Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 11/18/1974MINUTES OF MEETING OF CITY COUNCIL PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA November 18; 1974' COUNCIL MEETING Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Petaluma was called to order by Mayor Putnam at the hour of :30 p.m. ATTENDANCE Present: Councilmen'Brunner, Cavanagh, Daly, Harberson, Mattei, Perry, J -r•., and Mayor Putnam. Absent: None. INVOCATION Due to the absence Reverend Ray Vinson, First Church -'of God, no invocation was given. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Minutes of October 29, 1974, were approved as recorded. CONSENT CALENDAR A motion was made by Councilman Perry, seconded by Councilman Mattei, adopting the Consent Calendar, Agenda Items #1 through #7. Motion carried unanimously. Agenda Item #1 Resolution 46737 N.C.S.-denying the claim of Lisa Ann Claim Denial-- Lewis. a minor, was-introduced Councilman Mattei, Lisa Ann Lewis seconded by Councilman Perry, and approved by 7 affirma- Res 446737 NCS tive votes. Agenda Item #2 Resolution 46738 N.C.S. denying the claim of Charles Claim Denial -- B. Gonzales, Sam W. Berry, and Henry L. Battle, Gonzales, Berry, individuals, behalf of themselves and all others and Battle similarly situated, was introduced by Councilman Res 46738 NCS Mattei, seconded by Councilman Perry, and approved by 7 affirmative votes: Agenda Item 443 Resolution 46739 N.C.S. authorizing the Mayor to Agreement - -John execute an-.agreement with John J: Clement and Joan M: J. Clement Clement•, his wife, re certain public improvements in Res 46739 NCS Sonoma County known as Sonoma County Parcel Map 444058, was introduced by Councilman Perry, seconded by Council- man Mattei, and approved by 7 affirmative votes. Agenda Item #4 Resolution 446740 N.C.S. accepting completion-of work Sunnyhills required in Sunnyhills Subdivision wa's introduced by Subdivision Re Councilman Mattei, seconded by Councilman Perry, and Public Improvements approved by 7 affirmative votes. Res 46740 NCS Agenda Item #5 Resolution 46741 N.C.S. approving plans and specifica- Call for Bids -- tions and calling for bids for backstops and sideline Fencing Kenilworth fences for the Kenilworth Athletic Fields was intro - Athletic Fields duced by Councilman Cavanagh, seconded by Councilman Res 46741 NCS Perry, and approved by 7 affirmative votes. Agenda Item #6 Resolution 46742 N.C.S. setting a public hearing date EIR,Public Hearing for the purpose of considering the Environmental Re Kieckhefer Impact Report for-the Walter Kieckhefer condominium Project project located at 1051 Petaluma Boulevard South was Res 46742 NCS introduced by Councilman Mattei, seconded by Council - man Perry, and approved by 7 affirmative votes. Agenda Item #7 Resolution 46743 N.C.S. accepting completion of the 1974 Street 1974 Street Resurfacing Project #PW 1 -72 was introduced Project #PW 1 -72 by Councilman Mattei, seconded by Councilman Perry, Res #6743 NCS and approved by 7 affirmative votes. 1 L/ V November 18, 1974 / BICYCLE ROUTE.PLAN -- RICHARD COURIER Richard Courier, representing the Petaluma Bicycle Safety Committee, requested permission from the Council to show a twenty -two minute film, "Bikeways for Better Living." The request was granted. Mr. Courier explained the group had come up with some suggestions for the use of the $20,000 allotted for providing bicycle lanes in the first year which differ from the Lampman Report. Working within the framework of the $20.,000 the Committee felt they could cover the major east /west routes in Petaluma and north /south in connecting roadways. Councilman Harberson, the Council's representative on the Recreation, Music, and Parks Commission said this group had made the same presentation at the Recreation Commission meeting October 9th, and the Commission, as a whole, adopted the recommendations. He stated the group had been formed primarily because they were interested in bicycle safety in Petaluma. The film was then shown to the City Council. At the conclusion of the film, Mr. Courier said he felt the film illustrated that busy roadways similar to Washington Street could be incorporated into bicycle routes if some planning efforts were made. Washington Street is,.of course, one of the exceptions the,Committee has taken to the Lampman