Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 10/24/19721o3 MINUTES OF MEETING OF CITY COUNCIL PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA October 1972- Council Meeting Adjourned meeting.of the Council of the City of Petaluma.was. called to order by Mayor Putnam -at- the hour of 7 :3.0 o'clock p.m. Attendance Present: Councilmen Brunner, Cavanagh, Jr., Clecak, Daly, Mattei, Perry, Jr., and Mayor Putnam. Absent: None. Approval of Minutes The mi ute.s of October 2, 1972, and October 16, 1972,, were- approved as recorded. The minutes of October 10, 1972, were approved with the following change on-line 1, page 6: 4 affirma- tive instead of 5 affirmative votes. CONSENT CALENDAR Upon a motion made by Daly, and seconded by Councilman Cavanagh, Jr., Agenda Items. #1 through. #8 on the Consent�Calendar were approved by.7 affirmative votes. Agenda,Item #1 -- Letter, dated October 5, 1972, from Mrs. Pearl 39z F Public.T ans- Perri; 130 Sunnyslope Road, discussing the need portation for public-transportation for senior citizens.. (Letter has been referred to the Committee on Jitneys for later consideration with other material received'on, the transportation problem.) Agenda Item #2 Copy of application filed with ABC Charlene 38F. ABC and Lawrence R. Bernauer for 'transfer to drop partner on off -sale Beer and Wine: 'License for 7-11-Store, 430 Washington Street, approved by the Chief'of Police, Building. Inspector, and Health Sanitarian; submitted and filed. Agenda Item #3 Copy o:f'application.f ^fled with ABC by James A. 36F ABC and Josephine Aquila and Graziano and Linda Perozzi'f:or transfer to drop partner on off sale Beer and Wine License for Graziano Gourmet, 117 North McDowell Boulevard, approved by Chief of.'Police, Building ;Inspector', and Health Sanitarian, submitted and filed. Agenda Item #.4 -- Copy 'off application filed with 'ABC Lido G. 36 r ABC Masini and Ne'llo,Miele for on - sale Beer and Wine License for Villa Lido.Very Fine Italian Restaurant, 5 08 , Petaluma South, approved by the. Chief of Police, Building Inspector, and Health Sanitarian, submitted•and, filed. Agenda Item #5 -- Letter, dated October.3, L972, from William. -LZ9 F Golden Gate Bus R:.. Lucius., Chairman Publ , -ic Information, Service Governmental Affair's Committee, responding to Mayor Putnam's letter of September 21, 1972, wherein a request was. to --meet with the Golden:Gate Bridge.District representatives. of - the- City, and appropriate groups; to meet and discuss a solution to provide a Golden Gaye , Transi.t Bu,s_,:xoute on McDowell Boulevard, submitted and filed. -Mr. Lucius indicated that a meeting.will, called as soon-as per - tinent information regarding the matter is available. Agenda Item #6 -.- Resolution #..6151 N.C.S-. approving claims and Claims and Bills brills Nos. 1070-to 1207 inclus Nos. 1388 Res #6151 NCS to 1414 inclusive, approved for payment by the City,Manager. 24 October 24,1972 Agenda Item .: #7 � Knicke•rbock'er• Hand; Pumper Res. • #'6152' NCS 1 5,2,2F Agenda -'Item #8 -- Request.For. Deviation . Plan Li."nes•- -20•- Magnolia Avenue Res #61.53 -NCS . Resolution, #;615=2. N . C..S . authorizing the Mayor to execute �a ',Lease- and restoration agre`embnt. with the. , Sierra. Conservation Center, <, relating to= the'Knickerbocker Hand Pumper'. Resolution , #6153 N.C.S. authorizing the Mayor 'to execute -an agr,eeme.nt with Paul Ciampi re-` lative :to property, located at 20 Magnolia . Avenue..' 4 � .. . � F Petaluma "I" Street C ty memo,. dated October 19, Annexation. 1.9 :7,2, stating, .that in a very re case "Weber Res 4615'4 NCS s the .C'ity of Thousand Oaks, -a decision was made ..by the bi.stri,ct Court* of Appeals that would.. indicate .the, C'ity.:of Petaluma. could not . legally .pr,oeeed with:,the subect :anne'xat'ion because th-isz case' ruled the Un °inh&bited Annexa- tion Act is .unconstitutional ' violative .of the " "orie' man- -one.