HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Report 3.B 10/01/2018DATE: October 1, 2018
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: John C. Brown, City Manager �
SUBJECT: Resolution Opposing Proposition 6: Voter Approval for Future Gas and Vehicle
Taxes and 2017 Tax Repeal Initiative
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution Opposing Proposition 6:
Voter Approval for Future Gas and Vehicle Taxes and 2017 Tax Repeal Initiative.
BACKGROUND
In April 2017, the Legislature enacted Senate Bill 1. The bill provides approximately $5 billion
annually to restore state highway and local road systems, and includes over $390 million per year
for the Bay Area. SB 1 dedicates funding to roadway maintenance, public transit, congestion
reduction, and bike and pedestrian safety.
SB 1 is funded by adjustments to roadway user fees assessed on gasoline, diesel fuel and motor
vehicles. New revenue measures contained in SB 1. include:
• A 12-cent/gallon increase in the state's gasoline excise tax. This amounts to an inflation
adjustment to restore the purchasing power lost since the gas tax was last raised in 1994.
• A Transportation Improvement Fee, an annual vehicle registration surcharge which varies
based on the value of the vehicle and depreciates over time.
• A zero -emission vehicle registration surcharge of $100 per year
• A 20-cent/gallon increase in the diesel excise tax
• A four (4) percent rate increase in the sales tax on diesel fuel
Proposition 69, approved by 81 percent of voters in June 2018, added a provision to the
California Constitution ensuring SB 1 funding sources cannot be diverted to any non -
transportation purpose.
State highway and local road systems currently face maintenance backlogs of $59 billion and
$78 billion, respectively. The Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), the
transportation planning, financing, and coordinating agency for the nine county Bay Area,
maintains statistics on road conditions for each jurisdiction in the region, and awards them an
annual score on their pavement condition index (PCI). In 2017, MTC awarded an overall
average PCI of 67 out of 100 possible points to the region. A PCI of 67 is considered "fair".
Many jurisdictions have much lower scores, with 22 percent of them already ranking in the poor
or failing category. Petaluma is among these, with a 2017 PCI of 46. MTC estimates the value
of Petaluma's roadway maintenance backlog at approximately $171 million.
Bay Area cities and counties are forecasted to receive $208 million from SB 1 in FY 2018/19, a
73 percent increase in their baseline state gas tax funding. This can be spent on road
maintenance and rehabilitation, safety, railroad grade separations, traffic control devices and
complete streets components, including pedestrian and bicycle safety projects. Petaluma's share
of that funding for FY 2018/19 is approximately $1.1 million. Although calculating Petaluma's
share of increased funding from SB 1 for transit is more complicated, staff estimates an annual
average increase of approximately $586,000, per year.
DISCUSSION
An initiative petition was submitted to the Secretary of State adding Proposition 6 (Prop 6) to the
November 2018 ballot. If approved by voters, Prop 6 would eliminate road repair and
transportation funding enacted by Senate Bill 1 in 2017 by repealing revenues dedicated for
those purposes. Prop 6 would also subject any fitture tax on motor vehicles or fuel to a vote of
the people.
Without SB 1 funding, pavement conditions can be expected to further deteriorate, as
maintenance backlogs increase. Public transit systems will face tighter budgets that could
require cuts in service, and delays to vehicle procurements and in addressing State of Good
Repair transit program priorities. Much needed congestion relief projects and transit system
expansions also would be delayed.
The greatest negative impact of an SB 1 repeal would be the on the condition of local streets and
roads. As previously noted, 22 percent of local roadways in the Bay Area are already classified
as being in poor or failed condition. MTC estimates the loss of SB 1 funding would lower the
region's PCI to 58 by 2027 and increase the share of poor or failed conditions to 36 percent in
that time. MTC estimates that the loss of SB 1 funds would drive up the backlog of local road
maintenance by $3.9 billion over 10 years and would cost more than twice that amount to restore
conditions to what they are today.
If Prop 6 passes, the Bay Area will lose $156 million in new State Transit Assistance (STA)
funds for FY 2018-19. Of this, $118 million augments the existing STA program and can be used
on any transit agency needs. Another $38 million would fund a new State of Good Repair transit
program, which is limited to capital uses such as replacing vehicles and upgrading facilities.
Passage of Prop 6 would also result in funding gaps for priority congestion relief projects in the
Bay Area. In its first award of competitive funds from SB 1 programs, the MTC awarded Bay
Area projects $660 million, more than 25 percent of the statewide total. The MTC also awarded
Caltrans $85 million through the Solutions for Congested Corridors program to complete the
final Sonoma County portion of the multi -phase widening of U.S. 101 through the Marin -
Sonoma Narrows, and Petaluma.
Under SB 1, a State -Local Partnership Program was revived that rewards communities in which
voters have approved measures that dedicate funding for transportation. Prop 6 would eliminate
the only sources of funding for that program.
