Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 08/28/1984114 Petaluma Planning Commission Regular Meeting City Council Chambers Not Official Until Approved By The Planning Commission MINUTES August 28, 1984 7:,30 p.m,. Petaluma, California PRESENT: Commis sioners Head, Hilligoss, Libarle, Perry *, Read, Sobel, and Tencer ABSENT: None STAFF: Gregory Freitas, Community Development and Planning Director Warren 'Salmons, Principal Planner * Commissioner Perry arrived at 8:10 PM. APPROVAL OF MINUTES RE: Item IV of Minutes of August 14, Dr. George Lane, 9 W. El Rose Drive made a, request to have a continuance of the decision. He would like the minutes of the August 14, 1984 meeting to reflect this request. Condition 1., revised to read ... minimum of 17 by 23.5 feet. Minutes of August '14, 1984 were approved. CORRESPONDENCE Commissioner Sobel has sent a letter requesting an item be placed on the agenda relating to the issue of adult entertainment. Mr. Freitas had hand' -out material from the League of California Cities relating to this matter. DIRECTOR'S REPORT No report. COMMISSIONERS' REPORT Commissioner Read requested several items - 1) League of California Cities Planning Commissioners Handbook, 2) City Managers General Report (Weekly) , 3) Information regarding APA Conference. PUBLIC HEARINGS L. USE. PERMIT FOR AUTO REPAIR SHOP, 1304 SCOTT STREET, SUITE D, EXOTIC AUTO BODY, A.P. NO. 007 - 592 -09 (1.433) 1. Consideration of Use Permit. The public hearing was opened. Speakers: None 1 115 The public hearing was closed. Motion introduced by Commissioner Head, Seconded by Commissioner Sobel to approve the use permit subject to the following conditions. 1. No autos awaiting repair, tires, auto parts, trash, machinery etc. shall be stored outdoors on the site. 2. All repair operations, e.g., servicing, painting, sand blasting, shall be conducted entirely within the building. 3. Any signing for the proposed use shall conform with the approved sign program for the building and the Petaluma zoning ordinance. 00 4. The use shall comply at all times with the City's Performance q q Standards as set forth in Article 22 of the zoning ordinance. 0 Co 5. All spray painting and sand blasting work shall be done inside a proper booth which shall be subject to approval of the Building Department and the Fire Marshal. 6. All, landscaping shall be maintained in good .growing condition. Such maintenance shall include, where appropriate, pruning, mowing, weeding, cleaning, fertilizing, and regular watering. Whenever necessary, planting shall be replaced with other plant materials to insure continued compliance with applicable landscaping requirements. AYES: 5 NOES: 1 (Read) ABSENT 1 (Perry) II. USE PERMIT FOR ON SALE BEER AND WINE, 406 EAST WASHINGTON STREET, LONG JOHN SILVER'S SEAFOOD SHOPPE, A.P. NOS. 007 -132- 01/03/28/31 (1.393A) 1. Consideration of Use Permit. The' public hearing was opened. Speakers: Mr. David Murrin, Representative from Long John Silvers. The public hearing was closed. Motion introduced by Commissioner Head, Seconded by Commissioner Libarle to approve the use permit subject to the following conditions as found in the staff report: 1. An on sale liquor license shall be secured from the State Alcoholic Beverage Control Board. 2. The use permit shall be subject to review by the Planning Commission in the event that any problems are created by use. 2 116 3. The proposed sale of beer and wine shall be in conjunction with meals ordered and consumed inside the restaurant. The beverages shall not be sold for pick -up at the drive -thru lane. 4. All previous conditions of approval shall remain in force. AYES: 6 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 1 (Perry) III. USE PERMIT FOR ACCESSORY DWELLING, 900 RUTH COURT, JOSEPH PAGLIARO, A.P. NO. 006- 470 -2I (1.434) 1. Consideration of Use Permit. The public hearing was opened. Speakers: None. The public hearing was closed. Motion introduced by .Commissioner Head, Seconded by Commissioner Libarle to approve the use permit subject to the following findings and conditions as found in the Staff Report: Findings 1. The proposed accessory dwelling will conform to the requirements and intent of the Petaluma Zoning Ordinances, the Petaluma General Plan and Environmental Design Plan. 2. The proposed accessory dwelling will not constitute a nuisance or be detrimental to the public welfare of the community. Recommended Conditions 1. The accessory dwelling shall be limited to one bedroom. 