HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 06/16/1952a
c a
Re ular meu ti n.,.; of the Caun.c the City of Petaluma- called
to order by Mayor 1
.. � rr e a Councilmen Adams Brown, Noy - wood, Schwobeda,, Shoemaker,
and mayor R.!4 ,ers a
Absent: . Councilman Schoenin ho
AP1'ROYAL OF' MINUTIKS :
�7 'He m r-T es or7he last meeting of June 9., 1952 were appr oved
as recorded.
CONZSIDT�RATIO OF BIDS:
tz. s be n the t me set for opening bids for Official Adverti.sinr;
for the year ending June 30, 1953, the Clerk opened and read one
bid from 'the Petalumaa Argus- Courier, whereupon
Res. 4967 N.C.S.
Introduced by Councilman Adams, seconded by Councilman Brown, ent :tied:
"Resolution awardincr contract for Official Advertisin;m"
adopted by E a ffirr - ma.tive votes, 1 absentee.
P - 'T7TT P. CO' "° VNIC'1Tl'O S :
Request for abandonment of alley
Requ , o ? orneys- ou s, Lounibos,, on behalf of clients
. !,!arJor ie Rudolph and Grace ntcers for the abandonment of an alley
ruhni.ng between lots 266 and 267, read and fl-led,_ whereupon
Res. -7968 N.C.S.
int.roduced by Councilman Shoemaker, seconded by Councilman Norwood,
..e, ent Ltl.
"FiZesoluti.on of Intention to vacate the Street or portion. of
Street consisting of an Alley 20 feet in width runninG between
Lots 266 and 267, q s s ha. , iri on Stratton's '4ap of the City of
Petaluma Call.fornia, comme ncing on the southerly side of
Bassett Street and runniri in a general southerly direction
to Douglass St., city of Petaluma,, CaliforriiaoP
adopted by 6 affirmative mative votes,, 1 absentee.
A4 l cations for annexation to Cites
Pet1ti c ated Xurict°'° l .h2e anc si mel by property ovmers
on 1 1to View Ave for annexation to the City of Petaluma, read and
fi.l.edo
Petition, dated �fur3e l6, 1952, and signed by property owners
in the neinhborhood of Glendon ".ay, for annexation to "he City of
Petaluma, read and filed.
.3oth petitions ,+cre brou7ht up under N ew Busin City , -'aria per
Rd Frank reportin-, that there are a number of other. interested T),arties
circulattn� annexation petitions in the same area., aY at _hIs su .,e..tion
the City - Morn-y ;ias reg,_iosted to prepare ' a written opinion or
report on the required proceedure in tmnexation mattersp, said report
to be publicized for tide benefit of those interested in initiating
arnexation proceedinzs
Re recrultin^ :cam ap i r,-.i - r'at 7 1 Guard Reserve Unit
e tex om Recru t. - vic toorla �. ,p ck one alf o.f 7- t"he recruit -
i-n cdmpaig of Company k of t;ne National xu ard R eserve Unit,
read; filed, and referred to - the City t:N,ana�er for reply.
~t :41 PORTS 01" CITY OFFICIALS
-.. City Itanag
Claims;: approved for payment by the City ±anager were submitted,
whereupon< .
Res. 4
L ,
�3
1J �d \: -i... :.. :.,.al.i - r, -Z IsF,, _•bai.. _1 i,ty �_ -. .t(.:.3:';t,•.
(7 -10s. r �
bps .��.rl ; � claims ' 41-0 42 inclusive.), ad.�..��1J'1r(.;ia. by 6
a ffi_rmaM';live vot es, 1 absentee.
P erSC) .rnel ;7l ment dated June 10, 1.952, sub~nittecf an filed.
E ; 'C�raieSL for �`4&i.000. , for City Projects In Sonoma County bud!7et.
F. Lyttle requesting ' inelpsion of cei Lain items, totalin '
In the 1952-53 Sonoma County Budget submitted and filed.
pie - renting or leasin- automobiles to City
R� br lff My fan ren or eosin automobiles
to the City of Petaluma, read and filed.
The City `Rana further reported that in response to his
Invitation to all car dealers to submit a bid for the r:entin. or
leasing of automobiles to the City, he had so far received only
one proposal, It was agreed that time for receiving proposals
be held open until next •Tonday, the City T'Cnnayer In the meantime
to so advise the car dealers.
