Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 11/04/1963November 4, 1963; - 7:30 p..in. City Hall - Petaluma, Calif. Regular meeting. -of the=,Council of the City.of Petaluma called: to order by Mayor Van Bebber. ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmen Battaglia, Brainerd, Ca_ ,, vanagh, Jr. ; Colin, is, Gans'; And Mayor Van Bebber. "'Abs'ent, None. INVOCATION: Invocation was given by Reverend Don .L. _Nickerson, United Church of Christ. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Minute's from the meetings of`'October 7 and October 28, 1963, were approved as recorded. CONSIDERATION OF BIDS: Service Center and Distribution. Secti011 Report of,Bd Opening on Oct. 18, 1963 Report on bid opening, on subject project dated November 1, 1963, signed by -the Director of Public Works and recommending tha .the contract be awarded to the low bidder,, . Frank B. Maus of Petaluma,, whereupon Res. No. , 3304 N.. C. S. introduced by :Battaglia, seconded by Councilman Gans,, entitled, "RESOLUTION AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF ONE (1) SERVICE CENTER AND DISTRIBUTION SECTION FOR THE DEPARTMENT''- OF PUBLIC WORKS. adopted by 7 affirmative votes. PETITIONS, AND COMMUNICATIONS: ,A udit. - Petaluma ' Sanitary Di°sp,esal Compa'izy Audit of the. Petaluma Sanitary Disposal Company for. the period of January 1, 19'62 to December 31, 1 bmitted .and filed.. e su` estio 6 of At th gg City Manager Robert Meyer, it was the decision of the Council'to have a study session, at which time Mr,' ;Kyle,, 'Public - Accountant;- and some one from the Company could, be present. to answer questions concerning the audit. REPORTS OF CITY 'OFFICIALS' City Manager Claims approved for paymnent•by -the City,-Manager were submitted. and filed. Councilman Colin,, questioned for clarification Check No. 3229 witness fee. The City Attorney stated if condeinnation is necessary, an expert witness is needed to' testify to his appraisal, The 'resolution approving claims was then adopted as follows: Res. No. 3305., ;N,. C S. introduced by. Brainerd, seconded by Councilman Ellis, approving claims and bills Nos, 3218' to 3267 inclusive and Nos. 2120 to 2133 inclusive, was. read-and adopted. by 7 affirmative votes. November 4, 1963 Item 5 of' Traffic Committee Report ,of September 19, 1963 After some discussion, 'it was the decision of ,the Council to take :a vote to determine whether or not to accept the recommendation of the Traffic Committee Report of September 19, 1963. Roll Call to accept Item No.. 5 of the Traffic Committee Report dated .September '19, 1963, , wasp defeated by the; following vote Ayes; Councilmen Cavanagh, _ Jr. , ,and Ellis: Noes: Councilmen :Battaglia, Brainerd, Colin, Gams, and z`tij.�, J Mayor Van Bebber, Traffic Committee Report Report of °Traffic: Committee dated November •4, .1963, . submitted and 'filed. - Co'uiicilman Colin was in favor of. eliminating, the 'left turns but was, reluctant to prohibit parking along Washington Street. Councilman Ellis. explained - nothing further w.11, be considered u ti -1 a- traffic count is -completed of the left turns at Petaluma Bo7levard and' Washington Street intersection. Approval of` the Traffic Committee Report, 1 - was passed by 7 dffirmative votes. For the benefit; of Councilmen new to the area, Councilman Colin- felt it would be nice to have -the locations of the proposed changes pointed out on. the, map. Director of Public Works Mountain Villa Subdivision No. I Report of Director of Public Works darted November 4 19,63, certifying, to the com letion of public improvements in: the Mountain Villa Ssubdivision -No, l in accor-d- p - azce with the subdivision agreement dated. June 4, 1963, submitted and filed; Whereupon Res, No. 3306 N'. C. S. introduced by Councilman Ellis, seconded :by Councilman Brainerd; entitled, "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING COMPLETION OF WORK REQUIRE:D IN MOUNTAIN VILLA SUBDIVISION 1. adopted by 7 affirmative votes. Lakeville - Annexation - - The Mayor said he had bee .info.rmed by the - County Counsel that since the . petition requesting annexation had been filed.pr.ior to S'eptember•.20,. it would not be necessary for this annexation`to go before , .the newly created Annexation Comm- assion. It was the decision of the Council to approve the boundaries of the annexation as outlined on the reap entitled, ''Lakeville Annexation 1963'" and to. forward the petition acid map to the Boundary Commission as soon.as possible. ADOPTION OF ORDINANCES: Amendment to water ordinance - re closing bills Ord. No. 702X C. S introduced by C'ouncilmah Colin, seconded by , Councilman Brainerd, entitled, November . 