HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Minutes 09/06/1977MINUTES. OF` MEETING
OF CITY COUNCIL
PETALUMA CALIFORNIA
SEPTEMBER 6;, 1977
REGULAR MEETING
ROLL CALL
INVOCATION
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
CONSENT CALENDAR
Agenda Item #1
APPROVE FINAL
SUBDIVISION MAP- -
MICELI SUBDIVISION
RES #7881 NCS
The Regular Meeting. 0f the Petaluma City Council was
called to order by Mayor Helen Putnam at the hour of
7:35 p.m.
Present: Councilmen Bond, Cavanagh„ Harbefson,
Hilligoss, Perry, and Mayor Putnam.
Absent: Councilman Balshaw advised Mayor Putnam he
would be unable to attend the meeting due to
a death in the family.
The Reverend-Godfrey W. J. Hartzel, Rector Emeritus,
St. John "s Episcopal Church, gave the invocation.
Mayor Helen Putnam led the Pledge of Allegiance to the
Flag.
A motion was made by Councilman. Cavanagh and seconded
by Councilman Perry to adopt resolutions for Item #1
arid' Items #3 through #9 on the Consent Calendar, and to
introduce the Ordinance,. Agenda Item #2.
Resolution #7881_N.C.S., approving final subdivision ��®
map of Miceli Subdivision was adopted.
Agenda Item #2 Ordinance #1262 N.C.S. amending Zoning Ordinance #1072
ORDINANCE AMENDING N.C.S. to prezone approximately six acres from M -L,
ZONING ORDINANCE-- light industrial, to C =H, highway commercial, northeast
SANDERSON & BIG "R•" corner Old Redwood Highway and McDowell Blvd. North,
ORD #1262 NCS Sanderson and Big "R ", was introduced to publish.
Agenda Item #3
AUTHORIZE MAYOR TO
SIGN CONSENT TO
COMMON USE AGREEMENT
WITH PACIFIC GAS '&
ELECTRIC
RES #7882 NCS
Agenda Item, #4
APPROVE CLAIM
OF R.M. SARTORI
RES #7883 NCS
Agenda Item #5
APPROVE CLAIMS
AND BILLS
RES #7884 NCS
Agenda Item #6
ESTABLISH SURCHARGE
FOR WATER CONNECTION
RES #7885 NCS
Agenda Item #7
ADOPT PROCEDURES
& FEES FOR DISSEMI-
NATION OF RECORDS
RES #7886 NCS
Resolution #7882 N.C.S. authorizing Mayor to sign a F ��
Consent to Common Use Agreement with Pacific Gas and
Electric Company was adopted. (Alderwood Subdivision -
East Washington Street Widening.)
Resolution #7883 N.C.S. approving claim of R. M. r r �I
Sartori, .733 Mountain View Avenue, was adopted. r
Resolution #7884 N.C.,S. approving claims and bills
#2905 through #3006, inclusive, General City; and #564
through #589, inclusive, Water, approved for payment by
the City 'Manager, was adopted.
Resolution #7885 N.C.S. establishing the surcharge for FI Q I
water connection as required, by Petaluma Municipal Code
Section 15.18.160, was adopted.
Resolution #7886 M.C.S. adopting procedures and fees ��
for the dissemination of, records pursuant to the
California Public Record's Act, was adopted.
September 6, 1977
Agenda Item #8
APPROVE SPECIFICA-
TIONS- -EIGHT RADIOS
AND CALL FOR BIDS
RES #'78'87 'NCS
Agenda Item X69
APPOLk VOTING
/ REPRESENTATIVE AND
ALTERNATE -- LEAGUE OF
CALIFORNIA.CITIES
ANNUAL CONFERENCE
RES • #7'888 NGS
Resolution #7887 N.C.S. approving specifications for
eight radios, approved in the 1977 - 7'8 Budget,,and
calling forbids, was adopted.
Resolution X7888 N:.C.S. appointing Mayor Mayor Helen Putnam
as Voting Representative of the City ,Co.uncil .of the
City of .Petaluma, appointing Vice- Mayo r`William.A.
