Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 2017-052 N.C.S. 04/03/2017Resolution No. 2017 -052 N.C.S. of the City of Petaluma, California APPROVING A REQUEST TO THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION FOR THE ALLOCATION OF FISCAL YEAR 2017 -2018 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT ARTICLE 3 PEDESTRIANBICYCLE PROJECT FUNDING WHEREAS, Article 3 of the Transportation Development Act (TDA), Public Utilities Code (PUC) Section 99200 et seq., authorizes the submission of claims to a regional transportation planning agency for the funding of projects exclusively for the benefit and /or use of pedestrians and bicyclists; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), as the regional transportation planning agency for the San Francisco Bay region, has adopted MTC Resolution No. 4108, entitled "Transportation Development Act, Article 3, Pedestrian and Bicycle Projects," which delineates procedures and criteria for submission of requests for the allocation of "TDA Article 3" funding; and WHEREAS, MTC Resolution No. 4108 requires that requests for the allocation of TDA Article 3 funding be submitted as part of a single, countywide coordinated claim from each county in the San Francisco Bay region; and WHEREAS, the City of Petaluma desires to submit a request to MTC for the allocation of TDA Article 3 funds to support the projects described in Attachment B to this resolution, which are for the exclusive benefit and /or use of pedestrians and /or bicyclists. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Petaluma declares it is eligible to request an allocation of TDA Article 3 funds pursuant to Section 99234 of the Public Utilities Code, and furthermore, be it RESOLVED, that there is no pending or threatened litigation that might adversely affect the project or projects described in Attachment B to this resolution, or that might impair the ability of the City of Petaluma to carry out the project; and furthermore, be it RESOLVED, that the project has been reviewed by the Pedestrian and Bicycle Advisory Committee of City of Petaluma and furthermore, be it RESOLVED, that the City of Petaluma attests to the accuracy of and approves the statements in Attachment B to this resolution; and furthermore, be it Resolution No. 2017 -052 N.C.S. Page 1 RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution and its attachments, and any accompanying supporting materials shall be forwarded to the congestion management agency, countywide transportation planning agency, or county association of governments, as the case may be, of Sonoma County for submission to MTC as part of the countywide coordinated TDA Article 3 claim. Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City. REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the A proved ",jas to Council of the City of Petaluma at a Regular meeting on the 3`d day of April, 2017, form: by the following vote: city ttorney AYES: Albertson, Healy, Kearney, King, Miller NOES: None Resolution No. 2017 -052 N.C.S. Page 2 Attachment A to the Resolution Findings Page 1 of 1 1. That the City of Petaluma is not legally impeded from submitting a request to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for the allocation of Transportation Development Act (TDA) Article 3 funds, nor is the City of Petaluma legally impeded from undertaking the project(s) described in "Attachment B" of this resolution. 2. That the City of Petaluma has committed adequate staffing resources to complete the project(s) described in Attachment B. 3. A review of the project(s) described in Attachment B has resulted in the consideration of all pertinent matters, including those related to environmental and right -of -way permits and clearances, attendant to the successful completion of the project(s). 4. Issues attendant to securing environmental and right -of -way permits and clearances for the projects described in Attachment B have been reviewed and will be concluded in a manner and on a schedule that will not jeopardize the deadline for the use of the TDA funds being requested. 