HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Report 5.B 05/06/2019a �
I85$
DATE: May 6, 2019
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT
Agenda Item #5.8
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council through City Manager '—
Heather Hines, Planning Manager
Resolutions to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Approve a Residential
Density Bonus Housing Agreement and Development Concession for the
DeCristo Multi -Family Residential Project at 109 Ellis Street.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve Resolutions to Adopt a Mitigated Negative
Declaration and Approve a Residential Density Bonus Housing Agreement and Development
Concession for the DeCristo Multi -Family Residential Project at 109 Ellis Street.
BACKGROUND
Project Description
The proposed DeCristo Multi -Family project consists of a multi -family residential development
including 13 apartments units, including one unit offered at the very low-income level pursuant
to a proposed density bonus housing agreement. Twelve of the proposed units are two-bedroom
units, and one unit is a one -bedroom unit. The very low-income unit will be one of the two-
bedroom units.
The project proposes development of three, three-story buildings and common outdoor areas
including an in -ground swimming pool, on-site parking, landscaping, a bioretention/detention
basin, and ancillary improvements. Offsite improvements include streetscape landscaping
improvements along the project's Ellis Street frontage, extension of utility service laterals, and
installation of an 8 -foot wide pervious pathway along the full extent of the site frontage along
Washington Creek.
The project is subject to Site Plan and Architectural Review for the new construction.
Additionally, a Density Bonus has been requested to allow for an increased density of 18.43
units per acre in exchange for offering one unit at the very low-income level and a development
concession/incentive to reduce the number of onsite parking spaces from the 25 required by code
to 22 parking spaces. A more indepth project description is included in the Planning Commission
staff report dated April 9, 2019 (Attachment 3) and the project plans are provided at Attachment
8.
Planning Commission Hearing
On April 9, 2019, the Planning Commission considered the project and approved a resolution
recommending the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration with modifications to
select mitigation measures contained in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.
Additionally, the Commission approved a resolution recommending the City Council approve
the Residential Density Bonus Housing Agreement associated with the proposed residential
development. Both resolutions were approved unanimously by the six commissioners present at
the April 9, 2019 hearing.
The Planning Commission directed staff to make the following modifications to mitigation
measures outlined in the MMRP in forwarding the document to the Council for consideration:
1. Add further specificity to mitigation measure CUL -1 regarding any accidental discovery
of archeological artifacts during project ground disturbing activities.
2. Specify which County agency to contact to cap the existing on-site well (HAZ-2) and
regarding the discovery of any buried holding tanks (HAZ-3).
3. Limit construction hours to between 7:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m., Monday through Friday and
between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on Saturday. In addition to prohibiting project
construction on State, Federal, and Local holidays, prohibit construction on Sundays
(NOI-1.1).
4. Expand the required outreach notification of construction activities to include owners and
occupants within a 500 -foot radius of the project site (NOI-1.13 and NOI-1.14).
The MMRP (Exhibit 1 of Attachment 1) has been updated to reflect the Planning Commission's
direction on the project's mitigation measures. All changes are noted as underline edits.
Also at the April 9`h Planning Commission hearing, the Commission provided feedback to the
applicant on the project's design and suggested the applicant consider the following design
modifications:
1. Consider modifications to the massing of the building facade facing Ellis Street to better
articulate the elevation to read as a front elevation instead of a side elevation.
2. The facade facing Ellis Street is not evocative of Petaluma architecture and needs to be
more engaging with the street — particularity at the ground -floor level.
3. Explore less visually prominent locations for the project transformer, backflow
prevention device, and other utilities located in the landscaped front setback. If re-
location is not an option for these features, provide an explanation to why the features
cannot be located in less visually prominent locations.
4. Explore options to incorporate the existing water tank into the site's design, re -locate it
offsite, or incorporate the water tank materials into the site design (such as fencing).
However, the condition of the water tank was questioned as potentially not practical to
repurpose into the project design.
5. Provide additional privacy for the ground -floor unit located in Building B.
6. The project materials and siding need upgrading.
7. Explore options to better compliment the architectural style of the multi -family buildings
located immediately to the north of the project site.
I
8. Re -consider the proposed color palette for the project.
The Planning Commission will formally consider the SPAR application at a future Planning
Commission meeting should the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and
approve the Residential Density Bonus Housing Agreement.
Regulatory Framework
As required by Chapter 27 of the Implementing Zoning Ordinance (IZO), a Density Bonus
Housing Agreement must be approved by City Council and recorded prior to formal action on a
development project's entitlement requests for projects proposing a residential density bonus and
development concessions/incentives. A residential density bonus and a development
concession/incentive have been requested for the subject project; therefore, the City Council's
decision on the Density Bonus Housing Agreement is the first formal action that will occur with
the project. Accordingly, the City Council must also consider the Mitigated Negative Declaration
that was prepared for the project at the same meeting as the Density Bonus Housing Agreement is
being considered.
The project will also require approval of a Site Plan and Architectural Review (SPAR) application.
The Planning Commission will formally consider the SPAR application at a future publicly noticed
public hearing should the City Council adopt the project's Mitigated Negative Declaration and
approve the project's Residential Density Bonus Agreement.
DISCUSSION
Environmental Review
A Draft Initial Study was prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) on March 19, 2019. A Notice of Intent to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration was
distributed and posted with California State Clearing House and the Sonoma County Clerk's Office
on March 22, 2019, initiating a 30 -day comment period, which was completed on April 22, 2019.
The proposed project has been determined that it could result in potentially significant impacts
related to Air Quality, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology/Soils, Hydrology, and
Noise. The Initial Study found that project impacts would be mitigated to a less -than -significant
level through implementation of recommended mitigation measures or through compliance with
existing Municipal Code requirements or City standards. The applicant has agreed to implement
the mitigation measures identified and contained in the project's Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program. Attachment 1 Exhibit I contains the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative
Declaration, as well as the proposed Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.
Public Comments received regarding the project's environmental review have been included in
Attachment 7. Staff has provided responses to the public comment regarding the project's
environmental review immediately below.
A number of the commenters stated that they believed that the project did not contain enough
parking and that the existing street parking supply was already low in the neighborhood. It should
be noted that street parking is not an issue that is analyzed under CEQA. The granting of the
reduction in onsite parking from 25 to 22 spaces as a development concession/incentive is
3
consistent with application of density bonus regulations under state law and Chapter 27 of the
Implementing Zoning Ordinance.
Related to traffic and circulation comments, the project's Initial Study Section 4.17
(Transportation) found that the project would result in a less than significant impact to
transportation. The Initial Study noted that the project would be consistent with General Plan -
mandated level -of -service standards, would not necessitate the completion of a transportation
study due to the limited number of vehicle trips being added by the project, and would not result
in safety issues, including emergency access, as concluded by the City's Public Works Department
and Fire Department.
Staff was able to confirm that the project would not be subject to an Army Corp of Engineers
Permit as all improvements in the creek area (including water in -flow and out -flow devices for
the stormwater system) are located above the high-water mark of Washington Creek.
Comments were raised specific to the Initial Study's analysis of cultural and archeologic
resources and historic resources. The comment raised for each item is contained immediately
below with the staff response following.
Cultural and Archeological Resources
Comment: The commenter states that it is "surprising than an archaeological study was not
completed for the proposed project" and asserts that an archaeological study should be
completed by a qualified archaeologist in accordance with General Plan Policy 3 -P -1-J.
Response: City practice is to require a Cultural Resources Study when projects proposed
development in archeologically sensitive areas which includes undisturbed lands in the vicinity
of ridgetops, mid -slope terraces, alluvial flats, ecotones, and sources of water. The project is not
located in an area that is considered archeologically sensitive and was not subject to a Cultural
Resources Study. The project site and vicinity has been subject to ground disturbance including
past agricultural activities and residential development. The project site includes Washington
Creek, which is an engineered channel, maintained by the Sonoma County Water Agency for
flood control purposes and has periodically undergone channel maintenance. Furthermore, the
City notified the Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria (FIGR) in accordance with AB 52
notification procedures and did not receive a request to consult indicating that the project site and
vicinity does not contain sensitive Tribal Cultural Resources. The project site is not undisturbed
and is not considered an archeologically sensitive area. Nonetheless, as stated in the Draft Initial
Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (page 28, Exhibit 1 of Attachment 1), the project will
result in ground disturbing activities during construction activities and could result in potentially
significant impacts to buried cultural resources, if present. As such, Mitigation Measures CUL -1
is set forth in the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and provides for protection of
archeological resources should such resources be encountered during construction. Mitigation
Measure CUL -I has been augmented as directed by the Planning Commission to provide
additional detail on the types of cultural materials that could be encountered. Modified language
is set forth in the revised MMRP.
11
Historic Resources
Comment: The commenter disagrees with the Historic Resources Evaluation finding that the
tankhouse does not qualify as a CEQA historical resource. The commenter asserts that the
tankhouse at the project site potentially represents a historic property type that "embodies the
distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or region" (CEQA Guidelines Section
15064.5(a)(3)(c)).
Master Response: A Historic Resources Evaluation (HRE) was required because the project
includes the proposed demolition of buildings and structures that were constructed prior to 1945
(City Council Resolution No 2017-122 N.C.S (Demo Policy)). The HRE, provided as
Attachment D to the Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, includes a full
assessment of eligibility for listing on the California Register of Historic Resources and presents
the evaluation of significance beginning on page 6. Criterion 3 was specifically assessed to
evaluate whether the tankhouse embodies distinctive characteristics of a type and whether it
represents a particularly good example of a Northern California tank house. Based on review of
available online resources, correspondence with Tom Cooper (who has documented tank houses
and published a book about Northern California Tank Houses), review of the Caltrans State -
Wide historic context for agriculture, there was no indication that the tankhouse onsite was a
particularly good or distinctive example of a type. The tankhouse on the subject property is of a
type that is relatively common to agricultural properties of that era and does not warrant a
determination of historical significance based on architectural merit alone. Furthermore, the
finding that the tankhouse lacked historical significance was also informed by the fact that many
of the associated features of the original agricultural property are no longer present. As such, the
tankhouse lacks much of its original context snaking it less able to readily convey its historic
function and operation. Therefore, the HRE concludes that the buildings and structures onsite
including the tankhouse do not qualify as eligible or potentially eligible for listing on California
Register of Historic Resources at the local, state or national level.
Density Bonus Housing Agreement
IZO Chapter 27 (Density Bonus) is intended to provide incentives for the production of housing
for Very Low, Low Income, Moderate or Senior Housing in accordance with California state law.
By virtue of providing for certain levels of affordable housing in a development project, a project
is eligible to exceed the density allowed by the applicable zoning and General Plan land use
designation and receive a prescribed number of development incentives or concessions. The IZO
defines a development incentive/concession as follows:
Concession or Incentive. Used interchangeably means such regulatory
concessions as specified in California Government Code Section 65915
subdivisions (d) and (h) including, but not limited to, the reduction of site
development standards or zoning code requirements, direct financial assistance,
approval of mixed use zoning in conjunction with the Housing Development, or any
other regulatory incentive which would result in identifiable cost avoidance or
reductions that are offered in addition to a Density Bonus. See Section 27.070 of
this chapter.
5
IZO §27.070 identifies development concessions or incentives that a project can utilize including
the following: reduced minimum lot sizes and/or dimensions; reduced minimum lot setbacks;
reduced minimum outdoor and/or private outdoor living area; increased maximum lot coverage;
increased maximum building height and/or stories; reduced on-site parking standards, including
the number or size of spaces and garage requirements; reduced minimum building separation
requirements; reduced street standards, e.g., reduced minimum street widths.
IZO §27.040 establishes the potential development bonus and number of incentives that a project
could receive by providing on-site affordable units at certain levels of affordability. The table
below shows how the inclusion of a very affordable unit(s) can yield development bonuses and
incentives for project.
Percentage V ry Low Income Percentage Den its Bonus Number Ofr Incentives or Concessions
Units
w6%u . _
YU
f
$' `iix 7
1 '+K, 32 6%
2
��.,__„�....,���n...,..,.,�...,��,,.���,mm_..�T��..m,mm,s,,...s„�.,.......,��. ..................�m.^M�..,...,� .__.........�s��-,.-...�mm.,....,.,.,�m_____��....m................. ......� ..,
The project proposes to utilize the residential density bonus provisions allowed by California state
law and Chapter 27 of the IZO by providing for one on-site affordable unit at the very -low income
level — an amount equal to eight percent of the base number of units (12 units) allowed by the
zoning/land use designation at the project site. The inclusion of the on-site very affordable unit
also allows the project to request one development concession or incentive and a residential density
bonus of 27.5 percent as allowed by IZO §27.040. A parking reduction has been sought by the
applicant as the development concession/incentive. Below is a tabular summary of how Chapter
27 applies to the project.
3
RESIDENTIAL DENSITY BONUS SUMMARY
Standard Project Description
Base Project Size (Number 12 The number of units proposed in the
of Units) project prior to receiving an eligible
density bonus
Affordable Units Proposed 1
The number of units in the base project
(Very Low)
that shall be dedicated for the required
term pursuant to CA Government Code
§65915(c) to very low-income
households (i.e. those earning up to 50%
of the Area Median Income Level as
published and periodically updated by
the CA Department of Housing and
Urban Development)
Amount of Density Bonus 27.5%
The amount of density bonus, calculated
Available (3 market rate DB
pursuant to CA Government Code
units allowed; 1
§65915 and IZO, for which the applicant
market -rate DB
is eligible.
unit proposed)
Available I
The number of incentives/concessions
Incentives/Concessions
for which the project is eligible.
Eligible Parking Ratio 1 Bdrm 1
Reduced parking equal to three parking
space/unit
spaces has been requested by the
applicant, which would reduce the
2 Bdrm 2
required off-street vehicular parking
spaces/unit
requirement for the project from 25 to 22
spaces.
Supporting information for The project includes a request for the following
requested Incentives/Concessions that result in identifiable and actual
Incentives/Concessions cost reductions to provide for affordable housing costs:
• Reduced total vehicular parking space requirement
from 25 total spaces to 22 total spaces.
Applicants for a density bonus, incentive/concession must enter into a Density Bonus Housing
Agreement (Agreement) with the City that is subject to approval by the City Council. The approval
of the Agreement shall take place prior to approval of Site Plan and Architectural Review. Related
to this project, the City Council must first approve the Agreement prior to the Planning
Commission formally taking action of the project's SPAR request. The Agreement must run with
the land to be developed and be binding on all future owners and successors in interest. Notably,
the Agreement must stipulate that the term of use restrictions for restricted affordable units for at
least 30 years for Very Low units. Following execution of the Agreement by all parties, the
completed Agreement shall be recorded on the parcel to be developed.
IZO Chapter 27 stipulates that the affordable units must be consistent with the general size and
layout of market rate units in the proposed project. Therefore, the agreement includes the
requirement that the affordable unit shall be a two-bedroom unit consistent with the majority of
units proposed in the project. The one -bedroom unit proposed on the ground floor of Building B
shall not be the affordable unit.
Staff believes all requirements of the Density Bonus ordinance have been addressed with the
proposed project. There is no provision that allows the City to require the project to incorporate
the full maximum density bonus allowed under the ordinance. A draft resolution approving the
Density Bonus Housing Agreement is provided at Attachment X for the Council's consideration.
PUBLIC OUTREACH
The applicant held a neighborhood outreach meeting on February 21, 2019 as required by the City.
The meeting was held from 6 to 8p.m. at the Community Center. The meeting was attended by 17
people. All property owners and occupants within 1,000 feet of the project site were notified of
the meeting. A summary of the meeting from the project applicant and comments from the meeting
can be found in Attachment 6.
Several members of the public spoke at the public hearing before the Planning Commission.
Comments focused on concerns about traffic and parking in the surrounding neighborhood and
overall design compatibility of the project with neighboring residential uses. More specifically,
comments focused on architectural style, privacy, and massing.
A notice of public hearing was published in the Argus Courier on April 25, 2019 and mailed to all
property owners and occupants within 1,000 feet of the project site. Additionally, a public hearing
sign was installed on site consistent with City Council Resolution No. 2018-107 N.C.S.
As of the time of the writing of this staff report, six public comment letters have been received and
have been included in Attachment 7. Concerns with traffic/circulation, parking, archeological
resources, architectural/cultural resources, Anny Corp permitting process, architecture, privacy,
building size/height, water conservation with proposed pool, and disabled access were expressed
in the public comment.
FINANCIAL IMPACTS
The project is a cost recovery project with time and materials paid for by the applicant in line
with the cost recovery agreement on file for the project.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution Adopting Mitigated Negative Declaration
Exhibit I- IS/MND
Exhibit 2 - MMRP
2. Resolution Approving the Residential Density Bonus Agreement
n.
Exhibit 1 — Residential Density Bonus Agreement
3. Planning Commission Staff Report Dated April 9, 2019
4. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2019-05
5. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2019-06
6. Neighborhood Outreach Meeting Summary from Applicant
7. Public Comments
8. Project Plans
I
HmEi T 1
MIA
R 11111,
ow IiiAIIIII f
:
ca aininf '*ee t 1, s com. rise
8 t hree*-*s"or,y bui*ldin
-ing spaces, and
ve pal x
site im roveme S I
I
9 00%
in total of Ij resi'Identi*al units
2,2 ol""'410 street
Fk
landscaDln,. W ID
Overlylocated on a 0,,70,5* -acre site 10:9: E
allis
m
WHk;REAS,the A 7 e
Pis to the : Plan 'b'J,
Cityonan:
WHE AS5 in eva,lu
tial Stu includi"ng brUt no,
ci re
incorporated herein y ,I, e
goo
Mii Una
�I
Hrm
1140dal III ml I �Rll A
Im MIM#16q1r#j rial
v
Will
"W T
� i
Nd 44
NEEL.
%YAK �'RN-VrAk-%
A M&e FA
='I ibb nw 47M4 " Ban"li1.
Housing Pro duct i*on,).
c,. The Project is consistent with all development standards of the Residential 4 (R4) zoning
Idheight,districtCIingUd but not. limited to t.hose pertaining to uses, setbacks bui ing,
floor area ratio., and parking,
II
C.
TA
UJ I LKWILIMMIN.r I
As
I -Awl My
I)e,partment, I'I.English St. Petaluma, CA 949520
9
UE
0
Irl
61. pi,
ALI'
17
x Ar
CITT uF PETALU
r—
F%
11 EIN LISH STr\&.,&.T"
ff a
J"L
/A
P` E T Pk L U M 4 5
0 0
1%
iff•
IL
2 1 �0j
N
I
City of Petaluma
....... . . ..... .... ... . .......
DeCristo Multi -Family Project
.... . ... .... .......... . ..
. ...... .. . . .... .. . .....
F " T '
til '-I$ - ffl Fell
of Project Locationo 109 Ellis Street, City -Petaluma
Assessor's Parcel Number 007-361-003
, Sonoma Clounty, Califori
. . . ....... ..
'Pro ertV Ownerse
475 G�wte 5 -Road. Sul"te 222
-2W-t-Ids of DeCristo Familv rius
7356 Country Club Drive
San Diego
CA 92037
(8.1-18.0 units acre); Floodplain
General Plan Designation:Medium Density Residential
A
Description of' proj"edtx
0
!k4 (IR.e s Ident 18 a I
...... . ... .. ...... ...
I he project, proporses ine oerfioiiiion oT aii 6xisiff ig
Xm%
structures found on thle 0.705 -,acre pr *ect s"l'in includinig three
OJ I LlZi, -
dwelling units and associated re,sidential accessory structures,
and the construction of three,, three�story residentiai r)uji inigs
containing 13 multi4amily apartments: including one affordable
level. Twenty-two:
unit th at will be, offeredat the very low income
0 1
off-street vehicular parking spaces ana 24. is,ecureld
in
Ice spaces are Provided on..' e., Landscaping improvements
w.
t.
low
Ap
Awk
Frontage improvements to Ellis Street 'Include a new driveway
. . . . . . . . . . ....... ... . . . . . . . . ..
7 i
Page 2 of 61
P 2:
3
City of Petaluma
Other�
,a pprio
rll**. Jel%
U...0 isto Mult" I
r i--Famfly Pro,jl,�
curb cut, Mp�acement of sidewalks and Signage
O'l Kfi
bicycle faci i ies along Ellis Street. The proJec,t also 'Includes the
1-0 M, ML
trail will be const:ructled
to BASMAA standards, using pervious pavement.
dev lopment
It It, I
as aiiowed by
Chapter 27 of the Implementing Zoning Ordinance and. California I
3itv bonus would allow:
Dertsit,v Bonus Law.: The residentia' densi
W
jj
'tv of 18i.43 units/acrd
onose ,a residential den.si
General Plan Desianation of Medium
ems, on the project site allows a maximum; of 18.0 dwe
Mrrm�M M
oil
east of t
he project site, and singleo-fam!ily, detached housing is
f the creek,
sh Wildlife 'M -A!, WeQ1
artment of Fi and "on
0
ired (e.g. fts,, Water Quality Control Board
p:erm:i
0 di
(RWQCB):# and Sonoma Count,,
I y
e u n
. . ..... ....................... .... . .... ... ...... .....
Page 3 of 61
3
C ity o -f
e ta I u m a,
UeCristo multi -Family Project
.. . . . ....... .. ....... .......
1. SUMMARY ANU INTRODUCTION
■ ■ Rare ff 241 mMM,TMI'IMM MM■■,■■■\■■0.M WON ■■■, none 1'■ ■'1sM1" ■■11■■7■■■■''■ ■1'■■# 1M
■ ■1■ ■■■■11 89'9'014049 1 ■1!.■' MMMMaMr041`B ■■ ■'■■■,■ ■ ■ ■Mf MMM TM MM Ill .assume 111111140411 Owimmim*llagmn ■
5
1
■ ■ s'MM's iMa'M ■■ ■■■'■' ■■s`Mll,s ■■■,■ ■■ cat MMk`■M■1u,i■■u■■■■'s■''
'■M1,'i"■■■'■■'■■■■1Mr■MM1 ■1 ■'/'■ ■■■,
\1■' ■■■1 ■■ ■lM'1MMMM■■ '■■■'�■■�■1'i'65 fem■'l ■ ■'■!■■I■■ ago '■#*
NG
„■ ■, Ills ■■■;' Emissions 1■o■kvI*!N■i■;,■■■.■'■■■'i■'■R■■I■i'1'■I■ ■■ Be "IN 01l IN Ill 04 mum Ila SERVER amass f$MM1w■]F!'■■■■'■■■■*alk*■ 11 40 4.'40■■■■ may
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTI
6
9
2-m2w PROJECT DESCR,IPTION 1'1' MIMo''*MIMIMMMM ■'il■■'11■ ■:1..■r■ ➢M■■I■■I■'Bill 'Blom 'ovum ■'■■■'1■: Holmes ”■■■al'■ IBSEN may ■ 41A'14''0■■:■'■■! ■■ ■■■ ■ AIS■ 1'MF,',Yk■'. ■■ ■'■I■
im 2
2.3r. OUTREACH ■ ■ ■ ■ ■! I■ ■ °■ Simon i' Iw !■ 1' 1 1' ■ ■ ■ ■ *b** IN' ■ a ■ ■ again** House 1 ■ 0 1 s 1 ■ ■ '■ ■ ■: ■ min NMI WINNERS ■ ORKSISMNUNN ■ ■' *REMEMBER
IS
■48 wr—�NTIT,LEMENTS & APPROVALS ■"■■■`'■ ■■■■.1"\ an*** ■ a'1,'s■+1,*means Rings six XV,111,4■ NUMBERS'■1'1\ 1600002 SIR Its ,■' ■m, ■■'■1'i omm i1;■■ WERsm own 1'■''et Mal ■ ■ ■I ■1■ ■
,2
12
1■ DETERMINATION ■ ■-anal ■ Ml1 [Noun MASSmiss ■MMI■Ml l■■'I■' an■■a\IRM'aMlIs1■■■■■■■■t''■■l"Ml 0 l NEW ails area Use ■■!■ MR U, ■■■■■IMI Is #M1r0iM 1M Ml meet ■■ ■■1'O* follow NIS ■■ mil■ WIIMO'
0 13
b2 ITAI
y„
r,EL
f.�.m
..
111 1 OREM=
"' ..
