Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 04/26/1994181 1 2 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 3 4 5 REGULAR MEETING April 26, 1994 6 CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M. 7 CITY HALL PETALUMA, CA 8 9 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. 10 11 ROLL CALL: Present: Bennett *, Parkerson, Rahman, Thompson, Torliatt, vonRaesfeld; (a Absent: . Shea C STAFF: Pamela Tuft, Planning Director Jim McCann, Principal Planner Hans Grunt, Planning Technician ° Chairman PUBLIC COMMENT: None. 20 21 APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Minutes of Special Meeting of April 19, 1994 were approved 22 as printed. 23 24 DIRECTOR'S REPORT: General Plan - Conclusion of 5 -year review and hearing date - J ? 5 after discussion, it was decided to hold the public hearing for the proposed text t 6 amendments during the regularly scheduled May 24th meeting. 7 8 COMMISSIONER'S REPORT: None. 29 30 CORRESPONDENCE: Letter from Assistant Planner Dede Dolan announcing her 31 resignation. 32 33 APPEAL STATEMENT: Was read. 34 35 LEGAL RECOURSE STATEMENT: Was noted on the agenda. 36 37 NEW BUSINESS 38 PUBLIC HEARING 39 40 I. WILKINSON P.U.D. DEVELOPMENT PLAN MODIFICATION; LOT 20 OF 41 PHASE 6 OF THE KINGS'MILL SUBDIVISION OFF CASTLE DRIVE, AP NO. 42 136- 540 -044; FILE REZ94001(hg). 43 44 Request for approval of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and an amendment to the 45 PUD Development Plan for the development of three additional residential lots on 46 Lot 20 of Phase 6. 47 48 The public hearing was opened. 19 "0 SPEAKERS: 1 "2 Planning Technician Hans Grunt - Presented the staff report. 53 Chairman Bennett - Does the General Plan reflect this land use? ME Planning Commission Minutes - April 26, 1994 Hans Grunt Yes. Commissioner Torliatt - Can you point out the Urban Limit Line? Range of densities should be emphasized, focus should not be on upper densities. Commissioner vonRaesfeld - How will the RESA site be accessed? Planning Director Pamela Tuft - Clarified access through Prince Park. Tux Tuxhorn - Mr. Wilkinson has no problems with this amendment - original Assessment District showed four lots. Commis Torliatt Concerns with density at Urban Limit Line. Commissioner vonRaesfeld - Have these units been through SPARC? Pamela Tuft - These units are the same as existing phases. Commissioner vonRaesfeld These units have front entry garages; rear entry units could be utilized because of 100 -foot lots; encouraged discussion with developer at staff level to add more variety with garage entries (at least recess garages). Commissioner_ Thompson - Because of noise (since ballpark will be behind the units), garages would work very nicely in rear. Commissioner Parkerson - Agreed with other Commissioners regarding garage mixture. The public hearing was closed. A motion was made by Commissioner Torliatt and seconded by Commissioner Parkerson to recommend to the City Council adoption. of. a Mitigated Negative Declaration, amendment of the PUD Development Plan to authorize three additional units on Parcel 20 of Phase 6 of Kingsmill Subdivision as indicated on the plan submitted on December 29, 1993, and authorization of the application of the approved. Kingsmill PUD Design Guidelines for this-phase with the exception to allow for the development: of three adjacent two -story homes, based on the findings and subject to the mitigations and amended conditions listed in the staff report. COMMISSIONER SHEA Absent COMMISSIONER PARKERSON Yes COMMISSIONER RAHMAN: Yes COMMISSIONER THOMPSON: Yes CHAIRMAN BENNETT: Yes COMMISSIONER TORLIATT: Yes COMMISSIONER vonRAESFELD: Yes Environmental Findings Based upon the Initial Study and comments received, potential impacts could be avoided or reduced to a level of insignificance by mitigation measures attached as conditions of approval. There is; no substantial evidence that the project, as mitigated, would have a significant effect on the'environment. 2. The project does not have potential to affect wildlife resources as defined in the Fish and Game code, either individually or cumulatively and is exempt from Fish and Game filing fees. Mitigation Measures (Note: the following mitigations shall be applicable to the Parcel Map and subsequent development): 1. To mitigate the incremental demand for City services, the project proponent shall pay a Community Facilities Development Fee. Said fee shall be calculated at time of building permit issuance, and due and payable prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 2 133 Planning Commission Minutes - April 26, 1994 1 2 2. To mitigate the incremental increase in storm water runoff, the project proponent 3 shall pay a Storm Drainage Impact fee. Said fee shall be calculated at time of 4 building permit issuance, and due and payable prior to issuance of a Certificate of 5 Occupancy. 