Perry, Jr. as Voting Representative in the absence of
Mayor Helen Putnam at the League of California Cities
Annual. Conference in San Francisco, September- °25 - 28,
1977, was adopted.
O� RENAME - FRATES ROAD. Planning Director Ronald Hall explained a request had
WITHIN CITY LIMITS been made to change the name'of one section of Frates
TO CADER LANE Road to Cader'.Lane.. This particular portion of Frates
\ RES # -7889 NCS .Road (southwest of Lakeville Street) already appears on
certain maps as Cadet Lane, and this produces a very
confusing situation,. He furthe:r.explained the other section of Frates Road
which is frequently used would not..be a part of the name change,. Mr. Hall
stated Sola Optical was in favor of the change, the request had.been presented
to the Planning Commission recently, and the Commission recommends the name be
changed to Cader Lane.
Councilman Hilligoss then inquired when the first name change had been pro-
posed.. `Mrs. 'Edna G Corder Budde the change had been instituted at the
time when this portion of the community was annexed to the City-. At that time,
the road was a private road chlreally::.hadano name,_? ?.but it was>'to be called.
Cader Lane although there was;no written agreement to that fact,.
The Mayor then opened the Public Hearing and Mr. C.-Glenn Head spoke. He said
that he had no. objections to the renaming,, but the property hounded by the
existing road ; name may have to be involved in changes of road titles. His
question was who would have to pay for the changes to be made on legal docu-
ments. City Attorney Larry Klose said there would be no need to change all of
the legal documents, but the City would have to inform the County'Recorder the
change had taken place. No'wri.tten .communication on the matter had_ been
received by the City Clerk's office, there were no further comments from the
audience and the Mayor closed the Public Hearing.
Resolution #7889 N.C.S. renaming Frates Road within the City limits to Cader
Lane, southwest of Lakeville Street, was, introduced by Councilman Cavanagh,
seconded by Councilman Perry, and adopted by 6 affirmative and 1 absentee
votes.
RESULTS OF BID
OPENING- -ONE GASOLINE.
MOTOR SCOOTER
1 RES #T 90 NCS
The bids ranged from $3
Chief 'Murphy recommends
Purchasing Officer Chuck Huffman explained that sealed
bids for' one new 19`77 or 1978 gasoline motor scooter
were opened on August 24, 1977. The bidders were Perin
Company, Inc.; Golden Bear Equipment Company`; Central.
Valley Golf and Industrial; and J. M. Lift Trucks,. '.Inc.
,691.66 to $4,219.85. Mr. Huffman further explained
that the low bid of Perin Company, .Inc. be accepted.
Councilman Cavanagh inquired if all companies had bid on the same 9pecifica-
tions,, and Mr. Huffman replied that they were uniform for all bidders. The
Mayor asked -what the delivery time would be, and Mr. Huffman explained that it
would be .60 days.
1
Resolution #7890 N.C.S. awarding contract for new 1977 or 1 gasoline motor
scooter for the Police, Department was introduced by Councilman Perry, seconded
by Councilman Bond, and" adopted by 6-affirmative and 1 absentee votes.
September 6', 1977
LETTER FROM SANTA ROSA Housing'C'oordinator Janie Warman stated the letter. F6 76.
AND REDEVELOPMENT received from James.K.. Bu Executive Director, Santa
AGENCY RE HOUSING Rosa Housing and Redevelopment Agency, was an inquiry
AUTHORITY PROGRAM as to whether the City of Petaluma wanted to continue
having Santa Rosa and the Sonoma County Housing Authority
act as the agent for Section 8 existing housing. Last year, the Council was
required to pass a resolution stating they wished to participate in the program,
but this year only the form letter is to be returned.
Councilman "Hilligoss inquired as to whether the City was actually making use of
this program. Ms. Warman replied approximately 75 people had leases last year,
and in the past, there have been 233 applicants. Many of these people are
still on the waiting.list.