4, 1963 -Amendment to water, ordinance -re closing bills. (continued), "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 27 PETALUMA CITY CODE .SECTION '27.44, - BY ADDING THERETO' SECTION 27�.44,2 TO PROVIDE 'CLOSING. BILLS - IN AN AMOUNT OF. LESS THA $1.,00 MA BE - FOR GIVEN 'A I ND . BY ADDING T HERETO SECTION 2,7,44.3'TO PROVIDE CASH DEPOSIT BALANCES 'LESS THAN 1.1. 00 MAY BE 'R ETA INED. adopted,- by 7 aff irmative votes. Of& inappp to provide for sale of abandoned - bicycles at end. of three months 'Ord.. No. 703 N. C. S. introduced by Councilman Colin, seconded by Councilman Ellis,. entitled, ! ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 6 OF THE PETALUMA CITY CODE-, OF 195:8•BY -AMENDING A - SECTION, 6. 6 TH= EREOF' T0 PROVIDE FOR, SALE OF ABANDONED BICYCLES AT THE END OF THREEMONTHS. adopted by:7,affirmative votes. Qtoipan(e'to prohibit parking upon sidewalks, to provide for angle] to authorize im vehicles .parked on sidewalks or wa ays Ord.. No; 704 N. C. S. introduced by Councilman -Battaglia, seconded by Councilman'Braifierd,. entitled, "AN OR DINA NCE, A MENDING CHAPTER 15, OF THE PETALUMA CITY CODE'OF AMENDING ARTICLE IV, .'DIVISION 1, ;SECTION ''1 5.49 THEREOF . . TO .PROHIBIT PAR KING UPON SIDE- :WALK8 PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS; 'AMENDING SECTION 15.54 TO PROVIDE FOR, ANGLE PARKING AND AMENDING` -SECTION. 15 WTO IMPOUNDING. VEHICLES 'bk'k*DtSTR'IAN: W- L P-AR. DEWA - ._E adopted by if t" : .Votes - .,. ,, a i ma ive Civ D efense Ord' 'No. 705 introduced by .6ouncil n 'hif 'is' 'seconded by Councilman :Cavanagh, jr"., -entitled, "AN'ORDINAMEOF'THE CITY OF PETALUMA, PROVIDING FOR, .A CIVIL DEFENSE AND DISASTER ORGANIZATION, THE OFFICE 1OF DIRECTOR OF CIVIL DEFENSE AND DISASTER, DEFINING' HIS "POWERS. - AND, DUTIES, PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR THE VIOLATION OF"THE PROVISIONS OF 'THIS 1OR DINA NCE, AND R EPE]kLINO DINA NCES"IN CONFLICT THEREWITH-" . "'vo . 1 adopted, by 152. CONSIDERATION OF NEW OR UNFINISHED, BUSINESS: November 4, 063 Petaluma Gardens Subdiv Mr. john Miitchell',. representing the , Elton .Corporation, addressed the =Council: stating he .felt the most feasible method of financing and constructing 'the sewer Tine to thepropo'sed`Petalurna. Gardens Subdivision. would 'be.by'assessment di'str- ict would include the .proposed subdivision, , Gutermute - property, Converse :property, and Swanson and `Cutler property. He wanted the -.City to work with him in .promoting the assessment district. As an alternative route, Mr. mitchell'proposed - the , s fine. -go on the north of Ely Road and westerly to the - existing sewer line on East Madison Street. Mr. Mitchell also wondered if the City could : legally force _adjoining property - owners to tie into a sewer line constructed by him. Mr. Mitchell indicated, he may sit back and wait. until the. Gutermute and Converse proper .is developed.;before he proceeds with , hi's subdivision. In order to br. -ing the Council up, to date, the Mayor briefly discu'ssed,the; re'quire'- 'ments. of the City Engineer and the , advantages and disadvantages of.theproposed. sewer. line routes. Mr.. felt that by -the time Mr.. Mitchell is ready to file ;his final map, the City would' have established a sewer connection charge whereby he could.."reco.ver a .portion of his costs for extending the-sewer line., Planning Director Robert Byrd :commented that since .the City Engineer has laid out what he .thinks is the.,best route -and Mr.. Mitchell