Report.. Mr. Courier felt that if the Committee's recommendation to use Washington Street as a bicycle route.were rejected, the street would be used regardless of whether or not it was striped for bicycle lanes. Alternative routes could be offered, but if they are not the shortest routes bicycle riders will avoid them and go by the shortest route Mr. Courier proceeded to review.some of. the bikeway recommendations made by the Petaluma Bicycle Safety Committee in September, 1974. A copy of their recommendations is on file with the City Clerk aswell.as a small handout which the Committee had prepared for this evening's meeting indicating .twenty -two areas which would be made.more acces- sible by their proposed bike paths. Mr. Courier further stated the Committee took.exception to the Lampman Report wherein they recommended that berms.be used for Class 2 bikeways.. The Committee felt the berms did create a hazard and were not the safest areas in which to place bike paths. Councilman Matted pointed out that until such time as Ordinance #1164 N.C.S. providing for bicycle lanes and ,paths becomes effective, the Council cannot act on striping streets for bicycle lanes; however, he felt there should be some melding of the Bicycle Safety Committee's report with those of the Lamp - man.Report and the staff should come up with an implementation of'as many routes-as are feasibly possible with the $20,000 provided in the'budget. Mayor Putnam stressed that regardless of the lanes were indicated throughout the City, she was hopeful bicyclists would abide by the.routes specified and not ignore said routes in favor- of shorter distances. When Mayor Putnam asked Police Chief Higgins if the City was experiencing difficulty with cyclists obeying .traffic signals and laws, he replied in the affirmative that both young and old cyclists were ignoring traffic devices and stop signs. In response to Councilman Cavanagh's question of why Fifth Street was pre- ferred over Sixth Street in_the Safety Committee's report, Sue Parker, a member the Committee,_explained this street was closer to' areas where bicyclists would want to go - - for instance, the Post Office, the Library,, and the downtown shopping center. In response to Councilman Daly'.s question why the Bicycle Safety Committee had not considered Lakeville Highway as one of the major routes, Mr. Courier-said bicyclists - complained about using,Lakeville because of the traffic, the large - trucks_.and the speed which they travel.. Councilman Daly remarked he was impressed with the whole project as studied by the Bicycle Safety Committee and was wondering how much of it, dovetails with the Lampman Report; whereupon, Mayor Putnam indicated that the results of tonight's discussion could.lead.to the recommendations of the Bicycle Safety Committee as approved by the Recreation Commission being heard by the Planning Commission in their .annual review and updating of the General Plan. - 1 November 18, 1974 BICYCLE ROUTE PLAN -- Councilman Harberson the-Council's representative.on RICHARD COURIER the_Recrea.tion, Music, and Parks Commission urged the (continued) Council to approve those areas where the General Plan and the Bicycle Safety C'ommittee's recommendations are in concurrence; and as soon.as the ordinance becomes effective, permitting striping.or.providing for bicycle paths and lanes, that they should,be implemented- in-._the framework of the $20,000 available. The Mayor sought the .Council -'s, concurrence to which they. City Manager Robert Meyer suggested that those streets which are known not to be in opposition to the General Plan and to the Lampman Report should be submitted in the form of ,a resolution in order--for the. Council to go ahead to. establish routes when the ordinance becomes effective. _Mr. Meyer. further stated that those streets which were not being used for recreational purposes, but were being used for transportation purpose should be brought to the attention of the Planning Commission. If there are areas in question where parking would need to be removed from public streets, Mr. Meyer indicated these matters.should be brought to the attention of the Council in order that a public hearing could be held and all property owners who would be affected could be notified. BID OPENING-- Resolution 46744 