HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 03/19/1962F
nu f
2. recorded. 'h
Mi l id A Mki� -
5,"'196 we s om -,ting-,( roved a
u F
. - 1ONS '&-�C'OMMLJPqkG A�TTIQNS
E, eml--. 1`04 hlli6� St, datb d M4fd
• r M - Mr. Ang
Letter o
f i,6� 1962-,�,7
't'the draf r o ll
which exists
WRI r
- re uestin that the -Jhto� arid�dbk,
,,.,, , Aqge,prq m
:-
on Ellis' � rea a The : he for .8t'Uc v an re qrt the next Council
t t 1 d
Meet Was r
L etter.
r 'Ott, 651 Central AV&,-, dat6d:Maicb 10� 196.2
,- from. Mr`, J L- Sc
" W
g, - p.-pqrti6h df -
ie'Ueki� abandonment ,,py,diptting pro . ,.
,q -is perty on West Si and
ty
lej & hi h is a partly` on Ci propert
.nbvd1 o, tree: w c y qp,:pr,1yAt& pT�Op6rty nd
Y,
.Councilman 'King , called ::the -C6un&iil,"S-'att6ritI complainr-f received
from Mr„ t O ffi c e
,
j r egarding h
S t - - ' ;- " `.bf'fhe "IR , s -
q'8'tt -, e, r . ,,, i y�- ngine 6k
A 6" However, Assistant City
- ',e�"f one 10
of ' 7 'n his prq'p y
concerning development - ' l ' . - ,
J,6hfi Stra x a�
E, .1 er tford e
that'D-,-
propert) subdivided,
tha - t' it Wn a one , pa* Therefore subd ivisio n
q -qpqr y. to the eve Qp
Tnpnt'
Mr „Scott . , ha si gned . *an. agree]
rezoned "t&.gn Ziioq"E- to the
of the City when developin the
Af
staff Thq- C it y 1-hgj
V it cop of the abo ve
V
M Hue 15""BUr.]
drainage problem d b
n
questing th some "a d tion'e
-'b'
, M At
--it -'.En Dbn:.S6-bt
gineer
or thils
f h e w.
He fe lt thalf--l might' "IN"J”
t 6,4 viscib
- ;as sessment district in"order h
At the suggestion Of "Ma
-f6Yd,-W
t
iffbis land " M - rat
,p On to say that
e - Um
nent withl a e e his property was
- 0 M �th r equir e ments _* -
property, s effect that he' wo , comply "
: Y w ith 0
1 oh t h e - Ubjiact;�, , the matter was referred to the
,, �s
6 bi d provi C '
6 �wa�s it.,ected' to provi e King
ined'agreemen N
ftx on Dk- addressed the Council relative e
;V stdthig"t'ha't"if
hissituatidn' w
etl
as, terrible an
-.
tA �en theA- -C A pp"n"6 fl to solve the proble
that plann
s doubtful "at thig- wo uld sol ve _
iA
- 'rect the ez
C Engiiie6r� to
C it y -sh 6 uld contact the
arrange a:,di
A - :for ii,onA.fi6 • At torney Da rticu ar
U a that she
�etmg with
-Y "t . y.
d C
h n
" " ent
for mation of�ma
-1vehrck 19, Y9 .65. 7:3 WS.11`5
City Hal Retaluma Calif:
I" �e h f the City.
R bf - " cdlidd t
- o" order
a-r m eting o the b
5A,
?. Cd OR Crinel
Present �UhCjihfien--d
7' I ��
F
I I's -, U 4yor
.1.1
"MA n
r., ,, ��.
e an Vnebber
'Abs 4
=Absent. C
- X
�OQ A
I NV OC ATI ON:' Q 14 e
Invoi ,en; by
-ation was .&M,
Joh nson; ; Chr-'i§tidnChurbh,.
Ao
.s.
F
nu f
2. recorded. 'h
Mi l id A Mki� -
5,"'196 we s om -,ting-,( roved a
u F
. - 1ONS '&-�C'OMMLJPqkG A�TTIQNS
E, eml--. 1`04 hlli6� St, datb d M4fd
• r M - Mr. Ang
Letter o
f i,6� 1962-,�,7
't'the draf r o ll
which exists
WRI r
- re uestin that the -Jhto� arid�dbk,
,,.,, , Aqge,prq m
:-
on Ellis' � rea a The : he for .8t'Uc v an re qrt the next Council
t t 1 d
Meet Was r
L etter.
r 'Ott, 651 Central AV&,-, dat6d:Maicb 10� 196.2
,- from. Mr`, J L- Sc
" W
g, - p.-pqrti6h df -
ie'Ueki� abandonment ,,py,diptting pro . ,.
