Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Report 3.A 07/18/2005CITY OF PGTALUDIA, CALIFORNIA & A AGENDA BILL July 18, 2005 Agenda Title: An Application to Amend the Planned Unit District ; Zoning, Approve a Unit Development Plan and Development Standards, Approve a Tentative Subdivision Map, and Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Property Known as the Meeting Time: ® 3:00 PM Martin Farm at 1197 East Washington to Allow the Subdivision of ❑ 7:00 PM the 1.6 -Acre Parcel into 17 Lots and to Allow the Construction of 16 Homes, the Reuse of the Existing Farm House as Office, and the Reuse of the Existing Water Tower as an Accessory Dwelling Unit. A.P. 007-361-022; File No.: 04 -TSM -0379 -CR. (Moore/Robbe) Continued from June 30, 3005 meeting Category (check one): ❑ Consent Calendar ® Public Hearing ❑ New Business ❑ Unfinished Business ❑ Presentation Department: Director: Contact Person: Phone Number: Community Mike Moore, Tiffany Robbe, 778-4301 Development Director r�, Associate Planr�f� Cost of ProDosal: N/A Account Number: N/A Amount Budgeted: N/A Name of Fund: N/A Attachments to Agenda Packet Item: 1. Applicant's Response to Council Comment, dated June 5, 2005 2. Draft Resolution Adopting a Mitigated Negative Declaration 3. Draft Ordinance Adopting a Planned Unit District Amendment, Unit Development Plan, and Revised PUD Development Standards 4. Draft Resolution Adopting the Tentative Subdivision Map 5. Plans dated July 5, 2005 (City Council members only) Entire Plan Set at reduced size & Key Sheets (A1.2, 5, and 10) at full size Summary Statement: After two hearings, the Planning Commission forwarded a positive recommendation on the Martin Farm Subdivision to the City Council. At their regular June 201h meeting, the City Council reviewed and continued the project, due both to the late hour and in order to give the applicant time to respond to Council comment. The project has since been revised and one lot has been eliminated. The project now proposes the subdivision of the 1.6 -acre parcel at 1197 East Washington into 17 lots, the construction of 6 attached and 10 detached homes, the reuse of the existing 1910 Martin farm house as office space, and the reuse of the existing water tower as an accessory dwelling unit. Recommended Citv Council Action/Suggested Motion: The Planning Commission and staff recommend that the City Council 1) adopt a resolution approving a Mitigated Negative Declaration, 2) adopt an ordinance amending the Planned Unit District and approving the PUD Development Plan and Development Standards, and 3) adopt a resolution approving the Tentative Subdivision Map for the "Martin Fane" project. evlewed by Admin. Svcs.. Dir: L�TztDate l I l� faS Todav's Date: July 11, 2005 Reviewed by City Attornev: Date: Revision # and Date Revised # ADDroN Jt by City Manager: Date: File Code: T\CC-City Council\Rcports\MartinFamCC2.doc CITE' OF PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA JULY 18, 2005 AGENDA REPORT FOR MARTIN FARM SUBDIVISION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Civil Engineer Steven Lafranchi on behalf of Anton Selkowitz's Historic Properties LCC, is requesting approval to amend the Martin Historic Planned Unit District (PUD) to allow this project, to subdivide the 1.6 -acre property at 1197 East Washington Street into 17 lots, to adopt PUD Map and Development Standards for the "Martin Farm" Subdivision, and to allow the construction of 6 attached and 10 detached homes, the reuse of the existing 1910 Martin farm house as office space, and the reuse of the existing water tower as an accessory dwelling (granny) unit. This is a revision from the plan reviewed by Council at their June 20`h hearing, which was for an 18 lot subdivision with 10 attached and 7 detached homes. 2. BACKGROUND: On June 28, 2004, Anton Selkowitz's Historic Properties LLC formally submitted the project, which envisioned the historic Martin house used as office space, the historic water tower converted to a granny unit, and new single-family residences added behind and to the sides of the historic buildings. On March 8, 2005, the Planning Commission held their first hearing on the project. The Commission was concerned about access to and parking at the project as well as about the intensity of the site plan layout and continued the project. In response to the Commission's concerns, the applicant eliminated three of the residential units, which allowed the applicant to makes site plan modifications including increasing the amount of on-site parking, adding a common play area, preserving the landscaped yard in front of the Martin house, preserving the two large oak trees and smaller oaks, and minimizing the number of new structures most proximal to East Washington Street. Additionally, the applicant proposed alternative access via private Martin Way to public Ellis Street. At their May 10`h hearing, after reviewing the revised plans, the Planning Commission recommended the project to the City Council. The City Council reviewed the project at their regular June 201h meeting. The developer presented the project, public