HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Report 1.A 11/14/2016Act in the Petaluma Valley Basin
tr Fi114f&VI- "Irl RvatMol
!,00 7�7' �,
X,
^ Prashwater" Fietervoit �"" ��"`
Treatment Plant,.
i3tion
il I milik, W�Aik pams folim
KAft
u
imev%ta 10"'ll
Imple J
A
GROUN DWAX
SUSTAINAB '
Became law on
1/1/2015
Requires groundwater
basins to be
sustainability managed
Applies statewide to
medium and high
priority basins
In Sonoma County,
affects Santa Rosa
Plain, Sonoma Valley,
and Petaluma Valley
Basins
7
Please Note: Groundwater Basin and Management Program Area
boundaries are approximate. This map is for Illustration purposes only.
Sonia Ro{ a Phil)
0 110 11114 V, t I I, -Y
Gioundwater Basin
',
vot'11111110 valloy
61oundwA'I OwAn
)'111(0 RO"O Hain
Managetnent Program Area
';(monla Valley
Kmaqonwnt flmqiom Awi
Please Note: Groundwater Basin and Management Program Area
boundaries are approximate. This map is for Illustration purposes only.
California last western state to regulate groundwater
Statewide problem
�Over-draftecl basins have led to
Dropping
intrusionLoss of groundwater storage
Land subsidence
Saltwater
impactDegradation of groundwater quality
Negative ".
��.A sustainable groundwater basin will address thes@
impacts SUSTAINABLE GRQUNDWAT
md Steps to Groundwater SustainabilitNi.
Aequire
Form Develop Achieve
Groundwater Groundwater Sustainabi[ity
S,ustainabitity Sustainability 20 years after
Agency Plan , adoption of
June 30, 2017 January 31, 2022 plaO
DWR may grant up to two, five-year extensions on implementation Xl'
SUSTAINABLE GROUNDWAT
upon showing of good cause and progress
kiss'. GeOlOgIcal
Survey G
roundwater Study
.
171120scheduled for completion Fa
o
COMO * ng nevv data �geol I
Collect' I-ty and streaMflO\Ivs)
goundwater
Is DeveloP ng Ical foundation for de\jelOping
* 11 form
.
at', plan (GSP)
\N I e r Susta-nabl MY
GVkOUt4DNNAGrOundvvat 0 LE
i�
Groundwater Sustainability
Agencies
Local agency or combinationof !agencies
"'Local agency" is any public agency that has responsibilities
for at leasonet i ';
• Supplies water
•
i water
Manags
• Controls , i.
Counties• 1 "unmanaged"
areas
If the County declines , the State will step I
to manage the in
• Can be more than one GSA in basin
wtv Agencies
aroundwater Sustainab Y
have authOrfty
6 \e \
Regis -L'' w. ing requirement
Set well SPac - reporting
Require extraction
Regulate extractions
implement capital projects
Assess fees to cover costs
a SrAp4AB GROUND-Vv��,T,
SU
0 'Oft
0"'har ieb
terestc
,�►
h, ..WIN
.. m
• •
al uses and
•
nterestS Of all benef
GSA Must •
e •
users Of groundwater 1
Local Landowners
to ries Groundwater Communities
X11 ca Disadvantaged
Users
Business
Agriculture
Domestic Well
Users Federal Govern
Well operators and nvironment l Uses
Municipal
public
Waterstems Surface Water Users if conn
ection
ican -Tribes between surface and roun
Native Amer
water)
county
Land S e � susTAlN��LE GRau�aw��r
tannin Departments %
General GSA Governance 0,'#
ns i de red b
CounbrA
Y the
*ne GSA with one Plan per Basin (Option Recommended by Workgroup)
• Most direct, simplest form of representation
• Possible funding competition between basins
• Less efficient administration & regional issues
Centralized: One countywide GSA (Option Not Pursued)
• Coordinate regional issues (e.g., land use, well permitting, data)
• Maximize administration efficiencies, reduce competition among basins
Possibly cumbersome GSA board representation
Broad policies to basin -specific unique issues
I I I I III ��I I F 11�q
lo
(1) The Act allows for multiple GSAs with 1 GSP developed cooperatively; or multiple
GSAs with multiple GSP"s developed under a formal ""coordination agreement"' between
GSAs.
SUSTAINABLE GROUND
09tion Develogeu tjy %.,%%.7 - r
OU I Z)IL.)L. %,® 1-11 -1
Requires a Separate Rural GSA foBasin
limits pa tLIonP anV GSA lting fee
No City.-- S, including the resu
by other
Accept GSP created ent gractices and regulations
structure, managern P4 MNA�If
Qp SUSTAINABLEGVto"
Petaluma Valley Basin
a Encompasses about 94 of the 146
square miles of the Petaluma River
Watershed
1-59
Basin IDI Basin/Sutibas
Medium Prio
Vett' Low Priority
1.50 1whown Fomation Ngh
Petaluma River Watershed
sir 2-1
Clty,of. Petaluma :1
Servi8eAr
ytik
ld
NOrth Bay
Water District
Sonoma Counts, Givundwater
Basins and Sub -basins
Unt'Od'.-Mg Petaluma Vatley
Basin IDI Basin/Sutibas
Medium Prio
Vett' Low Priority
1.50 1whown Fomation Ngh
Petaluma River Watershed
sir 2-1
Clty,of. Petaluma :1
Servi8eAr
ytik
ld
NOrth Bay
Water District
Sonoma Counts, Givundwater
Basins and Sub -basins
Unt'Od'.-Mg Petaluma Vatley
Forming a Groundvvater Sustainability Agency
A Or
MEMO
M M ERNA, IVE
ALI
0
13
Vlley Basin -wide GSA
•
PetalumaCity of
Sonoma County # i
•
ency
Sonoma Resource Conservation
0 les for Developeng
PrincIP A- up
ation and successful water
Build upon existing cooper na county
.
