HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 06/04/1991421
SPECIAL, MEETING JUNE 4, 1991
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M.
CITY HALL PETALUMA, CA
CD COMMISSIONERS: Bennett, Libarle, Parkerson, Rahman, Tarr *, Thompson, Woolsey
0) STAFF: Warren Salmons, Community Development Director
Q Kurt Yeiter, Principal Planner
U
* Chairman
PUBLIC COMMENT: (15 minutes maximum).
The Commission will hear public comments only on matters over which they have
jurisdiction. There will be no Commission discussion or action. The chairman will allot no
more than five minutes to any individual. If more than three persons wish to speak their
time will be allotted so that the total amount of time allocated to this agenda item will be
15 minutes.
NEW BUSINESS
PUBLIC HEARINGS
I. PETALUMA MARSH ENHANCEMENT PLAN (ky).
1. Receive and review draft Petaluma Marsh Enhancement Plan (presentation
by Questa Engineering).
�J
Public Hearing was opened.
SPEAKERS:
Jeff Peters, Ouesta Engineering - outlined process to date; spoke of history of study area,
existing qualities, goals and objectives, restoration plan, and funding options.
Margaret Henderson, Ouesta En ineering - described access and recreational alternatives.
Larry Wasem. 5510 Skvlane Blvd., Suite 202 Santa Rosa (Marina Office Park Associates) -
perhaps no. excess parking at marina; objects to path on railroad right -of -way which, he
believes, would render parcel unusable; objects to public access from Casa Grande Road
through upland portion of site; requests that upland /wetland boundary on Darling -
Delaware property be drawn at St. Lands, and that landscaped buffer zones be eliminated
from this property.
The public hearing was closed.
ADJOURNMENT: 8:55 PM
min0604 /pcom14
422
REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL'CHAMBERS
CITY HALL:
COMMISSIONERS: Bennett, Parkerson, Rahman, Tarr*
ABSENT: Libarle, Thompson, Woolsey
STAFF: Pamela Tuft, Principal Planner
Hans Grunt, Planning Technician
* Chairman
MINUTES OF MAY 28, 1991 will be approved at a later date.
JUNE 11, 1991
7:00 P.M.
PETALUMA, CA
PUBLIC COMMENT: Mr. Davlin, 1728 E. Madison, contacted Community Development
staff in .August 1990 regarding Zoning Ordinance with reggard to 20 foot rear °yard setback;
awnings should be allowed to extend into a portion of required rear yards. Principal
Planner Tuft stated that Zoning Ordinance amendments will be on a July agenda and will
include discussion of this subject (Mr. Davlinwill be notified).
DIRECTOR'S' REPORT: None.
COMMISSIONER'S REPORT: None.
CORRESPONDENCE: None.
APPEAL 'STATEMENT: Was read.
1
1
423
NEW BUSINESS
PUBLIC HEARINGS
I. PETALUMA POULTRY PROCESSORS, 2700 LAKEVILLE, AP NO. 005- 040 -40,
FILE NO. CUP91014(hg f ws).
1. Consideration of EIQ.
2. Consideration of a conditional use permit to allow expansion of an existing
food processing facility located within the ML Zoning District.
W The public hearing was opened.
0 SPEAKERS: None.
U
The public hearing was closed.
A motion was made by Commissioner Bennett and seconded by Commissioner- - Rahman to
direct staff to prepare a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact based on
the five findings listed below:
COMMISSIONER WOOLSEY: Absent
COMMISSIONER PARKERSON: Yes
COMMISSIONER BENNETT: Yes
COMMISSIONER RAHMAN'. Yes
CHAIRMAN TARR: Yes
COMMISSIONER LIBARLE: Absent
COMMISSIONER THOMPSON: Absent
Findings
1. The project, as conditionally approved, does not have the potential to degrade the
quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self - sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict
thee range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples
of the major periods of California history or prehistory.
2. The project, as conditionally approved, does not have the potential to achieve short -
term to the disadvantage of long -term, environmental.goals.
3. The project, as conditionally approved, does not have impacts which are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable.
4. The project, as conditionally approved, does not have environmental effects which
will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly.
5. The project is consistent with and further promotes the objectives, goals, and
policies of the General Plan.