disagrees with the route, he should come in with an alternate .proposal. The Council could ,then make a decision to overrule -the City or to .concur with the Engineer. If the-Council con; curred with Mr.. Mitchell, the City Engineer could , be - directed to work. with Mr. .Mitchell in following through with an alternate proposal. Mr.. Mitchell could then decide if he wants to put =the dine through or to sit back and wait. Mr. Ben -Race,, 'Consulting Engineer of Santa Rosa, addressed the .Council stating basically there Was no disagreement with the City Engineer as to where the :various alternates should .go. The disagreement has been in trying. to find a solution whereby -it. would -be economically feasible for it client to. develop his property,. He felt the -City Engineer had very adequately determined where the .trunk sewer line should, go. At the suggestion iof Councilman Gans, the Mayor appointed Councilman. ,. Gans to meet with Mr. Mitchell and the -other property owners involved to try Ito =find a solution to the -problem. Contract with Cooperative. Personnel Serv-ices Res. No. 3307 N. C. S. introduced -by Councilman Gans, seconded by Councilman Brainerd, entitled',. "RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EMPLOYMENT OF CALIFORNIA -STATE PERSONNEL BOARD TO CONDUCT A SALARY SURVEY //3 COVERING THE MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES' OF THE CITY OF PETA LUMA . " - adopted by 7 .affirmative votes. Proposed North Bay Water 'District The :Mayor 'reminded the Council to ,be -sure to attend the -hearing -before the Board of Supervisors at 2:00 p. m. on November 5 'if at all possible. He also extended �3 ! the invitation to the -Water Commission. -4- 1!53. November 4, 1963 , Proposed North Bay Water 'District (continued) i Res. No. .3308 N. C. S. introduced by Councilman Gans; seconded by Councilman Battaglia, entitled, ''RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO APPEAR. BEFORE THE.SONOMA COUNTY BOARD OF S:UPER VISOR S,TO PROTEST THE FORMATION OF THE NORTH BAY WATER DISTRICT. " adopted by 7 affirmative votes. . .Apartment unit located at 323 'Petaluma. Boulevard North Report' of Building Inspector dated September 30, 1963, re a.p'artment is in violation of the State Housing Code, Uniform Building - and Plumbing Codes of the City of Petaluma submitted and filed. Planning Director Robert Byrd explained that the Lessee -has been notified to vacate. and :abandon the car storage operation and .that the tCity will take no further action, until the, car storage is reinstated. Si °dewalk Sales Councilman Brainerd wondered if the %City had an ordinance prohibiting the displaying of merchandise on sidewalks. .The. City Attorney explained an ordinance prohibits the placing of merchandise on the idewalks except in the City wide promotional sales by the Chamber of Come-_ coerce which have been approved by the Council•. The City Manager was directed to enforce the .ordinance regarding sidewalk displays. Holidays The Mayor noted that Monday, November 1.1, is a holiday and that-since .a large percentage of the community will.be working on that day, he thought it would be .better to divert this particular holiday to some other time when it would be more useful. The C.tyAttorney explained the present ordinance provides for the holidays to be the same as set forth in the ,Government Code. The Mayor felt the Council should consider the days available and set the holidays for the coming year. He , added that last year the employees were given the days preceding Christmas and New Years. Mr. Meyer suggested a list of the proposed holidays for the coming year be -presented. `to °the ,Council and if the Council is agreeable, an ordinance can be adopted to become effective .January 1, 1964. It was the -wish of the , Council to have the City Attorney prepare -a new ordinance establishing the holidays to be observed either for the coming. calendar or fiscal year. ADJOURNMENT: There:. being no further business to come before the , Council, the meeting was adjourned. Attest:.r X" City Clerk 5//0" 1 e 1 /L Mayor