Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 04/09/199137 r � REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CITY HALL APRIL 9, 1991 7:00 P.M. PETALUMA, CA COMMISSIONERS: Bennett, Libarle, Parkerson, Rahman, Tarr *, Thompson, Woolsey STAFF: Warren Salmons, Director Pamela Tuft, Principal Planner Teryl Phillips, Assistant Planner Jane Thomson, Senior Planning Technician * Chairman MINUTES OF MARCH 26, 1991 were approved as presented. PUBLIC COMMENT: (15 minutes maximum). None. DIRECTOR'S REPORT: Distribution of Housing Element. COMMISSIONER'S REPORT: None. CORRESPONDENCE: Letter from Westside Shell; letter from City Engineer regarding Hillview Subdivision. APPEAL STATEMENT: Was read. 1 378 OLD BUSINESS CONTINUED PUBLIC` HEARING I. WESTSIDE SHELL, 421 WASHINGTON STREET, AP NO. 006- 361 -32, FILE NO. 1.695akt). 1. Consideration of EIQ. 2. Consideration of conditional use permit to allow a convenience market at an existing gas station. (Continued from 3/26/91) The public hearing continued. SPEAKERS: Sonya Anderson - 134 Howard - Neighbor who owns 421 Washington Street ,(next door) does not want convenience market - would impact homes in neighborhood;,, already a 24- hour market (7 -1.1) convenience, market across street from Westside Shell two are not needed; has had to go to Shell station in the middle of the night to ask people to be quiet since the station has been open 24 hours. Ken Giffin - Owner of Westside .Shell - had not heard noise complaints ,prior to this meeting; could put some fencing up to prevent people from going behind Shell station; now sells candy, chips, and sodas; firewood was being displayed outside of station until : notified by City to discontinue; service station business very competitive, needs more income than is generated by. gasoline sales only; no walk -ins; people drive up for gasoline. Commissioner Tarr - (to Mr. Giffin) would you. be wilding to give Ms. Anderson your home phone number in there are problems in the middle of night? (answer from Mr. Giffin, yes). Commissioner Libarle - Does staff have a problem with. allowing an ice machine? (staff - no). Ken Giffin - Would. like limited further expansion in the very near future. Commissioner Tarr - If we discuss a different project now we will have to renotice. Commissioner Parkerson - We are discussing a 250 s_q.ft. mini - market project. Commissioner Thompson - Can phone booths be "cleaned -up" and moved if possible? Ken Giffin Considerable expense might be incurred to move phones.. Director Salmons - Phone booths might be able `to'be moved out near where driveway will be closed. The public hearing was closed. A motion was made by Commissioner Parkerson and seconded by Commissioner Libarle to direct staff to issue a negative declaration based on the following findings: COMMISSIONER WOOLSEY: Yes COMMISSIONER PARKERSON: Yes COMMISSIONER BENNETT: Yes COMMISSIONER RAHMAN: Yes CHAIRMAN TARR: Yes COMMISSIONER LIBARLE: Yes COMMISSIONER THOMPSON: Yes 2 �, 7s' • 3 ' 7 @ 9 Findings . 1. Since the site has been long developed, The project, does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self - sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number.or restrict the. range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. 2. The project, as conditionally approved, does not have the potential to achieve short- Co term to the disadvantage of long -term, environmental goals. 3. Since no additional development is being discussed at this time, the project, as O conditionally approved, does not have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable. U 4. The project, as conditionally approved, does not have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. A motion was made by Commissioner Libarle and seconded by Commissioner Thompson to approve a conditional use permit for a 250 sq.ft. convenience market based on the findings and subject to the following amended findings: COMMISSIONER WOOLSEY: Yes COMIVIISS PARKERSON: Yes COMMISSIONER BENNETT: Yes COMMISSIONER RAHMAN: Yes CHAIRMAN TARR: Yes COMMISSIONER LIBARLE Yes COMMISSIONER THOMPSON: Yes Findings: 1. This:; service station has been long established and used by neighborhood residents without adverse effects and is therefore permitted by public convenience and necessity. 