The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMinutes 04/24/1984Apr!T 24, 1984. 7:30 p.m. Petaluma California I PRESENT':. Commissioner Balshaw, and Tencer ABSEMI, r None Head, Hilligoss,, Popp, Read, Sobel STAFF: Warren Salmons, Principal Planner Kurt Yeiter., Associate Planner Les Ruh., Assistant City Engineer APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes: of March 27, 1984 and April 10, 1984 were approved as submitted. Staff noted that the Zoning Ordinance Amendment, particularly concerning bed and breakfast inns, would not be discussed at this meeting as suggested in the April 10, 1984 minutes.. L� CORRESPONDENCE None DIRECTOR'S REPORT Suggestion for discussion of administering minor revisions to Planned Unit. Developments. Will be discussed at meeting of. May 8, 1984. COMMISSIONERS' REPORT None PUBLIC �'HEARINGS I. D. AND S. BROWN, ET AL., UPHAM STREET NEIGHBORHOOD, REZONING (Files 3.318, 11.803) 1. Evaluation of EIQ for the following 2. Consideration of rezoning. The public hearing was opened. -1- Speakers=:; Mutt. Hudson, representing _ ,Ralph a-nd; Rosalie- Webb; 205. „ Keller :Street:,, submitted: two view foil 's as:, ;informational_'• .items Tom Ellis -,, 89.6. .Olive: Street':;, submitted letter. from: Mrs .. Mohrmon:. Bill Strobel,,, 819 Chileno Valley Road.,: executor of Strobel. residence property currently in- probate. Sharon Brown, 116 Stanley Street Mike,'Acorne,. 608 Baker Street. Ralph Webb, 222 Crest Road, Novato o, Jill Casad, 419 Upham Street Dr. Casad, 419 Upham, Street Annette Goelterman, 1060 Skillman Lane, owner of 414 Upham Street Rosalie Webb, 222 Crest Road, Novato Einar Hansen,, 404 Upham Street Leroy Risotti, 355 McN'ear Avenue Bob Hammel., 421 Upham Street The public hearing was closed. No action was taken on the- EIQ . Motion introduced. by Commissioner Head, seconded by Commissioner Hilligoss that the application for rezoning be denied. AYES: 7 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 II. LEONARD JAY AND T DEVELOPMENT CO., P'UD REVISION AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN CASA DEL ORO II AND IIA (File 3.315) 1. Consideration of PUD rezoning and development plan.,._ The public hearing was opened. Speakers: Leonard Jay, 9 Cloud Lane The public hearing was closed. -2- Motion .; ntroduced: by= Commissioners Popp:;,. seconded' -by 'Commi'ssioner Head that the .-C recommend. to "the• City Council approval of the PUD' rezoning and_:.d'evelopment' plan based° on' the. following , findings arid conditions: PUD FINDINGS 1., The rezoning is required by Zoning. Ordinance Section 19A -100.. 2,t The plan clearly results in a more desirable use of land and a . better physical environment than would be possible under any single zoning district or' combination of districts. 3 The district' is proposed as property which has a suitable relationship to Casa. Grande . Road and Sartori Drive, which is 1 adequate to carry additional traffic generated by the project. 4 >;, The development plan presents a unified and organized arrangement of buildings and service facilities which are + appropriate in relation to adjacent or nearby properties, and adequate landscaping is proposed. 5.:' The natural and scenic. qualities of the site, are protected, with adequate available public and private spaces designated on the Development Plan. 6.; � The proposed development will not be detrimental to the public welfare , will' be in the best interests of the City, and will. be in keeping with the general intent' and spirit of the Petaluma Zoning Ordinance and the General' and Environmental Design Plans. 7. Casa Del Oro I included improvement of Adobe Creek and a public . park improvements. PUD CONDITION`S 1. The PUD development plan, including housing models and elevations, shall be subject to design approval in accordance with Section 26 -401 of. the Zoning Ordinance. All conditions of design review shall become conditions of the P.U.D. zone.. 2. Any changes to the Casa Del Oro II site plan or development plan made pursuant to these conditions or SPARC conditions of approval, shall be reflected on a new development plan, a sepia print and one copy of which shall be provided to the Department of Community Development within thirty (30) working days after final approval of such change(s). 3. Development standards for Casa Del Oro II (e.g., building setbacks and height regulations, allowable and conditional uses, accessory buildings and /or dwelling units, home occupations, and other such related standards and uses) shall be consistent with those applicable to-the R -1 65.00 Zoning District. -3- 4 If-" .Covenants-,-_Condrtions; and Restrictions-° "(CC: &R'sr): are;'devel'oped for" Casa. Del Oro II:, development :stand`ards� ;no .less! restrictive than those, -applicable to the R. ="l ' "65;00;: toningi District : - shall be included, therein_. 