Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Report 5.A 07/17/2017DATE: July 17, 2017 Agenda Item #5.A TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council through City Manager d FROM: Da S.ASCE — Director, Public Works & Utilities Jason Ea anagement Analyst SUBJECT: Resolution Approving Two New Fees to Be Added to the City's Master Fee Schedule — Marina Liveaboard and Derelict Aircraft Fees RECOMMENDATION It is recommended the City Council adopt a Resolution Approving Two New Fees to be Added to the City's Master Fee Schedule — Marina Liveaboard and Derelict Aircraft Fees. BACKGROUND The Marina Liveaboard Fee was originally presented to the City Council in September 2015 as part of the Comprehensive User Fee update initiative, but was not implemented because liveaboards were not authorized in the State Lands lease that existed at the time. The proposed liveaboard fee was developed based on benchmarking with other Bay Area marinas as well as through a cost recovery study done by Willdan Financial Services and the Finance Department. The liveaboard fee would be on top of the standard monthly slip rental fee already listed in the master fee schedule. . The Derelict Aircraft Policy Fee was recommended for approval by the Airport Commission on November 3, 2016 by a 4-0 vote. The proposed Derelict Aircraft Policy fee was created to ensure that hangars and tie down spaces at the Petaluma Airport are fully utilized with operational aircraft for maximum fiscal benefit to the airport because operational aircraft drives fuel sales. As well, removing derelict aircraft from airport hangars will free up space to be available for aircraft on the hangar waiting list. The proposed action meets Council Goal: "Achieve Fiscal Stability and Maintain Financial Sustainability". DISCUSSION The Comprehensive User Fee Study completed in September 2015 identified new fees that allow cost recovery for each specific service listed on the fee schedule. At that time, the recommended liveaboard fee was $350 per month including electrical power while the full cost recovery was estimated to be $435 per month. The analysis .from Willdan Financial Services Consultants for this fee is included in Attachment 4 and the current recommended charge is $400 per month in addition to the monthly slip rental charge, which is based on length of vessel. This is less than the full cost recovery from 2015, and meets the requirements of Proposition 26, which requires that fees charged to not exceed the cost of providing the service. The proposed rate is comparable to other Bay Area marinas factoring in power charges, which are often billed separately. A survey of 54 marinas was conducted last year by a group that included the Marine Recreation Association, the Bay Area Harbormaster Group, and California Association of Harbormasters and Port Captains. Based on current benchmarking information for a 40' slip with electrical power hook-up and liveaboard privileges fee is the median rate of $692 a month, as shown in Attachment 5. In comparison, the total at the Petaluma Marina would be $676, which includes the per foot fee, and liveaboard fee with electrical hook-up. It is common for other marinas in the Bay area to charge an additional liveaboards fee. Several factors were taken into consideration in recommending the Marina Liveaboard fee, including: • The Petaluma Marina is authorized by the new State Lands Commission lease to have up to six liveaboards after a reasonable transition period. Currently there is an estimated 17 liveaboards. • Convenience of the Petaluma Marina location to local and regional centers. • Electric and water are included in the liveaboard fee. • Current demand for liveaboard slips is high. • Petaluma Marina slip fees are in the lowest quartile of rates in the area. • Need for additional revenue for the Marina Enterprise. The Petaluma Marina is required by the State Lands Commission to reduce the number of liveaboards down to six on or before June 30, 2019. It is believed that some of the liveaboards utilize their boats as a "second home," and once the liveaboard fee is established they will decline the opportunity and will comply with the standard slip rental requirement of no more than 3 overnights every 14 days. Additional reductions will occur through natural attrition, and the marina will not offer or accept additional liveaboards until the number of liveaboards falls below six. Derelict aircraft has been a problem at the Petaluma Airport and has caused the Airport Commission to adopt a policy on the matter included as Attachment 3. To strengthen the policy, the Commission