comment was taken, Council comment was given, and the project was continued due both to the late hour and in order to give the applicant time to respond to Council comment. MODIFICATIONS Since the June 201h hearing and in response to Council comment, the applicant has eliminated one additional lot; the former lot 12 nearest to where the Highway 101 off -ramp joins East Washington Street. The elimination of this lot increases the size of the small private park and results in less demand on the same number of shared/visitor parking spaces. The adjacent house 11 has been reoriented away from the off -ramp. The applicant has also reduced the overall height of the barn units (now units 12 and 13) by 2 feet. Thus, the applicant now proposes a 17 -lot Tentative 2 Subdivision Map and 16 new residential units along with the reuse of the existing Martin faun house and water tower. APPLICANT RESPONSE The applicant has prepared a written response to each Council's concerns expressed at the June 20°i hearing. Staff refers Council directly to this letter, which is Attachment 1, as it constitutes the direct response to the Council comment of June 20°1 . STAFF ANALYSIS Regarding pedestrian access and air quality, staff would like to provide information in addition to the Attachment 1 letter. Pedestrian Access, Concern I In response to concerns of Council and the applicant regarding pedestrian access, staff re -reviewed this issue. In response to at least one Council member's desire for additional pedestrian access through the shopping center via Sturcon Way (see the civil/Lafranchi sheets), staff and the applicant continue to find the access agreement that has been reached with the shopping center owners for a public sidewalk along East Washington preferable to access at private Sturcon Way. This is because a sidewalk along East Washington follows a public street, will be a legitimate public sidewalk, and leads directly to a signalized intersection; whereas Sturcon has none of these benefits. In response to the applicant's concern that the proposed off-site sidewalk along Martin Way, where it is adjacent to the Sonoma County Water Agency, maybe impossible to construct at the standard 5 foot width, the City Engineer, reviewed the site conditions and constraints at this location. Due to these physical constrains, the City Engineer found that a 4 foot wide sidewalk at this location would be acceptable. Recommended condition 26 has been modified to reflect this. Air Quality, Concern 2 The State Air Resources Board is developing an Air Quality and Land Use Handbook. It has not yet been adopted, but this is expected to occur in the near term. Wien it is adopted, it will offer advisory recommendations to assist local governments in making land use decisions. The draft document recommends that houses and other sensitive receptors not be sited within 500 feet of a freeway such as Highway 101. This recommendation does not apply to East Washington or to the adjacent off -ramp, which have a significantly lower number of daily trips than Highway 101. The entirety of the Martin project is slightly more than 500 feet from Highway 101, approximately 540 feet; thus, it does comply with the anticipated recommendation of the Air Resource Board. PUBLIC CORRESPONDENCE Since the last Council hearing and as of July 111h, no new public comments have been received. 3. ALTERNATIVES: a. The City Council may accept the recommendation from the Planning Commission to approve the proposed project with modifications to the conditions of approval. b. The City Council may deny the request for the PUD amendment, Tentative Parcel Map, and PUD Development Standards. 4. FINANCIAL IMPACTS: This is a private development subject to any applicable City Special Development Fees. The ^ project is subject to the cost recovery fee system; therefore, the developer is required to pay all costs {j associated with processing the application. To date the City has collected $14,522. Approximately 251.5 hours of total staff time at a cost of $12,359.65 has been expended to date. If this project is ultimately approved, additional staff time will be required to guide the application through the HCP/SPARC, Final Map, and building permit process; however additional fees will be collected as specified by the cost recovery fee system and/or at the time new applications (FSM) are filed. 5. CONCLUSION: The Planning Commission found that the proposed Planned Unit District (PUD) amendment, PUD Map and Development Standards, and Tentative Subdivision Map for the "Martin Fann" Subdivision would not create any new significant environmental impacts and that the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance, and the Municipal Code. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the project, with conditions. 