HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 07/10/1972iz
MINUTES OF MEETING
OF C ITY .. WUNCTL.
PETALUMA; CALIFORNIA
July, 10, 1972
Council•Meeting. Adjourned meeting of-the Council of -the City
of Petaluma was'called_to order by Mayor
Putnam•at the hour of 1:30. o p.m.
Attendance Present: Councilmen..:Brunner *, Cavanagh, Jr.,
Clecak,.'Mattei, Perry, Jr., and
Mayor`'Putnam.
Absent,; Councilman Daly.
*Councilman Brunner at 8:00'p.,m.
Approval of Minutes The-minutes of June 19. 1972, were approved
as recorded.
Sub- reg.ional Letter, dated May 30, 1972, and filed with
Sewer Study.. the City Council on June 19, 1972, from Larry
F. Walker,, Project - Manager for the North
Mdrin /.South Regional Water Quality
Management.,Program-, stated that the purpose of
producing the draft. summary report of the Pro -
gram was to get input from each of the partici-
pating agenc,ie.s prior to'finalizing the Report
and..tha.t the Technical'Coordinating Committee
agreed "that all,comment.s on the report should
be in writing and submitted to the engineers
on or before ' Jul,y 2A, 1-972," in order to meet .
the sdhedule of November 1972 ;of submitting
the;.final detailed report, to the sewerage
agencies for adoption -.
The f;o engineers were present: Carlton
Yoder, John,.Je`nks; J. Warren Nute.
Mr, John Jenks summarized the backg.round.of
the study.,.the purpose and scope of•the study,
and the fundame of the proposed
three -phase program. A.recommended plan of
Phase .I was .displayed...for- Council information.
Discussion then ensued and the following ques-
tions'were presented by the Council, and the
City_ Manager
Lf..the.City proceeds - with Phase I the
Program, what assurance does it have that
the dischar.ge,requirements will not be
changed by 1980= 19.85?
How..would.the more stringent discharge re-
.quirements.affect- ...the reclamation phase of
..the program after 1980?
Would completion - of - Phase I in - ' 1 -9'78 be so
close to the 1980 - tertiary tr eatment.phas.e'
that -there would not. be full bene:f "t from
Phase I ?. (It was pointed out that both the
pipeline-and the tertiary ,.treatment phases
are needed,.)
If•the City proceeds with,Phase I, will
dumping into the Bay be prohibited and - an
ocean discharge be requested to be installed?
Is•.it_more economical to construct a tertiary
treatment facility for reclamation first,
rather . than construct the pipeline first as
_ I ,2j O
July 10, 1972
Sub - regional proposed in the report? We.would like an
Sewer Study economic .justification -
Will ..the - .pipel,ine be designed to withstand
earthquake. movements; la,nd, i;f breakag.e• occurs,
what' i's the effect?
S`ebas °topol, Santa Rosa, Rohner,t Park., and
the County a -re presently studying their
s °ewer:a�e - - sere ce basin.. I's there a puss
bility, that the .effluent ,could be . pumped into
an'.enlarged pipeline with disccharge into the
San Francisco Bay? If so,..could• the construc-
t ion 'cost be sha -red, with the'-area-to the
north? Will the San Franc1_sco water basin
accept sewage from the north coast?
.-Will the pipeline be sized .to h andle all
overflow even•if one.of "the treatment plants
breaks down?
Water pollution control is of widespread
concern. Has there - been any thought along
the line of a broader agency which would
'de- de-
si and : operate 'the system. and'- the City
being a partic'ipaht ?':
1
The above'quest were discussed.by Mr.
Jenks-and in some instances , . the consultants,
were- •requested..to further information:.
Mr. Jenks also reviewed the various.date.s
regarding the time - schedule for the various
aspects of the Program.:
Assistant C Hal Wood was directed
to' forward a .letter to the engineers as - re : -
quested -by_. Mr. Waller and incorporate the
.questions. presented and discussed.-
Mayors' and. Council-
City Manager-.Robert Meyer stated that Council
men's" Association
members;: will be contacted by : his. office re-
Meeting
gard'i.ng tra_nspor-tat on to. the subject . meeting
in-Sebastopol on. Thursday, July 13,. 1972.
Petaluma Day At -
City Manager ;Robert, Meyer requested - Council
The Sonoma. Co,unty
members to ' contact his • s.ecretary regarding
Fair
plans to, attend Petaluma Day "at the Sonoma
County - - Fair on July 19, 1972. Mayor °Putnam
stated that,Uice Mayo r:Cavanagh-, Jr., will,
.
officially represent the City of Petal,uma'.'
Meeting --
City Manager Robert, Meyer announced- that the
League of California
• .
next' quarterly meeting of, the'. Redwood• Empire
Cities, Redwbo.d
Division,. League•of California Cities, will
Empire Division'.
be held iri Healdsburg- on Saturday, July 22,
1972. Those,member.s planning to attend.were
requested" to contact his office
Study ..Ses -sion
It •.was, agreed to hold a • study .session on Mon
July 24, 1972
day; •July '24, 19,72 , from 3 : 0�0 o ' clock to 5:0.0
o'clock ° to discuss 'the• Me.thodo.logy and •review
the status the. S'treet•.Plan
Lines (,Lakeville Street. to Freeway.101).
