Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 2011-016 N.C.S. 01/31/2011Resolution No. 2011 -016 N.C.S. of the City of Petaluma, California A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PETALUMA AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF TAX INCREMENT FUNDS FOR SPECIFIED PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES, ADOPTING FINDINGS REQUIRED BY HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 33445, AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE PETALUMA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION AND THE CITY OF PETALUMA WHEREAS, the Petaluma Community Development Commission ( "Agency ") is a redevelopment agency formed, existing and exercising its powers pursuant to California Community Redevelopment Law, Health and Safety Code Section 33000 et seq. ( " CRL "); and, WHEREAS, pursuant to authority granted under the CRL, the City Council ( "City Council ") of the City of Petaluma ( "City ") has adopted and amended, from time to time, the Redevelopment Plan (the "Redevelopment Plan"). The Agency has responsibility to implement the Redevelopment Plan for the Central Business District Project Area and the Petaluma Community Development Project Area (the "Project Areas "); and, WHEREAS, in keeping with the goals of the Agency to eliminate blight in the Project Areas in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan and Agency's current Implementation Plan ( "Implementation Plan "), the City and Agency have been working cooperatively regarding the development of certain public improvements in the Project Areas; and, WHEREAS, the City and Agency have determined that it would be mutually beneficial to enter into a Cooperative Agreement (the "Agreement ") a copy of which is on file with the City Clerk and Agency Secretary, pursuant to which the Agency would agree to pay for certain public improvements and other activities to be undertaken by the City in the furtherance of the redevelopment of the Project Areas; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 33445 of the CRL, the Agency may, with the consent of the City, pay for all or a portion of the cost of the land for, and the cost of construction of, any building, facility, structure, or other improvements that are publicly owned and located within or contiguous to the Project Areas if the City Council finds based upon evidence in the record, including, in particular and without limitation the evidence provided in the Staff Report dated January 31, 2011, that: (1) The acquisition of the land or the installation or construction of the buildings, facilities, structures, or other improvements that are publicly owned are of benefit to the Project Areas, by helping to eliminate blight within the Project Areas or providing housing for low- or moderate - income persons; and, Resolution No. 2011 -016 N.C.S. Page 1 (2) No other reasonable means of financing the acquisition of the land or the installation or construction of the buildings, facilities; structures, or other improvements that are publicly owned, are available to the community; and, (3) The payment of funds for the acquisition of land or the cost of buildings, facilities, structures, or other improvements that are publicly owned is consistent with the implementation plan adopted pursuant to CRL Section 33490. WHEREAS, the action approved by this Resolution, entering into a cooperative funding agreement for payment of costs associated with future activities, including the Auto Center Drive, the Brownfields Program, the Economic Development Program and the cross -town connector portion of the Rainier Avenue Cross -Town Connector /Interchange Project described in Exhibit A attached to the Agreement and incorporated herein by reference, the Vintage Chateau II Senior Apartment Project described in Exhibit B attached to the Agreement and incorporated herein by reference, and the Staffing and Administrative Expenses described in Exhibit C attached to the Agreement and incorporated herein by reference, has no potential for physical effects on the environment and does not approve individual entitlements for any of the Projects described herein, and this action is therefore exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), 14 California Code of Regulations (CEQA Guidelines) Section 15061(b)(3); and, WHEREAS, the Auto Center Drive Project, as described in Exhibit A to the Agreement, is also categorically exempt from review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Sections 15303(d) and/or 15304(b) and /or 15304(h); and, WHEREAS, the environmental effects of the Old Redwood Highway Interchange Project described in Exhibit A to the Agreement were evaluated in the EIR for the Highway 101 HOV Lane Widening and Improvements Project, Old Redwood Highway to Rohnert Park Expressway, SCH #2003062100, for which an EIR was approved on October 23, 2007 and a Caltrans/NEPA Notice of Determination issued on October 29, 2007, and require no further envirorunental review, because no substantial changes are proposed for this Project and no substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which this Project is being undertaken since the EIR was approved, and there is no new information which was not known and could not have been known relating to this Project at the time the EIR was approved. A copy of the EIR is available at www.dot.ca.gov /dist4 /envdocs.htm; and, WHEREAS, the environmental effects of the 101 /East Washington Interchange Project described in Exhibit A to the Agreement were previously reviewed in full in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, U.S. Route 