Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 06/25/1991427 CD O 0 REGULAR MEETING Q CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CITY HALL COMMISSIONERS: JUNE 25, 1991 7:00 P.M. PETALUMA, CA Present: Libarle, Parkerson, Rahman,.Tarr *, Thompson, Woolsey Absent: Bennett STAFF: Warren Salmons, Director Pamela Tuft, Principal Planner Jane Thomson, Senior Planning Technician * Chairman MINUTES OF MEETING OF MAY 28, JUNE 4, AND 11, 1991 were approved as written. PUBLIC COMMENT: (15 minutes maximum). DIRECTOR'S REPORT: None. COMMISSIONER'S REPORT: Commissioner Woolsey apologized for auto center sign - did not realize scale of sign. Commissioner Woolsey noted that Council is considering creating a committee for affordable housing and suggested Commissioner Rahman be named to the Committee. CORRESPONDENCE: None. APPEAL, STATEMENT: Was read. 1 HE OLD BUSINESS PUBLIC HEARING'S I. BUFFALO BILLIARDS, 1384 NORTH MCDOWELL, AP NO.. 137 - 011 -12, PARKING AND CIRCULATION PLANS; File No. CUP91008(tp). The public hearing was opened. SPEAKERS: Alan Tilton Answered questions regarding reevaluation of project site; Country West could lose one driveway in the future. Commissioner Tarr Questions regarding future development of corner lot; problems for northbound traffic on McDowell exist now - will first driveway be widened? (Answered by Alan Tilton -yes). Commissioner Parkerson Will turning radius be improved? (Answered by Alan Tilton - yes). The public hearing was closed. A motion was made by Commissioner Parkerson and seconded by Commissioner Thompson to modify Condition No. 1 imposed at the Planning Commission Meeting of April 23, 1991 per staff recommendation. COMMISSIONER WOOLSEY: Yes COMMISSIONER PARKERSON: Yes COMMISSIONER BENNETT: Absent COMMISSIONER RAFIMAN: Yes CHAIRMAN TARR: Yes COMMISSIONER LIBARLE: Yes COMMISSIONER THOMPSON Yes La. The most southerly e*e access driveway along McDowell Blvd. shall be e knii+ated reconstructed to the specifications of the City Traffic Engineer. Lb. Parking layout shall be upgraded in conjunction with any future proposal for shopping center remodel. Parking lot upgrade plan to return to Commission for approval after plan is prepared by City Traffic Engineer; property .owner and proponent. This a�pr© v�rl�s- ��= oce�r- wttlrrx is�anc- e- © €�isi:T��I?er�it. II. LEONARD JAY, COUNTRY CLUB ESTATES III, AP NO.S 008- 472 -04 AND A PORTION OF 008- 472 -06, FILE NO. 11.879 (pt). 1. Continued consideration of Draft Environmental Impact Report for proposed. rezoning of project site from .R -1 6,500 to P.U.D..and Tentative Map for creation of 65 single- family dwelling lots. The applicant requested a continuance to the meeting of July 23, 1991. �1 h 2 429 t The public hearing was opened. SPEAKERS: David Schmidt - 1338 Canyon Drive - Project on Canyon was condemned in 1970's during heavy rains; foundations were destroyed and project had -to be redesigned. Steve Costners - 1322 Canyon Drive - Was not noticed prior to this meeting; more people should be notified; does not feel hill is stable; project should be lower density on unstable areas. Craig Glen - 1027 Rancho Lindo Drive - Has had trouble selling home because of plans for (0 project; the process should be speeded up. Vern Smith - 1318 Canyon Drive - When home was purchased one year ago - no one O informe&him of project; the mailing list should be updated; redesign cannot be achieved in one month; from a planning standpoint each phase should be substantially complete before another phase can begin; concerns with soil stability on Canyon Drive. U Mattie Cloud - 1007 Phillips - Many serious questions raised by EIR; any project on this Q ridgeline would be detrimental to community; the "no project" alternative and acquisition as a park would be the desired alternative; preserve as open space. Bonnie Thomas - 29 Steven Drive - Toxic waste and trash has been dumped into the creek from existing construction on Country Club Estates project; there are sewer pipes, hay bales, etc. pushed into creek; people are dumping in this area; strongly opposed to project because of sensitive environment; property owner should clean site. Steve Parsons - 1100 Mountain View - beautiful area - would hate to see area built