6 7 3. To mitigate the incremental increase in demand for local school facilities, the 8 project proponent shall pay a School Facilities fee. Said fee shall be paid prior to 9 - ssuance of a building permit. 10 4. To mitigate the incremental demand on City transportation systems, the project (� proponent shall pay a Traffic Mitigation fee. Said fee shall be calculated at time of building permit issuance, and due and payable prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 5. To mitigate the incremental demand on the City's park and recreation facilities, the 7 project proponent shall pay a Park and Recreation Land Improvement fee. Said fee `shall be calculated at time of parcel Map approval and paid on a pro -rata basis prior to issuance of a building permit for each house. 20 21 6. All grading and erosion control shall conform to the City's Erosion Control 22 Ordinance 15.76. 23 24 Findings for PUD Development Plan Amendment 25 26 1. The amendment to the PUD Development Plan to provide for the development of 27 three additional units on Parcel 20 of Phase 6 of the Kingsmill Single Family 28 Residential Subdivision will result in a more desirable use of the land and a better 29 physical environment than would be possible under any single zoning district or 30 combination of zoning districts. 31 32 2. The amendment to the PUD Development Plan to provide for the development of 33 three additional units on Parcel 20 of Phase 6 of the Kingsmill Single Family 34 Residential Subdivision is proposed on property which has a suitable relationship to 35 one (1) or more thoroughfares and that said thoroughfares are adequate to carry 36 any additional traffic generated by the development. 37 38 3. The amendment to the PUD Development Plan to provide for the development of 39 three additional units on Parcel 20 of Phase 6 of the Kingsmill Single Family 40 Residential Subdivision presents a unified and organized arrangement of buildings 41 and service facilities which are appropriate in relation to adjacent or nearby 42 properties and that adequate landscaping and /or screening is included as necessary 43 to insure compatibility. 44 45 4. The natural and scenic qualities of the site are protected, with adequate available 46 public and private spaces designated on the PUD Development Plan (and 47 amendment) to provide for the development of three additional units on Parcel 20 48 of Phase 6 of the Kingsmill Single Family Residential Subdivision. 49 5. That the development of the subject property, in the manner proposed by the 1 50 51 applicant, will not be detrimental to the public welfare, will be in the best interests 52 of the City, and will be in keeping with the general intent and spirit of the zoning 53 regulation of the City of Petaluma, with the Petaluma General Plan, and with any 54 applicable plans adopted by the City. 3 UM 1 2 3 5 6 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23, 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 Planning Commission Minutes - April 26, 1994 Conditions for the Amendment to the PUD Development Plan 1. The adjacent property to the east of the site is presently owned by the City. A commercial baseball facility is being considered to be established on this property. A disclosure .statement shall be recorded advising prospective property owners /residents of the above facts. Any future subdivision:map and resulting grant deeds shall include said disclosure statement, subject to staff review and approval prior to Tentative Parcel Map approval. 2. One (1) reproducible sepia copy of the amended. PUD Plan shall. be submitted for staff review and approval prior to Tentative Parcel Map approval. 3. Public landscaping and the landscaping of the front yards shall. conform with the approved landscape plans for the Kingsmlll Subdivision prior to acceptance of public improvements or issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy respectively. 4. The existin g home is inconsistent with the PUD Design Guidelines. With the creation of the subsequent Parcel 'Map. for this Amendment to the_ PUD Development Plan, a deed restriction shall be recorded with the lot containing the existing home which shall require ;its removal upon the sale of said parcel, subject to staff review and approval prior to its Map approval. Future development of said lot shall be subject to the adopted Design .Guidelines.for the Kingsmill Subdivision. 5. Units shall be subject to Administrative SPARC with emphasis on redesign to include rear or side entry garages and /or recessed garages. II. PROJECT STATUS: 1. Food4Less (Appeal) - Appeal, denied at Council. 2. Budget Committee Report -Will be included in next packet. 3. Drees /Premo Parcel Map - Appeal submitted today. 4. Groody Parcel Ma (Appeal) - Compromise being worked out with staff. 5. McNear Landing (Appeal) Appeal withdrawn - applicant working with staff on redesign. ADJOURNMENT 7 :25 PM. min0426 / pcmin10 4