Re - C rios., trial offer of T'ar'e -Om `eter Co.
e er from t ?e rl3rk -O-' ".ter Co. to the City 'ana�er re
e mos. trial offer on the installation of Park- O- 'teters for the
2nd and B St. narkin7 lot, read and filed. •
Councilman '!ch reported that one of the recommendations
of the Off- Street P.a.r'rinr Com!nittee is the purchase of the property
at 2nd and D St. but that this trial run ., prove :Mother or not
it is a good l
The City Attorney was asked to prepare an ordinance authorizing
the acceptance of said offer of the Park -O- Pieter Company.
Citv Plannin Corn.
Letter from the Pete.?
.favorable action on the P�ovak
together with a report, dated
City En7ineer; pointing out c
in the area to be annexed, as
mead and filed.
'" Commission recom-nendin!°
petition: for annexation .to the City,
June 5, 1952, si7ned by Donald -
artain defects in street construction
well as other end:- ineering problems,
Mnthly reports of the I.,ibrari and the 'Fay 1952 monthly
attendance report of the Director of Recreation, Parks, and Music,,
read and filed.
Rerort on Hydrants and ";titer '."airs
` teen report, a ated June . 6 9 * 2, on the su bJect 9 Tlydr:mits
and 'titer 1ali includtn recommendations for strengthenin the
water sumly system., submitted and filed.
T'I` ROP'.1rTTOT" OF ORz)T ?","'C S
Amendment to 7onin? Ord.
". - t `l"nt�uced by Councilman Shoemaker, seconded
by Councilman Brown,, entitled,
"ORDIDIA?-:C'" A -1": PDRIG ZONING ORDT" Ai TCE V0. 123 "'. C. y. RE:-
CLA5 1'FYINC THE R -2 .PORTION OF THE ARRA BOMDED BY
..
IR;V Hq -,ARD MD -.3AKT--;R STme:,,vrS TO Tip ;OU`1'F� --
EASTRitI;Y; RID OF BAKER STR PT '1L<JI�tG'_THE PROP: ITY LIT�I~ ;S
'foHICN., CONTIIi1zJ1� 7NTb P 9A11 STi��:T�:T TO H07,A.RD �TftT�: T TO AN
R -V b4tRICT OR Z07
e 11
..AS READ. ' ►D ORDERED POST TD DY ,6 .AFFTf :MTTV'- 'VOT'�S, 1 absentee.
ralar Ord.
b�.' � Rf.C.S. introduced by Councilman Adorns, seconded by
Cour_cilman`:bhtvobeda, entitled,
1B M4 ORDINANCE TO RTX AND ES THE 1:"TNIP ,IU'IIJI, i:�,AXII�tJj;
END R`A'TGE OF COIRPTW" "-A`I'ION, "ALARTT i ANIP AUTHO- 31"I`+'.D
20
.VID PROV URD TO ""r PAI TO T HE.' OFFICI✓M A':D
7 � T OF TUF CITY OF PFV�I LYU';C , .AI`s' D RE
P'!:AL ALL 0!RDI'!'l1•TC a'S V\TD /OR R OUTTIO "� IN
COI ri1;:�E:�TTI o re
was read and ordered published by 6 affirmative votes, 1 absentee.
Council,,mn Shoemaker refused to vote on said ordinance because he
stated he was not prepared to do so, 'whereupon the Clerk cast an
affirmative vote fox. said Council
AMPTIO OF ORDINIM'CES
Increase of garba • e collection fees '
it . - N.C.—S. i ntroduced W — C o — uncilman Schoeningh, seconded`
by Councilman Schwobeda, entitled..
t ° .a; ORDINANCE- .!�?`T�:TIllING SECTION 18 OF' T11F GARBAGE COLLECTION
0 E N -0. 173 'T >I.C.S. , FOR THF. TITTRPO` >E OF TNCRT ASING TIC:
CHARG-*,9 AI "D RAT: -S FOR THE COLL CTTON V ?D Ry ";OVAT, 0 GATinGE
!�P:?D RUB T`�1I F1110.1.1 5T GT�F- FA' ?TLY R : IDF. XF.c', ro
came tap regularly-and was adopted by 6 affirmative votes., 1 absentee,
COM OF UIF7.1 SMM 7JS ,�,
' cce ti.n ° .:ta Sevier
eso 70 r'..C.S.
introduced by Councilman Schivobeda, seconded by Councilman Adams,
entitled,
11, so lution acceptin ;cork of insta.11in.rf f.Iadison St Trunk
Sewer Line. ry
adapted by 6 affirmative votes, 1 absentee.