6. OUTCOMES OR PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS THAT WILL IDENTIFY SUCCESS OR, COMPLETION: N/A 7. RECOMMENDATION: After Council finds that their comments have been adequately addressed, the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council introduce an Ordinance amending the Martin PUD and approving a unit development plan and PUD Development Standards, adopt a resolution for a Mitigated Negative Declaration, and approve a Resolution for a 17 -lot Tentative Subdivision Map to allow the construction of 16 new single-family homes and the reuse of the Martin house and water tower. s*c/reports/MartinramsCC2.doc /I T_SV iI1Ct Citv Council Meetine Response Project: Martin Historic Properties Date: July 5, 2005 Architectural Design & Restoration Rick Dtereton and Church Hildreth, Architects 1197 E. Washington Street, Petaluma, CA 9.{952 707-; 78-7232,707-7778 1096 fax %�v.adr-petatuma.com t.'! The City Council in their meeting of June 20, 2005 reviewed the Martin Farm, Subdivision. As a result of that review we have revised the attached drawings to incorporate their suggestions and concerns. We have listed the areas of concern below, with an explanation of the revision or response. Concerns of the Council are shown in italics. 1. Pedestrian access through Sturcon Way. The Developers have had extensive talks with the Owners of the shopping center concerning vehicle and pedestrian access thru the easement on Sturcon Way. Because the shopping center Owners are opposed to any access, vehicular or pedestrian, and because the Planning Commission believed the preferred access was along East Washington this is where we have proposed it. 2. Concern of air quality for units 11 and 12 being too close to the freeway. We have measured the distance from the property to the freeway and have found that it is over 500' away. Because of this distance we do comply with the recommended setback for residential units regarding this issue. 3. Noise from freeway offramp adjacent to units 11 and 12. We have eliminated unit 12 from this area and reoriented unit 11 to direct the living areas and bedrooms away from the off ramp. We have also prepared a site section showing the relationship of unit 11 to the off ramp. Refer to B/A1.2. The new plan and section have been reviewed by Richard Rodkin of Illingworth & Rodkin and found to meet their criteria for sound levels. 4. Play area size. With the elimination of unit 12 we were able to extend the play area in the north-east direction. This area has increased 20%, from 2,000 sf to over 2,500 sf 5. Questions concerning parking. This issue was discussed at the hearing and we believe, as does staff, that there is adequate parking. The additional area gained at the site due to the elimination of unit 12 has been designated as part of the play area. It would be possible to take some of this space for parking if the Council believes that would be more appropriate. The 3 parking spaces designated for unit 12 were eliminated along with the unit. Since the shared parking has remained unchanged, the net result is an increase since fewer units now share the same amount of parking. 6. Historic nature of barn units. There was some discussion of the barn units and their relationship to the Martin Residence and water tower. We have looked at the proportions of the barn units and modified the foundation from a raised floor to slab on grade in order to be more consistent with the proportions of the original barn. This has reduced the overall height by approximately two feet. Attachment 1 J u . r %41,,, . 111'Gl1'G](I% Architectural Design S Restoration Pick Dreietou and Church Hildreth, Abchilecis u97 E. Washington Street, Petaluma, CA 94952 707-778-7232,707-778-m96 7oi-778-m96 fax %kry .adr-petalmna.com Should the water tower lot be combined with the Martin residence? The Developer has researched this possibility and would prefer to keep the water tower with the barn units. If the water tower (residential use) were to be part of the Martin House (commercial use) then it would be more of a studio dwelling instead of a granny unit. Because of the existing footprint it seems to work better as an accessory dwelling rather than a stand alone unit. We have also been told that it would be much more difficult to obtain an SBA loan on the property if it has a residential unit attached. We believe that the future use and appearance of the tower can be preserved with the proper use of CC&R's on the property. We have tried to address all of the issues from the June 20'h meeting. We believe that the plan has evolved and improved because of these revisions. We look forward to our upcoming meeting with the Council. Sincerely, Rick Brereton Architect 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 i8 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 DRAFT RESOLUTION NO. N.C.S. APPROVAL OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE MARTIN FARM SUBDIVISION AT 1197 EAST WASHINGTON STREET AND PRIVATE MARTIN CIRCLE; APN 007-361-022 WHEREAS, an Initial Study of potential environmental impacts was prepared and the results of the study indicated that the proposed Martin Farm subdivision project, as mitigated, will not cause any significant adverse environmental impacts; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Petaluma held public hearings on March 8 and May 10, 2005, on the subject application, heard testimony, and concluded that the findings