HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 05/25/1959o
May.!25, 1959 - 7030 po mo
- City Hall - Petaluma, - Calif.
Adjourned meeting of the Council of the City of Petaluma called to order
bar Mayor Parent.
.{
ROLL CALL
Present: Councilmen Crinella, Ellis, Gustafson, Icing, - Matzen,
Van Bebber and Mayor Parent.
Absent- None.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Minutes from the meeting of May -1$, 1959, were -approved as recorded.
PETITIONS & COMMUNICATIONS
The following applications for transfer of alcoholic beverage licenses,
which were approved by the Chief of Police, were submitted and filed:
M. Co Hartwell & Ruby Go Hartwell
Alberta J a McCoy & R Mervin McCoy.
REPORTS OF CITY OFFICIALS
City Manager
Report re Subdivision Ordinance of Other Cities in .Bay Area
City Mana.ger's report dated May Z,' , '1959; xe subdi.vision ordinances -
developm:ent charges, submitted and filed°
City - Attorney Ed. Robert stated that as he recalled the Upland ease,
which was referred in the CityMana.ger' report, Petaluma's subdivision
ordinance did. not f�1.1 within the limitations of this case.
;U.ncilman Crinella believed this case vas involved with a City
cha rging; a subdivider for park improvements hen the park facilities were
z:
ava,,,�)1� to not only the subdivision, but everyone in the City..
Councilman King stated that he had never been in . favor of the
subdivision fee which the City of Petaluma now has.
Councilman.. Gustafson also felt that the City V 's present subdivision fee
was too high.
It was pointed out that, aside from the City of Corte Madera, Petaluma
is the only City in the Counties of Sonoma .and 'Marn which charges a subdivision
_fee ,, -
The City 'Manager pointed out that the City. Engineer and City Council
have to. approve of the drainage, etc, , in a subdivision before it is accepted,
After further discussion on the subject,, a poll was taken to decide
`whether or not the present - subdivision fee .of X600 00 per lot or $300a 00 per
acre should be eliminated. Results of the poll were a,8 follows
Ayes. Councilmen Crinel.la,. Ellis,_ ,Gustafson, King, Matzen,
Van Bebber and Mayor Parent.
'.Noes:° .None.
- (Councilman Crinell.a's refusal to vote on this matter was counted as
a "yes." vote in accordance with the provisions of the City Charter.)
The City Attorney was 'directed to prepare an amendment to the City
Code, eliminating the subdivision fees M o. Robert was also directed to
are information for. th - Council; indicating exactly what portions of the
Pre : p _
present legislation would be deleted,
Councilmen _Crinella and. King sted that they believed the City's
ta
present map filing fee of- $25, .00 to subdividers was fair enough°
(1) (cont'd)
May 2:5 '1959°
Subdivision Ord s contad
To a question : .by Councilman Matzen, Mr.. Merl Harper, Suit- Harper
Realty, stated. - that his firm will -be very willing to start annexation procedure
.for its proposed subdivision, since there will no longer be a subdivision fee
involved.
. City,Planning Com
Use Permit
Copy of resolution granting Use .Permi.t to United Church of Christ to
construct church, submitted and filed,
Director of Public Wo
Ken Park Recreation Bldg. - _Submissi Plans & Specifitation
Plans & specifications ,for the - rebrea.tion wilding in Kenilworth Park
were submitted and" filed.
City, Engineer Al Roberts went over the plans with the Council, answer-
irig various quesfiions relative to cost, siaee type of construction, etc
Couneilma:n Crinel.l.a .stated that the Library Board Was very happy
with the proposed—plans,
Councilman Gust f on congratulated the City Engineer on the fine job
he had done in. preparing the plans for the 'sub ject building,' . He also noted
that Councilman Ian Bebber had worked with the City Engineer on the heating
and plumbing plans for the building.,
The following resolution was then adopted°
Res.,- #2245 N,o Ga S .
introduced 'by Councilman. Gustafs seconded by Councilman Ellis,- entitled,
"RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR THE WORK ' OF CONSTRUCTING THE IKENIL.Vi!ORTH
RE'CREA-TI.ON : BUILDING AND AUTHORIZING THE CLERK TO
ADVERTISE FOR BIDS-'FOR SAND WORK,
read and adopted by 7 affirmative votes,
INTRODUCTION OF ; ORDINANCES' -�
- Sala Ord, - 1959` ° °60
To a - question bar Councilman _King, City Manager 'Ed Frank ansv -,ed
that the subject ordinance was lbased, on the cost of living index as set forth.
