Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Report 3.G 10/17/20053.G October 17, 2005 EFFECTIVE DATE ORDINANCE NO. 2226 N.C.S. OF ORDINANCE 3 Introduced by Seconded by 4 5 6 7 8 AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE NO. 2178 ADOPTING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) TO ALLOW 9 FOR DEVELOPMENT OF 26 AFFORDABLE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES ON SOUTHGATE AFFORDABLE 10 HOUSING SITE, AND APPROVAL OF THE REVISED PUD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND UNIT 11 DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND FOR THE SOUTHGATE SUBDIVISION LOCATED AT EAST OF FRATES ROAD 12 BETWEEN LAKEVILLE HIGHWAY AND ELY ROAD; APNS 017-150-019 AND 017-030-022 13 14 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PETALUMA AS FOLLOWS: 15 16 Section 1. The City Council finds that the Planning Commission filed with the City Council its 17 report set forth in its minutes of August 9, 2005, recommending the adoption of an amendment 18 to the Southgate PUD and associated changes to PUD Development Standards to allow a 19 change in the type of number and type of affordable housing units to be constructed on the 20 Affordable Housing Parcel Assessor's Parcel No. 017-150-019. 21 22 Section 2. The City Council further finds that said Planning Commission held a public hearing on 23 said proposed amendment on August 9, 2005, after giving notice of said hearing, in the manner, 24 for the period, and in the form required by said Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S., as amended. 25 26 Section 3. Pursuant to the provisions of Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S., as amended, the City 27 Council finds as follows: 28 29 1. The proposed Amendment to the Southgate Planned Unit Development (PUD), will result 30 in a more desirable use of land and a better physical environment than would be 31 possible under any single zoning district or combination of zoning districts. 32 33 The proposed uses comply with the Urban Diversified land use designation of the General 34 Plan, which allows for residential densities of 5-10 units per acre and invites flexibility in site 35 design and unit type. In addition, this proposal incorporates the policies and guidelines 36 of the Planned Unit Development of Article 19A of the Zoning Ordinance. 37 38 2. The public necessity, convenience and welfare clearly permit and will be furthered by 39 the proposed Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance, reclassifying and rezoning the 40 project site to Planned Unit Development. 41 42 The PUD Development Standards (as revised) for the Southgate Residential Development 43 identifies permitted and conditional uses allowed within the approved PUD. 44 Ordinance No. 2226 N.C.S. Page I 3. The requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) have been satisfied through the preparation of an Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration to avoid or reduce to a level of insignificance, potential impacts generated by the proposed Southgate Residential Development. In compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, an Initial Study was prepared for the Southgate Residential Development. Based upon the Initial Study, a determination was made that no significant environmental effects would result. A copy of this notice was published in the Argus -Courier and provided to residents and occupants within 500 feet of the site, in compliance with CEQA requirements. Section 4. Pursuant to the provisions of Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S., and based upon the evidence it has received and in accordance with the findings made, the City Council hereby adopts an amendment to said Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S., so as to amend the Southgate PUD, in accordance with the recommendation of the Planning Commission. Section 5. The City Council hereby approves the Unit Development Plan and Residential Development standards finding that: 1. The Unit Development Plan, including the Development Standards will result in appropriate and compatible uses in the district. 2. The PUD is proposed on property which has suitable relationship to one or more thoroughfares, and that said thoroughfares are adequate to carry any additional traffic generated by development. 3. The plan for the proposed development presents a unified and organized arrangement of buildings and service facilities which are appropriate in relation to adjacent or nearby properties, and that provisions for adequate landscaping and/or screening are included to ensure compatibility. Conditions have been incorporated requiring design and development standards that are compatible with neighboring developments. 4. The natural and scenic qualities of the site are protected, with adequate available public and private spaces designated on the Unit Development Plan. 5. The development of the subject property in the manner proposed by the applicant, and as conditioned, will not be detrimental to the public welfare, will be in the best interests of the City, and will be in keeping with the general intent and spirit of the zoning regulations of the City of Petaluma, and with the Petaluma General Plan. 6. The project, as conditioned per the resolution approving the Tentative Map (Resolution No. 2005-170 N.C.S.) complies with the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code and the General Plan. 7. The Unit Development Plan for the Southgate Affordable Housing Site shall be subject to the applicable conditions of Tentative Subdivision Map, including Mitigation Measures adopted as conditions of approval. Section 6. The City Clerk is hereby directed to post this Ordinance for the period and in the manner required by the City Charter. Ordinance No. 2226 N.C.S. Page 2 I IF ANY SECTION, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase or word of this Ordinance is for any 2 reason held to be unconstitutional, unlawful or otherwise invalid by a court of competent 3 jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. 4 The City Council of the City of Petaluma hereby declares that it would have passed and adopted 5 this Ordinance and each and all provisions thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more of 6 said provisions be declared unconstitutional, unlawful or otherwise invalid. 7 8 INTRODUCED and ordered posted this 3m day of October 2005. 9 10 ADOPTED this day of 2005 by the following vote: 11 12 AYES: 13 NOES: 14 ABSENT 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ATTEST: 27 28 29 30 31 32 Claire Cooper, City Clerk 33 34 David Glass, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Richard R. Rudnansky, City Attorney Ordinance No. 2226 N.C.S. Page 3