HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council/PCDC Minutes 02/08/20101
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
February 8, 2010
R L U City of Petaluma, California
MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL/
PETALUMA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
Y85a
City Council/PCDC Minutes
Monday, February 8, 2010
Special Meeting
MONDAY, FEBRUARY 8, 2010
CLOSED SESSION - 5:00 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER - CLOSED SESSION - 5:00 P.M.
A. Roll Call
Present: Teresa Barrett; David Glass; Mike Harris; Mike Healy; David Rabbitt;
Tiffany Ren6e; Pamela Torliatt
Absent: None
Vol. 45, Page 99
• CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS: Pursuant to California Government Code §54957.6. Agency
Designated Representatives: Pamala Robbins and John Brown. Employee Organization: Unit 10 -
Petaluma Safety Mid -Management Association.
• CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION: Subdivision (a) of California Government
Code §54956.9: Regency Centers Corporation v. City of Petaluma, Sonoma Superior Court No. SCV
246634
• CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION: Initiation of litigation pursuant to
subdivision (c) of California Government Code §54956.9: 1 potential case.
PUBLIC COMMENT ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS
None.
ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION
MONDAY, FEBRUARY 8, 2010
EVENING SESSION - 6:00 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER - EVENING SESSION -,61M 6:12 P.M.
A. Roll Call
Present: Teresa Barrett; David Glass; Mike Harris; Mike Healy; David Rabbitt;
Tiffany Ren6e; Pamela Torliatt
Absent: None
Vol. 45 Page 100
2
3
4
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
B. Pledge of Allegiance
Marty Bennett, Sebastopol
C. Moment of Silence
February 8, 2010
AGENDA CHANGES AND DELETIONS - Changes to current agenda only.
None.
REPORT OUT OF CLOSED SESSION - Actions Taken
None.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Jim Becker, Petaluma, told Council the City was headed toward bankruptcy if it doesn't
become more "business friendly."
Jerry Price, Petaluma, said that the Council majority wants to do the best that they can for the
citizens of Petaluma; they have his full support, and he admires them greatly. He said
the Council is charged with getting the best deal they can from the developers.
Wayne Clark, Petaluma, spoke about a fundraiser "To Haiti with Love" to be held February 18.
Participating restaurants are donating 10% of their sales, and the Mystic Theater is putting on a
show. He also spoke about his displeasure with Sonoma County Supervisors Kelly and Kerns. He
added that the City Council is under attack for trying to protect the City from a developer who
does not want to follow the General Plan.
Richard T. Giddins, Sr., Petaluma, said he is one of the "original Petaluma four." He inquired
about when the flood fix will be finished.
John Cheney, Petaluma, spoke about the homeless area in Cedar Park behind the homes. He
didn't say anything for awhile, but lately they've been firing off guns so now he's asking for help.
Zen Destiny, Petaluma, thanked the Council for their service. He also stated that "we need new
constitutional tender." (Activated at 00:18:14)
Katherine Bobrowski, Petaluma, thanked Mayor Torliatt for finally having police officers driving
through her mobile home park regularly. She further said that somebody was pushing her and
she called police. They were there within three minutes.
Bill Phillips, Petaluma Tomorrow, Petaluma, spoke about Fair Political Practices Commission
(FPPC) Form 460 and allegations that Council Member David Rabbitt's submitted forms contain
errors.
Matt Maguire, Petaluma, reminded the audience that the current sitting Council majority was
not the majority when the Silk Mill project failed. He also noticed that there are a lot of city
employees at the meeting tonight and he commended them for speaking tonight. He further
stated that he was uncomfortable with individuals with a fiscal stake in the local economy who
don't live in town, particularly the police and fire unions.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
February 8, 2010
Vol. 45, Page 101
David Keller, Petaluma, spoke about his article on Dutra's "magic show and con -game" in
Thursday's Argus -Courier.
Janice Cader-Thompson, Petaluma, said that for Jim Becker to imply that it's Council's fault that
investors in the original project proposed for the Silk Mill lost money is wrong.