on; wants area saved for next generation. Jack Weddele - 1319 Canyon Drive - opposed to irresponsible land management in area; not opposed to development, but not irresponsible development; soil unstable; slope instability °very, real; does developer have"resources to do, an adequate job? "Just say no!" Steve Weisler - 1043 Rancho Lindo Drive - Developer should not be allowed to do any grading; 70 acres of mud could be very serious. Vern Smith - 1318 Canyon Drive - Hillside soil stability must be established before project can continue; understands that there have been several geotechnical reports unfavorable to this project - if so they should be brought'forward. Lewis Larsen - 505 Lyons Court - Will public be allowed to speak regarding allotments? This public hearing was continued to the Planning Commission meeting of July 9th to establish'ihe date to which the hearing will be formally continued. NEW BUSINESS PUBLIC HEARINGS III. WESTSIDE SHELL, 421 WASHINGTON STREET, AP NO. 006 - 361 -32, FILE NO. CUP910150kt). 1. Consideration of amendment to conditional use permit to allow expansion of an existing convenience market from 250 sq.ft. to 692 sq.ft. The public hearing was opened. SPEAKERS: R 4 0 Ken Giffin - applicant - discussed' with neighbor (Mrs. Anderson) location of phones - she indicated to him that phones in their present location would be acceptable with the planned fence; basically agreed with staff report as. written. Commissioner Parkerson - asked questions regarding parking layout. The public hearing was closed. A motion was made. by Commissioner Thompson and seconded by Commissioner Libarle to amend the conditional use permit for Westside Shell based on the findings and subject . to the conditions listed below: COMMISSIONER WOOLSEY: yes COMMISSIONER PARKERSON: yes COMMISSIONER BENNETT: absent COMMISSIONER RAHMAN: yes CHAIRMAN TARR: yes COMMISSIONER LIBARLE: yes COMMISSIONER THOMPSON: yes Findings: 1. This service station has been long established and used by neighborhood residents without adverse effects and is therefore permitted by public convenience and necessity. 2. The service station with a 692 square foot convenience market use is in accord with the objectives of the Zoning, Ordinance and the purposes of protecting and servicing the commercial center in the Central Commercial district in which the site is located. As conditioned, the station and proposed convenience market will conform to, the requirements and intent of the Petaluma Zoning Ordinance Section 21 -403 ( "Special Standards and considerations Governing Particular Uses"). 3. The service station with a 692 square foot convenience market, as conditioned, will conform to the requirements and intent, goals, arid. policies of the Petaluma General Plan. 4. The service station with 692 square foot convenience market will not constitute a nuisance or be detrimental to the public welfare of the community. 5. An environmental review was done in conjunction with the Use Permit, approved by Planning Commission 4/9/91; further environmental review is required. Conditions 1. The most northerly " driveway on Howard Street shall be eliminated, and replaced with curb, gutter and sidewalk to City specifications before any building permits may be issued for expansion of the convenience market. Applicant shall close driveway (at minimum on an _interim basis). within 45 days of Use Permit approval. Interim closure subject to staff review and approval. This condition, shall not be seen as a way to circumvent permanent closure. (See also Condition 14). 2. This project shall be subject to SPARC review, with particular emphasis on the following: 0 .rhb�. F.iti ?•_v�er_..iy;� .r T ?= i!Ua " 431 a. A revised landscape plan to include additional landscaping at property lines, and the extension and possible expansion of landscaping at the corner of Howard and Washington Streets. b. Lighting of the service station and proposed convenience market. C. Signs shall comply with all provision of the City Sign Ordinance. d. Trash enclosure shall comply with all City Standards. e. Parking shall comply with all City Standards. f. Fencing locations and design. g. All outside display shall be eliminated (with the exception of maximum 4 newspaper boxes, and 1 ice machine). 