and conditions as amended were adequate and recommended to the City Council approval of the proposed development; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered the Martin Farm subdivision proposal on June 20 and Jilly 18, 2005, and considered all written and verbal communications concerning potential environmental impacts resulting from the project before rendering a decision; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approves a Mitigated Negative Declaration subject to the following Findings and Mitigation Measures: 1. An Initial Study was prepared and demonstrated that there is no substantial evidence that supports a fair argument that the project, as conditioned, would have a significant effect on the environment. A Mitigated Negative Declaration was drafted to avoid or reduce to a level of insignificance, potential noise, biological, transportation/traffic, and historic resource impacts generated by the proposed project. 2. The project does not have the potential to have a significant adverse impact on wildlife resources as defined in the State Fish and Game Code, either individually or cumulatively and is not exempt from Fish and Game filing fees. 3. The project is not located on a site listed on any Hazardous Waste Site List compiled by the State pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the California Government Code. 4. The Planning Commission reviewed the Initial Study and considered public comments before making a recommendation on the project. 5. That a Mitigation Monitoring Program has been prepared to ensure compliance with the adopted mitigation measures. 6. The record of proceedings of the decision on the project is available for public review at the City of Petaluma Planning Division, City Hall, 11 English Street, Petaluma, California. Mitigation Measures All mitigation measures, as identified in the Initial Study for the Martin Farm subdivision proposal, are herein incorporated (Attachment .`, Initial Study). Attachment 2 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. N.C.S. APPROVAL OF A PLANNED UNIT DISTRICT AMENDMENT AND APPROVING THE UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR THE MARTIN FARM SUBDIVISION TO ALLOW FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE AT 1197 EAST WASHINGTON STREET AND PRIVATE MARTIN CIRCLE; APN 007-361-022 WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. 2088 N.C.S. on May 19, 1999, Assessor's Parcels 007-361-022 was rezoned from R-1:6,500 (One -Family Residential District) to a Planned Unit District (PUD) with a Historic Overlay; and WHEREAS, by action taken on May 10, 2005, the Planning Commission considered the current Martin Farm proposal and forwarded a recommendation with conditions to the City Council to amend the previously established PUD and approve the modified PUD Development Standards and the PUD Map to allow the Martin Farm Subdivision; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) have been satisfied through the preparation of an Initial Study and adoption of Resolution No. N.C.S., approving a Mitigated Negative Declaration to address the specific impacts of the Martin Farm subdivision; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on the proposed project on June 20 and Jule 18, 2005 and, after giving notice of said hearing, in the manner, for the period, and in the form required by Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S., as amended; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the proposed amendment to the Martin PUD and the Martin Farms Unit Development Plan and PUD Development Standards; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approves the PUD Zoning Amendment subject to the following Findings, Conditions, and Mitigation Measures: 1. The proposed Amendment to Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S., to amend the Planned Unit District to allow the Martin property to develop as proposed rather than as a business park is consistent with the Petaluma General Plan. The PUD Amendment will result in a more desirable use of land and a better physical environment than would be possible under any single zoning district or combination of zoning districts. The proposed 4-7 16 residences and the use of the existing house as an office complies with the General Plan designation of the site as Mixed Use, which allows a combination of residential, commercial, and retail uses. The proposed density of 41-410.7 dwelling units per acre would be compatible with the range allowed by the Mixed Use designation as, Attachment 3 I I a. The project provides measurable community benefit in that it retains the historic Martin 2 house and water tower while allowing residential opportunities that are architecturally 3 compatible with the existing property (thus, furthering General Plan goals), and 4 b. Infrastructure, services, and facilities are available to serve the increased density, and 5 C. The Historic and Cultural Preservation/Site Plan and Architectural Review Committee 6 process will ensure superior design ensures an attractive, comfortable and healthy living 7 environment. 