5. Complete. side and rear•" yard. fences the same; as: those provided. in Casa. Del Oro: - I- shall be- installed. prior to, occupancy- of-. the. affected` logs. Plans, for_ said fences shall b.e 'subject, to SPARC approval prior to the issuance of building, permits._ 6. Lawns shall be: provided in .all. required front yards and street . side yards of* corner lots. Plans depicting said. lawn: areas shall be approved by` SPARC. prior." to lawn.. installation., T. 'The DB =103 (Sonoma Plan.) two - bedroom models shall not be replaced with 3+ 'bedroom models.. Thee proposed DB -100E. (Farallon) three bedroom/loft may be substituted for no. more than nine (9) previously approved models containing three; or more,- bedrooms. provided` that the location and DB -100E model, floor plan and elevations receive prior SPARC approval,. If ninety days from A priZ 25, 2984., the two- bedroom models are" not soZd,, the two- bedroom models may be replaced with three - bedroom models.. AYES: 6 NOES: 1 (Balshaw) ABSENT:- 0 The Commission. requested that a development schedule for this. development be included with the Council, packet. Staff was requested to, make: sure that the• setbacks as noted on the development plan were in. compliance with stated setbacks. PLANNING MATTERS III, DUFFEL FINANCIAL. AND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY HARTMAN PROPERTY', CASA GRANDE` ROAD AND ELY BOULEVARD SOUTH (FUTURE) , APPEAL OF PARCEL MAP 1. Consideration of appeal of staff denial of parcel map. The public hearing was opened. Speaker: Van Norden Logan, representing Duffel Financial and Construction Company The public hearing was closed. Motion introduced by Commissioner Head to deny appeal. The motion died for lack of. a second. -4- c 1V , Motion ;introduced�-by Commissioner Hillhgoss;. seconded b:y C'ommissioner . Po ty pp to- recomriiend to •the Ci _Council ' th at: the, appeal ._;of _'the, Hartman: par.ceP map .b "" .upheld'_ .anal the map- approved` subject to} ,the% following conditions Dedications of land "',. shall be- made for utility easements and, on- f street rights -of -way. required for Casa . Grande Road and Ely:. ,w pp • '' B'oulevard'•'South (:future)'. Dedication shall be to "the a royal' of" the City Engineer. 2.;;! Engineering plans and specifications for complete half street improvement for the• Casa Grande Road and Ely Boulevard frontages shall. prepared and submitted-with the parcel map.. C) 3.f Construction- of said improvements shall occur at such 'time as Parcel 1 is^ developed or further division of Parcels 1 or 2 occurs. Q . i AYES: 7 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 IV, D ',A- V -D -E -L CORPORATION, CREEKVIEW COMMONS, TENTATIVE MAP EXTENSION,, ELY BOULEVARD NORTH AND L;YN,CH CREEK WAY (Fi1e 6. 452) A..P. Nos. 136- 110 -83, 84, 86 and 88 and 149 - 090• -02 1. Consideration: of tentative map extension. Motion introduced by Commissioner Hilligoss seconded by Commissioner Balshaw to, extend thet tentative map: to November 11, 1984 subject to the• following condition: 1. The project shall be subject to payment of storm drainage impact fees as provided for in Resolution No. 9565 N. C. S< , and as calculated in Chapter 17.30 of the Petaluma Municipal Code. AYES: 7 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 V. SONOMA FINANCIAL CORPORATION, COUNTRY CLUB ESTATES IA,, TENTATIVE MAP EXTENSION, MC NEAR AVENUE AT COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE (File 6.507) A.P. No. 008 -540 -1 through 62 1. Consideration of tentative map extension. Speaker: Jack Macy, Mitchell and Heriford, representing Sonoma Financial Corporation Motion introduced by Commissioner Head, seconded by Mr. Balshaw, that the tentative map be extended for a full year to May 3, 1985, based on the following condition: -5- Kn 1 °•: Th property owner;., Sonoma Financial.. C`orporatiorn.,. shall apply ttvk °i`�iilr ,l eit / 141 *,6 for reversion' toy acreage'- for- the: •previously approved - pr"ojec;f. known 'as Court -try 'Crab,,. E'st'ates -I - nb, 'later; than November 3:,F 19 2f they ffn�al maps for Unit IA 'has not, . been approw,.ed b:'•that= AYES: 7 NOES,: 0 ABSENT ": 0 VI. CONSID'ERAT'IO'N OF' AD'DITIO:N OF NON - GENERAL PLAN. ITEMS 'TO MAY' 8, 19.8'4` :CO`MMISSION AGENDA Commission- directed staff. toF x°escheddle. the .Kentucky Fried`. Chicken request for ;revision. to. the General Plan and to consideration of a use- permit to permit conclusion of` the. discussion of Item VII: below-. .. Staff' was requested to notify the applicant and renotice the item. The following items may be- scheduled for the May "$, 1984: 1, Seniors Care Home,: Victorian Manor 2. Nizibian Tentative Map 3. Discussion of Planned Unit Developments: 4. Discussion of East Washington Street Corridor., ZONING MATTERS VII. DISCUSSION OF EAST WASHIN`G.TON STREET CORRIDOR (LAKEVILLE STREET TO U. S. 101) 1. Discussion of consistency of existing land use with current zoning and general plan designations. Not discussed. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 11:30 p.m, -6-