2. The ;proposed service station with a 250 square foot convenience market use is in accord with the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and the purposes of protecting and servicing the commercial center in the Central Commercial district in which the site :is located. As conditioned, the station and proposed convenience market will conform to the requirements and intent of the Petaluma Zoning Ordinance Section 21 -403 ( "Special Standards and considerations Governing Particular Uses "). 3. The proposed service station with 250 square foot convenience market, as conditioned, will conform to the requirements and intent, goals, and policies of the Petaluma General Plan. 4. The proposed service station with 250 square foot convenience market will not constitute a nuisance or be detrimental to the public welfare of the community. 3 i l i Conditions: 1. The most northerly driveway on Howard Street shall be eliminated, and replaced with curb, gutter and sidewalk to City specifications within 45 days of Use Permit approval. 2. This project shall be subject to Administrative 'SPARC review, with particular emphasis on the following: a. A revised landscape plan to include additional landscaping at property lines, and the extension of landscaping at the corner of Howard and Washington Streets.. b. Lighting of the service station and proposed convenience market. C. Signs shall comply with all provision of the City Sign Ordinance. d. Trash enclosure shall comply with all City Standards. e. Parking shall comply with all City Standards. f. Fencing locations and design. g. All outside display shall be eliminated, to including, newspaper boxes, ice machines, etc. 3. Parking stalls shall be striped for a total of five (5) stalls. 4. Existing fencing and asphalt shall be repaired /replaced as deemed necessary by staff. Additional fencing to be provided around west side of service station building in order to preclude access by other than employees of the service station. 5. Delivery of petroleum and convenience market products shall be limited to the hours of 12 A.M. to 12 P.M. (midnight to noon). 6. At no time shall future business activities . exceed Petaluma Zoning Ordinance Performance Standards as set forth in Section 22 -301, or use conditions as set forth in Section 21 -403. 7 fo storage of any type shall take place outdoors. There shall be no storage or sale Iles on the site; no outdoor auto repair or storage or display of tires, and no portable or moveable display racks shall be permitted on the exterior grounds; no parking lot vendors. 8. This use permit may be recalled to the Planning Commission at any time due to complaints regarding objectionable operating characteristics. At such time, the Commission may add or modify conditions of approval.. 9. Any requests to expand the convenience market shall be considered as an amendment to this Use Permit and shall be referred to the Planning Commission for review. 10. All work within the public right -of -way :requires an excavation permit from the Department of Public Works. 11. No sale of alcoholic beverages is permitted. 12. All conditions of the Chief Building Official shall be complied with, including: 2 an" 381 co M O U a. The sales office area is a B -2 occupancy and does not effect this division. For comments on future market more information on interior layout is required. 13. All conditions of the Fire Marshal shall be complied with, including: a. Provide fire sprinkler head over trash enclosure at rear of building from the domestic water system. ----- eedis -o€�e City- Engineer- shall be-e ©plied- with; inelu�ig 14. a-. Driveway on Howard Street closest to Washington Street must be closed to City Standards within 45 days of approval of Use Permit. 15. All conditions of the Sonoma County Public Health Agency shall be complied with, including: a. Prior to issuance of building permits and before any continuing use, obtain approval of Sonoma County Public Health; contact Bob Herr, 525 -6544. b. A Public Health annual permit is required. 