HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 98-061 04/20/1998 Resolution No. 9a-sl N.C.S.
of the City of Petaluma, California
1 GRANTING 1999 ALLOCATIONS
2
3 WHEREAS, the City Council adopted a Residential Growth Management System and established
a the procedure for granting the allocation pool on a yearly basis with Ordinance 1716 N.C.S.
5 (Municipal Code Chapter 1726}; and
6
7 WHEREAS, interested developers and/or property owners filed their Notice of Intent to Develop
8 forms in accordance with the provisions of Ordinance 1716 N.C.S. and these, in combination with
9 reservations made the previous year and regulatory obligations for smaller in-fill projects,
to comprise the total number of allocation requests for 1999; and
11
12 WHEREAS, the total number of allocation requests equals 244 units; and
13
la WHEREAS, the 1999 allocation pool was set at 89 allocations; and
15
16 WHEREAS, the City Council finds that granting allocations does not constitute a project
v pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Section 15061, and, therefore, no
18 environmental action is necessary at this time;
19
20 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council grants the year 1999 allocations
21 and-the year 2000 reservations, as described below based on the findings that follow:
zz
23
24 Project Name 1999 Allocations
25 Cross Creek 44*
26 Reserved for in-fill 45**
27 Total 89
28
29 Reservations for 2000
3o Willow Glen 11
31 Total 11
32
33 * 40 previously reserved
34 Minimum amount required by Ordinance for exempt in-fill development.
35
36 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council makes the following findings in support of
37 its 1999 allocations:
38
Resolution No: 98-s1 N.C.S. Pflge 1 Of Z
1
I Findines
3 1. The number oP 1999 allocations granted is consistent with the provisions of the K'esidential
a Growth Management System (Mwiicipal Code Chapter 1726) and the applicable goals,
5 objectives, policies and programs of the 1987-2005 Petaluma General Plan.
6
7 2. The decision to grant 1999 allocations as specified is not detrimental to the public health,
8 safety, or welfare when viewed in context of the City's overall growth rate, adequacy of
9 public facilities, and subsequent environmental review procedures to which each project is
Io subjected.
11
t2 3. There is no known need for secondary ("special") allocations. in the foreseeable future.
t3
la 4. The reason for denying the allocation request for theHeritage project is because the project is
15 currently approadiing the completion of the review process and, if approved by the City
16 Council in 1998, will "lock-in" allocations.
17
IS 5. There is no compelling reason to deny allocations forany other request.
19
20
2I
22 d:Avcs~alores99
Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City.
REFEF2ENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution wes introduced and adopted by the Approved as to
Council2~the City of Petaluma at n (R@eular) meeting fO1~
on the day of ..........A._PCil........................................, 19........, by the
following vote:
City Attorney
AYES: KELLER, TORLIATT, HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR MAGUIRE
NOES: READ; STOMPE
ABSENT: MAY R HI SS
ATTEST: / _
qty Clerk r
f Cat May r
Council File..
98-6L.... Nss
('A IONS gev. Nn_. .