. mean ■
15
4ml AESTHETICS ■ m■1■ mo $m`■■ ■1■ 0 1'■'Rita ■ ■■■■■■'■■M Bureau ■■'■11■■.■■1�"Mira■m■■■m■■'■MM10alMM■■lrMMMT1
0 a
17
4.2
imam ■ ■,■ ■'■Rid:■ AMM■ us ■■■ ■i'■ dpi■ ■■ ovum 1111#"00
In a
4*3m Q1j"ALITY. .*:*:*.,,
?\ an Igo '■..s.,s1M@■■■!■ ■■■\ it a maws Mn■■■4■■■m■■*ON" ■1,■' Mason SIR ■■MM4 M1"posts a ■'■'1''■ an a 101 dM,■ ■ ■■;m■ ■■1 man** 4l Mi'MM1 a miallass1■ 016 s01 KS&■■°\ SESSION 11 4I4'0 MM 0.0
I is II
4
rl BIOLOGICAL RESOU
■■ ■ ■MMM MMArl■ ■,■;'■'■'\■'■ll■MI MI Ai ■■■: ■■ ■ ■'■s Ml.Mlu''1'1'■■'■ ■ \IM Mr MM Mf �, ■1■'1d■■'■■ fMMM 1■�■■■■ '■'■■■■■■''1'MM MMTM'1'■'■'■'■� ■■"■''■ s'1'MM'1, ■■'■■■'■ ■ ■■MM'll'MM.'s'MMMs
.22 a 0
4m5s CULTURAL RESOURCES
28
'■'1aMname 1■Mf■ ■ Sense Due ANN ''■ IBM an* *eggs amuse ■'■■■''■'■■11■■■■\'■ son ■■■iNotes Elm Raiff aim son* Ml''moo SAM am an'■: ■''■'■:l nwivfo!aw laws a a affff's■!M ■Mf*MF1'■■1 ■I■ ■■■, '■
A 29
4m6. ENERGY.. ■■'■■''st1RITZ4*5 amass■ mountng&USE11'■'1 Ml1'MM`■'11■, alms Salomon Ill ■1■ among'■'ll M M!A'■,Mis'Igo : ■■■■■ Importer ■'Oman a Manoranal MM''i, ■ Its ■■II\'HIM min 111 IM4R 1M1,■ ■' Emma am Mf■■'' lrMr■■'■■means a ■ M a ■1'1 MRMp1'1
4m7a MI '1 ''1 ■I■',■'m 1.. 1.■■■"01'1■'M/'.■'■■ ■■■ m■ewell'44Ro■■1mm1'1'■4 til , ■■1■■ ■■°■■■111MMigig'''MI
Gm'0LO1GY AND SOILS■:■■ ME N NOW 1"M'.'**'HE E 62Ii■.■11.0'', ■ 0 IN 11'S' ■.!MM 1■a 0 EN■■ IN ■s111MM ■n ■■■■■■■■■■MIM'+■'■"'s MM M is is ■I■'
30
0 04
■,' ■■■, ■;■'■■■'■'Ml TM''MM'1MM'■ ■■■ ■ ■ �! ■ ■ ■'■'■ ■■1■'''1Ml''1M'' MI MIS■ ■
. r .
33
1 ■ 1'\. 1. ■■■" ■ss ■s■s:1■'1■I■ um's ■IN!oo 1'' mm' ■1 ■' Mlle .-MI'MI■ u11 ■'■'■■lv aM'op
I
5
41.9..
S MA"O["ERIA�'sLS ... MMlsll'1',■'■.■'■■„■ ]me '■"■■Ml,■fMllMlil ■ LM Ill :, MMS■lit ■■■'■■'■': MIMIpMI011m■' m!■ ■■■■ual$ ■Mi■■m'''■11'uu 5 ■,■!;■I■■'■■■■■11 '
'IN
4.,10o 1'■■sM0000■ s' ML\■■■■■'■'m■ls*m111�■1
''' all Ila ■■'■■■'Mlwi,. 1■ ■ 11■1■ ■■ ■ 00 M1 ■ ■■■■■ ■■ ■■■'MIRM141''MM. Mi ■ ■■ ■■ ■ 11 u'1''■IM# 1411!1.■■11.■:'■'■■ug * MM
a '43
4alls
LAND PLANNING MM MM ■ ',1 mass Sam we ■ MI' ■ MM Ronan ONES 1' '■ '1 V 1 ■ ass Monson all almost Ion 1 ■ 10 ■ ■ ■ ■ s. sl' 1 0 no IN ■ on ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ BONN ■ 1 MM MM' MR' Tll'' MM ■ ■ ASSUME 's, ■ '■ '1 loans am ■' ■ ''■ ■ !■` ■ ■ MI \'' MiMM 1 Mt ', ■ II■ ! in 11:5
”
I Ml MINERrAL
1111■''■ ■ smugMIo'IMMr■p \1 ■ its ,NI■,'s1■ass ■■■■■■■■'\■■'me■'\`11'x' IRS USERS ■■011'1MM■ Ill■,■■■'Siff Ill 1's00 Itim Zinn ■■■ ■.'■''.1■0 ■MMlIIM''MJM■'4■■ ran air ■1.1'mass 'iMM *44 Rem Manuel as s1'MI'1'
41411,1A
■ IFSense Nolen ■■■ ■ '■ 1MM Sam■■■■■"■'1MIhIMI'IMM*!*INS a a a ii:gum aMMI''Mr■ ■ sign ■gain ■M1M MM loll a ■ ■'■'■ ■1:'0''1111■1 nos main mammas IllOlympia 1■,■■,■'■■ M1u1MIM11MM'.11'■■■ mossm:6 smas'm MlMfr1MMR 1 ■■■ a Nos ''slow *0ftsmo among Sm an 2
45s A 7
4111
POP''LATION AND, -SIN Mr'■■'■'■!■ KNEES ■ ss�I M412,129■ ■MM ■'"■1Mus.'. ■■ ■'■ ■■■aM■MrM :■'■■■ ■ ll1 �'s■■'■■■ ■■■ "■■!■'■ 11f1'MIMM'' ■ ■'■'■ ■ MM1 Ml MMIC ■■■■■ ■ IM ■'0 Jim '1M1dMM ■Mi■ ■,■
4
4 ■
- 0 ai 48
15
P'U'OBLIC
4
■ ■
V`1 C rt� S on a ■.1'■■■■" MMM' ■ ■'■1 ■1Eugene1 ■ ■ ■■1 argue M1■ ■■'■1■■■ oroi$**ill 1m■ ■■■111 'o'1Mlrl■ m■■■ ■■■MM■ �M MM ■"IM1■ m ■\ 1■ �M■MM�MM1MMi■ ■ ■ 1■ MM+�MM■'M .. ■ 1 ■'■■11' Sears,*
4z 1,6n RECREATION ■' MMI �A Ill 'IM MMM ■ ■' 1 ■' ■; 1 0#12 1 ■ Oman a . MM are 1B. I 1 ■ s 1' 111 0 "\. m' ■ ■' ■ '■G 11 ■: ■ ■ '■ ■ ■ 1 ■ Mr ■ ■' '■: ■ ■ 1: '■' 1 'Reagan * Mr I■ M ■ 1 ■' '■ ■ ■ Mfr Mi 1 1 . ' 1 MM'' ■ ■ 's ■ ' ■' MM MM MM MI - ■ ■ '■ ■ 1 ■ ■ MI' 1f' 1fl MI lM MM ■ ■ ■ i1': ■, ■ ■ ■' ■ M
0501
4*17m TRANPORTATION �?"■■1■'',.■'',■.■ ■ siM■IM ■ ■■' Mlal'1m■,■ ■■ s'MI■'u�M,'101■s■'■.■■11■!■■■'''■1s1:s �'''■'.■■■■ ■■■■■■11MMMM'■'.1■■■■■,'■'■'0 s�111011 ■■■■■■■■■■■ ■' Ml'1''MM ■'IMMI. ■■■ ■''\' l'■1'11 ■■'■' ■■m ■,
53
■ RESO'URCES Mi',*0 wassansamoss'1lMs■Mlm m■1'■■■■11■'10110MISE■■1■■■,■■■■02*0■'■■■mm.■■1■■" i\ 00aSon ■■■■■■ nos 1111i!\'1 ■ ■". Sea '■ ■s Ilia logo 'MM1 s'1ons4.1A was ML■'11 ■■'■
am
A 9
t)4
!■ ■
UTILITIES
4151 10,
■■0011 ■I■.1.■■■'■■■■■ MM011'1 Ml'■\■'!■■■■ 0 Mis1MM ■ ■■■■■'' ■'■1MM .'11M■ s' ■ It No ■ \'■ ■'■'■OMTMIMdMrM ■:■■'MISS ■■s■■' sMi'.IMM MM1.■'■■1■'■■■■','■ ■ are ■'1MI'MM's
WILDFIRE■■ ■ ■.■ ■1 ■ i. ■1 IMlIMMRus ■ ■• ■■■■■IMMoMiMMItom ■ Bull ■■■■■s1■01 YMM',1,s1■''■■!■
5
4,.20. ■'■glq .10,0 \'s' ■■ 0 s!s 0M EOE ■MEN■as41 Mei■■'':u.1■■■■■ 0 11.1''1■ ■'■■1m■■man ■1100*■o.■',■ML■■■7■ ■1 1 11R''1' ■'1''1 ■■ 1 aim
I Cr
58
4w21m
OF
Pub.
SESSIONSes. Code §15065) Oregon 411VANK ■ ■MOMlV1 . ■■"m■■■■lm■■■**:**MMMelanoma1
F I G U R1 E 1 ■
1 10
e R E G
i
1 AL L o C AT 0 N 0 5 a ■ 1 a'■, ■ 0 ■' 0 's in ■1 Is1 0"Ml a No 1MA a 9 IN ■ IN a !■ is' a K 41 a a V a am a 2 a a 112:2 19 In 4■I■■0 a M■0Ill 0MMaMw"1MMMM M[■'■WMiO'IN iMin a a a x■,■■■Ms1 Is: ■■■'!l'su'0''0'v IN 1■
7
8
FIGURIE
2. PROJEC"I" VICINITY
:Ml IMII Il MM' I oil an Mean 0 a IN Flow MM ■
Ml 1 1 a ositummonma 0 IMM 1 ■'' ■ Ml m ■ 2 Mutual MM ■ ■ ■ IN i ® MM a MM MM MM IN W ■ `■ ■ ■ ■ t us .0 US o ' MMM fi MM ■' ■ ■ ■ 1 ■' !M 0:0 ■ ■ � Ml ■ �'
I"IGU*mKIE -"
■ LAND DESIGNI'LUA.1 ION Affam moo „ ■ 1 'Sets to a Maws ■ noun ■ 0 MM MEANS 0 I . MM ''MA ■ m' ■ MM MM :1 llm an Mt 0 s 's lk MMBootiesml ■ amasspursue1p!wwmlmlmma a#, Ms
o 99suit RFIG 'E ■
1'! ■.Ml■'■''' ■ T�11' ' ■ 0 MM1 IMI. ■ IMI' MM# ■a■'■■'■! Ml �MMMMl1■ m■ ■�'. 0'MI MMM ■■1.m0.0■ ��'�& �'Mi�I■I■k' �"�.■■1■>I�rl'.■:ROO X9:44111 SIEMENS: '.OS
S I -1 ill— Pr
F 11 G'U" R E 5: 1 t LAWFIN XV a a alI M1,0 fly ■ miss ■0■0' a Ila wuMM ■'■■ ovum■; ■ Ml OMM NUNN ■■0 is MMMO is 01'
Ill ■ in 19 a a MIM' 0 0' MM mi MM IF a is iF 1 ■ 1 ■ in ■ IN Ill "1M A a MM 0 a IN In 0
in IN m iM S a a 2 6 m 0 9 MM MM a MM MM V m m a IN s lM' 9
5: 1
110
G U I E 6 no SITE ELE"VATIONS.......11 Ml MM' ■ MlOmni 0' MM !■' 1 ■ Mi 1. I• ■ s Ml' E lM 1. MM ■ 11 MMf ■ M Ml MMM IMM X ■ 1 1 MM MM 1'' ■ ■ f ■ lM MI 0 MMM.
! 1 ! ■ 'M■ ■ ■ 0 ■ 0 0 0 Mf MM ■ IA 7 !1' 0 ■ 0 MMM' MM MMM MM MMM MMM MMI' ■ ■ 0
M1g I
is , BIOLOGIkels'PAL COMMUNITIES WI -1-1-11, STUDY AR' A■ My ■ 1 ■ m. 0 1' . lMl Ml 91 U, M Ill IN IN 0 Mi m's :■ ■ p■ Ml M 0 10
Al' ■ ■ It 11121 Ml Ml MM' IMr m m ■ m ■ ■'. Mil MM 23
IN ..
MMMM �
c
AL
„
"
�wage 4 of 61
d
a
City of Petaluma
... ... ....... .
is
I RW]
1 A . PURPOSE AND INTENT
Thi's Env'ironmental Checklist for the 'proposed ami, Multi,
F
DeCrI . sto Multi -Family Project
.
. . . . . . ..... . . ........ . . ....
Family project (hereinafter amu,, to as the
I
nterestled part es a I nd
a
Wit.ial Study is also I nten
approvals, :or vNerrnfts
repare an anEIR'iisprepared,aprojectwillnotthelevelofenvironmentalGu*idelines-,theInitialIr)eforeaproposedtheeffectsor mitigateProjectasrevised*0NegativeDeclarationw
might be required toirnplement the proposed project.
10ing purposes of an Initial Study.,EQA IG Guidelines Section 1506�3(c) I'sts the follow"IlaProvide the Lead Agency with *information to� use as the basis for decNinig whethe:r t
a Negative Declarat"ion.
wasJimLead AqIenc, to modif a rolect, mitigating adverse impacts before
MR -EL it-ro-UNTARB
Q I I iN a 1'
is
aAssmist 'in the preparation of an EIR, 'ifone required.
Facilitate environmental assessment early in the design of a project.
6 1, 0 A I Negative ave
Provide documentation of the factual basis for the finding 'in a Declaration that
a signiticant effect on the environment.
Eliminate unnecessary EIRs.
Determine whether a previously prepared EIR could be used with the project.
The City of Petaluma, as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine
review necessary for the proposed project. Consistent, With Section 'I 5070(b) of the CEQA
I Study 'identified potent'lally &ignificant effects, but:
1) Revisions 'in the Projectplans or proposal made by or agreed to by the applicant
IN
n,egati : ve declaration and initial study are released for public review would avoid
11 A AW
the effects to a point where clearly no significant effect would occur; and
There 'i's no substantial evidence, 'in: light of the whole record before the agency, that the may
have a significant� effect on the environment.
Therefore,, as the lead agency, the City of Petaluma has determined that a Mitigated is
the appropriate level of environmental review.
1.2. PROJECT SUMMARY
Aft
If
AM
'fill FA, 0, R I I L44! I
AM ITT W-11WOMWEWSK-1111FA "10 `I'I'&VWIq='I 3NM!W-A,",WW-W
ARK -2.01.1
Page 5 of 61
uq
City of PetalumA
General Plan*.
0tli(. I
Reflects a commitmenton the par of t :e GityColuncil and
t the Plan;
MUJt&_r
ueGristo 1 Familly Project
A 4
appointed representatives and staff to
accomplished;
• Establishes a basis for judging whether specific development proposals and public projects are in
harmony with Plan policies and standards;
• Allows City departments, other public agenciesand private developers to design projects that will
enhance the character of the community, preserve and enhance critical environmental resources, and
, 2, impacts
minimize and hazards; and
-1 0MAK111211111 I I
redevelopment projects,
Gener,al Plan EIR
---
mprovelment Program (CIP), facilifies and Master Plans
I
ana the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB).
l,
The General Plan EIR was certified by, the City Council on April 7 2008 2010,4082065). The General Plan
101
EIR reviewed all potentially significant environmental impacts and developed measures and policies to mitigate
impacts from buildout of the General Plan. Nonetheless, significant and unavoidable 'impacts were determined
idi to occur.Therefore] the City adopted a statement o overrng considerations, which balances the merits of
approving the project despite the potential environmental impacts. The impactsidentified as significant and
unavoidable in the General Plan! EIR are:
• Increased motor vehicle traffic which Would 'result, in unacceptable level of service (LOS) at six
intersections aW covered in:, 'the Master Plan,.
o McDowell Boulevard North/Corona Road, Lakeville Street/Caulfield 'Lane, Lakeville Street/East D
Street, Petaluma Boulevard South/D Street, Sonoma Mt. Parkway/Ely Boulevard South/East
Washington Street,, and McDowell Boulevard North/Rainier Avenue.
• Traffic related noise at General Plan buildout, which would result in a substantial increase in existing
exterior noise levels that are currently above City standards.
• Cumulative noise from proposed resumption of freight and passenger rail operations and possible
resumption of intra -city trolley service, Which would increase noise impacts,
• Air quality impacts resulting from General ,Plan buildout to population levels that could conflict with the
Bay Area 2005 Ozone Strategy, (This regional air, quality plan has since been replaced by the 2010
Clean Air Pian, which is further discussed in Sections! o.3 Air Quality and 3.7 Greenhouse Gases.)
• A possible cumulatively considerable incremental
from'roGeneral Plan development to ther
significant impact of global climate change,,,
r
Because CEQA discourages "repetitive discussions of the same issues," this environmental document tiers off
the General Plan EIR (SCH NO,. 2004082065) to examine site-specific impacts of the, proposed project, as
described below. A copy of the City of Petaluma's General Plan and EIR are available at the Community
Development Department,I English Street, Petaluma, California 94952, during normal business hours and
online at ht citvofpetaluma.neticdd/plan-general-�lan.html.
2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2.1. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
I
M
City of Petaluma DeCristo Multi -Family Project
............
L IW IW
J M Mt
as the Citx
A rwA a Lei it M NO- 6
Mountain on t
i!111 J_q
An 0 U
SINK r -
irons is showin Figure 11 us Re
n gional Location.
F i
!'iw,,,u,re 'Kegional Locat:ion
Or
Aw.,
40
0 1, M 411RVAN p-, t Wd I Lei
AGWOUNA
City of Pletaluma
An I Tk AMA
L
tra] Peta'luma.
property include multi -family residenti,al to the no: and south
DeCristo Multi -Family Project,
JIM
N t P 2 01 LGIVA It
iaxstin curb cut on the southery ortion oft
ff Owl
e%+
he pro]"eUL Silte's frontage,on Ellis Streets A. gravel driveway
y sidle of the property from the curb; cu
M Mm
w
LIMA
err
w
to
41
AWN
Land USIres, adjacent
ect
to the subj
and McKinley Elementary School to the wes
xm � � n
t t
t F
11
0
City of Petaluma,
....... ... ..... .
DeCristo Multi -Family Project
Igu,re 3: Land Use Designaflon-
JAb
0
apartments with associated landscaping and Changes to existaing
that would include 13 resildentiaII
Teatures at ine site �grassierrana, iT-ees, anio
I
r -
I Am
M hW-i
,, Silte Plan.
AW4 S
Apartment Builainu
Aft
0
T VE. Wi
AT
Page 9 of'61
I Figure 5*. Site Plan
V777wxW
n I
uV
OL
AW4 S
Apartment Builainu
Aft
0
T VE. Wi
AT
Page 9 of'61
I Figure 5*. Site Plan
City of Petaluma,UeCristo Multi -Family Project
E.
r r €
d
_
k
hTIM 0, U, 49,
:
i
"
k
�F
k
€ k
:
n ^
"
m
IMPIMI,
"` k I.ILO-1
igure 6: Stte Elevations
4
»Tra'11
The preliminary planting plan 'includes trees, shrubs,
landscarping will'"be planted along the per,im:eter of t
5
^
e:
"
E
:
-
n -
E,
^
C
^
~
i
:
E �
:
r
ence:is proposed a,long the project's north, s,outh, and easf
property lines.
f'ence
:
Ell, ! is Street frontage of the property.
,
' 4
^
l
, .... ,. .., ... ..." , .. .:: . ... • .:.. , ", , :: ;:. ::. ... I � �� .:. : " : . is : �; : ,.
C 5
• •. . _' :. .�'.. � : r. : _ is e: ,
k
^
E
AL
� r
ate.
:
E
t
t
,
t.
W
11
City of Petaluma
DeCristo Multi -Family Project
The detention barSin would: accommodate rIsIrn
-or—AM,
0
flood waters within
linear feet within the
der
A
ill be accommodated: above the ordinary high water le) -
II
drain, diffuser an I rip rapapron w
SlInte Access and Circlulati[on
be sprovided, 'in enclosed garages located
a
he ground -floor arreas of the residential structures. The remaining
vita
buildlingZ5. Two parKing spaces would contain EV charging stations.
The pedestrian entrance, to the site would be provided at the southeastern corner of the property. A total of 24
wouldinterior psecured bicycle parking spaces are roposed to be located on site. Each of the build'ings
a bicycle storage room with each of the rooms containing eight bicycle parking spaces,,,
Utilities
The project would utiIize public water, and sewer from existing mains in Ellis Street. Potable water would be
installation
P 011&1aa11*accommodated via the ' of new water lines within the project, site that would connect to the existing
water main In Ellis Street. Wastewater would be conveyed from the project site through new sanitary sewer
• pipes, to the, existing sanitary sewer main within Ellis Street, and ultimately to the Ellis Creek water recycling
facility.
Under proposed conditions, the stormwater from the new buildings and other impervious surfaces would be
collected and routed to a.. detention/bio-retention area at the rear of the site, allowing for treatment and
infiltration. The stormwater exiting the basin would be discharged to: the Washington Creek channel.
Site Preparation and Construction
Development of the proposed project is presumed to occur over an approximately 18 -month construction period
,and will initiate with site preparation and grading. Site preparation will *involve demolition of all existing on-site
:
structures and !minimal, grubbing to remove grasses and vegetation,, Sitepreparation also includes the removal
a, six on-site Hawt`horn, and
of ravel surfaces. All trees (three Common Figs, one bald Cypress, one :
one dead tree) are also proposed to be, removed during the site preparation and grubbing stage. There are no,
protected trees onsite,
53
164 cubic yards of soil and the fill of a roximateYGrading activities will resultin the cut ;of approximately
l 11 1& in
cubic yards of sol esulting a net export of 11 cubic yards of soil.
Following completion of grading activities, [Infrastructure improvements and building foundations will be
i i iesbasins will be Installed. As, all public utilitiesconstructed, Ut"It" storm drains and catch currently extend to
the project site, improvements will be limited to the installation of new lateral's and tie-ins to connect to the0
existing sewerservices in place within Ellis Street. Frontage improvements along EIIIIS
power, and gas
Street will be installed, including a new sidewalk, landscaping and signage.
Construction equipment expected to be: utilized includes tractors, backhoes, haul 'trucks graders, Pavers
cranes, water trucks and other heavy-duty construction equipment. Staging of construction equipment and
materials woccur with!*in the footprint of the proect, site and within the right-of-way or Ellis Street (through, the
issuance of an encroachment permit').
Page 11 of 61,
El
City of Petaluma
D e n.s ifty B on u s
DeCristo Multi -Family Project
- - -------------------- - ----------
A n rN
,spaces to zz ONarking spaces,.
F
ment of the Project from 2,5 parkinev
Y
2.4. ENTITLEMENTS &APPROVALS
The following entitlements are requested of the City of
0
Petaluma ;to authoriZe this proposal!.
ll , �z
arlwlll
parking.
'tell
M MGM 1,41 MOq R&
Sonoma County Water Agency- Approval of the Hydrology Study, Stormwater Detention/Bioretention feature,
and discharge Is to Washington Creek.
California Wildlife of Fish and —Lake and streambed alteration agreementin accordance with Fish
o,
and Game Code, Section 1602 for activities within top of bank.
Regional Water Quality Control Board -Water quality certificate in accordance with Section 401 of the Clean
Water Act.
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at
Impact
J10imaaIt I Unless Mitigation is incorporated" as indicated
least one implact that is a "Potentially Significant
&
by the checklist on the following pages.,
12Aesthetics I I 8. GHG E 15s Public Seryices
liat/Forestry
16. 2. Agriculure 96 Hazards
3. Air Quality x 10. Hydrology x 170, Transportation
4. CuIturaI Resourcesnn' 1 Tribal
Use Pla ing 8Biological Resources x 11, Land
5. Cultural Resources, x 12. Mineral Resources 19,1, Utilities /Service Systems
6. Energy X
� J 13. Noise 201* Wildfire �I l
7. Geology /Soils x 14. Population /Housing 2:1 Mandatory Findings
Page 12 of 61
E
City of Petaluma
. .. .. . .........
U(3kCristo-Multi-Family Project
'� a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be repared.
I find that althoull'..
t could have a significant etect on the environment,
A -MA On 04FIEW
', by or agreed to by;: the project proponent. A MITIGATED! NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be
prepared.
I
: find that,tha nro n-qp-r, nrnipd MAY have a significant on the environment,and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ..... ........
I
find that the proposed project, MAY have a potentially significant impact" or "potentially
1
significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment,but at least one effect 1) has, been
sheets, AnIMPACT REPORT
IWALWA
�ile envi,r,o:nme
H IATA ir's =,a a w
I L
Id
13
IMP-
�Gral Uting Plann,er
or e Cl Y of Petarlum'a
M
9
Page 13 of 61
0
W, ID
1-1-11 -11111- �LL ''I
a
r�
i
Ultyp of Petaluma,
''I'Mil Jill III III Jill
DeCristo Multi -Family Project
... ... ....... ... ....
Abb
IF "a a 0
z 'in
4 to
b
... ........ . . . . .... ....... .
a 0
ieterminationis. ma e, an EIR f is re:qu i i I red
-1 IM
14,11lo—MMAIN 61111H 10-1
EMMOAM - I Jim
W
4M
UL I'm 0 0
7') The explanation of each issue should identify:
I
!a) the significance criteria or threshold, -if any, used to evaluate each question, and
any,Lto reb) the mitigation measure ioentilitie if
duc,e the impact to less than significancer
discussion
The following addresses the
potential level of impact relating to each aspect of the environment.
Page 14 of 61
ry
City of Petaluma
4all. AESTHETICS
DeCristo rMwMulti-t-amily Project
. . . ....... .
Potentially Less Than Less than No
SigWit'hant SignificantSignificant
Im
'Would the project. Impact Impact
i ig.ation
M"t"
...... . . . ... ..
. . .. ...... ... ...... ..... ... ... ................... ..... ...... ........ .. . . ..
all
a) Have a substantial adverse effect ona scenic, vista? ❑ Ll U
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including,
but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings,I and
historic buildings within a state scenic highway?,. U U U �
C) In non -urbanized areas,, substantially degrade the
existing visual character or quality of public views of
those
the site and: "Its surroundings?, (Public views are
from publIcly accessiblethat are experience U U �
vantage point). LJ
If the project in an urbanized
-would the project conflict with applicable zoning and
other, regulations governing scenic quality?
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare
which would adversely affect day or nighttime Views
LJ � U
in the area?
