Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 05/06/1974i Council Meeting Attendance Invocation Approval of Minutes MINUTES OF MEETING OF CITY COUNCIL PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA May 6, 1974 Regular meeting of the City City of Petaluma was called Mayor Putnam at the hour of p.m. Council of the to order by 7:30 o'clock Present: Councilmen Brunner, Cavanagh, Jr., Daly, Harberson, Mattei, *Perry, Jr., and Mayor Putnam. Absents None. *Councilman Perry, Jr., arrived at 7:45 O'clock p.m. The invocation was given by the Reverend Henry Rankin, Two Rock Valley Presbyterian Church. The minutes of April 15, 1974, were approved as recorded. Agenda Item #5 Ordinance #1.137 N.C.S. amending Title 15, Re Water Recon- Chapter. 15.112, Sections 15.12.090 and nection Fees 15.12.100 thereof; to establish reconnection Ord #1137 NCS fees was ordered published. Agenda Item #6 Ordinance #1133 N.C.S. authorizing the leaseg� Lease -- Federal of real property to the Federal Aviation Aviation Administration for the period beginning Administration July.1, 1974, and ending June 30, 1975, for Ord #1133 NCS the sum of $5,375 per year was adopIted. (Re (Second Reading) Water Pollution Control Facilities Project area.) CONSENT CALENDAR A motion was made by Councilman Harberson and seconded by Councilman Mattei adopting the Consent Calendar, Agenda Items #1 through #7. Motion carried unanimously. Agenda Item #1 Petaluma Area Chamber of Commerce, Inc., �r Chamber of Commerce Annual Report for 1973 -74 submitted and filed. Agenda Item #2 Resolution #6590 N.C.S. endorsing Proposition Proposition #1 #1 (California Park Bond Issue on the June 4, �— Res #6590 NCS 1974, ballot) was adopted. Agenda Item #3 Resolution #6591 N.C.S. awarding contract Caulfield Lane (to C. R. Fedricks, Inc.) in accordance with Overcrossing plans and specifications entitled "Caulfield �— Approaches Lane Overcrossing Approaches" was adopted. Res #6591 NCS Agenda Item #4 Ordinance #1136 N.C.S. authorizing the lease Lease W /Santa Fe of real property to the City of Petaluma by Pomeroy, Inc. Santa Fe- Pomeroy, Inc., for the purpose of Ord #1136 NCS temporary ponding of waste sludge from the sewer plant for the two -year period July 1, 1973,; .through_ June 30, 1975, and thereafter on a month -to -month basis was ordered posted. Agenda Item #5 Ordinance #1.137 N.C.S. amending Title 15, Re Water Recon- Chapter. 15.112, Sections 15.12.090 and nection Fees 15.12.100 thereof; to establish reconnection Ord #1137 NCS fees was ordered published. Agenda Item #6 Ordinance #1133 N.C.S. authorizing the leaseg� Lease -- Federal of real property to the Federal Aviation Aviation Administration for the period beginning Administration July.1, 1974, and ending June 30, 1975, for Ord #1133 NCS the sum of $5,375 per year was adopIted. (Re (Second Reading) Water Pollution Control Facilities Project area.) May 6, 1974 Agenda Item #7 Letter dated April 2, 1974, from Mike Tyrrell Mike Tyrrell -- volunteering to do research on the City's ----- Growth Case growth case, submitted and filed. This letter was referred to attorney Robert Anderson, the City's counsel on the case. Agenda By consensus, the Council approved to move - Agenda Item #12 regarding the Bicentennial Logo Contest awards for consideration at this time. Bicentennial Logo Ud? F Mr. Ken Colin, Chairman of the Bicentennial Contest Award Committee, appeared before the Council with `- -- the awards to*be presented for the Bicenten- nial Logo Contest: He introduced,Mr. David Voss of the Sierra National Bank. Mayor Putnam; with the assistance .of 'Mr. Voss, made the following awards: Bronze medal- (third prize) to Rob Hilligoss; silver'medal (,second prize) to Diane Stander ; $ 100 savings bond (first prize) to Jaki Hinman. Mayor Putnam appropriately congratulated each award recipient on behalf of the City Council. The winners' designs were also presented for viewing. Mr. Colin also announced tha the first prize was donated by the Bank of America; the silver and.bronze medals by the Sierra National Bank. He added that the first prize winner's design will appear as the logo.on. the