HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 06/12/1984Regula'r.. Meeting 7:, p m.
City Council: Chambers Petaluma,. California
PRESENT: Commissioners- Balshaw, Heads, Hilligoss, Popp, Read, Sobel
ABSENT: Commissioner Tencer
STAFF:: Gregory Freitas * . Community Development and Planning;, Director
Warren Salmons; Principal Planner
Michael Moore, Associate Planner
Kurt Yeiter, Associate Planner
i .
APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of May 22, 1984 were approved as
amended:
Page 3, Item I, Lakeville Plan Line
Commissioner HMigoss decZared a conflict of
interest due to financial interest and left the
podium.
ree p a ning o s
Commissioners at their request.
DIRECTOR'S REPORT None.
CORRESPONDENCE Notice was distributed regarding availability of
th 1 n bo k available to
COMMISSIONERS' REPORT: None.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
I. KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN, HARMAN MANAGEMENT
CORPORATION, 701 EAST WASHINGTON STREET: EIQ, GENERAL
PLAN /EDP LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT AND USE PERMIT,
A.P. NO. 007 - 052 -21, 29, 31 (Files 1.404, 8.87, 11.777)
Continuation of Public Hearing from meeting of March 27, 1984.
1. Evaluation of EIQ for the following:
2. Consideration of the General Plan Amendment.
3. Consideration of Use Permit.
The public hearing was opened.
-1-
Jim: Olson, Division Manager, Harmon Management, 60 Station
Road Daly City, representing applicant.
Correspondence introduced from Total. Sound Incorporated -
regarding locking volume control.
Petition accepted, sign_ ed by customers of Kentucky Fried Chicken„
Petaluma the following paragraph headin& each page of
signatures:
"I have seen the drawings for the. proposed expansion of the
Kentucky Fried Chicken located at 701 East Washington Street
in., Petaluma and I am. in favor of the addition of the dining,.
room,. drive -thru lane, and parking area."
The. public hearing was closed,.
Motion introduced, by - Commissioner' Popp; seconded; by
Commissioner Sobel that the Commission approve a. Negative
Declaration based on the following findings:
1,. No significant environmental' effects will result from the
General Plan/EDP amendment.
2. The use is consistent with the General Plan and Zoning Map .
designations- of commercial for the area.
3. The proposed drive. - through order station is,. located far
enough away from the abutting residences and a sound wall
will be constructed to significantly reduce the potential for
future noise disturbances.
4. The potential for excessive .on -and -off site litter accumulation
will be mitigated as a condition of use permit approval.
5. East 'Washington and Vallejo Streets are adequate in design to
accommodate the future traffic and traffic movements
generated by the use,, and driveways have been offset to
prevent conflict with Carl's Market.
AYES: 6 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 1 (Tencer)
-2-
1
IV
W
Motion introduced; b, ,- Commissioner Popp<,; seconded by
:
Commissioner;'Hi'll'igoss: that: the. Commission Frecommend `to •the: City
Council: that . tliey' approve an ameridmenf- . -• to3 the. General. P.lan[EDP
chang- ing._.the designation of :A.P.< Nos.:, 007 - 05'2 -21, and`- 007= 052 -29.
,.
fromr_ Urban 'Low, Density R'esid'ential'. to: Central Urban Commercial.
AYES,:... b,. N.O.ES; 0.: AB "SEN.T,:. 1, (Tencer).
Motion introduced. by Commissioner Popp, seconded by
Commissioner Hilligoss that the use permit be approved subject to
the following conditions:
U 1. A.T. - Nos,. 00;7- 05.2: -21,. 29 and 31 shal1 be- merged prior to the
ry issuance of any building permits
2. Use permit shall be reviewed annua'll'y by staff... If. complaints
are received.. regarding the operation of the restaurant or if.
staff: finds non- compliance with the conditions of approval,
the matter will be brought to the Commission's attention.
3. The permitted hours of operation for the restaurant shall. be
as follows.:
11:00 a.m. to 10 :00 p.m. Seven days per week
between September and
June
10 :00 a.m..: to 10 :00 P.:m.. Sunday through Thursday
June, July, August
10:0.0 a.. m.. to 11: p . m . Friday and Saturday
June, July, August
The permitted, hours for truck delivery :and garbage pick -up
.shall be as follows.:
10 :00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Daily
4. The garbage dumpster compactor' shall not be used after 9:00
p.m. or before 9:.00 a.m.
5. A regular twice. .daily, litter pickup shall be conducted by
restaurant employees covering the restaurant premises and
neighboring properties in the vicinity.