• vo "te" rule that a 'petition for hearing, _in the Supreme - Court -. has been filed and the case is not ;final, but it 'is conceivable the Supreme: Court may hear the case, .,subm•itted ` and filed.. He', further, stated that the leg sla- ture will,Tas,s sa ;validating act - in January which would 'cute - present defects, providing that the :decision .has no.t•,,b.e.come final. Mr... Robert,., in ,hiz suggested that the heari'_n'_g be opened and closed' and, t °hat act - ion on the:.subject rdesolut on be' deferred•until the, first• ng ` November... However, in recent 'discussions with -other- City Attorneys and the l,e,gal staff of.. the :League of. California.' Cities . . h:e...recommend'ed, that, rather than wait . until the 'November,6th meet - °ng, the " Council consider and 'ae:t`,upon!the: matter tonight. Mr Robert', ; als,o indicated :tfiat the environmental imp actI will be .,required for the subj ;ect: Area at the point of time .when the project i s: •ready_ to proceed: He . noted that theNLo,.ca1 Agency Po.rmation. has indi ca.ted- requiring`th& environmental impact report a, It th °e,, time of iliri_g the petit i on: for annexation; however., Mr.: Robert: was of the opinion- such .filing Would b.e_,premature and, could impose a_,dual for..appl cants. With n_o , ob.- j;ecton 'from the Counc -1 the Mayor declared the. Public hearing open-'an to proceed with the subject - annexat °ion hearing. as - recom- mended by. the C,ty •Atto,rney. The City Clerk announced that no written. pro-, tests received..' D.i-recto'r o;f: Publ'ic ,Worka David ;Young presented a m'ap.,showing 'a ,3- phase pr.oposah, of. annexation f'or the so. -y area,: P;has•e 1 .- Subject area Phase 2' -. SUhty :,.Elope" Avenue - =Sunny Slope Road-- S: H'i'll Drive. -I'.. Street 'to D Street area. ' . Phase. .3 , Southeasterly of 'subject area.. F October 24.., 1972 2) 0 5 Peta•lumd "aT" .,Street In- _ response. ,to the .Mayor's call. for comments Annexation _ froni -the` floor Mr. Richard Lieb,. 1 Highland . Re "s #- 6154'.NCS Avenue; appeared . before the Council and claimed (continued) -- that--the tiao sub street's "j Street Sedan—Police Department Res 06155 NCS (Defeated) Res #6156 NCS and Sunny Slope Road'.) connecting the subject annexation area wi.th'the City and which will remain in the County after annexation, should be improved 'before annnexation -as required for Sunny: Slope Avenue in Phase :2-. annexation area. City Manager Robert Meyer alari:,fi point that the County of'Sonoma has agreed to* improve Sunny Slope Avenue if 510 of. the residents there - on agree- to form an assessment - district to con- struct curb,. gutter;- and sidewalk. He added that the City- will -riot improve the street- once t'he.are:a - annexed. He also recalled - that an election for, annex'ation...of: Sunny ,Slope Avenue.- Sunny Hi4l.l - area some .years ago was defeated.. Mr Lieb.empha 'iz.e'd no objection to the proposed annexation. Mr. "David- :.Lindberg:;.287 Sunnyslope - Road, repr.e senting.a number -'o'f rds.idents,•in: the proposed annexa.t'ion.,,,ar-ea - reiterated Mr.,'Lieb's comments regarding the - hazardous conditions of the ,sub - standard linking street's. He felt that circum - -stances have changed :since the last elect > ion . and =the people , in -the :S,unny Slope Avenue— Sunny Hill . F.oad cSunny ;Hi1lA)Dri:ve are:dzare &now ready to :annex 'to the City Mr Arthur Condio•t,ti , 112. Wikiup Drive, Santa Rosa, •annexation ap:pli -can't a developer of • the .property; addressed the `Council and stated he-• felt -`the ;street issue was not -, germane to the- annexation procedur.e that the matter of streets will ben: considered at the tentative. map stage. He. requested- the ..Cou•nci -1 to act on: the annexation as a step to, balance growth. in the western section of the :City. ` An •extensive' discussion followed on tYe street issue and' the G ty' "Attorney considered the. traffic c rculation..proba'em and impact on the