Councilman Bond stated he was not sure of the advantage to Petaluma of partici-
pating in this program. Ms. Warman advised the Santa Rosa staff takes care
all administrative costs and handles the administration of the program. This
includes such things:as People Eligibility Criteria Lists and drawing up con-
tracts between tenants.and landlords. Councilman Bond then inquired if the.
City is contributing to the administrative cost, and Ms. Warman stated that the
City wasn't directly contributing to it,:.
Community Development and Services. Coordinator.Frank Gray then explained that
the taxpayers are paying for the administration of the Program. He further
explained that due to the number of unit's and the complexity of the Program, it
would be much more efficient for the;Santa Rosa Housing Authority to handle it.
At the present time, .it would :not be economically feasible for the City of
Petaluma to administer the Program.
It was the consensus of the Council to ,go ahead and send the form letter back
to the Santa Rosa Housing and Redevelopment Agency to participate in the
Housing Program.
LETTER FROM KENNETH Assistant City Manager David Breninger stated that Mr. F(J Sl
M. WIGHTMAN REGARDING Wigltman'''s letter reflects upon a problem which the
RESTORING LIGHTS AT City has, and that is the lighting at the Petaluma
PETALUMA PUBLIC Public Library. Four lights were installed a year ago
LIBRARY just outside the Library along the walkway and soon
thereafter we're vandalized. The decorative architec-
tural lights were made orf. glass with a large globe effect and were set on
standards. After- the vandalism occurred, in the interest of safety, the City
installed two regular large street lights that reach out.over the parking lot
and do light the area adequately. Mr: Breninger explained that the question is
do we,want to :replace the decorative lighting and how much money does the City
want to spend to make the vandal- proof. Mr. Wightman, in his letter, is
asking for Council support to move ahead with the decorative lighting. Mr.
Breninger further stated that another problem concerns our • energy situation.
If the City does go ahead and installs four vandal- proof: decorative lights,
will the reduction of energy availability in the winter time affect the use.of
the lights. Mayor Putnam then stated that Mr. Wightman has been an enthusiastic
supporter of the Library for many years, and the matter is under study presently
to find some kind of .lighting that will withstand vandalism.
Mr. Breninger added that as far as cost goes for the.lghting, it may take
between $800 to $1,000 to make the lighting damage-- p.roof..
Councilman Hilligoss suggested a study could be done and brought to light
regarding vandalism and how much it costs taxpayers in Petaluma. If citizens
are more aware of actual data figures, possibly something could be done to stop
vandalism.
After further discussion, Mayor Putnam stated that vandalism is a concern of
the individual, of bus'ine'ss and of the total community. The City could pos-
sibly get a handle on it, but it is a very extensive problem.
Mayor Putnam also asked Mr. Breninger to respond to Mr. Wightman's letter
regarding the lighting.
LETTER FROM BARRY D.
Community
Development and
Services
Coordinator Frank F 71 Q
PARKINSON REGARDING
Gray read
the letter from
Barry D.
Parkinson, Attorney U
DEDICATION OF WELL
for Aubrey
W. Sanderson,
and gave
some background
SITE
regarding
the situation.
Mr. Gray
stated the City',s
September 6, 1977
LETTER FROM BARRY D.
Water Emergency Ordinance requires that when a develop -
PARKINSON
ment.takes place, an alternate source of water must be
DEDICATION OF WELL
provided.. In this particular case, the land was being
SITE
annexed to the City of Petaluma.. At the present time,
(Continued)
annexation maps have not been filed with the- Local
Agency Formation Commission because one of the con-
ditions before LAFCO can certify the annexation, is assurance o:f an adequate
amount of'water to serve the property. In light of the existing emergency
situation, LAFCO would'
be satisfied if a well site is dedicated, but not
necessarily'drilled, now. Mr. Gray ,stated the request before the Council tonight
was• that Mr. Sanderson
.
be relieved of the drilling requirement and have the
future landowner responsible for the well site.. The land will not be developed'
immediately, and if it
rains this Fall, there will be no water emergency
situation and' no well 'would need to be built. Mr. Gray stated the problem
before the Council is would the Council be satisfied that future property
owners would drill the
well, or should the original .condition remain -on * the.
property..
