Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Report 5.B 03/18/2019 Late Doc 1Document Received After Agenda Distribution - Agenda Item 5.A/5.B March 15, 2019 Subject: Item 5A - Resolution Approving a Request to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for the Allocation of Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Transportation Development Act Article 3 Pedestrian/Bicycle Project Funding & 513 - Resolution to Approve the Proposed Project List for Fiscal Year 19/20, Per the Requirements of Senate Bill 1 to Obtain Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account Funds Dear Petaluma City Councilmembers: I'm writing to suggest possible alternatives to staff recommendations submitted for Transportation Development Act Article 3 (TDA3) funding. My primary concern --in addition to the fact that this was not reviewed by our Pedestrian and Bicycle Advisory Committee (PBAC), or informed by its input --is that the projects were selected with maintenance as the driving factor, rather than safety. Between 2006-17, there were 232 collisions reported in Petaluma involving drivers and pedestrians, resulting in 242 injuries and nine deaths. At least 57 percent of these collisions occurred in crosswalks.' This does not include a recent collision at East Washington and Vallejo Streets that left a 77 year-old woman hospitalized. One of the simplest ways to increase the rate at which drivers yield to pedestrians crossing is to install Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFB) or Overhead (HAWK) Beacons. Studies on the impacts of both treatments have shown remarkable increases in the rates at which drivers yield, and, consequently, reductions in collisions.2 s There are several uncontrolled crosswalks around the City that are deserving candidates for these improvements, especially along high speed corridors where the consequences of collisions are most severe. Collision data for the available years (2006-17) suggests that the following crosswalks should be prioritized: 1. East Washington & Wilson: 3 Collisions, 4 Injuries 2. East Washington & Keokuk: 2 Collisions, 2 Injuries 3. Petaluma Blvd & Cherry St: 2 Collisions, 3 Injuries 4. Petaluma Blvd & G St: 2 Collisions, 2 Injuries ' Source: Transportation Injury Mapping System. CVC Violations 21950 (Driver must yield to pedestrian right of way in a crosswalk) and 21951 (Crosswalk, overtaking and passing vehicle stopped for pedestrian within). 2 RRFBs: https://safetv.fhwa.dot.aov/intersection/conventional/unsianalized/tech Burn/fhwasa09009/ 3 HAWK: httos://www.fhwa.dot.aov/publications/research/safetv/10045/ 5. East Washington & Vallejo St: 1 Collision, 1 Injury (2006-17), plus the aforementioned collision that took place in February 2019 This list of locations and the improvements described above are by no means exhaustive, but could be a helpful starting point due to the frequency with which people are hit and injured in crosswalks. There are many types of other projects --protected bike lanes, new crosswalks, curb ramps, etc. --that should always be considered for TDA3 and other bike/ped funds. None of this is to say that maintenance and safety aren't related. Lynch Creek Trail's disrepair frequently comes up at our PBAC meetings --it is undoubtedly a worthy project and committee priority. I cannot, however, recall Prince Park Trail ever being discussed within my two -plus year tenure. TDA3 is one of just a few reliable bicycle and pedestrian funding sources available to the City to quickly implement safety improvements, which is why I believe it's worth considering whether pathway maintenance funding can instead be delivered through Senate Bill 1 funds (outlined in Item 5B on the agenda) and/or Measure M (Parks). With the City set to spend over $2.3m on street maintenance and repair in FY19/20, surely a small portion can go towards pathway projects? Looking at the bigger picture, I would once again like to call out the need for an updated Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan that provides a better overview of safety and maintenance priorities to help inform funding decisions moving forward. Our existing plan was adopted in 2008 and is in dire need of an update. Respectfully Submitted, Bjorn Griepenburg Cc: Dan St. John, Director, Public Works & Utilities Gina Benedetti-Petnic, City Engineer Jeff Stutsman, Senior Civil Engineer Pedestrian & Bicycle Advisory Committee