101 /East Washington Street Interchange, SCH #2007112073, for which a Caltrans/NEPA Determination was made on March 10, 2008. The Project requires no further environmental review because no substantial changes are proposed for this Project and no substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which this Project is being undertaken since the Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted, and there is no new information which was not known and could not have been known relating to this Project at the time the Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted. A copy of the EIR is available at www.dot.ca.gov /dist4 /envdocs.htm; and, Resolution No. 2011 -016 N.C.S. Page 2 WHEREAS, the environmental effects of the Caulfield Railroad Crossing Project described in Exhibit A to the Agreement were previously reviewed in the Environmental Impact Report for the Central Petaluma Specific Plan (CPSP) SCH #2002112039, which was approved prior to adoption of the CPSP, and for which a notice of determination was issued by the City on June 30, 2003. The Project requires no further environmental review because no substantial changes are proposed for this Project and no substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which this Project is being undertaken since the EIR was certified was adopted, and there is no new information which was not known and could not have been known relating to this Project at the time the EIR was certified. A copy of the EIR is available at the City of Petaluma, Planning Department, 11 English Street, Petaluma, CA; and, WHEREAS, the environmental effects of the interchange portion of the Rainier Avenue Cross -town Connector /Interchange ( "Rainier ") Project described in Exhibit A to the Agreement were previously reviewed in full in the EIR/EIS for the U.S. Highway 101 MSN C -2 Widening Project, SCH #2001042115, for which a Caltrans Notice of Determination issued on July 27, 2009, and a Record of Decision for NEPA was filed on October 29, 2010. The interchange portion of the Project requires no further environmental review because no substantial changes are proposed for the interchange portion of the Project and no substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the interchange portion of the Project is being undertaken since the EIR/EIS was approved, and there is no new information which was not known and could not have been known relating to the interchange portion of the Project at the time the EIR/EIS was approved. A copy of the EIR is available at www .dot.ca.gov /dist4 /envdocs.htm; and, WHEREAS, the environmental effects of the River Trail — Washington to Lakeville Project described in Exhibit A to the Agreement were evaluated in a Mitigated Negative Declaration approved by the City for which a Notice of Determination was issued on May 16, 2005 and require no further environmental review, because no substantial changes are proposed for this Project and no substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which this Project is being undertaken since the Mitigated Negative Declaration was approved and there is no new information which was not known and could not have been known relating to this Project at the time the Mitigated Negative Declaration was approved. A copy of the Mitigated Negative Declaration is available at the City of Petaluma, Department of Public Works, l l English Street, Petaluma, CA; and, WHEREAS, the environmental effects of the Logan Place Senior Apartment Project, APN # 019 - 202 -013, described in Exhibit B to the Agreement were previously reviewed in a Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted by the City on May 18, 2009. The Project requires no further environmental review because no substantial changes are proposed for this Project and no substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which this Project is being undertaken since the Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted, and there is no new information which was not known and could not have been known relating to this Project at the time the Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted. A copy of the Mitigated Negative Declaration is available at the City of Petaluma, Planning Department, 1 I English Street, Petaluma, CA; and, WHEREAS, the Staff Report accompanying this Resolution, the Agreement, the Redevelopment Plan, and the Implementation Plan provide additional information upon which the findings and actions set forth in this Resolution are based; and, Resolution No. 2011 -016 N.C.S. Page 3 WHEREAS, the expenditure of tax increment funds for the publicly owned improvements identified in the Agreement will be of benefit to the Project Areas by helping to eliminate blight within the Project Areas or providing housing to low -or moderate - income persons; and, WHEREAS, the expenditure of tax increment funds for the publicly -owned improvements is consistent with the Implementation Plan adopted by the Agency pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33490, in that it will further the goals and objectives of the Redevelopment Plan, improve the appearance of the Project Areas, eliminate blight, improve access to businesses in the Project Areas, and support economic development; and, WHEREAS, the activities and improvements proposed to be funded pursuant to the Agreement are provided for in the Redevelopment Plan, and the expenditure of tax increment funds for such improvements is consistent with the Implementation Plan adopted by the Agency pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33490; and, WHEREAS, the publicly -owned improvements proposed to be funded pursuant to the Agreement will not generate cash flow to the City or Agency, and therefore cannot support debt service; the City has no unrestricted general fund revenue available for such purposes without a reduction in vital community services; and the City does not have and cannot reasonably obtain revenue available for such purposes, and therefore no other reasonable means of financing the activities and improvements exists. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PETALUMA that it hereby: Finds based upon the foregoing recitals and the evidence in the record, including, in particular and without limitation the evidence provided in the Staff Report accompanying this Resolution, dated January 31, 2011, that: (i) the expenditure of tax increment funds for the publicly -owned improvements identified in the Agreement will be of benefit to the Project Areas by helping to eliminate blight within the Project Areas or providing housing for low- or moderate- income persons, (ii) no other reasonable means of financing such improvements is reasonably available, and (iii) payment for such improvements is consistent with the Implementation Plan adopted in connection with the Redevelopment Plan. 2. Approves the Agency's expenditure of tax increment funds in the amounts and for the purposes specified in the Agreement. Approves the actions to be undertaken and the services to be provided by the City as specified in the Agreement. 4. Authorizes the Mayor to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City substantially in the form of the Cooperative Agreement attached hereto and to undertake such actions and to execute such additional instruments as may be necessary or desirable in order to carry out the intent of this Resolution. Resolution No. 2011 -016 N.C.S. Page 4 5. Declares that if any provision, sentence, clause, section or part of this Resolution is found to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid, such finding shall affect only such provision, sentence, clause, section or part, and shall not affect or impair any of the remaining parts. Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City. REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the Vye to Council of the City of Petaluma at a Special meeting on the 31 day of January, 2011, by the following vote: City Att i AYES: Albertson, Barrett, Mayor Glass, Harris, Vice Mayor Healy, Renee NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None 4f A ATTEST: c ��� �'J� Deputy City Clerk Mayor Resolution No. 2011 -016 N.C.S. Page 5 ATTACHMENT TO RESOLUTION 2011 -016 N.C.S. CONTRACT NO. 2011 -016 COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE PETALUMA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION AND THE CITY OF PETALUMA This Cooperative Agreement (this "Agreement ") is entered into effective as of January 31, 2011 ( "Effective Date ") by and between the Petaluma Community Development Commission, a public body, corporate and politic ( "Agency ") and the City of Petaluma, a municipal corporation ( "City "). The Agency and the City are hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Parties." RECITALS A. Pursuant to authority granted under Community Redevelopment Law (California Health and Safety Code Section 33000 et seq.) ( "CRL"), the Agency has responsibility to implement the redevelopment plan for the Central Business District Project Area and the Petaluma Community Development Project Area (the "Project Areas ") established by the Redevelopment Plan adopted for the Project Area pursuant to Ordinance No. 1221, adopted on September 27, 1976; Ordinance No. 1725, adopted on June 13, 1988; and Ordinance No. 2116, adopted on July 18, 2001 (as subsequently amended, hereafter the "Redevelopment Plan "). B. Pursuant to Section 33220 of the CRL, any public body is authorized to enter into an agreement with the Agency for the purpose of aiding and cooperating in the planning, undertaking, construction, or operation of redevelopment projects located within the jurisdiction in which such public body is authorized to act, upon the terms and with or without consideration as such public body determines. C. Pursuant to Section 33126(b) of the CRL, the Agency may enter into a contract with any other public agency pursuant to which such public agency furnishes necessary staff services associated with or required by redevelopment. D. Pursuant to Section 33445 of the CRL, the Agency may, with the consent of the City, pay for all or a portion of the cost of the land for, and the cost of construction of, any building, facility, structure, or other improvements that are publicly owned and located within or contiguous to the Project Areas if the City Council finds that: (1) The acquisition of the land or the installation or construction of the buildings, facilities, structures, or other improvements that are publicly owned are of benefit to the Project Areas by helping to eliminate blight within the Project Areas or providing housing for low- or moderate - income persons; (2) No other reasonable means of financing the acquisition of the land or the installation or construction of the buildings, facilities, structures, or other improvements that are publicly owned, are available to the community; and (4) The payment of funds for the acquisition of land or the cost of buildings, facilities, structures, or other improvements that are publicly owned is consistent with the implementation plan adopted pursuant to CRL Section 33490. E. On the basis of the information and evidence presented to the City Council and the governing board of the Agency and provided in the staff report and other materials accompanying the resolutions approving this Agreement, the City Council and the governing board of the Agency have adopted the findings described in Recital D with respect to the public improvements to be funded by the Agency pursuant to this Agreement. Resolution No. 2011 -016 N.C.S. Page 6 F. The Parties desire to enter into this Agreement to set forth activities, services, and facilities that the City will undertake or make available to the Agency in furtherance of the redevelopment of the Project Areas, and to provide that the Agency will pay for or reimburse the City for actions undertaken and costs and expenses incurred for and on behalf of the Agency or otherwise in furtherance of the redevelopment of the Project Areas. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, conditions and promises herein contained, the Parties hereby agree as follows. 1. Term. The term of this Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date, and shall continue in effect until the expiration date of the Redevelopment Plan as in effect on the Effective Date of this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Parties agree that if and to the extent any payment obligation incurred by the Agency pursuant to this Agreement may extend beyond the term during which the Agency is authorized to undertake activities pursuant to state law, such obligations shall be paid from any resources available to Agency or its successor in interest (subject to Section 6 below), including without limitation, tax increment revenue available to the Agency or its successor pursuant to Article XVI, Section 16 of the California Constitution and CRL Section 33670, the proceeds of bonds or other indebtedness heretofore or hereafter issued by the Agency (subject to applicable limitations imposed by federal law and the applicable bond indenture and related documents), reserve funds (to the extent not otherwise legally obligated), lease revenues, interest, and proceeds from the sale of land or other assets. 2. Agency to Pay for Public Improvements. The Agency agrees to pay to the City the amounts set forth in Exhibit A for the cost of construction of the public improvements therein identified and in accordance with the schedule set forth therein, from all available sources, including bond proceeds on hand or to be received by the Agency in the future. In the event that the Agency is unable to issue bonds, the City agrees to enter into financing agreements as necessary to complete the projects identified in Exhibit A on behalf of the Agency, to be repaid by the Agency pursuant to Section 5 herein. 3. Agency to Provide Funds for Low and Moderate - Income Housing. The Agency agrees to pay to the City the amounts set forth in Exhibit B in accordance with the schedule set forth therein for the purpose of increasing, improving and preserving the supply of low- and moderate- income housing within the City. The Agency agrees to pay to the City all funds within its Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund not previously obligated by Agency pursuant to the Community Redevelopment Law or otherwise, for the purpose of increasing, improving and preserving the supply of low -and moderate- income housing within the City, to be utilized for all the costs associated with the affordable housing program, including salaries of housing staff working to produce Low and Moderate Income Housing. 4. City to Provide Services In support of the redevelopment of the Project Areas, the City agrees to provide the staffing and other services described in the attached Exhibit C . Agency agrees to pay City for the cost of such staffing and other services in the amounts and in accordance with the schedule described in the attached Exhibit C . 5. Indebtedness The obligations of the Agency to make payment to City pursuant to this Agreement shall constitute an indebtedness of the Agency within the meaning of Article XVI, Section 16 of the California Constitution and CRL Section 33670, and shall be payable from tax increment paid to the Agency pursuant to Article XVI, Section 16 of the California Constitution and CRL Section 33670 or from any other source legally available to the Agency for such payment, and shall constitute an indebtedness of the Agency until paid in full. The Agency shall include its obligations to the City under this Agreement as an indebtedness on the Agency's statement of indebtedness filed with the County Auditor pursuant to CRL Section 33675. Resolution No. 2011 -016 N.C.S. Page 7 6. Subordination. The obligations of the Agency to make payments to City pursuant to this Agreement shall be subordinate to any obligation of the Agency to pay debt service on bonds heretofore or hereafter issued by the Agency and to pay any other contractual indebtedness of the Agency incurred prior to the date of this Agreement. 