in a resolution adopte4by the Council last year=,, whereupon,,
Ord,* . #538 N Co S,
introduced by Councilman Cx°i;nella seconded -lay, Councilman Gustaf son, entitled,
"AN ORDINANCE TO AM END SECTION 10 OF THE. SALARY
ORDINANCE NO. 468 N'o Co S. FOR THE PURPOSE OF
INCREASING THE, SALARY OR WAGE RANGE OF THE
EMPLO 'EES.OF THE, CITY OF' "PEYALL41\44.
was ordered published by 7 affirmative votes.
Mayor Parent excused h-imself from the meeting at this time, Council
man King, Mice -President of the Council, presided°
(2)
May 25, 1959
ADOPTION OF ORDINANCES:
Ord - #537 NCS - -''Amend. Zoning Ord.. - Reclassifying Ppty. at
Ord, #537 N. C. S.
,introduced by Councilman seconded by. Councilman Crinella, entitled,
"AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE NO.
340 N. G� Sa BY RECLASSIFYING ASSESSOR'S PARC EL NO.
6-274r8, KNOWN AS AND LOCATED AT`210 LIBERTY
STREET,. FROM AN "R. T' ZONE, OR DISTRICT TO A "C-2"
ZONE OR DISTRICT.,
adopted by 6 affirmative votes, 1 absentee.
Mayor Parent returned to the meeting.
CONSIDERATION OF UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
TV Antenna - Melvin, S treet
Mt. Glen Clark, 416 Melvin.. Street, address,ed the Council regarding
the problem of moving TV antenna which serves 19 people - in his neighbor-
hood. Mr. - C lark explained that this problem had - arisen as - a result - of the
English Street Ext. job now being done by the City, and requested that this
group, the Melvih Street Cooperative Antenna. be to main,-
tarn the antenna without additional cost .. He stated that - grou p now has an
agreiem with Barbara . Pereira,. allowing them to have the antenna run
along her fence. Mr. Clark read this agreement to the Council.
The City*.A stated that,- according to law, he believed
responsibility of *moving "the antenna was that of the Melvin St.. Cooperative
Antenna Assoc. . 'A agreement s he understood the by Mr. Clark, - this -
w,--v3 ad"tually not an easement, but merely an agreement. -. Mt. Robert further
stated - diat Council might ' for - those - people, any right they
have to. cross over or under the street, Would - ha'veto be given under
nencToa'hme f%pe* i t "n order to Ii t
a ' c n rmi i e imina e the possibility of - their getting
a permanent righta the street, which, the City - could not approve, - and
I
it would: ave to be - a'license, - He - believed'these, , people would - have - to under.
stand that - in the future; a thing of - this sort - would be their responsibility,
shoul d the street have to be reconstructed, rerouted or. anthingdone. He did
not -believe the City could take that responsibility -for. them legally.
It was pointed out that the planned to start work.in this area
right away; the 'contractor 'could not very well begin his work until this matter
was set_ tled,
Con's ideiable discussion took place, during which the majority of the
CoLincil' expressed the minion that the relocation of - the antenna was the
responsibility of the City,, . - inasmuch as the moving of the antenna was being
necessitated by the City- Vs . work in the area
The City 'Engineer was directed - to determine how much cable would
h? Sze to e. moved aid how much 'it would
A Committee, consisting 'of Councilman Crinella, the City Engineer
stant City,.'Engineei, was 'app , "to U.nd. meet with Mr $ou.tz, who had
origin4lly instdlled the antenna, to determine the best of relocating
the cable The Committee was to report its findings `at an informal meeting
to be -held on Tuesday, May 26,
.9:05 p m A short intermission was declared,
9:15 P. m. ' The meeting was - called . bdck* to order
(3)
.