Committee's letterhead and will be the identity for the local Bicentennial activities. Agenda Mayor Putnam announced that Agenda Items #9, #20, and # - 2;4 were deleted Council con- sideration at a later date. Executive Session The Council retired to an executive.session at 7:45 o'clock p.m.,.to consider the C..I.A. versus City of Petaluma case (growth control . - suit) with attorney Robert Anderson. The Council reconvened at 8:30 o'clock p.m. Agenda A motion was made by Councilman .Daly .,and seconded -by Councilman Perry, Jr., to move Agenda Item #:29 concerning the appeal of the C.I.A. suit for.consideration at this time. Motion carried unanimously. C..I.A. vs-City "Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law" ,31F of Petaluma.Suit and "Declaratory Judgment and Permanent (Growth Control) Injunction," both documents of District Res #6592 NCS Judge Lloyd H. Burke in the matter of C.I.A. of Sonoma County, et al, vs City of Petaluma, et al, submitted and filed. Re Council consideration to a_ppeal.the Court's. decision, Councilman Cavanagh,, Jr., read statement in opposition to the appeal procedure. In his statement, Council- man Cavanagh said that since the hearing ,of 1 May 6, 1974 C.I.A. vs City the case on January 14 -18, 1974, by the U.S. of Petaluma Suit District Court Judge.Burke, he has had few (Growth Control) opinions expressed to him from citizens not Res #6592 NCS - directly involved with the opinion; but in (continued) fact, he has sought opinions. He felt that the so called "Petaluma Plan" resulted in enormous amounts of adverse publicity to our City. He disagreed with many of the findings of fact as presented by the Judge in his written order, but agreed with others. He pointed out the fact that to get to this point of time represents over $35,000 of the taxpayers' dollars and the next uncertain step of appeal would cost approximately $25,000 as a starter and the appeal would be long, costly, and frustrating. It was his opinion to forget about an appeal and take a more intelligent approach to the growth situation and govern Petaluma the best way possible. Following opinions expressed by a number of Council members to appeal the case, Resolu- tion #6592 N.C.S. directing the taking of appeal from the adverse decision in the case of C.I.A., et al, vs City of Petaluma, et al, was introduced by Mayor Putnam, seconded by Councilman Perry, Jr., and adopted by 6 affirmative and l negative votes. Council- man Cavanagh, Jr., voted "no." The following communications were reported received in support of appealing the Court decision: Letter dated May 3, 1974, from Mrs. Burna Bryant, 15 Seventh Street, Petaluma; Chamber of Commerce Resolution #40; and letter dated-May 6, 1974, from Bill Kortum, 180 Ely Road, Petaluma. EIR -- Washington Washington Professional Park Environmental - �S Professional Park Impact Report (preliminary), dated January Res #6593 NCS 25, 1974, prepared by Applied Science and Resources Planning, Inc., submitted and filed. Planning Commission Resolution #9 -74, dated April 2, 1974, recommending to the City Council the certification of the Environ- mental Impact Report - relating to the Washing- ton Professional Park and copy of Planning Commission minutes, dated April 2, 1974, submitted and filed. Addendum, dated April 19, 1974, "Response to Comments on the Draft EIR, Washington Professional Park" prepared by Applied Science and Resources Planning, Inc., sub- mitted and filed. Mr. Dennis Boehlje, Associate Planner, presented a location map of the parcel involved. 'He reported that the EIR was certified by the Planning Commission as being objective and.accurate and that Applied Science and Resources Planning, Inc., supplied information in its addendum May 6, 1974 E•IR-- Washington Professional Park Res #6593 NCS (continued) clarifying several questionable points raised by the Planning Commission. This being the time to hear protests and /or comments on the subject E.IR,. the Mayor declared the public hearing open. The City Clerk announced that no written communica- tions were received; and as no one appeared to voice any objections or comments, the public hearing was closed. Resolution #6593 N.C.S. certifying the Env;ironmertal Impact Report for Washington Professional Park Development was introduced by Counc °ilman Brunner, seconded by Council - man Mattei, and adopted by 7 affirmative votes. 