Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 02/12/1991337 REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY. 12, 1991 CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M. CITY HALL PETALUMA, CA The Planning Commission encourages applicants or their representatives to be available at M the meeting to answer questions so that no agenda item need be deferred to a later date 0 due to alack of pertinent information. U COMMISSIONERS: Bennett, Libarle, Parkerson, Rahman, Tarr *, Thompson, Woolsey STAFF: Warren Salmons, Director Pamela Tuft, Principal Planner Teryl Phillips, Assistant Planner * Chairman APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF January 23, 1991. PUBLIC COMMENT: (15 minutes maximum). The Commission will hear public comments only on matters over which they have jurisdiction. There will be no Commission discussion or action. The chairman will allot no more than five minutes to any individual. If more than three persons wish to speak their time will be allotted so that the total amount of time allocated to this agenda item will be 15 minutes. DIRECTOR'S REPORT: Bay Area Air Quality Presentation to Council; Solar Access Discussions with Council; New employee Jennifer Barrett. COMMISS'IONER'S REPORT: Commissioner Parkerson thanked staff for distributing Bay Vision information to Commission - requested subject be placed on upcoming agenda (would like a study session with Council scheduled). Commissioner Woolsey would like a discussion of the history of Petaluma Town Plaza. CORRESPONDENCE: APPEAL STATEMENT: Within fourteen (14) calendar days following the date of a decision of the Planning Commission, the decision may be appealed to the City Council by the applicant or by any other interested party. If no appeal is made within that time, the decision shall be final. An appeal shall be addressed to the Council in writing and shall be- filed with the City Clerk. The appeal shall state specifically the grounds for the appeal and the relief sought by the appellant. 33, PLANNING MATTERS I. NOMINATION OF VICE - CHAIR. Commissioner Bennett nominated. Commissioner Libarle for Vice- Chair. Nomination was seconded by Commissioner Parkerson. COMMISSIONER WOOLSEY: Yes COMMISSIONER PARKE'RSON: Yes COMMISSIONER BENNETI': Yes COMMISSIONER RAHMAN Yes CHAIRMAN TARR: Yes COMMISSIONER LIBARLE: Abstain COMMISSIONER THOMPSON: Yes NEW BUSINESS PUBLIC HEARINGS II. BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB, 203 MARIA DRIVE (LUCCHESI PARK), PORTION OF AP NO. 136- 111 -22, FILE NO. CUP910030c). 1. Consideration of EIQ. 2. Consideration of Conditional Use Permit to allow quasi - public use .(Boys and Girls Club Facility). (Commissioner Libarle Abstained from this discussion:). The public hearing was opened. SPEAKERS: Commissioner_ Tarr - What is setback from Madison Street? Is 20' adequate? General questions regarding parking, etc. Jerry Russo - 1537 E. Madison - house adjacent to proposed building - too close to his property, good place to "hide" and drink, etc., will block his views. Dick Lieb - Applicant representative - described setbacks, will be planted with shrubs, no lawn; no bingo at this site, ;:agreeable to gray roof color with green accents. Jerry Russo - Concerns that people will hide at, side of building next to his property; more people leaving trash on street, etc. Commissioner Tarr - Landscape materials can be planted that can discourage loitering and hiding. Community Director Salmons - Maybe fence adjoining residendes should be rebuilt by applicant and should be. higher than 6'? Tracy Russo 1537 E. Madison Parking concerns. Alan Anspach - Boys and Girls Club Director answered questions regarding parking adequacy; no sports will be played at front near street; could be joint agreement with City to allow use of gym for adult uses. Commissioner Parkerson - Any problems with, neighbors at other site? Alan Ansl2ach - No - very good relationship with neighbors at existing site. Commissioner Rahman Fence height (over 6') should be considered. Dick Lieb - Fence can be repaired /replaced and height increased. 2 339 Commissioner Thompson - Will bingo -be allowed at this site? Alan Ansl2ach Not at this time. Commoner Woolsey - Would like green roof instead of gray. Commissioner Parkerson - Conditions should state that bingo will not be allowed. Commissioner Woolsey - Would like more women's restroom facilities. The public hearing was closed. A motion was made by Commissioner Parkerson and seconded by Commissioner Thompson to direct staff to issue a negative declaration based on the findings listed below: COMMISSIONER WOOLSEY: Yes COMMISSIONER PARKERSON: Yes M COMMISSIONER BENNETT: Yes 0 COMMISSIONER RAHMAN: Yes CHAIRMAN TARR: Yes U COMMISSIONER LIBARLE: Abstain COMMISSIONER THOMPSON: Yes Findings 1. The project does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California, history or prehistory. 2. The project does not have the potential to achieve short -term to the disadvantage of long- environmental goals. 