May 25', 1959
Water Company. Acqu.isition Decision re Organization
For the benefit of those Who had not' a.tt0h&ed the informal,meeting
last week with Mr. - Wells, representative of Stone .& Youngberg, Mayor
Parent related that members of the Council who had attended the meeting had
felt that the operating ordinance should provide for the present rate schedule
of the Calif. Water.'Service Co. . He pointed out that in order to maintain
the time schedule proposed by Stone & Youngberg, the Council should decide
upon the type of operation desired, etc. by June t
Mr. -Robert stated-thathe would like to have some indication of the
type of commission the Council desired, if they were .going to have a comp,
mission type operation`¢. the duties of the commission, etc,
Councilman King noted that the Council had already stated -that it
planned to operate the Water Co. under a commission. He therefore felt
that there should be a commission. type operation,
Councilman Van Bebber 'suggested that the CounciH*appoint a commis-
Sion for a trial period of one year to study the structure, 'make monthly
reports to the Council and at the end of the year, make ; its final recommend'-
tion to the Council,
Councilman Matzen felt that it would take considerable - time -for the
Council to decide upon the exact duties of a commission,- how the
would function, etc; He believed it might be a good to set up a com-
mission about a year after taking. over the Water Coo
Councilman - Grinella felt the -Water Co. should be operated virtually'
the same'as it is now operated-by Calif, Water' Coo ; - With the
rates and procedures for - one year. In the meantime, the water - commission
would have the opportunity to observe all these - rules and regulations and
become familiar. the - operation. . Councilm Crinella believed the
commission - shout -- be soon as
Mayor Parent took a - poll of Council - to determine ,if - the maJority
preferred to have commission type :operation of the Water Co. Thhere` were
7 affirmative votes cast..:
City,Attorney Robert stated that the. City of Hays and seems to
�wix1v rc� •�c:sentative °commission type operation, Its:Water Commis;,
Sion, basically, ;investigates the operational facilities relating `to changes;
niakcF recomm to Manager Council; recommends ways - of
financing changes twadd:it ons to - the plans & methods of operation; reeom=
mend's to the r c
CitY Managehanges of administrative policy:; and, submits
an annual 'financial statement with recommendations for - the budget and - -
capital improvements program: - The - City -of Santa Rosa's, Board of Utilities
has more author.ity the '=Wa;ter Commission in Hayward It sets the
policy to be put - into operation by th;e City Manager- and - "Water- Dept. Manager.
The ultimate control in both cities Ties with the City Council, .
After discussion on the subject, the C qty:: Attorney' was directed' .to
pr. epare an ordinance, similar to that of Haywa s, in _regard to the duties,
em., of the :Water Commission,
Mr.. Robert requested the Co.uncil's permission to 'contact both
Mr.. Wells and Mr.. Orrick in regard :to the policy of the City °as tooutside
connections, not - presently connected, and the policy of the City, : basically as
to subdivisions and deposits, etc.. As he understood, the City 'Wou' Id have to
change the present 'main extension policy He explained _that - the Calif o - Water
'Service .Co. does not charge. for 'connections o Mr R obert "noted that the
City mighty if there were. homes to be connected,' obligate itself to
spend :W 000. in install.ati.on a,nd meter costs.
It the general feel:i of the Council that the City - should recover
the cost of meter 'connections
(4)
121
May 25, 1959
Budget Study
$ud'et Sections 10, 11, 12, 14, 15 & 30 were tentatively approved as
recommended by the City Manager, with the exceptions: t= is.ted below:
Section 10. m $250 00 was del.ted from Section 10. 310, type-
writer repairs, $185. 00 was added to Section 10. 510, purchase of
new typewriter.
Sections 11. & 12,, -'Approved.
Section 1.40 -'Deleted :$25. 00 from Section 140 34 repairs
to 1 typewriter. Added. $5140 00 to Section 140 51.0, new typewriter
and Veri -File for bookkeeping records,
Section 15. - Approved.
S ection 300 - Added'.$500 00 to Section 30. 230, transportation.
Auded $3000 00 to Section 300 510, start of law library.
Councilman Van .Bebber suggested that the .$5000 00 in Section
X 470 be put into the reserve fund; however, Councilman -
..Gusta.fson disagreed on this change.. After some discussion on the
subject, a poll. was taken to determine if 'the majority of the
Council favored putting this $500. 00 item into the reserve fund.
The results of the poll were as _follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Crinella,.- Ellis - and. Van Bebber'
Noes: Councilmen .Gustafson King;.. Matzen & Mayor Parente
The- $5000 00 was to remain in Section 300 470
ADJOURNMENT:
There :being no further business to come before the Council, the
meeting -Alas adjourned.
Attest: `
V tl l a
City tlerk.
Mayor.
(5)