N.C.S. awarding the contract for CHLORINE purchase of.liquid chlorine for the City of Petaluma RES 46.744 NCS was introduced by Councilman Cavanagh, seconded by Councilman.Daly, and approved by .6 affirmative votes and 1 absention. Councilman Harberson abstained because he calls on Continental Chemical Company who was the recipient of the award. Assistant Purchasing Office David Smith explained to the Council that..two bids had been received - -one from Georgia Pacific Corporation and the other from Continental Chemical Company. Since the City purchases chlorine in both 150 - pound cylinders and 2,000 - pound containers and the ratio on the smaller cylinders to the 2 -ton containers was greater in calculating the costs based on our annual anticipated needs, he found Continental Chemical to be the low bidder. Councilman Mattei questioned whether in future bidding, it would not be feasible for the City to call for.one bid on the 150 -pound cylinders for which Continental Chemical bid .2225_ per pound as opposed to Georgia Pacific's .95fi per Ipound; and another call for bid on the 2,000 -pound containers..for Georgia Pacific bid a lower figure, $209 each in 2 -ton deliveries, as opposed to Continental Chemical Company's $232.80 each. Mr. Smith indicated he would explore this avenue in the next.call for bids. /t BID OPENING-- Resolution #6745 N.C.S. awarding the contract for the FOUR -WHEEL DRIVE purchase of one four -wheel drive vehicle was introduced VEHICLE by Councilman Cavanagh, seconded by Councilman Harberson, RES 46745 NCS and approved by 6 affirmative and 1 negative votes. Assistant Purchasing Officer David Smith explained that seven dealers had been invited to bid on this vehicle and three bids have been received. The bid specified that either 1974 or 1975 vehicles would be acceptable. Sanderson Ford, Western Motors, and.Nave Dodge responded to the bid offering 1975 vehicles. Fire Chief Joseph Ellwood recommended the bid be awarded to Sanderson Ford for one 1975 Ford Bronco in the..amount,of.$.4,9.34. Chief Ellwood asked the Council's approval to take the additional $434 from Budget Section 101.415. Councilman Mattei remarked that he-was not in agreement that all..prices were going to escalate and felt that just because the bid had come in over the estimate indicated in the'budget, he did not feel we should keep on finding the extra money to make up the balance of the bid. He was in favor of going out to bid aga=in. Because of the need for a vehicle for weed abatement_.purpose in the forthcoming season, the Council approved the expenditure of the $434 from Budget Section 101.415 and the above resolution was passed. 01 November 18, 1974 CLAIMS AND BILLS Resolution #6746- N.C.S. approving claims and bills RES J6746 NCS #1980 to 1.2105, inclusive, and 42523 to 42544, in- clusive, approved for payment by the City Manager -was, introduced by Councilman Mattei, seconded by . Perry, and approved by 7 affirmative votes. �h 1973 -74 ANNUAL City Manager Robert Meyer presented..the 1973 -74 Annual REPORT Report to -the Council.commenting- ..that one additional . item incorporated in this year's report was the unen- cumbered balance report as of.June 30, 1974, for each budget section. Mr. Meyer:suggested• the Council may want -to review their . 1973 - Program of Service and compare it with the Annual Report -to determine which projects had been outlined - -the Program of- Service and how they were accomplished dur the year. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS City Manager: Robert. Meyer reported-he-had .received a total of -fifty - one -items suggested by various. depart -. ments for Council consideration in the next six months -. Councilman Daly - remarked he the Council should also be involved in the input into the items for Council's review. BUILDING - City Manager .Robert Meyer -- reviewed a report from the INSPECTION Building. Inspection -- Division on residential.and. RECAP commercial buildings.fo•r- the past 5 years, the months of July through October. He pointed out that although we are ahead of last -year on new single -- family dwellings, the number of dwelling units finaled is 38 for this year as opposed to 254 the - previous year. There have been no duplexes or multiple units this year, but there have been 14 new commercial