Mr..Barry Par.kinson'stated this parcel of land is approximately 20 °acres and.
has been part, of a bond assessment district for many year-s. Mr. 'SAnderson, has.
pai through the assessment proc'es "s, for the installation•of water mains and
utilities. At this point, only annexation of the land to the .City is being
considered. Mr. Parkinson questioned 'the need for the dedication of a well
site, stating if it rains this winter, ,a well may never be necessary. At this
point, it is not certain what type of ,development will take place on the pro
perty;. - Mr. Parkinson suggested when development takes place and, the need for
the amount of water is known, that restrictions and requirements be made as
part of the development process.
City Attorney Larry Klose stated.the City has control to assure an adequate
supply of water for proposed development of land. He further stated,, in the
interest o -f equal_ protection for persons annexing land -'into the,City, a -revi-
s on.should be made to th'e general policy of the Council regarding annexations
to provide for well dedication during the development process rather than at
the time of annexation.
After :further discussion of the matter, City Attorney Larry Klose suggested
that possibly the Council should consider a policy change as fa,r a 's_ the annex-
ation procedure. Mayor Putnam asked to have a reso.lution,prepared for the
Council`s consideration on September 19, 1977.
Councilman Bond 'inquired if the Council would then be taking away °the well
dedication procedure,. Mr. Klose -indicated the dedication procedure would take
place during the development period rather than annexation,. Consequently,
annexation of land could take place without.dedication of a well site, but the
well would be required when the land is developed.
Councilman Harberson asked if this annexation was different than other annexa-
ton_s, and Mr. Gray responded that, others had complete development; :on the land
and everything was being annexed at one time. This is a diff'erent.si:tuation.
Mayor Putnam closed the discussion by asking that the policy change be placed
before - the Council so they could examine it very carefully in the interest of
protecting tt;e City's rights the person trying to annex his land and other`
property in the same situation. Mr. Gray further stafe'd -he would check with
the Local Agency Formation Commission to be sure the policy would meet with
their criteria.
n SET DATE FOR APPEAL
�J , d- OF.DENIAL OF REZONING
1650 ELY BLVD. NORTH
GOLDRICH KEST, AND
ASSOCIATES'
RES #7890A 'NCS
ORD 41263 NCS
The Deputy City Clerk read the letter from'Mr. Robert
Hirsch, Goldrich, Kest and Associates Mayor Putnam
explained that the only thing before the - Council to-
night is s,et.ting the date to hear the appeal. City
Attorney Larry Klose added the Zoning Ordinance does
not require that this type.of matter be heard at a
Public Hearing. The appeal must be heard.at.a public
meeting, but not necessarily by a Public Hearing.
Although the Council will be discussing adoption of a
new ordinance, the procedure is different than most
September 6 1977
SET DATE FOR APPEAL
OF DENIAL OF kffZONING
1650 ELY.BLUD. NORTH
GOLDRICH, ,KEST, &
others because it iarajspeeial type of Planned Unit
Development Ordinance; and, therefore, special rules of
appeal would apply:
ASSOCIATES` Councilman Bond stated, nevertheless, he would want to
RES #7890A NCS be sure the Council would allow public input on the
ORD #1263 NCS date o'f the appeal :. Mayor Putnam agreed that the
(Continued) matter is of great community -interest, and certainly
the Council would.want the input of the citizens. She
further stated the appeal hearing would be held on the 19th of September.
Resolution. #7890A N.C.S. setting appeal.hearing for appeal of Goldrich, Kest
and Associates regarding rezoning property located behind 1650 Ely Blvd. North,
was adopted by 6 affirmative and 1 absentee votes.
Ordinance #1263 N.C.S. amending Zoning, Ordinance #1072 N.C.S., by-reclassifying
a portion of real property located at the northwest corner of Ely Blvd. and
East Washington Street, Petaluma, from R- 1- 6,.500 to Planned Unit Development,
was ordered published by .affirmative, 1 negative, and 1 absentee votes.
Councilman Cavanagh voted "'no ".
RECESS The Council recessed at 9:05.p.m., and reconvened at
9:15 p.m.