recommended a $25 per day fee to induce an owner to quickly remove or repair a derelict aircraft. The fee would be imposed after a 30 -day notice period to allow for correction. It is felt that derelict aircraft detract from the airport's fueling business and desirability as a home base. The aforementioned User Fee Study did not evaluate the cost to provide their service. It is estimated that for each day a derelict aircraft remains at the airport after the 30 -day notice, the Airport manager will expend approximately 10 to 15 minutes to verify status of aircraft, email and or call the owner, and document actions and status. In addition, the airport ramp attendant will spend 10 to 15 minutes visiting the location of the aircraft and documenting status. At current, fully burden rates of $125.69, and $16.80 per hour for the Airport Manager and ramp attendant, respectively, and using 12.5 minutes per day, the cost of providing the derelict aircraft fee would be $29.69. Therefore, the proposed fee is less than the cost of service in accordance with Prop 26 requirements. If adopted, these proposed fees would become effective immediately. As well, the fees will become part of the City Master Fee Schedule, and will be updated annually based on the San Francisco Bay area CPI. FINANCIAL IMPACTS The Marina Liveaboard fee is estimated to increase revenues by $28,800 per year based on six liveaboards. The first year the revenues could be as high as 80,000 if all existing liveaboards remain. This revenue is not currently budgeted. The Derelict Aircraft Policy Fee is not likely to generate any notable revenues for the Airport. ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution 2. Exhibit A to Resolution 3. Derelict Aircraft Policy 4. Willdan User Fee Study Excerpts 5, Bay Area Liveaboard Comparison — 40' slip 3 Attachment 1 RESOLUTION APPROVING TWO NEW FEES TO BE ADDED TO THE MASTER FEE SCHEDULE — MARINA LIVEABOARD AND DERELICT AIRCRAFT FEES WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Petaluma ("City") has previously established fees and charges for City services; with the intent of recovering up to the City's estimated actual and reasonable costs to provide such services; and WHEREAS, with respect to fees and charges to be increased, the City has analyzed its fees and charges, the costs of providing services, the beneficiaries of the services, and the revenues produced by those paying charges for such services, and has identified two fees which should be added to the existing Master Fee Schedule and such fees are identified as Exhibit A to this resolution; and WHEREAS, in adopting the fees and charges for City services as set forth in this Resolution, the City Council of the City of Petaluma is exercising its powers under Article XI, Sections 5 and 7 of the California Constitution, Section 66014 of the California Government Code, and other applicable law; and WHEREAS, the City has a policy of recovering up to the full cost of providing voluntary services from those persons utilizing them so that general taxes are not diverted from general services to unfairly or inequitably subsidize such services; and WHEREAS, the fees and charges set forth in the schedule of fees and charges adopted by this Resolution are not taxes as defined in Article XIIIA, §3(b) (Proposition 26), of the California Constitution because such fees and charges are either: (1) imposed for a specific benefit conferred or privilege granted directly to the payor that is not provided to those not charged, and which does not exceed the reasonable costs of conferring the benefit or granting the privilege to the payor; or (2) imposed for a specific government service or product provided directly to the payor that is not provided to those not charged, and which does not exceed the reasonable costs of providing the service or product to the payor; or (3) imposed for the reasonable regulatory costs incident to issuing licenses and permits, performing investigations, inspections, and audits, enforcing agricultural marketing orders, and the administrative enforcement and adjudication thereof; or (4) imposed for entrance to or use of city property, or the purchase, rental, or lease of city property, except charges governed by Section 15 of Article XI; and WHEREAS, the fees and charges set forth in the schedule of fees and charges adopted by this Resolution are consistent with the requirements of Article XIII D (Proposition 218) of the California Constitution pursuant to Apartment Association of Los Angeles County v. City of Los Angeles (2001) 24 Cal. 4th 830, in that such fees are not applicable to incidents