5. That the project(s) described in Attachment B comply with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA, Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et seq.). 6. That as portrayed in the budgetary description(s) of the project(s) it! Attachment B, the sources of funding other than TDA are assured and adequate for completion of the project(s). 7. That the projects) described in Attachment B are for capital construction and /or design engineering; and /or for the maintenance of a Class I bikeway which is closed to motorized traffic; and/or for the purposes of restriping Class II bicycle lanes; and/or for the development or support of a bicycle safety education program; and /or for the development of a comprehensive bicycle and /or pedestrian facilities plan, and an allocation of TDA Article 3 funding for such a plan has not been received by the City of Petaluma within the prior five fiscal years. 8. That the project(s) described in Attachment B is included in a locally approved bicycle, pedestrian, transit, multimodal, complete streets, or other relevant plan. 9. That any project described in Attachment B that is a bikeway meets the mandatory minimum safety design criteria published in Chapter 1000 of the California Highway Design Manual. 10. That the project(s) described in Attachment B will be completed before the funds expire. 11. That the City of Petaluma agrees to maintain, or provide for the maintenance of, the project(s) and facilities described in Attachment B, for the benefit of and use by the public. Resolution No. 2017 -052 N.C.S. Page 3 Attachment B to the Resolution Resolution No. T.B.D page 1 of 1 TDA Article 3 Project Application Form Fiscal Year of this Claim:2017 -2018 Applicant: City of Petaluma Contact person: Larry Zimmer Mailinq Address: 11 English Street Petaluma, CA 94952 E -Mail Address: Izimmer(o)ci.petaluma.ca.us Telephone: 707 - 776 -3674 Secondary Contact (in event primary not available) Jeff Stutsman E -Mail Address: jstutsman(a ci. petal uma. ca. us Telephone: 707 - 776 -3673 Short Title Description of Project: Upgrade pedestrian and bicycle beacons, signage and striping at Crystal Lane Roundabout and Edith Street at East Washington Street Amount of claim: $79,283 Functional Description of Project: Construct pedestrian and bicycle traffic warning devices at the Crystal Lane Roundabout and at Edith Street at East Washington Street. Work will include, in general of constructing new pole foundations installing rectangular rapid flashing beacons electrical work traffic control striping, pavement marking and Financial Plan: List the project elements for which TDA funding is being requested (e.g., planning, engineering, and construction, contingency). Use the table below to show the project budget for the phase being funded or total project. Include prior and proposed future funding of the project, Planning funds may only be used for comprehensive bicycle and pedestrian plans. Project level planning is not an eligible use of TDA Article 3. Project Elements: Construction and contingency Fundin Source All Prior FYs Application FY Next FY Following FYs Totals TDA Article 3 $79,283 Has this project previously received TDA Article 3 funding? If "YES," provide an explanation on a separate page. No $79,283 list all other sources: Yes Highway Design Manual? (Available on the internet via: http: / /www,dot,ca.gov). D. 1. Yes project was reviewed by the BAC:3/1/17 PBAC letter attached E. 2. No, but will be evidenced by the dated stamping of the document by the county clerk or county recorder? (Required only for projects that in April 2017 3. F. Will the project be completed before the allocation expires? Enter the anticipated completion date of project (month and Yes 4. G. Have provisions been made by the claimant to maintain the project or facility, or has the claimant arranged for such Yes Totals $79,283 $79,283 Project Eligibility: YES ? /NO? A. Has the project been approved by the claimant's governing body? (If "NO," provide the approximate date approval is