16 Telephone booths to be relocated away from residences and closer to service station office per staff review and approval within six months from date of use permit issuance. II. MEADOW PARK OFFICE COMPLEX, MCD.OWELL BLVD. NORTH, AP NO.'s 137- 170 -32, 137 - 180 -28, FILE NO.3.421(tp). L Consideration of PUD Amendment. (Continued from 3/12/91) The public hearing was continued. SPEAKERS: Commissioner Woolsey - How were setbacks determined? Is the setback adequate? Teryl Phillips - Yes, setbacks should be adequate. Linda Rahman - How will project look from Wood Sorrel side? Teryl Phillips - More landscaping should be provided along that frontage - however, homes back onto Wood Sorrel and fencing obscures views into project. Mike Gallagher - Applicant - No problems with staff conditions; would like retail to be allowed (that allowed in Zoning Ordinance); answered site questions, landscaping questions. Commissioner Bennett - Confused by retail question - please explain. Mike Gallagher Would just like to have retail that is allowed in the Zoning Ordinance. Director. Salmons - Read PUD description of permitted conditional uses. Teryl Phillips - Read letter from Mr. Gallagher regarding proposed retail uses into the record. The public hearing was closed. 5 o A motion was made by Commissioner Libarle and seconded by Commissioner Parkerson to approve the proposed amendment based on the 'findings and subject to the amended conditions listed below: COMMISSIONER WOOLSEY: Yes COMMISSIONER PARKERSON: Yes COMMISSIONER BENNETT.: Yes COMMISSIONER RAHMAN: Yes CHAIRMAN TARR: Yes COMMISSIONER LIBARLE: Yes COMMISSIONER THOMPSON: Yes Findings 1. The Meadow Park. Office complex is .proposed on property which has a suitable relationship to McDowell Blvd. North and to Wood Sorrel Drive and these said thoroughfares will be adequate as conditionally improved under the Meadow Park PUD to carry additional traffic generated by the development plan. 2. The plan for the proposed development; represents a unified and organized arrangement of buildings and site improvements which are appropriate in relation to adjacent or nearby properties as .conditionally approved and that adequate landscaping and /or screening will be included upon SPARC review to insure compatibility. 3. The nature and scenic qualities of" the site are protected with adequate available public and private spaces including landscaped entryway to the office complex at Meadow Park along Southpoint Blvd. 4. The development of the subject property in the manner proposed by the applicant and conditioned by the City will not be detrimental to the public welfare, will be in the best interest of the City and will be in keeping, with the general intent and spirit of the Zoning Regulation of the City of Petaluma and with the Petaluma General Plan. Conditions 1. This project shall. be subject to review by the Site Plan and Architectural Review mmittee, and all applicable conditions of SPARC approval shall become conditions of the Unit Development Plan hereby approved: Plans submitted for SPARC review shall reflect the following provisions: ' a. Proposed setbacks of all buildings from street frontage property lines shall be identified on the site plan, with minimum 20' setback. maintained along Wood Sorrel Drive and. Southpoint Blvd. and 40' along McDowell Blvd. North. b. The center driveway access along Wood Sorrel shall be aligned with Yarberry Drive. C. Pedestrian path along McDowell. Blvd. North shall be modified on the site plan to reflect consistency with the meandering path shown on landscape Con 383 plans. Direct pedestrian connections shall be provided between buildings on- site and from street frontages. d. Landscape plans shall be modified to incorporate use of water - conserving plantings and irrigation systems to the extent possible within the project site. Existing lawn treatment located in street tree planter strips along the project frontages may be retained. e. Parking layout shall be modified to reflect more even distribution of compact stalls throughout the site. f. All materials proposed for use in pedestrian walks, the courtyard paving, retaining walls and trellis structure shall be clearly identified and detailed. M Samples of all building construction materials and color schemes shall be Q included with SPARC submittal. U 2. SPARC review of the project shall emphasize appropriate integration of C) architectural and landscape design and materials to achieve compatibility between this use and neighboring development. To this end, phasing of all site and landscape improvements shall be reviewed for provision of adequate parking, access, and landscaping in conjunction with each building constructed. 3. A sign program shall be developed for the project, in conjunction with SPARC review of Phase 1 improvements. 4. The project proponents shall provide for perpetual maintenance of all landscape areas located within the public right -of -way along McDowell Blvd. 5. The following requirements of the Chief Building Official shall be met: a. A soils engineer will be required to certify that all fill placed in this area has been done in accordance with Chapter 70 of the 1988 UBC before a building permit can be issued. 