of property ownership, but rather actual use of City services; and 11 WHEREAS, in accordance with Government Code Section 50076, fees and charges that do not exceed the reasonable cost of providing the service or regulatory activity for which the fees are charged and which are not levied for general revenue purposes are not special taxes as defined in Article 3.5 of the Government Code; and WHEREAS, fees adopted pursuant to Government Code Sections 66014, 65104, 65456, 65909.5, and 66451.2, and Health and Safety Code Sections 17951, 19132.3, and 19852, are to be imposed pursuant to Section 66016 of the Government Code, which imposes certain procedural requirements prior to levying a new fee or service charge, or prior to approving an increase in an existing.fee or service charge; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the Government Code Section 66016, the cost analysis and support for a fee or service charge which will be increased pursuant to this Resolution was available for public review and comment for ten days prior to the public hearing at which this Resolution was adopted; and WHEREAS, in accordance with California Government Code Section 66016, at least 14 days prior to the public hearing at which the City Council first considered adoption of the fees established by this Resolution, notice of the time and place of the hearing was mailed to eligible interested parties who files written requests with the City for mailed notice of meetings on new or increased fees or service charges; and WHEREAS, 10 days advance notice of the public hearing at which this Resolution was adopted was given by publication in accordance with Section 6062a of the Government Code; and; WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City Council to adopt a schedule of fees and charges, which updates certain existing fees and charges, and/or establishes certain new fees and charges based on the City's budgeted and projected costs of services; and WHEREAS, the schedule of fees and the total amounts thereof, described in Exhibit "A" attached, are hereby determined to be reasonable in that the amounts thereof do not exceed of the estimated reasonable costs of providing the services for which the charges and fees are made, as reflected in Exhibit A. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Petaluma resolves as follows: Section 1. Findings. The following findings are true and correct and adopted as the findings of the City Council: A. The purpose of the fees and charges set forth in Exhibit "A" of this Resolution is to recover up to the full, lawfully recoverable costs incurred by the City in providing various City services, and such fees and charges not levied for general revenue purposes. 5 B. After consideration of the data and information regarding the costs of providing services relating to all fees and charges subject to this Resolution, all testimony received orally or in writing at or before the noticed public hearing, the agenda report and the background documents to the agenda report (together, "Record"), the City Council of the City of Petaluma approves and adopts the new fees set forth in Exhibit A. C. Adoption of the fees and charges set forth in Exhibit "A" of this Resolution is intended to recover costs necessary to maintain such services within the City within existing service areas and is not a "project" within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to 14 California Code of Regulations ("CEQA Guidelines") section 15378(b)(4) (the creation of government funding mechanisms or other government fiscal activities which do not involve any specific commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant impact on the environment); and/or CEQA Guidelines section 15273 (statutory exemption for rates, tolls, fares and charges within an existing service area); and/or CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3) ('common sense' general exception where there is no possibility the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment). E. The Record establishes that the costs listed in the cost analysis for those fees and charges which are to be increased and/or established as costs incurred by the City in providing City services are reasonable estimates of the cost of providing such services, and that the revisions recommended to existing fees for such services are necessary to recover the reasonable, estimated cost of providing such services. Section 2 Fee Schedule Adoption and Repeal of Prior Inconsistent Fees and Charges. The schedule of fees and charges set forth in Exhibit "A", of this Resolution, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, are