Sources,;. City of: Petaluma General Plan 2025 and EIR; City of Petaluma Implementing Zoning Ordinance (VO),
California Scenic Highway Mapping System; and SPAR Submittal —Illustrative Plans, Color Board,and Photometrilc
Plan.
dw
OEM JIM&
MW "Mi
'of tx
the G
urban with'in C1 Y imil"
i
fi
MA
rir
will,
Vt
EX,
A
Aesthetlic,s Impact Analysis..
Paige 15 of 61
. . . . ... .... ........ .. .. .... .. . ...... ...... ... ... . .
.......
Ihw
Cily of Petaluma
Eamon
DeCristo Multil-Family Project
.... .. . ......... . .... ..
at
11
= I
FAN
WE w
[I L Ito-,
ALqw
Aut
Alesithetics MitiYAP-mation Measures: 'None requ
han significant impact related
Lwjwilk 10 LW Wri roy-MVIVIR", K
re
Page 16 of 61
to the obstr�uction of
City of Petaluma ---------
N _3
a, J'a-&
Z_
Would the Project:
...... . . . .. . .. ... ..... ...
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique
Farmland of Statewide Importance
Ue nsito Mulfl-,Family Project
Farmland, or
(Farmland), as
shown on the maps preparea pursuant to the
Mapping Program Farmland and Monitoringof the
,a A"
Calff'Ornia Resources Agency, to non-agricultural
use?
for
b) Conflict With existing zoning agricultural use, or
;
a Williamson Act contract?.
a
Conflictwith ekisting zoning
,-q.-nd i(as defined
All
MOTO, I ]RAM
& A
tor, or cause rezoning
A
in Public Resources.,,
Mrs M11MI
A
section 4526), or
*4 4
ment Code section 51
defli,ned by Gover�,nme
4 j
) Resu
l
It in the I
oss: of forest liand
M
e) Involve other changes 'in tih,eexisting environmen'..1
All M
___r TT(' U're, Guulu 1MTlt
which. due to their locatilon o CIL it
'UAW
R
to non--agriclultural us&�
Ll M
J
L...Jl I I Ll LA
"Farmland of" Local Importance", "Grazing 'Land", and "lot,her land"
-2-,nd there are no 'identified forestlands, within
the City of Petaluma. No agricultural or forestland designations are presen
Agricultural and Forestry Impact Analysis.
r I
ton or near the project site.
: :
a & 1kW IS
2 Effm 11. M win I &AILIOM
�1, imp
ASIA
NA d All
A.gricuitural L Yt.""Iti ation Measurezhi�. None required,
Rage 17 of 61
C 0
'Ity of Petaluma
Where availab ne% he ign icance
I a 4 t1l*
riteria established
y management or air
Q
lied upon to make
ponutilon control aistrict maybe re i Im .,act
0 1
1111111� =1011 I
F I WO -1 Id the oroiect
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation or me
19,141 ble a & 1" if 0
appica . ir quaiity plan'r?,
b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net incre!ase
of any criterila ponuta:nt Tor which the project
f
lrwTti 0wrl MWO, WE Mai VVOW-Ur4im" U-MAIA101 aro-Um MZ ff
W
federall or state ambient air,
It 4 it
DeCristo Multi -Family Project
..... . .... ....
.. .... . .. ..... ....
Less Than L,ess than
ign�ficantSignifi21cant Nva lmp act
with
U quailty standard
missions
in:clucling reieasinr, e
auantitative thresholds for ozo, :e precursors)?
e:ceptors to substantial
F
pollutant iconcen
4 It 9,
Result in otner
N
trations?
0 2
a
(such as those lea,d,in q -g
to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number
of people?
..... . . .. .... . ...... ......
Sources- Citv of Petaluma Genera
t.
I w I r, t I Le- I a I rd- pi I ff Pon I I I U f W, QTq R I I I I i J U, d -
go
Not
EJULITI 119,41M rap
LA 0
...... ,.., ..
W RTITJ I 10 ON Q70111 R MV J L RA! C r4w- 11 7w] K470 -
I HISMIrwIfflif U11 IAFWJ11& % SKHAW4 . s
U1,111117WORURL
OFt __t zWit, t
IMF
1 Adopted by Board of Directors of the BAAQMD in June 201 0 (Resolution No. 201 01-6).
2 In March 2012, the Alameda County Superior iCourt ordered BAAQMD to set aside use of the significance thresholds within the BAAQ,M,D
2010 CEQA Guidelines and cease dissemination until they complete an assessment of the environmental effects of the thresholds in
accordance with CEQA. The Court found that the thresholds, themselves, constitute a "project" for which environmental review is required.
Page 18 of 61
n
City of Petaluma
Duunotue-% Multi-Fami'ly Projeaio-%
J1
Constr�ucti : on Dust,
Not ApplicabLi�
Source: BAAQD's, May 201 7 CEQA Air Quality Guidelines; BMP � Best Management Practices
109particulates with an aerodynamic
Note: ROG reactive o ani:c gases, NOx = nnitrogen"OXIdes, PMIO -course particulate matterar
diameter of 1 0 micrometers {arm) or less, P�V12.519...'", fine particularte matter or particulates with an aerodynamic diameter of 2.5pm or
less,, and SHG = greenhouse gas.
. . ... . .... .. .. .. ..
'h e C ity's G e n e ral
several policies that
son 0
W iEo
q O�h
g h n
ot t t[an ig
e p
4
'taes along streets, 4,,P15 D to reduce emissions
ing construction.
,ur 0
Air Quality Impact Analysis,*
AMR 71
LO
o
do
""16M�N 4 LIM I'm LW6111121
W ra-, W I I
U t j Ell KAM ftiq 111 Ub
rR
Rage, 19 of 61
. .
.. .... ...
City of P e ta I u m a
11
the potential to create a,ir quality impacts.
hT, ME
MILEM
DeCristo Multi -Family Project
is consistent i' " t
,not interter:e witn implementation
he CAPMeasures,,'The proposed project 1would have a less
will
impact Clue .o a lict witn ir e iean
iL W 1CM
r planning efforts sinc�,j
111 R Pat "�a
WE
..........
k am N
han signitica n
ect suppoirts the goals of the CAP
a) the proon
limits: b inc:ludes control measures
the proposed project would generate air quality emissions we
plan and impacts,
4.3 (b) (Violate Air Quality Emission Standard) Less Than Significant Impacts: Air quality emissions
associated with the proposed project would result, from short-term construction activities and ongoing operation.
BAAQMD screening criteria" provide a conservative estimate above which a project would be considered to
have a potentially significant impact to air quality, Projects that are below the screening criteria levels are
M 5 If impacts
Ireasoniab y expected to result 'in less than signifIicant to air quality since pollutant emissions would be
minimal. When projects fall below the screening criteria levels, a quantitative analysis of the project's air quality
emissions is not required.
The screening level criteria for multi -family residential development, is shown in Table 2 below.
. . ..... .... ... ....................................... ..... . .... .
!Table 2:. Air Quality Screening
...... ...... .......... ...
Land Use, Type Operational Screening Size Construction Screening
Size
.. ... . . .. . .. . ............................. . .. . . . .. . ....
Apartment,4.0 du LROG)
Rise 451 78 du "GH" 2. . ... ... .... .... ... .. ...
Source,: Table 3-1, page 3-2 BAAQMD 2017 CEQA Guidelines, May 2017. du- dwelling Unit; ksf= thousand square feet
. .. .... ... ... . ... . .... . ... . .......
Table 2 shows the screening size for construction and operation of low-rise apartments. Theprojectproposes
the development of 13 multi -family
units, which is well below the screening size for construction (24,0 dwelling
units) and operation (451 dwelling units for criteria pollutants and 78 dwelling units for GHs).G'Given that the
it a IN
proposedproject size is well bellow the screening criteria, the project does, not trigger the need for a quantitative
if ti
quality analysis. It can be conclusively that the, proposed project would have lessthan signi icanair
impacts due to degraded air
3.3 (c) (impact Sensitive Receptors)Less Than Significant Impacts with Mitigation: The BAAQMD defines
sensitive receptors as "facilities or land uses that 'include members of the population that are particularly
sensitive to the effects of air pollutants, such as children, the elderly and people With illnesses.° Examples of'
sensitive receptors include places where people live, play or convalesce and include schools, day care centers,
hospitals, residential areas and recreation facilities.
The project Site is located in close proximity to existing sensitive receptors 'Including adjacent multi. -family
Elementary School to the south, located at 110 Ellis
residential uses to the east, and west, and the McKinley
11 1 Nam
Street. Residential uses and schools are sensitive receptors because people (children and elderly) are often at
home,/school for extended periods of time,.
During construction, onsite activities will result in the emission of exhaust from vehicles and heavy-duty
equipment as well as the generationdoall* of fugitive dust from grading and ground disturbing! activities. To ensure
I'd 9 a below that ugitive dust, emissions are, reduced to leves significance, Itigation Measure AQ -1 shall be,
implemented.
AQ-1 incorporates
BAAQMD Basic Control Strategies and requires covering haul trucks,,, watering
during active ground disturbance, limiting idling time, pro er maintenance of equipment, and other standard
measures.
The nearest, sensitive residential land uses would be located approximately 10 feet from construction activities.
o sensitive r,ece 0rsactivities,
Given the proximityto construction which, will include the use of heavy-duty
construction, equipment, emission levels maybe occasionally elevated. As such, Mitigation Measure AQ -2, as
. . .................... . . . . . .. ....... ............. . .
Page 20 of 61 _ _ -
City of Petaluma
set forth below
i;hall be impl
which
a "
DeCristo Mult"i-Family Projecl
requ,ires enhanced constructio�n mitilgation measures
MIN IS.
4t3 (d) (Other Emissions or Odor) Less Than Significant Impact: There may occasionally be localized odors
.9IN
during site development associated with construction equipment,paving and the application of architectural
coatings. Any odors generated during construction would be temporary and not likely to be noticeable beyond
Its the immeaite construction zone. As a residential development, operation of the project will not create
a IS l
objectionab�e odors affecting a substantial number of people., Therefore, the project will have less ';than
a impacts IFsoasignificant to air quality due to objectionable odors.
Asir Quality Mitigation Measures.
iL
AQ -1: Latest BAAQMD recommended Best ManagementI Practices IMPS) to control for fugitive dust and
exhaust during all cactivities shall be 'incorporated into all demolition and construction plans
�
to require implementation of the following:
in All exposed surfaces (e.g., parking areas, staging areas, soil pales, graded areas) and unpaved access
roads) shall be watered two times per day.
2. All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material shall be covered.
3.1 All visible mud or dirt track -out, onto adjacent public, roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum
street sweepers at least once per day, The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited.
4. All vehicle speeds, on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 mph.
50 All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed al's, soon as Possible. Building
pads shall be laid as soon: as possible after, grading unless seeding or soil binders are used.,
6. Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the
idling
amaximum time to 5 minutes (as required by the California airborne toxics control measure Title 13,
'!
Section 24,85 of California Coder of Regulations [CCR]).Clear Signage shall be provided for construction
workers at all access points.
tuned
i'7. All construction eqiupment shall be maintained and properly accordance with manufacturer's
"catequipmentshall andspecKi ions. All be checked. by a, certified to be running in
Al
I
proper working condition prior to operation.
8. Post a publicly visible sign with the -telephone number and person to contact at the Lead Agency
IN
regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours. Ther
Air aa District's phone number,� shall also be Visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations,,,
AQ -2: a 4
The Applicant and contractors) shall implement additional construction, mitigation measures
recommended by BAAQMD, when activities occur within 100 feet of nearby, sensitive receptors,,
including the following.
1. Activities, shall be phased to reduce the amount of disturbed surfaces at any one time. The simultaneous
IS I a a 0 a a * the
occurrence of excavation,, grading, and griound,-disturUing construction activities: on same area at
any one time should be avoided.
r i
2. Idling time Of diesel -lowered constructionequipment shall be limited to two minutes.
3. All construction equipment, diesel trucks, and generators shall be equipped with Best Available Control
Technology for emission reductions, of NOx and PM.
4., Require all contractors to use equipment that meets California Air Resource Board's (GARB) most
I
recent certification standard for off-road heavy. -duty diesel engines.
Page 21: of 61
YM,
City of Petaluma
4
Wouild the kl�,Nroject:
1i
ProjectUeCristo Multi-Farni'ly
Potentially Less'Than
Significant Significant
lmn:l%
with
Mitigation.
Less than No Impact
Significani
Impact
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or
it
through 'habitat modifications, on any species identified
as a candidate, sensitive,,, or special status species in
1.1 � U ❑
local or' regional, plans, policies, or regulations, or by the
ICalifornia Department of Fish and Wildlife(Formerly Fish
and Game) or U.S.. Fish and Wildlife Service?
b Have a substantial adverse: effect on any riparian habitat
Jor�! other sensitive natural community icientified in local or by u
regional plans, policies, regulations or
I
Department of Fish and Wildlife (formerly Fish and
Game) or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?.
c) c) Have a substantial adverse effect on, state or federally
protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, ❑ � ❑
vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling,
hydrological interruption, or other means?
d interfere substantially with the movement of any, native
resident or migratory fish or: wildlife species, or, with � . I � ] ❑
established native, resident or migratory wildlife corridors,
impede
1 0 nursery sites?
or the use of native wildlife
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting
U
� —,
biological resources such as a, tree preservation policy
or, ordinance?
f;of ') Conflict with, the provisions an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation u �
F-1 u
Plan,, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat,
conservation plan?
Sources: City of Petaluma General, :Plan 20,25 and EIR; City of Petaluma Implementing Zoning Ordinance (IZO); Tree
Preservation, Plan for 109 Ellis Street, prepared by Sherby Sanborn Consulting Arborist, November 116 2018" and
Biological Resources Assessment, prepared by WRA Environmental Consultants, December 2018.
Biological Resources Setting: Biological resources are protected by statute including: the Federal
Endangered Species Act (FESA), the California Endangered Species Act (CESA), and the Clean Water Act,
ionmigratory i(CWA). The Migratory Bird Treaty Act:(MBTA) affords protecti to bird species including birds of
prey. These regulations provide the legal protection for plant and animal species of concern and their habitat,.
As reported in the 2,025 Genera] Plan EIR several plant and animal species with special -status have been
of Petaluma. The City
recorded or are suspected to occur within the! Urban Growth Boundary of the City
contains species identified in, the California Natural, Diversity Database (CNDDB) due to rarity and threats and
are considered sensitive resources.
"Aa
Page 22 of 61
City of Petaluma
r-%
UeCristo Multi -Family Proileict
Swo
t E t � :�
o�
0
F:igu,re 7p. Biological! Communities within Study Are,
42
I
.The
The
, solft chess, Bermuda grass,
- for
ture
agriculand has
City of Petaluma
....... ......
Ueuristo Multi-Farnily Project
N Wd qI MI
�W&Uwt :440
bankincluded non�na,t,ive grasslan
Reaional Water Qualitv Con
Control Act, and t
A 2
IL
Army Cor s of Eng'ineers, ('Corps)
.under 404 of
WA
-the Clean Water Act (C
RWQC 1) Under 401 of the-C'WA and the Porter
I
IF
,ie Californian Department of FI*sl,: an
Fish and
.... code.
Cologne Water, Qualit-
0
under Secti on 1602 ofthe Californ*ia
Special -Status Species
As detailed in the Biological Resource Assessment, several special -status species have, moderate occurrence
i lite species ranges, habitat
potential or were present wit'nin the study area. Detaiis on triese wildgo and '
preferences,: and occurrence potential are provide in the Biological Resources Assessment, see Appendix B.
The following 'identifies special status species wmoderate potential to occur or were: observed :(present) in
the study area. The protected status for each species is also provided below,.'
• Fringed myotis (Myotis thysanodes).WBWG P Priority. oderate Potential.
,
Long-legged myons (Myons volans). WBWG High Priority. Moderate Potential,.
• Pallid That (Anirozous pallidus) CDFW Species of Special Concern, WBWG High Priority. Moderate
Potential.
• Townsend's big -eared bat (Corynorhinus townsendii) CDFW Species of Special Concern. WBWG High
Priority. ',Moderate Potential.
• Nuttall's woodpecker (Picoides nuttallii) USFWS Bird of Conservation Concern, Present.
• Oak titmouse (USFWS Bird ofConservation Concern.:Present,.
• Western pond turtle (Actinemys marmorata) CDFW Species, of Special Concern, Moderate Potential.
• ESU (Orcorhynchus tshawytscha) NMFS Species of
Chinook Salmon —Central Valley Fall/late fall -run
Concern. CDFW Species of Special Concern. Moderate Potential,,,,:
r r
•
Steelliead —Central California Coast DPS (Orcorhynchus mykiss irideus) Federal 'Threatened. Moderate
Potential.
• Sacramento Splittail (Pogonichthys macrolepidotus) CDFW Species of Special Concern. Moderate
Potential,.
The first four special status species, listed above are species of bats. Bat species have moderate, potential to
occur within existing onsite structures (buildings) and trees 'Including those onsite and in the immediate vicinity
along the riparian corridor of Washington Creek., The bird species (woodpecker and titmouse) typically
inhabitant riparian areas and may occur along Washington Creek and onsite trees. The final four special status
species listed above are associated with aquatic habitat and may occur within Washington Creek and in the
A
case of the pond turtle basking along creek banks,
Biological Resources Im pact Analysis:
14.4 :(a) (Speciai'StatuMs Secies Less Than SignITIcant with Mitigation: As described above, the project site
Page 24 of 61
NSIM
R
DeCristo Multi -Family Project
. . . . ........... ............. .....
=Llwr�mm� �MJL 4NEEL,-.Ak-
J" A,
state or Tederally listed as endangere,,
Ww�',
Mimi
El
a tell, Kel a
US
dp
AM
'M 4W W
do
Aft
al I
peclle,s wni be avoided and
C I
it,y:of Petaluma DeCristo Multi -Family Project
. .... .. .. . . ........... . . .. . .. . ..
. . . . .. .... ... . ..............................
4.m �11
re
jurisdictional waters, Mitigation
A It 2 on J
ra jr, 1, lw� , I
9
11 Iq
---- -- lermel te wnicn reciuires, ins,,,:
m
ti6as*ri, a t* ii
practices, umaing cons:u-'iction acu-�Tr"illi,es to m5 it
VAN
0 '7 V1911MINN, LwAim�.,-
h ulml
MRS
NMI, k
AV
vi� ,
9: 3 KO � N4496
0 w OF EMIL,
sit A m
NOW V
AREA M =41 m
IMULUROL
Page 2,6 of 61
0
Gity of Petaluma
DeCristo Multi -Family Project
qF1
MA HIWOWIIEI��ffl
I IN
;wrveys, no impacts wlill occur to bi
*s and 'work will oroaress without restriction. If active nests, are
I
M -
u , iestAng
MOM
uai tied t) olio,
"he nest 'is
sha' Il'be
allowed to move ut. of ther area under its own power.
11 q A
V v
Av.
h,
ILM11MR& -§W�K
AL
MEMEL12%
IR L 1WRLM4m V io In LW
14bW-bi1W1KU4V-1 I'm W16MILWA M L 11L -�Mpil -At 10 M I &M -A 0 M M 1xW.AWkWA 10 Lw MWATIKO"Ita'" M
ILIMETUNJEWO All"T IL
BIO -5:1 'To avoid, minimize and offset potential impact to waters of the united states and waters of the state
(Washington Creek', the following shall be implemented:
1. Install and maintain soil erosion/sedimentation best management practices (BMP) prior to and during
.1
construction and following construction apply permanent BMPs for soil and erosion control such as
seeding with a native erosion control seed mix).
2. Trenching and ancillary activities associated with the detention basin pipe installation shall occur duri
ng
a
the dry season between July 15 and October 1. Trenches shall be back filled to match originalland
contours.
31 A dissipation apron shall be incorporated into the construction plans of the detention basin and shall be
located below the 6 -inch pipe outflow to minimize erosion of the stream bank. If the apron extends
below the OWM'�HfromCr of Washington Creek, then a,404 permit the Army orps of Engineers shall be
obtained,.:
4. Compensatory mitigation for temporary and permanent impacts to the Washington Creek bank, if
determinednecessary by regulatory agencies (CDFW and RWQCB) during permit application process,
requirements.may be required at a ratio 0,11 1A or as otherwise directed by it: :e 1permiit If compensatory
mitigation is required, then the applicant shall purchase mitigation credits at a suitable mitigation bank
in accordance with permit requirements.
Page 27 of 61
City of Petaluma
DeCristo
Multi-Family Project
.....
.............
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitilgation
iii
b Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of Li
an, archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5?
c) Disturb any human remains, including those *Interred U � � �
outside of formal cemeteries?
. ... . ................ . . ....." . . . ........ . ....
Sources: City of Petaluma General Plan 2025 and EIR; and Historic Resource Evaluation, prepared by City of Petaluma,
May 1, 201811
unique
Cultural Resources Setting: Petaluma,, and: cultural resources contribute 'to the city's
characterh areas, contain resources tat date to and identifiable sense of place. Thecit, the
inhabitation
of the Coastal Miwok Tribe and a number of resources that visibly chronicle the evolution of the city
from early settlement through present day. Such resources include r buildings, structures, landscapes, sites, and
objects. The history of Petaluma is present in the contemporary landscape and the unique character that arises
from the side by side existence of new and old. Petaluma's historical resources are preserved and encouraged
throughpolicies and phistoric that serve to maintain the character,,
ad a 0
Cultural Resources m aCt Ana losis
Y
Af Ali
MW
one] AR itt-H.W405-10
t.
EI 0 W L-W—P WOW W ML-qw-A,
Page 28 of 61
El
ulty of a,luma,,
Y
QeCristo Multi -Family Project
....................
;,ultural Resources Mitigation fiversures:
RISE
IIL
-tell
T rKOCIMOUNHI uoi�saoa OFANLm"s 1111i
(111IROM]WIPORIAL
_W1 '91 M
si i A I aracte
m 11
s
ate. and
i
t'ne reduction o
in Section
nerqy cons,urn, tion in buflaings by means of approprfatA
h
AOM%
tiustainable Building and C a ter, 5. Mobility. Resildentia
9 A 0
energiy efficiency is addressed in Chapter I I Housing Element.
W1 ip
EIJW2
ff YON
IV Aw
Fail,
4W
tv
1-1Z a
=77 riergy:Mftigation ss None requiried,
A,7* GEOLOGY AND SOILS..
M.
�k
City of Petaluma DeCristo Multi -Family Project,
iv. Landslides? LJ
01
,b) "Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ILJ
C) Be located on a geologic unit or soil, that is unstable, or that
would become unstable as a result of the ,project, and r ------- I
potentially result in on or off-site landslide, lateral i..J❑ L
r
spreading, subsidence, or
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in 'Table 18-1-B
of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial � U U
u
risks to life or property.?
I a of
where sewers ,are not available for the disposal of waste
water?
f) Directly or, Indirectly destroy a un ; ique paleontological
resource or site or r uni e -qeo:lo feature?
him
lk", It
OF
low -
AM I H
I RWO U1
•
rr
rig
Geology and So'lls Impact Discussion.
Page, 31 of 61
... . . . .....................
/ON a
N.Aty of Petaluma
he Mercialli Intensity Shaking Severity levell.
IX, "'Violent" on t
7
'As � 11- NOM Mo4it =,M- ig
In loos!e a[luvium an:d- poo
I MA%
AT
� I �
I . — — i I MM
k k
Rodgers Creek Fault Zone placles it withi'n Zonq
dy com; iacted fill. Both the priMary and
:p
i
secondary effects being ground failures
W 'I M M, I I "A
r iStil 1�% CN 1 1,2 1
l Uoof
0 r� a I
DeCristio Mulfi-�-amny Proj'eCt
:e """Oenera ing taWt, istance
The Intensity OT earthLivake mofi.on will detend on the charact4 Y
K KA
A
p
jb� 46
MAW 111
... .............. . . ...... ........
_Mw'' mw�
L IW
-M&W—PA-w-j", 0 SLIW-A MLIWA MOWAA
JIM44111r,4411 U
A& JIM�Wf
IM
IL
re MI 9, M 6110M ON
Page 32 of 61
Cit
Y u -,--,f Fetal: UM
nct
DeCristo Multi -Family rP`roj*C
A
o pre -watering prior to the placement of foundations, -
non -:expansive t n, ano/or tne
MM OR
reducea to1evels below siynlTlcance.
remloval of
111: z ers. Wi t h
system that
HIM.
A Fs
dis: al s 1 ms ro---osed as ofthe pro
e
F. Therefore there will
pos Y P a rt I
of soills to support septic tanks orother wastewater disposal system.
...... . - - - --------- -
00
Less Than
Potent"I'ally, 0% a a Less than
bigni, icant
S *1 gn ilf i"cant NO% S *1, g n i f J'c a, n t
Impact WI -11 Impact
Mitigation
... .... ........ . .....
be no wimpiact resulting from ;he adequacy
ME
M RAI,! IL
F.
or
GEO-2: As determined by the City and/or, Chief Building
Official, all applicable recommendations set
forth in the in Soils Investigation Report (Reese &Associates) prepared for the subject property,
including, but not limited to grading, excavation, foundations systems, and compaction specifications:
shall be incorporated,. Final grading plan, construction plans,and buildingshalI demonstrate thatplans
:
recommendations set forth 'in the geotechnical reports have been incorporated into the design of the
project.:
Nothing in this mitigation measure shall preclude the City Engineer and/or Chief Building Official from
requiring information to determine compliance with applicable standards. The geotechnical
engineer shall inspect the construction work and shall certify to the City, prior to issuance of a
in
certificate of' occupancy, that the improvements have been constructed with the
geotechnical specifications.
4v8* GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
Would the project:
. . ........ .
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either
directly or indirectly, that may'ha, ve a si nilT"ic i an t
ienvironment?
mpact on the
. ....... ... ... .