8 9 2. The proposal is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance in that it incorporates the policies and 10 guidelines of the Historic Article 17 as well as Planned Unit District Article 19A. 11 12 3. The public necessity, convenience and general welfare clearly permit and will be furthered by 13 the proposed amended PUD zoning in that the amended zoning designation will result in 14 residential and office uses that are appropriate and compatible with the existing surrounding 15 uses. The project plans present a unified and organized arrangement of lots and public streets, 16 appropriate to adjacent and nearby properties. Proposed landscaping would further ensure 17 compatibility. The proposed project would also require review and approval by the Historic 18 and Cultural Preservation/Site Plan and Architectural Review Committee. 19 20 4. The requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) have been satisfied 21 through the preparation of an Initial Study and the drafting of a Mitigated Negative Declaration 22 to avoid or reduce to a level of insignificance potential noise, biological, transportation/traffic, 23 and historic resource impacts generated by the proposed project. In compliance with the 24 requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, an Initial Study was prepared for 25 amendment to the PUD zoning at the property. Based upon the Initial Study, a determination 26 was made that no significant environmental impacts would result. A copy of this notice was 27 published in the ArRus Courier and provided to residents and occupants within 500 feet of the 28 site, in compliance with CEQA requirements. 29 30 5. The property at 1197 E. Washington Street is a historic resource, contributes to Petaluma's 31 heritage, and enhances its character. The Martin house, water tower/pump house, bam, and 32 tack house all contribute to the historic significance of the property. The proposed project is 33 generally consistent with Zoning Article 17, as it would avoid adverse affects to the exterior 34 architectural characteristics of the Martin farm house and the water tower/pump house; the two 35 most visually prominent structures on the property. Retention and rehabilitation of these two 36 structures would be sufficient for the historic resource to continue to be considered historically 37 significance for CEQA purposes as it would continue to appear to be eligible for listing in the 38 National Register or as a City landmark. Mitigation measures are adopted to reduce the 39 development impact to a less -than -significant level. The Historic District Overlay (H) hereby 40 applies to the Martin house and water tower parcels (lots 14 and 19 13 and 17) and these lots 41 shall be subject to the control and standards contained in Article 17 of the Petaluma Zoning 42 Ordinance. The PUD Development Standards for the site as a whole specify the re -use of the 43 two historic structures and require that all new development be compatibility with the historical 44 character of the Martin site. 45 46 All conditions of the Martin Farm Tentative Subdivision Map and all mitigation measures as 47 identified in the Initial Study for the Martin Farm subdivision proposal, are herein incorporated. 48 49 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approves the Unit Development Plan 5o and PUD Development Standards subject to the following Findings, Conditions, and Mitigation 51 Measures: jI 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 to 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 The Unit Development Plan, including the Development Standards, will result in appropriate and compatible uses in the district. 2. The PUD is proposed on property which has suitable relationship to one or more thoroughfares (East Washington Street and Ellis Street), and that said thoroughfares are adequate to carry any additional traffic generated by development, as demonstrate by the Traffic hnpact Study. 3. The plan for the proposed development presents a unified and organized arrangement of buildings and service facilities which are appropriate in relation to adjacent or nearby properties, and that provisions for adequate landscaping and screening are included to ensure compatibility. Conditions have been incorporated requiring design and development standards that are compatible with neighboring developments. 4. The natural and scenic qualities of the site are protected, with adequate available public and private spaces designated on the Unit Development Plan. 5. The development of the subject property in the manner proposed by the applicant, and as conditioned, will not be detrimental to the public welfare, will be in the best interests of the City, and will be in keeping with the general intent and spirit of the zoning regulations of the City of Petaluma, and with the Petaluma General Plan. The density standard under the proposed Development Standards will be 444 10.7 dwelling units per acre which is appropriate for the site and consistent with the General Plan, as found above. 