3. The project does not have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable. 4. The project does not have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. S. The project is consistent with and further. promotes the objectives, goals, and policies of the General Plan. A motion was made by Commissioner Thompson and seconded by Commissioner Bennett to approve a use permit based on the findings and subject to the amended conditions listed below: COMMISSIONER WOOLSEY: Yes COMMISSIONER PARKERSON: Yes COMMISSIONER BENNETT: Yes COMMISSIONER- RAHMAN: Yes CHAIRMAN TARR: Yes COMMISSIONER LIBARLE: Abstain COMMISSIONER THOMPSON: Yes 3 Findings 1. The proposed use, subject to the conditions of approval, conforms to the intent and requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and the General Plan. 2. This project will not constitute a nuisance or be detrimental to the: public welfare of the community due to the mitigation measures incorporated in the conditions of approval Conditions All requirements of the Building Inspection Division shall be complied with, including: a. Grading must be certified when completed to indicate compliance with approved plans and will be required for occupancy. b. Soils with expansion index greater than 20 requires special design foundation per Uniform Building Code 2904(b). C. Building will require sprinklers. d. Show site drainage and grading topography. e. Indicate all utilities on site plan.. L Verify utilities are adequate for building (i.e., size of water, electrical and gas service and size of sewer). g. Responsible party to sign plans. h: Submit soils report to verify foundation design. i. Indicate group occupancy, type of construction, square footage. 2. All requirements of the Fire Marshal shall be complied with. 3. Police department recommendations regarding lighting and fencing shall be taken into consideration during SPARC review of the project. 4. Parking shall not be provided within the 25 -foot front setback area. 5. Project shall be subject SPARC review and approval, including but not limited to the following: a. Architecture shall incorporate elements of the Community Center building while also providing diversity between the two. Metal roof shall be e -haT -coal g- e- y+a-the+ -ll +aa green to identically match existing community center fireside room roof. - �r�esall- b.pr ©vided -ate a�raecent -FF -that dofft eel ©r b. If pool building and club building are to be constructed concurrently, all applicable buil'd'ing elevations must reflect pool building. If not constructed concurrently,, SPARC review and approval of interim building elevations shall be required. C. Landscaping, including evaluation of adequacy as a buffer between proJect site and adjoining residences. Trees shalf be provided within six feet of the Maria Drive curb at 25 feet on- center, average. Special .landscaping to discourage use of side setback area shall be to staff and SPARC approval. d. Pool building shall be located as far to the west as possible. e. Screening of bus parking area to the extent possible. f. Design of fencing; signs; parking, lot. g. Lighting, particularly minimization of impact on adjacent residences and to discourage loitering. 0 341 h. Sidewalk proposed adjacent to parking spaces (west edge of parking lot) shall be designed to eliminate potential pedestrian /vehicle conflicts. 6. Concurrent activities (e.g., rental of multi - purpose room /rental of pool) shall be based on availability of parking, subject to staff determination should complaints be received. 7. Proof shall be provided to city staff that additional parking is available (Little League field parking lot, Bernard Eldridge School) prior to rental of facility for other than Club use. ( 8. The following development fees shall be applicable to this project: Major Facilities G) Traffic Mitigation, Storm Drainage Impact, Community Facilities Development, and O School Facilities. Any waiver of fees must be approved by the City Council. 9. At no time shall _future activities exceed Performance Standards specified in the C) Uniform Building Code, Section 22 -301 of the Petaluma Zoning Ordinance, and the 1987 General.Plan. 10. No storage of any type shall take place outdoors. 11. This use permit may be recalled for review to the Planning Commission /Community Development Director at any time due to complaints regarding objectionable operating characteristics. At such time, the Commission /Director may add or modify conditions of approval. 12. Any work within a public right -of -way requires. an excavation permit from the Department of Public Works. 13. Applicant to work with neighbors on design /height offence, subject to approval by staff. 14. Bingo will not be allowed at this facility without a use permit amendment. IS. One more women's toilet will be added. III. POLLACK, VETERINARY CLINIC, 512 PETALUMA BLVD. SOUTH, AP NO.008- 265 -08, FILE NO. 1.697(tp). 