Page 33 lof 61
hydrofluorocarbon,s and perfluorocarbons,.,
GHGs trap heat "in the atmosphere, which heat':
V,
I warming and is Contributing to climate changel.
4 It A
impalct'Sincluding sea level rise increased risk. ol
-M
rz re wMe
Mill
IMF T"x
...... .....
dia
AL 7W
dF
raw -
1, Lei, 1 NO -111 MOH OUSIN
1� A
RUM
t
LIZ Lim
Page 34 of 61
10
go -fir
low
DeCristo Multi -Family Project
. . . ... . .. ......... ..
f
0
1 4
erniss I ions would be reduced to 3:7611620 MTICO
;to the 1,990 per
ta
capiemission levels.
2e. This represents a 31 % reduction ol'::
.;�.Ppl'ication of re,duction me�asures
El
Greenhouse Gas, [m, pact Ana YSIS
W
SS ( Sig a) (E ini icianrl "n%J Emil'ssiOn& L:e than n 'if I"
mi : nimal. When projects fall bellow the, screening criferia, I
# W I A X A
in
emissio! s is not requir&I
if IS
cant, impact,: Greenhouse gas emissions associated
evels, a quant! ive analysis ofthe project's air quality
Lai WAid 51, 1 LEI
rl
0000. 0000 `
-64
Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Mleasures: None requiredis
ar) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through the routine transport, use, or
disposal
omaterials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through reasonably foreseeable
involving upset and accident conditions the
release of hazardous materials into the
environment?
hazardious emissions or handle hazardous
...........
..................... ... . . . .
Rage 35 of 61
E
0
'Uty-t of" Petaluma
J --I------- �
or acutely hazardous materials, substances,, or
waSILKe within oneowffiquarter of an existing or
proposed school?
Vi
DeCristo Multi -Family Project
. ... ......
Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a ❑ J u �
result, would create a significant hazard to the
#L
public or the environment?
e) For a project located within an airport land use
plan or,, where such a plan has not been adopted,
within two miles of a public airport of public use
airport, would the project result in a safety hazard ❑ J J
or excessive noise for people residing or: working
in the project area?
f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere
with an adopted emergency 'response plan or
El
emergency evacuation plan.?
Expose
g) people or structures, either directly or
indirectly, to a significant risk of toss, injury or
death involving wildland fires.
r do"e �
40
-1 M NMIU -1 r -
W 82
IM ]JEW W M
Amu
Page 36 of 61
a
City of Petaluma
uuUnS%to Multi -Family Project
V111
11
TLONF211LO
J-0 W MURMUR W a a In &ATU&JOUN1111 �$� XIUPWMMO�41 fliq��MMIUI& -14
Strielet were constr
school were developed
!I I
IT41 W 61111 -1 -
lip.
LWI
M MVIJ�
IBM—
the areas of vehide parking. I I
i
The primary hazardous Materials considerations related to the include proper disposal and removal of1
demolition debris during construction.
Hazards/Hazardous Materials Impact Analysis:
iE.
W MW
AP 0 Fro, 1
I LTAI il
do
MkZ� -Ak�.ML�JL—AL�-M
Amp
AMM
Page 3,7 of 61
. ..........
lip
lily i I
i i roj e
DeCristol mulifl-Fami ip Ct
. ..........
I
more buried septic tanks., As described in the Phase
�e'mlov r al or abandonm&nt Mi [plabon MearSure HAZM$2 is,
FM
% -j corliLdIIIS
r-z>A there is no: evidence that the SIV,
n order to ensure that groundwater is protect dunng
All
AM L�40
accordance with Sonoma County
14
I MALIN
Ip
40
1W
OW
IMLL
Aa ARM0101111110—ro
d 0 16! 0. Le- IM LN, t, QMO t 4, 1 7*M LVM� 1, LA 0, 01 LOW I I I EX
OEM
I a," 11 L MI W
RRAA
An
MI NO
Wow
W A—W
M, W
DO!
ITO W, jo
Page 38 of 61
1, 'v
cl
City of Petaluma
... . .. ... ......
a M 8
appiicat on,
it a
tnerein shall
a
be i I niented,
ARM M I
RUM&OMMUS] ill
Would the project:
a Violate anywater, quality standards o
requirements or otherwise substantially degrad
surface or ground water quallity?
b,) Substantially, decrease groundwater supplies, o
I ith groundwater recharge suc:,
interfere substanfial'y wi
M %I le rNrol ndwa,j!7i
S
t at the project ay i,mpeup ustaihat) t j u
management of'the basin
DeCristo Multi -Family Project
.. . ........ ... ....... . .........
y aoandonea or
is At "40-
Substantially alte r r the existing drainage pattern on the
.0
sJte,_._�area. includh,rouah the alteration, of the
throu i i o.n
t a stream or river lo e add"t' of
it a
impervious, surfaces
in a manner which would,.
�I
i. I
result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or oft-
site;
U ❑ �
HIM Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface
runoff in a, manner which would result in flooding � n � ❑
on- or offsite;
iii. create or contribute -runoff water which would
exceed the capacity of existing or planned
stormwater drainage systems or provide
U � ❑
substantial addisources, ofpolluted runoff; or
iv. impede or redirect flood flows? u � � u
City of Petaluma
DeCristo Multi -Family Project
lity is regulated by the North Coa
Basin Plan A, T h e RVI (36
ssuance of a, Clean Water Ceftitication when d velopmen
ti
RWQC,B via trhe
f'O r imp I em e n tin g!-
V
W W
4W
An All
WE WR
MPAI "Sh M
OR.
�,ity of'Petaluma
W
Ofta
chance ofbe'n�i
[Tom "M
L
r—% 0�1% r-1% J
Uk:;k...rlzs--to Multi-Farn'lly Project
RIM kifflous
MEW
vo,�ume wasraral' I aiM
A 14 1 NO- 1,
-K WN
Hydrology and Watler Quality Impact Analys:"[,,-WI*.
9A,
Its MA,
210
AM
AMR.
An,
AD
di
-19, Lqw-WNEA
0 n 7 -Man
Page 41 of 61
City, of Petaluma
. ........ .... .
so see discuss* er 4.1 low
a �', M c1r: ion above und
easures and usinig
0
De,Cristo Mulfil:-Family Prolect.
pipe to Washin�gton Creek.
1. IFMII ILA&
of the, existing storm drain; system.:
V411140111 IS] M I Le -Al
-------------
"'AL
0 WA & Ww,
to, I Owl, a N " VA RMA ro I I
W, �WA M M M WWW
M M
'Ado Ab
w W
PM
l PS M wo
ow
Page 4,2 of 61
of Petaluma
MISS 11
I few Ito �'4.11
MR i mum. -I *4161
IN
IN MM
DeCristo Muiti-Family Project
Comb # g
D'stri 'and prior to occupancy, L
M op,
t
certiT,i cation or ve,rifi cation snall be provided
I to I " dm"n It ste
appropriateby tne Floodp ain A i i re*
lo All newi m prove m ents, shall
2z All new wimiprovements shall
a
H
Such
to the F o,od Administrator,. As determined to: be
the following standards may, a1so be requlred:#
be anchored to present flotation, collapse
or lateral movement,
NMI I
damage and using methods and: practices to minimize flood damage.
All electrical, heating, air
tion
conanionin ventilaand
,MEL AN& IM
less than one square �incn to:r every square ooi o. enciosea area sna
S,
'Would the project:
t resistant to flood
I
Physi,caiiy divi'de an established commu,nity?
dos 4
Cause a significant environmental impact, dlue to a co'nact
2111 a
wim any and: use p. an, po icy, or riegulation ado,ated for
Or nt.al
the purpose f avoiding or mitigating an environme
effect?
0
11 be provided.,
J U QSl ❑
dM MWO W
4M
Land Use IArn&o*&act Ana ysist.
P
JORMWE
JMML -A
... ........
.. .. .......
Page 43 of 61
Ulty of re-ttaluma,
2#1
'rut 40
Petalurn,a,, T le Dror)osied �i
I
DeCristo Multi -Family Project
U
proposed Density Bon!
established by the City c
:n
i
threemstorybuildi, gs are consistent wi
Rr5 Zone Development Standards,
t e General Plan DesL'--Iff SO
4,welling units/alcre. In accorda-nice with, t! 120 Section
development incentive/concessilon has been requested to r
iling of the threve. new buildings and the elevation of the
he R4 development standards set forth 'in the IZ,O, Table 4.91M R4 anq
DUN Kai
27.090 and California Density 'Bonus Law one
9 0
uce the parking requ I irement set forth in the IZO
L-,
WrISMOF
t400t-,wide
tart of' the
impacts.
f approval,
Fill'. IMMPW
ff Nr-�
I Ak 41W
0 all a
ILI
M W
Would the project' Mitigation , %WE impact
Impact I,
Incorporated
a) Result in the loss, of availability of a known
Mineral resource that would be of value to the
"he residents of thestate?
region and t
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-
important
mineral resource recovery site
delineated on a local general plan, specific plan � I ❑ �I �
or other: land use, plan?
Sources: 2025 General Plan and: EIR.
. ..................
Mineral 'Resources; Impact Discussion
4.12 (Mineral Resources or Resource Plans,,) No Impact: There are no known mineral resources within
.... .... . .
Page 44 of 61
City of Petaluma
. ....... ...
the UGB. The project site has not been delineated as a
0
expected, that the project will res:ul,t in the loss !of availab
tl,esignated as "locallyimportant Therefore.,
avaiiability of mineral resources.
to"%
utz;urlsto MultF-FamilyProject
locally important resolurcef recovery site. It is not
IRlaw, r projec, 1 have no impact triat resuits, in tv e loss, 0
M*ineral Resources Mifiglaflon Mearsures: None required.
Would the project result in:
VAU
nicrease :in ambient
A
croiect min excess of-'
genera,l pia
standards of
no:ise levels in the vicinity of the,
is
,yam established in the local
noise ordinance, or applicable
*ther agencies ?.
I :a
Ll iLi
j I
b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or
groundborne noise levels? � U � U
c): For a project located within the vi'c'inity of a private
airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a, plan
has not been adopted, within two miles of a public
airport or public, use airport, wthe project expose LI ❑ � ❑
people residing or working in the project area to
A,
excessive, noise levels?
. . ........ . . . . ... ..... .. ... .... ..
Sources: 2025 General Plan and EIR; IZO 21.0410; and Environmental Noise Assessment prepared by Illingworth
&
Rodkin, December 11, 21018W
. .. .... . .. . . .. ......
Noise Setting: Noise is generally defined as unwanted sound. It is characterized by various parameters that,
include
.0 the rate of oscillation ofI sound waves (frequency), the speed of propagation,, and the pressure level or
energy content (amplitude). The sound pressure level is the most common descriptor used to characterize the
loudness ofan ambient ('existing) sound levela Tnedecibel (dB)l scalei's used to quantify sound intensity, given
that the human ear is not equally sensitive to all frequencies in the entire spectrum, noise measurements, are
asensitive
"A-weighting,it",written
weighted more heavilyfor frequenc'es to which humans, are in arprocess called
as "dBA"and referred to as "A -weighted decibels°. In general, human sound perception is such that a change
in sound level of 1 dB cannot typically be perceived by the human,, ear, a change of 3 dB is just noticeable,, a
1 1
change of 5 dB is clearly noticeat)ie, and a change of 10 dB 'is perceived asdoubl'ing thesoundlevell
The Citgy of Petaluma regulates the noise environment " through Section 21.040 of the Implementing Zoning
Ordinance (IZO). The IZO stipulates an hourly average level of 60 dBA as the maximum that may be generated
on one land use that may affect another land use; the allowable levels are adjusted to ,account for the ambient
noise levels and in no case, shall the maximum allowed noise level exceed 75 dBA after adjustments are, made.
lit
Mr's
DFUL4 VA ILWER11
0 UNU Mi7
. . . . .... ........ . .. ..... ....
Page 45 of 61
City of Petaluma
a
F F
is characterized primarily by roadway
Elementary School.
1
DeCristo Multi, -Family Project
. . ............ ...... . . .. . . . .. . ........
MA,
f the
0 18. IN
of nc
fity st4l
t to
e p r o
ate 9
om ne-
Mill
Pag
a I grim, ITL
MAILM
m 'toring study on November 29th and 30:1h, 1,
Oni
oise measurements werecollected using a Larsoin Davis
i pre -polarized conde�nser
at the northeastern, and
the eastern property li,ne in
M
Noiasie Impact Analysis.
a
ange from a CN:Eq
NZ
IMIL,
WAWWWAL
AM
MI &VU11"
MI NOWA MI
M W
M LM d 11 -00-- WILM
WINVIN FURMU PC I
a ITA t Eel a t U41 I
Oft
MA
Min
"ANA
AL
TAITA I
RJARtlo T
W &T. A, I A rd'o, U LOA] 1 4 L A H LZRNM
� 117 Me
AL TMI�
MO M-
e 46 of 61
City of Petaluma
2. Delivery
to the same construct -Ion hours specl-"..im IM
T materials, and equipment to the site and
tr
Hal
SHill to
Ing,
coindition and appropriate for the equIPME1.n.t.
Unnecessary id ling Oternal combustion engines z3h
11 be strictly Prohibited.
from the site is restricted
WAWM M
barriers.
7. Utilize "quiet' air
0 a
8, Construction staging areas sha
11 be established at locations that will create the o-vrealtest !distance
Y
9., Locate material stockpiles:, as well as maintenance/equipmen
M
feasible from existi ! ng residences..
IM
I --
ifffe projects e
t staging and parking areas, as far as
1, 1, 1, 190 0 M, 0 LO -111 ba* I'M I
040 M"01
Ewe
MMIMEM'I =A&
rat M40
a - wl Ll 11"""""`
Would the project:. Impact Mitigation Impact
Page 47 of 61
City, of Petaluma DeCristo Multi -Family Project
Sources: City of Petaluma General Plan and EIR; and City of Petaluma Implementing Zoning Ordinance.
. . ........
Population and Housing Setting: The 2,025 General Plan contemplates development of approximately 6,000
additional residential units and a buildout population of approximateiy72700. This represents an annual, growth
rate of nearly 1.2% per year. The project would add 13 for -rent, multi,-familydwelling units.
project is expected to add approximat�ely 35 people.
A
PopulatJon and Housin"abaact Anarlyffs'[,sl
9 P
M I
impact
111 under criterion.
would not be removed D
in housrn
Populaflon anid Ho:usi*ng'Mifigat'ion Measures: None requireld.
PUBLIC SERVICES
a Fire protection"?
b') Police protection?
c) Schools?
d Parks?
e) Other public facilities?
❑ ❑ � I A
. . . .......
Sources,,, City of Petaluma General Plan 2025 and EIR.
Public ServicesofPetalumachargesone-timeimpactfees,onnewpr*11vatedeveopmentto
Setting: The City
offset the cost, of improving or expanding City facilikies to accommodate the demand generated by new
development.ImPactfeesareusedtofundtheconstructionoreXpansion of capital improvements. Petaluma
also collects impact, fees for open space, parkland, andother amenities, Development impactfees are
,
Page 48 of 61
City of Petallumd
UeCristo Multi-Fam'Hy ',Project
. .... ... . . . ... . .... . . . . . .. . . . .. ......
ISO,
Public Services ImpaGt, Analys
4.15 (am'b) (Fai're & Plofice Pr,ote�ctiwon) Less than Significant IMrpacts The project site is located in an
established residential neiqhborhood thatis well served by ex[sting public services, The increase in resiclents
IL
ANIL
Its
stations,
MISM 11,
-emp ioln ana tnei
pre
....mergency response venicles to override t,,raTTIC controls with 11i s,irens:, a Signa
mr�
tr:ave
Y o travei: in opposing
I w SmIrAft"I MIREMEM � 11 I=Jm=JM=E-4FI�mmmImmmmI
'Ah
is I
t
*1 w it
he ablinty of
anes, in congested conditionsO
I WOE
AM m
Alt
[t AM [RE470 M L
T t R
14MM10,11, 41*1 Ow 6 11 L v7d 7" WR -9 LM 4 VK*- Ki -9, 10 V P
.. . . . .....
Rage 49 of 61
City of Petaluma,
a
be no:"impacts related to other r public facilifies,,,
A
.mow .1 c Se JVJ ces, Mitigation, MeasuNone
res:
requi,red,
4.16, RECREATION
. . ................... . ...... . . - . .. . . .. . ......... ............
Would the project:,
a) Would the project *1
DeCristo Multi -Family Project
.... ....... . . . ..... ... . .. .. ........ . .. . .. .... . .. .......
ncrease cne use or exiburig
a a
neighborhood and regional parks or, other
recreational facilities such that substantial ❑ n �
41
physical deterioration of the facility would occur or
be accelerated?
atfacilities,b), 'Does the project include recre ional: or
require It h, construction or expansion of
recreational facilities which might have an U ❑ � U
adverse physical effect on the environment?
. . .... ...... .... ...
.... . . .... .. . . . .. .....
2025 General Plan and EIR. . . . . .. . ...... .. ...... ..
1: �-- 11 1 , I L I— -1--l- ..............
Recreation Impact,Analysislw
otentiai implacts
-p: to mitigatie any p 0
'Irly 'Is
The 13-unft Mult'L-
IF 11
I facili ti , es. The
!iiii�ilgibl
be sufficient,to me�e .-
Recreation Moltigatlion Meas:ures. None required.
Page 50 of 61
City of Petaluma DeCri:sto Multi -.Family Project.
-------
C:J addressina the circuiation sVstem, including transit, LJ� Li
roadway, bicycle and pedestrian faciflitie!s�?
lict or be
the project con
y increase
feature (e,. YM)
ZMA,
hazards due
,sharp curves
intersections) incompatible
or
equipment)?
to :a geometric
or dangerous
5
u � u
U
d):in inadequate emergency access?
FM
'M 0 Wng
dL x-, 01 r'ULdIJUIId DIU
CUUTWET00 0 N
Safe Routes to School Plan and Technical
California Office of Planning a Resea rc;n
rI-V-W48 av
per day, within Petaluma.: The cir.
m iles of streets including arter'lials)
1 AW
'HIM M 71,14 M I 12, Ems
collectors, connectors, and: loca,l, streets.
IM 4 Sk MR "H&I91 qL NMI INURM a IMMI
V),-7,
Trt
BliS Street and East
he intrersection OT L
waystop, sign controlled,. -
M
General Plan Policies: Mobility
The following General Plan policies are particularly relevant to the proposed Project.
5-P-10: Maintainn level of service (LOS) standard for motor vehicle circulation that ensures
an intersection
goals. LOefficient traffic flow and supports multi -modal mobilityS should be maintained at Level D or
'better for motor vehicles due to traffic from any development project..
Page 51 of 61
City of Petaluma
mp,a!!ct Analysis.
trail at the site frontage t
DeCristo Multi -Family Project
. .. ... ........
E.
ry
NOW]
a Ill
ire weii connected
within an established neig borhood in the Ully 01,
rdinances and pohues relating tome circu "aion
the prolect, ; Irncludes development of a public recreational
W
Washington Creek, The projeCrt al S o i
ncludes frontage im,provem:ents along EIIIS
tter, and accommod tes three pa -aTne-
. . .. . ...... .. .....
Page 52 of 61
City of Petaluma-
. . ......... .....
DeCristo Multi -Family Project
. . ... .....
51ir EM, 0"1"'1111
0 W2
SM
M WMMM' M �
Mill!
ry
ry
ry
A
vM
Trane
sportabon Miftigation Masures. None required
:,emporary
i m pa cts torvrv
C) Wbuld the projeCL uause a substantial adverse chang
in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defin&
in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either
-site, feature, place:, cultural landscape that 'I.
eograp ically efined- in terms of
g
the size and sco
of the landscape sacred place, or ob I
ject with cu:ltura
value to a California Native American tribe, an, d thatis
Listed or eligible for listing in the Ca: iforn"I'a Register
of Historical Resources, or 'in a, local register of
historical esour,ces as deflined, in Public Resources
Code section 5020.1 (k), or'!
all Ia
Trwai Cultural Resources I rn pact An alysis;
W L, K rwM I
Mi 110
rill
ry
MM
Page 53 of 61
Ilk
City of Petaluma .. .... .. . .....
. .. .......
than signif"icant impacts to tribal cultural resources..
TI- Is A V K
Huai, CulturaI Resources Mitigation Measures, None required.
1.19. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMO
Would the project.
a) Require or resu
new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or
Storm water' drainage, electric power, natural gas, Li ❑
or telecommunications facilities, the construction or
relocation of which could cause significant,
El
environment -a" i eff'ects?
IN
b) Have sufficient water supplies ava ilable to serve
the project and reasonab ly reseeable future
I
d,eve::,,o meint during norma I I d,ry, and multiple dry
years'?
Result in a,
9 a
treatment proviaer
by the wastewate I
which serves or may serve tnq
erve tn e
that mit has e capacily to s
mie
:ected demand in addilion to e
C
provicier's, existing commi-
-%nss of Stat;I&F
I WI
n exuizi
Generate solid waste
0 1
e
x ot me capaci 10 c
o
n.
Otherwise impair the attainme
t
solid waste reduction goals'?
Comply with federal, state,
and reduction statuties and
solid waste?
,
Sources,-. City of Petaluma, General Plan 2025 and EIR; Water, Resource and Conservation 2015 UWMP;
a n d Sonoma
Count Water Agency 2,015 UWMP. . . . ....... .- _ - _ - --- -
Service systems S:ettlngs%, The City's water supply 'is sourced from the Russiian River Water
Utilities and is
the'Rusisian River Water System obtained vi
Sm aaa
,. i A J"%I� +k vy-% i ir-i k in r%rm-frnf-%f w4ith thA �nnnma �:nunty Water Aaencv (SCWA). The City's Water
El
City of Petaluma . ..... . . . ....... . ....
DeCristo Multi -Family Project
'10
1W
q
This assump, io:n is based on most, likely outcome of
X11 -
M i
ALIWAIL
M Op
proposed improvements to the water delivery sy -n
project (Policy
ThA Fii�� rrPPk Water Recvclinqall wastewater generiated by the City of Petaluma and the
per day (average dry eathizo
rflow). Approxitive (b) minion ganorts,
''I - I- -**w -1 lea-vinq a proximateiy i,t
mately
minion gaiiuii
A,
secondar
M M RENEW-- OEM
An
Elm
Pik
M M,
lip"
Ir
ter
tr
AM
WMAIi
AM
A
0', NOW- iwi&m VIA V FtAvl WA MWE
AffL'
Oil
City of Petaluma ..... ... ..
DeCristo Multi -Family Project
RJR!
OF SONE ELM
WOR&
ff I
IR's mom FIA
I BITfi
t.
MEEN
tt
FEW
AW,
A mar
ErAh"
JOE INE IWIM
0 0 WWA
W1 NEELW,
I
City of Petalum
DeCr I Isto Multi : -Family Project
. ... ... . .......... .... . ... . ... .
� wm,'� T
911 M^1, I "I
waste. However, 'as a residentia
Policy 4-P-21 r
L.J
U, NONO ITJ,
AL 4kV_tUWV U 11., H I IN
OF VW 1W. W ZJ mlll�
0, map
4,20, WILDFIRE,
... .... . . ... ...
Potentially
Significant
Would the project: Impact
. . . . . ............. . ...........
If located in, or near state responsibility areas or lands,
classified as -very high fire hazard severity zones, would
the project:
,
,a) Substantially impair ,an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan, ?V
Due to slope,, prevailing winds, and other factors)
exacerbate, wildfire risks, and thereby ;expose
project occupants to pollutant concentrations, from
mi
a wildfire b) or, the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?.
# Is
Re q U ire t he installation or maintenance of
associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel
breaks', emergency water sources, power lines or
a A S 0
other utilities hat may exacerbate
E
fire risor that
?MPI
may result in temporary or ongoing acts to the,
?
environment
E
) Expose people or structures to significant risks,
0
including downs ope or downstream flooding or,
landslides
, as a result of runoff, post -fire slope
Page 57'of 61
❑ u �
/t
Less, Than
joft U to 0-8
bigna - mant
A's, It
WIM
MmIjo 4
mitma ion
I 1 �
H
City of Retaluma
. ....... ...... ... ... . .
instability, or drainage changes?'
ueu'*�risto Muld-Family Project
IN
MO
F QWW-
Ira
ENOR 1, VA
rO
in
breathin odor, and reduction - *s'Ulity.
Wildf, re Impaict Analysis,.
FAR,
y.
d or fullenvironmental impact reporl for a project may be required where the project has a signiTICant
A focuse
effect on the environment in any of the following conditions:
... . . ... . ... .......
— —
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less than
No
I
Significant with Significant
Mitigation Impact
Impact
the
Impact
Would project. Incorporated _ _ __ _
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the
quality of': the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels)
:community,
threaten to eliminateplant or animal
reduce the, number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered: plant or animal or eliminater important
examples of the major periods of: California history or
Prehistory?.,
,
b) Does: the project have impacts individually
that are
limited, but cumulatively considerable?* ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the 'incremental effects of a U J � J
project are consicierable when viewled in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of other
Current projects, and the effects of probable future
Page 58 of 61
W
City, of Petaluma
DeCristo Multi -Family Project
.. .. ........ . . ........... . - -------
C) Does the project have environmental effects, which will
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
a a indirectly?
either direcuy or
lindings D 6
Mancia,tory V iscussion.
p,roposei
reSwk.rildent"i'al uses and accessory structures, T
U
neighborhood. The roject site 'I's currently occupied by existing
neral Plan Land Uset
"Ad above in the o
haoitat communitie
a t
mitig:ation measures
iblpresence of spleA
and outfall ofstorrnwi
MA
M.
all N A A i W, AN
Mea,sure.c... req
with the G,,t irnd supports the goals,
o
I
13,, u ni t
policies,
development on the projectsite is clonsi term
NOW LI -W-1,0631
92 i, W M MA
A s: d e s.,b,�,
JIM 111rdiffl Loll 1101111 MIS
:;�et Torth
H
I a B
in the 131 Oloqical! Reso
I
urces discussion ensure,
-staltus ba
e
s esting raptors, ni
4ue to po&F,, iall n
T100 p ain, ter to Washing on Creek will be,r
that potential impacts,
a -F irds or w teVowl, f Oil to the
assen
"Mii.