3 Warning, and Regulatory Signs, Etc. Res #6:594 NCS Notice of "Warning and Regulatory Signs and Related Equipment was duly posted and published. Report dated May 2, 1974, from David L. Smith, Intern, of the four bids received at•the bid opening April 18., 1974, for the signs and equipment, submitted and filed. The following bids were received: Name Amount Vulcan Signs and Stampings, Inc. $5,982.37 Western Highway Products, Inc. $6,106.71 Bowman. Industries, Inc. $6,649.32 Hawkins- Hawkins Company, Inc. $8,067.06 Memo dated May 3; 1974, from Roy Kelly, Public Works Superintendent, recommending that the Council accept the low'bid of Vulcan Signs and Stampings, Inc., submitted and filed. Concerning the matter of City personnel making street name signs, Mr. Smith noted that although the Street Division has the capability of making the signs at a cost. comparable with the low bid., the department does not have the.manpower to complete this task. Resolution for street other - vela Councilman Harberson; votes'. #6594 N.C.S. awarding contract warning and regulatory signs and ted equipment was introduced by Daly, seconded by Councilman and adopted by 7 affirmative Greenbriar Unit #2, Letter dated,April 1_9, 1974, from William 3W r- Phase I,. Mueller of Young America Homes requesting Subdivision reduction of Neighborhood Park and Beauti- Res #6595 NCS fication Fees for Greenbriar Subdivision, submitted and filed. Report dated May 3, 1974, from Frank Gray, Director of Community Development, on Young America.Home.s' -request re Greenbriar Subdi- vision and* "Analysis of Greenbriar Subdivision May 6, 1974 u Greenbriar Unit #2; Park Dedication and-In-lieu Fees Calculations Phase I, and the Neighborhood Park and Beautification Subdivision Fund Calculations," submitted and filed. It Res #65.95 -NCS was Mr. Gray's opinion that the maximum fees (continued) should be collected for the Neighborhood Park and Beautification Fund to be used for the development of the linear park adjacent to the subdivision. In his report, Mr. Gray noted that the developer does not propose to develop the 20 -foot linear park strip along the Washing- ton Creek flood control channel adjacent to this project. Is � Report, dated May 3, 1974, from Jim Raymond, Recreation Director, on Young America's request re Greenbriar Subdivision and recom- mending against a reduction in the Park fees, submitted and filed. Mr. Raymond pointed out that the fees are needed to improve the linear park. 1 Mr. Jon Joslyn and Mr. Jack O'Neel of Young America Homes appeared before the Council on behalf of Mr. Mueller to discuss details of the request for reducing the fees in question. They presented the following facts in support of the reduction: Offered the use of the recreation facility to be constructed in the subdivision for public services, such as polling places, meetings by civic organizations, etc., absorbed the entire cost of improving Park Lane at no expense to the City (City being -the adjacent land owner), dedicated the land for the street, dedicated property along Washington Creek Washington Creek Bridge one -half of the cost. was due to offset some improving all of Park the bridge. In asking they also pointed out was-indicated to them a credit would be due Lane. and constructed the contributing over They felt that credit of the costs for Lane and for building for the reduction, that at one time it -by City officials that for improving Park Following some discussion and consideration of-facts, Resolution #6595 N.C.S. reducing Neighborhood Park and Beautification Fees for Greenbriar #2, Phase I, Subdivision was introduced by Councilman Perry, Jr., seconded by Councilman Mattei, and DEFEATED by the following vote: 1 Ayes: Councilmen Brunner and Cavanagh, Jr. Noes: Councilmen Daly, Harberson, Mattei, Perry, Jr., and Mayor Putnam. Claims and Bills Resolution #6596 N.C.S. approving claims and Res #6596 NCS