,q -is perty on West Si and
ty
lej & hi h is a partly` on Ci propert
.nbvd1 o, tree: w c y qp,:pr,1yAt& pT�Op6rty nd
Y,
.Councilman 'King , called ::the -C6un&iil,"S-'att6ritI complainr-f received
from Mr„ t O ffi c e
,
j r egarding h
S t - - ' ;- " `.bf'fhe "IR , s -
q'8'tt -, e, r . ,,, i y�- ngine 6k
A 6" However, Assistant City
- ',e�"f one 10
of ' 7 'n his prq'p y
concerning development - ' l ' . - ,
J,6hfi Stra x a�
E, .1 er tford e
that'D-,-
propert) subdivided,
tha - t' it Wn a one , pa* Therefore subd ivisio n
q -qpqr y. to the eve Qp
Tnpnt'
Mr „Scott . , ha si gned . *an. agree]
rezoned "t&.gn Ziioq"E- to the
of the City when developin the
Af
staff Thq- C it y 1-hgj
V it cop of the abo ve
V
M Hue 15""BUr.]
drainage problem d b
n
questing th some "a d tion'e
-'b'
, M At
--it -'.En Dbn:.S6-bt
gineer
or thils
f h e w.
He fe lt thalf--l might' "IN"J”
t 6,4 viscib
- ;as sessment district in"order h
At the suggestion Of "Ma
-f6Yd,-W
t
iffbis land " M - rat
,p On to say that
e - Um
nent withl a e e his property was
- 0 M �th r equir e ments _* -
property, s effect that he' wo , comply "
: Y w ith 0
1 oh t h e - Ubjiact;�, , the matter was referred to the
,, �s
6 bi d provi C '
6 �wa�s it.,ected' to provi e King
ined'agreemen N
ftx on Dk- addressed the Council relative e
;V stdthig"t'ha't"if
hissituatidn' w
etl
as, terrible an
-.
tA �en theA- -C A pp"n"6 fl to solve the proble
that plann
s doubtful "at thig- wo uld sol ve _
iA
- 'rect the ez
C Engiiie6r� to
C it y -sh 6 uld contact the
arrange a:,di
A - :for ii,onA.fi6 • At torney Da rticu ar
U a that she
�etmg with
-Y "t . y.
d C
h n
" " ent
for mation of�ma
31
s
Letter: from: State Treasurer Bert A, 1
attention to Senate ]iointResolution, #42 re; fed
derived from publid; bonds, submitted and-filE
proposed re`so'lution "would oppose the current
of federal income tax on interest income fron
Mr..Betts' 1`etter requested that the Cc
resolut; n t be f r" arded't the P e ;A
March 1:9 :1962
9fl�
s dated Feb. 26 19.62, ,_ calling
l' {
• income taxation of i nter est
it w.,as explained that the
>vement to perm the imposition p
iblic bonds. {
. it consider adoption of a sixri lar;
-�
w•
4 ' +fit
y,�
io si ent an ongress< g
unanimousl og ne Counc l -A ttorney- should be directed to y �
prepare such a resolution the e.etm` T r ,p
Letter from A & M S'tr.ping Co. dated March 1,,1962 submitting their
proposal; . including plans and cost, for the striping of City streets, etc.
submitted -and filed. zO
City Engineer Don Scott stated that. his departni'�t had bund that Z71t -
forces could-,perform this same. work at less cost thanset forth in. the A.: &. M
Striping: Companycs proposal
A't the request of Councilman. King,' the City 'Eng-ineer was then :directed
to, prepare, a report on the City's costs 'for striping ,under. the present; system
so .comparisons could be made.