6. Driveway entrances shall be chained closed during
non- operating hours and signs maintained at the entrances
noting operating hours.
7. Authority shall be granted by the property owner to the City
Police Department to permit the police to enter the site during
-3-
10'. The: proposed site plan, including parking, circulation,,.
,landscaping,, p.Zacement of the cupola and, other related design
features. s-hal-I.. be subject 'to "review by SP'ARC and 'shall'- meet-
all'. current City 'design standards.
11. -All: planting shall be maintained in good ,growing conditions.
Such maintenance shall include., where appropriate, pruning:,
mowing weeding,, cleaning, of debris and trash,- fertilizing
and; regular watering.: Whenever °necessary,, planting, shall be
replaced with other plant materials to insure continued
compliance- with applicable landscaping, requirements.
Required irrigation systems shall be fully maintained in sound
operating, condition. with heads periodically cleaned and
replaced when missing; to insure continued regular watering of
landscape areas, and health and vitality of landscape.
materials..
12'. The applicants shall. offer the house on Averye Way to
Burbank Housing or other organization. to be :relocated rather
than demolished to - make room for the proposed. parking lot
expansion
Z3:. A fence or waZZ shall be integrated into the hedge row
adjacent to the drive- through Zane to prevent pedestrian
access between the ; parking Zot: and the drive through Zane.
AYES: 6 NOES: 0. ABSENT: 1 ('Tencer)
II. LEONARD JAY AND: T DEVELOPMENT :. EIQ, GENERAL PLAN /EDP
LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT FROM C -0 TO PLANNED
RESIDENTIAL, A.P. NO. 137 - 060 -30 (PORTION) AND STAFF
RECOMMENDED INCLUSION OF A.P. NO. 137- 060. -29 (Files 8.92,
11.805)
The public hearing was opened..
Speaker:
Leonard
Jay, 9
Cloud Lane
1. Evaluation
of EIQ
for the
following:
-4-
Or
2 Consideration of. General Plan Amendment
Motion introduced by C'ommission'er Hilligoss, seconded
Commissioner. Read by that `the Commission recommend that the
City Council -,. direct staff. to. issue a negative: declaration' based_ on.
the- following findings:
1.. No significant. environmental, impacts. have; been identified;. for
the project which cannot be mitigated during 'subsequent
development..
2., Detailed environmental analysis will be conducted in
conjunction with review of any specific development project
proposed subsequent to the- GP' /EDP amendment :.
AYES: 6
NOES: 0 ABSENT': 1 (Tencer)
Motion introduced by Commissioner Hilligoss, seconded by
Commissioner Read that the Commission recommend that the City
Council approve the amendment to the GP /EDP for A.P. No.
137- 060 -30 including the amendments suggested by staff for A..P.
No. 137 - 060 -29 redesignating approximately six acres of
Commercial Office- to Planned Residential. iA1J1 / ,'kWdikWg / 1VUe
S b6/ PAW. 1HdiA4k *)W ldri l]�il1�AbAF2Hl<_
AYES: 6 NOES,:. 0 ABSENT:. 1 (Tencer)
III. CITY OF PETALUMA,, GENERAL PLAN /EDP LAND USE ELEMENT
TEXT AMENDMENT,, AIRPORT REFERRAL AREA POLICIES
(File 8.89)
1. Consideration of General Plan Amendment.
The public hearing was opened.
Speaker: Derek Simmons, 415 Russell Avenue., Santa Rosa,
representing Mr. Amaral
The public hearing was closed.
Motion introduced by Commissioner Popp,, seconded by
Commissioner Sobel that the Commission recommend that the City
Council adopt the amendments to the GP/EDP land use element as
follows:
With regard to the referral area, horizontal and conical zones for
the Sky Ranch Airport and the new Municipal Airport, proposals
for development shall be required to adhere to the following
policies:
-5-
.AYES: 6 NOES;: 0 ABSENT': 1 (Tencer)
IV. CITY COUNCIL REFERRAL TO' COMMISSION.: EIQ,. REZONING,.
FROM R -C TO R -1 5000, UPHAM' STREET AREA,. (Files 3.318,
11.803)
I.. Evaluation of .EIQ for -the following:
2. Consideration of rezoning..
The public hearing, was opened.
Speakers:
Dr.. Casad,, 419. Upham Street
Effie Ruano 428 Upham Street
Diane Hansen., 404 Upham Street
George Cardell, 407 Upham, Street
Dick Lieb, 1 Bo'de.ga Avenue representing T. and P. Keiligren.