6. The following requirements of the Fire Marshal shall be met: a. Provide fire extinguisher 2 A rated A B C dry chemical type as required by the Fire Marshal. b. Building shall be protected by an automatic fire extinguishing . system as required by Section 10.306A of the 1988 Edition of the Uniform Fire Code. C. Permit required from Fire Marshal's office for sprinkler system alteration prior to work being started. Two sets of plans are required. d. Provide signs over exit doors stating, "This door to remain unlocked during business hours ". Letters shall not be less than one inch high. e. Provide KNOX box for key control for each individual building as required by the Fire Marshal. f. Provide key with tag indicating address and suite number for KNOX box. g. Check valve in Fire Department connection to be installed above grade. 7 7. Except as herein amended, all other applicable provisions of the Meadow Park PUD shall remain in full force and effect. & No retail uses (other than those allowed under the adopted PUD Zoning this : area) shall be allowed. Hours of any approved future retail uses shall be compatible with office uses. Note. Proponents were directed to amend plans prior to Council review of the project to reflect the following. a) deletion of all references to specific retail components. b) consistency between site and landscape plans with regard to curvilinear design of McDowell Blvd. pedestrian walkway. c) relationship ° of Yarbeny Drive to project site plan. NEW BUSINESS PUBLIC HEARINGS III. SIERRA FENCE COMPANY, 1075 LAKEVILLE ST., AP NO. 005- 020 -27, FILE NO. CUP91006akt). 1. Consideration of EIQ. 2. Consideration of conditional use permit. to allow the operation of a fence and lumber company. The public -hearing was opened. SPEAKERS: Fred Yoklev - Manager, Sierra Fence and Lumber; answered questions regarding property lines; Sierra Fence also has San Jose and Sacramento operations with retail a very small part of operations; willing to revise application to eliminate retail began to remove "objectionable" operating characteristics after receiving staff report (i.e., moving lumber to rear of lot); staff, suggestions might not, allow enough on -site storage. Commissioner Parkerson - Where will lumber storage be ?` Fred Yoklev - storage behind new slatted fence area is economically necessary to 12 or even 16 feet height; described egress and. ingress as they now exist; agreed that left turn from driveway area is very difficult. Commissioner Tarr Is the applicant aware of frontage improvement expenses along Lakeville (Lakeville Planline) which may be payable in the future? Fred Yoklev - Cleared off the site prior to. moving to the site - 20 -30 vehicles were removed so Sierra Fence could occupy; weed abatement has taken place. Pamela Tuft - This item can be continued to the next meeting to allow review of new site plan. Director Salmons - Lakeville Planline `improvements will probably commence in Summer of 1993.. Commissioner Parkerson - This item should be continued to allow review of new plans. Pamela Tuft - This can be continued to April 23. Commissioner Bennett : Would like to continue this item. The public hearing was closed. This item was continued to the Planning Commission meeting of April 23, 1991. -V rY^ ,. ^..w:e�I! •. - �s��c9 :fit'} -`.y. M IV. BURBANK HOUSING, HILLVIEW OAKS, SONOMA MOUNTAIN PARKWAY, PORTION OF AP NO: s 136 - 1,20 -09 AND 23, FILE NO.'s REZ,TSM910010c). 1. Consideration of rezoning to Planned Unit District (PUD). 2. Consideration of PUD Development Plan. 3. Consideration of Tentative Subdivision Map for a 30 -unit attached dwelling complex and common area. The public hearing was opened. LO SPEAKERS: Commission Discussion - General discussions regarding high - amenity areas so near to this 0 high- density area. This project was included in the overall Corona /Ely plan. U John Morgan - Burbank Housing Representative - during meeting today with staff, a compromise was reached with Fire Marshal, Engineering and Community Development; all siting ;questions can be worked out; adjacent developers have no problems with proposed plans. Commissioner Woolsey - What are the sizes of the units? John Morgan - About 1,320 sq.ft. Jim Hamilton - 410 Pipestone Circle - lives in a Young America subdivision right behind proposed project; isn't