COUNCIL COMMENT
Mayor Torliatt
Council Member Renee
Vice Mayor Glass
Council Member Rabbitt
1. PUBLIC HEARING
A. Resolution 2010-021A N.C.S. Certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report; a
Resolution 2010-021 B N.C.S. Making Findings and Adopting a Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Program and Statement of Overriding Considerations
and Resolution 2010-021 C N.C.S. Approving a Vesting Tentative Map for the
Proposed East Washington Place Project Located at East Washington Street and
Highway 101; APNs 007-031-001, 007-241-002, 007-251-001, 007-473-040.
(Bradley/Farmer) - Continued from the January 25, 2010 Council Meeting.
Derek Farmer, Contract Planner
Ryan Nickelson, Regency Centers Corporation
Mayor Torliatt
Mr. Nickelson
Judy Davidoff, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP, Attorneys at Law, San
Francisco
Vice Mayor Glass
Ms. Davidoff
Mayor Torliatt
Ms. Davidoff
Council Member Healy
Mr. Nickelson
Council Member Healy
Mr. Nickelson
Vol. 45 Page 102 February 8, 2010
2 Public Comment on Item I.A
3
4 Chip Rees, Petaluma, said that he has been observing the course of the project
5 since he moved here 4.5 years ago. He did not think this project is ready and
6 asked the Council to please get it to a place of balance.
8
Marty Bennett, Co -Chair, Living Wage Coalition Instructor at Santa Rosa Junior
9
College, spoke in opposition to the project and urged the Council to not accept
10
and certify the EIR and the site map. He did not believe that the Council had
11
sufficient information to determine if the project conforms to CEQA and the
12
General Plan. He asked that the Council request a supplemental EIR.
13
project, but asked for a clear and straight -forward process for development
14
Carol Eber, Petaluma, Chair of Petaluma Aquatics Advisory Board, said that the
15
Board appreciates Regency's cooperation and willingness to work with the City
16
and the Aquatics Board on resolving issues of concern in the EIR that pertain to
17
the swim center
18
independent analysis that adequately addresses the long term implications on
19
Patrick Gehrke, Petaluma, stated that he represented the Coalition of Petaluma
20
Employees (COPE) which encompasses the majority of City employees and
21
addressed Petaluma's financial situation. He stated that all employees agreed to
22
a pay -cut in order to save jobs and to give the Council time to bring in additional
23
revenue to the City. He further stated that he was not endorsing any particular
24
project, but asked for a clear and straight -forward process for development
25
within the city.
26
businesses; that make investments for long term economic health, and real local
27
Dave Libchitz, Petaluma, stated "no on the proposed lot split, it's not in our best
28
interests, period." Further, he stated that neither the current plan nor the FEIR
29
includes Friedman Brothers in the project and must be addressed before moving
30
forward.
31
Petaluma.
32
Kelly Rajala, Director of Sonoma County Go Local Cooperative, Sonoma
33
County, stated that the most vibrant communities are the ones that support local
34
businesses; that make investments for long term economic health, and real local
35
innovation. A project like this will have a disproportionately large impact on
36
independent locally owned businesses. Requested that the Council conduct an
37
independent analysis that adequately addresses the long term implications on
38
wages, impact on existing local businesses and the economic and urban decay
39
impacts resulting from increased vacancy rates.
40
41
Colin MacKenzie, Petaluma, stated that he has watched this Council, the majority
42
of whom he voted for, put this project off over and over again. He said that he
43
and his wife are both elderly and do not drive and have to take the bus to go
44
shopping. Further he said that both he and his wife would like to see a Target in
45
Petaluma.
46
47
Brent Russell, Petaluma, said that he is a small business owner, a member of the
48
Chamber of Commerce, a citizen and the parent of three teenagers. He thought
49
it would be a lot greener to shop in town. He said that the process that Regency
50
has had to go through is excruciating. Further, he stated he hoped the Council
51
would look at the big picture and approve this project
52
February 8, 2010
Vol. 45, Page 103
1 Lisa Sizemore, Petaluma, spoke in support of the Regency project. She said
2 that 330 families are part of National Little League and they really appreciate
3 Regency's plan to build new fields for them
4
5 Zen Destiny, Petaluma, objected to the notion that all the property in this town
6 "belongs to a hypothetical collective that we have to continually grove/ to in
7 order to get anything done." Further he objected to the long, drawn out
8 obstructionist process.