3. Parking stalls shall be striped for a total of seven (7) stalls, subject to staff review CD and approval. o 4. Existing fencing and asphalt shall be repaired /replaced as deemed necessary by staff within 45 days of Use Permit approval. Additional fencing (subject to staff review and approval) to be provided around west side of service station building in U order to preclude access by other than employees of the service station. 5. Delivery of petroleum and convenience market products shall be limited to the hours of 12 A.M. to 12 P.M. (midnight to noon). 6. At no time shall future business activities exceed Petaluma Zoning Ordinance Performance Standards as set forth in Section 22 -301, or use conditions as set forth in Section 21 -403. 7. No storage of any type shall take place outdoors (with the exception of the newspaper vending machines and the ice machine). There shall be no storage or sale of vehicles on the site; no outdoor auto repair or storage or display of tires, and no portable or moveable display racks shall be permitted on the exterior grounds; no parking lot vendors. 8. Telephone booths (2 maximum) shall be permitted to remain at present location 9. This use permit may be recalled to the Planning Commission at any time due to complaints regarding objectionable operating characteristics. At such time, the Commission may add or modify conditions of approval. 10. Any requests to expand the convenience market shall be considered as an amendment to this Use Permit and shall be referred to the Planning Commission for review. 11. All work within the public right -of -way requires an excavation permit from the Department of Public Works. 12. No sale of alcoholic beverages is permitted. 13. All conditions of the Fire Marshal shall be complied with, including: a. Any remaining hazardous material or residue shall be cleaned and properly disposed of. 14. All conditions of the City Engineer shall be complied with, including: 5 6 a. Driveway on Howard Street closest to Washington Street must be closed to City Standards within 45 days of approval. of Use Permit. 15. All .conditions of the Sonoma County Public Health Agency shall be. complied with, including: a. Prior to issuance of building permits and before any continuing use, obtain approval of Sonoma- County Public Health;, contact Bob Herr_, 525 -6544. b. A Public Health annual permit is required. IV. CITY OF PETALUMA, ZONING ORDINANCE (ws). 1. Consideration of Negative Declaration 2. Consideration of Zoning Ordinance Text Amendments a) Director and Environmental Design Plan Terminology b) Riverfront /Warehouse District Boundaries c) Historic District d Detached Accessory Structures /Buildings e� Patios, Decks and Guesthouse Setbacks f) Projections into Front Setbacks g) Planning Commission Zoning,, Ordinance Voting h) Valuation of Non -- Conforming Structures i) Dwelling Groups j PUD and Growth Management k) Indemnification Requirements 1) Residential Uses in Commercial Zones m) Application and Procedural Requirements in the P.U.D. Zone n) Residential Fence Setback Requirements (Items k,l,m and n were not presented at this meeting - they will be presented at the Planning Commission meeting of July 9.). The public hearing was opened. SPEAKERS: None. The public hearing was continued to the Planning Commission meeting of July 9. A motion was made by Commissioner Libarle and seconded by Commissioner Parkerson to approve a Negative .Declaration based on the findings in the staff report. COMMISSIONER WOOLSEY- Yes COMMISSIONER PARKERSON: Yes COMMISSIONER BENNETT- Absent COMMISSIONER RAHMAN: Yes CHAIRMAN TARR Yes COMMISSIONER LIBARLE: Yes COMMISSIONER T14OMPSON: Yes Findings G 10 JF;1 )I r 1. The project, as conditionally approved, does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. 2. The project, as conditionally approved, does not have the potential to achieve short- term to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals. 3. The project, as conditionally approved, does not have impacts which are individually li rMted, but cumulatively considerable. 