HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 97-104 04/21/1997 a
~1
4
Resolution No. 97-1~4 N.C.S.
of the City of Petaluma, California
1 GRANTING 1998 ALLOCATIONS
z
3 WHEREAS, the City Council adopted a Residential Growth Management System and established
a the procedure for granting the allocation pool on a yearly basis with Ordinance 1716 N.C.S.
5 (Municipal Code Chapter 17.26); and
6
7 WHEREAS, interested developers and/or property owners filed their Notice of Intent to Develop
8 forms in accordance with the provisions of Ordinance 1716 N.C.S. and these, in combination with
9 reservations made the previous year and regulatory obligations for smaller in-fill projects,
to comprise the total number of allocation requests for 1998; and
11
12 WHEREAS, the total number of allocation requests equals 504 units; and
13
la WHEREAS, the 1998. allocation pool was set at 500 allocations; and
15
16 WHEREAS, the City Council finds that granting allocations does not constitute a project
17 pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Section 15061, and, therefore, no
18 environmental action is necessary at this time;
19
20 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council grants the 1998 allocations as
21 described below based on the findings that follow:
22
23 Project Name Allocations Granted
2a Capri Creek Apts. t00
25 Cross Creek 80*
26 Heritage 100
z7 Stonegate 0
28 Tuxhorn/Gatti 32
29 Willow Glen 75**
3o Reserved for in-fill 45***
31 Total 432
32
33 Reservations for 1999
3a Cross Creek 40
35 Heritage Subdivision 4****
36 Willow Glen 50
37 Total 94
38
39 * 59 previously reserved
as 75 previously reserved
al Minimum amount required by Ordinance for
42 exempt in-fill development.
43 Staff recommends these to satisfy theproject's needs.
44
45
1
resolution xo. 97-104 N.c.s. Page 1 of 2
1 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council makes the following findings in support of
2 its 1998 allocations:
3
4 Findin s
5
6 1. The number of 1998 allocations granted is consistent with the provisions of the Residential
7 Growth Management System (Municipal Code Chapter 17.26) and the applicable goals,
8 objectives, policies and programs of the 1987-2005 Petaluma General Plan.
9
l0 2. The decision to grant 1998 allocations as specified is not detrimental to the public health,
11 safety, or welfare when viewed in context of the City's overall growth rate, adequacy of
12 public facilities, and subsequent environmental review procedures to which each project is
13 subjected.
14
Is 3. There is no known need for secondary ("special") allocations in the foreseeable future.
16
17 4. The City Council finds that in regard to the request for the Stonegate development, the
t8 existing inconsistency with the General P?an Land Use designation and the residential
19 development anticipated through the request for the allocations and the issues involved in
zo annexation cause the granting of allocations to be premature: This inconsistency and the
21 necessary annexation process and the accompanying environmental review is sufficiently
22 involved that they compel the City Council to decline the granting of allocations until such
23 time as a General Plan amendment and annexation request have been considered.
24
25
26
27 :c/alloc98/jcm
2
Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City.
REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the Approved as to
Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Regular) (dGYdStlKycIQ meeting form
on the .....21st............ day of ......._......_April...._ 19..9.Y., by the -~/Q ,y
following vote: ~
City Attorney
AYES: Keller, Torliatt, Maguire, Vice Mayor Hamilton
NOES: Stomps, Mayor Hilligoss /
ABSENT: Read ~ /
' /
ATTEST : ...................._®:°DUTY.~:~........_......._................................ ~ /
City Clerk Mayor
lbunal Fila._._...__
cn w.es ees. na....9.7.-.1..Q.9........ rv.cs. Page 2 of 2