bills #318 to #421, inclusive, and #2227 to #2241, inclusive, was introduced by Councilman Mattei, seconded by Councilman Harberson, and adopted by 7 affirmative votes. - - � � r May 6, 1974 Program of Service City Manager Robert Meyer presented the 1974 -75 Program of Service for 1974 -75. He sug- gested that Council members review the report for discussion in early June. Outside Sewer Fees City Manager Robert Meyer referred to a breakdown of proposed annual charges and conversion into monthly charges based on the minimum 1964 annual charge of $75 per single -family dwelling as a guideline for_ Council consideration to establish revised outside sewer charges as ordered February 28, 1974,, by Judge Mahan of the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Sonoma in the case of Harold W. Wojciechowski,'e,t al, vs City of Petaluma,, et al,_ Mr. Meyer asked for Council direction so that an ordinance c.an be prepared and become, effective on July 1st for. the next outside sewer billing. Copy of the City Man.ager's report on the breakdown of the proposed outside sewer fees, submitted and filed. Copy of Judge Mahan's order submitted and filed.. Some discussion followed and in regard.to a question raised, it was the City Attorney's opinion that the law permits charging more for sewer services outside of the City limits.than for services inside of the City. The following addressed the Council regarding the issue: Leonard Svinth, 1541 Mountain View Avenue; Brand Johnson, 10 Highland Road; Harold Wojcie.chowski, 831 Madison Street; Rich;ard'Harm, 454 Purrington Road,. Upon conclusion, the City Attorney was directed to preare an ordinance with blank spaces for the .charge_s. for Council considera- tion at the May 20th meeting. X37 T Microfilm Equipment. Report dated May 3, 1.974,, from David L. Res #6597 NCS Smith, Administrative Intern, and concurred by Police Chief Larry Higgins, City Clerk Lillian Nommsen,_ and :Building Official Henry Anderson explaining that after resea >rch of the available products from var'iousmicrofilm companies, it was concluded that 3M Company offers the only system that is completely consistent with the City's needs,- submitted and filed. The staff recommended in the report that the Council authorize purchase of the equipment from 3M Company for a total sum of $1 plus freight and applicable taxes. Discussion followed and in answer to a question raised regarding City Charter Section 68 (requiring that public works and purchases to be done and made by contract, after calling for bids, when such work and purchases exceed $3,000), it was the City r May 6, 1974 165 Microfilm.Equipment Attorney's opinion that in view of the Res #6597 NCS report explaining the special needs, it is (continued) not necessary to go to competitive bidding because demands for the system required for the users would not meet the other manu- facturers' equipment. Under these circum- stances, competitive bidding is not required. Resolution #6597 N.C.S. authorizing the purchase of microfilm equipment from 3M was introduced by Councilman Cavanagh, Jr., seconded by Councilman Brunner, and adopted by 7 affirmative votes. Intra -City Bus City Manager Robert Meyer reported that the Feasibility Study Intra -city Bus Feasibility Study has been received and will be presented by the consultant, Kaiser Engine.er;s, at the May 20th Council meeting pending confirmation of the date by the Director of Public Works. Population - -City City Manager Robert Meyer reported that for of Petaluma the purposes of SB 90 and according to a report-of the State of California, the -- official population of Petaluma as of January 1, 1974, is 31,150. "Population of Sonoma County cities -- January 1, 1973 and 1974" prepared by the City Manager, submitted and filed. Mr. Meyer briefly reviewed the statistics shown thereon. Cost of Election -- City Manager Robert Meyer reported to the '51s v June 12, 1973 Council that the cost of the June 12, 1973, Municipal Election was $16,809.16. Census City Manager Robert Meyer also reported that after 1975, the State of California will no longer certify any population for gas tax purposes; and