Letter from.Miss ,Grace Studdert dated 10, 1962, ackn6wledging '
inf6rrhat on received -from City re sewer service charge, read'and filed.
y yoe ,o
Boat Harbor
Letter from State Div.: of" Small Craft Harbors dated March ,16, 1962, re �
Petaluma -Small Craft. Harbor loan read and filed, R,
Councilman King reported on a recent. meeting ;,with Mr. Richards, 'Div.`.
of Small -Craft Harbors, and members of his staff. He stated that. at the time
Ebasco services 'had submitted its 'plan for the Petaluma Harbor to th'e, State the
Small Craft Harbor Commission apparently felt that the harbor would , suppo` -t a
loan of $397, 000. and had agreed they 'would loan, the City this amount;, based' =
on the original, fea sib ility report submitted by.Ebasco, However; since that, time
certain changes had been made in the City's original plans by the Noble Harbor
Engineering firm and the .Harbor Commission "`staff had also changed;. The
y` °3sup'A
City °s present plans Were therefore re- evaluated and, the Harbor Commission
decided - that- these plans would only rapport a loan of $280; 000'. Councilman,
King, noted that neither Mr. Noble- nor the present Harbor' Commission felt
that 'the Ebasco: plan, could have supported a $397 000 loan. . King
went on to 'say that there Were several alternatives the City could take a nd`
that the Harbor Commission was anxious to assist in this matter. He explained. `
that the City could put up the additional, am'ount,.requir::ed by the State ,a -nd ,go
ahead, with the present plans, or make certain changes in the present plans so,
the- State approve - an adequate loan, etc.
Councilman King stated that he understood `the State was going make
a thorough. study of • the Petaluma Harbor situation and ihat - they ;planned to ,w.ork
with the City staff on this. It was suggested that Mr. Noble be asked.`to go
over this matter with the State also,
The City Attorne was directed :to determine how much more Work Mr.
Noble's contract would provide the City and 'report his findings to the Council.
REPORTS OF CITY..OF.FICIALSo
Water Commission
Committee Report re North Marin
Committee report dated March 16, 196 signed by City.Attorney Edouard.
E. Robert, "attaching exhibit of the effect of the, suggested agreement terms upon
the water service ar,ea.as established by the agreement with Sonoma County
Flood Control Dist, , read and filed.
(cont' d)
-2-
1
r t March 19 1962 �*° • ;;:.;:
P& ^P °o04oi aavv
North: Mar =m Agreement donC,d °``•oF
rr Gilbert North 1Vlarin Water Dist, lamed h ik `'P P
Mr a L exp ow the proposed
P ' , } • " '1 b 4 �. . ale j,,�.�t�
service area arrangement between" \North Marin and the. Cit
o f Petaluma would
h
r work. M' Gilbert stat
ed that whatever agreement was finally reached relative
to service Areas was of the opinion that the main ,consideration should alway "s
be that a property ownor''was -not - forced to pay an` unreasonable amount for water,''as�,�w.,:g�'-
' t
` merely to. make sure that he connected to" the. s stem designated to serve his area..d
City Attorney Ed;Robert stated that lie felt North Marin had reasonably
sound reasons for anting sh
Area "A ", as own on th
vcr e committee report,, in , their
distric`g
It :was-
pointed out that under the ag°eement North Marin would
merety
given first right to serve A'r`ea " A� ", and rf they sha uldtrefuse to serve '
a potential customer - Pdtaluind still would have the right to do $oa
s* •y--.
Mr. R E Layton, consultani engineer ai d Water Suptro l�ayid Young
r p .y ".'.
felt that the proposed agreement wo�#�d. °fie 'an .equ itable solution to the service. area ...
problem
1Vl'r Gilbert noted that the Board of Directors of the North Marin Water
Dist. had not approved the proposed agreement as`'vet However he belie fed , • r .
it would rheet their approval
O
r' The proposed agreement was referred to the Water Commission for. their
consderatiori, Mayor Matzen stated that th 0
ounci l would await a decis:Lcyn fram
North Mariri,•and the Water Commrssiori °s recommendation befiire acting.- on this ,
finally be reached the plan submitted toni lit was such that an °a reemerk could
g g...
ed relat>ve to the service area problem
North Bey, A•gueduct
Co;unci King. told the Council of a meeting to be held on April 6y in
connection with the North BayAqueduct project He' noted several different
methods by which the City of Petal um C could participate in this pro,ect if it
so desired' Councilirian King went on to ' say ' that he felt the Council should be
_ ,.
thinking this over and be ready to empress its opinion on the sub,ect by'the tune
of the meetingo : ;
Mayor` Matzen presumed that the Petaluma Water Dept would be Prepared
to make some sort of presentation at the meeting on April 6`0
;.
Aqueduct Connections; p
y y
Copy of "report of Water Supt David Youn dated March i3` i962 re
final payment on aqueduct: connections contract, submitted and fileda A portion
r
' 0 the rep'ort'r follows'°
.r
r .