APPROVE INSTALLATION
OF CHAIN LINK FENCING
ADJACENT TO.GREENBRIAR
SQ. PROFESSIONAL CTR.
RES #7891 NCS
wood, and starting fir(
Community Development and Services Coordinator Frank F1 I /
Gray read a,letter from Mr. T. J. Sopinski, Property I
Manager, Young America Homes. He also explained that
complaints have been received from Mrs. Kerrigan re-
garding vandalism occurring on the Young America Homes
property by children kicking the fence in, taking the
>_s in the creek channel.
Mr. Gray stated there definitely does appear to be vandalism at the site, not
only from the developer's side, but also from the City parkway. Mr. Gray
suggested two solutions to the problem. One is that the Police Department
patrol the area more often; and the other is that Young America secure the
property by completing development of the project. Mr. Gray further suggested
that the Council give the developer permission to put in chain link fencing as
long as the area with the fencing has some type of landscaping.. Mr. Gray also
brought up the matter of financing. He explained financing could be available
from the Park Development fund, but it is the Council's decision whether they
would want to expend the money. Councilman Perry said vandalism occurs very
frequently; and, if the City helps this developer put up chain link fencing,
there will be no end to the expense in the future.
Mr. Sopinski stated he agreed with Mr. Gray that a chain link fence with land-
scaping would be the best idea for the area. He further stated no vandalism
has occurred in the chain link "fence area further down, but along Greenbriar
Apartments there has been a tremendous amount of vandalism to that fence.
At the conclusion of the discussion, it was the consensus of the Council to
permit the installation of chain link fencing with no participation in the cost
by the City at this time.
Resolution #7891 N.C.S. approving installation of chain link fencing in place
of wood fencing adjacent to Greenbriar Square Professional Center and the City
bicycle path,, was introduced by Councilman Hilligoss „seconded by.Council'man
Harberson, and "approved by 6 affirmative and 1 absentee votes.
CITY MANAGER "S REPORTS
E.D.P. CONFERENCE City Manager ;Robert Meyer reminded the Council about
the City's Environmental Design Plan Evaluation Con-
ference to be held on Saturday, September 17, and he asked that the Council
V618?
O?
ad-
vise his Secretary how many could attend.
September 6, 1977
AL COLLINS DAY Mr. Meyer mentioned a letter had been received inviting
the Council, to participate in Al Collins Day on Sunday,
September 11, at Cader Ranch Mr. Meyer explained he had talked to the Police
Chief- regarding this event because there will be a slight traffic ; problem
getting in and out.of the ranch.
MAYORS' AND Mr. Meyer also reminded the Council that there wo,u'ld
COUNCILMEN'•S`,MEET,ING a Mayors' :and Councilmen's Meeting Thiar;sday ,night,
September `8, in Sebastopol. The guest speaker would be
the President,of the League of California Cities, Mayor
Helen Putnam.
t 0 "I" ;ST. ANNEXATION Mr. Meyer. informed the Council th`e "I" Street Annexa
C) tion No.. 2 was approved by LAFCO Thursday, September 1,
1977.
REPORT ON LUCCHESI Councilman Hillgoss staged the,Lucchesl Park.Tennis
PARK -S COURTS Courts will soon be ready for:use. She sugge "seed the
City hold a dedication ceremony Sep;;tember 19 'and that
the court& be opened for public play on September 20,
.19,77.
Councilman Harbe -rson said that it looked to him as if the courts. 'had been
finished for some time'. Councilman Hilligoss 'advised the poles and nets
,haven't been completed and the res`trooms are being redone after having been
vandalized. Also., court surface has already been vandalized and.re;paired.
. POS`SIBLE , MEETING WITH Councilman Harberson said he had spoken.wi h State
SENATOR`,BEHR & COUNCIL Senator Peter Behr last week, and he is 'interested in
sitting down with the Council and discussing in par-
ticular, legislation affecting :cities regarding the property tax.. Councilman
HArb,erson said he hoped the Council would be able - to.:get to:ge,ther with the
Senator and discus's certain items with him. The Mayor added possibly Mr. Meyer
and the staff could'make the necessary arrangements.