0) 0 4. The project, as conditionally approved, does not have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. C) 5. The project is consistent with and further promotes the objectives, goals, and policies of the General Plan. A motion was made by Commissioner Libarle and seconded d by Commissioner Thompson to recommend adoption of Zoning Ordinance amendments as suggested by staff and incorporating the following changes discussed by Planning Commission: 1. Wording change to Section 21-201.1a. 2. Wording change to Section 25-405. 3. Wording change to Section 17-506.1. 4. Creation of new Section (21-201.4). COMMISSIONER WOOLSEY: Yes COMMISSIONER PARKERSON: Yes COMMISSIONER SIONER BENNETT:'Absent COMMISSIONER RAHMAN: Yes CHAIRMAN TARR: Yes COMMISSIONER LIBARLE: Yes COMMISSIONER THOMPSON: Yes Addition = underline - Deletion = sifti-keouts REOUES A. Up until 1987 when the City's new General Plan _was adopted, the City used two primary planning documents; the General Plan and the Environmental Design Plan. In various places in the Zoning Ordinance, references are- made to General Plan or Environmental Design Plan. Wherever references are made to the term 'Environmental Design Plan', those should be deleted and replaced with 'General Plan'. B. Director is a term that is defined by the Zoning Ordinance as the department head Who , is designated by the City Manager to administer zoning for the City of 7 434 Petaluma. In the Ordinance there are references to both Planning. Director and Community Development Director. These references should be uniformly revised to simply read 'Director'. - RIVERFRONT WAREHOUSE; ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARY 1. Delete Section 19 -5.200 District Boundaries - ben�aFies -�f- -- the-- IZi�e�-���t-- �a�r�l}ouse- �aF} in g- I�tFiet-- a�-e -- sit- #ort� - -a� $ egiru }i�g- �t- the_n��ecti�- o-€�eefl�- street end- ����t�- eet;.����oe�eding3� -a �er�ea�erlydi€ eetio-F��leng "�3'��- t�- eet�c�- €h��?�ta1�F�- Riper; :they= prec- �ed�g� -a s© they eri - diFee€ ion - c�11 3g= --cer teFl} - -o€- � -:I' €aka a-- R-iye+ -4-e--the east�Fst- pFOgeF�li� © €- A.�es�or- 'S- I?a�el - N�ber- -0094- 3- 1- t��- �roe- eedi�g XFr-a th es€e� ,.. = f dire E�� ©Fr- to- -th -e- S©x�eFnm ©St' PF4per� -4Re -4 AssessoF's -Pagel ' , StFeet - {��t -met - - ire- l�di�g- }�FOpeFties -o-x � 4ack- 104he-poin��€= begiFintxg Aga -lap HISTORIC DISTRICTS 1. Amend Section 17 -501.1 to read as follows: Exterior alterations:_ except as determined 2. Amend Section 17- 501.2 to read as follows: Exterior alterations that would affect the exterior of a designated landmark or structure within a designated historic district exc as determined - by the Director to be of a minor nature, which alterations would than. be subject to administrative review and approval. 3. Amend Section 17 -501.3 to read as follows: Construction of any type on a landmark site or within a historic district of a type which affects the exterior appearance of the site, unless exempted by the designating ordinance. or excent as determined by the hi'rertnr fn he of a minnr natiira tv}h t . 4. Delete Section 17 -505: I3ee- i�ioF}-- ttrxe- li��ta�c�rt: - the- t�r�c- a�dt�r�l �'- rese�a�i ©Fri- o�FF�t -te� -ate ree ©g ad- histfx- ic- �rese�v tiari- c�rga i�a €ions - aid -3r}- ases� -a �eting -oomm £ l pFOpert3; the a€€ee�ed- busines��omm�it}- aid- sball�sc- e- r- tairretl�e� th�PFOposed w© Fly eQfff���s - t ©- this- a��i- cle-- aFx- i- �it�- t�- pt - © €- the- de�}gF�alir}g�r� }Ftane� - Hist- orie -- aid - tr I- -FFe�e atioFr- FFHtt�� -tea Il - c e -� - -the a plieatrori - wit iiFr -QF�e- h r�dr�d- veFrt - {) � - dam - €few - the --€ili g -o€- -,camp4ete a�pi�a�ioi }�tl} the- �pa�tFne�t� €- E ©F�tx3i��e�tel ©p�xeFrt -. 5. Delete Section 17 -506: 0 U 1 W Si�s�eFFded-- actiaii: -- ��- oht�rFr�tr€€ieieiit- ���e - -€o�- steps- hec- e�sa�}- t�- �Fese�v� -the same- t-ure; - ar- -a Fea- eeiieeFned 4ie HisteFje -&Fx1- Eeltw- ai- BFeseiwat- ioit- -emmA4ee Fad, - Feeemmeod- -a-Rd -- the - - -F aFFFFi g- E FFri�si -- ma} - -su eFid -- etiQFr-- en - -eF� aplteatioii -t ©- permit- c�iisti�ietloir - alteFat}oF} - deFFxl�t }ori FeQVI - €o -a--period no t- -to-- e- xeee-d- pie-- huodFed-- eig*. {- 150} --d y&.