buildings.. L� STOP NOTICE =- City Attorney Matt- Hudson informed the Council had GRANITE received a . "Stop Notice" from an equpment•rental... CONSTRUCTION company - claiming that a subcontractor- had.no.t paid for COMPANY their services. The City Attorney said typically we would withhold payment to Granite Construction,; however, there was and that was the filing of a bond at the rate'of 125% by the subcontrac -tor'. He further indicated the City would have -as much protection'by the filing-of the bond as -they would.by withholding the funds. The Council raised no objection to this alternate method.. VOTING DELEGATE-- City Manager Robert Meyer reported this'is the first 50th ANNUAL year the City of Petaluma has belonged to the National CONGRESS OF CITIES League of Cities and, therefore, this would be the first year. they would have voting privileges.' On a motion made by Mayor Putnam and seconded by Councilman Perry, Vice -Mayor Jack Cavanagh was named the voting delegate and Councilmen Brunner and Daly were named as the alternate voting delegates_. Motion carried unanimously. GROUND - BREAKING, Mayor Putnam - reported.she had attended the ground FhRST ASSEMBLY breaking ceremonies for the new First. Assembly of God OF 001) CHURCH Church to be located on Old Adobe Road outside of the City limits. - The church is presently located on the corner of-Bassett and Baker Streets.. The church owns approximately 10 acres in.the area; and in addition to building their church, they plan..to have a small .private park to the rear of the property. r CALL FOR- BIDS- - Resolution #6747 N.C.S. authorizing. -the City of Petaluma LEASE OF : to enter into a lease for ag ricultural J LAFFERTY RANCH g purposes of. RES #6747 NCS that certain real property known,as the Lafferty Ranch and calling_ for bids therefor was introduced by 'Council- man Perry, seconded by Councilman Daly, and approved --- - by 7 affirmative votes. Bids on said lease to be received by the City C1.'erk until the hour of 5:00 p.m., Tuesday, December 10, 1974. November 18, 1974 CALL FOR BIDS City Attorney Matt Hudson reviewed the draft lease LEASE OF , with the Council indicating he had incorporated into LAFFERTY RANCH the lease that no hunting would be permitted on the RES #6747 NCS property as directed-by the City Council. The lease (continued) has also been modified ,to,a one - .year period. He did not fill in the minimum acceptable bid and asked for Council direction on this matter. It was the decision of the Council that the minimum should be $1,900. -Councilman Brunner drew attention to paragraph #8 of the lease stating the insurance limits should be raised to $100;000/$300,.000 /$50,000. Councilman Mattei questioned City Attorney Hudson on some of the terms in the lease, specifically those which refer to the control of weeds on the property as well as the control of ground squirrels, rats, and mice. Mr. Hudson indicated the lease has been signed by the same family as f'ar back as his records go. Councilman Cavanagh felt the Council should not lose sight of the Recreation, Music, and Parks Commission's recommendation on the use of the land as a park site, and requested the matter be reviewed again next year. 3411 PETALUMA PUBLIC Before the.Council entered into a discussion on LIBRARY PROJECT approving the plans and specifications for the Library / Project, City Manager Robert Meyer stated a special delivery letter had been received as of this date directed to the City Council and to the members of the Library Board from'Mrs. Bertha D. Hellum, Prinicpal Associate of Robert S. Meyer and Associates. The letter was read by the City Clerk and ordered filed. Mayor Putnam called on Mrs. Dorothy Bertucci, member of the Library Board of Trustees, for her comments regarding the letter. Mrs. Bertucci indicated the Library Board, as a whole, -has not had an opportunity to review the letter -- Mr. Wightman, President of.the Board, was out of town. It was her personal feeling that the Board was working under the assumption that Mrs. Hellum had been kept advised by the architects; however, in view of the letter received today, this assumption is.probably not correct. Mrs.. Bertucci said it was her opinion that even -if it meant delaying the call for bids; she would like to have the opportunity to discuss, the matter with Mrs. Hellum. She felt that since Mrs. Hellum had been hired by the Board as a consultant, she should have an opportunity to review and approve the plans and specifications. Councilman Daly questioned whether.or not it was proper for the Council to even consider the plans and.specifications this evening as it was his under standing they had not.