"It is therefore my recommendaflion that the work be accepted sub f eet to
the ContractorRs correcting of the above noted deficiencies and 'that final '
s
payment be made sub to the: retention beyond the 35 day lien period of $300
until such lime. as the City accepts the Contractor s repair oi . the: above noteel
deficiencies
It is also recommended that the Contractor bear the costs incurred
as a result of the pressure surge de" scrilaed above and that these costs be
For the mon it s inform too'nracMtor. Yours e brieflp e rnent "
final a
su tracted fro Counc . , "
g y xpounded on some -.
of the information contained in his eport; whereu on
..}.. P
Res.. #2932 N C S
introduced by Councilman Colin seconded by' Couneflman Ellis entitled_
"R'ESOL ACCEPTING COMPLETION° OF CONTRACT
KNOWN AS e'AQUEDUC_6T COh1NECTIQI�IS
"s read and adopted by 6 aff rinat ve votes 1 . - -a P
r w
March 19.!14962
M P111%
water Main Ext ension ._4..,,P.e a or
Pe taluma North
_62" e PetalU
a 'S' " 'dated - - 6,"' t.9 r ma Blvd. 'North
of Wa -ter upt ate March 1
Re
t�. recom mending th
sion (Payid" that A 000 dead-,, end extension-*
12P Exti�,n,
s itt' ' g , n oted dl been
be con submitted. and fi 10d I Mrt...Y6un that this repbrt'ha'
Comm y a
by - W �`d uhin
the ke* ission and d4i they submithE4 and
M f year or construction I f ' o the
ou8ly voted budget $1
"t - '�dnnbxation: : toj e'Cityofp-ropett y on'both
h , ;side's. of the.:
facility pro dding that
Cit in amount
ma tching xfen.sIon and th'a't the ' A rii�
e _9
from general funds:
Z y at
Councilman.tCrinell.a w d6ted if the Water, Go' m1mission Would be Willing,
t
sha of cost 0 the main .lhnokt; ye , ar! u ' get;
ty � or its re
o reimburse the Ci f
be - expensObfthe , e
He fel't that, this actual done Dept
- rE!g aqeffilb�i of - the present.
I as their �m� I � y he' 'I
i nasmuch ma ste r I a
plan cal &d f6i� t e ve nt ual
main wi th -h a la�iger om
Mayor-- Matzen f'elt that the" property owners in the area shou'ld- be c ontacted
to dete m iine if they might consider sharing in the post of the main'
1h ofi'th6iihP C" �g6r i.i 'policy
Councilman. ing of "t e opini pr�
on main
extensions should, be'. changed -before the Council could commit 'Itself"to paying,
He. -,
-4pge
i.2 t, -
6. share of'the cost for the l H also,'believed it idir '6 ask ' -the ould be . 'a'
c ost Councilman King, ._g4re d the Council property owners to pay shai'O'of; the
would be setting 'a precedeni.f6k future anfiekafi6ns to the City by paift6ipatln'
g
in this prqjpct,�, He l as long als the , jje pf I had -a policy of
enlarging t itiaifis''Whidlier6 too s
- Wma 'the Council could d" where .,
4, pp_ po icy-
' 8st o b ip d through a connection ' c&fgev. =tie
property' amount of the c wou pai ' rep
i roUg
pr rs' share are " o If . the c I ost. would be - aid in this manner'
anner
qper ty
Water 'CbmmlssionO definite pbli&y should be . �
r' Stanley id6fl feiti ' definite
6 eliminate the necessit of Joint mueetin 9 h'
set on- pr
oj6cis t y g. P 1 c
individual, case.,
The matter was referred- back to the staff for further study Mayor'
0 u e. submit % t t - o the ," Council a
Matzen stated - that he !d V`enft
9 W 4tly
report in connection w6h.Coun policy on such -matters.,.