environment as'-,. atters+ of the environmental, impact> report which:: report, is -required', to be filed 'a.t the time 'the, is ready to proceed with ti'e "deve:lopmen't,,, however, since . "I" Street `is r c,onsdered as the: main. ac.ce,ss. to the proposed ' development, he'City Manager was dire ted t6. das:cuss'with''the County of Sonoma the porssib lity of a , County; project to improve - that, pfortion F of ".I Street between. the proposed deyelo;pment and the City limits to ahleviate a. potential bt0bl'em. As no gther comments•were heard the Mayor de- clared the hearing.'clo:sed. Reso- lotion #615`4 -N C:S: approving the annexation of -cert_ain• uni'nhab t.ed territory designated "I". Street annexation to the City of Petaluma, was introduced. by Councilman Daly,- seconded by' .Co,unci-lman Brunner "and adopted ,by 7 affirmative - votes. Notice -to Bidders on the subject vehicle was g47r 'duly published: Report, dated October 24, 1972, from,- Police Chief Larry 'Higgins of the following 4 .bids , rece,ived. at • the bid opening .October 11, 1972, submitted and filed: 20 6 October 24., 1972 Sedan--Po Depaiftment' Res #61 5 5 NCS, (Def eated)- Re # 6*146 NC S. Demolition qof r Bu i ld i-ng - =3`30 English :Street V. kIV es. _ I k %.1 LA t- e z:> W J_ L. t J_ -- U ta 1- or Name ;Amount. - - M/air - cond'. air . Jim ..RoP& 0 We:,c�terte,rp Bros.. $ 3 ,; 54.1. 07 3. 2 1 '8 . 2 Wes term. Motors_ , 7r 28 .MotorS_, 3 38 Sanderson -Ford $3, 86,9.58 $3,- 52:8.33 A'lso from the State Dqpartment of General Services without air -conditloning- - $2 , 9 31,. 2.9, , - with'air conditioning= -$f3 0 5'4. 51.. (�hx�iaf's HIggins, stated that a comparable -vehicle with 2 :acceptable variations . in,the _sp6c:ifica .t ,c kons an -b , purchased in fr the State at a sla of, -$193". 41 without '-air conditioning, g. and $371-2 with.' air �condition r He! ecom-. mended that. 41l'b:ids be rejected, and , that the vehicle..be pu-r s cha'ed ro State. �fm the Stt Resolution # N.C.S. rejecting all bids, l. for the and d-ireqt-ing�_that the purchase be made through the 'St'ate-olf'.California,at St ate _'.iDrice­s was int I roi�uced I by- CpuhcIlman Br, u"nn ,''. - er - seconded by .- CbuncilmanCl -- ,ecak.,wand defeated b the-,follow- g_v AYES z, ACouncilmen - Brunner, Clec.ak-, and Daly. NOE S , :" Counc-i'lmen'CqVanagh.j Jr., Matte ,, ' Perry, Jr., and Mayor Putnam .The%basIc reasons expressed - for the nb 4-, 4 1. A, A 4_1, 11 :4 A • local. delivery adh6r,ing',to the specifications, - and'the good _16cal competitive bidding." Res - N,-.C.;,S. awardiAg contract to Zim Rose for, purchase of 1 passenger zedan, for the Police 'De,p.ax-tmdnt. - (with' air conditioning) , was intro d'' b y Councilman Mattei, secqpded' - q . by Cothcilma n Cavanagh•, Jr. - and a.dopted by, th& vote: Ayp' v t6n anaghi jr.,,Matte r , ii Pery ..." �:ounclilmei.-i .-Ca' it., and,. Vutnam. -N(DES:'. Counci -lmen B Clecak, and Daly.. Notice,-to Bidders of .the subject *-project 'was duly pqbjdshdd.. Summary of the - f dfl owing 5 bid rec'e'ived .:at the bid opening Oct6ber 19,, .1972; - submitted --and .-f iled; 'Name 'Amount -Ghilot-ti $1, r - .T., F •cLain $1,400.0 F. G. Mil'lerick $1' ,125.00 r nd6rhill .'Qqnst'uction. $' 97-0.00 :,Universal, Demolition $1-,750._00 Letter, dated,­0c'tob.ek. - 5, 197.2, from Jack and Lois �s Bea:sileyj, pwnehs of the, subj 60,E' property, .inf the Counci -thdt ^ the unsanitaxy:.qon_ di , of the.premises has been c1e & p lane u and it ' their. En'bant, to recon!str'dc t,the building to its ' natural- . beauty, 'submftted and filed. I I - I October 24:, 1972 1 2d 0 7 . Demolition.of� City Mapaqer'.7Robert.Meyer reported that the Building 3�a& owner has already started with repairs to the ,,�, Eng-1,i:r:,h.' building. -He suggested that the demolition bids w. ((- continued,)., beheld eld in abeyance for 30 dayspending�the ' owner's . progress)-on the project. Chief-Building 'Inspector.Henry Anderson