-been reviewed by the Planning Commission yet. Director of Community Development Frank reported they had been processed -at a site design review .special meeting and would appear.on the Planning Commission's next agenda. The Site Design.Review Board made two recommendations: (1) The City Council determine whether the .building should have a tile roof or a copper roof. (2) They wanted the City Council to look at the provisions for commuter parking off - site. The Library will take 90 spaces which are cur- rently being used by commuters. Planning Commission John Balshaw who had been a member of the Site - Design Review Board spoke to the Council on the design of the roof of the building. He felt the copper roof as depicted by the architect in the final plans was not the same type of.roof which was used on the sketch to show the voters before the Library Bond passed. He also felt that the parking was not a minor - issue that 110 ten spaces are needed for the.Library which will displace about .70 persons who presently.commute and park in the area. He felt to use Payran Street for parking would conflict with bike lanes as proposed by the City. City. Manager Robert Meyer pointed out that Fairgrounds Drive is a private street owned by•the City and the parking .in the area should be for the Little League, which had occupied the site, the Kenilworth Recreation Building, and the Fairgrounds:..tself. He also stressed that the first sketch used by the Library Bond Committee was merely an artist's sketch done in haste in order that something could.have been used prior to going.out on a bond issue. It was by no means a f inal.drawing, but was done for the convenience of the City in order to have a typical,looking building to show. - 3 12 November 18, 1974 PETALUMA PUBLIC Mr-s. Bertucci.indicated that at the Library Board LIBRARY PROJECT meeting of November 12th, action was .taken by the (continued) Board accepting the design of the copper ,roof. Mr. Robert J.. Gianelli of Beland, . Gianelli,. and Associates, Petaluma Project. Engineers, spoke to the Council stating their firm doesn.'t want the Council to think they'ar.e trying to .push them into a decision; however, if bids are to be received before the end of the year, it would be necessary to go .out. to bid tonight. If-it's the Council's intention not to go to bid tonight,.he would . suggest waiting until the end of January. -Mr. Gianelli, felt that the schematic drawing given to the City earlier and the final rendition were as close as most s.uch,drawings,stating that Napa.- Library,.for instance, bears little resemblance to the schematic design.: He further stated their.-firm felt they had given Mrs. Hellum ample drawings;. however,- there were some architectural drawings that were not.sent to her•when she attended the California Library Association meeting and met with Miss Hanna. Councilman Brunner, the Council's.representative on the Library Board of Trustees, said he had attended most of the meetings and was not aware there was a major difference on the roof. He further stated he agreed with the City Manager that .the commuter parking,was not the Council's responsibility. City Manager Robert Meyer said he that the plans should be reviewed by the City's Building Inspection Division-to-determine whether- or not the plans are in accordance with the Uniform Building Code. It was the consensus of the Council hold off calling for bids until the consultant, Mrs. Hellum, had an opportunity to review all the plans and specifications. Director of ,Community Development Frank Gray. reminded .the Council that the Site Design Review Committee's proposed conditions stipulated the Council should make the decision on the type: of roof for the structure. 'In the discussion which followed,, the merits of the copper, zinc alloy, and the roof were discussed between the Council and Mr. Gianelli. The question of the difference in cost was raised -by Councilman Mattei, and Mr. Gianelli indicated the zinc alloy roof would probably cost approximately- .