2. A 400 square foot landscaped yard area shall be provided for the accessory dwelling unit subject to staff approval. 3. The accessory dwelling shall be painted to match the new residence. 4. The accessory dwelling shall be .subject to inspection by the Building Department. AYES: 6 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 1 (Perry) 3 11'7 IV. USE PERMIT ALLOWING MODIFICATION OF AN EXISTING SERVICE STATION, 2 PETALUMA BOULEVARD SOUTH (B And Petaluma Blvd.) , CHEVRON U.S.A., A.P. NOS. 008 -063- 08 (1.427) 1. Consideration of Use Permit. This item was withdrawn prior to the meeting. V. ADOPTION OF LAKEVILLE PLAN LINE, CAULFIELD LANE TO SOUTH MCDOWELL BOULEVARD EXTENSION, CITY OF PETALUMA (11.802) 00 Commissioner Hilligoss noted her conflict of interest and excused I . herself (she owns property in the area) . 0 Continuation from July 10, 1984 meeting. co Q 1. Continuation of 'Environmental Information presentation for following: 2. Continuation of public review process for the proposed precise plan line for future widening /improvement of Lakeville Highway. Commissioner Perry arrived at this time (8:10 PM) . Speakers: John Wagstaff, Wagstaff and Brady Richard Rodkin, Charles Salter and Assoc. Thomas S. Hargis, Director of Public Works /City Engineer The public hearing was closed. Motion introduced by Commissioner Read, Seconded by Commissioner Sobel to recommend to the City Council the issuance of a mitigated Negative Declaration based on the following findings: 1. The plan line as proposed is consistent with the Petaluma General Plan /Environmental Design Plan; 2. The Final Study for the Lakeville Plan Line Project adequately evaluates the project's impact upon the environment and has been completed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act an`d in accordance with the Guidelines for Implementation of said Act prescribed by the State of California Secretary of Resources and with the Local Guidelines implementing the California Environmental Quality Act adopted by . the Council of the City of Petaluma; 3. The Commission has reviewed and considered the information in said Final Study; and that qualified consultants have prepared the Final Study; and the . Planning Commission has reviewed the environmental documents applicable to the recommended project; 4 IV � • 4. Approval of the proposed Project will have both direct and indirect effects on the environment as identified in - the Final Environmental Impact Report; 5. There are certain significant adverse air quality impacts which cannot be avoided if the recommended project is implemented, and these impacts are noted in the Final Study; 6. A number of proposed mitigation measures which can be implemented to minimize environmental impacts of the proposed Lakeville Plan Line Project have been identified in the Final Environmental Report. At this time it is the intention of the City Council to undertake these mitigation measures to the extent feasible, as identified in the mitigated Negative Declaration as the project is implemented; 7. The Council hereby finds that said unavoidable significant air quality impact, i.e., regional and local one hour nitrogen dioxide levels - 12% and 11% respective increases, are acceptable due to overriding concerns including the relative minor nature of the air quality degradation and the positive significant benefits to traffic circulation, lessening of traffic hazards, expanded economic development in the Lakeville Corridor, and reduction in environmental noise pollution due to implementation of the project. 