HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 01/26/1993352
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING January 26, 1993
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P:M.
CITY HALL PETALUMA, CA
COMMISSIONERS: Present: Read, Parkerson*, Rahman, Tarr, Thompson, Torliatt;
Absent: Bennett
STAFF: Pamela Tuft, Planning, Director
James McCann, Principal Planner
Chairman
MINUTES OF January 12, 1993 were approved with corrections.
PUBLIC COMMENT: None
DIRECTOR'S REPORT: None
COMMISSIONER'S REPORT: None
CORRESPONDENCE: Residential Development Map; Revised Engineering Department
letter re: Sonoma Glen Phase 4; Greensheet; updated list of elected and appointed City
Officials.
APPEAL STATEMENT: Was read.
LEGAL RECOURSE STATEMENT: Was noted on Agenda.
CONSENT AGENDA Items recommended for consideration under, the Consent Calendar
are considered, to be routine in nature by staff and are recommended to be acted upon by a
single motion by the Planning Commission at the beginning of the meeting. with no further
discussion. The item may, however, be removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion
in its normal order on the agenda by the applicant, a Commissioner, or an interested
member of the public by a simple request.
1
353
1
6
8
9
10
11
21
22
23
24
25
L 2
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
0
1
2
3
4
PUBLIC HEARING:
NEW BUSINESS:
1. SONOMA PARKWAY
SONOMA MOUNTAIN
TSM92008(dd).
COMPANY; SONOMA GLEN IV; ELY ROAD AND
PARKWAY; AP NO. 137 - 060 -86 (Portion); File No.
Request for approval by the Sonoma Parkway Company of a Tentative Subdivision
Map application to divide a single 38.3 acre parcel into a 20 acre parcel and a 18.3
acre parcel. The following actions are required:
a. Determination that the certified Corona Ely EIR adequately addresses -
environmental issues relating to this project.
b. Approval of a Tentative Subdivision Map.
The public hearing was opened.
SPEAKERS:
Jim McCann presented the staff report.
To Mershel - Sonoma Mountain
recommendations.
Commissioner Torliatt - No approval
aesthetics.
The public hearing was closed.
Parkway Company - no problems with staff
of 209 units implied by this map; concerns with
A motion was made by Commissioner Thompson and seconded by Commissioner Rahman
recomm'e'nd to the City Council that the Environmental Impact Report prepared and
certified, in conjunction with the Corona Ely Specific Plan adequately addresses any
potentialimpacts that may result form the approval of this proposed Tentative Map.
COMMISSIONER READ: Yes
COMMISSIONER BENNETT: Absent
COMMISSIONER RAHMAN: Yes
CHAIRMAN PARKERSON: Yes
COMMISSIONER TORLIATT: Yes
COMMISSIONER THOMPSON: Yes
COMMISSIONER TARR: Yes
A motion was made by Commissioner Thompson and seconded by Commissioner Torliatt
to recommend to the City Council approval of the proposed tentative -Map to create a 20
acre parcel and an 18.3 acre parcel from the 38.3 acre "remainder lands" of the Sonoma
Mountain Parkway Company based on the findings and subject to the amended conditions
listed below:
COMMISSIONER READ: Yes
COMMISSIONER BENNE17: Absent
COMMISSIONER RAHMAN: Yes
CHAIRMAN PARKERSON: Yes
Planning Commission Minutes - 1/26/93 2
KROU
COMMISSIONER TORLIATr: Yes
COMMISSIONER THOMPSON: Yes
COMMISSIONER TARR: Yes
Findings:
1. The proposed Tentative Subdivision Map, as conditioned, is in general conformity
with the provisions of the General Plan and with the policies of the Corona /Ely
Specific Plan which permits the eventual development of the site with residential
lots.
2. No development of the lots is proposed with this application. The design goals of
the City's General Plan, Specific Plan and Zoning Ordinance will be insured
through the Planned Unit Development Rezoning which must be processed
concurrently with any future development proposals for these parcels.
3. The proposed. Tentative Subdivision Map as conditioned does not conflict with the
provisions of the Zoning Ordinance and the Planned Community District
requirements because no development is proposed at this time.
4. The proposed Tentative Subdivision Map as conditioned is in conformity with the
City's subdivision ordinance.