hereby directed to be computed by, applied by and collected by the various City departments, for the herein listed services when provided by the City or its designated contractors. Section 3 Separate Fee for Each Process. All fees set by this Resolution are for each identified process; additional fees shall be required for each additional process or service that is requested or required. Where fees are indicated on a per-unit of measurement basis, the fee is for each identified unit or portion thereof within the indicated ranges of such units. Added Fees and Refunds. Where additional fees need to be charged and collected for completed staff work, or where a refund of excess deposited monies is due, and where such charge or refund is ten dollars ($10.00) or less, a charge or refund need not be made, pursuant to California Government Code Sections 29373.1 and 29375.1 and amendments thereto. Deposits Plus Staff Time and Materials. This means that the applicants will be billed for the full cost of processing the application based on staff time and materials over and above the amount of the deposit. Staff hourly rate shall be fully burdened and be determined by regular work rates established by the City of D Petaluma Finance Director for the given fiscal year(s) in which the application is processed. For applications requesting multiple entitlements, the deposit shall be the sum of the individual amounts. The City Manager shall have the authority to modify or waive staff time and material costs when circumstances warrant. Flat Fee Applications. This is an application fee that does not include staff time and materials. Full Cost Recovery Applications. This includes a deposit amount and the actual costs of the staff time and required materials. Section 4. Interpretation. This Resolution may be interpreted by the several City department directors in consultation with the City Manager and, should there be a conflict between two fees, then the lower in dollar amount of the two shall be applied. Section 5. Use of Fee Revenue. The revenues raised by payment of the fees and charges established by this Resolution shall be used to fund the estimated reasonable cost of providing the services for which the fees are charged, and the revenues from such fees and charges shall not be used for general revenue purposes. Section 6 Subsequent Analysis and Revision of the Fees. The fees and charges set herein are adopted and implemented by the City Council in reliance on the Record identified above. The City may continue to conduct further study and analysis to determine whether the fees and charges for City services should be revised. When additional information is available, the City Council may review the fees and charges to determine that the amounts do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the services for which the fees and charges are charged. Section 7 Annual Adjustment. The fees and charges set forth in Exhibit "A" shall be adjusted by the City Manager on July 1 st of every year by the percentage increase or decrease in the Consumer Price Index—All Items Index (San Francisco -Oakland -San Jose). Section 8. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately. In accordance with Government Code Section 66017, all new and/or increased fees and charges upon a development project, as defined in Government Code Section 66000, which apply to the filing, accepting, reviewing, approving, or issuing of an application, permit, or entitlement to use shall be effective no sooner than 60 days following the effective date of this Resolution. Those fees and charges upon a development project are identified with an asterisk in the attached Exhibit A. All other new and/or increased fees and charges not subject to Government Code Section 66017 that are set forth in Exhibit A shall become effective immediately. Section 9. Repealer. These fees and charges shall supersede the corresponding fees previously established and adopted by the City Council. All previously adopted and conflicting fees and charges and all Resolutions and other actions of the City Council are hereby repealed to the extent they conflict with the contents of this Resolution. Resolution numbers 2010-206, 2010-070 and 2007-193 are repealed. 