6. The requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) have been satisfied through the preparation of an Initial Study and the drafting of a Mitigated Negative Declaration to avoid or reduce to a level of insignificance, potential impacts generated by the proposed Martin Farm Subdivision/Planned Unit District. 7. The project, as conditioned per the resolution approving the Tentative Subdivision Map (Resolution No. __J complies with the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code and the General Plan. All conditions of the Martin Farm Tentative Subdivision Map and all mitigation measures as identified in the Initial Study for the Martin Farm subdivision proposal, are herein incorporated. ID 1 DRAFT 2 RESOLUTION NO. N.C.S. 3 4 APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR THE 5 MARTIN FARM SUBDIVISION 6 AT 1197 EAST WASHINGTON STREET AND PRIVATE MARTIN CIRCLE; 7 APN 007-361-022 8 9 WHEREAS, by action taken on May 10, 2005, the Planning Commission considered the proposal 10 and forwarded a recommendation to the City Council to approve the Tentative Subdivision Map; 11 and 12 13 WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the requirements of the California Environmental Quality 14 Act (CEQA) have been satisfied through the preparation of an Initial Study and adoption of 15 Resolution No. _ N.C.S., approving a Mitigated Negative Declaration to address the specific 16 impacts of the Martin Farm subdivision; and 17 18 WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. N.C.S., the Planned Unit District of Assessor's Parcel 19 Number 007-361-022 was amended and the Unit Development Plan and PUD Development 20 Standards were adopted, thereby, permitting the Martin Farm project; and 21 22 WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on the proposed project on June 20 and Jule 18, 23 2005, after giving notice of said hearing, in the manner, for the period, and in the form required by 24 Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S., as amended; and 25 26 WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the Tentative Subdivision Map; 27 28 29 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approves a Tentative Subdivision 30 Map subject to the following Findings, Conditions, and Mitigation Measures: 31 32 1. The proposed Tentative Subdivision Map, as conditioned, is consistent with the provisions 33 of Title 20, Subdivisions, of the Municipal Code (Subdivision Ordinance) and the State 34 Subdivision Map Act. 35 36 2. That the proposed subdivision, together with provisions for its design and improvements, is 37 consistent with the General Plan, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or 38 welfare in that adequate public facilities exist or will be installed, including roads, 39 sidewalks, water, sewer, storm drains, and other infrastructure. 40 41 3. That the site is physically suitable for the density and the type of development proposed. 42 43 4. That the design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements will not cause substantial 44 environmental damage, and that no substantial or avoidable injury will occur to fish or 45 wildlife or their habitat. An Initial Study was prepared indicating that there would be no 46 significant, unmitigatable environmental impacts. 47 Attachment 4 I From the Plasmin¢ Division (778-4301) 2 3 1. Before issuance of any development permit, the applicant shall revise the site plan or other 4 first sheet of the office and job site copies of the Building Permit plans to list these Conditions 5 of Approval and the Mitigation Measures as notes. 6 7 2. The plans submitted for building permit review shall be in substantial compliance with the 8 plans date stamped May 23 Judy 5, 2005. 9 10 3. All mitigation measures adopted in conjunction with the Mitigated Negative Declaration for 11 the Martin Farm project are herein incorporated by reference as conditions of project approval. 12 13 4. Upon approval by the City Council, the applicant shall pay the $35.00 Notice of 14 Determination fee to the Planning Division. The check shall be made payable to the County 15 Clerk. Planning staff will file the Notice of Determination with the County Clerk's office 16 within five (5) days of receiving Council approval. The State Department of Fish and Game 17 has found that a de minimis determination is not appropriate, and that an environmental filing 18 fee (as required under Fish and Game Code Section 711.4d) must be paid to the Sonoma 19 County Clerk on or before the filing of the Notice of Determination (for fee amount, contact 20 them at 944-5500). 21 22 5. Historic and Cultural Preservation/Site Plan and Architectural Review Committee shall review 23 site plan design, building and accessory structure design, PUD Development Standards, colors 24 and materials, landscaping, play area, and lighting. SPARC should consider possibly: 25 • Relocating one or more of the visitor parking spaces 12-15 to create more front yard space, 26 ■ Improving the bam unit by diversifying it more from the standard unit type, 27 ■ Reducing the homogeneity of the unit plan type, 28 ■ Improving the parking spaces south of the farm house, and 29 ■ Utilizing a low open fence in front of the farm house to define the private space. 