HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Report 04/17/1989For Agenda Item No.
Dated: April 17, 1989
STAFF TO BE CONTACTED
Dennis DeWitt, Chief of Police
REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION
Approve RFP concept to research alternatitives to providing Animal Control
Services.
RECOMMENDATION
Recommend approval of action
BACKGROUND
See attached report
ALTERNATIVES
Continue as we are
CONSEQUENCES OF NOT ACTING
Possible increased expense to the City over the long range.
ACTION FOLLOWING ADOPTION
Staff will prepare RFP and a recommendation report
PETALUMA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Memorandum April 12, 1989
TO: Dennis DeWitt, Chief of Police
FROM: Patrick T. Parks, Captain
SUBJECT: ALTERNATIVE DELIVERY OF ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES
The purpose of this report is to update you as to the status of our Animal
Control Center and to examine possible solutions to problems currently being
experienced at the center. This report addresses the City Councils goal of
examining alternative means of animal control service delivery. The report
recommends that proposals for alternative service providers be sought prior to
implementing any major changes at the Animal Control Center.
The Petaluma Animal Control Center is a full service provider of Animal Control
Services to the City of Petaluma. The center falls under the supervision of
the Administrative Services Division of the Police Department. Services
provided at the Animal Control Center include: Shelter of stray animals,
adoption services, criminal investigation of animal related complaints,
trapping wild animals, caring for sick or injured animals, disposal of animal
carcasses, quarantine of animals involved in bite incidents and generally
responding to calls concerning domestic and wild animals. Employees at the
animal control center clean kennels, patrol city streets, respond to calls,
euthanize animals that cannot be'placed in a home and handle all animal control
licensing for the City of Petaluma. The Petaluma Animal Control Center also
houses animals that are picked up in the City of Cotati under a contractual
agreement. The Petaluma center is generally respected by other area animal
control centers as an agency that is professional and effective.
While the Petaluma Animal Control Center generally has a good reputation in the
County of Sonoma, it is not an agency without its problems. As the population
of Petaluma has grown, so has its population of domestic animals. As the
developed areas of the city have encroached on local pastures and woodlands
wild animals displaced by loss of habitat have also created additional work-
load for Animal Control Staff. The Animal control facility is operating near
functional capacity and in need of repair and enlargement. Attracting and
keeping qualified animal control personnel has been a problem primarily due to
general working conditions and the necessity to euthanize animals that are sick
or cannot be placed in homes. Animal control is currently working short
staffed due to one vacancy that the Police Department has had difficulty
filling and the stress disability of one employee.
Problems at the Animal Control Center are not a new phenomenon. In past years
stress disability, low moral, and employee turnover have occurred sporadically
at the center. Workload demands created by these problems are often shifted
directly to patrol officers at the Police department, causing an additional
strain on emergency response personnel. Needless to say, Animal Control
TO: Dennis DeWitt, Chief of Police April 12, 1989
RE: ALTERNATIVE DELIVERY OF ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES
PAGE Two
related duties are not popular with most Police Officers who are not dressed,
trained, or equipped to handle many animal related calls.
Given the past and current problems at the Animal Control Center, as we 11. -as
the strain of handling Animal Control Services on the Police Department, the
time to search for a long range solution to Animal Control Services has
arrived. Prior to adding personnel to animal control and the construction
of a proposed 1.5 million dollar new facility (or the addition of office space
at the center as a temporary solution) the City must first examine its
commitment to maintaining its own Animal Control Center. An examination of
Animal Control priorities and researching alternative delivery systems, at this
time, may prove very useful to current budget planning and long range financial
planning.
The primary area that should be studied as a result of this report is the
contracting out of all or part of Petaluma animal control services to an
outside provider. Many cities such as Santa Rosa, Novato and San Rafael
currently contract with the Humane Society for these services. Rohnert Park
contracts with the Humane Society to run their shelter. Contracting out all or
part of the City of Petaluma's animal control services may actually save the
city money in the long run with little, if any, loss of service to the
community.
There are two providers in our area who are interested in bidding on services
for the City of Petaluma. These agencies are Sonoma County Animal Control and
the Sonoma County Humane Society. Representatives from both agencies have been
contacted and have expressed genuine interest in contracting with the City of
Petaluma to provide animal control services.
In conclusion it is apparent that, while the Petaluma Animal Control Center has
provided excellent service to the City in the past, the ability of the center
to continue this level of services to the community will be directly
proportional to the financial commitment the City is willing to make to animal
control. Given problems of City growth, employee turnover, disability, and the
need for a new facility the financial commitment will be substantial. Under
present circumstances and based on the experiences of other cities, it makes
good business sense to look at alternative providers for animal control
services for the City of Petaluma.
RECOMMENDATION - A Request For Proposal should be drawn up by representatives
of the Personnel Department, the Police Department and City Attorney's Office
to solicit bids for providing Animal Control Services to the City of Petaluma.
Once these bids are received the Police Department will prepare a report to the
City Council comparing costs and advantages of providing our own Animal Control
Services vs. contracting with an outside provider. Various alternatives will
be examined by the Police Department with recommendations made to the City
Council by June 15, 1989.
Patrick T. Parks, Captain
Administrative Services
Division Commander
PTP:bem