$20,,000 less than the copper. This is one of the alternatives in the plans and specifica- tions. In order to determine the -cost for the tile roof, Mr. Gianelli said some additional work would be needed on the plans and.specifications.. .Upon the motion of Councilman Brunner, seconded.by Councilman Perry, and approved by 7 affirmative votes, the Council made the decision that the building should have a metal roof. Mr. Gianelli suggested to the Council that even though.the bid opening would not be until the 15th or 18th of January,-the Council proceed with haste in getting the-bids out in order -for- them to get as much exposure as possible.- 'City .Manager Robert Meyer said he was hopeful,Mrs. Hellum have an opportunity -to review the plans and specifications and an approval would.be received from the structural engineers and he suggested to the Council if they. are ready, the call for bids could be December 9, 1974. PROJECTS' -- COMMUNITY Director of Community , Developm'ent•Frank reviewed DEVELOPMENT a memorandum to the City Council dated November 15, 1974, which set forth alternate projects.for Title I Community: Development Funds, including a tentative schedule for preparing Title I application. The report is on file with the City Clerk. After reviewing the 16 contained in the memor=andum, Mr. Gray-said the- Council would have ao.adhere to a very strict schedule order to meet all the criteria- -the first of which would be the appointment of a Citizens' Committee December 2nd to act in an advisory capacity to.the City Council in formulating Title I application and the establishment.of a 3 -year. program. The.City -''s application for funds would consist primarily.of..the Housing Assistance Plan and 'the•3 -year summary -plan. Mr... Gray explained to the,Counc-il that the City of Petaluma would be eligible for discretionary fun a & well as the 7 other cities in the county and Sonoma County itself. He ant- icipates the first year's funding would.be about $500,000; the second 1 1 November 18, 1974 PROJECTS -- COMMUNITY year would.be about $1,,500,000; and, the third year DEVELOPMENT FUNDS would .be approximately $800,000. Santa Rosa is not (continued) included-in .the competition for these funds as they would be funded under another method. Mr. Gray advised.the Council he was seeking direction from Council this evening whether or not to move ahead to the applications. If the time schedule is.to.be met, they would have to move ahead very rapidly. Councilman.Daly felt that we should at least be in a position to compete for the funds; and when polling the Council,.6 of the 7 members confirmed that the department of Community.Development should go ahead with the application. Councilman,Cavanagh cast a.dissenting vote.. The Citizens' Committee is to be appointed at the next regular meeting of the City Council, December 2, 1974. SECOND TAXI Resolution #6748 R.C.S. DENYING a second,parking place CAB STAND, 160 for a taxi cab stand at 160 Keller Street, Myrel A. KELLER STREET Moss, was introduced by Councilman Harberson, seconded RES #6748 NCS by Councilman Brunner, and.approved by 6 affirmative and 1 negative votes. Councilman Cavanagh voted "no." Frank Gray, Director of the Department of .Community Development, in his letter of November 7, 1974, to the City Council had stated the Planning Commission recommended approval of the application for 1 additional parking space for Mr. Moss's taxi cab operation; however., since the letter had been written he was advised by the City Engineer David Young that the area in question and the other space used by Mr.. Moss for a taxi cab stand were areas being considered for elimination to provide .turning movement because of a future signal system. The Planning Commission did feel, however, that wherever it would be located, whether it be in that precise location or another, Mr.. Moss should be provided with 2 parking spaces for his.cabs. Councilman Mattei expressed concern about the.elimination of any parking stalls in the downtown area because merchants are now hard- pressed for parking for their customers. He further stated he did not feel that Mr. Moss needed 2 cab stands because of the fact his cabs were now radio equipped and they could be called in whenever