Jill. Casad,, 419 Upham Street
Bob Hammel 421 Upham Street
Einer Hansen,. 404 Upham Street
David. Brown,;. 116 Stanley Street
Sharon Brown:,. 116 Stanley Street
Bill Strobel, 410 Upham Street
The public hearing was closed.:
Motion introduced by Commissioner Sobel, seconded by
Commissioner. Hilligoss that the property - owners in the
neighborhood defined by the City Council, be polled _to_ determine
I...
Land:- .uses shall' be consistent with- Airport ''Land: Use,, Policy
.Plan. including; but : n:ot , limited'.: ,ao . prohibition. 'of
from..' clear ° ;zones,. control.. 'of=T str.-uctures ;relative to structure:
height_ or coverage:;. conformity of :-. employee density-,. and-
insul "aton from noises, - as> required
2..
The Petaluma. General, Plan /ED'P :s:upports the:. policies: and
standards of the, Sonoma. County ..Airport .Land U`se Policy Plan:
.
including noise policies,' airspace policies, safety, policies,, and'
referral area p.olicies�.
3.
Smoke sources or electronic emissions, should be avoided..
4�4,,
.. Development applications within the horizontal, sand conical-
zones and the -area designated as, the: Primary Referral, Area
'Boundary shall be referred to the Airport Land Use.
Commission for review and comment..
.AYES: 6 NOES;: 0 ABSENT': 1 (Tencer)
IV. CITY COUNCIL REFERRAL TO' COMMISSION.: EIQ,. REZONING,.
FROM R -C TO R -1 5000, UPHAM' STREET AREA,. (Files 3.318,
11.803)
I.. Evaluation of .EIQ for -the following:
2. Consideration of rezoning..
The public hearing, was opened.
Speakers:
Dr.. Casad,, 419. Upham Street
Effie Ruano 428 Upham Street
Diane Hansen., 404 Upham Street
George Cardell, 407 Upham, Street
Dick Lieb, 1 Bo'de.ga Avenue representing T. and P. Keiligren.
Jill. Casad,, 419 Upham Street
Bob Hammel 421 Upham Street
Einer Hansen,. 404 Upham Street
David. Brown,;. 116 Stanley Street
Sharon Brown:,. 116 Stanley Street
Bill Strobel, 410 Upham Street
The public hearing was closed.:
Motion introduced by Commissioner Sobel, seconded by
Commissioner. Hilligoss that the property - owners in the
neighborhood defined by the City Council, be polled _to_ determine
a F 59
th6r.-' wishes' an& that the. action _ on,. this mattet 'be; continued to
�r the: meeting 6f!.J•uly : J0', 1984,.
NOES: 0 A'B',SENT': T (Tencer)
!.
V.. ROMEO' MrAFFIA;, - 8.36, DICKSON- HILL - COURT, USE PERMIT FOR
ACCESSORY DWELLING, A.P. NO'. 006- 412 -49 (File 1.424)
j 1. Consideration of use permit.
The public hearing was opened.
Speakers:
cc Charlie Dawson, 2649 I Street,. representing applicant
Junior Maffia, 836 Dickson Hill Court
The• public hearing was closed.
Motion introduced by Commissioner Popp, seconded by
Commissioner 'Hilligoss that the use permit be approved subject to
the following conditions:
i
1. The project shall be subject to site plan and architectural
review according to Section 26 -401 of the Zoning Ordinance':.
1
(;
2. The: colors and exterior materials of construction should match
the existing residence..
3. The accessory dwelling shall be limited to one bedroom.
4. Verify by providing copy of easement, right of access by
second unit.
5. Existing, six foot fence shall be retained.. Location of gate
shall be moved to provide better access to proposed parking
space, subject to site design and architectural approval, or,
basketball goal shall be removed.
6. A 500 square foot landscaped yard area shall be provided for
the accessory dwelling unit.
AYES: 6 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 1 (Tencer)
I
VI. MC BAIL COMPANY, SPRING MEADOWS UNITS III AND IV, PUD
j UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT UNIT III (File 3.259B);
I' REZONING FROM PCD TO PUD UNIT IV (File 3.320)
I I
!,
I. Consideration of PUD Unit Development Plan amendment.
2. Consideration of rezoning.
-7-
Findings :
1:.. The- plan clearly results in. as more desirable- use of land;, and. a.
better physical, environment than would be possible under any
single zoning district or combination of zoning districts.
2. The P'. U . D . District As 'proposed on property which has a.
suitable relationship to: one (1,) or _ more; thoroughfares ;. and
that said thoroughfares are adequate toy carry any additional
traffic generated by the development.