-- -=F- he-- Cotrxci -FFra ; b;} -r�so iorf e�teiid the �ttspeFisiOri- for- Fi addttroii�€- peFi© d- Ftot-- to-e�cc�d- o-ae- dtmdFed- �igh�r f �0� -dais �€ die- FesolutioF} -is-- adapted -eo-t- amore- tl�a�- Fri33e�- E`�}d�vs- �F�d- i}at -less- G© FFHii}ttee- gi -R-al-one 4iti- ndred-eight�{ 1$9) &Fie -- and- L--u4i iFa1 P+eseivati©Fi Tese rvati4Fi-- 4FgaFi�zatio ns -and atheF- e- Ve- gFOUPs;- pW3 Ile - age acIeS-,- &Fxt- ifAeTesteE�- ertrzeFis- make- -Fe&ammer}datio*s €o-F- oego-isi-tion- ef- pfepeFty - -b - �trblie - ©F- ��tate -i3odi es- er-- ageF�cie� --e loge -the pessi�ilit}�o€ ifiOViFrg -© Fie - of -ir} ore- �tFt1C�t1 -F£fr ot�eF- feU. €FrFes - amid- to #eai}y- otl}eF Fea anabi�- xea�Ures:-- I#-et- the- e�c�iF�tx�ri - © €- tile- siispe�iswn- period Rio -no riati e acts - Iias beeFr- t- ak�rt-- by-- €h� - -�- its}-- E© tx3e�l-- oF-- �iaxiiiFtg-- E ©Frii�ssiaFr- �t - -tlie Fee© FFimei3dat3oFr-- o€-- ti} e--- ��isttirie-- aiid-- L- �iitFrFal--- RFeser�ati ©Fr-- EoF�ittee -- -Ilia a�1Fea�ioi}�hall -be pr- ec�ssed�ttlioirt- €Uit�eF -delay , Add new Section 17 -506: economic vitality of the community. DETACHED ACCESSORY BUILDING OR STRUCTURE DEFINITION Applications for demolition permits where the Director determines that the 1. The structure is of historical /cultural significance when listed on a local, 43C Amend Section 1 -203 - Definitions of the City of Petaluma Zoning Ordinance to add: Detached Accessory Building or Structure - A detached accessory building-or structure, except as,. provided in Section 21-207.1, shall maintain a minimum separation from a primary structure or'building of at least three feet For p urposes of measurement, roof eaves and-overhangs—bays, balconies and other projections shall be considered points of reference. PROJECTIONS INTO FRONT YARD SETBACKS Amend Section 24- 401.3 to read as follows: An A uncoered stair, unenclosed porch and any necessary landings, may project ,a distance not to, exceed six (6) feet idto a required front yard, provided such stair and landing, except for a railing, shall not extend above the floor level of the first floor of the building. PATIOS, DECKS AND GUEST HOUSES Section 2 -1 -201 STANDARDS AND CONSIDERATIONS FOR CERTAIN ACCESSORY USES 21 -201 Accessory buildings and structures may be :attached to the main building or may be erected as a separate building. When an accessory building; or structure is - attached to amain building, it shall conform to all .structural and yard requirements of the main building except patios . and decks per 21- 201.1f All accessory buildings shall be included in calculating total lot coverage. 21- 201.1 Detached accessory buildings or structures shall conform to the following regulations as to their locations upon the lot: a. Detached accessory buildings or structures may not be located in the required front yard..of a main building except patios allowed under- Section 21 -201 Detached accessory buildings maybe located in required side or rear yards, rovided that in the aggregate no more than five hundred (500) square feet or ten percent (10 %) of `the area of the required yards, whichever is greater, shall be covered by such structures and provided that on a reversed corner lot, an accessory structure shall not be located closer to the rear property line than the width of the required side yard on the adjoining key lot, and. not closer to the side property line adjoining the street than the required front yard on the adjoining key lot. Ne- wtwtnFe-- shad -be Eletaefted- � -t-e�- the•- n�f�- st�etdre- aid- t��nted- �s- �- de�el3ecl ace-es sary ---- 4Fuetufe-- --fog -- the - -- purp ose - -o--- nv©idi -ng - --yate requireffients. b. In the case of an interior lot abutting upon two (2) or more streets, no accessory building shall be erected or altered so as 10 .a: w4 �r4��1��; �`�, .:ffi;1}'.i't5:4 i.�x: � "•t:. 