HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 99-158 N.C.S. 08/02/1999
' ~eSO1UtIOI1l~lO._ 9.9-158 1~1.C.~.
2 of the City of Petaluma, California
3
4
5
6
7 DENYING AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF
8 AN APPEAL BY THE SAME PARTY WHICH CONTESTED THE
9 ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL, OF THE CARSON TENTATIVE
to PARCEL MAP, 101 GRANT AVENUE, AT THE LNTERSECTION OF
11 GRANT AVENUE AND GRANT COURT, APN 008-510=006 & 079
12
13
14 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the appeal filed by Bryant
15 Moynihan of the Larson Tentative Parcel Map (file no. TPM99001), on June 22, 1999, after
16 giving notice of said hearing in the manner, .for the period, and in the form required by
17 Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S., as amended; and
18
19 WHEREAS, at the end of the public hearing the Planning Commission voted 4-1 to deny the
20 appeal on all points raised by the appellant, as documented in the Commission staff report and
21 meeting minutes of June 22, 1999; and
22
23 WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on August 2, 1999 on the appeal filed. by
24 Bryant Moynihan contesting the Planning Commission's determination, after giving notice of
25 said hearing, in the manner, for the period, and in the form required by Ordinance No. 1072
26 N.C.S., as amended; and
27
28 WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the Planning Commission staff report and meeting
29 minutes, and taken public testimony on the appeal; and
30
31 WHEREAS, the City Council hereby denies the appeal based upon the following findings:
32
33 1. That the Planning Commission reviewed the documentation of the June 22, 1999
34 Commission staff report, heard public testimony, and denied the appeal of the Larson
35 Tentative Parcel Map.
Resolution No. 99-1 518 N.c.s. Page 1 of 2
1 2. That the Larson project, as a four lot land division with a designated remainder, is
2 consistent with the Subdivision Map Act and with Title 20, Subdivisions, of the
3 Municipal Code. Therefore, a Tentative Parcel Map is appropriate for the project and a
4 Tentative Subdivision Map is not required.
5
6 3. That the Larson project will provide frontage improvements, including sidewalks, to the
7 southernmost end of the remainder lot, which is appropriate to address the impacts of the
8 project.
9
10 4. That the conditions applied to the Larson Tentative Parcel Map are appropriate to the
11 project and are the same conditions which would be applied regardless of whether it was
12 a Tentative Subdivision Map.
13
14 5. That requiring a sidewalk from the end of the Larson remainder parcel to "I" Street
15 would not meet the nexus requirement, and that this is not an appropriate condition to
16 apply to the Larson map regardless of whether it is a Tentative Parcel Map or a Tentative
17 Subdivision Map.
18
19 6. That it is appropriate to designate the remainder lot as such since there is an existing use
20 on the site, the use will continue, and there is no ability to subdivide the lot further.
21
22 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Petaluma does
23 hereby deny the appeal of the Larson Tentative Parcel Map.
Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City.
REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the Approved as to
Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Regular) (~,)b1si~)6) meeting form
on the .2nd day of ........August...................................., 19..99., by the
following vote:
City Attorney
AYES: Healy, Torliatt, Cader-Thompson, Hamilton, Maguire, Mayor Thompson
NOES: None
ABSENT: Keller
ATTES'T':
.-.....y
City Clerk Ma or
Gbuncil Films........._
~ ~ «,.H~ ~z~ N~,.....9.9-.15$....... rv.cs. Page 2 of 2