this density higher than what was planned? Concerns regarding overcrowding of schools, traffic. Tom Thompson - 4.14 Pipestone Circle - echoed above concerns; does not want this whole area rezoned to higher density - would like five units per acre or less. Commissioner Salmons - Densities are slightly less - are just being "packaged" differently,- no change in density in total yield - no impact on schools or traffic, maybe less of an impact. The public hearing was closed. A motion was made by. Commissioner Libarle and seconded by Commissioner Rahman to recommend to the City Council 1) adoption of an environmental determination that project specific impacts anticipated through the preparation and certification of the Corona /Ely Specific Plan Environmental Impact report have been adequately identified and mitigated through the adoption of specific conditions of approval applicable to the proposed Hillview Oaks project and 2) approval of the proposed rezoning based on the following findings: COMMISSIONER WOOLSEY: Yes COMMISSIONER PARKERSON: Yes COMMISSIONER BENNETT: Yes COMMISSIONER RAHMAN: Yes CHAIRMAN TARR: Yes COMMISSIONER LIBARLE: Yes COMMISSIONER THOMPSON: Yes Findings: 1. That the development, plan as conditioned, results in a more desirable use of the land, and a better physical environment than would be possible under any single zoning district or combination of zoning districts. 01 ftl 2. That the plan for the proposed development, as conditioned, present a unified and organized arrangement of buildings and service :facilities which are appropriate in relation to adjacent and nearby properties and associated proposed projects and that adequate landscaping and /or screening is included if necessary to insure compatibility. 3. That adequate available public and private spaces are designatedl on the Unit Development Plan. 4. That the development of the subject property, 'in the manner proposed by the applicant and conditioned by the City, will not be detrimental to the public welfare, will be in the best interests of the City and will be in keeping with the general intent and spirit of the zoning regulations of the City of Petaluma and with the Petaluma General Plan. S. That the PUD District is proposed on property which has a suitable relationship to one or more thoroughfares (Sonoma Mountain Parkway) to carry any additional traffic generated by the development. 6. That the adoption of an environmental determination that project specific impacts anticipated through the preparation and certification of the Corona /Ely Specific Plan Environmental 'Impact Report have been adequately identified and mitigated through the adoption of specific conditions of approval applicable to the proposed Hillview Oaks project. A motion was made by Commissioner Woolsey and seconded by Commissioner Parkerson to recommend to °the: City Council approval of the PUD plan for development based on the findings set forth within the Rezoning action and subject to the amended conditions listed below: COMMISSIONER WOOLSEY: Yes COMMISSIONER PARKERSON: Yes COMMISSIONER BENNETT: Yes COMMISSIONER RAHMAN: Yes CHAIRMAN TARR :. Yes COMMISSIONER LIBARLE: Yes COMMISSIONER THOMPSON: Yes P.U.D. Conditions 1. The following site plan issues shall be addressed, subject to approval by the Planning Commission and City Council prior to SPARC review: a. Conformance with City Engineering Department requirements per Tentative Map Conditions 1a, ld, 1e, If, and li. b. Traffic friction points resulting from the uncovered parking spaces serving Lot 14 and Lot 21 shall be addressed. = Fo-PFOVidpae�- tlra- FxflFe- de €eFrs}ble- and -amore- useable €h�-- eStriaA path- betwee�r -lots ��- aid- �- C- �i��l -- lie- eli�i�ra #�d -- �- widerpedest�a� -pa�� 10 387 d. Uncovered parking space for Lot 1 shall be eliminated due to proximity to the driveway entrance. 