added that the building is I to be up to,:a livable, safe and sani- tary cbhd . a the Council agreed to hold 8Y 1 :consensus % t he bids for Council consideration within 30 days. Garbagp-Se Lett date� d Septembe r 27., 1.9.72, from Mt! lfor� ' r . rvices­ Street Sweeping 'ing -Pau.1 Makrides complaining about the ho .cal Services garbage service, bytheCPetaluma Refuse Company and the disco,ntinuance'of the City's residential street read. and filed. Counc also reported that a number of - dom , P , Iaints,. , have- b.e,en received relative to fb anc& the Refuse Company.' The th p-p.r orm Gar ba mittee, consisting* of Council- Counc'i:l )T� ' *Co ge man.Cavdnagh,*,J_t., Chairman, and Councilmen - Brunner and Maffei, and appropriate staff members were directed to meet with the Refuse Company to discuss its.level of service. The matter of street-,sweeping. s was referred to Council,consideratio n of capital outlay projects. - The-City Manager. was:• --requested to appropriately "respond 'to Property 0 , wner- Lettef•;, ddted October -1, 1972, .from E. D. Chase 17f' Parking i ' 2'25 Street-,, ;suggesting the Council entertain thb 'ty of meter per- 1 -specific so -by the C the mits to be ld of �`o - a side r , t the s ide of affected residende - habitation for a fee, read and filed,. The was referred to the Traffitc Committee 'for its consideratio The 'City ;.Cle,rk wa - s directed to answpr• the letter indi:catinig t-he Cbancil"s referral. Two-Hospital City Mainageif.-Rob.ert. that a public Concept - . , pbe held -`at - 7:,30 p.m: on Thursday, hearing Will h "ctober* .1972, at'Kenilworth.•duni'or High. O '261i School by."the - So . noma Cbmpreh.ensiveiHealth .Planning "Council to,J ,cQ4si ­ er the proposal the Hillcr:est,Hospi . tal andv••the Petaluma General Hos Perty, J-r. , . was -delegated as••Cbuncil!represent.Ative to attend the hearing with the City - Mdnager:;' Other 'interested Council- ' men utged attend. A:, brief. discussio held on the 2-hospital concept and:a,mo.tion'- was made by Councilman Perry and - by Councilman. Brunner, goang-on.•re in suppoTt of the Petaluma General. locating on the easterly side of the,• Ci.ty..an.d..the Hill Hospital remaining in -i.�Ls, building and loca ' tion=-a'concept to•give aervices.. both sides of the community.' Motion adopted.-unanimously. City Spheres -of :.City-. Manager - Robert'Miayer reported on 2 letters 516 influence received from C. L awrence An drew, Chief'Executive Officer., Local Formation Commission of Sonoma County,:, regarding City'Spheres of Influence Letter, dated October"10, 1972, requesting a October 24, 1972 City ' - Spheres of I Ti fluence- (continued) Aaq V -SB .325 -- .Gasoline .,. Tax Monies,-- - I statement from each-city and sp -providing aewer, and/or - water services agree - "t -a ment may exist bet-we - en sudh city :or :distri .and" landowners outside its boundaries' and submit same by November 1, 1,972, submitted f iled.. - Letter 10, 1972' reque:stipg-that a -map.- be, and'questionria re; be. completed in connect ion* with the first phas& the,. Spheres of Influence Plahning"Program and.sub— mit..by'j�anua ' - 1, L973,' -submi't,.i---0 - and , filed'. y Ty A. map identifying lands for which agreements exist City and-land.owners outside of the City limits, was explained and discussed by the City 'Maha gpr• - he- 'poiiited : however that the -map will be modifiled'.to .include s services for 1 -lot -. on- the- s:outherly,.side. of Casa Grande,Rbad in'connection with the - sewer reimbursement agreement with" the ;Petaluma School District .for the ,.Grande .Junior-Senior Hi S choo 1 After- some discussion - -the;tmap . as presented ahall generally approved by -,for :submission, to the Local.Agency Forma ion, -Commi s'sion with the necessary state-- ments. City Ro reported that and -Dire , ct6r of Public Works David Young met with Sonoma. County-birectot of Public ,'Work-s Donald, Read last Friday concerning' SB 32 Tax Monies' to, hear. 