8. The Final Study adequately describes alternatives to the proposed project, as well as all significant irreversible environmental changes which would be involved in the proposed action should it be implemented; 9. The Final Study adequately describes the cumulative and long term effects of the proposed project which might adversely affect the state of the environment. AYES: 6 NOES: 0 ABSTAIN: 1 (Hilligoss) Motion introduced by Commissioner T.encer, Seconded by Commissioner Libarle to recommend to the City Council that the proposed plan line is consistent with the Petaluma General Plan/ Environmental Design Plan. AYES: 6 NOES: 0 ABSTAIN: 1 (Hilligoss) Motion introduced by Commissioner Sobel, Seconded by Commissioner Read to recommend to the City Council adoption of the Plan Line with the following preferred intersection configurations: 1. Petroleum Avenue Cul de sac Petroleum with Baywood extended to Petroleum Ave. 2. Casa Grande Road Maintain existing skewed intersection of Casa Grande Road with Lakeville. 3. Frates Road - Cader Lane I Realign Frates Road for a 90 intersection and Cul de sac Cader Lane at such time as alternative access if available via McDowell Blvd. Extension being constructed between the Oakmead -North Bay subdivision through the Cader property. AYES: 6 NOES: 0 ABSTAIN: 1 (Hilligoss) GENERAL PLAN HEARING: VI. PROPOSED RELOCATION OF URBAN SEPARATOR, PROPOSED INCjLUSION OF ADDITIONAL PLANNED RESIDENTIAL AREA IN CITY GENERAL PLAN, EAST OF ELY BOULEVARD SOUTH (FUTURE G EXTENSION) AND SOUTH OF FRATES ROAD, DUFFEL FINANCIAL CORPORATION, (8.91) (11.746). Continuation from August 14, 1984 meeting. c 1. Adequacy of Environmental Impact Report for Lakeville Homes and Golf Course. 2. General Plan /Environmental Design Plan location Amendment to modify of urban separator to add 46 acres designation (7 du /ac) (Action of planned residential . to continue needed) . Speakers: John Wagstaff, Wagstaff and Brady Maggie Furtado, 904 Ely Blvd. So. Kallie Bechler, 2034 Crinella Drive Gerald Finton, 2047 Crinella Drive Nancy Andrews, 1065 Ely Blvd. So. Rita Cardoza, Representing the Sonoma County Farm Bureau, home address: 5869 Lakeville Highway Michael Davis, 522 Sonoma Drive John Frates, 101 Frates Road The public hearing was closed. Motion introduced by Commissioner Head, Seconded by Commissioner Perry to continue the action on the EIR to the 25, 1'984. meeting of September AYES; 7 NOES: 0 Motion by ;Commissioner Head, Seconded by Commissioner Perry to continue the public '-hearing for the General Plan EDP Amendment to the meeting of September''25, 1984. AYES 7 NOES: 0 Mr. Van Logan representing Duffel Company stated that he would have a brief presentation (refinement of Site Plan for Areas A, B, C) for the meeting of September 25, 1984. ATTEST: Warren Salmons 6 Planning Director ffig Q 120 Not Official Until Approved By The Planning Commission MINUTES Petaluma Planning Commission September 11, 1984 Regular Meeting 7:30 p.m. City Council Chambers Petaluma, California 0 PRESENT: Commissioners Head, Hilligoss, Libarle, Perry *, Read, and Sobel ABSENT: N-Cr ieNccF, STAFF: Gregory Freitas, Community Development and Planning Director Warren Salmons, Principal Planner, Mike Moore., Associate Planner, Kurt Yeiter, Associate Planner * Commissioner Perry arrived at 8:15 PM. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Minutes from the August 28 meeting were unavailable. They will be distributed in the next Planning Commission packet. CORRESPONDENCE Greg Freitas advised that Larry Tencer has been appointed to the Petaluma City Council and., therefore, can no longer hold a post on the Planning Commission. Mr. Freitas supplied - the Commissioner's with a League of California Cities handbook. DIRECTOR'S REPORT No report. COMMISSIONERS' REPORT No report. Chairman called for a study session on October 30, 1984 tentative subject to include: bed and breakfast uses, accessory dwelling ordinance amendments, adult entertainment ordinances. PUBLIC HEARINGS I. PARK PLACE UNITS I, II AND III, AMENDMENT TO EXISTING PUD UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLANS, (3.323, 11.832) (Continued from meeting of August 28, 1984) , Commission initiated, amendments to establish certain development standards. The public hearing was opened. Speakers: Mr. Keith Grimm - Park Place III. Mr. Pat Vinti - 512 Maria Drive 1. 