7. Time for Agency Payment The Agency shall use its available funds to make all payments to the City required by this Agreement, not later than ten (10) days after the Effective Date. 8. Project Approvals; Environmental Review This Agreement is not intended to limit in any manner the discretion of City of the agency, as applicable, in connection with the issuance of approvals and entitlements for the projects described in this Agreement, including without limitation, the undertaking and completion of any required environmental review pursuant to CEQA and NEPA, as applicable, and the review and approval of plans and specifications. Prior to approving any of the projects described herein, the City acting as lead agency or co -lead agency, shall complete any environmental review required under CEQA or NEPA. 9. Severability If any term, provision, covenant, or condition set forth in this Agreement, including without limitation the exhibits hereto, is held by the final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions, covenants, and conditions shall continue in full force and effect to the extent that the basic intent of the Parties as expressed herein can be accomplished. In addition, the Parties shall cooperate in good faith in an effort to amend or modify this Agreement in a manner such that the purpose of any invalidated or voided provision, covenant, or condition can be accomplished to the maximum extent legally permissible. 10. No Third -Party Beneficiaries; Assignments. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to create any third -party beneficiaries to the Agreement, and no person or entity other than the Agency and the City, and the permitted successors and assigns of either of them, shall be authorized to enforce the provisions of this Agreement. 11. Further Assurances. Each Party agrees to execute, acknowledge and deliver all additional documents and instruments, and to take such other actions as may be reasonably necessary to carry out the intent of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. 12. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 13. Counterparts This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which shall constitute but one and the same instrument. 14. Amendments. This Agreement may be modified or amended, in whole or in part, only by an instrument in writing, executed by the Parties. 15. Recitals The Recitals set forth above are hereby incorporated into this Agreement as though fully set herein. 16. Exhibits. Exhibits A , B and C attached hereto are hereby incorporated into this Agreement by reference. Resolution No. 2011 -016 N.C.S. Page 8 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above. CITY: CITY OF PETALUMA, a m7 ration By: David Glass, Mayor ATTEST: By: Claire Cooper, CMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Eric Danly, City Attorney AGENCY: PETALUMA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION, a public body, corporate and politic By: ATTEST: By: John C. Brown, Executive Director Claire Cooper, CMC, Agency Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Eric Danly, Agency Counsel Resolution No. 2011 -016 N.C.S. Page 9 EXHIBIT A TO AGREEMENT Old Redwood Highway Interchange Project Location - Highway 101 and Old Redwood Highway Project Description -This project upgrades the Old Redwood Highway 101 interchange to meet current standards and future traffic requirements. The proposed interchange includes ramp widening and reconfiguration, traffic operations system improvements, over - crossing structure widening to six lanes, including bicycle lanes and enhanced signalization improvements at the intersections. It is to be constructed independently of the Central B portion of the proposed future widening on US 101, and will provide both safety and congestion relief - enhancements. The project has $1 OM Measure M funds allocation, with the City /local funds paying for the remaining $20.885M costs. Anticipated PCDC Project Cost: $ 899,000 2010-2011 $14,101,000 2011-2012 2. Auto Center Drive Extension Project Location - Auto Center Drive Project Description - This project extends Auto Center Drive from its current dead end to create a connection to Petaluma Boulevard North, near the Highway 101 interchange. Utility mains will be installed along with new roadway on existing right of way. Anticipated PCDC Project Cost: $1,172,000 2010-2011 3. 101 /East Washington Interchange Project Location - East Washington Street and Highway 101 Project Description - This project improves the East Washington Street Interchange with Highway 101 by adding a new northbound on -ramp and realigning the existing southbound on -ramp. Currently, project funding consists of SAFTLU $13.5M, demonstration funds $1 M, Measure M $2.9M, and the City $4M local funds toward project right -of -way acquisitions and construction of the East Washington Interchange, for total available funding of $21.4M. The estimated cost to design the MSN -C is $6.5M, for a total project cost of $28M. Anticipated PCDC Project Cost: $2,732,000 2010 - 2011/2011 -2012 4. Caulfield Railroad Crossing Project Location - Caulfield Lane and Hopper Street Project Description - Completion of a railroad crossing, the intersection improvements, and the closing of the existing railroad crossing at Hopper Street /Jefferson Street. Due to future expected rail use, the new location will improve safety and promote future development in the area. Anticipated PCDC Project Cost: $300,000 2010-2011 5. Rainier Avenue Cross -town Connector /Interchange Project Location - Rainier Avenue Project Description - This project provides a new interchange and cross -town roadway under - crossing of US 101. SCTA has agreed to incorporate the under- crossing structure as part of the US Resolution No. 2011 -016 N.C.S. Page 10 101 MSN C -2 widening project, which is currently in design. To ensure inclusion of the under - crossing structure into the MSN C -2 schedule, the interchange component and the under - crossing component are being studied as two separate, independent projects. As part of the work effort for the cross -town connector roadway portion of the project, a project study report /project report and environmental document must be completed. Anticipated PCDC Project Cost: $1,356,000 2010 -2011 $ 116,000 2011-2012 $7,000,000 2012 -2013 6. River Trail - Washington to Lakeville Project Location - various locations in PCD project area Project Description - This project implements a portion of the Petaluma River Access and Enhancement Plan from Lynch Creek (Near Lakeville Street) to Washington Street. The project will construct a multimodal path along the project limits and construct a pedestrian bridge over the Petaluma River to close a gap in this important pedestrian route. Anticipated PCDC Project Cost: $1,374,000 2011 -2012 $ 626,000 2013 -2014 7. Brownfields Program Location -with entire PCD and CBD project areas Project Description -The City has committed to a $200,000 match to a $1 Million Environment Protection Agency Revolving Loan Fund (RLF) Grant. The RLF works in conjunction with several EPA funded assessment grants to provide financial and technical assistance to property owners for assessment and clean -up of Brownfields within the redevelopment area. Anticipated PCDC Project Cost: $200,000 2010 -2016 8. Economic Development /Site Development Location: Throughout PCD and CBD project areas Project Description: The goal of economic development activities is to develop and promote incentives that address the specific needs of existing businesses and enhance the City's ability to attract new businesses and visitors. Anticipated PCDC Project Cost: $6,000,000 2010 -2016 Resolution No. 2011 -016 N.C.S. Page 11 EXHIBIT B TO AGREEMENT Affordable Housing Projects: 1. Vintage Chateau II Senior Apartments Location: 325 North McDowell Blvd., Petaluma APN #007 - 350 -013 Project Description: Construction of 68 affordable rental units for seniors to be built on approximately 1.67 acres by a nonprofit developer in the Petaluma Community Development Project Area of Petaluma's redevelopment agency. This project will be funded using the California Tax Credit Allocation program. Project Cost: Total project cost is $15,900,000. $4,500,000 has been committed by the Petaluma Community Development Commission of which $2,500,000 of the Agency funds has been spent on site acquisition. Documentation: This project has all its land use approvals and is applying for 4% tax credit bonds in March of 2011. Construction to begin in July of 2011. Future Anticipated PCDC Project Cost: $2,000,000 2010-2011 Logan Place Apartments Location: 1200 Petaluma Blvd. North, Petaluma APN #019- 202 -013 Project Description: Construction of 66 affordable multifamily rental units on approximately 2.61 acres by a nonprofit developer in the Petaluma Community Development Project Area of Petaluma's redevelopment agency. This project has been approved for HOME and MHP funds of approximately $10,000,000. Project Cost: Total project cost is $25,600,000. $5,150,000 has been committed by Petaluma's Redevelopment Agency in support of this development. Approximately $3,450,000 of Agency funds has been spent on site acquisition and pre - development costs. The balance of $1,700,000 will be spent over the next two years during construction. Documentation: This project has all its land use approvals and is applying for 4% fax credit bonds in June of 2011. Construction to begin in September of 2011. Future Anticipated PCDC Project Cost: $ 400,000 2011-2012 $ 1,300,000 2012 -2013 Affordable Housing Programs: Redevelopment funds can be used for the purpose of increasing, improving and preserving the supply of low -and moderate - income housing within the City and for all the costs associated with the affordable housing program. These programs are listed below along with the nonprofit agency that partners with the City of Petaluma. 1. Rental Assistance Program - Petaluma People Services Center 2. Transitional Housing Program - Salvation Army 3. Transitional Housing Program - Committee on the Shelterless 4. Family Transitional Housing - Committee on the Shelterless 5. Fair Housing - Landlord and Tenant Mediation - Petaluma People Services Center Resolution No. 2011 -016 N.C.S. Page 12 6. Mobile Home Rent Control - City of Petaluma 7. Rehab of low- income families and seniors - Rebuilding Together Anticipated Housing Program Cost: $1,026,400 2010-2011 $5,132,000 2011-2016 Resolution No. 2011-016 N.C.S. Page 13 EXHIBIT C TO AGREEMENT Staffing and Administrative Expenses In support of the redevelopment Petaluma's projects areas, the City agrees to provide the staffing and other services by which the Agency agrees to pay City for the cost of such staffing and other services as listed below. Table 1 will be delivered by the City Manager's Office, Public Works, and Finance Department staff persons for project management, construction management, environmental review, survey, financial accounting and project reporting. The expenses of administering the Agency Programs and Projects are payable to the City on an annual basis. Table 1 - Aaencv Administration Annual Costs 2011-2016 2011 -2012 2012 -2013 2013 -2014 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 1,198,500 1,198,500 1,150,000 1,150,000 1,150,000 Affordable Housing Programs and Projects Administrative Expenses City staff will provide administration, fiscal reporting, project management, marketing and grant administration services for a wide range of affordable housing programs and projects. The expenses of administering the Affordable Housing Programs and Projects are payable to the City on an annual basis. Table 2 - Affordable Housinq program Administration Annual Costs 2011-2016 2011 -2012 2012 -2013 2013 -2014 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 375,000 375,000 375,000 375,000 375,000 :1.11 Resolution No. 2011 -016 N.C.S. Page 14