M a W a
1 1, tigation
Page 59 of 61
City of Petaluma DeCristo Multi -Family Project
A
130111, A.
Site Plan and Architectural Review Drawings for 109 Ellis Street, prepared October 9, 2018: and
November 2,9, 201,8w
Tree Preservation Plan for 109 Ellis Street, :prepared by Sherby Sanborn, Novembe
D. Historic Resource Evaluation for 109 Ellis Street,prepared by the City of Petaluma,
E. Soils Investigation Report,
d I Sit
F. Phase lEnvironmentai
SOC,r
prepared by Reese & As lates, Oct,o ler 3, 2018.
r 161 2,0180
May 1, 21018.
H. Preliminary Stormwate
2018.,
r Control Plan, prepared by Steven J
�'��i� �: I �:7 �ZiZd11 irl � � �� T� ��� ��C�Ti7
0
I & Associates, Inc.1 December
o
1. City of Petaluma, General Plan 2025 and EIR.
2. City of Petaluma Municipal Code and Implementation Zoning Ordinance
April 2017.
4. California Environmental Quality Ac
Management District, May 2017.1
j
Quality Management District,
Q
ity Guicennes, prepared by the Bay Area Air, Quality
f; City of Petaluma 2015 Urban Water Management Plan, prepared June 2016.
70 2008 Energy Action Plan Update, prepared by the Calif
ornia Energy Commission,
h'ttp,//w����ww.,el:nergy,.ca.go,v/``2,008publica�tions/CEC-100-�2008�EMOOl/"`CEC-1 00-21008-001,PDF,'acces:Sed
Apr"' 3, 2018.
8. 20111 Energy Efficiency Strategic Plan, prepared by the California Energy Commission,
h tt .,//www. e n e rg Y. c a.Y .001ft 4h
-4ov/ab758/document�s,/CAEn:ergyEfficiency,%,),trategicPlan Jan,201'1.pdf, :accessed
April 3, 2018*
9. California Scenic Highway Mapping System,
httpil.41://www,.dot.c,a.igov/,hq/�Lan:dArch/"`16 filva�bility/'scenic highways/inaekh�tm, accessed March 2019,
10. 20,16 California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen), Effective January 1, 2,017
Page 60 of 61
City of Petaluma, C:allforniq
.001% t wMi IoDment De6o"',,artment
communi,y Ueve :, I P
F"11e Number:: F'10'le No,, PLS,R 18mm0030
�54 M
7,77" 11,10 1 77,71
IS M-1111 IMM111 117111
7,
RM777 i ROME
7777777;--M!117� tzq�I"tll MIN 1 11 �7,� IN
M %7 'ev ........
IN
11101 WING nama,
ON
0�
An
ii
SIIl ward rQ441 to
urploise 17-11TITRY
1w
monitoring,,Treporting re,spoinsiI3
trustee agency
is to: (1)
ility,
be
Implearnentat'il,on
the lead ad-venc
MLW. E =129,I �,'WI
o re qO" u r
C v
ltyi of Petaluma; other- agenc'y
mitigation, kz.) ident*F,Y
responsible o
Xft
luontrac
I I
The follow I i ; ng; table 1*1sts each of the m'lt'i'gat I ion
,1 r irnefram
—mn ad'I*Or F
respons*ibil'i"ty relportring requirements an
1mp1em:entaon
M
Z
Z
M L a a
dthe status: of compliance waith the M' i t i : ga ion measureff
I
on A offs
C
on s,hall be Inisted ascond
00ft a if
b. Mfiltvi6rvativion measu
I
res required during lons
I III
1piiqlqpq I IMMU11_3
to M, '#Pan$ W-ALWO
wm� �Im
MI
sir
8. The a
Yant sh'
responsible agenc`ies to
MI,
t
A
Monoitorlin,g and e o,rtwi n
ivi sions, an Fs
ts
if rvradinry and bui: ding, perami
6 15
con ormanice wl !: e
cond'i'tlions, mitigat4i'on measures
8
and pr
rip ion and all app *icable codes,
,, review
b""ir I of a site design
p: ova I
Mt p p rove p roji e k, L lesic
e q u i r le ani e prior to
mprovement plans,, grading:plans, or,building: permits.
re that applicant obtained from all
'
I
to
responsib I e a enic'ies and that the plans and specifications conform to the permit requirements prior
the issuance of grading or building permits.
3. Prior to acceptance OT
r improvements a Certificate of Occupancy,, all*idniprovenients shall be
, or issuance
subject to inspection by City staff for compliance with the project description, permit conditions, and
approved development or improvement plans.
4 City inspectors shall ensure that cactivities occurin a manner that is consistent with the
of approve ans an :Con i ionsapproval.
2. The Plann'I'ng Division sha ensu
ire epartment shall rev*iew the'improvernent and
Awk,
DeCristo Multi -Family Project - City of Petaluma
Mitigation Monitoring, and, Reporting Program
ii IF IN �,Oil I,
Ilk I C I D r
IVIIIIUHIIUIV IVItHJUKt I%J I N
TOr WgRIVe UUS.L d,rlU tfAildWA UU111%, C111 koU11,-3L1U%,wL1U11 Ok.,LIVILVC� 311011 L.K.;
design and construction
incorporated into all demolition and construction plans to require documents.
implementation of the following.
porgy
areas, a
2. All hau
oads) shall'
I trucks transport I in
0
S01111, san#
odic inspections
V
[ic ion to
ensure tnat mea
other or oose mater -jai shall be t are in place.
i rev
LIE N T& 61�
Mat of 0
NEW. toAt ip-ast once oer nay. e use
using we�'T powt
dry power sweeping is pronibited..
4. All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 mph.
5. All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed as
soon as possible. Building pads shallbe laid as soon as possible after grading
unless seeding or soil binders are used.
6,, Idling times shall be minimized either Y sUtting equipment off when not in
11 the
ITuse or: reducing maximum idling time to 5 minutes (as required by the
California airborne toxics control measure Title; 13, Section 2485 of California
Code of Regulations CCR]),. Clear signage shall be provided for construction
workers at all access points.
71. All, construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in
,accordance with manufacturer's specifications., All equipment shall be
I by determined
4checkea a certified mechanic and to be running in proper
,
working , condition prior to operation.
8. Post a publicly visible isiole, sign with, the telephone number and person to contact
at the Lead Agency regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and
• ►� I�IJ��r� 7
Building Division
a — -
#raft Marcn: 1%, 2019/ Revise.dApril 16, 2019
M
y Project -City of Petaluma
...... . ... .. ..
DECRISTO MULTI-
Mitigation Mon itoring and Reporting Program
CO M P LEITE D
. ...
.. .. . ......
. . . . .......... . ....... .. ... ..... .. ... . . . ... .
ne-4tinn xAtirnin AR hniirc Ihin, air HI rlriw"r. n:nnnp, ntimnp-r snaii
EA
AN&
100 feet of
in �project
nearby sensitive receptors, including the following: design and construction
t of disturbed surfaces at, any documents.
simultaneous occurrence OT excavation, zradin and ground- „_ _ _, _ ______�__.__
struction activities on the s
1. Activities shall
one time.. The
disturbing con
avoided.
2. Idling time o
minutes.
I All
wit
be Phased to reduce the amoun
Oalic 11115, 1". 1 1
E;N Iwo*: w
amle area at anv, one time should be
a , iesel-powered construction equipmer
construction equi ent dw I trucks, and generato
pmI 1 , tese
h Best Available Control Technology for emission reduc
41 Require All contractors to use equipment that meets California Air Resource,
Board's {GARB) most recent certification standard for off-road
diesel engines.
........................ . . . . ... . .......
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Planning Division
Building Dilvi:sio:
%A to I
U I I U U %.o %V, %.VF I I V.
L
V, that would impactBIO-I To avoid impacfts to, roosting bats, any proie�ct activities
"' �""""""`
potential bat roosts (building demolition) shall be 'Initiated outside of the conformance with
CDFW
maternity roosting season (March 1—July If demolition cannot occurmeasuresherein.
. , �., •. �,-- - �--� ----� _.._.._.. Planning Division
iL% 016% JO% AOR% %0% ^1 a I Ap" 4- 0111% 04 % A if t,%
I
#
Page 4!of 12 Draft March 19, 2019/ Revised April 16, 21019
xx
I
. ...........
!
fis U I-
RESPONSIBLE COMPLETION
IMPLEMENTATION
MITIGATION MEASURE
................
VAJI ILAL LL 1LAj,1j,,>W %A%,otA%J1 I Ill
birds prolieciea by
For the protection ofspecial-status birds, and native nesting
B10-24
outside
''"r'•`"••-
sfiall, occur of the nesting conformance with CDFW
the MBTA and CFGC, future Pactivities
season from September 1—January
31, to the extent feasible. measures herein.
• Planning Division
• As required, conduct
'bleactivities Qualified
If XA/nrLepincr niitrzirlP nf thp- np-sting season is oossl and �prolect
within B10-1 Withion 48 hours prior to the "n't"ation of rroject work the top of bank of "'"'%J""
%J1: %a I
a,
Washington Creek, a qualified biologist shall conduct d preconstruction survey and CDFW if species t" n 1:1 A,
for western pond turtles. If a pond turtle is found during the survey, a qualified I present.
t tS
itOUibiologist shati relocate de of the work area, or it shall be allowed to move
out of the area under its own power.
. . .. .......
includingaquatic special
B10-4: To avoid and minimize potential impact to species,
Incorporate into
status fish species that may be present within Washington Creek, the following construct -ion,
a
shall be Implemented:
,
VOR:,
documents.
10 Install and maintain a screen placed at the end of the 12 -inch, inflow pipe and,
6 -inch outflow Pipe to prevent accidental entrapment of special status fish and
other aquatic species.
Page 5 of :12
• Installation of screen at,
inflow pipe shall be
verified by qualified
biologist.
0 0 0
Planning Division
PlanninRy Division,
10 Public Wor,lks,
DeCristo multi -Family Project - City of Petalum,a
... ... ......
MITIGATIONI'MEASURE
U
Mitigati,on "anct Reporting Progr
Monitoring am
. .... .. .. .. ...
3, Prior to construction, the contractor shall be required to prepare an Accidental
S. All stockpiling of construction materials,
Is and supplies, including
storage of chemicals, refueling and maintenance, with
the exception of
stationary equipment,possible occur as far as outside the creek channel.
No equipment shall, be washed where runoff could enter the creek.
6. No motorized equipment shall be left within the channel (top of bank to top of
'I,
bank} overnight.
7. All construction activities shall be conducted in "Isolation from flowing water.
.... .. . ..................
t4 i- iinfnnfin I i m in rT to \A/:4tp'rq of the united states
COMPLETED
i: ANN
IU dVL)IUI I I IIHII I 114t-.: 0" V 3;-.
/AppIlLdIR
incorporate into
'
and waters of' 'the state (Washington Creek), the 'following shall be
construct -ion punning Division
imnlementeA -
Muffil-Farnily
Petaluma
DeCri 'sto
ect - lu k ity of
DEC'RISTO
MULTI�
'A Monitoring
and Reporting Program
.Mitigabuti
MITIGATION MEASURE
t,vrvirLc i 1:v
Washington Creek, then a 404 permit from the Army Corps, of Engineers shall lfrequirred, purchase
i.. .:.-0-
' mitigation bank credit
and submit proof to
4. Compensatory mitigation for temporary and permanent impacts to the
Wn-(;hington Creek bank, if determined necessary by regulatory agencies (�tk,.oul-vv
City and CDF'W/RWQCB.
significance of the discovered resource and provide, treatment in the event ot
recommendations. Should a significant archeological resource bie identified a 'I potentially significant
qualified archaeologist shall prepare a resource mitigation plan and, monitoring �� archaeological resource
program to be carried out during ,all construction activities. Prehistoric discovery,,.
archaeological site indicatorsinclude:_ obsidian and chert
chipped. I include measure on
stone tools:,Lgr,imndin andmashin imp,lementsLe. .sabs and handstones and� �----- -...... —� prqject_construction and. ,
m1,11:o,,11,rtars and_pestles): bedrock outcrops and _boulders_ with mortar. cups; andNiMprovementplans.
ilocally darkened midden soils.. Midden soils may contain a c ombination of anlr
of the previous ly listed items w'thossible addition of bone--, and__shell
remains _and fire affected stones.s
't,eindicators generally '
AN frpl:,.ments of glasst_ceramic, and metal 11-1-11 1milled and split_lurn b e2=2
and structure and, feature remains suc,.
h a s_buildi�foundations and discrete I
trash deposits. ems. ., well*V.-"V pits dum.
Page 7 of 12
DeCristo Multol-Family Project - City of Petaluma
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
. ........ .....
MITIGATION MEASURE
...... . .....
IMPLEMENTATION RESPONSIBLE
trai pian aluf WILI 1 61 (JU11 116
Compliance with Applicant/ContraGEO-1. Prior to issuance ot agrading permit, an erosion con
and drainage plans shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review. All
ica
approved erosion ctor/Gelotechn
earthwork,grading,trenching, backfilling, and compaction operations shall
be
controlplan. I Lngineer
conducted in accordance with the City of Petaluma's Grading and Erosion
PublicWorks and
Control 0,rainance #1576 TitleTitle 17 Chapter 17.31 of the Petaluma Municipal
U
Utilities
Code. [nese pians shall detail erosion A
sediment capture, equipment staging and laydown pad, and other erosion
Buil
control measures to beimplemented during construction activity on the
IF & ..
• Applicant/Contra
ctor/Geotechnica
I Engineer
Public Work,
0
U tip li ti e s
and
V
Building Division
Dr,aft March 19, 2019/ Revised April 16, 2011
G
DeCristo Multi-Fami ly Project, - City of Petaluma
Maltigati , on Mon"itoring and Reporting Program
HAZ-1. In: order to avoid potential impacts related to the release of
Submittal of asbestos, Planning Division
Rio
materials or lead-based paint, an asbestos survey adhering
to sampling and lead based paint
Fire Department
outlined by the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act AHEF-%A) protocols screening.
and lead-basedscreeningPaint shall be conducted priorto demolitionot the Development andBAAQMD�,
existing structures. In the event that such substances are, found, the applicant
implementation of a I!
shall be subject to requirements set forth by the Occupational Safety and Health
removal and disposal
fllits lead standard contained in 29 CFR
Administration OSVIA AHERA requirements,
plan to be submitted to
1910.1025 and 1926,.62 and any other, local, state, or federal regulations. the rit C0nd arried t
y,
Treatment, handling, and disposal of these materials shall adhere to all Y,
by the contractor.
requirements established by OSHA and other agencies.
J Permit from the
BAAQMD if required.
. .. .. .. ... ......... ... . .. .. .. . . ..... .. . ....... . . . . ..... ........
...... . ............. ... . ... ..... ... . ...... ..
.........
F,Applicant
tip Applicant
shall secure
detached outbuildingonsite shall ue,HAZ 20 The existing well contained witn a
pp I
decommissions,or,
properlydecommissioned in accordance with a ficable Planning Division
abandonment permit
regulations established by the County of Sonoma (Permit & Resource
County Public Works &
from Sonoma
a deconstruction permit shall be
Management Department1.,
As application,
l
obtained from the County of Sonoma and all provisions therein, shallbe
Permit &_Resource Utilities
implemented. Management
Department and provide � �
the City Department of
Public Works and
Utilities ,with a copy. ;_ __1I
M'
1
.Awl
Applicant shall secureApplicantcantHAZ-3 Any 9 buried holdin tanks including septic systems shall be properly
decommissions or
0theDivisiondecommissioned 'in accordance with applicable regulations establ'ished by Planning
abandonment permit
K
P
e a
it 0'emoval of
& Rmmediatela
tnCoFmi Plublic, Works &y
from Sonoma County
f b y b At ollowed ackfill'in accordance j i
nd tanks shall be0 &_Resource
Utilities
undergrouY
Permit
with Engineering recommendations. Materials shall be properly disposed of at— - -
permitted facilities.Management
'Department and
provide the City with a
copy....... ........... 1111—
f i F rl M jol I 0-k O"l I A, :K I M V It I A —r:fllllllllllll` rl f-% I I A 'I I
'Iti i I
DeCristo Mu -Family Pro'ect - C*ty of Petaluma
Mi"Itigation Monitoring land Reporting Program
MITIGATION MEASURE IMPLEMENTATION
'Affiffil
be incorporated into the detention basin design ana
conformance with
the pipe shall Planning Division
pipe.: As appropriatehe 6 incri outflow
measures herein.
� be positioned ata 45 -degree angle to the flowline of Washington Creek. OL t::1
Building Division
water quality control measures as prescri
implemented.
bed by the RWQCB shall, be Incorporate into project `"
design and construction Public Works &
rinriimants.
Utilities
tru ction ortne resiUerlLLIC11 UU1 IU11%Zo VVILlIIII Ll 11;Z; I I 1%aWN-A I "A111[ HYDRO -2: Following cons design and construction
i i ion
of
r Planning D*v's* to occupancy,, the elevationthe lowest I
Combining District), and prior
documents.
floor, including basement. shall be certitiecby a registered
professional
guildinR Division
surveyor,certificationengineer or to be properly elevated. Such or
',
verification snail
be provided to the Floodplain Administrator, As determined
1. All new improvements shall be anchored to present tlotation, collapse, or
lateral movement.
2, All new improvements, be constructed with materials and utility
shall
equipment resistant to flood damage and using methods and practices to
minimize flood damage.
3. All electrical, heating, air conditioning, ventilation, and plumbing shall be
designed and located toprevent water from entering or accumulating within
components during flooding., � I'
4. All new construction and improvements shall insure that fully enclosed areas
flooding be designed to
ub ect to
the lowest floor that are sbelow
automatically equal®
ze hydrostatic f1000 T
orceson exterior walls by allowing
for the entryand exit of flood waters. A minimum of two i not less than
one square Inch for every square foot of enclosed area shall be provided.
.......... . .
.. . .. ... ............. .. . . . .. .. . .... ..... . . . .. .. .....
NOISE ......... ... ..... ..... ... ....... . . . . .. ...... Owl
_- -- — - _ -_— _
Draft March 19, 2019/ Revised April 16 2019
Page 10 of 12
0
0
DeCrl I sto'Multol-Family ProjeCtr - City of Petaluma
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
W,
throu,h Fridav and betwee
&0 raw
Construction activ 1 ities shali b
Local Holidays.
and 7-Q.G 5:00 p,m,, on Saturday
0, nda s and State Federal
t prohibited on Su Y�
• Incorporate, into project
and
design and construction
t
21
a
innecessary idli
Locate ationa
#ortable power
ng of *Internal cornbust, r ion en,gines shall be st,r*1ctly prohibifted.
P
noise -generating equipment such, as air compressors or
&A ar. rr If t4jw I
iaf
.enerr or
A
70MM00-
0
ise levels at t
tppropriate) shall be used to reduce no
he adjacent
eceptors. Any enclosure openings, or venting snali race away from
eceptors.
documents.
maintain delivery,
Provide notice t#
surrounding properties
rn era su re
60 Acoustically shield, stationary equipment located near residential receiver's with
temporary noise barriers,. Applicant shall provide
for periodic inspection
Utilize ionary noise sources where quieair compressors and other stat'7wt during construction to
technology exists. ensure that measures
i t 0 � �,.�,-+.,,,-+„-.n
014T0e theC chn1l hp PCztAt)11r,willcreatnrnn qh,PC1 ;410 locaiions tnat I
b. CI I a I lz� t
k., U HZJ L I U Lo L I U rD E)
greatest distance between the construction -related noise sources and noise -
sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction
activities.,
9. Locate material stockpiles, as well as maintenance/equipment staging and
parking areas, as far as feasible from existing residences. NOW—
MAPPW
Draft March 19, 2019/ Revised April 16, 2019
Page 1:1 of 12
DeCristo Multi,-Famnlly Project,- City of Petalum,,?
so 4 ft 0 It 'm%p
NArt" n g 'P ro ra m P'tigation Monitoring and Keo g
i
a I
—RESPONSIBLE
MITIGATION MEASURE IMPLEMENTATION
PARTY
.... . .. . . .
10. Control noise from construction workers' radios to a Point where they are not
audible at existing residences bordering the project site.
110 The contractor shall prepare a detailed construction -schedule for major noise-
identify generating construction activities. The constructiona
, plan shall
procedure for coordination with adjacent residential land uses so that
0 No # , it
construction activiti�es can be scheduled to minimize noise disturbance.
t
School to minimize construction noise,
isy construction activities after school hours
12, Coordinater With the McKinley
0
interference. As fleasiblie, conduct no
b M 0
or when school I is not in, session.
1W VNIVIMIM �m
schedule of��_isv n construction activities to the adjacent land uses.
a "disturbance
who would be responsible for
1 0
'responding to any complaints about construction noise. The disturbance
coordinator will determine the cause of I
he noise complaint (e.g., bad muffler, i
e. 1
e+LL..N , and will require that reasonable measures be implemented to correct the
Conspicuously post a telephone number �f'or the disturbance I
schedule.
... ... ... ..... ....... . . . . .. ..
COMPLETION OF
IMPLEIVIENTATION 1.
. . .. ... . . .... ..
Page 1,2 of 12 Draft March 19, 2019/ Revised April 16, 2019
M
A -T--r
Ai iACHMENT:2
. lu
0 6
li*cation for Si 4
Plan and Achitectural Review
MAM-11
I ML, RMWLL1WR a Ow w M
1.9,11niiresideiiha iro elet ntainina three. tiuve-wstlor
k.
0
t I*al zone wi h Floo n Co,m inin
9
(t
n �
isStreet(N007-361-003 e Proiect"'
including requests t�or a
T
v fi
e or the consti iet,ion o a
0
comprised in
M. rovements
,
Project site in compliance with state and local law; and
Conuni,s,sion considered
the -?'Ianning
n,clud i*ng the rel,ated Mitig e: Nega
mil
711wk 4�1
W U� I I I, I - I il M21- 1, SO,
Section 27,070 furtherprovides that the C ty may grant a wal*verl or
AS9 lZu
standards, the
MO 11 leation of' site 'eve opment standards to reduce on-site parking
number of spaces; and
and safety or physical environment or any real property that is listed on the California
Register
Histoz•ac
is not contrary0,F' Resource., and, to state or federal law" and
development"E AS the full onsite Parking requirement creates challenges for of
the
decrease units
andrequire in the proposed, "ot over t8
site at the requested density may
per' acre; and
eyir
�Igg 1111M
0
f'or t e proj ect an
With the City, approved by the City Council; and,
t,M*"g Zoni*ng Ordinance requires applicants
A
into a, Densl"ty onus Hous'i"ng A, m . nt
the projed[lo
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL AS;
FOLLOWS:
R1
a. The Project is consistent with the General,, Plan 2025 Medium Density Residentialland use
desigzlation in, that the Medium Densi't'y Residential provides for a variety of dwelling
types,, including single-family� andmulti-family ousing at a density of 8.1 to 18.0
units/acre.
c. cozisistent
The Pro'ect is wall development standards of the Residential 4 (R4) zoning
ib including
4ain* to uses setbacks bui*ldt*ng heilimited to those pert ing- ;ght,
di*strict not
floor area ratio.., and parlcing.
roleCIA i
QI
A* I 14'ALrIMLNT 2
wKmq6EU"0Rm`DING REQUESTED BY
AND WHIEN RECORDED MAIL TOI
C a
i t y of Petaluma
11 English Street,
ill! 11 11 11111 q AU
E
00-m 0 mit
n
13
"jw ..........
Space above ;this line for Recorder'
Ulm
C
D ME=*
ECLARATION OF R'ESTRI,!U"l IVE COVENA:NTS
by anid er
IW—A
a
Dlens'ity Bonus Agreemen]
s use.
all ml -
2-1-1
JIM%
0 f te-W-Mt t 41 Ill [Q1.0
L d Ow n,
U ;,o amily Trus
t-
an, i an, so eui ist I t
"Parties,,"
,v,el-y referred to herein as :th e
EWA" ]NNW
, 11006-Taq
A :
B Owner intends to construct,
3
on e rope yconsisin:
,9
Ca On
... ...... ..
(!'P
ri
onUs or e pr,ojec- an...
and operate a resi,dential idevelopment
aol�a menIts 'he "Proj,,e�cl
j r r
o e:ns,ii.y onus �o e y
recommen,,:e approva :: , e Cit
M WTAW��
D On 2019, the Cit,
y Crounc'11 of the -,CI*,!ty of Pietalum�a:k,': if uity Councl I
i ion
C.onsidered t -le Planning Comm'ss'
roved
re: ulested Y:'he Owner, and
5
recommend at"ilo n the Dens I It'y onus a
t:W�le Dens*1tv Bonus for the Pro*iec�t sublect to
Slu se uent Planning Uommission approva.
he e,xecution and recordation o is Agreement..