REPORT RE BOARD OF Councilman Hilligoss,said that-she had attended the
SUPERVISORS 'MEETING Board of Supervisors Meeting last Thursday when. they
adopted the tax rate. She said that the meeting was
very cut and dried. and,.there was no discussion on :the
matter. y'
APPOINT MEMBERS TO The Council chose ni =ne members to. represent the busi
RES.IDENTIAL'D,EVELOP- ness or professional and citizens at large for the east
V MEAT EVALUATION BOARD and west, for the Residential Development Evaluation
19T$; 79 CONSTRUCTION Board for the '197$ -79 construction;ye'ar, The: three
YEAR persons chosen from the business or professional sec
RES #789.2 NCS tion were Ernest Vivas, Sam Shafer., and William S gurdsen,.
The persons chosen for the at -large category were:, from
the East, Pat Hebert., Kenneth Spfsak and Linda Hepp.. From the were
Robert Koenitzer, Lo -is Kana and Gillian Richards„ The two persons chosen from
-the City Council were James L. Harberson and Jack W. Cavanagh,, Jr..
:City Manager Robert' Meyer asked Planning Director Ron Hall when `the first
meeting would' most likely be, and Mr:.. Hall answered as soon as the staff could
be ready with reports, probably the second or third week of' September.
Resolution #7892 N.C.S. appointing certain persons to the Residential Devel-
opment Evaluation Board for 1978 -79 construction year., was.ntroduce'd by
Councilman. Hilligoss, seconded by Councilman Bond, and approved by 6 affir-
mative and l absentee votes.
REPORT ON LUC'CHESI Recreation Director 'Jim Raymond explained that it
PARK. DEVELOPMENT appears grant funding possibilities for Lucchesi Park
are remote. He also discussed the cost estimates and
aiS
September 6, 1977
REPORT ON LUCCHESI said that the-one problem is where will the total
PARK DEVELOPMENT financing come from for the project. At this time, Mr.
(Continued) Raymond would'sugge'st that the Recreation Commission
review the total proj ect';, in;corporate the Lucchesi Park
project into a two -year program, and possibly two -year funding, and then have
the Recreation Commission come back to the Council with a positive approach to,
the development of Lucchesi Park. if this.suggestion is followed, then the
Commission could offer input to the Council before the Council must decide what
they want to do. The community needs a park with recreational facilities, such
as Lucchesi Park. Mr. Raymond believes, if the Council is going to make a
commitment to develop Lucchesi Park, then the commitment should be a total one.
City Manager Robert Meyer stated he is not completely convinced that the City
can't do part of the project. He explained if the 'City would wait and try to
put the whole project together, we might lose the whole thing. Granted, it
would be more desirable to do the entire project, but there are•certain things
on the outline that could be done with a certain amount of money. Mayor Putnam
agreed with Mr. Raymond's recommendation that the Recreation Commission should
review the development as a total project and make recommendations to the
Council.
GRANT OUTSIDE WATER Community Development and Services Coordinator Frank F S9 3
CONNECTION= -JOHN & Gray explained that John and Effie Ruano were before
EFFIE RUANO the Council tonight requesting an outside water con -
RES X67893 NCS nec ion. The Ruanoa have an existing 21 -foot well
which has gone dry, and they are requesting permission
to hook into the City's water system. Mr. Gray explained the options open to
the Council in this "situation are to give permission to the Ruano's to hook
into the water system or to require them to dig 'a deeper well.
Mr. and Mrs. Ruano spoke to the Council, and Mrs. Ruano said that a neighbor
uses a great deal.of water on his flowers' and toward the end of the evening
they have very little and sometimes no water. Mr. Gray agreed that the well is
considered dry. He further expla'ine'd the Ruano's were aware of the $120.00
hook -up fee approved by the Council at this meeting.
Resolution X67893 N.G.S. granting one outside water connection for A.P. 20 -040-
29 (John and Effie Ruano) was introduced by Councilman Perry, seconded by
Councilman Harberson, and adopted by 6 affirmative and 1 absentee votes.