2
Petaluma's Streets Fund budgets for 2018/19 total $5.42 million. The revenues supporting those
budgets include the proceeds from gas tax, franchise fees, and Measure M funding. Gas tax
estimates include nearly $1.1 million in SB 1 funding. SB 1 funding represents over 43 percent
of total gas tax revenue, and increases the City's baseline gas tax by 73 percent. These monies
have been directed to the City's capital improvement program for Streets, and are being used to
support various pavement restoration projects totaling $1.5 million in 2018/19. A list of these
projects can be found on Page CIP-60 of the City's 2018/19 adopted budget. Prop 6 would
eliminate this $1.1 million per year funding source, and further impair the City's ability to
address its deferred street maintenance needs. MTC estimates that even with SB 1 funding,
Petaluma's current street maintenance backlog of $171 million will increase to $290 million by
2027. If Prop 6 passes, Petaluma's backlog is projected to increase to $322 million. In the same
10 -year period, Petaluma's PCI is projected to decrease from 46 to 40 with SB 1 funding, and to
34 without SB 1 funding.
Staff estimates that Petaluma's transit system will lose an average of approximately $586,000 a
year, if Prop 6 passes. Some of this money would be used to meet the division's funding reserve
requirements. Without SB 1 funding, Transit will not be able to meet those requirements and
may need to reduce existing route service levels and delay capital projects. If SB 1 is repealed,
staff estimates Transit will lose approximately $4.7 million through 2027. Without this funding
source, transit system improvements such as more service hours or partnerships, and capital
improvements such as rolling stock purchases or bus stop improvements will be much less likely.
Finally, Prop. 6 will eliminate the only currently identified source of funding to provide the $85
million needed to complete the Marin -Sonoma Narrows project. That project will widen
Highway 101 through Petaluma and add an HOV lane and sound walls for noise attenuation, and
reduce congestion by eliminating the existing two-lane bottleneck.
For the foregoing reasons, it is recommended that the City Council support SB 1 by adopting the
attached resolution opposing Proposition 6. It should be noted that information regarding SB 1
funding is and will be posted on the Public Works and Utilities Department's website, and
acknowledgement of the use of the funding source is identified at related project sites.
FINANCIAL IMPACTS
Proposition 6 would reduce Petaluma's annual gas tax apportionment by approximately $1.1
million per year, and State Transit Assistance funding by an average of 586,000 per year. It
would also eliminate $85 million that is currently authorized to complete the Marin -Sonoma
Narrows project.
ATTACHMENTS
1, Resolution
3
ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION OPPOSING PROPOSITION 6: VOTER APPROVAL FOR
FUTURE GAS AND VEHICLE TAXES AND 2017 TAX REPEAL
INITIATIVE
WHEREAS, Senate Bill 1 (SB 1), the Road Repair and Accountability Act, was signed
into law by the Governor in April 2017 to address a backlog of streets and roads repair and
maintenance, and to address significant multi -modal transportation shortfalls and congestion
management statewide; and
WHEREAS, approximately $78 billion in funding is needed on a statewide basis for
local streets and roads, and $59 billion is needed to restore the State highway system; and
WHEREAS, statewide, SB 1 will provide over $1 billion annually for state and local
roadway system maintenance and rehabilitation, safety improvements, traffic control devices and
complete streets components, including pedestrian and bicycle safety projects; and
WHEREAS, regionally, SB 1 will provide $208 million for local roadway system
maintenance and rehabilitation, safety improvements, traffic control devices and complete streets
components, including pedestrian and bicycle safety projects; and
WHEREAS, SB 1 will provide $15.2 million annually to Sonoma County and its cities
for local roadway system repairs, maintenance, and improvements, including approximately $1.1
million a year for Petaluma; and
WHEREAS, regionally the average pavement condition index (PCI) score is 67 out of a
total score of 100, which is in the "fair", but several jurisdictions' scores are below 50, the "poor
or failing category; and
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Planning Commission has estimated Petaluma's 2017
roadway maintenance backlog at $171 million; and
WHEREAS, for 2017, the City of Petaluma had an overall PCI rating of 46 out of 100
which is in the" poor -to -failing" category; and
WHEREAS, Proposition 6 will eliminate SB 1 funding currently dedicated to fixing
roads and potholes, reducing traffic congestion and upgrading freeways, bridges, tunnels and
overpasses to make them safer, and for multi -modal transportation; and
WHEREAS, it is anticipated if Proposition 6 passes that the City of Petaluma will lose
approximately $10 million in roadway maintenance funding by 2027, its unfunded maintenance
backlog will increase to $340 million, and its PCI will decrease to 34; and
WHEREAS, if Proposition 6 passes, Petaluma will also lose an average of $586,000 per
year in transit funding and approximately $4.7 million through 2027; and
4
WHEREAS, the $85 million awarded to Caltrans for the Sonoma -Marin Narrow project
will no longer be available and identifying replacement funding will further delay the much-
needed congestion relief that project will provide.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of
Petaluma opposes Proposition 6 on the November 6, 2018 statewide ballot.