in order t6 obtain a certification, an actual count will have to be made. The City's share for a County -wide count will be $10,948 plus 15/20% overhead. "I" Street at _ City Manager Robert Meyer reported that Olive Street Director of Public Works David Young has Reconstruction submitted an application to the State Department Project of Transportation requesting funds under the Highway Safety Act of 1973 - -Safer Roads Demonstration Program -- covering reconstruction of "I" Street at Olive Street for an estimated amount of $35,800. Revenue City Manager Robert Meyer reported that Sharing Revenue Sharing Projects for 1974 -75 are to Projects be filed by the Council and received in Washington, D.C., by June 24, 1974. The total amount of the City's entitlement is $324,389. The procedure requires holding a public hearing which is to be published in the local newspaper. In order to meet the deadline, the Council will have to officially act no later than June 10, 1974. May 6, 1974 Mayors.' and City Manager Robert Meyer reviewed the Councilmen's speakers scheduled at the :subject meeting on Association of Thursday, May '9, 1974, in Sonoma. The Mayor. Sonoma County and all Councilmen, except Councilman Mattei, Meeting indicated to the City Manager that they would be - attending the meeting.. Taxicab Rates Letter dated May 4, 1974, from Myrel A. Moss proposing an increase in taxicab rate's submitted-and filed.- Councilman Cavanagh, Jr., Chairman of the Council Taxicab Committee, informed the Council that the Committee has not met-on the -proposal as yet. Mr. Leo Nielsen df the Taxicab Company was present to briefly discuss the proposal. By gener :al concurrence of the Council, it was agreed that the Committee review and study the proposal for a recommendation thereon to the Council on May 20, 1974. Park Development At Councilman Brunner's request, the!Mayor Fund directed City Manager Robert Meyer and Director of Community Development Frank Gray to explore the matter of developing an amendment to the Park Development Fund Ordinance (the ordinance which sets forth a reduction in fees when a developer provides a recreation facility) to allow for credit when negotiation is made on other improve- ments being furnished such as in a case reported by Mr. Joslyn of Young America Homes earlier in the meeting. Petaluma Councilman Perry, Jr., reported that a Cooperative program is being studied with the Petaluma Creamery Truck Cooperative Creamery regarding the matter Parking of parking their trucks on the streets. Councilmari.CavanagY, Jr., added that a serious accident- occurred in the vicinity of the Creamery Friday evening at Upham and English Streets due to poor sight distance at the intersection. Environmental Director of Community Development Frank Gray Quality reported to the Council that currently the Act of 1970 guidelines - adopted by the City in relation Res #6598 NCS to the California Environmental Quality Act provide-that-projects that are administerial, categor•ica•lly-- exempt, or an emergency have 18.0 day's statute of limitations. The amend- ment to the CEQA Act provides that if -the City will file a notice of exemption with the County Clerk, that this statute of -limi= tations can be reduced to 35 days. Mr. Gray stated that the proposed resolution covers the ,modf icatIons to the City' s guidelines to provide for the 35 day .limita- tion. Resolution #6598 N.C.S. amending Resolution #6533 N,.C.S.-to provided for notices of exemption was introduced by .Councilman Matte.i, seconded : by Counilman Daly, and 1 adopted by 7 affirmative votes. May 6, 1974 Residential Director of Community Development Frank Gray Development presented "Priority List for Processing Applications Developments," with schedule attached, "Minimum Processing Time," for Council approval, submitted and filed. He pointed out that the list sets forth the date of previous and'the date of each ap- plication's state of readiness prepared in accordance with Council direction to process applications in the following order: (1) Site design; (2) final maps; (3) tentative maps; (4) rezoning; and (5) total procedure. However, he