427 to encroach upon the front one - quarter (1/4) of the lot nearest either street. C. In the case of a corner lot abutting upon two (2) streets, no accessory, building shall be erected or altered so as to project beyond the front yard required on any adjacent lot, nor shall it be located closer to either street line than the main building constructed on the lot. d. A detached accessory building shall maintain a four (4) foot side yard, except that a one (1) story detached accessory building not more than (10) feet in height which- is- mw- e -thafl (D mainilir}gs- atljaen� -1 ©ts, and which does not adjoin the (3) front half of any adjacent lot, need only maintain a three (3) O foot side yard in either of the following cases: Q 1. If it is situated entirely within the rear twenty-five (25) U feet of the lot. 2. If it is more than seventy-five (75) feet from the street on which the main building fronts. e. No detached accessory building shall be within five (5) feet of the rear of the lot line. 21 -201.2 Guest house accessory buildings sha44- -not- be- c4oser -4hai -- twenty - {20) €eet- to- -tl�e- ears#- point - ©€ -fie- amain- {�trilding shall contain Nno kitchen or cooking facilities . shall -be- er-rAilted�- aa� otrse. A guest house may not be closer to any Property lines than permitted for an accessory, building as herein permitted &pr4nc4p9 -bu ding -- , 9n4he S*FAe lc-t: Add the following Section: 21 -201.4 eaves. PLANNING COMMISSION VOTE FOR ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS 27 -402 Action by the Planning Commission at conclusion of hearing If, at the conclusion of the hearing, the Planning Commission shall find the amendment to be in conformance with the Petaluma General Plan a-n _.any_app}}EU.b4e_ -E.nvk-enmental_ -Design -P}a:n, and consistent with the public necessity, convenience, and general welfare, it may recommend amendment of this ordinance. The recommendation shall be by resolution of the Planning Commission carried by the affirmative votes of axe- �x- e -+h &n a majority of the total members present including any disqualified to vote for reason of conflict of interest. €ailere�r€ s�rclr a- res© k�tlen- t- €heeEessay- n € €irr�ative votes - shall -be- deemed- to-be -a- denial o€ tl�pplie�ti Denial of an application shall in all cases, except an amendment initiated by the 11 4118 City Council,, terminate the :proceedings unless such decision is appealed to the City Council as `approved below. VALUATION OF NON - CONFORMING STRUCTURES 25 -405.A non - conforming structure which is damaged by fire, flood, or act of God to an extent exceeding fifty. (5.0) percent of its value, as determined by the-­ Gountyz-mA'sse-&saF a methodology based on comparable restored or reconstructed except in s as will conform to the regulations situated. DWELLING GROUPS 1. >v the Director shall not be ch a manner and for such a use for the district in which it is Amend Section 21 -400 by deleting Sections 21- 402.2 through 21 -402.4 as follows: 21- 492: 2 -------- Ealr d11rF�g- }r�i�greup- shall - €rd�i €leer- -en -�, �tFeet; ©F -other per a e pea -fie e - k i) - be -at- least- €i €ty4-5 Q)- €eet4a —eyeiy d�ex�ion�e4edrxg- tl�e- �egeiFed- fro��a��: 2 492:3- - - - - -- - he- betwee-n-pf4ft i— 1-buildir}g44-n- be4ess- tha-H4tho,a grega €e -side - yards- -re"4r © - atljoieing- lots -fir 44 -d st i t -3x�- which - #1 dista-nees- betwee-R- t?FiFicieal-buildine& -ai i- .t4-4 located}; 2 1- 492.4-- - - - - -- thir��ty -(f a} €eet -o€ feet- AvWe --€o - an- ggFeg t t c� d velk gs -a het- letias € =t errty- E}� feet-wide- 4&r- 1rr-ee -or- more - Beings - -'I e-dry fling -g i ps -sha be witlrix- v� -1 dFed- {�OOMeet =rne strFed -nk g tie- FOule- of- yehiculaf aeeess�- €FOx3- ��txblie�treet: 21- 402.52 In a R -1 District no more than three (3)' dwelling units shall be erected in a dwelling group. 21- 402.63 All development plans submitted under this provision re,quire� site plan approval, in accordance with the provisions of Section 26.401: 21- 402.74 Except as modified. in this section, a dwelling group, shall .conform' to all the requirements of this ordinance for the district in which it is to be located. PUD PROCESS AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 1 Delete Section 19A-40.0-and subparagraphs A through D as follows: 12 439 • • n see�i aF}; -�-e� k�Fa -i ss}c��- €�F -��e� �}ca- �-- Fe��er� -s #�a��- �e- �eeessa � -owl 13 �ea�- �a��eFr�e�� -Fx �ede�ig� -ef ��e�- 3�ri�-- De��o��eF�-- ���FF•- d�- e- k��Frges h. M to- x�odel- tomes- w#�ic#�- a��eet- ?4�o-tar- amore -o €- the- ddveu -io �- un}t�- }� -t-he pFOjee�- V. PLANNING MATTER- Appointment of. representatives for South Petaluma Blvd. Specific Plan Coordinating Committee. Commissioners. Parkerson and Thompson were appointed. ADJOURNMENT 9 :50 PM min0625 -jabt 14