Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 07/03/19692 69 State Legislation Control of Fi lling the San Francisco Bay re Mayor - Putnam .reviewed 'the following communica- tions�regarding the question of extending authority of the land around the San Francisco Bay:. ay7 Letter dated` 27, 1969, ` from Melvin B. Lane Chairman, San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission, pointing out that the California Legislature is deciding the fu- ture of San Francisco Bay and debating the pro - posals made by BCDC with regard to the future development of the shoreline and salt ponds. The letter further stated that there is no.q,ues tion as to the'need to control future filling of of the Bay but.that the debate is whether BCDC needs, or should ;have, any control of the devel- opment of the salt ponds and the shoreline around the San Francisco Bay. Detai of the proposals were explained and.the letter concluded by stat- ing that proper development can be achieved with the very limited Bay -wide jurisdiction proposed by BCDC and by cooperation with local govern - ments. Said letter submitted and filed. Letter from the Office of the Mayor of Oakland a-nd signed- by Mayors of the following cities: San Leandro, Emeryville Albany, Oakland and Berkeley, stating that the Knox - Petris legis- lation would dramatically expand powers to allow BCDC to act in a regional.government capacity in those areas which are traditionally of home rule concern - zoning and,the issuance of building permits,,, and further stating that the cities in Alameda County are not against continuation of the present structure of the BCDC but are opposed to the mentioned bills which would expand the State Agency power . and all other Bills which would seriously jeopardize the principle of home rule. The letter contained a request for support by communicating with the State's Finance Com- mittee. MINUTES OF_MEETING OF CITY.COUNCIL PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA r July.3, 1969 Council Meeting Special Meeting of,the Council of the City of Petaluma called - to order by Mayor Putnam at the hour of 2:00 o'clock p.m. Attendance Present: Councilmen Battaglia, Brainerd, Brunner, Cavanagh, Jr., Joerger, Mattei and Mayor Putnam. Absent: None. Notice of the Call Notice of the Special Meeting called for July 3, 196`9; the of the City Clerk of the Delivery of said notice;'and, the consent of the members present of the Council of the' " holding of`said meeting, submitted and filed. Purpose of .the The' meeting was called for the purpose of con - Meeting sidering pending State Legislature regarding the control of filling the San Francisco Bay. State Legislation Control of Fi lling the San Francisco Bay re Mayor - Putnam .reviewed 'the following communica- tions�regarding the question of extending authority of the land around the San Francisco Bay:. ay7 Letter dated` 27, 1969, ` from Melvin B. Lane Chairman, San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission, pointing out that the California Legislature is deciding the fu- ture of San Francisco Bay and debating the pro - posals made by BCDC with regard to the future development of the shoreline and salt ponds. The letter further stated that there is no.q,ues tion as to the'need to control future filling of of the Bay but.that the debate is whether BCDC needs, or should ;have, any control of the devel- opment of the salt ponds and the shoreline around the San Francisco Bay. Detai of the proposals were explained and.the letter concluded by stat- ing that proper development can be achieved with the very limited Bay -wide jurisdiction proposed by BCDC and by cooperation with local govern - ments. Said letter submitted and filed. Letter from the Office of the Mayor of Oakland a-nd signed- by Mayors of the following cities: San Leandro, Emeryville Albany, Oakland and Berkeley, stating that the Knox - Petris legis- lation would dramatically expand powers to allow BCDC to act in a regional.government capacity in those areas which are traditionally of home rule concern - zoning and,the issuance of building permits,,, and further stating that the cities in Alameda County are not against continuation of the present structure of the BCDC but are opposed to the mentioned bills which would expand the State Agency power . and all other Bills which would seriously jeopardize the principle of home rule. The letter contained a request for support by communicating with the State's Finance Com- mittee. July 3, 1969 State Legislation re Control of F,i l the. San Francisco Bay (continued) Letter, dated Juner19, 1969, from William E. Siri, Chairman, Citizens' Alliance to Save San Francisco Bay, requesting that all City Councils fully investigate th.e various pro -' posals•to weaken controls on..filling-of.the San Francisco Bay,'concurring with BCDC's proposals and pointing out that BCDC and it =s control will expre.late this year unless action is taken by the Legislature at the cur- rent session. Attached to the letter was a list--of-City-Councils and Boards of Supervisors .who adopted formal resolutions supporting the work of'the.San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission. Said letter submitted :and filed. Following consideration by the Council of the various, positions presented in the communica- tions and request for City Councils to take action, -a mot , was made by Councilman Batta- glia and seconded by Councilman Brainerd, to.- support.the position as stated in the letter di- rected to,th City Councils received from the Citizens' Alliance to Save San Franci -sco Bay. Motion•carried unanimously. Adjournment There being no fLirther business to come before the Council, the meeting was adjourned, at.. 2,; 40 p.m. to an Executive. Session to consider ;per - 'sonnel matters and 'litigation.. Mayor Attest •City Cl rk *City Attorney Robert was asked to contact the League- 'of Ca,lifo;rni�a7 Cities regarding the latest - amendments: to the various Bills pending in the State Legi;sl_ature on the subject matters for a report thereon