3.. The plan for the proposed development presents a unified and
organized arrangement' of buildings and' -service facilities
which are appropriate in relation to adjacent or nearby
properties: and that adequate landscaping and/or screening, is
included if necessary to insure compatibility.
4.. The natural:. 'and. scenic qualities of the site are protected,,,
with, adequate available public and private spaees: designated
on the Unit Development Plan.
5;. The development of the subject property, in the manner
proposed by the applicant.,. will- not 'be: detrimental to the
public welfar.e�, will be in the, bent interests of the City and
will be in keeping with the general' . intent and_ spirit. of the
zoning :regulation of the, 'City of Petaluma, with the Petaluma
General: Plan, and with the Environmental Design Plan adopted
by the 'City.
Conditions
1. Documents :will be generated, recorded and made available to
buyers which will include references regarding development
standards which shall likewise become conditions of zoning
approval, including:,
a. Maximum principal and. accessory building heights per
City Zoning Ordinance Rl- Single Family Residential
Zoning District.
f. Building setbacks for principal buildings' shall be not
less than the following:
Front -',: 20 feet or setback defined on the development
map.
Rear 20 feet.
Side 1 -5 feet aggregate:, not less than 5 feet on one
side or 10. feet for attached units with the
opposite side- at 0 feet.
Measurements shall be made -from the closest point of the
building to the closest point of the appropriate property
line.
2. Noise mitigation measures to reduce interior CNEL levels from
exterior sources to 40 dba or lower in bedroom areas and. 45-
dba or lower in all other interior living areas shall be
incorporated into housing design.
}, 3. Elevations of housing models, overall model distribution plan,
tree planting /landscaping and fencing plans• shall be subject
to SP-ARC review and be consistent with plans for Phase III.
4. Revised sepia prints of the final approved development
plan /landscaping plan reflecting all conditions of approval
I
shall . be submitted to the Community Development and
1 Planning Department within sixty days after Council approval
of the revised development plan. Any subsequent
substitution or redistribution of models within the parameters
herein described shall be accompanied by revised sepia prints
of the development and landscape plans.
_
n
b Rebuilding and/or replacement.. of'- .originally approved'
j
strtuctures, ;• including fencing',". shalr, ,con form..'to approved
unit development
4 ,.
.
Garage conversions; are permitted subject to the
•'
regulations of` the. City-Zoning. Or'd'inance.
d: Home,roccupat are permitted 'subject to the regulations
of the. Petaluma. City Zoning. Ordinance and provisions of
I �
the project CC &R's._
e.. Accessory structures, including accessory dwellings and
building. additions, are permitted subject to the
"
regulations, of..:t.he.- Petaluma, City Zoning, Ordinance for
C)
j'
accessory• structures, and building additions tol R -1 zoning
1
standa_r.ds and as° described herein. Any such
structures or additions shall be compatible; with existing
1
house design and be subject to review by SP_ARC and
any architectural review committee established by the
j,
project CC &R's..
f. Building setbacks for principal buildings' shall be not
less than the following:
Front -',: 20 feet or setback defined on the development
map.
Rear 20 feet.
Side 1 -5 feet aggregate:, not less than 5 feet on one
side or 10. feet for attached units with the
opposite side- at 0 feet.
Measurements shall be made -from the closest point of the
building to the closest point of the appropriate property
line.
2. Noise mitigation measures to reduce interior CNEL levels from
exterior sources to 40 dba or lower in bedroom areas and. 45-
dba or lower in all other interior living areas shall be
incorporated into housing design.
}, 3. Elevations of housing models, overall model distribution plan,
tree planting /landscaping and fencing plans• shall be subject
to SP-ARC review and be consistent with plans for Phase III.
4. Revised sepia prints of the final approved development
plan /landscaping plan reflecting all conditions of approval
I
shall . be submitted to the Community Development and
1 Planning Department within sixty days after Council approval
of the revised development plan. Any subsequent
substitution or redistribution of models within the parameters
herein described shall be accompanied by revised sepia prints
of the development and landscape plans.
Motion introduced , by Commissioner Hilligoss,:. seconded by
Commissioner! Sobel that - the Planning Commission, recommend that
the City Council approve the:: ,PUD Rezoning for Spring Meadow
IV based, on the following, findings and subject to the following
conditions:.
Findings ::. .
1. The plan clearly results in a more desirable use of ,land and a
better physical environment than would be pos'sibl'e under any
single zoning district -or. combination of zoning districts.
2. The P.U.D. District is proposed on property which has a
suitable-. relationship to one (1) or more thoroughfares; and
that said thoroughfares are adequate to carry any additional.
traffic generated by the development.