'a status :•report . on the - meeting with Golden Gate Brid r. ge. Dist-ridt. - - Mr. Meyer stated, that i t a share f or the -ppear the, City's 1972 -73 fiscal - year will be_. $16 E) 00 of' the $if OoiO,. for the eligible agencies in Sono "!ColA . nty,.' Tfie.'elidib16 agencies are ted c kties:j the_ count an_ d the the 8 JL-ndor'pora Y. Go.1den .,Gate, Bridge District.. The Bridge District . plans '-file a claim '-for $427,016 Which then leaves a'ba­lance $573,060 for. Sonoma County and the §,.qities. In accordance with - SB - .325 rules,j - f unds . ,- received ar.e to be used -primarily'� for tr,4nsit purposes. 5O% matching of ,funds. i's - -a.l s " requirb-d. ' Appl-ications f or 'f un"ds are t 'be -f with o Iled. .'it. the 'Metropolitan Transporta- tion Commission by Nove mber.1j, 1972; , however, ,Mr . -Meyer pointed out.that individual cities are; vaiting fbt..the County to finalize An agree ment ! t'he idge 'authority before, pro,ce eding, with the applicatio-n as ' all eligible agencies with e -in the County are to coordinate their. claims prdor. to­submisoidft ' to the..Metrb.politan Trans- portation C6mmission. It was de,c.id&d, that :the City )Engine-er-' reQom- mend4, on of a commuter- parking lot at..,the'Fair- grounds be - ,exFilored, as a p.rQjedt . the use of the SB .3 f'un6 In r -to, Mt.. Mey6r' requ&st, either Counci1mi--n:Ma or Cav-anagh, Jr,. , or,both -were ­a-s4s accomp.an Mt. Meyer ,and app=7 pr , iate staf memberz, to the Board of Supervisor's meeting * whery the agreement with `regard',to the Brdqgb:' is :more fully discussed. -Counc-i,lman Cavan reminded Council 209, October. 24",.1972 1 I i . SBI -32:5. -- Gasoline members of, the - Board of Directors of. the Chamber tax-. of .Commence, /Golden Gate Bridge District .meeting (coht'inued)- to be held at noon -on. .Monday, November 6 1 - 1972 at the -Old Adobe =Room with regard to Golden Transit Bus .Service An,the City. • ..Sonoma - .County, Water° - City. Manager—Robert. Meyert re I ported that a copy F Bond. Electi: of a: .resolution was received'from Valley of the .'Mo6n•Co --Wat' bis t'rict unty e protesting the e 'd'e izion -of .th "Sonoma- . Count I s . y,Board of,Supervi ors c . I to :chargp:'the portion. of the election cost of e t 'h ­ recent Couhty bonds election tb the Sonoma County Water. -Agency.- ::Copy, submitted and filed. Grand - Openings, City Manager -Rob6rt..Meyerreminded Council Mervyns'. 'Department members of the .openin -*g I ceremonies for Mervyn's store, Pay-. n 'Store �at 10,::00.o'clock a-.m. on Sunday, , Department OctoOctober - 197,2-, and. for ,Pay 'n Save at 9.:00 .0�clock a.m...on,Monday,' October 1972. ABAG!­,General -It was reported by" t1ile City Manage -that JIF -Aszembly ' materdal has .been-received from ABAG .concerning . the General-Ass.embly on Friday, 'November 10, - 19 72,, , ;from '9::00, 'o',clock a.m to 5: o'clock P ...Copy o:f the. material is available for review in either the .City. or" City Manager's o,ffdce. - Di,scuss.-ion regarding subj was directed. included on the November &..Council meeting ,agenda... , of� California Brief, _;'reports,- -o f !,the.t*.subj.ect annual conference 2 V Cities'.... .;An.n -held An Anaheim, 1"5--18, 19.72, were given Conference.. - October y. ­ b ;t h e . -and -,memb r s of the Council who attended. - � Councilman:-Perry, - Jr. i commented on the" Ci -ty :of- VisaIi-a-'-s coordinated' and P ,., FireiProgram.: "He %.offered to make, a.study of a, :si- milar.- program­ 4Mayor.,Putnat directed that he .1m ee:t with ;the. -City -Manager, Police Chief an d Fire' Chief -concerning this matter. SB 1261—North Bay. Report,,• dated `Oct -2,0,. 