Webber entered _ounc man B h
(6 il V4n the ounoft C amber, The time Was
approximately 9 50 P mv),
9150, p m A recess was ,:declared ai this time,
1 0 M
The . 1e "&6 order'at 4 approximately - ,Q
_e was ta iled ba
Cit annpji
C ity anAger were s ubmitted
Adfin C M
Claims qpp.r.'oqOd.f6k pa:yment by the
- and file.4 _fioreupqn
Res.. ing 42933 N G
- kj 'i . . by 6_ ',Pib�r
intkodu60d. by C 6 _.ng an seconded' Councilman iq s
ds`�yo Nds, 721. to ,
'8 "iho 7 incl usive an
claims and bills
os. W60 6`41 8 6
Nos, 749W to 7 W siv
7" ffi
As. read and"46 't' d b'
., (4 y 7 iilwyp y
'a mqs,
..Council Comm-iftees
"�-
Sew er LinO,-,7,,Mi9sion.'& M ddbdield,. SSeS Dist 45)
Report of - Dir" - ' , ;' of Public W'o*r °&"C*t"'
_y E ngineer Donald
;.q Al
62: re sewer tine-; read, n filed hods of
Sol lng'pii§-piobbem ��6ke set forth in the r toit".
V
istfid
assessment t to 'inc lude.
gLing in"e,
ffi i, , d
P bounda-r-ies Of
',
,the properties of l r Ka n
-! arrisi-And.
(caht k
- 4
1
I.
" '1Vlareh 19 ' 1962 '
Sewer .Line Mission.:& Middlefield Dr :colt`'d
.Ado tin a master `s.ewer Ian for future
sewerage
in the
im, med ate "area and• conditioning future subdivisions of land in the area
upon the agreement by property owners to construdt these facilities°
(City' Attorney Ed Robert noted 'that d is would probably be a workable
:method io insure that the property owners in this area share equitably
.. . _ F
in the cost of sewer facilities to serve their properties
There was a "general discussion as to what course of action the Council
should take how many lots belonging to property o hers who were not in the
assessment d strict`+coul;dbe sewered into the existing main' etc.
Property owners _n the area, who addressed the Council on the subject
wer� Mro Stanley Anderson
er Mr Ken Van -Bebber
It Was the decision of "the Council to .r'efer the matt Wck to rho staff for
"further study and some sort of plan for future development of the area involved
in connect`lon with sewers, streets; e co
..
Mr Ken Van Rebber, asked to be` advised as to the Council's final decision:
in this matter, Mayor 1VI4zen assured him that this would he done.
Ihrector,of Public Works
L%nda Del M` Subd- #:1
Request`frorri Roths 1962, for extension
of tirne in which to complete i roven ents in subject subdivision, submitted
"and ':filed. whereupori9
<, , Res 429.84 N C,.S
introduced b Councllrrian Gustafson, seconded li Courieilinan Colin, entitled,
"RESOLUTION GRANTING TO ROTHSCHILD- & PHE LAN .7 AN
EXTENSIO OF TIME WITHIN, WHICH TO COMPLETE THE
t r
VII .R'K AND IMPROVEMENTS,REQUI�RED BY THE S VI-
S,ON`AGRFE . ENT -FOR LThIDA DEL 1VIAR SUBDIV
NO f 1. DATED MARCH ' 196.0
was .read iid_.adopted by 7 aff rmat ve. votes
faker Stre0i :Storan Dr`an. _
Request of Cement Gurr Construction Co dated March 16, 1962 for
extension of tirrie in which to. carriplete subject project, ; -s ubmitted= andedp
whereupon ..
Res #2935 N" Ck.S-a;
,introduced by' Councilman Ellis seconded by C6dridilman Gustafson➢• entitled.
- EXTENDING TIME OF COMPLETION OF THE
WORK OF BAKER STREET STORM DRAIN�IMPROVEMENTS-o"
was read '6iid adopted by 7 affirmative votes.
Petalumma R%�
Report` of D'r of Public Works dated -March 19 1962 calling attention
to the "Cease,"a -nd Desist" order of "the Shale Water Pollution Control M;
which_
pointed o:ut that untreated sewage is present ..n the Petaluma' River water
submitted and filed,
Mr Scott stated that the metal .sanitary line running along the. waterfront
frorri Western Ave, to the "�'; Street pumps was in' such poor' condition that
sewage was continually falling into ghe. River He believed this line was beyond
repa%ro Also- he pointed out that various old sanitary sewer lines were still
`yr
tied the storm in on "'' Street from Fourth Street on down to, the River:
cone " -d
5
a
M
March .19 .1.962
C
Petaluma River Pollution - cont'd
The "City Engineer Wa d to prepare plans ands eeifications for
P
- constructing a sewer on - "B" :Street from Fourth .St. to the "B" St, pump Mg
stat q and for the replacement of •the sewer line,'under the. dock.
No � Webster.;St �. W Petaluma jr High School Draa.xiage Problem
Report of Dir of Public Works dated l arch 1 .,9 19"�re N Webster Ste.