1. Consideration of EIQ. 2. Consideration of Conditional Use Permit to allow conversion of an existing building to a veterinary office. The public hearing was opened. SPEAKERS: Jerry Nelson - 402 Liberty Road - Real estate agent for applicant and property owner - would like'Saturday hours,until 6 PM; no outside kennels. Dr. Pollack - Applicant - 1660 LaReina Way, Palm Springs - answered questions. Commissioner Bennett - Would Saturday hours until 4:30 be acceptable? Dr. Pollack - Yes (to above question). The public hearing was closed. 5 A motion was made by Commissioner Libarle and seconded by Commissioner Rahman to direct staff to prepare a negative declaration based on the findings listed below: COMMISSIONER WOOLSEY: Yes COMMISSIONER PARKERSON: Yes COMMISSIONER BENNETT: Yes COMMISSIONER RAHMAN: Yes CHAIRMAN TARR: Yes COMMISSIONER LIBARLE: Yes COMMISSIONER THOMPSON: Yes Findings: 1. The project, as conditionally approved, does not have the potential to degrade the quality - of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, causel a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. 2. The project, as conditionally approved, does. not have the potential to achieve short - term to the disadvantage of long- term, environmental goals. 3. The project, as conditionally approved, does not have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable. 4. The project, as conditionally approved, does not have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. 5. The project is consistent with and further promotes the objectives, goals, and policies of the General Plan. A motion was made by Commissioner Libarle and seconded by Commissioner; Woolsey to approve a conditional use permit based on the findings and subject to the amended conditions listed below: COMMISSIONER WOOLSEY: Yes COMMISSIONER PARKERSON: Yes COMMISSIONER BENNEIT: Yes COMMISSIONER RAHMAN: Yes CHAIRMAN TARR: Yes COMMISSIONER LIBARLE: Yes COMMISSIONER THOMPSON: Yes Findings 1. The proposed feline medicine veterinary practice, as conditioned, will conform to the requirements and intent of the Petaluma Zoning Ordinance.. 2. The proposed .feline medicine veterinary practice, as conditioned, will: conform to the requirements and intent, goals, and policies of the Petaluma General Plan. 0 343 3. The proposed feline medicine veterinary practice will not constitute a nuisance or be detrimental to the public welfare of the community. Conditions 1. Approval of the conditional use permit is contingent upon execution and staff approval of a lease agreement for required off -site parking to serve the veterinary office. The lease period and location of parking shall be specified in the agreement and signatures of the respective property owners shall be obtained. The term of this use permit shall expire upon termination of the lease agreement unless alternative parking is provided to satisfy Zoning Ordinance requirements. (3) 2. Business activities shall be limited to use of indoor areas. No outdoor storage of O materials or waste or outdoor boarding of animals shall be permitted. 3. Appointments shall be limited to the period between 8:00 AM and 8:00 PM, (, Monday through Thursday; 8:00 AM to 6:00 PM Friday; and 8:00 AM to 4:00 4:30 Q PM Saturday. 4. Business patrons shall be encouraged by the operator to transport animals in closed containers or cages to prevent straying and injury of animals, and nuisances to neighboring properties. 5. No window openings shall be permitted along the northerly building wall. 6. The project shall be subject to administrative SPARC review prior to issuance of a building permit, or commencement of the use if no building permit is required, with emphasis on the following: a. Repair or replacement of existing perimeter fencing. b. Provision of additional landscaping in the rear yard parking area, and upgrade of front yard landscaping. C. Review of proposed parking agreement. 7. The following requirements of the Chief Building Inspector shall be met: a. Exterior walls within 20 feet of property line must be 1 hour fire rated. b. One handicapped parking space required. C. Demolition permit required prior to removal of any existing structure. d. Two toilets will be required if four or more persons and both sexes are employed. 8. The following requirements of the City Engineer shall be met: a. Existing broken sidewalk located along project frontage shall be repaired prior to occupancy. 9. The following requirements of the Fire Marshal shall be met: 7 344 a. Provide fire extinguishers 2 A rated ABC dry chemical type as required by the Fire Marshal. b. No extension cords. All equipment and appliances shall be direct plug in. C. Provide metal or flame retardant plastic waste cans. d. Post address at or near main entry door - minimum two -inch letters. e. Provide signs over exit doors stating - "This door to remain unlocked during business' hours ". Letters shall not be less than Y -high. f. Provide KNOX Box for key control located on building as required by the Fire Marshal. g. Permit required for Nitrus Oxide system for surgery room. Provide detail of location. 