7 Section 10. Severability. The individual fees and charges set forth in Exhibit "A" of this 'Resolution and all portions of this Resolution are severable. Should any of the fees or charges or any portion of this Resolution be adjudged to be invalid and unenforceable by a body of competent jurisdiction, then the remaining fees, charges and/or Resolution portions shall be and continue in full force and effect, except as to those fees, charges, and/or Resolution portions that have been adjudged invalid. The City Council of the City of Petaluma hereby declares that it would have adopted each of the fees and charges set forth in Exhibit "A" of this Resolution, and this Resolution and each section, subsection, clause, sentence, phrase and other portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that one or more of the fees, charges, or sections, subsections, clauses, sentences, phrases or other portions of this Resolution may be held invalid or unconstitutional. Attachment 2 Exhibit A City of Petaluma FY 2017-18 FEE ADDITIONS TO THE MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FEE DESCRIPTION FY 2017 FEES FEE INFORMATION FY 2018 FEES Marina Live Aboard NEW Liveaboard- per month; utilities included(mooring fees additional) $ 400 Alport DerelictAircraft NEW Perday $ 25 Attachment 3 6A-1 Derelict Airplane Policy for the Petaluma Airport Petaluma Municipal Airport hangars and tie down spaces are for the storage of operational aircraft. An operational aircraft is one that is currently in an airworthy condition or one that is in the active process of being made airworthy. Current airworthy aircraft are ones that have a current periodic inspection or other indicia of regular flight. Examples of an aircraft in the active process of being made airworthy are ones that are undergoing active maintenance, inspection, or construction. An aircraft that has not been airworthy for a period of six months or more is presumed to be derelict/non-operational and hence in violation of airport rules. This presumption is rebuttable by presentation of documentation, acceptable to the Airport Manager, showing progress in bringing the aircraft to a current airworthy state. When derelict or non -operational aircraft come to the attention of the Airport Manager, he/she will notify the owner/operator by up to two different methods which may include phone call, email, facsimile, or U.S. Mail. The owner/operator will have 30 days from the date of first method of notification to bring the aircraft to an operational status (more time may be granted for special circumstances at the discretion of the Airport Manager) by making it airworthy or initiating repairs to bring the aircraft to an airworthy condition. It will be the responsibility of the owner/operator to present evidence acceptable to the Airport Manager of the aircraft's upgraded status. If after 30 days the owner/operator has not presented evidence that the aircraft has been returned to an airworthy condition or that concrete steps have been taken to bring the aircraft to an airworthy condition, a $25 per day fine will be accessed until such time as evidence of airworthiness acceptable to the Airport Manager has been received. 10 City of Petaluma September 1, 2015 Corporate Office: 27368 Via Industria Suite 110 Temecula, CA 92590 Tel: (951) 587-3500 Tel: (800) 755-6864 Fax: (951) 587-3510 10 WILLDAN Financial Services Office Locations: Anaheim, CA Oakland, CA Sacramento, CA www.wilidan.com New York, NY Orlando, FL Attachment 4 11 WO'WILLDAN Financial Services The waters of the Petaluma Marina are part of the Petaluma River, a channel that runs fourteen miles from the north end of Petaluma to the San Pablo Bay. The river is enjoyed for its excellent boating, fishing, and water skiing. The Harbormaster manages the Petaluma Marina and the Turning Basin. The Marina rents 167 berths in varying size from 22' — 40' and has an overall occupancy average of 60%. The Turning Basin has over 60 berths available for non live -aboard daily or monthly rentals, and temporary transient moorings. ANALYSIS Willdan individually reviewed the services and programs associated with the Marina. The review also consisted of an evaluation of existing services in an effort to update the fee schedule. For the services being provided by the Marina, a programmatic analysis was done to see at what level current fees were recovering the cost of providing services and Marina operations. in addition, a Live -Aboard fee was added to detail a level of service that was currently being provided by the City through the mooring fees, but was not capturing the nature and cost of a residential mooring. City staff recommends some increases in fees along with the inclusion of the Live -Aboard fee. As a result, the Marina will experience greater cost recovery if participation levels remain constant. City of Petaluma Comprehensive User Fee Study 18 12 cz 0 ■ p.j ILI cz 2 ■Py rA /cz M bm 0 .P.4 �I �1 F M 0 Attachment 5 