,.4'. s
' Wo .Petaluma Jr High School drainage problem sub fitted and filed
Tie report stated that 1VIr; Scott.had4. been :assured bar the high school
administrators that they, would be taking care of their shared of the dr`a^
in age'
�.., _
problem '
The City Engineer was directed, to keep watch on the;progxess being rna�de.:
on this project°
: S" "ewer .Line .- . Road
Reporro — f Dir of 'Publ d Maks dated. March M. 1962' , re- :Highland road
sewer line submitted and filed
The report expressed the opinion that owners of lots ,7 and 8 should ;not -be
required to share a` prorate cost of this sewer mazn since they would have :to
construct''their own extension of the ma n- and that the :owner of lot 4` ci d not:
' receive.drect be neht since he was served b a p reviously constr''ucted facl,ztye
Members of 'the Council being in agreeneiiX with Mr.. St ott °sopinion
the report wa s acCe pted'o -
City: Planning CoMmis sion
U e Permits .
Copies`of resolutions granting Use Permits to.the foll'oWng people were .
submitted and` filed: "
0 `:62 Pinky, s Pizza P rlor 321 .Petaluma Blvd. S t Sale
of Alcoholic Be. erage. --
U4 :62 1Vlanuel Arra ra1 4010 Petaluma Blvd° N Construct
operate mobile home park°'
U5 , 62 Mrs R Gubllett 346 Stuarts Dr t Conduct home"
for foster ch
Herbert Schultze 244 Petaluma Blvd.a No =. Operate
diesel & auto motive re pair 'shop, C , 2 :Zone°
Southeast AnneQti.on Noo .2 1962 Carl Bristl e)
Copy l of resolution 14 app ovirg ani'exation a'rici requesting Counci to::,
cornmenoe proceedings s ffif'' tied and`.filed,; whereupon,
-
Res • #2936 N C :a Se
introduced lay. Councilman Ellis and seconded b Counclmai'Crin entitled;,
" RESOLU tiON GI`TIN,C NOTICE OF PROPOSED ANNEXATION
TO CITY OF PETALUMA` OF UNINHABITED TERRITORY
DES RIBED HEREIN AND DESIG1�lATED ° SOUTHEAST' `
ANNEXA°�ION NO 2., 1962° AND CITING NOTICE OF TIME
r
,- Ah1D,'Fl AOE FOR HEARING OF' PROTESTS THIERETO.
was :adopted b 7 affirmative :votes:°
wbe ti'eLaL A nne r , onxNo
Copy of re 'olutiori 1 ;7 recomrnendin Council a��roval of subject'
r,
annexation and'. re uest�n Coxancil to commence roceedings
q g p sub�rnttted aril filed
,
• (cont�d) .
.
March 19, 1962
Wes-t -Petaluma'Annexation No. 2 - cont'd
Report of Fire Chief J. M., - E'aglin dated March 12; 1962 re fire protection
for , s ub'Jec-'t annexation, submitt6dand filed, It was recommended in the-report
tha,t 3,fire"hydrants be installed on Bodega Avei as soon as possible after
annexa,tio'n there was no fire protection in the area :at . this time,
Ma assured Chief Eaglin.that his recommendations concerning
�
.fire protection for the annexation would not be over:r
Res,. #2937 N. C. S,
introduced by Councilman Gustafson, seconded -, by;Councilman Crinella,- entitled,
A RESOLUTION 0F THE CITY COUNCIL OF: OF
PETALUMA CONSENTING TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF
PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN
INHABITED TERRITORY. DESIGNATED AS "WEST PETALUMA
ANNEXATION NO,.
d0*_ d b 7' ffitmati � e votes.
_y a v
Linda Del Mar- $( Uni ts 7 & 8"
_CQ01 of 'e
r solution 148' approving extension. of time within which- to file
fi nal ffi a
V submitted and filed.
Rezone -.- #6 and'#10 Fifth Street
Copy of resolution 422, recommending amendment to Zoning Ord, #34,0
NC S to reclassify property at 6:& 10 Fifth St. from R-3 to C-2 Zone, submitted
and filod;'where'upon,
Ord, #630 N. C. S.
introduced by Councilman Chnella, seconded by Councilman Ellis, entitled,
"'AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE NO.