2. All. aspects of the proposed development plan are subject to review by the Site Plan and Architectural Review Committee ( SPARC) prior to application for Final Map including but not limited to: architecture, public and private landscaping, hardscape surface treatments, irrigation and fencing. Particular emphasis shall be placed on SPARC review of the following: a. Landscaping or other barrier shall be provided along the north side of the playing field area and at the west end of driveway X. b. Evaluation of streetscape landscaping in terms of conformance with the Specific Plan (view corridors, unification /clarification of neighborhood layout, etc.). Landscape plan to provide appropriate street tree species 0 (large and rural in nature), planting frequency at minimum spacing of 20' to 30', toward developing a linear tree -lined appearance, augmented by accent U tree clusters. Street landscape plan shall specify irrigation, street sins, street lighting and mailbox details. Continuity in landscaping between this project, Kingsmill, and Cader Farms shall be provided. Responsibility for streetscape to be borne by the developers of Cader Farms and Kingsmill. C. Design and location of fencing including an evaluation of the need for six - rather than three -foot fencing in some areas for privacy (i.e., units facing common area). d. Variety between the individual units shall be provided through the use of colors, materials, accents, entrance location, roof design, window design, and /or other architectural details. e. Plans submitted for SPARC review shall include adequate detail to evaluate the effectiveness of architectural features. Colors and materials shall be included. f. Enforcement of Corona /Ely Specific Plan minimum structure height and setback standards for properties abutting Sonoma Mountain Parkway. g. All conditions required per approval of the Tentative Map and PUD plan. h. Unit architecture and individual site design for compliance with the intent and requirements of the General Plan and Corona /Ely Specific Plan. 3. All requirements of the Police Department shall be complied with, including: a. Addresses shall be posted at the rear and front of house (lots with detached rear garages). b. Lighting shall be placed along, the private roads that run behind the homes and at the tot lot and common area. C. Solid wooden doors with 1" throw deadbolt shall be provided at both the front and rear. 11 388 4. Individual property owners through Homeowner's Association shall be _responsible for maintenance of the east side of the (Sonoma Mountain Parkway) noise attenuation wall. 5. Occupancy and resale of the individual units shall be subject to income limits established through an "agreement between the City of Petaluma and Burbank Housing Development, Corporation. 6. All landscaping and irrigation systems within the public right -of -way, street tree planting strips landscape me p g p dian /islands shall be maintained by an Assessment e District through contract services, subject to approval of the City Council concurrently with the, approval of the Final Map. Landscaping and irrigation systems within the area shall be designed to standards acceptable to the City of Petaluma. Cost .of formation of the required Assessment District shall' be borne by the project proponent, and shall be assessed at time of Final Map submittal. 7. Timing- of the development, and sales of the residential units is subject to City staff decision relative to Zone 4 Water System and Sonoma Mountain Parkway completion. 8. PUD Development Standards shall be developed, subject to staff review and approval prior to Final Map. to include provisions for governing the following: a. Maximum lot coverage for principal dwellings and accessory uses and structures, definition of specific minimum setbacks, per unit type if appropriate. b. Identification of options and /or restrictions applicable to homeowner's for construction of either building additions, permitted detached accessory structures or associated improvements (decks, patios, spas, etc.). Design shall be in keeping with the approved PUD Development Plan, to staff review and approval prior to issuance of a development permit. C. Standards for height, location and design of fencing, as well as maintenance and replacement provisions to conform to the approved PUD plan. d. Prohibit garage conversion due to limited parking. e. Rebuilding and /or replacement of residential structures shall conform to the approved unit development plan. 9. Proiect CC &R's shall include reference to the PUD Development Standards, subject to staff review and approval prior to Final Map approval. A motion was made by Commissioner Parkerson and seconded by Commissioner Thompson to recommend to the City Council approval of the Tentative Map based on the findings and subject the following amended conditions: COMMISSIONER WOOLSEY: Yes COMMISSIONER PARKERSON: Yes COMMISSIONER BENNETT: Yes COMMISSIONER RAHMAN: Yes CHAIRMAN TARR: Yes COMMISSIONER LIBARLE: Yes COMMISSIONER THOMPSON: Yes Tentative Map Findings 12 389 1. The proposed subdivision, as conditionally approved, together with provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan and Corona /Ely Specific Plan objectives, policies general land uses and programs. 