management efforts n sonor
11 y
principles
local management
1[
0 Reinforce® f
hes
ly shared ugh advisory
0 Share resources and 0 identTYts should be equitab hro
0 Cos sty stakeholders t
.
committees nsparent outreach
0 Conduct robust and tra "'° LE GROUND"
,
'' SUSiA1N�
B
it iv-iie emmy
tIM"JI'l- '6
GSA Membersnipe tative from 5
s one represen
GSA BOarO'-'
I ® ed board/council member
Representat On'
us be elected or appoint
primary.• M d/Appointed or executive staff
Alternate: Electe er entitY out of 5
vote
Ing. One \jote p vote of 3
utine business simple majority for approval of critical items
Ro aiority 4 out of 5 required / required for super -
Super -M of both the City and the Count\
Affirmative
ative vote er to any critical issue.
majority items county an effective veto PO including amendments, annual
- Gives City Or adoption of bylaws, GSP ees, and appointment of
critical items: a is assessment of rates and f
budget, regulatiof Y surer.
a fiscal agent and trea akeholder inpUt
reated f Or st DW
STAINABLE GROUN AIT
SU
Sory body" C tion
A dvil still Under considera
vund-Ing/staff'ng
I
a
TransparencYo ru"'
meetings 8 protocols to be established
gA�T
SUSTAINOU GR�O"IDW
0 ea
Membership
ers, one aPPOin'teu
4
al Water. -User
1r►
MM
ln'ed bY
members r:!!:
C
i
Rept e
SiJSiAtNA13 C,ROUidC)WA
.0
"GAP" COStI
t
subcommitteeins
formedrepresenting
Funding
a
i
GSP r
i r &operations
ism
rangeDevelopment of revenue mechan
is no precedence
Wide
estimates
informationatEstimates compare well with estimates
0 Estimates will continue to be refined as new
becomes available i-, ntinn of a�
reduce costs
a
Estimated Annual GSA Start -Up Costs
Options to Fund Start -Up Costs
Funding Mechanisms
• Contributions from GSA -eligible entities
• Loan/finance (Staff proposal)
FinandnRO ions
pf-,.--
• Loans from GSA -eligible entities per negotiated allocation
• Finance from third party (e.g. County Treasurer)
• Need to "backstop" obligation in case of default by GS
• Allocation of "backstop" among GSA -eligible entities I
Decision -makers -
Boards and Councils of
GSA -eligible agencies
Public Input: Public
officials will consider
public input
How? Legal documents
will be developed in
Winter and Spring of
2017 for approval by
Boards and Councils
I MA
r-,-jtv-\Nj6e GSA Make -U",61
serves as G5A Duc"
city Counc' so be a GSA eligible entItY, however
SCWA may al
participation doubtTul nts a seven member
Council, as GSA boardy appOI
Advisory Committee Industrial well owners
commercial and 1I
ral and recreational well owners
Agricultu
Cityys well field operations
nental Interests
Environr
Economic development interests
'
ell interests
Idential W
Res
At large
0
CIty..\Njde GSA Funcling
NEXUS between operation of a
11creates ply strategy
Co u n co -riaCotyls water sup
0 -;
UITY-j a I tar
due
" I e of grounuv\,o A.-%IjunctIve uslonat-el yto con' d proport-de GSA share
■ Costs Of a C"'tY-WI
r classes and included in the C'tY s
by all custome
water rate analysis.
■ Compliant With the requirements of State
Proposition218.
edIF CouncilBijsiness plan to be Develop
pirects
So LE" RoUNDWA
STA 14AB G
operatlonal Considerations
®.-
a
a a
pate in Petaluma ) d, cye
Development ana ru" on and resource sharing as
a
a
a a a
a anformati
•
a
® pate in -wide GSA Alternative
a a a
described wan the Bass
tV outreach utilizing the
Include Robust un
COMM,,abi a
e ies°
city s
ng cap ia, workshops, and
a ® a
Websites, social
a
customer
s a
s a
a
ng services from the countywide GSA!s
a
purcha i b—commIttee
outreach Su
a
and media placements.
SUSTAINABLE 'MOUNp1 �4
Formation Steps
' • • • • �r •: ..
+Develop description of how interests of all beneficial
uses • • users of •;, • be considered
the development and operation of • •'
development and implementation of the GSR
''Publishpublic i '` of • •
publici
resolutionAdopt i
Adopt by-laws, ordinances,Authorities
SUSTAINABLE-�>- This would need to begin by March 2017
,
no]
icipation
a e
tantial
places control \Ivith the basin-\Ni6e GSP Or vjv
agencies mens of a fee and rate structure
Developme of roan mate regulations
Imposition cant influence n6 charges With
city would ha\/e no I rograMS, controls a
6 up \Nith nevv P Oney
Could en oeS not agree nd \Nell O\IvnefS M Osts Of
Which it d City residents a pay for the C
not sa\/e the ioected to
Does Id still be e%1-
ause they \NOL1 COLnty-\Nide GSA.
beC 13,sin-ntat'
\Nide or it
the vIt P\epreseOn
II -Taxation WIL !able OP On to STAIN G - V t ! OU� �'D, WIT
dered a
N Ot consi
*10%
uornments and Questions
/������/\®� /\..� \