noted one deviation-- Greenbriar, Phases #1 and #2, and U. S. Equities' Alder - wood Subdivision, Phases #2 and #3, are being processed ahead of Debra Homes because of the state of readiness. He also noted that the minimum processing schedule will be flexible in accordance with the applicant's state of readiness. In response to Councilman Daly, Mr. Gray stated that the priority list does not require any action by the Planning Commis - sion, but only the approval of the Council. Mr. Gray also pointed out that annexations are not included in the list of priorities and the Council concurred that annexation applications will only be processed when the Council decides to entertain such action after the completion of the items on the subject priority list. The Council also concurred with approval of the priority list and schedule of minimum processing as submitted by the staff. Penngrove Area Re: Council instruction January 28, 1974, Sewer Service to Director of Public Works David Young and Director of Public Works of Sonoma County Don Head to investigate a method of providing sewer service to the Penngrove area - -Mr. James Gossett, the County's consulting engineer, addressed the Council on the subject. He explained the proposal of connecting to the City's federally financed trunk sewer (City's Madison Street trunk line) with a 10 -inch sewer line to handle the ultimate growth of the small area in- cluded in the Regional Water Quality Control Board's septic tank ban (Cease and Desist Order to ban septic tanks by October 1976) and to provide a firm limitation on the capacity that the pipe would carry. He stated further that the ultimate capacity of this line would service 2,200 people. An alternative to the proposal of connecting to Petaluma would be to construct a small treatment plant in the Penngrove area with a capacity to handle the existing population of 500 with an ultimate capacity of 2,200 people to serve the area defined in the Regional Board's septic tank ban. May 6, 1974 Penngrove Area Mr. Head also addressed the Council_ regarding Sewer Service the health hazards.i_n the Penngrove area; (continued) and,_i.t was.his recommendation that the, service be provide,d Petaluma in order to conform.to the Regional Plan. In discussing the proposal, the question was'raised by the Council of the City's . legal position (,relative to the Court's ruling on-the growth control suit) of accepting the,proposal to provide outside sewer service to the Penngrove area and then the City.refuse to annex land adjacent to the City,in,order, to control growth. It was the City Attorney's opinion that if the City determined. not to annex areas for a period . of time based upon lack of capacity of the present sewer plan and for .other reasons, but in the interim period Penngrove has been given service, the City cannot refuse at a later date an annexation as this could lead to more complicated litigation. He further,added that he appreciated the health .hazarrd approach,, but the implications of the „present suit and the implications of the possibilities as set forth in the judge's Findings and Conclusions and Order, it would be unwise,at the present time for the C.ity,to.accommodate Penngrove. Upon conclusion of_the discussion and consideration of the matter, a motion was made by:Councilman baly•and seconded by Councilman Perry, Jr., denying Penngrove's request..to connect to the City sewer system because: of the Court's order on the growth control suit. Motion carried unanimously. Historic and Report dated:April 25, 1974, from Frank B.,_ Preservation Gray,Technical Advisor to the Mayor's Article_ -- Select Committee on Historic and Cultural Zoning Ordinance' Preservation, re modifications to the Ord #1138 NCS proposed Article 1.7 of Zoning Ordinance #1072..N.C.,S., submitted and filed. Councilman Matted reported that the Mayor's Select Committee, and members of the Chamber of Commerce and Downtown Improvement Committee met and resolved the questions that were presented at.the last Council meeting on the subject.ordnance; whereupon, Ordinance #1138 N...C.S. amending .Zoning Ordinance #1072'.N;::C.S:,. by adding