2. The site is physically suitable for the type and density of development proposed, as conditionally approved. 3. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements therefore, as conditionally approved will not cause substantial environmental damage, and no substantial or avoidable injury will occur to fish and /or wildlife or their habitat. 4. The discharge of waste from the proposed subdivision into the existing community (D sewer system will not result in violation of the existing requirements prescribed by 0) the Regional Water Quality Control Board. 5. The Tentative Map provides reasonable access to the proposed lots. F) C) 6. The proposed map, subject to the following conditions, complies with the requirements of the Municipal Code, Chapter 20.16 and the Subdivision Map Act. 7. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not cause public health problems. Tentative Map Conditions 1. All requirements of the City Engineer shall be complied with, including: a. The width of driveways "W" and "Z" shall be a minimum -2-6 12 feet one -way and 26 feet two -way feet face -of -curb to face -of -curb to accommodate emergency vehicular access and two -way traffic with a structural street section adequate to handle a fire truck. b. The developers engineers shall submit hydraulic calculations prior to Final Map approval verifying the adequacy of the 100 -year relief channel capacity, width and design to the satisfaction of the Engineering Department and Sonoma County Water Agency. C. The 100 -year relief swale (located between Lots 20 and 21) shall be dedicated as a private surface drainage easement with maintenance responsibilities by the homeowners association. d. On- street parking shall be eliminated along the approximate frontage of Lots 13, 14, 31, 1, driveway crossing, lower portion of Lot 30 around the curve in Brittania Court, 29, 23, Lot 31, driveway W, 21 and 22. Exact locations shall be determined by the Traffic Engineer. e. The street neck down in Brittania Court at its intersection with Downing Street shall have a minimum face of curb to face of curb width of 28 feet. f. Downing Street and Brittania Court shall be revised to conform to those streets previously approved by the Kingsmill and Cader Farms tentative maps, (i.e., approved street center line radius of 90' adjacent to Lot 29 er Kingsmill and center line radius of 296 adjacent to Lot 1 per Cader Farms g. If positive lot drainage cannot be obtained then all backyard drainage control shall be within an underground pipe system with surface catchment swales and inlets. h. This development is dependent upon utility and street improvements to be installed by adjacent developments. Appropriate calculations shall be 13 submitted to, verify their adequacy. If the public improvements necessary to serve this development have not been approved, and installed bonded for prior to final map approval, of this development, the applicant shall be required to design and bond a-nd4a all these improvements prior to }ssuaueee Q€ er i€icate -o-€` -0e neies final map approval. In any case, the City shall allow no more than 80% of the Certificates of Occupancy for this development until all the required public improvements are accepted by the City. L An emergency turn - around or secondary vehicular access shall be provided at the end. of the driveway crossing. j. If water meters, fire hydrants and street, lights are located outside of the public right -of =way they shall be con_ tained in a 10' exclusive dedicated easement. k. The Wilmington Sewer Pump Station is nearing capacity during wet weather conditions. The proposed five -year capital improvement program includes provisions for expansion of the Wilmington Pump Station to handle proposed development as well as improvements to better serve existing development. This development shall pay a pro-rata share of the costs of these improvements. 