APPROVE DELETION'OF Planning Director Ron Hall showed a viewfoil of the
CONDITION X612 ON property and explained that a.request was made by Debra
TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION Home's, Inc. to have Condition 412 of the Tentative Map
MAP-- WESTRIDGE UNITS deleted. The condition affects the rear yards of Lots
X63 AND #4 71, 72, and 73 of Unit 663, and requires retaining walls
RES X67894 NCS for those lots. The Chief Building Inspector and City
Engineer required at least a.four -foot minimum`- the
building edge before the slope actually takes pl =ace- Debra Homes: has amended
the grading plan and ,softened the slope to eliminate the requirement for retain-
ing walls. Mr. Hall explained this is a better arrangement for all the people
involved because, by minimizing the grading, the area is more level and there
is no need for a six =foot retaining wall. he `Engineering and Building Depart-
ments see no problem with the new plan, and the Planning Commission recommends
approval.
Resolution .#7894 N.C.S. approving deletion of Condition X612 on Tentative Subdi-
vision Map Approval for Westridge Unit X63 and #4, was introduced by Councilman
Bond, seconded by Councilman Harberson, and approved by 6 affirmative and 1
absentee votes.
GRANTING MODIFICATIONS Planning Director Ronald' Hall review the request by F5 a,'
TO REQUIREMENTS OF Leland Lindebeck for modification to the Subdivision
SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE Ordinance for property located at 12 Vallejo Street.
12 VALLEJO STREET Mr. Lindebeck is requesting;modification for lot sizes
RES X67895 NCS from 65 -foot wide to 50 -foot wide, and from 6,500
square foot to 5,000 square foot. Mr. Hall explained
the subject property is surrounded by residential development, and the appli-
cation by Mr. Lindebeck is in keeping with.the rest of the neighborhood. It is
a simple split of property after modification has been approved. There has
been no testimony by the public, and the Planning Commission recommends approval
of the modification.
September 6 1977 ,
GRANTING MODIFICATIONS Councilman Hilligoss agreed the lots in that area are
TO REQUIREMENTS OF small and this modification would conform.
SUBDIV'IS16N 'ORDINANCE
r2 VALLEJO STREET Resolution #7895 N.C.S., .gr-aftt,ilng certain modifications
RES #7895 N:CS to :the.re imposed by the Subdivision Ordi-
(Continued) nance of this .City relating to property at 1.2 Vallejo
Street, Petaluma, was introduced by Councilman Hilligoss,
seconded by Councilman'Perry, and approved'by 6 af,firma =_.
tive and 1 abstentee votes.
ORDINANCE AMENDING
PETALUMA MUNICIPAL
CODE TO. 'PROVIDE' A_
QUORUM 'OF THE
RECREATION„ MUSIC &
PARKS 'COMMISSION SHALL
B , E 'FOUR MEMBERS
An ordinance amending Section 2.12.050 of the Petaluma
Municipal Code to provide, -that a quorum of the R'ec-
rea,t on, Music :and 'Parks Commission shall be 'four'
members, was i- ntroduc'ed at the meeting of August 22,.
1977, by Councilman Hilligoss and s,econded'by Council-
man Bond. The ordinance was approved by 6 affirmative
and 1 absentee votes.
AUTHORIZE MAYOR TO Resolution #7896 N.C.S. authorizing Mayor to accept
ACCEPT $90,0_.00 EDA $90,000 ;grant from the conomic Development Adminis,tra-
GRANT tion to provide assistance for renovation of Carnegie
RES #7,896 NCS Library-was introduced by. Cou- ncilman Hill- igoss, seconded
by Councilman Perry, and adopted by 6 affli''mative and 1
absentee votes.
ADJOURNMENT . There 'being no further business to come be,for:e the
Council, the meeting was adjourned at 10:,32 p.m, In
memory of Fire Chief Joseph Ellwood to an,Executive
:Session; and to immediately follow the P.C.D.C. meeting
on September 12, at 4.:00 p.m.
Mayor
At,te.st:'
Cit Clerk