10
Monica Soiland, Midstate Construction, Petaluma, resident for 40 years in
11
Petaluma. She said it appears that the majority of the citizens of Petaluma want
12
the project. Further she said that it appears that Regency wants to work with the
13
City and the community. She asked the Council to approve the tentative map
14
and EIR in good faith.
15
16
Roger Nelson, Midstate Construction, Petaluma, said that two years ago, 50% of
17
their volume was retail. This year it will be 5%. In terms of timing, it's true that a
18
process should not be hurried to the detriment of the final result. But it is also true
19
that things do not remain static in the development world. He thinks Target will
20
bring jobs, a diverse shopping experience and would be a good addition to the
21
community.
22
23
Janice Cader-Thompson, Petaluma, thanked the Council for weathering through
24
this experience. She stated that this is a design that we want to be able to live
25
with and the developer sounds like they are coming around and maybe it's time
26
to move forward. She would like to make sure Friedman's is part of this
27
project. Further, she thought it is unrealistic of people to say this project will fix our
28
economic woes as there are unfunded liabilities relating to public safety
29
employees' retirement.
30
31
Barry Bussewitz, Petaluma, stated that he has read the EIR and submitted
32
comments. He thanked the Council for their responses and urged them to please
33
continue to do your best.
34
35
Dale Axelrod, Petaluma, does not support the project. He provided a Power
36
Point presentation which was an analogy with "Mr. Regency" and partner "Ms.
37
Target.
38
39
Zander Robb, Petaluma, applauded the Council's diligence in not "rubber
40
stamping" every new development that comes screaming down the pipe. He
41
said "we have no guarantee on what we are going to get."
42
43
Cynthia Rathkey, Petaluma, said that this has become sort of a "yes Target - no
44
Target argument" when it should be more of a "what kind of a Target should it
45
be." She believed the project could be a lot nicer and user friendly fitting in to
46
Petaluma's image and not look like every other town in America that has a
47
Target.
48
49
Wayne Clark, Petaluma, said that the project has to be "done right." He wants
50
"smart growth" and wants to "go local." He supports a living wage and said "I've
51
got to have a Friedman Brothers in there."
52
Vol. 45 Page 104
February &20lU
1 Moniz Franco, Petaluma, said "at the very least, this BRshould include otraffic
2 analysis which shows usthe real impacts and their associated air quality
3 impacts." She believed there ioomajor inconoistencyin|heBRthotmokosthose
4 impacts significantly understated.
Richard Brawn, Petaluma, said that the City bfacing coming up with $200 million
for Rainier inthe next 20 years. Hmsaid "Rainer isnot going hohappen; weare
going to be stuck with East Washington."
10
J]LWick, The Construction CpoOthxn' Petaluma, said that he listens hothe
11
communities in which we work by reviewing their general plans and finding out
12
where tuput homes, stores urbusinesses. For the former Kenilworth site in
13
Petaluma, that's mixed use. Please tells uswhat you want 10 build, and vvewill
14
build it.
IS
16
Onita Pellegrini, CEO, Petaluma Area Chamber ofCommerce, Petaluma, spoke in
17
support ofthe project. She further requested that the Council fast track the
18
project and put all of our energies and time into getting this up and running.
19
IO
Todd Tamura, Petaluma, stated that this project beenarounda|onghmeondm
21
lot ofroadblocks have been put inthe way. Further, hesaid the FBAwas
22
expensive but didn't offer any useful information. It is not o "crystal ball" and we
23
cannot know exactly what isgoing tohappen. Please make odecision.
24
25
Jeff Mayne, Petaluma, stated his attendance tonight isus an individual. He
26
spoke isinfavor ofproject. Heisfmdro|edbyvvonhnAtho"beddeo/pn»s/h/efov
27
the town" and maybe the passion for that having onoverriding affect where we
28
may beasking too much.