340 C. S. BY REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCELS NOS. 8
:AND 87046-9 FROM AN 'R-T ZONE OR DISTRICT TO A 'C-2'
ZONE OR DISTRICT.
was ordered published by 7 aiffirmative votes.
a
Miscellaneous ;Repor
'.Sewer Service Charge _.. National Ice.& Cold Storage.-Co.
Report of Acc ountant John Scharer dat&d '12-, 1962,'re sewer
servic'e,cha - National Ice &_ Cold Storage Co., submitted and filed. A portion
of the report read as follows:
.... approximately 60% of the water purchased is 'waste Water! and
40%. goes :into the f inished product. If 'the . Council so desires to make relief in
this particular 'situat it would . be my recommendation that they be billed on
a basi8 of 60% of the water purchased .
Mr. 'Scha,re,r,stated that since preparing the foregoing report,. he had
received•a similar .request from the Lace House Laundry, based on the fact
tha�,,some of'the Water by
. th e , b the firm was converted into steam.
Councilman Crinelta believed this matter should'be given furtherboftsi&
era tion .before any action was taken. He felt that this might result in the Council's
receiving similar requests on various types of operations
g many s,imi here the total
w
wa did not go into wastes.
(cont' d)
7
March; 10y 1962
UILL 601 IN. %-
d'ucbd by Codhi lih on ed b" 6dnc Coli
9; intro 'an Gustafson seconded d y C ouncilman
. "AN ORDINANCE, APPROVING THE SPECIF ICA TIONS FOR AND
V� A HI 'd I H 'P R E t
AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE b : RE
OSTERFUMPI,. . t .. I
Sewer Ser vic e Vic Cha r ge Cold;Sto�xa
9P .'.,Ndtidnal Ice coni,'
C be 'i " 6 had be
A-'f ter a kingMr'�-' Sc f t he Store rer 1 0'
arrangq s uggested , estp his an
the 11% c'�Mn An
g '
satisfied,vith th bil , ,jp re
motion L t , report di
C e,ac accepted;
affirmative c6dn made a.-, m.' atth'e"'rep
ve answer 9 M
(It was noted t t,'1 - W& the r-equest -rom ,t e
that this
!, _'4; � . . , 1, - , . ". ;,., f, - �. i, �,
4ded' oUnci,man ' Ellis and
C
La ce House 'Lau'pdry-, -Th nwas,secp
carried by the foIIpW
Ayes Councilmen Ellis Gustafsjonj K ing Van 56'bbe' .a rid
-'.
Mayor Matzen
Noes. Cod nc`ilm'en Colin Crinel1q.'
e
ji W d repare ie
n
The City' Attor as then dike0te to giglgtio to'
p amend th
Jqs e hfs '
s�ent' sewer inande�.makingit.po` ss�j
d' 'ble fd "Airk
p re sent %an if ih` - prdDOt 9W i0s'
made under the proper circumstances after e
C iv il P rogres
't',df Asst Civil e ense ard
m , Alp E KdE�tka
R*' rt dated i96
,
".
C 'I De� R d d
R _2,
Report D submitted - and fil
Mr e..progress being, made relative to Civil D in Pkaluin
Ko ;areported that ffie C ity W.!?' Id b.
q - . e receiving rations
h fMI6ut fi�rs? under era -X s
future to be distribute to t e Jet th&- Fed
17,
6f Warehouse- or-ware ou in the, 'he
'this would necessitate e ses
h
NT G uar d
receive d . ...... Niffi�' A`
i s 6 the
had contacted the Stato ve permission o u '
or' "If this , iAot with`t�1&, oppr9y C'Mf' Kbgt.kd stated
A stora
the ofu of ,rmo kiieiits f *bu Idirig;,
There that he .go . .4h . eddwith ne sary. arrang,1 , . 1
., . 1. . - v I ., p a rt 4 , , ' the 3" " . I I
y�,er'6 no objections on the �art the Council
INTROD UCTION .-O ORDINANCES10_
Pu 11 Lrep_ D e' _t.
Boosfer. Pu F
'hase of a booste S pecificati ons e' p . - t, --,
r pump for ''the F-ire'Dep� Wot were or th
an'
submitteij d f i l ed , .'Whereu0oni-
was ordered posted by 7 affirmative votes.