A motion was made by Commissioner Bennett and seconded by Commissioner Rahman to
approve a' ,conditional use permit for the expansion of Poultry Processors at 2700 Lakeville,
based on the findings and subject to the following conditions:
424
COMMISSIONER WO.OLSEY- Absent
COMMISSIONER PARKERSON: Yes
COMMISSIONER BENNETT: Yes
COMMISSIONER RAHMAN: Yes
CHAIRMAN TARR: Yes
COMMISSIONER LIBARLE: Absent
COMMISSIONER THOMPSON: Absent
Findings
1. The proposed break room, as conditioned, will conform to the requirements and
intent of the Petaluma Zoning Ordinance.
2. The proposed break room, as conditioned; will conform to the requirements 'and
intent, goals, and policies of the Petaluma General Plan.
3. The proposed break room will not constitute a nuisance or be detrimental to the
public welfare of the community.
Conditions
1. The following requirements of the City Engineering Department shall be met:
a) Petaluma ,Poultry Processors shall participate in the Lakeville Hwy.
b) If necessary Petaluma Poultry Prod improving the roadway.
Assessment District. for widening and
shall provide additional right of
way for the widening of Lakeville Hwy.. The need for and amount of any
additional land will be determined following Cal Trans review and approval
of the Lakeville Hwy. improvement plans.
c) Petaluma Poultry Processors shall pay additional traffic mitigation fees for
the plant addition no later then the issuance date of a certificate of
occupancy.
2. The following requirements of the City Fire Marshal shall be met:
a) Provide one fire extinguisher 2A rated ABC dry chemical type for each 3,000
square feet of floor space.
b) Office and break room shall be protected by an automatic fire extinguishing
system as required by Section 10.306A of the 1988 edition of the Uniform
Building Code.
c) Permit required from Fire Marshal's Office for sprinkler system alteration
prior to work being started. Two, sets of plans are required.
d) No extension cords. All equipment and appliances shall be direct plug in.
e) Provide metal or flame retardant plastic waste cans.
3. The proposed addition shall include a parapet that adequately screens all existing
equipment on the roof abutting the addition and any proposed roof equipment (air-
conditioning etc.) associated with the addition subject to SPARC review and
approval.
4. The overall architectural design and choice of exterior finish, materials of the
addition shall match the existing facilities and shall be determined at the time of
SPARC review.
3
425
5.
Any future additions proposed as reflected in the approved master plan or any
requested changes /additions to the plan by project proponents shall coincide with
parking improvements /additions deemed necessary at such time.
6.
Any portion of the existing perimeter fence that is leaning and /or broken shall be
repaired /replaced with matching materials .prior to issuance of a certificate of
occupancy.
7.
The unplanted portion of the existing landscape median that separates the west
parking lot from the rear of the site shall be replanted prior to issuance of a
CD
certificate of occupancy (see attached site plan). Plant types and locations shall be
reviewed and approved by SPARC.
0)
0 8.
The landscape strip screening the north /east parking lot from view of travelers
along South McDowell Blvd. and west bound traffic on Lakeville Hwy. shall be
0
improved prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy (see attached site plan).
Improvements shall include the removal of weeds and dead plant material as well as
additional plantings to enhance the visual appearance and screening effectiveness of
this portion of landscaping. Plant types and locations shall be reviewed and
approved by SPARC.
9. In addition to improving the existing landscaping along the east property line, a
minimum eight foot wide landscape strip shall be developed along the east fence
line that ties into the existing landscaping and .continues to the rear property line
(see attached site plan). Specific plantings and irrigation details to be approved by
SPARC.' This landscape area shall be developed within twelve months of the date
of approval of this use permit.
10. All special development fees applicable to this facility addition shall be paid. The
community facilities development fee and district school facilities fee shall be
calculated and paid prior to issuance of a building permit.
11. As development occurs on lands west and south of the processing plant, the
planning staff will work to secure additional access through neighboring lands for
truck and employee traffic. When this access is secured, the front entrance shall be
used by trade people only, and all truck and employee traffic will use the new access
to the west or south.
12. In any event, at such time as improvements to Lakeville Hwy. are installed, front
access will become right turn in and out only.
II. FOODMAKER, INC., JACK -IN -THE -BOX, 1401 McDOWELL BOULEVARD .
NORTH, AP NO. 047-360-01, FILE NO. 1.693(tp).
1. Consideration of a conditional use permit to allow construction of a fast -food
restaurant within Redwood Business Park.II PCD Zoning District.
The public hearing was opened and continued until July 9, 1991.
4
426
PLANNING MATTERS
MISCELLANEOUS
Scheduled visit to Country Club Estates 3 visit; discussed schedule and attendance at
October CCAPA conference in Sacramento.
ADJOURNMENT 7:30 PM
min061.1 /pcom14
5