29
30
Ray Johnson, Petaluma, said that hmsupports Target wholly. Hmvoiced his
31
concern about attracting business tothis town. Hestated onexample ofo
32
company that wanted |oexpand 1oCalifornia and did some research. They
33
found that there are three cities in California that no business should try to move
34
to because they are almost impossible 10deal with. He said, "M/e'vegot fo
]G
change the othfude."
]6
37
Rick Obendorfer'said the problem was that in2U04Regency bought property in
38
good faith with the idea that they were going to be ob|o to develop it into o
39
shopping center. He asked the Council to please approve the tentative map and
40
BRinnighi
41
42
AAayprTod|aU
43
44
Manuel Mendes, Petaluma, has lived in Petaluma for 40 years. He is unemployed
45
and for the Living Wage Coalition |otell him that heisbetter off being
46
unemployed with no medical insurance than he would be making rninirnunn
47
wage, iscrazy.
48
49
Debra Lamar, Petaluma, spoke in favor ofthis project. She does not think this will
50
hurt local businesses. If she's going out of town to shop then she's going to hit all
51
the stores inthe same area. Further she stated there are individuals who are
52
willing totake lower paying jobs.
February 8, 2010
Vol. 45, Page 105
2 Mary Glardon, Petaluma, stated that she has a background in corporate retail
3 management. She applauded Council for staying the course. She believed
4 the problem, the polarization in this city, is not with the Council, but with the
5 developer. Further, she stated "We are asking this developer to give us what we
6 want. We want something that looks like downtown."
8
David Keller, Petaluma, says he gave comments to the City on the Draft EIR which
9
were not included in the Final EIR. He reminded Council that 45 years ago,
10
Petaluma was sued by developers who were upset that City Council stopped
11
building. Petaluma won that lawsuit and became a landmark in this nation in
12
planning history.
13
14
Katherine Bobrowski, Petaluma, asked why Target couldn't be put in the old
15
Mervyn's store.
16
17
Beau Bouverat, Petaluma, moved to Petaluma with his family three winters ago
18
and wondered if their honeymoon period with the city would ever end. He is a
19
filmmaker and created a documentary on the mortgage crisis about the impact
20
on small towns in America. The effects on Main Street, U.S.A. were horrific due to
21
huge shopping centers.
22
23
Matt Maguire, Petaluma, said that the City does not have a legally defensible EIR
24
as structured today. He said that he had a discussion with Regency and the
25
outcome was that Target tells Regency what to do. He suggested getting Target
26
to the table. He also suggested various design alternatives to the
27
standard "monolithic" Target stores.
28
29
Paul Francis, Petaluma, showed an overhead slide which outlined ten steps to a
30
successful project. He said "This project represents a complete failure of our
31
City's planning process." He believed the decision tonight is not only to approve
32
the preliminary proposal, but the bigger decision is to correct a whole series of
33
malfunctions and discrepancies starting with Regency's acquisition of the land.
34
35
Scott Braun, Petaluma, said he spent six years on the Central Petaluma Specific
36
Plan as an advisor. He recalled that in 1976 the Supreme Court upheld
37
Petaluma's right to tell developers where and how much they could develop.