2-T-2
0, Definis:tgions.
is In,corp rat*i�on of Recitl
a, e% w,
Glow,
a
The Part'imes acknowl elidge
T -I
pf
X iff M ei:ig:ibility
the leyal author.*t..y to 1, pose rent anid income
pursuant to the Dens'lty,bonus Stat'Ute and the Denis yv
into th*ls Ayrieement&
t &
jr ves and concessions
Definoltions. The follow'"ing terms shall
bec i,on w erever use:, ifl:this Aqnrleelment! or the a:tt
have the mean*ings se: f'orth in th'i,(:�
hedexh ; 'b"ts
OVI.o.0%un Y1 rnia)
States Departmen
A
amt
A 0 M
"Cla*IMS, is d,elfine In tilon
It Zoning
�in"Density Bonus Ordwinance means ;the City o Petaluma mplemen'
Ordinance Chapter 27.
M
TI
1W
AL
21.1,...i,3
"Eligible Household" means a household that qualifies as, a Very Low -Income
Household.
IL
TIT
ELIS a wok W111631
"Indemn'ltees" is defined 'in Section 11.
4-1
MLq,,w—A I WL", Ulk MR! 112MIIMI 05 tw, 2
W
"Proj*ec.t" 'is defined in Reci'tal B,.
v I
"Pilo eirt," 'is defined "in Reclital A.
t*ime to time by th: ta"te of Cal,'Ifornl'a epartmen
le S
t of Housing�,Commun'Ity
pt
n Sect'l'oi,n 6932 of Tl*tle,25 oil,
P -
top%
ut)ii
egu a -iolis or successor provilsilon p
M
'f
Safety Crode Section 50093(c),.
2,10 Affordabl�o Restr It ctions.
'he Californiar COI e:o,lf
sEed pursuant, !to CaIrtornia, Health and
ro
111 T M11rWM1
WAUS WwO 9Lro14r4
11 be rented at
i
by E�I'Igwll' le
W
icteld: 'Unit.
Rent for Restr
A:ffordable Rent.
Rent or,triqz; ni s a e imit,e o
Max
WE
MON&
WF
L
W w w
'Its *n: the P
luxu Items 'in market,",rate uni i
4
3,t Tenant Slelection.
3,,Ol Market'in. BMR Un
uwner s all offer the B'M'' n it f,
row
e
uni in tI Proj'oect are otterliz; fo
: u youades and
77
ii1ect. The C*lty sha�l:l have -the right to inspect
Usie-n of City and CorU t
r rent at the same time o
a Am 1 11 A IN v
.4 a
f D IWORkinct-
ros i ve e, n an ts,.
. ...... .. .
r Srooneir
i
1:na,n
tne
arnar&ei-raie
-fn
ren IT ne uit,y rt'iia tallMIS
-7 Lan
11 e%
ees, o use su
Alk AS a FA
V 'a,
I M., I I
AL,
"W&OU I
VWW7 w
IF
I a U
a M
dp
r Oft
N't 1 It
WR
2 -Ll -5
11 accepit as tenants of the BMR Un'lt,, on the
persons who are recip'1'ents of federal
AMMA
subsi'di*es pursuant totne existin �5ec
y
t a APRk
ion b, program, or
n
may require prospective e. an o c oE e an
3
Aug
MW
Kul
e i ion
asis of racel olor,
m,ari ancest
■
creed, sex, sexual or*1entation, disa'b'1" ity,
ELM I
ME
-AL
""lot
7 F-�
I MA III LNK
WAT
m
ii
III I PR47oj I
VMS* 001ft
n C 11,
O"We
MMIRG fill
IITZ
�M�m ism
1WH
ro
wal-Ow''Alm
X111
w
(c) a c ert i f I C a t;1 o:n itha;t �the tenant 1,1SIOCCU LA% in
p T
U! rwiO
6qm-VA -M
"'mot
IP —
air
th the requirements of
I
I Ii
c,h
al Y le s
of pleopleresiod7ing in
112 "Saw
AW
Lvw�7M,
4.3. Maintenance of Records.
.. . . . . .. .... .
(1)
Owner shall maintain tenant leases, income certifications and other
years after the fi'nai
mi,a s re a e to the leasing of the BMR Un"It for a enod of fi've 5er
,ate of: occupancy by the tenant.
5
it a
4,.4 Access to Records,,* Ins ections,,.
56 Term of Agreement.,
erm of Restr'*ic,t'[ons.
This Aqreement shall rema�i*n 'in ettectuntil the fiftllrr
I
w
V 1 r fa - a r rcd&
anniversary OT,tne iss,
AM
clitto
et,ended by w r t- r ro,,,j e unlss thwe term is exi
Effecti
tNeeds Conve
vene:ss %�)uc%i
remain eittective anid fUI,I
11 for
assignmen,, :er,
in r e SII ere i; n
V
q
le,
E
inq r
Reconve'y qnce
expiration o,f the term.
.. . .. . .. ..
e
ci 1 r e �uiv
I certiticate of occ:upan,%rl-., o q., u a[ n
ritten ayreemen
ance lof Pro,pe,
........ . .
rMi
rt
of the al ies.
T ' : r _ '.: . rel :. - ;: .. t shall
erm hereof re, ardlessof any sale.,
U on the tierm,'10nation of this Agreement, the a,, ies
Ilii k'
it
I.
I�
relielment sha
in is g
a 0 a it A's
4--wel-0
A
An "I BE
ku 0 POW"i ilii
rmmm%L EL AN :2
t ana. eme
7* Firov",,er nt
m a
A% Aftk
and el'i'gibi ity evictions, collection of rents anid der)o,s
rout'ine and extraor ina el a! s, e acemento ca
ILA
maintenarn(Iii) landscia in
1+eN 1+nims. an securitv. C*tv
1 1" 1 AL; i shall
Y,
.ony, or managemen't or maintenance 0"]
ave no res'' si
0
"hie Property
r the Project.
MIL5 JL1
F FOUs M
t.
ARPIN
rv4vw_J1, NUMURRIM411 I R- M 1, rwA B L A ro. 1, 1 M.,
I air
Ili
II
h.
t.
alis ;
�_� II
Raw,�
MR
P ro le rt or Destruction.
A00%
*!,estroye uw
I or,
ren" rels ric ion
worotrl4,
10l
u,wner shall
Owner's
n E:xhm',bit B.
A
eauirements, set. forth 'I'n th*is:Aqrn,%ement,. Such work, s la -
Am
IV
Mmok A&
s
provision coni ic'wi he req,ui
en - e rs s, ,a prevai .
W
t en: of senior
enders,, the re:
irements of" such
LWIR J I b um'I R I I
'Ift A
,ate t
t.
f.
wr
4W
10. Default and Re,medi":e,sl,,
10.1 Events of Default.
.. ........ ... . .. ..... ......... ... ..... .... ...
events sha'11 constitute: an event
(a)
Project as requir
(5) days;
(b)
The occurreincen of anyone or more of the folllowing
of" default hereunder ("Event of Dlefault' iff
# AL
,he rig it to accelerate rer),ayment of such loa,l 1,
I
t.
4
�t
m 11w7MAN
tb19 PQ AL W, 7d,919.
2-1-11
d
ach of the remedies provi e:d here'In I'
may exercise from N. to time any
ri,ghts:and
,2nd not in lieu ol
any rights, anI:d remedies expres,sly
n emn'r ees armIIM _ess nd against a-11 1*1ab'111ty, 10b;j
-000 IL
L� W
mana., lement, or ol er,ation of''the Property and the Proj*ec
e m n Ifr" catio:n
ry
qWr W X q� 0, W
1"Mor a
alli
obl:lgatl
e gross n,e.
Sec; ton
im M
s a
survi he expiration or, earlier ter
12 M'ISICLellaneousil
12
writtlen 'Instr
mina,ioln of:th'Is ALgreeme
mom
2-1-12
11
I 7i
At�tentionf Cot:y Manager
0
Owner. Landis of DeCr*isto F,,amily Trust
1-i V
12.4 Further Assurances. :The Hart,ies sha ! 1,1
... ....... .
III! I i! I I �jj
'rem WA"i ffw-0.1&I
swell rO- H T M
SIAIR1.01 NA, 0LI IIS
A
A: reement.
,9
1205
Relationshl'
3
h, e intent of this
iii
ILIyrs
I q, ORO
4M
AIs S' we ji A 2, 11 i ray, I a 4
mven,urers or princt I pal and a"--:ent wi !It
Y
I I
i one anottier. The relations .1 o' -
V
r s emp Uy,,,ees s , a
agents o' y:"
aonty C3 kol#
s emp: oyees are not emp o'yees, o' City but ratheir
,a - :e Owner and
in epe,n:: ent, contractors,,, Furtherm,o,
ie or hold themselves out as em
171MA-A. nvvretE (i P
co lei
wne:r shaii not have any
,x,ceD az): I It, ma, s: �eci in wri
V
Y� o
o Cm r to'bindC,ity to any oblig,,a
I
UW
MUM its Un
City Mal ager, w'l'thout further
It; n
a
2-1-13
oraina,
w.
ot PLetailuma sha,
govern the same su *::eic
MOO,
12.9 Time is of the_Essence. Time is, of the essence 'In the pe ormance o Is
Agreement.
9
11110M Rp
OLC:lLqZ:; U1 \aamornia,...gai,\..4 L...
dWS U I LI It,
is
-10
heard 'in the Su,! � erior Court of Sonoma County,
Northern D*Istrl'ct of California,.,
Cou o r ,, 1=
1 Att,o:rngys' Fees an:.. any,
... ..... .. .
re e
t
me
to *inti r reor en o rce e :e�irms o is
IT
9
ciples, of
We �filed and
rnia or *In ithe Federa' District
'a a
ega or a ministrative actlion is bi,
I
loll,
Severabalwipi,ly, If
unenorceab'le a court o,f
11 6
vo
flif
e th'i's A &ment: is held invaii sion C-1 1 9
competent j i nil heval'Idity., legality,tJ
and
A M AVA
npaireE
ie,byl
I 1--1 W, M M =ISI1
are lin corpo rated:, herein y 1', is ire eren,ce.
12,.14 Couunterparts. This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts,
each of which shall be an original and all of which together shall constitute one
agreement.
SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGES.
'Regulatory Agreement and Declaration of Restrictive Covenants as of the date f'i'rst
written above.
a,.
Print Name.
... .... .. .
City Manager
........... ......... . . . .. .. ...... . . .. . ....... .. . . . .. ..... .. .. ..
I
p ICity Clerk
Claire Coo er
I
APP'R,OVED1 AS TO FORM.
Er*lc W. Danly, City Aitt,orney
S/r GNATU'RES MrUST B,E NOTARRIZEAU',
Q
-W" A
E-1, A�CKN(`j
CALI�FOR. N -M -i, ALL,�Ipu"OSI-w WLED G NI
M I I V In WA, I MIN Mil",IilllnE*T!"Rm'Ril-a�q"f MM' ffil" JUM'' 11,04-11MI, W10
Ir A
I fx
STATE OF CALIFORNI-L"I
i
COUN r Ty OF
signature
(Seal)
here 1*nsert name and fil"tle of the
WITN'ES�'� my hand and official seal.
proved to me on the basis of
satisfactory
evidence
tthe persons) whose names) is/ate ubscribed to the within and
0 1 1 110
dcapacity(ies),acknowledged to me that he/she/`they execute the same, in his/her/their authorized and
III
e Person s acte executed the 'nstivment.
il
-M
'Orflia that the !oregoing
(s), or the entity, upon behalf of which
A, Y
A IAn
Nxxv.lt" iOSE ACI<.N
CALEU 0 , Rli 1 11 11 Lv URP OWLED G NT
validity of that document.
STA'YE OF CrALIFORN'l[A
COUNTY OF.,
On
before me. (here insert name and title of the
oilicer 4--%ersonaiiy appeare
P
UVAR W
JL
t the, person(s), 014 the entity upon behalf of which
the tore:going
that thcefti*fy under PENALTY OF PERJURY un !er laws of the State o'... CaliforniaCnii
paragraph is true and correct.
W111NESS my hand and official seal.
Signature ., (Seal)
0
a
2-1-17
11
a
Income c Ition Form
rr�
T . INCOME ('E)#. 71V
11-tr-43111i ww",
(F) (G)
Mbr # Type or Asset C/I Ottslr Viadue of AssetAnimal Income from Asset
. ... . .......
......... .. . ....... ... . . ....
Ifover $5000 x 0.0%, (J) Ini,I)IrIted inc+�rne
Enter TOTAL INCOME, FRONT ASSE'rs, (I( the giresater of the totalof column 1, or J, income FI$
(1,,,) "I"otal Annual H rollSell old Income froni, all Sources ['Add (Fj) + (K)]
I
1111-�y &.,, -Iln j i - ---
HOUSEHOLD CERTIFICATION & SIGNATUR
son(s) set forth, in Part 11 acceptable wrificati n of
*fficinfornintioll Oft thi's form will be usicd. to: dcterjn* nr.\.'**jM(jjri income c11#SJ#b1N11wty* Vlwe have provided for etach pier
current anticipitaled annutil income I/Nve agree to noti�o the landlord miniedil"alicly upon Ony niemberot't'rhe 11011,S%ing oul, of thetin't or iiily new incrulmr-
Chold 11,10tv
mov ng, n, I/N Al Cme st: t ent,
I ve agree, to notl*�r the landlord 'immediately upon i4any incinber becoming a ft I
Under penalti"es of pe *ury, Uwe cert'i C
I y that the 'nformation presented 'in (his C critification is (nic tind accurate to th; berSt of my/ow knowledge a rid befief. '111e
llere* y IF
unuer'signed ffirt1wr understands thm providling fAISIC 4
III collstiltolies an act of haud. 1"alse, III isleadingor incorripic-1c infomiation ma e..it in the,
i ." se agreetnent.
S ign a, 1, u re
H
C`#"l*+CAC Tenant Xncnm+c Certification (May 1201 8)
2-1-20
'1111MINATION OF INCON
A R'l v D E' I IE FLIGIBILITY
I'U'I'AI. A
0
A -
INc'OMI�. FROM ALL S0)R11,ICT'A
Som
I
From itcm 1(I1) On ptagc
Currcnt I c ler
-al 1111:0111el.intit per,
I *,"AnlibF sizes
R
I IA 14,1 if I I 1(:)1id
Applicalic, (.' t ,1
rrent Fedcr`4,
Inconic 1,111"I'll't per 11amil VC,
y S3 1 -S
[1011SCIrlol(r] IrlICOIlle #IS !of MOVemww
1 4 1 1
1111it klectsFedelt I
Income Restrictilon (at:
11 will
u 50%
Unit Meds Diceper'J'argeting
Income Restrictlion 111,1
t--"
U
I fouschold S"'zc at MON
ONLl':
I21�,('I�:R'17RICA'I7ON
( I -I
�J'Ilrill`clllt Fit.
llrjC0 jj��e 1,1111111t X
I 140%:
"IlICOIJI'l (jXeee,(rS
fi
I 401X�, at rcciert"catilill' , 9
jim---1
is: m
El Yes sh."M0.4NO
............... ......... . . . . . . . . . . . .
PART NIL RENT
riviont'I'lly Rent, Federal Regn( Assist"11111ccM, *So-tirce.,
.........
7,7 --7 -7' F 7
A A
IN4thl I I C (I C Ill I I J'Z er I I's +0. 8 Nol it Ass Millict oll :y Utility AlloNvouice: $*
#I -g 0 "J"OtL1.1
Other Monthly Noti-optional clial csm 'y Itellt
is
"I" 11Oft tJNI#'[',*GROSS NION"11111"J111 R, �9J4 Iutility Allowatice &("Fell'ant p4aid rent plu
otliter, non-opholial chialTe's
1
xaI0
IN'slail"'I'Mill 11"'edet-1 LH`,FC IZC[It, Ifor
t
frApplicable, Maximum 10'edelf"I'M & State
1.11 ITC f3otul Rent Lilliii,t fior this t.init:l
Unit Notects f'eder(rd It(un't Restriction at,
11
,If A�a1p icable, LJnt Noieets Bonci Rent
l�,�slri����'�t gat:
4
[J11it Nfects Dceper'1'argetrjg iI(Crit
i�csirir,tio:i at;:
Is
*Sourcle. ol" "Fede,fl Assish"Illcie
I **I ItJf) 11fiilti-Farlidly i'rojece }3ascd RcntirdAs;;staiice (11
2
"cctiori 8.Notoderate Ruhabilit{zti011
3 Public HoE:sink,
4It���t���
11 HOMU,*' ���ist�iricc
5 I-Ji.lZ) Houl�irit; Cijui4c: V`oilC1jet* (IjC;V}, tefialIc-hased
6 1 [[lD I'r�,)jcct-I3a,Sccl Voucher (PBV)
7 tlfiDA Section 52 1 Rcrit��1 AssistanceProgram
I
8 0ther Federal Rental A sistiellice
lo Mlossirxg,
(PBRA) Includes'- Section 8 New Stil�),stiitit'l'zt,I Rehabilitation;
ScIctilon 8 Loan Notanagement, Scefion 8 Property Dis,l)os'l'tloti-..Seet"ot5i,202
Project Rential Ass istan-ce Contracts (11RAC)
PART V11, STUDENT Sjr`A.T`U`S
It ........... ON111limm" 7
tudelit to
x 1) 1 a Ill a ti 0 11
ALI, OCCUPAN"PS FULL "I'llhill'i' IS 1" '1 Is It"Yes, Enter stijacm explal
T
lial'on*
I I A F C AN F As s !'I S It
40
lrjj:ejj(tj, *01
(111SO Ott,16 (JOCU, t 1 0 2, J o 1) 11 1 ra I n i n g :I) rog ra f1i
y 1-1 o Single Plorentl[k,pendent Child
it Married/Joint Return
Es n tic r 5 Former Foster Care
PAR"I" Vill, PROGRAM TYPE
Mark the ,ofprograln(s) [isted below (It, through C.), F, I t INN, I - Nvli*cl,i th's houschold-'s un, 11 be c(vunted, toward threl proput
y occupincy
Irc-quIlretnents. Undler each pr0gram marked, indicate tile houselivoki's ljjColjrjr04 status its, estlab[islicid 'by (Iiis cer(lif cat cert ficatiollp
1: r I tio,"ire I
See Pal -it V 114ove,
Income S141111S
0 79-7101" 5:0 (1/o A M (311
IR
11 160OX, AM6
0 80% ANK-31
C4 Ijx Exempt Bond 0
h1conle Slonts
El 50% AMlGI
11 60% AMGyI
X 80% ANIGI
w rilil * *
d. AIIDP
11
hicome Stalits
El 80% AM(fl
W,
ul
m-tim,mile (00 according, to: cligibilit
"Uvon reccrulli i t I
ClIt ()I)t JI0tjjSClj()j(j Nviis deterni"ned over
reffillrelliclAs of the
WN
SlIGNA"111HIE OF OE R/Rif-*011 It 1�-OS F"A"FATI VE,,'
co ill 1:1
(Name of Program)
hicome S0111S
)roL#rtiuu(s) 1,11411"Ke(I t1b0vew
0 11111 1 1 1 111101V 4 V Ili Ba
r
Pat .11 o 1` th Ill p VV I ill 1111( 11f)(1 I -
0scid on (lie represcritudoll licre .1 upon the proof doem tile n it ation 1-c qu If red, to be submitted, the Idutal(s) 1,11(ttlic(Ir 1 1, is I C1111,11t
0 1,, 1 lon,
1011 V.; I I
Income Celfilletat, hire efig'ble under the provisiolls of,section 42' Internal Revenue Code, its ameltifoco, tand, the Land Usic R r*ct
4 0 1
A, I* appfical, le), to Hll NT 111 11 (1 it sli tIj'S I'l
greenient (I I 1 *0 c c L
'I V Elt
SIGNA"FURE' 0F OWN] AUREPREM"ON"I'Al DA 'I j
I
(111111('11% c r1re -fi f " , t N),
I i-0 ",A nant Income clef I leat 101i (mtay 2*0 1
Enter both Eflinitcay and ffivwe codes for cacli hous,e]-iold iber (see Mow, for codes').
"IT, NANT DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE
6
3
I
5
1,iast Nlime
Firs't Name
Disabled
The
it
Followiii Race Codes
s
-hotild
be ised.#,
t
I
a A 0 #
Wlitate - - A pel'Son, liaving, ot igins
4
in any of'thc I pcople of Europe,. thle Middle East oi,* Not1h, A I Wa's
2
B LiLack/African Allierwan
or w
- A pierson 11,aviJing origins in Iran) of the black rflcial grou,ps of A, fi-ica. Te' ri ii s s, u c h 41 1 a I t,i,,r,l ti apply to this
category,
3
Altnerican Indfan/Alask-i
NatiVe
A person having origins in any !of the original, peopIcs of Nol-th and South America (includIng Central
I **bal affifliation or community trittarC[Jjjje
Arnerica), a.nd who maintaien h I nit*
4
- As"Cul A person haVing
origins
in aln:y of the ot. giinai Peoples of the Far East, Southetast Asia, or the Indian st,ibconfinento,
4n, — Mimi Indin
4 b — Ch 111CSC
4c — Filipino
4d -- Japitflnese
ile —Korean
Vietfle
4g — Other Asiotill
5 - Native I Iffivi"I'llan./Othcr Pacine islander -,A person havmg origins in any of Ole origlinal peoples of Hm Samoa, or othiet
I van, Guam,
Pacific Is,111nds:
0 *
5a —Nailive Ha%virman
5b or (JOw"layo v,,antan
Se — SamotIrm
5d — Other Pilcific Isha, ii,de-C,
6 Oth
7 Did not J.CSPOrfid. „Please iflitil below )
Nofev# irlehill Ie mcial cate.gol-les Intiv be h0i"ceitecl as SuC11101* 13 1 - /I mei# *Ca) i hOhmIlt, laska Nw'v 11"It ile, 14b
I I it (Chillese.), ele.
�'��c FollowingLtIIt1iC1' CU+�eS should beI15C+[�:
or 1
1, - Hisj)anic - A person lolf Cuban, Mexican, Puerto Iticiani,, South or CentralAillerican, or Other Spanistl Culture ot bigin, reg,M] less ofrace.
rilterins such as "Lalfino" or "Spanish Origin" apply to this categor Y#
12 - Not His 10 'L OtIler Spanis
paitic -- A, pler'Son not of Cuban, Mexican, Pucrto, IUCER11, SOL101,01', ("entral Americian, of Ctilture or, origin, regm-idless
of raCC*
D'd ri j_e,S
,,pond. (Plem al hellaw
3 1 ase lilt
D i s a, bI1 *1 ty S it it it ul is
Ye's
Ifany nieniber of the household is, aisawled according to Fairr I-1011smig, Act defilnitionfior hifindiocrip (disab"I'li
Ity)
Aphy,sicalo.r�nic,nt,al,impaii-mcii:tNvli'*Ichsubs,tant'irillylimi,tson,col"MOI*cm4.Ijo 'i�tealctiNitie�sw,#tirerCoir-dolf�stjelilwi,il,iii,,pa'it�,*nictitol,
-ment and other ternis used ple,ase
le impan
being rcgarded as friaving such all impairmerit. For a definit'[011 Of physical mi'm ni! ntal
11 d -re tions/24
see 24 CFR 100.20 1, tawailable at _httpw.,Hfii4-ho,tj,2*n al-rese,(,irc 1/1111 -c-fi*I 100201,-deFjt,i:*It*t.,011,�l"ilf*
.. ..... .... .
Handi'cap" does riot include cut"rent, i'llegal use of or, a.diffletion, tota controlled substatice.
;II An d-ansge der. ual, 's ti indi N dual shallnot b: cons' d to have ,a. liandictrip solely bccrause that indi% I I C I n
3- I)icl tjc�trrespond (Please initial brioi
11 'm.t/Aj,)p11`caiii I do not, Nvish to flit-jush
d
in-fiormatioll 1.4ek-garifig etjjll*C:*t
,u Res de I I
(Initials)
(I II vi) 1. 2. 3.
0
.. ... .. . ...
41 A
I
. ... .. ....
5. 6,:
a
A
C - " A I
1writ ncome Cert"fleadon (Nlay 20118)
l"(AC r"I"i I I
2-111-22
MIN ILIA! M�
TENANT INCOMECT:R7'It�ICA'1'ION
e ive,
This )1IM its
Wfi
11,0adl-Develo: , #
p�11tictit'Dolta
inter
thetype
01"teliflutt cet-161-callotu Iti,itial Cet-til'ication, Rcccrti 1cfeltion (annual
reculification'),or 01lier,
ll"otlier, des-Ignatc the purpime
the
reccut"ficadon
(110than-stbr, iia changettihoitischold
coniposi t "tot], or otherMatc-requi,rcd
recertl I vni),O.
1 cat'
to December 3
I.Alf,c,ove Date
kilove4ii Date
Propertyaiile
Coutity
TVACJI
BIN fi
Add,res,s
Ifnpplicabic, CDVACT
Unii 'Numhc:r
11 Bedroorlis
Square Foot"age
Vacant Unit
0 it
Enter the ell I ecu've date oifthe ccrtif"icication. I'*01" DIOVC-111i, till's Should tic tile milove-1411, datco
nua Income ree I ve (late should be no late,i I'lian (,)tic year
[*or in I 'I crtl ficlation's, this c4l'C'eii
firom the el"I'ective diate of % the prc%11*(-')us (re)ccrtific
Enter the st recent date the household ttrux credit quaii1fic(i. "ni" Id be (lie move*min
IS COU
datc or -m an acquismion rellitt) propetly, th" ot the dtate lite, t(:111rilit I JoNfe
IS Is'll n d 1hito the
t "s (lie uwst recent date the managenient
co,nipany I jafificol (lie tmit for
ticonic (it I I
li'Wer (lie winic oftlic development,
ilding Is:;
c(lituNirtrileti,t) hi which thebu located.