Article 17 to provide .for designation, preservation, and control of the historic =and cultu=ral environment and significant landmarks and district's was introduced by Councilman Harberson, seconded by Councilman,Matte :, and ordered published by 7 affirmative .votes. Historic and Ordinance #1139 -N. C..,S. amending the Petaluma Cultural Municipal Code by adding Chapter 2.30 to Preservation Title 2 to establish a Historic and Cultural Committee Preservation Committee and delineating its Ord #1139 NCS duties and powers was introduced.by Councilman Harberson, seconded by Councilman Brunner; and ordered published by 7 affirmative votes. 1 �I 1 69 May 6, 1974 Regulate Indirect Ordinance #1134 N.C.S. amending Zoning Glare (Search Ordinance #1072 N.C.S., Article 22, Section Lights) 22- 304.2, to regulate indirect glare (search` Ord #1134 NCS lights) was introduced by Councilman Harberson, (Second Reading) seconded by Councilman Mattei, and adopted by 6 affirmative and 1 negative votes. Councilman Brunner voted "no." North Petaluma Councilman Daly reiterated his objection to Annexation #6 the annexation by stating that he continues'��/ Ord #2135 NCS to be of the opinion that the City should -- (Second Reading) not annex any more property until all infilling in the City is complete. Ordinance #1135 N.C.S. annexing territory described as North Petaluma Annexation #6 to the City of Petaluma was introduced by Councilman Brunner, seconded by Councilman Mattei, and adopted by the following vote: Ayes: Councilmen Brunner, Cavanagh, Jr., Mattei, and Perry, Jr. Noes: Councilmen Daly, Harberson, and Mayor Putnam. AB 2040 Because Assembly Bill 2040 has been revised a number of times and will be before the State Senate soon, Councilman Cavanagh, Jr., requested Council reaffirmation of its opposition to the Bill as expressed in Resolution #6309 - N.C.S., dated May 21, 1973. A motion was made by Councilman Cavanagh, Jr., and seconded by Councilman Daly, that a letter be written reaffirming the City's position. Motion carried unani- mously. The City Clerk was directed to send an immediate letter.to those listed on the resolution;* `plus a 'copy to Senator Behr. Mayor's Select Mr. Dennis Pooler, member of the subject Committee on -.. Committee, presented a copy of the statement Historic..- :. of Fred Schram on behalf of the Mayor's Preservation Select Committee on Historic Preservation made before the Petaluma City Council April 15, 1974. Mr. Pooler also presented a written statement to the Petaluma City Council for filing at the May 20th Council meeting when the. ordinance will be considered for adoption. He added that he will be unable to attend the meeting at that time. The two statements submitted and filed. Mt. View Estates Copy of letter dated-May 1, 1974, from ,569F Subdivision Chief Building Inspector Henry E. Anderson to Milt Hudis, engineer for the subdivision, of an inspection made by the Assistant City Engineer and the Building Inspectors of the retaining walls in the subject subdivision., submitted and filed. Memo dated May 6, 1974, from Chief Building Inspector Henry E. Anderson to Director of Public Works David Young of the corrections and inspections to be made at the subject subdivision, submitted and filed. ME May 6, 1974 Mt. View Estates Mr. Young reviewed the May 6th list for Subdivision Council information. (continued) Mr. Richard:Nucian, real estate agent,__ appeared before the Council on behalf of the buyers and asked whether the. homes are only released when the entire subdivision is completed. It was indicated to Mr,. Nucian that the Council's policy is not to grunt any occupancy permits until al -1, public improvements are completed by.the developer. Adjourned Meeting City Manager Robert Meyer announced that an adjourned meeting is necessary on May 13, 1974,.to act on the recommendation -of the Water Commis the water rationing plan for .the summer of 1974. Adjournment There being no further business to come before.the.Council, the meeting was adjourned at 11:35, o',clock p.m. to an executive session and to Monday, May 13,. 1974, at 7.:.30 o' clock .p:m. Mayor, Attest" • Cit Clerk