38
39
There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Torliatt closed the PUBLIC
40
HEARING
41
42
Mr. Nickelson
43
44
Mayor Torliatt
45
46
Mr. Nickelson
47
48
Vice Mayor Glass
49
50
Mr. Nickelson
51
52
Vice Mayor Glass
Vol. 45 Page 106 February 8, 2010
Council Member Barrett
City Attorney Danly
Council Member Barrett
City Attorney Danly
Vice Mayor Glass
Geoff Bradley, Contract Principal Planner
Vice Mayor Glass
Mr. Bradley
Vice Mayor Glass
Mayor Torliatt
Mr. Nickelson
Mayor Torliatt
Mr. Nickelson
Mayor Torliatt
Mr. Nickelson
Mr. Bradley
Mayor Torliatt
Mr. Bradley
Mayor Torliatt
Mr. Bradley
Mayor Torliatt
Mr. Bradley
Curt Bates, City Engineer, Public Works Department
Mayor Torliatt
Mr. Bates
Mr. Nickelson
February 8, 2010
Council Member Barrett
9, WOLa'ia.�:Ti1
Council Member Barrett
Mr. Nickelson
Council Member Barrett
Mr. Bradley
Council Member Barrett
Mr. Bradley
Council Member Barrett
Vice Mayor Glass
Mr. Bradley
Vice Mayor Glass
Mr. Bradley
Mayor Torliatt
Mr. Nickelson
Vice Mayor Glass
Council Member Renee
Mr. Nickelson
Mayor Torliatt
City Manager Brown
Mayor Torliatt
City Attorney Danly
Mayor Torliatt
Mr. Farmer
Mayor Torliatt
Mr. Bates
Vol. 45, Page 107
Vol. 45 Page 108
Mayor Torliatt
Mr. Bates
Mayor Torliatt
Mr. Bates
Mayor Torliatt
Vice Mayor Glass
Mr. Nickelson
Mr. Bradley
Council Member Barrett
Mr. Bradley
Council Member Barrett
Council Member Renee
Council Member Barrett
Mayor Torliatt
Mr. Bates
Mayor Torliatt
Mr. Bates
Mayor Torliatt
Council Member Barrett
Mr. Nickelson
Council Member Renee
Mr. Bates
Mayor Torliatt
Council Member Barrett
City Attorney Danly
Mayor Torliatt
February 8, 2010
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
February 8, 2010
Council Member Barrett
Leslie Thompsen, Assistant City Attorney
Council Member Barrett
Ms. Thompsen
Frank Penry, Traffic Consultant
Council Member Barrett
Mayor Torliatt
Council Member Renee
Mayor Torliatt
Council Member Barrett
Mayor Torliatt
Council Member Renee
Vice Mayor Glass
City Attorney Danly
Council Member Renee
Council Member Rabbitt
Vice Mayor Glass
Mayor Torliatt
Council Member Barrett
Council Member Renee
Mr. Nickelson
Vice Mayor Glass
Vol. 45, Page 109
Motion: To continue the meeting past 11:00 p.m., as required by Council's Rules, Policies, and
Procedures.
Moved by David Glass, seconded by Teresa Barrett.
Vote: Motion carried 7-0.
Vol. 45 Page 1 10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
February 8, 2010
Yes:
Teresa Barrett; David Glass; Mike Harris; Mike Healy;
David Rabbitt; Tiffany Renee; Pamela Torliatt
No:
None
Abstain:
None
Absent:
None
Council Member Rabbitt
Mayor Torliatt
City Attorney Danly
Vice Mayor Glass
Council Member Harris
Mayor Torliatt
Mr. Bates
Mayor Torliatt
City Attorney Danly
Mr. Bates
City Attorney Danly
Mr. Bates
Mr. Nickelson
City Attorney Danly
Council Member Barrett
Mr. Bates
Council Member Renee
Mr. Bates
City Attorney Danly
Ms. Thompsen
Mr. Nickelson
Mayor Torliatt
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
February 8, 2010
City Attorney Danly
Mayor Torliatt
City Attorney Danly
Mayor Torliatt
Vice Mayor Glass
Council Member Barrett
Council Member Harris
Council Member Healy
Council Member Rabbitt
Council Member Renee
City Attorney Danly
Mayor Torliatt
Vice Mayor Glass
Council Member Healy
City Attorney Danly
Vol. 45, Page 1 1 1
Motion: Approve Resolution (2010-021A N.C.S.) Certifying an Environmental
Impact Report for the East Washington Place Project, Pursuant to the California
Environmental Quality Act; Resolution (2010-021 B N.C.S.) Making Findings of Fact
and Adopting a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Statement of
Overriding Considerations for the East Washington Place Project, Pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act; and, Resolution (2010-021 C N.C.S.)