3_ The plan for. the- proposed development presents -a unified and:
organized arrangement of buildings, and service facilities
which are 'appropriate in - relation- to adjacent or nearby
properties and that adequate landscaping; and /'or screening is
included. if necessary to insure compatibility.
4-.. The natural and scenic qualities of the- site are protected, .
with adequate. available public and private -spaces, designated
on the Unit Development Plan. -
5 The development of the_ - subject- property., in the manner
proposed, by the applicant:, will not be detrimental to the
public welfare, will 'be in the best - interests of the City and
will be in keeping' with the general intent and spirit of the
zoning, regulation of, the City of Petaluma, with the Petaluma
General Plan,, and with the Environmental Design Plan adopted
by the City.
-10-
q = 63....
Conditions
1., Documents, will be- generated, , recorded and: made available. -to
buyers-which, wilh inc lude..references, regarding development,
- f
standards which:. shall. likewise .become conditions- : of; .zoning
i. , approval,,' includin
a.- Maximu principal, and accessory building_ heights per
City' Zoning. Ordinance R1- Singl'e Family ' Residential
,. Zoning, District..
b. Rebuilding, nd /or replacement of originally. a roved
g. P PP
structures.,. including fencing;, shall conform to approved
- �- unit development plan=...
U
C. Garage conversions are permitted subject to the
regulations of the. City Zoning Ordinance.
Q �
d. Home occupations are permitted. subject to the regulations,
j of the Petaluma City Zoning Ordinance and provisions of
! the project CC. &R's'.
e. Accessory structures, including accessory dwellings and
building additions, are permitted subject to the
regulations of the Petaluma City Zoning Ordinance. for
accessory structures and building- additions to R -1 zoning
standards and as: described herein.. Any such
structures. or' additions shall be compatible with existing
house design and. bes subject to review by SPARC,. and
any architectural review committee established by the
project. CC &R's.
f. Building setbacks for principal buildings shall be not
less than the following
Front 20 feet or setback defined on the development
map
Rear. 20 feet.
Side 15 feet aggregate, not less than 5 feet on one
side or 10 feet' for attached units with the
opposite side at 0 feet.
Measurements shall be made from the closest point of the
building to the closest point of the appropriate property
line.
[1
2. Noise mitigation measures to reduce interior CNEL levels from
exterior sources to 40 dba or lower in bedroom areas and 45
dba or lower in all other interior living areas shall be
incorporated into housing design.
-11-
3, Elevations of housing model`s,, overall, model. dis"tributon.. plan,,
tree. planting[Iaiidscaping;, .and. fencing plans ,shall: be subject.
.:,. to °SPARC'. review `and b;e .consistent: with pla =ns; for Pi ase. III.
4`.. Revised sepia printsi of,= " the: final approved; " development '
plan / land'scaping plan:' reflecting all conditions: of approval
f. shall be: submitted, to - - the, - :Community,: Development., and
"r• Planning Department within- sixty days after Council' approval
of the, revised` development plan.:; Any subsequent
substitution or redistribution of models within the parameters
of the development and landscape plans by revised. sepia:: prints
herein described shall be 'accompanied
5:.. Developer requested one =story model substitutions shall be
limited'` to not more than twenty percent of the total dwellings
in >. each unit, i..e Phases III' or IV with no, deletion of two
story. units
AYES`. 5 NOES: 1 ('Popp) ABSENT': l (Tencer)
ZONING MATTERS
VII. DISCUSSION OF EAST WA'SHING'TON STREET CORRIDOR
K
(LA- EVILLE' STREET` TO U.. S 101)
The item was' postponed.
VIII.INFORMATION ITEM.: PUD ZONING DISTRICT'
4 Initial staff proposals for rezoning :selected PUp zones� and
text amendments. Continuation from meeting. of May 22, 1984.
The item was postponed.
PLANNING MATTERS
IX. CONSIDERATION OF REVISION TO COMMISSION RULES OF
ORDER
1. Adoption of amended Commission Rules and Regulations for
the Transaction of Business.
-12-
1
22
-13-
- ...
v
- 1.; yc
a + . }�• fi'''
..
Motion,:` „'introduced by,,; Commissioner
Sobel;- .seconded,
by
Commissioner. Popes, ,that ,•the' revised:•
P1'annng Commission
Rules, and °Regulations for- the Transaction of. 'Business.
be.
adopted%
AY.E&... 5 NOES:, 0 ABSENT: 1 (TencerY
ABSTAIN:: . 1 (Balshaw)..
ADJOURNMENT:
The meeting was adjourned at
11:05 p,. m.
22
-13-