needed. Councilman Mattei questioned whether or not Mr. Moss did not, in fact, already have.2 taxicab stands, since there was 1 near the Petaluma Hotel. Mr. Moss, applicant,.said he did not utilize the hotel.space since he has.moved his.business to 160 Keller Street and, normally, passengers�desiring:.service will either walk to that corner or call for a cab. Chief Higgins in responding to Councilman Cavanagh's question on the taxi cab stand near the Petaluma Hotel said he had had many enquiries from citizens regarding this space and why it was not being utilized; and if it was not to be.used as a.taxi cab stand, why it.did not revert to a normal parking space. Mr. Brad Nail, speaking from.the audience, said that parking is critical downtown and even the loss of 1 parking space could be felt by the merchants. Mr. Moss advised the Council.he is negotiating with the owners to lease the building which formerly housed the Deluxe Cleaners and part of the property behind this location . where he hoped to put a private parking area for 20 to 30 units. He also indicated he would be .using -one of the buildings to do the maintenance on his taxi cabs. Mr. Gray suggested that if he is going to use part of the area as a parking lot, it might be advisable to park his cabs in this area. However, Mr. Moss indicated that he still needs 2 spaces in front of his office because he doesn't know when the plans will be finalized. At the conclusion of the discussion, the Council passed the.above resolution denying the additional parking space. STREET NAME CHANGE -- Resolution #6749 N.C.S. renamin_g,a certain portion of MCKENZIE AVENUE TO McKenzie Avenue to Maria Drive was introduced by MARIA DRIVE Councilman Perry, seconded by Councilman Mattei, and RES #6749 approved by 7 affirmative votes. 313 3��� 314 November 18, 1974 STREET NAME CHANGE-- Director of Community Development Frank Gray reported McKENZIE AVENUE TO to the Council that a public hearing had been held at MARIA DRIVE the Planning Commission level.and no opposition to the RES 46749 NCS changing of .the name of a certain portion of McKenzie (continued) Avenue was received. The area in question is from McDowell Boulevard to the bridge over Washington Creek where the street then becomes Maria.Drive. There are no homes along this portion of the-street and the Planning Commission felt it was easier to change_McKenzie Avenue to Maria Drive rather than the reverse where homes are located'on Maria Drive. The Greenbriar Subdivision located in the area has private streets and most of the residents are located on those private streets. r� BICYCLE LANES Ordinance #1164.N.C.S. providing for bicycle lanes and / AND PATHS bicycle paths. in the City of Petaluma and adding or ORD 41164 NCS modifying certain bicycle traffic rules for the use (SECOND READING) thereof by amending Title 11, Chapter 11.72, Sections 11.72.220, 11.72.230, and 11.72.320,. of. the Petaluma Municipal Code, and adding to, Title 11, Chapter 11.72, of said Petaluma Municipal Code Sections 11.72.440, 11.72.450, 11.72.470, 11.72.480, and adding to Title_ll,.Chapter 11.32 of said Petaluma Municipal Code Section 11.32.100, which had been introduced by Councilman Harberson, seconded by Councilman Daly, was adopted by 7 affirmative votes. APPLICATIONS RE The final date.for receipt of applications from RESIDENTIAL residents to•serve on the 1975 -76 Residential Develop- DEVELOPMENT BOARD ment Evaluation Board was set for December 6,, 1974. r ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 11:55 p- m. to.Monday, November.25, 1974, at 7 :30. -p.m. for 'the purpose of (1) canvass of election, and (2) to hear presentations from - candidates seeking appointments to the City_ Planning Commission and the City Recreation, Music, and Parks Commission. Mayor• \ REZONING - -CASA Ordinance J 1163 N.C.S...amending Zoning Ordinance 41072 DE ARROYO N.C.S. by reclassifying-A.P. 417- 030 -16 and a portion ' ORD 41163 NCS of. A.P. #5 - 040 -04 (44.95 acres) from R- 1- 10,000 (One - (SECOND READING) family Residential) District and "A" (Agricultural) District to a Planned Unit District located. between Casa Grande Road, Frates Road, and Lakeville Highway, which had been introduced by Councilman Brunner, seconded by-Councilman Perry, was adopted by 7 affirmative votes. Attest: -City Cl k