10. Should substantive complaints be received regarding the operation of. the use and /or compliance with conditions of approval, this use permit shall be. brought back to the Planning Commission for modification to its conditions of approval or for revocation. IV. RIVERFRONT WAREHOUSE DISTRICT, 201 and 205 G STREET;. 200, 204 AND 206 H STREET; 508, 510,512 AND 514 2ND STREET, FILE NO.3.4;16(gb). 1. Consideration of EIQ. 2. Consideration of rezoning from Highway Commercial to Riverfront Warehouse District. The public hearing was opened. SPEAKERS: Jane Hamilton - not in zoning area, but agrees with proposal. A motion was made by Commissioner .Parkerson and seconded. by Commissioner Bennett to recommend to City Council the adoption of a negative declaration for this rezoning based on the findings listed below: COMMISSIONER WOOLSEY: Yes COMMISSIONER PARKERSON: Yes COMMISSIONER BENNETI': Yes COMMISSIONER RAHMAN: Yes CHAIRMAN TARR: Yes COMMISSIONER LI Yes COMMISSIONER THOMPSON: Yes Findings 1. No significant land use or environmental impacts have been identified for this project. 8 345 2. This project is consistent with the City of Petaluma General Plan goals, policies and objectives and with the Mixed Use land use designation. 3. This project will not have impacts related to biotics since these parcels are already developed.. A motion was made by Commissioner Parkerson and seconded by Commissioner Thompson to recommend City.-Council approval of this rezoning based on the findings listed below: COMMISSIONER WOOLSEY: Yes COMMISSIONER PARKERSON: Yes Lo COMMISSIONER BENNETT: Yes COMMISSIONER RAHMAN: Yes CHAIRMAN TARR: Yes 0 COMMISSIONER LIBARLE: Yes COMMISSIONER THOMPSON: Yes U Findings 1. No significant land use or environmental impacts have been identified for this project. A negative declaration has been adopted. 2. This project is consistent with the City of Petaluma General Plan goals, policies and objectives and with the Mixed Use land use designation. 3. This project will bring the land use for these parcels into conformance with their zoning designation. DISCUSSION ITEM V. TREE COMMITTEE 1. Consideration of Heritage Tree Ordinance. 2. Consideration of policy to preserve street tree planter strips. General Discussion: Written standards will be necessary. This project is unexpensive for the City. Don Waxman, member of Tree Committee in attendance. A motion was made by Commissioner Bennett and seconded by Commissioner Parkerson to advance the following policies and ordinance to the City Council for further consideration. COMMISSIONER WOOLSEY: Yes COMMISSIONER PARKERSON: Yes COMMISSIONER BENNETT: Yes COMMISSIONER RAHMAN: Yes CHAIRMAN TARR: Yes COMMISSIONER LIBARLE: Yes COMMISSIONER THOMPSON: Yes C 4 i6 CHAPTER 8.28 HERITAGE AND LANDMARK TREES 8.28.010 INTENT AND PURPOSE The City has established, through provisions within its General Plan, that urban trees contribute not only scenic beauty, but that they reduce soil erosion, improve air quality, provide wind protection, abate noise and offer shade to reduce energy consumption. The City has further established that certain heritage and landmark tree resources exist within the City which by the nature of their physical, social, or environmental significance or contribution to the identity of neighborhoods, merit community recognition and protection. It is therefore the intent and purpose of this article to promote the health, safety and welfare of present and future residents of "the City of Petaluma by providing for the identification and preservation of heritage and landmark tree resources existing within the City. It is further the intent and purpose of this article to encourage cooperative neighborhood efforts toward preservation of groups of trees located on publicly or privately owned lands which collectively contribute to a unique and attractive living environment for residents. 8.28.020 LIMITS OF APPLICABILITY The provisions of this article shall be limited to existing individual heritage and /or landmark trees and /or groves of such trees within the City limits. 8.28.030 ADMINISTRATION The Director of Community Development or duly authorized representative, hereinafter referred to as the Director, shall be charged with administration of the. provisions within this article. 8.28.040 OFFICIAL REGISTER An official register of Heritage and Landmark Trees shall be developed and maintained by the City. The register shall contain information specifying the location, size, and species of tree ,resources designated under this article, and shall identify findings for each resource designation. 