1972., -from the �geativ Co'd i� P:e Library Board, of Trust regarding.. System ,t the implications,, of the subjecit Bill and re- Res questing: ,acti-on'.on,,proposed resolution urging. enactment; read-and'-, Mrs. Dorothy 5e-rtucci.,. member of the Library 'Board,; w ' as p re sent - .and stated that the Board re- commended the Councip the Bill; whereupon, , Reso 'Tution,'4'6153 N-.C"'S.'urging the enactment of SB 12 w as t .; innoduced- by Councilman Perry, S d by-; CoOncilman Cavanagh, Jr. and adopted by 7 a.f f,,i rmdt ive - vo te s Environmental Report, 'dated -Oc'tober,'.6, 1972, from City Attorney Impact. 'Report Robert. `,Envirohmental - Impact Reports and Implicatibn of-Mono.County Case.. submitted and— f:i I ed- Rep�ort,,, -'dated Octobet!--!ll,,.1972, from the League b•f Cali,f,O'rn:ia C! ties. 1-.Teqar,ding Friends of. Mammoth -vs. .:Boar f. d o Supervisors, of Mono County submitted "and' file Case, !su f le d, Letters, -datea and october 'f rom C. Lawrence Andrew, 'Executive Off icer, Sonoma:County -Local,Agehcy Formation - Commission. regarding environmental impact statements, sub- -- mItted 'and filed... - .11...' 1 October 24, 197'2 Environmental Impact Report (continued) j . City Attorney 'Robert discussed at considerable. length th:e `implicat-ons ;of "the •Friends .of . Mammoth• Dbcis o.n which .`'requi'res the. fi'l rig of envi-r "on- mental.impact. vate projects 'He urged 'the­ adopt' -ion . of- re.solutio- n' indicates those projec"ts that would not require' .a report 'and s;ugge.sted -the Planning Commi;s s'iori,'and- staff be r_ quiredt to ;� I nvestigate, an " recommend_ proce'dur for the iiripact. reports and, that the City "adopt ..an •,assessment report. along the l nes as "sugges by -"thdr •League •of Ca Cities: He further indicated that the, ;scope •and• length. of the report woua c vary according to the ' - project - proposal and that the °report; should;be required."at the earliest point=• .in time a 'pre' j ect can :; reasonab "ly be evaluated. He attended the 'Knox Committee - Bearing in Los- An es :.and'­it appears that legislation , .will b "e �•in ther,e early. ,in • the, :next s.essio'g n n' to ",clear up some existing;'.ambigu ties and' cancer- t mentioried by the witnesses appearing ,at. hearing Considerable discussion followed in which' Mr. No'rman- Roll - ins; "locA'l .developer, appeared before the Council- r.equesting effect o:f the eriviron- menta-1 impact report on' the 2 rezoning applica tons 'to be..consd`ere'd by the Council under Agenda 'Items 422 - -and 424 i The City Attorney recommend'ed­that :thes.e, rezonings -be referred bark, to. the Plann• rig' `Departme "nt and •Commission for a •"de :as'' to . t -he' need for ' an environ- mental impaet*statement..as recommended in his - -memo , ,,., dated b.ctob.er " -10 , 1972. Copy °of `.memo submi -tt,ed -and tf 1•ed: t Director "o.f R11-amAJ ng .William -.McG vein" informed -the. C "o,uncil•;tha,t a questionnaire form-on an. environmental ",negat :ve- report wihl available in' th'e Pl'-anning .De.partment .for developers, to complete.. Such._ form. will suf "fi as far as an immediate need' of :•a developer requir -ing -an. en- vironmen impact; . statement at. ;some future: date.. He. added- "t=hat the Council could act . on the 2 re2bming •_applications' -as longs as the developer - recognizea •the :;fact;,,ttha,t' -an environmental impact sta eme'nt is required to be` filed ­and the pos b;ility of additional information would be neces- sary" involving..a compl .envirbhmental impact repoort'. The proposed resolution. establishing guidelines for •those'.- proj;ects .wItlhin. the City not requiring environmental iMpact.'studies under the California .Environmental Qual "ity Act. of 1970 was .•reviewed , for acf;on.. Up •,conclusion of" the discussion the City Attorney'-suggested that ' . , the Council'' adopt. -Items #1'• through 4!1.3 -as -interim guidelines for projects for issuance of` permits that .do 'not have a . scign -ant impact on• the environment and do - not require environmental impact studies and that d "e�taihs with'. regard' to the proposed resolution presented at the next Council meeting 'in resoluti.on. form,. A motion ,was then. made by Councilman Daly , and seconded.' by Council- man Ma-trtei adopting; Ia 41 ,through. 