Approving a Vesting Tentative Map for the East Washington Place Project,
Assessor's Parcel Numbers 007-031-001, 007-241-002, 007-251-001, 007-473-040,
substituting the Revised Exhibit C (Statement of Overriding Considerations) that
was presented at the dais and made available to the public, and including edits
and amendments enumerated by Council for the record and acceded to by the
applicant.
Moved by David Glass, seconded by Mike Healy.
Vote: Motion carried 5-2.
Yes:
David Glass; Mike Harris; Mike Healy;
David Rabbitt; Pamela Torliatt
No:
Teresa Barrett; Tiffany Renee
Abstain:
None
Absent:
None
Vol. 45Page ll2
2
3
4
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
February &20lU
MoyorTodiaff
Council Member Ren6e
Mr. Farmer
Council Member Ren6e
Mayor Torliaffconfirmed Council consensus that direction 1nthe Planning
Commission on items to be addressed as part of their Site Plan and Architectural
Review were 10include all nfthe items listed onpage A-|0ufthe staff report:
*
Use ofdorypn|esand/or visual simulations: The City's Site Plan and
Architectural Review Guidelines and adopted Story Pole Policy will be
complied with in design review.
IO
* Locally -made benches: Staff recommends that the Council direct the
21
Planning Commission toencourage the Applicant asfollows: "The applicant
22
shall contact the Petaluma High School administration office to request that
23
to the extent possible, high school students be engaged to fabricate and/or
24
participate /nthe design ofbenches used /npublic spaces ofthe Proecf."
25
The applicant has agreed to this provision, and included outreach to students
26
as part ofits public art presentation.
27
28
* Evergreens along -the freeway: Staff recommends that the Council direct the
29
Planning Commission to consider in its review of project landscaping plans the
30
inclusion ofdrought-tolerant evergreen plant species within project frontage
31
along the length ofthe Highway l0lcorridor which will reach omaturity ofot
32
least 25feet within lOyears.
33
34
* VYoyfindingsigns pointing toward Petaluma Historic Downtown Area and signs
]G
discouraging traffic from entering the East OStreet neighborhood: Will be
36
reviewed aspart ofdesign review ufall project signoge'ondp|ooementvvi||
37
be coordinated with the City Engineer's input regarding traffic control.
38
39
* Swim Center and Skate Park landscaping conditions: Will bereviewed in
40
design review, with all project |ondscopingp|onstnconfirmcomp|ioncewith
41
vesting tentative map conditions and sufficiency oflandscape design.
42
43
* Pedestrian, bicycle and vehicle access and circulation conditions relating to
44
the Swim Center and Skate Park: Pedestrian, bicycle and vehicle access and
45
circulation will be reviewed for the project as o whole and also regarding
46
relating to the Swim Center and compliance with conditions affecting access
47
to the Swim Center and Skate Park.
48
49
Aswell osthese items brought upottonight's meeting:
50
51
Pay special attention to:
52
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
IO
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
]2
]3
]4
35
36
37
38
]9
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
February 8, 2010
Vol. 45'Page l|3
* Bulk and massing onsite cuthe |ZOallows.
* Design ofthe fencing.
* Maximizing the public area ofthe site os itpertains 1nthe thoroughfare from
*
Further discuss the public art features proposed for the project, osoffmnadby
the applicant.
* Consider "super tree" species that are found tohave increased pollution
reduction qualities for use inthe project.The Planning Commission bnot
limited tnthese issues; they are 1nhave full purview from odesign-review
perspective, including where the buildings are actually situated nnthe site
within the parcels.
City AttorneyOanly
MaypTodiaU
Motion: To adjourn the meeting.
Moved by David Glass, seconded by Tiffany Ren6e.
Vote: Motion carried 7-0.
Yes:
Teresa Barrett; David Glass; Mike Harris; Mike Healy;
David RobbittTiffany Ren6e;Pamela TodiaM
No:
None
Abstain:
None
Absent:
None
The meeting was adjourned at 11:53 p.m.
ATTEST:
Claire Cooper, CMC, City Clerk
Pamela TodioM'Mayor