Petty Cash Fund
h
jinoti ed that proposed on regarding the Pet The Mayor legislati P �q C's
nc
-4yor a
Fund would be'on the . next agenda for vieW
- A m Ondmofit.AQ, Sew.6t.;Sorvid& Or'd,, re Office -Build
A
Ord.. 632 N. Co S�
,
introduced s d
In, e
dgced by Councilman. Colin, seconded b' C6uncilmdn G
y,
"WORDINANC-8 AM-ENDING: CHAPTER 19, ARTICLE V
J!, 4
.SECTION 19!'28'OF THE PETALUMA 0,1, C Obt OF 158 ,.
TO ROVIDE ESTABL _TQR THE 1, jHING OF
_-HE FIX A ND. EST'
CHARGES . F OR I R SERVICES .A 1N)'F CILITIES.
RATES AND CHA-R-QQ_. A
FQRNISHED'WY . C ITY SEWAGE SYSTEM:6-
ordered posted by 7 .affirmative rotes
.
.8
' M - ch
ar 19- 1.962
CONSIDERATION ^O NEW �O.R: UNFINISHED. ,-BUSINESS
'-,
- to n
�A;0pj,:Jbr?ermit,. -Conduc,. ar' iva'l
Fbl`ey"�' -- d 1 __j_'. 'C M
Appl ication , ..to'con uct c in ity May 22 nd
'of d 'ie " d r"euppn .
y 2 7th Ch ief.
through D4 o ve , cl� b y 6iq. submitte and.f i Whp
R.e&. 42 N��, P introduced 10,
ioAuced Gustafson.' s C'0u*nc`ilmanCiinella , entitled,
imRESOLUTION GRANTING FOLEY AND AUTHORITY
TO CONDUCT A CARNIVAL IN THE CITY OP'PET-ALUMA
R 0 M THROUG -
MAY 'MAY27TH'
was :adopted by 7 affirmative votes"
Res #2939. M C S
cpd,by Counc.
irkrodq firridn Cr*n 6 lla�i seconded b.y b�' un C"'il ma h Ellis
1
jll entitled.,
- .!! , RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING .THE EXECUTI I-dF AN AGREE -
HE i'
7WEEN'T UM A
MENYBET bity dj? PETAL
"Ok"TH E t E �'A§ SESSMENT �`
`,kb§T�E'� 'Okbi; PROP RS IN
I T.
b"! -� I ST - RICT.NO- _5�XND Q H'CONT RACTO RS
adopted by I affirmative votes.,
Before roll ft on the foregoing. resolution; the contents of same were
explaine b y - n.6
-by the or Y�
st of. -�O Pffinnin Represe nt a tive ,
.,�Regqe4 ate ih�ie-�o w 4h,--K
. 1.
was - d6lbted'frbin fh q agenda
pypr
°d that trig
even .0 the
the cannon to see ift]
was :done; the cannon
M a" Ma `i&,
Y9,r
been recei from a
intere in Dorrbwi
up
ppext aturd,
A, the :advice
loane " be - th City'-Idj
In asmuch a - - s" t
w as i s d i 8 t- u s s' io n " a s
if hdCit"y shou pay
Mtt,.y6r Matzdh
If thoy : v 6
felt y-
e-shpq b - e,pq
After further-
, Orivor�s� to- determine -, . `--
no , thpy"oe,
_
to W
l oa n ed the 6 Ch
hed that D kultuidl Fair9
Fouirth. D -, *
st'' 9-rIA.—Il-,
de - sen Freight
which 'is, on lh6 of
Fair ,
o 'b" E di �ed to che
. je-ptions, to ihis ffie. City -- giii66i �yqp irepi., k c
want to keqpi;
C1 } might
t e ity,
16 e w&re any ' y parts h After this
was to be':given to: the Fdi1r as requested '
at t .
hi ' t une t Countil-bf anot"her''request which, had
!Q C pi Commerce 't
qaA ,up ommittee. They were
t dr iv e rs , "
C jr 1� o :. r -c, witio the t c lean=
'1g
t it WA s ec th f 'uibk
)f th e City A:ftbr d'''id6d ffidt e t rucks wou
_d
avers
ie City employees did not h6imal1 on Satur'ddy there
06ffid' these men might be willin to apgate their M.
ti or
did not feel that the 'Coun Sho , u 'id V61uffitee"'i for these Then.
donate their - 90rvicles' ,- , this w ould e fine; otherwise, ,he
fiSC.Q SS10n;t the City Engineer- was diied to check with the
F
&66 interested in onating .
ff d t heir i
.if §erv�es If
p
aid for the work, b'u' the trucks
amber of Commerce
jp Committee;