41.3 as guidelines ;per, the City Attorney s recommendation. Motion carried unanimously. The.Ciay Attorney was, directed to ; ptepare the :nec'e'ss=ary resolution for the Novembe 6 Council meeting. October 24, 1972 Agenda ,; By- _donsensus,Agenda: #22..reg:arding, rezoning = cof_•property along Washington Creek was moved. _for, consideration -,at' this time. Rez,oni.ng _ 7Area Planning -.Commission Resolution #Z -16 -72 recorn- Al;ong, - Washington mending_ the ' adoption' of proposed - amendment to Creek Zo'ni -rig, Ordinance. #6,62 : .,N C.S. by reclassifying :Ord #110.68 .NCS :. _ A:P #7"'280-33,'1740j.4- # -43 from an R -1- 6; .,00:0;; (l.�Fam iy Residential) District to P.C.D.- ;(,Phanned - Community) District, submitted and fl led . , N Mr:.: Robert O' Neel .of ..Qantas Development Corpora- ton (;Young. Homes) addressed the Council and stated.tha 'the pr -open environmental impact reports, .and forms w1L be filed concerning their re.ioning.-- application.;_' The indicated that these reports will be submitted for Council consideration.:before adoption of the ordinance. Ordinance #.1068.bN::C..S.. amending Zoning Ordinance .. N:C:S. as recommended was introduced by Counci*Iman - Daly:; •Nse.conded by ,Councilman Brunner, and ordered _.published.-by 7 a'f'firmative .votes. Recess..: -A recess was .declared ,at 11:25 o'clock p.m. The - meeting aze.convened at 11: 30 o'clock p.m. Agenda'.. By_co'nsensus- • Ag;enda Item' #.23 regarding the use of ' the; former .;Chr,s;ti "an Church Building was moved for „.consideration at this time. Former- _ Christi'an, Recreation 'Director .,James Raymond. addressed Church Building the concerning the local interest in the preservation :.of;the former. Christian Church Bu ld'i -ng for.-community activities. He , stated that.the- Pet:aluma.Valley Homeowners Association - the H•istorical Society, and Heritage Homes have o:f,fered 'to assist in the restoration of the building ; -:., : Mr : .De,nnis Po:oler:• o;f_.:Heritage Homes , spoke to the . Coun:c.il,..about- --.preserving the building and .,stated .that- •Heritage .;Homes is prepared to under- write,t'heicostrof, reroofing the structure to _ meet City specificati "ons.and approval. ^ Mr-: Richard Courier .of,- the Petaluma Valley Homeowners' Assoc a -± n read a resolution ' op- posing.;the.destruc.tion.of the building and urged the Co.unc :l,.to. preserve the ' building :for perform_ing .arts >. and general public use. Others who .-spoke -in* f'a4mor of preserving the b:uilding� were ..- ... �Lo.,uis Ca,s!azz'a'•,• ; - Albert Way., .=+, .Carl. - •W. Peters,en .•81-5 East Washington Street:,' representing, the '.National Associa torn of. Federal Retired Employees, Tony _Caetano- ' •3119.. Howard Street. Chief± :Buildi;ngt °InGpector Henry Anderson reviewed estimate costs -'to bring, the building up .to a safe and useable condition and to m "inimum code requirements..- Qqunc .l'man ..Mat. tter .;indicated that he had not October 24, 1972 Former•Christ1an Church' 'Build -inq ( . llution -Water P0, Control Facil 19 7:2 F. Ou-tside -'.S'6wer ' Connection ­ 53 1 5 Sunny Slope Avenue Res #6158 NCS- outside Sewer Connection - .5 1,5 Sunny �S'lope Avenue Res4615'9 NCS Re 821, _825, and `829 East Washington Street Ord #1066,NCS (Second Reading) been in favor bf, the- build ingl but. in .view o , the ddmmui :he .sucr(iest'e'd for use of the b itl,d-krig 0 n . atrial basis for 6 months or. -1 year"." , After '..conslide rabl.6 di cussion a.motion` wa's mad4*by Btun-ner and seconded by .Councilman Cie'cdk accepting of Her the offe 1 tag Holies t&-*reroo.f, structure and that rleces,sa:ry funds 't, o V_ l I Wed. t6 bring the building up to code as the 9u c . y D6pa.�tmen t K(5. a f f i tma.t ive -. l.'