8.28.050 NOMINATION OF TREES A.. Trees on private property may be nominated for designation to the City register by property owners of the land on which the trees are located. Nomination shall be made by application filed with the Director and any 10 347 additional documentation required by the Community Development Department. Nomination may be made by individual owners of a single tree or group of trees, or by neighborhoods desiring to preserve a group of trees under multiple ownerships which collectively contribute td the appearance of the neighborhood streetscape. B. The Director is authorized to conduct and prepare an inventory of trees on public property eligible for nomination to the City register. From time to time, additional trees on public lands may be rominated for designation to the City register by any resident or employee of the City by appropriate application filed with the Community Development Department. C. Fees for nomination to the City Register shall be established through Co Co Resolution of the City Council. 0 8.28.060 CRITERIA FOR DESIGNATION U Designation to the register shall be based upon one or more of the following findings: A. Heritage Trees 1. Indigenous species of historic, cultural or environmental significance to the community. 2. Commemorative planting by a group of citizens or the City in recognition of a significant community member or event. B. Landmark Trees 1. Exceptional size /age as relates to generally accepted horticultural standards for the species. 2. Unusual or distinctive form, character, function or visual impact as relates to the species and setting. 3. Association with a historically significant person, structure, or event. 4. Groves or stands of trees which collectively meet one or more of the criteria set forth in subsections 1 through 3 above. 8.28.070 ADOPTION AND AMENDMENT TO REGISTER A. Upon receipt of nominations for designation, the Director shall calendar the same for consideration by the City Historic and Cultural Preservation Committee. A report shall be prepared containing a description of the tree(s) nominated and recommendations for or against designation. Proceedings not specified herein for obtaining approval for designation shall be the same as set forth in Title 21 (Zoning Ordinance) on matters referred for Committee review. 11 34 Upon consideration :of the application, the Committee may adopt or reject the recommendation of the Director. Adoption of the designation of trees to the City register shall 'be established by recordation, of the meeting minutes and shall contain findings in support of each designation. B. The official Tree Register may be amended from time to time for the purpose of designating additional ;trees as heritage or landmark trees. In such case, the procedure set forth in subsection (A) of this section shall apply. 8.28.080 NOTIFICATION OF DESIGNATION The owner of property on which is located any tree designated in the official register as a heritage or landmark tree shall be notified of that fact by mail within thirty (30) days following such designation. A notice of .deed restriction shall also be recorded against, the property to ensure that all subsequent property owners are duly advised of the City tree designation. 8.28.090 PRESERVATION AND MAINTENANCE The Director shall be authorized to establish and maintain guidelines which set forth recommended policies governing the care and maintenance. of designated tree resources. The guidelines shall apply to all designated trees located on public lands, and shall be made available to owners of private property upon which a designated tree is located. 8.28.100 PERMITS FOR CERTAIN ACTIVITIES A. None of the following activities shall be performed unless a permit is first granted by the Director: 1. Removal or willful destruction of any heritage or landmark tree. 2. _Trimming, pruning, or removal of a substantial portion of the branches or foliage of heritage or landmark trees. 3. Disturbing the soil or leaving pl- ac- ing-- nFiy-- c- henrical--- er-- -e+hef deleterious substance or material on the soil within the drip line .area of any heritage or landmark tree located on public lands. B. Application for permit shall be filed with the Community Development Department on a form prescribed by the Director, and shall be accompanied by any other pertinent information that may be required. Fees for. required . permits shall be established by Resolution of the City Council. The permit shall be granted by the Director upon the following findings: 1. In the case of removal, a. A determination by the Historic and Cultural Preservation Committee that the heritage tree must be removed in order for 12 349 the property owner to use the property for any principle use permitted as of right or by special permit under the City of Petaluma Zoning Ordinance for the zoning district in which the property is located, and that such use could not be made of the property unless the tree is removed; or b... That_the condition. of_ the tree with respect_. to. disease, danger of falling or interference with utility services is such that the public health, safety or welfare require its removal; or C. That the tree or tree roots are causing, or threatening to cause, damage to any main structure on the owner's property; or Q) d. That the tree no longer meets the criteria for a heritage or 0 landmark tree set forth in Section 8.28.060 U Issuance of the required permit for removal of trees may, at the discretion of the granting authority, be conditioned upon replacement of lost trees in kind or with 24" box (1 1/2" caliper) specimens of similar character. 