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 to O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O d N O O O d. O t0 O M O O tD 0 0 0 0 0 0 w O O O O d' N O N O M u1 '1 11d O ill O I� 00 I� O N t(1 Ln l0 O O N� a; O C)D O O to O O 6 O r4 4� to O N M lD r�O c-1 d' u1 CD W M M M M M N M d' 111 r� r-' CSO M O %-H O d- d' d' Ln Ln d' to w CD w w t0 w l0 t0 d w l0 r� t0 n F, CD I� r� n 00 w F- tn tn- V1 V)- t/} t/)• t/>_ tn- tn- ta tn• t/} -L4 -L > tn• t/? V/ . tn• to (n t/)• V/ - tn• tn- tn• V)- tn• tn- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d 0 d 0 0 0 N 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I- O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 Ln ILn Ln O 111 O O M 0 0 0 d 111 d O O N tfi O O O O O O tri O U O M d! Q r t0 d lD Ol N (71 r I Ol 01 to r-1 r -I M M N I� M M O M M O r -I d' d' M r -I I -i c -i N N N N N N N N M M N m m N N M N M N d M M d M in- tn• ( V)- V)- in tn vn tn in. v)a tn. in. -Ln tn. in. tn• in V)- t1} tn- tn- tn- in to 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M M M M M M M M M M m M M M M M rn rn M a1 01 M M M = L Q a v � O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O a O O O O O O O U Z Z Z Z (31 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z ZO Z Z Z Z Z v }v _ W C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t!1 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 4 0 l0 O to O O lD 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO O O O d 1* N O N O M to Lry O Ill O I� 00 I-� O N 111 Ln tp O O N r-� cZ O 00 O d1p: d O f3l O ri 1 w O M d• l0 00 rH N to wr� M O O O O O M M 111 w P� 00 Cr) O r•i N m m d' d'4 d' d' Ln to Ill to 111 ul tp l0 Z CD CD lD CA C.D w Co. tD to r� I\ r, 0 tn. t/� in tn• t/} in- t/>• tn• tA. t4 t/>• t/)• t/)- t/>- t/� -tn• t/>• t/� tn• tn• tn tn. ill- tn• tn• tn• t/t � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O ®i O O O O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I� O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O' O O O O to M O Ill Ln O Ln 0 0 0 0 0 0 to .4 O O N to O O O O O O' to 0 0 0 M IX to I- It I� O N O N O O lD N N O O M CO 0 0 0 0 0 O N to 111 to d i r -I ri N N N r -i N N ri N N N m N r -i N M N M N d• N N M M N .a 41 L 1,% 0 w 0 .Q O O W L t!} to t/} to to 'i%} th to to to t/l to t/} th to in in til t/) to t{} t!} :n• to t/> in t/? y0_tn• J ..r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 d O l0 O 00 O O lD 0 0 0 0 0 0 d O O O O t1 N O N O d 0 +' O O O O O I� O lD O N to O cV O O O N Ol O 00 O O tD M O M O 00 M l0 M l0 w d d' 00 M N tf1 O to I-- O Or� N O M M I11 t0 to d Ln w r, N N N N N N N M M M d M M d M M d d M d M d' 4y, d' `zf M M d t!)• t/? t/l i/l t/1• t/1• t/)• in• tn• t/>• tn• tn• tn• t/� t/} to V). to t4 -Ln -C • t/l t/); tn- t/r tn• -lh tn• O N � � c w o w � � � N V L3 a> _0 oV � 0 c U c Q. c � ai -0 c0.) cn c CCs a> •+° m ,n3 c O U Cv m O o CCS Ca. ZI O 0) a> a> lu M '`) C E '`) U C6 O (Y6 s c�6 (D M C CSC) M CME M M CCS m p O Ca O O M v 0 �' ¢ O M Q Q Q Q O Q Q 1 O m cw' E Q �j O L J I .2 LL. , 1 Il_ 1 I 1 , M , �`�/ {J� 1 �M LL W W 1 ` to L (li ,` L.. _ _ Cu Cu M*1 (n CO I .L N VJ 1 1 _ Cu C to O .L O _ 'L (n .` ,� .L '� .L .._. .` O L p LLI.. •� L [B 'iu Cn I .•may i L = lt^i vJ I E CCS C .Q U U (Q t(f •L t(S �Q M 1 'L M i M Cu G Qi CU a w cCU Cu •Md as �". t Z = U O (6 = U V N C7 O CCs = c 'U = .i CCS >, .O O L) a, CU .Q O O C >� J > -«-• N i (D Q- CCs >- cA O t +-' U (D -0 M *Zy', N toCU >,- CO Z •L % Cu U •u •o 1 .� t. c`a — U t� C� E (U N L a.. > L M \ `.l to Cu cCs i- c '� c CCs �J = G M 1_ o m �% c a> O � L' O C C .CII C Q LL >+ "O COm O cn O O L ,� _-0 i - O O w CII 03 UI O N Cu w J N �C a, W m O cC3 CCS }' Ci CII O J U _ O ai N J - CCS C O CtS c N O C .L c Cu O Cu O J `O' O' O - E Cu �!? > U a %A (D U c a> O' O U >, O in O a. O fil' � Cu ., w t3 N .sem W O O rr4' dr d' 14 15 ON O O O O O 00 O to tf1 Ob rn O O O d' N d' N N N lD 00 41 CO Q1 O 00 00 00 01 Ol m O w I*� 1 t/} tn O O O O O O O d LO O r� O O Ln O 1l1 lD qt m M Zt m m m. M M 4j)- tom. th th th ih V)- 0 O O O O O O rn rn rn rn rn rn rn 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z z z z z z z o O O O O O N 000 l00 ONO i1f 00 01 O O O d' CJ1 d' m O 1� O N I� � � 00 00 G1 Ol t0 lD vi n O O 'fid' O O O O O Lr) O 1- O O Lr) O Ln w i- O -F N O t- O N M M M N M M N M N N t/} t/} ON �. O O 00 O O . O . 00 rl O O m d' O 00 l.4 M Ol N dl N I� n 00 M d' � t.f) tf1 lD tD M M t4 V)? d .= L m cu cu a m t6 = = El i 0 E 40 3 C Q m U) m (n m U) LU M 1 1 1 N L ^^1 1..1.. L-.. oac J (LE 1 L Cu=3 . 7 O = T = .Q L @ 8 L} S ca E O M >- 0= >-U O > 'U (L6 L CLI 0 CL cu E L U Q cu C x x Lu _ V 4 - `0 cv Q. N co LA co L c� C O 15