-'ne­' negative g , votes C'uncilmah: ca Jr:­ votedt ! He de 'ire more 'detail-. on the - _ -, cost `fi The Mayqr`.th6n directed that the appointed i:n: May 'to assist,Mr. Raymond with programing - e, �. -use of building •'Schram g (.Fred ,Dennis P -- Mike: Bentley, Rober-ta-Stroebel, and TVt Confer) together with Councilman. . Clecak, Chief Building I , nspecto:r Anderson. Richard' .Courier ou-is,.Gasaz2'a,j. and -any other y riterested qitti,z on meet with' the City Manager to sch6du--16 _,rb,sto ratlion�o'f the st-t-ucture, evaluatb the, costs therel6r and. dh the. volunteer -setvi Letter; : L9 7 2, f rom Mr. - J6hn -. Olaf'-Ne Is on,, . As.s.1.sti&n: I t Division Chief, Manager, Grants, f or C. State Water-' Resburces Qpntrol'Bo�ard, q * .. , t transmitting � the, executed -Btate I . _ Grant Cbritract - tor' , th­& si ' Jbject­'project authorized by Water Bond" L aw - of, 11.9710, submitted A p qa .f iIed by Swa llow' p ,Any �on. behaiAT- of Collins fox 1 aingl&- family outside sewor connoCt on , a-t 535 Sun S.lopb Avenue, submitted _ and filed. Director of Public Works D'a Youn4- recommende"'d favorable action. 'Resolution #615 N.C..S.- granting the outside u sewer A,. L. -Collins was introduced by councilman Mattel, seconded by Councilman Daly!,'and adopted by 7 affirmative votes. Application. fi.led'by- 'Swallow Construction Com-, pany on behalf. o f ' . J r ;lames Albertoni fol single - family out8iide - sewer connection at 515 Sunny 511 Avenue, &ubm1 and. faled-.. Res(?Iut.- g,ranti-ng the outside sewer dbnhedti to James Albertoni was introduced, bk Councilman-Mat.te.i, seconded by Councilman Daly a-nd adopted, by 7 1 c I af f irmative, votes. The-?City 'At -recommended that the subject matter, be refer'r&d to the Planning Department and Cortimiss Mine If -an,-environmental impact' report iLS'.- needed .- however after some di:scu's.'slon. it 'wds_�general-ly agreed to follow the -13 items as approved, and. -the ( environmental. i mp act. - report be filed. at, the time a specific proposal is a 'nod. n Pl-'ahnin4 Director William McGi vein' 'pointed out that, two •zQpi_ng districts will be created on r one, lot if the rezQ4inq is, approved. This will then require a- Lot split and %a.' var- iande� .- !for lot depth..' e p th. , ' '✓' -. :r October 24, 1972 Rezoning - -817,, 821, 8'25, ' and. 829-East WashingtoiY Street Ord #10'66 NCS (Second Reading) (continued) . East •Washington Street Lines-- Lakeville. Street to ' U . S . ' 101, ;Freeway Ord # 1 6`7 NCS (Second ,Read- ng)- Agenda, Adjournment. 1 , ." I Ordinance: #1'066 amending Zoning Ordinance #66.2,N.C.S, by rezoning A.P. #7- 022 =29, # =33, #' -37., °arid the. southerly •1.30. feet of A.R. #7- 022 -.49 (,8;17,.:821, 825, : and 829 East `Washington Street) from R- M- 1500 (Multi- Family.Residential) Dis- trict' to a CN (Neighborhood" Commercial). District, was introduced.by Councilman Perry, Jr., seconded Councilman Daly, and adopted by 7 affirmative vote's. Councilman Matte's suggestion that a study be .conside-r-ed . t-o, -- .establish se.tbacks.on East Washington Street.in line with the Jonas Building, 620 East Wa'shington•Street, . that setbacks continue more or less as established on the .northerly side was taken.under-adv- sement. .Ordinance - #1067 N.0 S.:. establishing precise plan lines .over.certain property hereinafter described for the reservation of a future right - of -way for the, .pr-.o:posed. realignment of a portion of-East Washington Str.eet'from Lakeville Street to -U.S. 101 Freeway was introduced by Councilman Pe -rry, Jr.,. seconded by.Counc'ilman Daly, and adopted by 7 'affirmative - votes . No consderation.on Agenda Item, #26 - -State ballot propositions. There being -.no further business to come before the Councih, the meeting was- adjourned at 12:35 .o'clock a.m.., October 25,-1.972, (no executive session was held.) - in memory of Councilman Clecak's father =in -law, Mr.. Frank, Cimino, and in.memory'of.,Charles Traversi, one of the City' beloved -and prominent citizens who both recently passed away„ Mayor Attest:, r .