Irliter Ove county (01� i I , I
Enter the pr,qlect number 4assigned to the property by "I"CAC. Picitrisic i nellude hyphems
betweell tile sta,te abbr enelat lion tour digit allocat" year, and j,)r(,,)" pec,fic nuniblel,
I ject S I
Imor exam -,2010- 123
p I c C A
liter the buc�ur��l WAr it. Ilding (front IRS Fonn 8609),11ntissig[lic(I to 01c bu
Etitcr the physicai ad(kcss of (lie building, Inclumlig Street, number atild mamerli cilty, stale,
and AP co(,Ie*
1f,pr(,)jec!t is, mwa.r(.,
Icd 4"No honids please enter the prOject, tiumber assigned to the property
A 0 0 0 0
b (I)LAC0. PIC i,clude hyphensbetwcien tile NtIMC abhrev nfioll, I" ur d*gi t, alloctriting
y ase it It 1 0 1 it
0
Year, arid p,ro*jcctsIp)cc1*fiiC 111,11mber sor example., 116-436
Enter tile unit titutiber,
Enter the number of bedrooms in'the unlitt
. A #
Enter the square foo:tage for,the ctit:irc wait.
Check iftink xvtws
vacant on,
Decatnibier
3
1, of I 14 equest"
Ing
-%ar. For exaffij)'Ie fi)r tlie
ye,
collection 01`2011
da'(ra, this
would
refer
to December 3
1, 2011
i':aft 11 - Ii0tischolcl C.'0miumtiou
Ing of 1,19 1 it"
S I I 10 11 S,
List #(III mell pants ofille 11111t. Striate c(ach houschold her" rehit ollsh'' 1) to the lica(I o, hotis'ehold by us le orthek follONN11' de f' ti
J I I-1ead of Household S Spouse
A Adult Co-'1WIrarit 0 Other FacIjily Meniber
C Child I Foster cli'llil(l(reii,)/:tti.dti'lt(si)
i`�car�c of tile ortbove
1, Live-in Ciaretoke;- Nit
Da le o 1" 131' rt It
Stticicnt -
Last l"our Digit's of Social Security
Nuutber
1"'.'niter cach 110LISChOld mettiber's date of birth,
i.J Ur nborn, CItildlAtitcpatett
4
Adoir'),tion or 1�ostcr
1 4
*3iticr!"Yes"' if the household is- it ful 1-tinicstude tit or "NO" ifthe houschold
membli I ( It I , (Ieljt*
For cach tenatit, 15 years ofage o,r older, enter the k1st io*tlr digit.s ofthe smicial security
t)
munher or flie 'last f* ur digils of" the allien registratioll HUmbler.'. If the! linst fi),uri (ligits ("A
SSN
6.
fi10 . , 4 81 or aen tvigistratim 1" iss t
n ustul Ing, ctiter:0000,. For: tenants mWer age 15, socii'd Siccurit)
nuniber tiot w(Ittirc-d, 111(hough, pic(asc entei't 0000.,
N, * m tile Ceft*f#Cj(h
If there are tnore than 7 occuparits, use an additional slicelt of paper to fist the remi, 'I'll I'lig 110'1,1-S.Iejiol; Jj'jCIjjl)CrS Jrjtj( '11t*iCII 'i to
2-1-23
is r
See,11111) Ilorinldbook;4350.3 for cot'llipide litistrilletIOTIS 011 Vel iNing 1111d uIC111144111gi 111CO1111c, Includitig Illeceptable, folsil oll"vel I icat" 0
tit , rroil cvwfl incotne ource, enlert'lic grossainoutit trinfiscipated to be received lot" (,lie twelve morili'lls,
1111111 1 r r Ailictition forms
sobtalticd
the th,rd P, tyl veil I
from the cNectivc datc. of the (re)certification, Conipletc a separkite Inie for each itico tile,- earn i ng menrlbers, List cli'vich, respeiiefive lio-useliold member
y rise
licipa iticome oni *!('*(Ioctllllellttltioii:cxists Nicri Ing pending cnrlj�)Ioynient. lfariy adult sta(les zero,-i'llconle,
art
PIC.''
ritimbcr fronil, 11 11. Iiidude and tc( 1Y I
110te "Ziel-VI) iti, the colunitis of Plart Ill,
Coltunii (A) 174.riter !the ttinnual
funioutit,
of`�Nlages, sakur(Cls
#
fips, Co film liss 10 11's.5 botlusles wid other iticotiw f:"ro,n,,i elliploynient
dishibuted
profilk and/or
net incoriie from tri
bus'llie"S'Sio
# '11, 1, "1* Itr_r tililly re ts 'kilt eItco
Columin (B) Entel tilie atintuil telmoullit OTSocial Security, Supplemicittal Security Iticome, pensions) 1 1, it i re Ilic
C'Mill 111,11, (C) Enter the ilui,nuafl atuoutil of inconie reecived ft*olni ubl statice (ix., FANF crial assistatice, d kiiribi I ity)
p C 'Llr,4 S I gei,i
etc,)*
A 111101111t 0 -eigulat-ly
Column (,D) I '.'nt!ctt the #ttlritud a I'a, I is cliild Support, Lin
1, n') 0 11 Y) 1. eniploy ine tit bvriefits, or #any other income I
received by (lie, liousehold,
Row (fill) AcI(i the totia[s froin c(flunitis (A,) iiilrnugh (1)), above. Inter this itliniolifits,
0 I'll p
See UJUD
Usindbooll- 4350.3 folt* c lete nstisluctions on viciiiip'llig andewilculatitig, Income fisont 115sets, including accleptal4le fot,4nis of
N 'r 10141110
,roni Ic thl"Ird Party verification fbi-nis obtauile(I fro1ii eacili, Usset source, list the gross an'lloutit anticipated to be received dur ti: tile t%I 'elve I'notithis
g IN
frout the effiectiNre date of tilic clerti"ficifitlon. If stridi'vAtud Irjotj:SCIlO
Id menilwr illcome is prolvidC(II, list ItIrle I've Illoul is ld member number from
fielspecti SC1,101
I)art If :-ttid compleft a, sept-arrate line for each, member,
Lies, C11CCKIllg fICC101.1,111t SaVr ings acclouti(ii,
Column (F) LIst the typle ofilisset (
a
'o I 1i sh vahl o,fthe petwe asset,
At 13
F'nter (lie ct
j,eIpat.C1(j #41mima incotri. r i ilgis acclount
1 ( ix, savu
0 h.1111,11 nter the arill c I" on the Otsset balarice i'liultipned by :tile ituinuall,
interest �ra)
,
#
TOTAILAS Add the toii of C'o1urtin (1--I) to-ind Column(1), respectively,
0I)s
the gwaters of dietotal ire C'alrrr��rr
l�n��� (Al w (J)
Roul (L), 7 01(j/ hrunare I%t•01pr a// Sotrr°ce.s
,4(1(1 (E) (nid (K) awelit eidetm the total
0
Determination of Income Eli'gibilitj
'I"Ottil Arinutell Household Iticome froill [4iter the numberfroin item (L).
a-11 Sources
11114
RMI_ F MIR 31
I KAI
# A N # , 0 # ll*( 11r, I # lilliplills,
I e 110 tit S e Il of (I is I' Z.e S 11C I t I C I
Current Bond Incoille Ij :111 C
t )1er- Fanil"Ily Enter the Curretit ii.,iost resti'llictiNte kilove 11 111colille 1-.11 1 0 Ily,
ize tile 111tirix 111"Conle 111,1111t 1"11COI ortitiiig both fied,cral aild fit p
o
snie iii t '11, ore rer
1 cst,*1te stitices n1st-ict v
statidarlds iris reflected, in the 50% or 60%set kle (Ireltafled Ill tile s . lid Rubl r .
Agreetniciits,
5 C YCOAC "Yetiun'thicome Certiticati,on (May 2018)
r
Il t
Y"I
is is 4 lousehold Itime tit movemm, o r r1c, ce rt i i i c a 1, 1 n s o Ill p I 111CM ff) tile 11!10N?cq* t I co . 1"titer flic housichok -
lie r) oItl CC[* I I (ItI
co0110
Household SSize at Move -ill EiAct", the number of" liotischold luembers firom the tnoVe-ili cerliticatf011.
r
# 0 1, or, rec t ations, I f
1'ecideral 1,11 -FIT" h1conlic Litillit X ert * fic only. Nwhiltiply tile currei,it L111TC N1 axi:11,111 I'll I 11C011 I i
N40vc-,*n I I c 1,
1400/o 1, 40% and enter the totaL 140% 'I'I (] on title Fedcr.al Set -Aside of* 20/50 of. 40/601 t*VS
t)p� :if 0 Clat#gIctilig clectimis o *,30"lo, 4100/o, 145..'Xio
clectc;'d by tile, ONvillicim, It"ll tile prilloperill" t dic c 1) ci
50
s lill,
Ithat tota''lit t 10/o, letc, Below, incucate whetherthe houschold ITIC01i'lle cXCcc(; IL If t'i e Gro s s
"t,per huu*ly
Auumal hicofiietat relicertificim"on is greater tivin 140% of the 1,1111"C' hicom.el,fitil, I
S#ZC fit i\,IoVrC_*Il
i date (above), then (lie avil]
t flable t rule tnust be 1`611owed.
0
onie I
Unit Nlects, 10'ederfil ItIc tcstrictiot,i
Check
1
the appropri atic box for
# ill # $;
tr cl On 11,trit the housel
tile m,colme res i t: It .1old filects accordifig to
at
what 'i's
required by thic flederal
set-aside(s ror theP11,01clict.
t J11 Nfects Dccl)cr "I" I ng 111,collic jr 11* 4 1 .0 1
if rge t i yo#ur agellcy rc(Plircs oil mc(�)mc restriction IoNver thati the FcdcrIal limit, entelt"the plercent
0 .0
Restrictioti rcquirccl,
WMWA
"I"enant Paid Monthly Rent F"Pnitertile amounit tile tcnant pays towil I ret'it (flot ific,111ditly refit ass st,"Allce RCRY[nerlits sticil a
1
Seettoll 8),
1"ederal Rent Assist"t'll"Ice I pliter' tile tolmount of retilt assisttivice received Froni it f�derid
program
t recei ved', if tsiny.
4 , 4 -,al ricitt assl"stancle
Non.4'ederal Rent Assi'StarflC(! ter tile amount of noti edei
"I"Otal k1otithIly Rent Assisttat;fcc I '.'Wer the al111011t)( Of lto(ral retit assistance irceellircd) irattly.
=m IMMM 1�
MEN
r IVU -NEW
(pi°oSSNIonthIy Rent fc�r [iraIt Enter t���: total f IC ant I'uid Refit f)[Us Ciiility All
oNvance arid other tioii-optional chargcs,
Ojr" ir�clti�eThe totalmayN amounts other than ".1"criant. Paid Rent, Lhitity Allowances atid
ottier tillort-optiottal charges. If) accordanclic Nvith the defiriition of Gross Rent *if IRC
§r#21(g)(?}(B}, it, may not ii,chie any rent assistance amount.,
amolunt must, be thel tivaxl'
mit fi r the unit, 'miS, t 114111111
Maximill-11 1,11-11"IC 131oluiRcilt Lit'llit fl'o'r 11"oInt.cr Ow i'mixi 111:1 [fit allowable groliss 0
Micall -
S I 11, 111 amourtit alloNved by the Current Incou-ic I AnIllt per, I'arLmLly Size -"- Speel Yit 11 e M ar sx, re n
# 0 a
uncorportating both federal, atid M 811101"lle I 1111stiances More,restricti've, statle statidar(Is as reflected
0
itl the 50% of-- 60% set asi'de, detailed 'in the Hon(I Regulatory greement.
I
Utut Meets FedcqtrlIRlient Restriction at ludiciate the a late rent restri I
(I ppropr ction, that t1te unit tueets: accorldirig to w1loeit iss remitired
the federiil set-asidie(s) .1"i the project,
ilnit0 0 al (lie appropriatercilt, rest ric tiso if that clic unit mects, according to what 'i's lr�iqturcd by
the feders1l alld static law for the project,
Unit Meets Deeperlargetihig Rent Irf your age'licy requires 1:a rcilt res tri c (ion IoNver thati 'tile fcdcral lilmit, lenrter (Iler per,ccnt
Res(ricUion, at required.
I'ut•t 1,114 . Student Stittrfti
a
It all 11011schold fincillbers tire rull time studellUs check "Yes"'. Full th''lle StIARIS is deternvined by the school tile studetit ittletids, frat It..'sinst orlic
household 1111'rel:111DIcir Isfiot it elleck "flo.
4 1
10,11 ITI I d hl the box to t h -is appl3p,
It yells, JS checked tit(,* appropHatie excitipt" ust: 11,30 1 ste I I I i c rl g 101
1hioticol'thellexempt' tile housichold, is Iticligil'Acto
refit the t1111141
,� C"'CAC Ten'a'Iit ltzcolll'e :Ccrti�licatinr,i (May 2018)
2,,11-25
13
Pa r t V1 I I "- Progr,a m Type
"I'taxCredit See Part V above,
11�!WVJL ffl�l
Tax Exempt If the property- pitir"
tic pates,in (he Tax Exienilpt Biond prograti-1; 11,iiark tile aj)propriatc, box itidiciating the 1110,11schold's de
signaltion,
Bond
11309111 ill
NJ 113 1, 1 1 * 11i IN I I i gill
Im"Xiiii IMIN, Z ml
Othei• Ifthe property partici�ai�� unatiy other aftrdable- l)at�sit�� prograi,11,, C'(,.miiiiiplete the'Information asapproprutatile,
sIc,Nn"ruiiE 0,11 oNVNElt/RGPRCtiGNTA'fIVL
EM 11I fam alia I I 111121212,11 H MR] A WMITA W1,111 ft Imlik FMWTM, I W rMVT7TM �llW MmMFZVMW WWMVM%N%%
r 0
Complete thi's por toll
iOji# cerl?flcaflon),
11 171
IFE m 1, =,nm
11misn S11
Res idle nt/Apip 11 can, t Initi-afis All. tenantsk %Nvho wish n(,)t to 1 lemental Should I th*
imormatian inata is section.
Paretit/Guardia-ti P1111tlyr Complete mid 1,111tial for minor clu"Id(reti),
C111111t II]COIri'le
C,,`rFCAC "J"r Certificatioti (May 2018)
W�z 0
A TACHMENT 3
f,
'FROM*
REV'IEWE,Dl iYI
0 9
Planni*ng Commission
Aaron Holll*st,er, annier
Illeather'Hinles, a a f ! er
#I ProjectDeCrl*.sto MMulti-family
Mitigated Negative Declaration
Residential, Density Bonus and Development Concession/Incentive
'91
Site Pl,an and Archi#tectural Rev,I*ew
EII,I,S.�itreet
"Ft• -DT l.eit . --,SR,, 18:-003*
— 11— bi,.r 1111,1 ..— I wlh - I �"I'll I 1 11 1 �,Ull":t-Illl. - I'll 1111:U1 — il ; , ,
-tell1111 1111 1111
am,i y roj ect.,
P/Iult�x A, F
I
WORM
1111.
IF -I M, py'' MW1003 flirv) tin
the subjec't property include two-story multi'-famil,Y resi'de,
0.
lal-11 to the north and south, and
Veh1*CUr1aj
ro !::ec,t si
�1 51MMILM, ILM-1106
-I L
jjjjjjl��1111i� Wiff
access 'to 'the si"te lips provie via, an e Ir ngr curb Crut on t
a -
e:� s frontage on E111*s Street. A gravel driveway provides tor
e so ut I er y porti.on ot the
Veh- cular: circulation on he
majori Y
trees. The
V 'I
Project
General Plan Sub Area
Payran-McKinley Subarea ;of the Petaluma :General Plan,
The project site IS located within the
Boc•dered by Highway, 101, the railroad tracks., Lakeville Street, and East Washington Street, the
Payran-McKinley subarea consists primarily of residential uses and a few large vacant parcels,
primarily adjacent to the Petaluma River, Lynch and Washington Creeks, and Highway 1,01. It
features a diverse range Of housing
densities, with s : dwellings, townhomes
%,Ot rt r1*
Fi*gure 1 Proj* el%'11 Loca ion
apartments, and seni*or, housi"n,g opiti*
'Fill- n -I
0 0 m 0
terraces Wi neiE.
we an corri ors.
5 MWAR
194 1 L J-MWM RX I =Z -4 -IM
convey watet t"easi ble, the icre tion, ot ttooA-
as provide habi'lat restorati'on protection of remnant
For the Payran,-McK.I*nley Subarea, the Gene
maintain and develop the area wl*th a diverse
c'haracter of this ,n neignoor, oold wh
ral Plan lestabli'shes Goa2-*G�6 w I -C states,
range of resi'dentia ensi ies appropri.ate to e
'Ie enhanci*ng the creek corrldors,."
Land Use Mampw-,L
Figul4e 2 Pay,ran. C in ey NU
ESN
A 4 a,
=WAK HIS
3-3
3
q
� , 7
ase
le 0 0" m m -wna
ri"ure .i,. ift-I LuAruw[lld Use tion
. tien,ers-11 'Y'luji-lL Desio
9 9
4WD
FM
condi'ti*ona
The FF u overlay requires al.l. new princu"
illl,eVc ,ODMe 't Derml'*t rior to commencement of the use., 'in, at
0
I
c
11
m
The pro,posed UeCristo Mult;le,--
F 6 0
ure:4: Zoning Map
IV
L,yam P
o.019, 1411
�trontagel
.2
an! Arch I"tectural Rev i*ew and a Dens,l'ty it's onus has beenrequest.
of 1,8,,143 unit
deve, opment
179
dinas will have si'm,lar dimensions with bui*ldi"ng foot,prini
IG
14*ne and a setback,the southerly propetIty
line. The vehi*culax access/ci"rcul,ah"on
Il*ne at e:.
,---
-10
propert-tir ine,
.y
Figure 5: Si*-te Pilau
circulation provi ed viaa two-way, driveway
r ve Icular ci-rculation on e
A t:
OA OaO 2zons . itle vehl*cle pa i_ng, s,paceis would
of permeable pavj*n.g,.
Elevations/Materials
theosed bubuildings will largely be'the same with theThe designs of the upper two storl*es of
exception of paint color. The !facades, of the upper stories are proposed to be largely composed of
Ah .9 5
smooth -troweled stucco and glazing with horizontal metal panel bands, Angled Day windows are
ions o
proposed in the, ccenterportf t
he north and south bui'ldi'ng elevati*ons. The east and
..... ..... . . . . . . . . .E.
tectural forms
arc i
Il*ne at the to; of the facades.
.n the center of the bm
acting elevati'ons located above the couil'yard entry. Th -,,i
0 'h buI*Idinr',,' are
The courtyar en.... ries to leac 9
ower stories wn' la. be fin i*s.: . ied w
01 the, fron
i it
v -v 11
hr Lr
g ii
AW
The garage
IN 11 16
,vigure Front Eleva
K�1
Filb,gure 7* Rear Elevati*:on (Bul"Id1*117111- C)
is 9�&
C:7
Fi*gure 8:9 North,Facing El,:evatI'*O'HS
7i'
F,I:*gure 9: South -Facing Elevati'Ons,
im
m
di
wi
and vmes. Trees:an..nds:�ca g
ard eas between the buildings,
N
M
Q
111KOD 00
MR1 or"M*byy
most building (page L4 of Attachment E for details). All six existing trees on the property are
proposed for removal. One of the trees is already dead and none of the existing trees are protected
'trees per the IZO.
In th-, e area -1
Outdoor a,meni*b`es include, an in -ground pool and,
I *
ow,,fthe (I"te actiacent to t le eastern-m,ost bui*ldi*n
incluctincy biench seating.
b
,'an o �er c,om.mon--*usag!e out,door,spaces,
lounge area located t
Q'I
0-44
Standards of v w
This proje%,l is subject to -tble fol,lowi*,ng standards of re,vi*e,W.*
'Use land efficiently by promoting infilldevelopment, at equal or higher
density and intensity than surrounding uses.
P
e 71*0VI e a
i ne a R m
osed pipol'eci cons,7SIS �elopnien at, TV011
I ====11IIIIINIMININ
PS
r All hi� than sizu4i oundin
0 t and intensi
P1,40J ! ect tliat I*
o -oses t4lestae'nual inIIIAent that
F
MM
Fill
I IF
Aesi w aenti.`al. (8. 1
the d-lvve11i*nfl61 zmit
to all.
4
18. 0 un7"tslacre) as iiilivell as a Reslldenli .*s
to 18.43 uni't.slacrel. I
low a s V it i*nci'llilease
-9-11
-,M,cK'1'*n1eY
Chal ter 2 0 n
Po11*cY Gvm,3
in e dens1',1tjillllll�
i,verse
aintain and, deve'lop the area with a
appropriate to the character of th,is centra
enhaincin le cree. coiTi::: ors.
rrni -IL
Cha ter 46, 1 ne atural Envi"romnent
range of resi"denti'al densi its
borhood wh*le
ur an n1eign
I ra I
MIZE
Tr! JV116 M
Ir
ii
4 -P -i
PoticySC Create setbacks for all tributaries to the Petaluma River extending a
minimum of50 feet, outward from the top of each bank. Development shall
not occur within this setback, except as pail of greenway enhancement (for
3-110
5 Mob 1"li. y
*..h,,apter
Po'II*Cy 5'-.P:-26
examp;Ie, trai*ls, and, bl*kewa,ys).
Washingtof� top of bank
setback fiwin the
A, SO foot
�noi�ld not occin•
estcrblishecl ill, iiihich f�e�? co��sh�zretion
landscaping and a pedestrian trail.
C1,e and Pedestrl*an P'lai
-.-
land that i*s
quiring, new ci,ty entiti
,Ke uire:aii new development and those re,
"frontage," along creek,,s and the river to per -i -nit th,rough travel
*th acicess pol*nts from parallel thcorri".dors spaced at e river wi
,ntervals of'500-11000 feet.
nTage.
Chqpter I I Housi'm El.qlment,
a qW I&MIN
1901
1, itnot4e tne pi ect Tt�iu ptoi,�,iae
P, wtv
V I f
in, close pr,oxI*1nitj) (.
A,
Encourage the development of housing on underutilized
appropriately zoned..
has been!
,e...XI.ce t fol"If
P
IN jdeemed N1019and
Tli,e subect project was cprior to Jrn�uary
therefore to the toeceiitlj� modified1*ncIttsi*onat4j)housing
is foot sa�bject
I�ozrsii�g i * /,I liezrjre,es. The pt�oject sloes pr4ovi�le one
o��dif�nnce or if�crecrsecl
adjacent to
hvo-bedroom unit, that be to a hozrsehold at the vee}) loii�
the bonits ao,4eeiiien,t.
i7icoii7e I.ei7el, pei,o requesteddej�sit��
0
91
Implementing
ZI N fE
g Ordi*nance
Development, Standards
As described below in Table I the proposal complies with
Multi -family residential is an allowed use in the R4 Gone.
development standards of the I,ZO.
ize business
"!r' weii as minim
the over1a) requi"res elevation of the I
Ina%
o
I
:
100% levels of fordable hous,.in
[jrOvId1*41-41, or ceftain
rescr,ibed numbee
r: olf dvelopm
a e,
0
in a development
C
incentive/conclession as ollows.
Con cess1*011 01 4
f*
concessions cis
* v e Ik
SII,Ib&i,7ision.c37 (a)
I*r 0
Incentive, Used
IP W
specgied in
* ncl�z
c,uid (h) i i
t incentives or
9
,intej,$CLhangeilk
bI,,, n,7e,ans"
J^
Cal yaoton7a Goverwrnent Code
ding, but not limiter' to, tlie
,a
is ell"gl*ble to
suc i i4egit ar. oi)�
Section 6591 5
toe''CIII ct'l"O III Si tI
Sc
91Ats ,4ect inancicil as'si t ince
S ( zoning code toequii einen, j
A& W-
otliei 4 Tvgul,atol
i,,,qeduct7*OIIS tlicit
-1 4,
this c laplet-l-
. L M131
entities devel Aft
i ing area
reduced mt*nimum outdoor an /or private, ou Mor I*v"
reduced on-si"t
16 increased maximum ot coverage
!2
I
Y.
a
icuor stories
e ar,ki*ng standards., t*nc,,Iudi'ng
•
3-13
mom,
The , roje
o
1.
NlafA
t of the base number of unl',ts (12 uni*ts) allowed by the
evel an amount eua,l to el*,g'nt percen
zoning/land use designation .:. � e project site, he
require a Ian, amendment,
J01% 0 A I
i0mia state
0
ow income
nt
pp, icant as the dievelopme
vp
tothle proj*ect.
Ek.A
,rK7iLKsI.Y.7[�Iil
inclusi
on of t
he onwwsi*te very affordaWe uiiit
-Y,
ti*vle and a resi* entl*al densit
ti*o'n has been sought by t
aDie 2 summarizYom„
s,how ChasI II
...... .. .. . W� ------
2 ItESIDENTiAL DEN
B
SITY oNus, SUMMARY
tionStandard Proect Deser J6
..... .... . ...
. .... . . ....... ...
...... ..... .... . .....
Base Project SizeThe num er o units ro ose in e
(Number 12
of Units) project Prior to receiving an eligible
density bonus __
r oj, e ict
in he numberof units the base
Affordable Units Proposed
(VeryLow)that shall be dedicated for the requited
', term pursuant to CA Government Code
'� ' §,6,5915(c) to very low-income
-d 4M 4: (i.e.
househoIds those earning up to 50%
Me ianof the AseaIncome Level as,
(published and periodically updated by
the CDepartment of Housing and
Urban Development) _ _
B
Amount of Density Bonus 27.5% The amount of density bonus, calculated
Available marketli
(3 rate DB , o CA Government Code
units allowed; 1 §65915 and IZO, ich for the applicant
j � market -rate DB is eligible.
unit proposed)
__
.......... .