1
July 10, 1972
Appropriation Ordinance #104'7 N.C. -S. -- Annual Appropriation
.Ordinance 1972 -73 Ordinance and. Capital Outlay Program to be
Ord #1047.NCS completed.during the fiscal year, . July 1, 1972,
_to.June 30, 1973;' to establish certain reserve
funds for future acquisitions; to provide for
capital acquisition of equipment; to provide
for certain improvement.proj'ects; and to pro-
vide for the items o`f•the capital outlay pro -
gram which exceed the value of $3,000 be ap-
proved.and be. ordered commenced by resolution
and to name the funds from which- a . particular
outlay program shall be paid, was introduced
by Councilman Clecak, seconded'by Councilman
Cavangh, Jr., and ordered =,posted by 6 affirma-
-tive votes, 1 absentee,..-
Subdivision Ordinance Discussion was held Subdivision Ordinance
Ord #1046 NCS #1046 N.C.-S. introduced at'the June 19, 1972,
Council meeting. Particularly reviewed and
clarified were:the provisions for the filing
of tentative and final'.maps,.dedication of land
for.park and recreational purposes,. and the
environmental impact on an area.
Mr'. Richard Brown, District Manager of the
Pacific .Te'lephone .Comp,any , . and Mr. Don Marquardt,
representative of the P.G. & E. Company, were
p•resentto- briefly discuss sections regarding
utilities: Planning: Director William McGivern
read changes recei.v.ed from P.G. & E:. Company
re Sections 22.7.801 "and 22.8.113. The.City
Manager requested. that the PUC Rules and Regu:-
lation's be reviewed regarding undergrounding
of _utilities .
Mr: Norman Rol- lins,�a local developer, appeared
before'the Council for clarification of a,num-
ber- of points -in the ordinance; and following
questions - raised thereon, Planning Director
McGivern was asked,to contact Mr. C. Mocine of
Williams and Mo_cine, consultants who, prepared
the subject ordinance, for a precise definition
of "Lot:" as described on Page 4 and fox clari-
fication regarding.Sections.22 7.401. and 22.7.403
as to contradiction -with the Zoning Ordinanc e
regarding• lot areas and dimensions and lot
widths The Councll to be advised there'on..
The;fo.11owing changes and .additions were auth-
orized':
Page 4 - Add.to definition of Parcel Map
Subdivision the following as -a.
subparagraph: "The Parcel Map Sub-
diV.ision does not include -cbriveyance
or • transfer ,of `lands or interest
therein to'any agency having the
power of eminent domain."
,Page 7. - • Section 22:4-.300 Last - :line.
Change the `word "of to "or."
Page 12 Fourth line from top the page.
' Change the,word "South" to "Sonoma."
Page - Add - Section 22.6.1200 "At the
time of filing a final subdivision
map, the subdivider shall pay such
fees as established by resolution
of the City Council."
I c2 2
July 10, 1972
Subdivision - Ordinance
Ord #1046',NCS
(Continued)
Page Section.22,'7.80L. to read as follows
All ,'utilities distribution facilities
shall- be - placed underground. "'
Page 29 - Section 22.7.13.01.1 For subdivi
si6hs- of one hundred- (100) lots-or
more, the subdivider shall dedicate
land or. pay a - fee,, or both, . in such
ratio as the Planning'Commission.
deems, :most. des _ De"dica,tion
of land shall at,the rate of,not
less than one and one =hal_f (1 1/2')
acres, of land per one hundred (100)
- lots in the subdivision or' five (5)
percent of the -. -total - area. in the
subdivi-si,ori, whichever is greater.
Page 33,- Section 22.8:.113 Change to- ,read
as "All utility distribu-
tion facilit'ies'(ncluding, but not
limited to ,electr:•c,., communication,
and'ca'bl& tele'visioh lines) installed
in and for the'purpose'of
service .to any subdivision be
t)r_ underground ,in -accordance with
the 'utility's rules, and regulations on
file with the California Public Utili-
ties Commission.
"Equipment appurtenant to undergr.ou,nd
facilities, such as`surf'ace - mounted
transformers; street poles,
pedestal= mounted. terminal- boxes .and
metertcabin and concealed.ducts,
may be'•installed above the surface
of the ground,.
"The.subdivid;er is responsible for
complying with the requirements of
thi's aect on; and shoal -1, '
ne.ces,sary ar,,rangements with the,
utility 'compan.ies involved for 'the.
installation of said =facilities.
Upon comp.letioh of the discussion,- a motion
was made by..,Co,unci.lman C.lecak and seconded
.by
Councilman Perry, Jr.., that the Subdivision*
Ordinance be modified and amended as outlined
above for reintroduction and re,posting soon
as possible. Motion carried unanimously.
Consent to Resolution #6082..N.C.S. consenting to assign-
Assignment -- ment of Towing Contract, was
Towing Contract Councilman NMattei; seconded by Councilman
Res #6082 NCS Cavanagh', J`r. , 'arid adopted' 6 affirmative
votes,'l absentee.
Contribution ,to . Resolution #60!83 , N , C-S. author the ex-
P.A.L. - penditure of $.1,,500 from 'the Tr.ari�sient Occupancy
Res #6083 .NCS Fund - .for - the purpose of; •sending the ;Police
Assistance League (P..A L.) Dr l -1 Team to Mil =.
waukee, Wisconsin, - wasintrod- ircedi by Councilman
Brunrier, seconded by Councilman Mattei, and
adopted by - 6 affirmative vote 1 absentee.
I�
July 10, 1972
Adjournment There being no further business.to- come before
-the-Council, the meeting was - adjourned at 10:55
..o..clock -p.m. - to an executive session.
Mayor"
Attest:
/_ �ej,
c
City Cle k