2. In the case of any other activity for which a permit is required, that such activity is necessary either to preserve the tree or to engage in lawful construction activity on the property. C. The Director shall delete from the City register any designated tree for which a permit to remove is granted pursuant to this section. 8.28.110 VIOLATIONS This section to be developed following consultation with the City Attorney. Recommendations of the Tree Preservation Committee include 1) establishment of a process for issuing citations carrying the charge of "infraction", 2) upon conviction, imposition of penalties requiring payment of fines ($500 maximum) and restitution by planting of 24" box -sized trees. 8.28.120 APPEAL OF DIRECTOR'S DETERMINATION Any person dissatisfied with the decision of the Director taken under this article may appeal such decision to. the Historic and Cultural Preservation Committee. Such appeal shall follow proceedings set forth under Title 21 (Zoning Ordinance) on referred for Zoning Administrator review. Any appeal of the decision of the Historic and Cultural Preservation Committee shall follow proceedings as set forth under Title 21 (Zoning Ordinance) on matters referred for Committee review. 13 RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A POLICY TO PRESERVE PUBLIC STREET LANDSCAPE PLANTERS WHEREAS, the City has established, through provisions within its General Plan and policy, that street trees and landscape planter strips enhance the function, safety and appearance- of the City's streets; and WHEREAS, the Ad Hoc Tree Preservation Committee, composed of representatives of the Planning Commission, Recreation, Music and Parks Commission, :Site Plan and Architectural Review Committee, and a private citizen, has recommended. adoption of a City policy favoring 'the retention and preservation of existing public street landscape planters for the purpose: of encouraging street tree plantings; and WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission, Recreation, Music and Parks Commission, and Site Plan and Architectural Review Committee have each considered the matter and forwarded their separate recommendations in. favor of such policy; and WHEREAS, the City Council, upon review of all information forwarded by the aforementioned bodies, has found public street. landscape planters to contribute to the aesthetic beauty of Petaluma's streetscape, and that preservation is feasible through implementation of existing City processes; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Public Works Director shall implement the policy hereinafter stated, to ensure the retention and preservation of existing - public street landscape planters: A. All existing- public street landscape planters shall be retained and preserved for the purpose of providing live landscaping along the frontages of City streets. To this end, covering, paving, sealing, or filling of public landscape planter areas with impervious materials shall be prohibited. B. When, during the course of a development roject, it is necessary to remove or .reconstruct public street improvements ( .e., curb, gutter, sidewalk), they shall be reconstructed to preserve or restore any previously existing public landscape planter. Existing. street trees and other landscaping shall be preserved to the extent possible, -or replaced to the satisfaction of City staff. Required encroachment, excavation or tree removal permits shall be obtained, prior to commencement of proposed work. C. Exceptions. Sections A and B shall not apply to access ways permitted under Section 13.04.110 of the Petaluma Municipal Code as exempted encroachments. D. Any unauthorized work conducted within public right -of -way landscape areas shall be brought into conformance with the intent and provisions of this policy, and applicable provisions of the Petaluma Municipal Code pertaining to encroachments on City property. Upon findings of such unauthorized work, the City shall require removal of impervious material installed, and restitution of previously existing landscaping, pursuant to the procedure set forth under Municipal Code Section 13.04.150. E. Any appeal of the determination- of the Public Works Director shall be processed pursuant to Municipal Code Section 13.04.160. 14 • VI. DISCUSSION MATTERS: 1. 1990 -91 BUDGET STATUS 2. 1991 -92 BUDGET DEVELOPMENT 3. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES PLANNING COMMISSION INSTITUTE DISCUSSION: General; information regarding 1990 -91 budget status and 1991 -92 budget development was supplied: by Community Development Director Salmons. Upcoming League of California Cities Planning Commissioner's Institute was discussed. ADJOURNMENT 9:00 PM 0212 /jabthard / pcmin -3 351 15