'- tevisin�. schedule of Ambulance Service fees
N
Res 0 S.
introduced by Councilman Shoemaker, seconded by Councilman kda
entitled,
ITResolution revisin-117 schedule of charges.for ambulance
service and overtime allowance for city employees , ed
therein, and repealing vi es. X697 1` .C. S ►4
adopted by 6 affirmative votes, 1 absentee.
Res. establish n7 _ annexation fees with drawn for revision
Resolution cetcrnining that a charge be h:. reafter made
for annexation of property to the City was withdrawn by Councilmen
Sch,vobeda, introducer, and Councilman Brown., seconder, and referred
to the City .Attorney for revision after it had n pointed out
that no provision hftd been made in the resolutig�, deeding of land
to the Ci.ty`An lieu of payment of cash fees.
The o } ove mot t;er of annexat�i.on fees was di.scias:sed` at len "'th
by member's of the CLt� .Co�ancll, T'lannin� Cor�raiasion, City lanager
arc: City attorney. 11r. Pa.sciorino or Lyle Taver?ett office,
rcpresentin? ? {ro Novak,, subdivider a protest for
:aro
1•:.ovgk.� the proposed annexation deem In connection with this
prot: Byce stated that when this. matter had been discussed
bet;reen $1r;. 'f3rshall, rcpresentia 7 pit, T-ovak, and the i lannin�
Co-n- nission., it had been indicated that "rd Novak ;mould dedicate
several acres of land for a park' in lieu ,of cash fees.
t the au estion of Coatei:ltban,. No�wvood, the Council was polled
as to the amount of annexation. fee and it was Indicated that a
majority were in favor of a fee of" ^30. instead of .. "250
5.
Rosenbloom annexation
es. 7- N.C.S.
introduced by Councilman Shoemaker, seconded by Councilman
Schwobeda, entitled,
"Resolution pomposing annexing of property to be known
as Rosenbloom Annexation,"
adopted by 6 affirmative votes, 1 absentee.
ter
-- Res i.3 �vaVoa.
introduced by Councilman Adams, seconded by Councilman Broim,
entitled,
°Resolution authorizing City Manager to sell Bruning
4H... Printer and 'Developer, together with assorted
pr intin supplies, to the highest bidder."
adopted by 6 affirmative votes, 1 absentee.
zing Cif ^ "fir. to se
Mthorizin T
adopted by 6 affir'ma.tive vot ;�,s, 1 absentee.
of Standard_ 4 9 C oronet" L?_ ca
-- - --- - -- -- - ii e s .
introduced. by 001arncilman schwobeda., s ^conded by Councilman
'iom Pntitled,
"'iesoDition authorizin- purchase of Standard "Coronet"
Uxnii cator. "
Re sale of Shoe Factor
er oo s reported trat the City �'x�� and
the Sono ma County Land Tit x r a
nwas
of the was Factory prop y
obtained no further action could be taken.
Rac:•cs for t, - s
e su ~ a on of Councilman Shoemaker that a rac'< be
provided for the maps In the Council rooms was referred to the
City °oana ger for action, who stated that this item is included
in the proposed budget of 1952
Re -« annexat fees on fending Pet itions
A scuss o e�" a ha ` as o �r -hey, ! er° or no annexation fees
would a pply against annexations which have been pending before
the C iao p r io r to thi ti me,, th is involving the petitions of
the Rosenbloom a►�nexation and the ;eahunta- Shields Amn.exation.
The City :gin stated that he wished to assume responsibility
for the delay in the ' ;:eahunt- :3t^ie1ds matters that due to an over -si.� ht
on his part, it had not clearee through his office as quickly cs
it sriould have.
The City :Ottorney pointed out th, t tt-le City council could
t.Ater of fees to apply against the two }nerd 3
decide on • the m g
anr.e at�.ans at the tt.me of t`le hearLng o� each annexation.
.�. There `6ein no farther busine to come before th
the �neetin? :vas adjourned to llon6y, June 25rd, 1 °52
of '7 30 P J'
4tT ,:�T:
e me
at the haur
40