.1 2u0: ~ ~ 4 _ 1 1 ~ -u ~ - _ 14 + - ~ ` 041 ~ ^ 0~ 34 1 S2b u~36 ~`~6 1 40~ + ~ ~ ~ t 3"1;21 <14C~' 02d;~OJ. X0140 5~ ~ _ 54' 1 ~ + ~2 1 ~ ~~~63 4E~ ~ X22.09 i S561 ,64`, CD 1 /17/2008 1-13 #5320 Funding IVlechanism The recommended water conservation plan modifies the overall recommended water supply project outlined in the Water Demand and Supply Analysis Report dated June 2006. The modifications include increased water conservation, elimination of City-owned groundwater well supply, and incorporation of a contingency factor to ensure that potable water demands will be met. To meet the annual buildout shortfall amount of 772.72 MG/Year and the ADMM shortfall amount of 5.0 mgd as outlined i, the Water Demand and Supply Analysis Report, both the recommended water conservation plan detailed herein, and the recycled water system developed within the Water Demand and Supply Analysis report, will need to be implemented. Combined, they are referred to as the recommended water supply project. An update to the City's water utility capacity charge for new development was prepared based on the recommended water supply project. The charge incorporates the cost for additional potable water supply through recycled water and water conservation offset. The Water Capacity Charge Update was prepared by Bartle Wells Associates. The capacity charge defrays the capital costs of facilities to serve growth. The capacity charge includes abuy-in for the value of the City's existing facilities, a proportion of planned water capital improvements cost, and the cost for new water supply as described herein. Bartle Wells Associates is currently developing an updated water capacity fee study that will address the improvements and projects outlined i1 this report as well as review current water, storm water, and wastewater charges. This report is scheduled to be submitted in February of 2008. This section. will be updated after approval of the revised study. Implementation The water conservation program developed is projected to save 448 MG/Year by Year 2025. This program is very aggressive and will require considerable effort by City staff to implement. Since the program must start in Year 2008 to achieve the water savings goal in Year 2025, the City should begin work immediately to get the required ordinances, development standards, and programs in place. Of the nineteen measures identified for implementation, five of the measures are directly related to new development and will require developers to utilize water efficient practices and install certain water efficient devices. A detailed implementation plan for each of the water conservation measures between Year 2008 and Year 2025 (Buildout) has been developed to aid the City to implement the program. The City has obtained a copy of the DSS Model for in-house use. This model is a powerful tool and will serve as a great asset to the City throughout implementation of the program. The model should be updated annually with the actual implementation data for each measure to determine if the City is on track to meet the water savings goal. h1 addition, the model can be modified to determine how implementation rate adjustments and changes such as additions or deletions of measures will affect the fiial water savings outcome. The program developed under this study is meant. to be an evolvilg program allowilg the City to adjust implementation rates and/or measures over the life of the program to meet changing conditions and techulology over the life of the 18-year plan to achieve the overall water savings goal. lit addition to the standard and proven implementation practices developed for the Water Conservation Plan, the City will work with Ned Orrett during the initial startup of the water 1 /17/2008 1-14 #5320 Resolution No. 2008-021 N.C.S. Page 16 conservation program to develop a pilot test for one or more of the recommended off-site water conservation measures to explore an alternative implementation program. The program will seek to remove common barriers found in traditional water conservation programs associated with purchasing and installing proven, cost effective equipment. Under such a program, the City would incur setup costs for the program, but the overall program may be more cost effective and yield higher water savings than traditional implementation. 1 /17/2008 1-15 #5320 Resolution No. 2008-021 N.C.S. Page 17