5. It has been found that the Environmental Impact Report prepared and certified in
conjunction with the Corona Ely Specific Plan adequately addressed any potential
impacts that may result from the approval of the proposed Tentative Map to create
a 20 acre parcel and a 18.3 acre parcel from the 38.3 acre "remainder lands" of the
Sonoma Mountain Parkway Company.
Conditions
1. The applicants/ developers shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City or
any of its boards, commission, agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action
or proceeding a &ainst the City, its boards, commission, agents, officers, or employees
to attack, set aside, void, or annul, the approval of the project when such claim or
action is brought within the time period provided for in a plicable State and /or
local statutes. The City shall promptly notify the applicant. evelopers of any such
claim, action, or proceeding. The City shall coordinate in the defense. Nothing
contained in this condition shall prohibit the City from participating in a defense of
any claim, action, or proceeding if the City bears its own attorney's fees and costs,
and the City defends the action in good faith.
2. This approval is contingent upon the recordation of the Final Map for the Sonoma
Glen Estates rural residential subdivision. The Final Map for Sonoma Glen Estates
must be recorded prior to or concurrent with the recordation of the Final Map for
Sonoma Glen IV.
3. The general circulation and related improvements of the two proposed parcels in
Sonoma Glen shall be coordinated throughout the Planning process and
development stages when necessary, as determined by the City.
Planning Commission Minutes - 1/26/93 3
355
the City reserves
1 4, In 'the event that the parcels are not developed or private improvements be installed at
> the .right to require that all necessary+ p p q en uen
subse t owners must be
the time of development of the first parcel. Any new owners shall
1 notified of this condition prior to purchase of the property.
hich alltowbe necessary
the development of the improvements
enter into an agreement w v first
6 which are deter mned by the City
7 parcel and may allow fora "pay back" of a fair share (as determined by bl c
g developers) of costs incurred by the first developer for any joint p
9- improvements.
10
11 5. The applicant shall comply with the following conditions of the City Engineering
De sewer
ae The drainage improvements, pipes, te c poi rury ed for the benefit S noma -
main located on Lot 2, which will, ro erties, shall not be
Glen Estates and other adjacent Corona Road p p
installed in the future rear or side yards or as allowed by the Director of Public
Works and the Director of Engineering.
20
b, Prior to the issuance of any future development, Lots 1 and 2 shall be subject
21 � to new conditions of approval to ensure orderly development of either ot.
22
23
24
25 PLANNING MATTERS:
— 26 ING �COIV MISSION PROJECT REVIEW FIELD TRIP.
27 II. '�LANN .
28
29 Selection of field trip date; discussion on possible sites of interest and inclusion o
30 City Council.
31
32 DISCUSSION:
33 27, 9:00 AM; leave from Lucchesi Center; staff will
34 Field Trip scheduled for February
35 verify 1date with Commissioner Bennett.
36
37
38 III. .LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITI�EE�N�SCHE ULE BUDGET. INSTITUTE
39 UPDATE ON MARCH 10 -12 CO
40
41 DISCUSSION:
42 to
43 Commissioners Parkerson and Tarr will share taccommod an two yews ago if cost s same or
44 Commissioners would prefer to stay m facility
tY Y
45 --less - .requested staff to pursue.
47
48 IV. LIAISON REPORTS:
49
50 1. SPARC Washington Square Center remodel
51 2. Tree Advisory Committee - Year end report will go to City Council - includes
52 accomplishments and planned projects.
ent Committee - Next'meeting - 2/10/93.
53 3. River Enhancem
54
Planning Commission Minutes - 1/26/93 4
356
1
2
3
4
6
7
9.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
V. ' PROJECT STATUS:
1. RESA Softball Complex - RFP's out to consultants for preparation of
environmental studies,
2. McNear Hill - Proposed revision to detached product, staff has shared
concerns with developer.
3. Beebe Abatement - Illegal gazebo has been removed.
Co mrriissioner /Councilmem :00 be r Read indicated PM a Lu cchesi with that televised hearing on Febru ary4 at 7 00 -
would be January 30 at 1
PM at City Hall.
ADJOURNMENT 7:45 PM.
6
min0126 / pcmin-8
Planning Commission Minutes - 1/26/93 5