1. All utilities located on private property and dedicated to the City for maintenance shall be contained within a 10 -foot exclusive easement, with sanitary sewer and watermains contained within a 10 -foot exclusive paved easement. M. All street lights adjacent to this development shall have standard metal fixtures dedicated to the City for ownership and maintenance. Prior to City acceptance, the developer shall verify all lights meet PG &E's LS2 rating system. n. A one- foot, non- access easement shall be required along Sonoma Mountain Parkway (formerly Ely Boulevard). o. The developer shall comply with the Petaluma Municipal Code Section 20.36.010 and 20.36.020 which require the developer to pay storm drainage impact fees (as calculated in Chapter 17.3) on construction in. all sections of the City of Petaluma. 2. All requirements of the Fire Marshal shall be complied with, including: a. Provide fire alarm system., for all buildings with 3 units or more in accordance with Section 14.104C of the 1988 Uniform Fire Code as amended by the City of Petaluma. . b. Provide smoke detectors in all units on .separate circuits with visual alarm device installed above or near main entry door. C. Each building shall be provided with a strobe light connected to the alarm system to identify which building is' in alarm mode. 3--- - - - --A bus- palleat s hall -be= Provided -}€ e Sri d -b} -t1 -TFa sit C� ©rdix tfx-. 4. All requirements of Pacific Bell and PG &E (as specified in their respective letters dated February 14 and March 5, 1991) shall be complied with 5. All streets providing access to .this development shall be constructed as part of this project, specific timing to approval of city staff. 6. Residential structures located within 64 feet of the Sonoma Mountain Parkway right -of=way shall require an acoustical analysis to verify that structure meets City and State noise standards (45 dBA for all habitable rooms). Additional noise 14 391 attenuation may be necessary. This analysis shall occur prior to SPARC review of architecture. 7. The Tentative Map shall be amended prior to submittal for Final Map review and approval to reflect all applicable modifications required under the PUD conditions of approval. Said map amendment shall meet specifications of the City Engineer and Community Development Director and shall also incorporate any SPARC conditions of - approval periinenf to the map. 8. This development shall be subject to all appropriate development fees, and on and off -site improvements as set forth within the adopted Development Agreement or any subsequent amendment thereto. Co CD 9. Any labeling errors or other erroneous information appearing on the map, O development or landscape plans shall be corrected prior to Final Map approval. 10. The subdivider shall comply with requirements of the public utility agencies and the U City` Department of Public Works, prior to Final Map approval. Q 11. All hazardous materials (as recognized by the City Fire Marshal) utilized on the construction site shall be kept within a fenced, locked enclosure, subject to review and approval of City staff. 12. The applicant /developer shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City or any of its boards, commissions, agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or ,proceeding against the City, its boards, icommissions, agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul, the approval of the tentative /parcel map, when such claim or action is brought within the time period provided for in Section 66499.37: The City shall promptly notify the applicant /developer of any such claim, action, or proceeding. The City shall coordinate fully in the defense. Nothing contained in this condition shall prohibit the City from participating in a defense of any claim, action, or proceeding if the City bears its own attorney's fees and costs, and the City defends the action in good faith. 13. This project is subject to payment of Traffic Impact Fees. 14. Any signs erected to advertise or direct persons to the project shall meet the requirements of the City Sign Ordinance and obtain a sign permit from the City. 45: - - - - - - -efflf Fia-Fy -pi 12ig1�3OFfFig- 3FE) f -fFf - i3 y 6-��G�19ii- E ii tiffs -- --1 he - €e`ne --ing- shall -be ESC- t2f- 3�if3F-�4 ,�i}y $i & E�fAg/ C$ IiS�r�iEi( ii}- s�Ei�i-$fl{�- 313�C-- �O --S�&€ - tF4S3f'E�i4Fi �?FiE}F-t{i -gi$f �fi�g -p(' fini�-i§S� F2E 16. Pad (and corresponding finished floor) elevations shall be as close to natural grade as possible, subject to staff approval. 15 392 PLANNING MATTER V. CITY OF PETALUMA, (pt) 1. Update on Downtown Design Guidelines. Principal Planner Pamela Tuft stated that work continues on the Draft Downtown Design Guidelines. Draft form should be achieved by end of summer, 1991. ADJOURNMENT: 9:30 PM min0409 /pcmin -4 1 I '