30 31 6. The Martin house shall be structurally rehabilitated (foundation, structural, roofing shall be 32 evaluated and brought up to a sound level) to ensure against the loss to the historic resource. 33 (See also Historic Mitigation Measure h.) 34 35 7. Prior to submittal of any building permit, the work described in Historic Mitigation Measures 36 f and h (rehabilitation plans for the water tower/pump house and Martin house) shall be 37 completed. 38 39 8. Prior to certificate of occupancy of 80% of units, the construction described in Historic 40 Mitigation Measures f and h and Condition 6 shall be completed and those permits finaled. 41 42 9. Prior to Improvement Plan approval, those plans shall be modified so that rolled curbs are 43 only utilized where necessary for fire vehicle access purposes. 44 45 -19. PF:3F t3 git)' GE,11164 ... .. full S8t Of...,., plete t 7 , 7 « nim .: 31kizs shall ba 46 1 .7 « d- d h i fe i fie ] 6 of r.rt. grled. The guns shall b3�rp -"" ""�" "" "�"� this staff 1z r '" 47 shall be e8ffeeteg. This grsj3et shallnot be seheduled f ,, r:«,. Gets eil tearing prier to the 48 reeeipt and r-eview ef these plans by staff, 49 12— 1 11. Prior to SPARC review, the plans shall depict enclosed or covered bike parking for one 2 bicycle and a covered exterior bike rack (near the front entrance) for one bicycle at the Martin 3 house/office. 4 5 12. Prior to Building Permit approval, each duplex and single-family unit shall call out a bicycle 6 hanging hook or storage device/area within the secure covered garage space. 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 13. Prior to SPARC review, the plans shall show a bench in front of the Martin house/office. Specifications on the bench shall also be provided to SPARC. 14. Prior to SPARC review, an exterior lighting plan shall be submitted. Said plan shall include a detail of the types of all fixtures to be installed for review and approval. All lighting shall be hooded and project downward, providing a soft "wash" of light. Flood lights are inappropriate, only low profile light standards and/or wall mounted lights shall be allowed. No lighting on the site shall create a direct glare into cyclist/pedestrian eyes. 15. Prior to the Building Permit Final on the Martin office, the applicant shall provide to the City a copy of the simple one-page document they have prepared describing alternatives to driving and incentives for employees to walk, cycle, or take transit. 16. The applicant and the Homeowners' Association (HOA) shall be required to utilize Best Management Practices regarding pesticide/herbicide use and fully commit to Integrated Pest Management techniques for the protection of pedestrian/bicyclists. The applicant shall be required to post signs when pesticide/lierbicide use occurs to warn pedestrians and bicyclists. 17. Prior to SPARC review, the applicant shall provide CDD with a written statement from the noise consultant stating that the consultant has reviewed the sound wall(s)/fence proposed by the applicant and found it to satisfy Noise Mitigation Measure a. 18. Prior to certificate of occupancy of 80% of units, all eucalyptus trees approved for removal shall be removed and all stumps ground. 19. In the event that archaeological remains are encountered during grading, work shall be halted temporarily and a qualified archaeologist shall be consulted for evaluation of the artifacts and to recommend future action. The local Native American community shall also be notified and consulted in the event any archaeological remains are uncovered. 20. All noise generating construction activities shall be limited to daytime, weekday (non -holiday hours) 7:30am to 6pm and 9am to 6pm Saturdays. 21. All construction equipment powered by internal combustion shall be properly muffled and maintained to minimize noise. Equipment shall be turned off when not in use. 22. Construction maintenance, storage, and staging areas for construction equipment shall avoid proximity to residential areas to the maximum extent practicable. Stationary construction equipment, such as compressors, mixers, etc., shall be placed away from residential areas and/or provided with acoustical shielding. Quiet construction equipment shall be used when possible. 23. Construction and demolition debris shall be recycled to the maximum extent feasible in order to minimize impacts on the landfill. 1 3 l 1 24. Prior to City Council review, the plans shall note a public pedestrian and bicycle access 2 easement over parcel A from the driveway and sidewalk at East Washington Street to the 3 pathway (adjacent to lot 1) to the property line shared with SCWA. 4 5 From the Eneineerine Division (778-4301): 6 7 25. Prior to Final Map approval, the East Washington Street sidewalk easement document shall be 8 recorded on the shopping center site. 9 10 26. Prior to Improvement Plan approval, the plans shall be modified to depict the sidewalk 11 between the Washington Creek apartment parking lot and the SCWA property line as at least 12 5 feet wide or 4 feet wide with the installation of wheel stops. 