,
Available 1 The number of incentives/concessions
project iseligible.
for! which the
Incentives/Concessions:
1 Reduced equal to three parking
Ehgie Parking Ratio
I $dam
ace/unit spaces has been, requested by the
.... .... . .... ..
;applicant, which would reduce the
required off-street vehicular• parking
2 Bdrmpaces/unit:
requirement for the project from 25 to 22
s aces.
I now
Supporting information for
e projec inclu es a request for the folling
requestedIncenIncentives/Concessions that result 'inictentifiable and actual
for affordable housing costs:Cost reductions to!provide
Incentives/Concessions
OF
Reduce. total vehicular• parking spacerequirement
I � from 25
totals aces to 22total spaces.
. . . ....... .... .. . ... . ........ ........ ..
3-14,
-IN
nciucie Dut is not., m
i)Tcession, or incentive am.
how 'the cos
it 7z
tn ac,hieved, tluou
reducti'on a,llows the applicant to provide e
3-15
W -K OW -WIN -M W, -IL7-FA-W IL IJL- � I I'll "I
TI Jlim:-A .
I -
is
units proposed
in the t ""'hie ro
d
F 'beroom uni"t pposed, on
,proj V,41 I
11 S11
ni
84 'I not be the affordable u't.
e grou,nd floor of Building B
FI
li
r �F � . I
I I
I.
F�k
�� ISI
I, I
HI
IF% I 011"N 0 9 1 i Is
lt� anning uommtssi.on s consill, eratt*on
SI*te Plan and Arch 1*.tectural Revi*ew
0 f-" 0
nnmission shall makle the specilic
T -he Plai*n,g Com *
m 1& f R,iee Ap ions),
with IZO:'2 0010 (Stan ards o vt wcat
V
to approve t e r ec, in comrr ance
P
.: e�d
Staffrecommen.dabons are rovi '
� I
Ar
08- 1 it
FI
e
consi er re ormal SPAR consideration. The foll
0 0
Planni"ng U'ommi.sston to, consider as -v%art afthei*f feedback,
0
owing are staff suggest'i"ons for the
Ia
rem
I I
• , i -he middle (Bit flidi*ng B), exploreeRelated to the design of the, '40111ld-, 014 unit n t
enhanced pi•il1acy solz1tions acrd desigJi solutions that would indicate tl7e rn•ea is
.
r�eside»tral dN�ellif�g ar�rit.
laf�dscapedfi-*iont setback
• The pi*oject -'s bac oti>> pi,4evente,to and metes ate propasec� ifs a
area. Ideally, these featarres should be located ifs an area screened,fi4om the public f•ight-
of
ia, building alcol)e ot- recessed area on a secondary fivontage that
Consider alter•��ati>>e locall"onsfol,4 this eqziiptnent to bettet4
niinin-,nzes their ea ance,
screen it fi4on7 pedesh•ian vie�a�.
o Staffhas concetons regarding! tl�ie glatse andrefl.'ectivitj) oftlie Pi Oposedn7etalpanel. niatei10?11 0 14 i'AS of LUCOIL wl"t1i Chainpaign micaa IIIIS/11,), thais pi,opose- on the exterolthe zrpper
levels of the barildings. When >>ievved inszrnlight,the materialthe appeatw to give off glrn*e
does
nand inya beoverly toe ective., Constaeto uti,tizin"fig anish that i�s nn-woi,efl.ectlfffi>e and ot
pr•odzrce glnre.:
MIN
niid projecti»g bay wificloi-vs could feat-1/re a cliffei�efit Tiiater•ial that provides >>iszral
ejl1ia»cernent ana cliffer'viitiatiofi.
Commission's
To guide the Planning
IN
following outlines the r
project. Staff
recommends thatthe Planning Commission provide the applicant feedback to
1A A
initial consi"deration of SPAR for'- the roiect,., the
address in SPAR pians to approval Council'safter the consideration of the
flow EO)WHENT"VIRMOIN Moll ILI"
INICIIIIINIK"111 MHUMf
M
L
and bl*CYCIW parking fa.ci*li*ti
and conveni'ence, and sball
,PUB.LIC 1COMMENT
d
IV'Fs S go promote safe,t
es anped- estrian waly 1 hall be desi* n eldr as t
If i
conform to approved City standar-s.
3-17
,A.Draft Ini*ti'al Study was prepare .
on March 19,,201,9.
an.1d,p
d I I ostew*th Cal'
t I 11tN IAICt
in compliance with the Cali*fornia, Envi*ronmen, I
.at ua
Im"rifffflo 064 MIS MIMI imam
would be, mitigat,ed to a I
r -T -I
E
k WAI VAL 0 W k 2
HL 15 -
in the pt•oject's Mitigation Monitoring and Repotting Program, Attachment A Ext►ibit I contains
r
the Initial Studyand Declaration, as well as the proposedMitigation
If Monitoring andReporting Program,,
-A. Resolution Recommending Adoption of MND to City Council
I IS/MND/MMRP
Exhibit
B. Resolution Recommending Approval of DBonus Housing Agreement
HousingAgreementEexhibit I DensityBonus
C. Outreach Meeting from
D. Public Comment
E:. Project Plans reduced an full size)
H
A C
TTA HmE,NT 4
JR -F lk'
� LN 4�'
ANN&1 -13 1 Tow
"ALK.st
AP'N-** 00`/lm,361 =003
FILIE NO,, PLSwKftlm,18mv0a'.,"
i
a JIII 0 0
ifh Flood P-flain-,-(.�ombinine-si
Y
(t'he "Project"), and
% 0 F
WHEREAS, the Project is subject to the Petaluma General Plan 2025,, adopted by the
City on, May 19, 2008; and
LW
0 r
ConsideraTions tor signiTicanf impacts that
a be
could not e avoided; and
IT ao 110W.
a
WEER W WIN& R"
Page 1
Planning uammiss on Resolution No. 2C�19-05
against
these thresholds provides a conservative assessment as the basis for a determination of
:S I IgnITICance; and
AA11
t does not make a
elcause of f he
rence,, are
ne custodian of the documents and other maf erials w'hich
-AW --
igia
im*-%ac s. a I si nITIcanf pac s!are!m*t* ted f o a less t
p
M11H
ma A
a. The Project is consistent with the General Plan 2025: Medium Density Residential land use
designation in that the Medium Dens*ty ResideResidential provides for a varleY of dwelling fypes,
including
sand multi -family housing at a density of 8.1 to 18.0 units/acre.
report,b,, The Proj*eCT I'S,, for the r1easons d" d n fhe March 27, 2018 PlanningCommission staff
ing Plan Policy 1-P-2 (Efficienf, Land Use),, Policy I -P-6
Consistent walth the follow" General
(Encourage Mixed -Use Development), Goal 2-G-3 (Payran-McKinley Neighborhood Character),
,
Policy 4-P-1.0 (Creek Setbacks, Policy 5-P-15 (Bikeway Implementation), Policy 5-P-26 (
les
Access), and :�Housing Element oifici1.1 (Encourage: Residential Development), 1.2 (Optimize
Development Potential), and 4.2, (Affordable Housing Production).
C The Project is consistent with all development standards of the Residential 4 (R4) zoning district,
including but not limited to, those pertaining to uses, setbacks, building height, floor area ratio,
and parking,
'Ma W,111k 'Apoklirm
Planning Commissian Resolution No. 201 9-05 Page 2
r%
%
Liased ut #� , if S re�vie!w
he entire recor erein
a
nclucina the MND, Tne In'itia' Sfudv, all su orfin
celived,the Planning Commission finds
Cr,om:ments 0 1
—0
MAP oil,
011, MIMZIrQ Im"I'M
a rw] I I , I m I a to] LOR
reference, are civai'llable 'for review in t! e city
City Hall, duringE I
business
ISO
-low
It lw
Y
2025 EIR, and all documents *incorporated herel*n
i
Community Developmenf Delpartmen:f at Petalum�o-
i
16 1':1rocmJUM.ro oseci ec, is itne CityOT reTa a (.�Iommuni,,Lly ueveiopmenT' uepa
luma 94952#
9
0
anning ITI
t go
is,sion hereby
Declarati epared for fhe Proj*e?C---.*t,
Planning Commission
w
ndS thaf the C'I*ty Clounc'il adopfs the M'Ifigated
Resolution No. 2019-05
o,
t
rtment, 11 Engli'sh Sf
I
0
ADOPTED thols 91h day of April, 2019, by the f6llowwing vote,
Commiss*ion Member Aye No
..............
Councilmember x
r
McDonnell
Heather Hines, (,.�ommission Secretary
.,,.w.,.,.,., „m.« r.ii,i . . .. ..... ..... ...... . . . . . ...... ... . . ...... ...... . ...
Riichard Marzo,, Chair
Lisa Tennenbaum., Assistant Clity A,ttorney
Nanning Commission Resolution No. 2019-05
I
I
m
Absent
.,,.w.,.,.,., „m.« r.ii,i . . .. ..... ..... ...... . . . . . ...... ... . . ...... ...... . ...
Riichard Marzo,, Chair
Lisa Tennenbaum., Assistant Clity A,ttorney
Nanning Commission Resolution No. 2019-05
I
I
m
'Ikk
--E, TI
Nis
NNW
: IM
A, �H
iATT
I a -*r4 a c; -41at,iv�e Dec u u ion
G s wr x � � �
_ E �.
, E
IU
#--�jde-%vNtiUjP%L1 I U U i i, Nee I\ANu
i Nape
DensityBonus and a Development Concession/Incentive on April 9, 2019, at which time all
interested parties had the opportunity to be heard; and
11 11 'IMF
very, low income household; and
MW
Cr
WHEREAS,, cons'I'stent! w"ith 1,1.kIJ Se tion 27,,040.D
to a very low e house:hold as part of the subjeo
I—
*t,y bonus of up
,@�ensl
rM MR1 I �6 11597, LIS 0 LO 1, 1
the i"Incluision o f one on -,site un*It affordable
f r
8,,0 units, per acre* and
I
t above the base maximium len,si Y Ot,
o 27.5 perce,n d t
1�
WHEREAS,, IZO Section
ILA
27,070 further proviffices that the City may grant: a waiv,
& 1P I I a 116
-5 101
ML
M-- 111111M I Ato 150 1 its
numuer o spaces; an
I
IM 0 a, -"-
MOPS 1,
WHEREAS, f he reduction 'in the required ons'Ite parking
W Ic urther subsidizes the provision o, Iihe unIT avaiiaole to t
I
not contrary to state or federal law-* and
I
ff Ar 9
acre; and
WHEREAS, Chapter 27.090 provides the requirements for a Density Bonus Housing
Agreement, which have been incorporated into the draft Density Bonus Housing Agreement for the
project.
'Planning Commission Resolution No. 2019:-06
a
3Ru ats ., x:. , , .. a, a ^-.m.„: ..,.1,,.
AW- M
Ic WE
IL
Plo ICY 45 -F-26 i(��reeK r*11
M *kewa
Bi m lementation
t Potential.1, anC 4.2 (AtTOraatDie
c. The Project is consistent with all development standards, of the Residential 4 (R4) zoning district,
including but not, limited to, those Pertaining to uses,, setbacks, building height, floor area ratio,
and parking.
d. The Project is consistent with alI requirements for a Density Bonus with a Concession as out:,: Pined in
IbonusIZO Chapter 27:(lResidenTial Dens'I'ty, Bonus) and California sfate dens'fy law,
ssion staff
eferenced, and 'incorporated documentsand all
A reemen::r a, aci i,e as Lxnioif 7
L..”
tierefo andincorporafed here'in by reference.
-0
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2019 1
I I k'X"-
ADOPTED th'is Yth u----la,y of April, 2:019', by the follow'ing vote:
Gomez
Streeter
olpert
Heather Hines, Commission Secretary
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2019-06
MIM
44
From.
ja
0
Cc;
SubjIlec,.
A
Jerr : Y Kier �<je (,jerry -45 PM
T'huirsda , February 21, �2019 120
Y
H,ea,ther Hines, Aaron Holhister
rows -
1:09 Ellis Outreach, Meeting
I
MM,
0
Meefling Hosted By: Jerry I(Ier Arichi tects
g Dery partment �Re,prelsentation,.
pl,anninm.
:N
..m0*A,CHM
v"ew"ng. The boards*ncluded site plans,
m_®
One neighbor was only concerned about the drainage and grading but the majority of comments were on: traffic as, well
as concerns that man* Y 'I apartments were overpopulated.
We had an interesting and 'lengthy conversation w
nit
Al en of Urban Com,mu *12Y Partners Op AdIdition
and drop -o; f times and the concern, about parking
ith Kevin McDonnell,, the vice -mayor of Petaluma as well as Dave
Ily, the principal of McKinley school had a conversation about pick-up
There was appreciation from a number of attendees for t
p solar panels.
veh*lcle charging stations and the roofto!
IM
he Nke, stroragein each building as well as both theellectriu
Beyond that, there were no other issues that were brought to us. We are looking forward to and hoping , or a SPAR
meeting date, as soon as feasible.
Sincerely,
OR
ff I
Jerry Kier
JEWR�RY IIKLER
lit
A R
PI-ANNIN(3
� �izr;ci i�t�r
IF: 6F:FiI01,-; 0 L $4 G N
JERRY I<LER, A, I I A,,
4176 GATE SROAD SIJO
ggU4u,UTt3 CA91uG5
633'
0 Yok ,
SAUSALITO CA 04905
P[�JQINE 415 332,iMils"R.
14
F: wZ;14
RRYKII, �RAFI(A il tf CTS
61",
E
rAREW"m
LM rR
141
To*
Su bi e ct
karen maccall <yazl<ar:el @comcastnet>
,Monday, M,archze-%.,&rS, 20119 12*,119 PM
9
petalum-atvpNianin:ing@c'i.pe'taluma.,ca.us; Aaron Hollister
PN* 1007-131�61-003 109 E11*11S St Petaluma, Ca 9495,2
3RTAW
AIT i Au M N, 7
11111111!�� ML OIL, SOL OIL -
FIM
7
I AF -4
,,,planing environmental commission) nave tean at
no Park'i' on t e area. I don't, know if you ,al
Ellis St
Iwo
terri e par ing is in is arealls i n a
I
V
183 Pavtowran St Petaluma Ca9,49�52
j
7072356972
P.S. youSz If'need to use my name on the council meeting is: ok, or you can just say resident of Paryan
,,.
St near the Intersection of Washington St.,
11
10
In
City of Peta'luarna lanning Comm'Ission,
March 18-2019
have concerns about the proposed 3, story apartment complex with 13 2 bedroom units at
109 Ellis St. (applicant: Don DeCristo Family Trust, File No. PLSR-18-0030)
EML
Ml�'Tfi , a
F
A Fj ff pop 1 0 M�I N , "241
1004116ME
M
U
LAm
ese
F
�,,borhood is for mult*lple familito 'Inhabit one apar
streets wit nin a milld
3 units. The norm in
and multiple single
!'Y
ro ose a r: s a: c ve
F'. e: s
g,
.,i nIic, les, Fe here are on v z
a
of those, attendees mus,
0
es,i ents are g over
Y
t park 2 arni'le away from t, e sc 0011
111.
4 M !# 41 01 6
practice, it i
W IMMLL
its but
Ily
FIRM
Respectfully,
AM,
dim
rigWR 'S
420, MkIIIIII 4�110 ro o -A
AIR
q
qK
a A Wr 111W&W.W1, 111M, "W�
U 11 Ma MITM 9,
resources, The discussion states tha'i lian
r
Ining a prepilstol .1
nossil)1lity 01 conta
d reh'Istionic farChaeollogica actual 1, recordei.
P
t II
hM a o ct^ to ark.. dic; uyiu
resi,ourcei,,-�
1, sli*tes w*1th'In the C'I'ty are, in p "...ox'I'mity to a
M
T
t S11116L A ff UR,
NWe
"
con"isf archaeological resources ons► e
cl
(
'p. 28).
a
his
The Northwest Information Center is an affiliate of the State Office of Historic Preservation and is the
State's official
ffIcial repository for cultural resource, site records for Sonoma County.
K yister
Tor l'ist ng in the ual'I'forn'a "e,
'for list*ing in the CRHR.
M
ing
do nolt concur w'l'th the H RE f nd
ell' resource as 'the conclus:ior
orica,
T�t
WIFE 0 =WAN
III SE411AME1 000111111,111, 1 Fit 11=21LUI I'mm W, W,
' EQA
I ITy as a, u
that the tankhouse dolies.. not ua EO
o cietermine i 'hi al r
ts status as a storic
I
111ty for l'isting in e:CRHRE
En.s: o u rice a n d e: g 'I
P,--.r,g-t,u,re is available t,,hrouqh onl'ine sourc: and at I
i
io,us tankhouse stud:i'es: u ration of, prevE
con:sill e
ex i for, evalua�tionf
the h'istor'llca'l coni e
ocal librar'ies., Reference to, and
w I J-1 H'i
Ell
� MW 7`IIA
A MML
1 Pitman, Leon S. 1976, Domestic Tankhouses of Rural California. PioneerAmerica 8(2):84-97.
2Pitman, Leon SF,,1992. The DomesticPi-rioNinkhouse as Vernacular Archwitecture in,, Rural California. Material
Culture 24(1):13-32.
revision, be required (CEQA
: a substantial
recirculated—or, a Focused EIR preparecE--should
Guidelines Section 15073.5).
Re,s-ourices
M,itigation of lf-ii,pa cts, ito H*storic
Places.'
I oil III
U1112 I MA�
2 1 #TAT fri OFELff I
lmwl.� lie Am 0
eothe flong ir tanAhous�t,,u ano,t'her sultabl ffoms "t
ee lo�cat
MEMO -
01
-olects?*d-63
hall US le -1
/current 11 d e v: oom e t
!h t�t DS /,/ww,w,. red wood cli ,or
'1-
It
W
IM1,0116114my nw Lvayrasitz t;Km,
a
I i t I �q t r i i P. t�vnv"i e act=nt medium-dens'l't. ments a "%map
ilinas were con
11
roug I nt managemer,-
t were not a concern to i
dsca P*-%iing andlor other': recreati"
#nai reatures tor, resident,4
Is
i M: � 1, I,Moth,y ones
Tw'ln Cre:eks C'I'rcle, Petaluma
1 e.htm:l
"w c
e t al, ul e t
11 n d, rej)ort-water-wast
h tt C itv Of �:p
a
Aaron Holll*st�er
,eIectr'i'cl�lonn�ie@att.net
Sd AM
Wedne ay, Ap ri 3, 2:0 19 6,6
0
iivia Ervin,* Aaron Holl*ster
109 Ellis Street Multi -Family Project
via Ervin,, Pr r incipal Planner & Aaron Holli, ster, �)enior' Planner
C
low�1 I*ve in, the area of the site pro; ect. With hope and anticipation tor medium, low and very income units being
Planned I express my support.
adision Street.
r Project Description; My only concernCirclet, Ellis Street and
, is In the area of Martin
gi � pi I v� Mw'"Ame
MI " I
IM JBINVA, i R MWOWWA USEMAW
4W
low
"W AWIR 0 IL� MA
mad
consider the 25 spaces ov%...
Lonnioe Olaeta
136 BurlingtonDrivIt
Pletaluma., CA:949S2
Jllllllllllllllli
4lb-755-8519
E:
e ctc`niel,,?'cuatt,, net
he 22 spaces.
0
Janice Cadler e i-hompson
732 Carl..,sbad 'court
Petaluma, C,A 9149�S4
C
707 774-,S912
Apri'*I 9,2019
-h eeting
"luma, PI.annin uommission, April 9t m
REs Deta
ITEM NO,, 8�A
AGE":N A
hitectura -K,eview
109 E111*s Street
FI*Ie# PLSR,, 1 i8 -*01031
missioners and Counci"Imem"ber
Dear Planni*ng Com * '
all
�=I =1111
my t,rans,, i •
tion. tour., M., tour is, community friendly and very
contact me by phone, email or text.
Jani*ce Cader Thom" son
ob
in ormat I,VL e. You can
M
0
From*
a
Sent;
Is
To.
Su ect],
3 r ---s@lcomcast,,net>
C H I F
Tuesday, April 9, 201
Aaron Hollister
109 Ellis �)tr:eet
Jr-
t�ern,c-
thi's project, As a lon:g VV&S-ral
F'M M
A. AMM -NQBM
not enough but certa"in y etter
3
# 105 Arl,ington Dr,.
Al:an R*tchie:.
M
ofthis neighborhood I
property: (inclu,dlo ng�
California Renters Legal Advocacy and Education Fund
126o Mission St
San Francisco, CA 94103:
h1@ca,r1aef4or9CaRLA
L{./8/2019
Pet-.alu,ma Plan'ni"ng colmmisslo'n
17 English, Street-
Petaluma,,
CA 94:952
citclerli cr ci.petaluma,ca,us; Richard Marzo, Ci,air, ricnard I
acehouseU,nen.com"
Scot�tAlonso, Vice: Chair, alonsoplanningpet��mail,com; Heidi.Bauer, Vice Chair,
heid......ibauer2OOO@g'ai',coM; Diana Gomez, Commissioner,
dianac�gpme2,a�gmail,com; Patrick Streeter, Commissioner.,
patricks,treete�gmailcom; Bill W01
per�t, Commissioner, wo�lert,@sonic.net; Kevin
McDonnell, Council Liaison, m,,c,donnell4council �mail.com;
X ia Email
Re: 10 9 Ellis Street
PLSR1,--,18-oo;30
Dear P�etaluma Planning Co.nmissioners,
The California Renters Legal Advocacy and' Education Fund (CaRLh* submits this
letter to inform you that the Petaluma PlanningCommission has an obligation to
a,..ide by all relevant state housinglaws When evaluating the ablove captioned
proposal,, including the, Housing Accountability Act. .
California Government Code §,65,5, 89 5, the HousingAccountability Act, prohibits
localities from denying housing development projects that are compliant with the
locality's Zoning Ordinance and General Plan at the time the application was deemed
complete, unless the locality can make findings that't e proposed housing
development would be athreat, to public, health and safety.. The most relevant section
is cop,ie a ow.,
(j) When a proposed. housing development project complies with apPlicable,
objective general plan and, zoning standards and criteria, including design
review standards, in effect at the time that the'ho�using development project's
application is determinedcom,,, to be plete, U.t the local agency proposes to
d isapprove the project or to approve it upon�the condition that the proj*e:ct:e 4;
developeddensi!
at a lower , the local agency shall base its decision regatding
the,proposed housing development project upon written findings supported by
substantial evidence on the record that both of the following conditions exist:
7-11
0
LI
IL
:3
c
FT
v
a
I
SM
0
6
hous,,in
o -11#f: bu* as
ra'-" t.ent in w-'' hich Ca 1 orni.a
p
ablic i m
throU6-1 U Ic I act
0 ffl
,,.,.,,.Icla i!s and th,.eir stati
n
it M. vU Si s
I t! whu10:51-0
litigati
M
AL
h
IC
g .n,.,qual t'O ILS needs, w.h, I we'pq�ursui
a ty
onand 10-,rovwiI;;I � d,ing educationai pirogirrams to Cali'fornia ci
p
I
Sonja Trauss
A
Co -Executive Director
--d iAdvocacyCalforniaRentersLegal an
Cc: Jerry Allen Kler Associates
'errierrylderarchitects.com
475 Gate Five Road) Suite 222
Sausalito, C.A.94965
De Cristo Family Trust
i
109 Ellis Street
Petaluma, CA 94952
7-12
U
0
U
c
E,ducati6on Fund
a
ti
S 4
incerely,
J
U1
3
13
0
h
a
J
U1
3
13
0
h
a
Aaron Ho�11*ister
From:*
a,
Sent.
0
S; t*
ubjec .
Hines, Heather < h hi nes@cityof petal u rna,,org >
Monday, April 22,2019 7:1,04 PM
Roxanna Warinak Aarion Mlo
a
Re',. 1:09 Ellis
Than:l< ;you for - our ema'11.,
Y
.Wi
I loin c d d
ThePlannine �omm"ss* onsi !III erei thle project
TAIIINIADURN
-L-,109 E11161s: Street and approved resolutions
I
recommending
considerat*ion.
to e g
.e ir a,nv a A ti...nal
questions 'please do not hesitate to contact Senior Planner Aaron Hoor
ensure that you have his contact email.
To:, Hines, Heather
t,t,v 109 Ell'is vrriol ct
tiec .
—Warninglal Use cauti
iDear Ms. Hines
myself. I have cc'd Aaron to
II w
0
7-13
backyards and windows again! That will affect tie q uality of our lives
in a Negative Way.
s
IN
E c
i
r
1
"m
:
!
i
i
N Ifs
ir
gape E i
was to cram in as,many apartments with inadequate parking space
(only 12 spaces to 13 units), acC:ommodations as possible, thus 3
stories.
Is it not true,,t,,hat there i,s a code of a mini.mal arking of � &1/2 s'', aces
perapartment? ,Oris it 2? If this is the casethisproject cearle�r y
does not meet either standard.
Whey say the apartments wig: be strictly enforced to one family
we ling per unit. Put they have no way, or will trey, be agile to
enforce teat.
,
� IIS
l r N r
E
w
:
w �
r I t
I
L i
�U41 1 UPI W401IN't�i
r
:
I�I rdp..
link
m
e,wa rom a ison to I an"
!
y yr
_r
,. is .. ... -.
M.
V II
M
i r
s"
consideration for that and all o us that live :..i. --.ere.
2 7-14
The wholettning forme smacks Ofv,r e eI
n as much as one
can on a small.piece o'f.. property with noconsideconsiderationtior anyone else
in this neighborhood.
R,espect,f,ully
K
IL IM
0 WX r I a�,
R YN6. . n a I
IIII.
p�V
3 7-151