No, 4/3/17 anticipated). B. Has this project previously received TDA Article 3 funding? If "YES," provide an explanation on a separate page. No C. For "bikeways," does the project meet Caltrans minimum safety design criteria pursuant to Chapter 1000 of the California Yes Highway Design Manual? (Available on the internet via: http: / /www,dot,ca.gov). D. Has the project been reviewed by a Bicycle Advisory Committee (BAC)? (If "NO," provide an explanation). Enter date the Yes project was reviewed by the BAC:3/1/17 PBAC letter attached E. Has the public availability of the environmental compliance documentation for the project (pursuant to CEQA) been No, but will be evidenced by the dated stamping of the document by the county clerk or county recorder? (Required only for projects that in April 2017 include construction). F. Will the project be completed before the allocation expires? Enter the anticipated completion date of project (month and Yes year) March 2018 G. Have provisions been made by the claimant to maintain the project or facility, or has the claimant arranged for such Yes maintenance by another agency? (If an agency other than the Claimant is to maintain the facility provide its name: Resolution No. 2017 -052 N.C.S. Page 4 0 161 0 0 A B C D E E G I H 50 0 25 50 3O' ; ` xk EDITH STREET AT EAST WASHINGTON ST PLAN SCALE: 1" = 50' A R (, DET, CRYSTAL LANE ROUNDABOUT - PLAN SCALE: 1" = 50' (N) SOLAR PANEL C (N) 36 "06" W11 -2 (N) TAPCO XL2 (SOLAR) WITH CONTROLLER o � � (N) 24"X12" W16 -P EX TYPE 1 -B TO BE REUSED II (N) BULLDOG PUSH BUTTON 7' MIN 7' MIN II 3' -4 "I 1 3._4" II d a ° d ° RRFB SOLAR DETAIL/' ETAI 2 RRFB 110V n F F (; H 1 W m W Z Z U, Y Q W K S PROJECT NO. cxxxxxXXX 2 rn Q a w o� F F- a �0 Uo 3LL Y Q � 0 wN W ad 3 o v '� � m� m °- o a H g° H Z N V N I � = 4 I- H z W W W W � �!:::W � w w H Q Q z1-- I- O W pZ) zU 5 Q =z °z Q Q =Q�W ~ w cf) 0 W Q W z W Z J � J Q I— I ) U) U 6 U SHEET C1 01 OF 01 CONSTRUCTION NOTES (N) 36 "x36" W11 -2 �1 REMOVE EXISTING POLE AND FOUNDATION REMOVE EXISTING POLE AND FOUNDATION AND INSTALL TAPCO RRFB -XL2 110VAC SIGN PER DETAIL 2 �N�T TAPCO �R110VAC) ❑3 2 "C, 2 #14(RRFB) —(N) 24"X12" W16 -P (N) TYPE 1 -B POLE AND NOT USED FOUNDATION. NEW POLE FOUNDATION SHALL BE INSTALLED INSTALL NEW TAPCO RRFB CONTROLLER 4FT FROM FACE OF CURB TO FACE OF POLE (N) BULLDOG a 2- GRIND AND OVERLAY (2' WIDE) PUSH BUTTON 0 INSTALL TAPCO RRFB -XL2 (SOLAR) WITH CONTROLLER ON EXISTING POLE WITH BULL DOG PUSH BUTTON PER DETAIL 1. SALVAGE EXISTING SIGN II d a ° d ° RRFB SOLAR DETAIL/' ETAI 2 RRFB 110V n F F (; H 1 W m W Z Z U, Y Q W K S PROJECT NO. cxxxxxXXX 2 rn Q a w o� F F- a �0 Uo 3LL Y Q � 0 wN W ad 3 o v '� � m� m °- o a H g° H Z N V N I � = 4 I- H z W W W W � �!:::W � w w H Q Q z1-- I- O W pZ) zU 5 Q =z °z Q Q =Q�W ~ w cf) 0 W Q W z W Z J � J Q I— I ) U) U 6 U SHEET C1 01 OF 01 City of Petaluma Crosswalk Improvements at Crystal Lane Roundabout and Edith Street at East Washington Street Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost Item No. Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Total 1 Mobilization / Demobilization 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 2 Traffic Control 1 LS $7,000 $7,000 3 Traffic Control 1 LS $7,000 $7,000 4 2" Grind and Overlay (2' wide) 11 Tons $200 $2,200 5 Electrical a. RRFB Signs (120V) 4 Ea $6,384 $25,534 b. RRFB Signs (Solar) 4 Ea $4,234 $16,934 Sub Total $63,669 Contingency (15 %) $9,200 Construction Management 10% in House) $6,290 Project Total $79,159 Resolution No. 2017 -052 N.C.S. Page 6 David Glass Mayor Chris Albertson Teresa Barrett Mike Healy Gabe Kearney Dave King Kathy Miller Councilmembers Public Works & Utilities City Engineer 11 English Street Petaluma, CA 94952 Phone (707) 778 -4303 Environmental Services Ellis Creek Water Recycling Facility 3890 Cypress Drive Petaluma, CA 94954 Phone (707) 776 -3777 Fav: (707) 656 -4067 Parks & Facility Maintenance 840 Hopper A Exi. Petahnna, CA 94952 Phone (707) 778 -4303 Fax (707) 206 -6065 Transit Mvislon 555 X'' McDowell Blvd. Petahnna, CA 94954 Phone (707) 778 -4421 Utilities & Field Operations 202 N. McDowell Blvd Petahnna, CA 94954 Phone (707) 778 -4546 Fav (707) 206 -6034 E Mail. publicivorks@ cipetabona.ca.us c POST OriFICE BOX 61 PETALUMA, CA 94953 -0061 March 1, 2017 Sonoma County Transportation Authority 490 Mendocino Avenue, Suite 206 Santa Rosa, CA 95401 RE: Use of Transportation Development Act Article Three Funds for Pedestrian Crossing Improvement Project To Whom R May Concern: On March 1, 2017, the Petaluma Pedestrian and Bicycle Advisory Committee (PBAC) discussed using transportation development act, article three (TDA -3) funds for a proposed pedestrian safety improvement project at the existing roundabout intersection on Petaluma Boulevard South at Crystal Lane. The project consists of installing a new rapid rectangular flashing beacon crosswalk system on the Petaluma Boulevard South legs of the roundabout, replacing the existing, .failed in- ground lighted system. The crosswalk provides a connection for pedestrians from the nearby Quarry Heights Subdivision and other nearby residential areas, to an existing regional bus stop as well as other adjacent land uses. The committee supports the proposed project and voted at the March 1, 2017 PBAC meeting to recommend use of up to $79,283 of TDA -3 fiends, which is the curr4Petaluma fund balance, to complete this project. Chair c: File SACity EngineeringWraffic Engineering & Operations\Bike\Bike CommitteeWommunicationTBAC Recommendation Letter TDA3 PBS Roundabout Pedestrian Improvements.doe Resolution No. 2017 -052 N.C.S. Page 7 RETURN TO: City of Petaluma Public Works Department P.O. Box 61 Petaluma, CA 94953 NOTICE OF EXEMPTION TO: Sonoma County Clerk 2300 County Center Drive La Plaza, Building B, Suite 177 Santa Rosa, CA 95406 Proiect Title,: Crystal Lane and Edith Street Crosswalk Improvements Proiect Applicant: City of Petaluma Public Works and Utilities Department • z Proiect Location: Crystal Lane Roundabout and Edith Street at East Washington Street in the City of Petaluma, Sonoma County, CA Proiect Description: The project work generally consists of removing existing in ground lighting and installing new rectangular rapid flashing beacons (RRFB) at pedestrian crossing. The RRFB is comprised of a 7 foot poll, with a pedestrian crosswalk sign and controller beacon mounted on top. The RRFBs installed at Edith Lane will also have a solar panel atop. A push button at 3 -4 feet off the ground will trigger the flashing beacon to alert motor vehicles of pedestrians utilizing cross walks. Ancillary work includes a 2 inch grind and overlay within crosswalks where improvements will occur. EXEMPT STATUS: (CHECK ONE) •ticle 18:Section 21080;15260} Ministerial {Sec. 15268} Feasibility/Planning Study {Sec.15262} Emergency Project {See. 15269) General Rule {See. 15061 (b)(3)} Other: {Sec. } Categorical Exemptions {Article 19:Section 21084;153001 [x] Existing Facilities {Sec.15301} [ ] Replacement or Reconstruction {Sec.15302) [ ] Small Structures {Sec.15303} [ ] Minor Alterations {Sec.15304} [ ] Minor Subdivisions {Sec.15315} Reasons why protect is exempt: The project consists of installing upgraded cross walk features at existing roadway intersections where pedestrian crosswalks presently exist. All improvements will occur within the existing public right- of-way in previously disturbed areas. The project will repair the street surface and restore crosswalk striping and pavement markings. There is no expansion of use beyond what currently exists and there are no cumulative impacts, unusual circumstances or other factors that would make the exemption inapplicable. Therefore, this project is exempt under Section 15301 (c), maintenance to existing public streets and sidewalks. Lead Agency: City of Petaluma Public Works, 11 English Street, P.O. Box 61, Petal una, CA 94953 : Jeff Stutsman, Project Manager Phone (707) 776 -3673 1Z -1Z I Date Pursuant to Section 711.4(d)(2) of the Fish and Game Code, statutory and categorical exemptions are also exempt from Department of Fish and Wildlife filing fees. Resolution No. 2017 -052 N.C.S. Page 8