13 14 27. Prior to Improvement Plan approval, the plans shall be show the sidewalk along East 15 Washington Street as 5 -feet wide. 16 17 28. The site distance at the intersection of Martin Way and Ellis Street shall meet the standard as 18 specified in the traffic report for private driveways. The proposed bulb -outs, stop sign, 19 pedestrian ramps and crosswalk shall be installed. 20 21 29. Vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian access shall be constructed as proposed. Final design shall 22 be subject to review and approval of improvement plans. 23 24 30. Grading shall conform to geotechnical investigation report. Erosion control measures, storm 25 water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) and notice of intent (NOI) shall be prepared as 26 required by the city and/or jurisdictional authority. 27 28 31. The private street shall be at least 20 -feet wide as proposed. On street parking shall not be 29 allowed except in designated areas as proposed. Red curbs and no parking signs shall be 30 provided. A minimum pavement thickness of 4 -inches shall be provided in the street section 31 of Parcel A. 32 33 32. The sanitary sewer and storm drain system shall be private and privately maintained. The 34 proposed water main shall be public and have a separate 10 -foot wide easement within parcel 35 A with limited utility crossings and subject to review by Water Resources and Conservation. 36 The water main system shall be capable of delivering a continuous fire flow as designated by 37 the Fire Marshal. 38 39 33. Maintenance of the private street, private sanitary sewer, private storm drains and other shared 40 facilities shall require a recorded document. 41 42 34. Easements for shared facilities shall be recorded on the final map. 43 44 35. The common parcel A requires a creation of a Homeowners' Association. 45 46 36. Prepare final map and improvement plans per latest standards, codes, resolution, ordinances 47 and policies. 48 49 From the Building Division (778-4301): 50 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 37. Prior to any (other) building permit issuance, a building permit shall first be issued for the historic Martin house including all work necessary to make the building comply with CBC Section 3405 for such division or group of office occupancy (shall be brought up to standards, including disability and structural). Prior to certificate of occupancy of 80% of units in the subdivision, all required work on this building shall be finaled. 38. Prior to any (other) building permit issuance, a building permit shall first be issued for the existing water tower/pump house including all work necessary to make the building comply with CBC Section 3404 and 3405 for new buildings and the requirements for such division or group of residential occupancy (shall be brought up to standards, including disability and structural). Prior to certificate of occupancy of 80% of units in the subdivision, all required work on this building shall be finaled. From the Fire Marshal (778-4398): 39. Prior to building permit issuance for the two units at the complete north end of the project (units 11 and 12), these plans shall depict Iwo this units as "fully fire sprinklered" as mitigation for fire apparatus tum -around. In all other dwellings, fire sprinkler system designed and installed in accordance with N.F.P.A. 13-D is required in residential structures; bathrooms over 55 square feet, closets over 24 square feet, or 3 feet deep, and other attached structures. These systems shall be calculated for two -head activation for the most remote two heads. 40. A permit is required from the Fire Marshal's Office for the installation of sprinkler system prior to commencement of work. A minimum of four (4) sets of plans with calculations is required to be submitted for review, approval, and permit. 41. Painting curbs red shall designate all required fire lanes where parking is not permitted. Where no curbs exist, signs approved by the Fire Marshal shall be installed. 42. Parking shall be in designated parking spaces only. On -street parking within this project shall not be permitted except where specified on the civil sheets. 43. Prior to Certificate of Occupancy, post addresses numbers on or near entry door. Numbers to be a minimum of four inches high with a minimum 3/8" stroke on a contrasting background or internally lit and must be visible from the street. 44. Prior to Improvement Plan approval, the design details for the speed tables on Sturcon Way shall be submitted to the Fire Marshal's Office for review and approval. 45. Prior to City Council review, the turn radius at the location where the road from East Washington intersects the road serving the majority of homes must be R=25. 46. Prior to Improvement Plan approval, provide fire hydrants as required by the Fire Marshal's office. 47. Prior to approval of Final Map, the applicant shall provide fire flow calculations for review and approval by the Fire Marshal's Office; minimum fire flow for this project is 1500 gpm at 20 psi residual. 15