121 The public hearing was closed. A motion was introduced by Commissioner Read and seconded by Commissioner Head that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council the adoption of a Negative Declaration based on the following findings: 1. The proposed amendments do not constitute a significant change in Ian' d use types or intensity and will not create any significant environmental impacts. 2. The proposed amendments are consistent with all applicable General G) Plan /EDP policies and zoning regulations. Go AYES: 5 NOES; 0 ABSENT: 1 (Perry) . VACANT SEAT: 1 (Tencer) Findings 1. The Development Plan clearly results in a more desirable use of land and a better physical environment that would be possible under any single district or combination of zoning districts. 2. The PUD District is proposed on property which has a suitable relationship to a thoroughfare; and said thoroughfare is adequate to carry any additional traffic generated by the development. 3. The plan for the proposed development presents a unified and organized arrangement of buildings and service facilities which are appropriate in relation to adjacent properties, and adequate landscaping is included to insure compatibility. 4. The natural and scenic qualities of the site are protected with adequate available public and private spaces designed on the Unit Development Plan. 5. The development of the subject property, in the manner proposed by the applicant, will not be detrimental to the public welfare„ will be in the best interests of the City and will be in keeping with the general intent and spirit of the zoning regulations of the City of Petaluma, with the Petaluma General Plan, and the Environmental Design Plan. Cnnrlitinn c Park Plaee Unit I 1. The original conditions of the PUD unit development plan for Park Place Unit I shall be re- adopted as part of this development plan amendment. 2. Horne Occupations shall be a permitted accessory use subject to the pertinent regulations of the City Zoning Ordinance related to Accessory Uses. 2 122 3. Private Swimming Pools shall be a permitted accessory use subject to the pertinent regulations of the City Zoning Ordinance related to `ceessarzy Uses. 4. New fences (e.g. front yard fences) shall be permitted subject to the pertinent regulations of the City Zoning Ordinance related to fences and approval of the Park Place Architectural Control Committee. 5. Detached Accessory Structures meeting the requirements of Section 301(b) (1) of the 1982 Uniform Building Code shall be permitted subject to a recorded amendment of the Park Place Unit I CC &R's approved by the Homeowner's Association. 6. Detached accessory structures shall be limited in height to 1Z stories or 15 feet. 7. Owners of Quadraplot homes shall be permitted the following modifications to. the existing residence: a. Second story additions subject to height limitations as currently permitted. b. Uncovered decks subject to the pertinent requirements of the City Zoning Ordinance related to projections into required yards. C. Bay windows, greenhouse windows and other projections subject to the requirements of the City Zoning Ordinance as stated in "b" above. 8. Owners of Zero Lot Line homes and standard single - family detached homes shall be permitted the following modifications to the existing residence: a. Room additions (including covered patios) subject to the setback requirements. b. Uncovered decks subject to the pertinent requirements of the City Zoning Ordinance related to projections into required yards. C. Bay windows, greenhouse windows and other projections subject to the requirements of the City Zoning Ordinance as stated in "b" above. 9. Any exterior modification shall be compatible in architectural styling and exterior colors and materials to the existing structure and subject to the approval of the City and the Park Place Architectural Control Committee. 10. Maximum lot coverage (including existing building and any additions) for standard detached single- family homes shall not exceed 40 percent. 11. Garage conversions are prohibited. 12. Any other. questions concerning land use regulation in Park' Place Unit I shall be governed by the City Zoning Ordinance as long as it does 3 123 not expressly conflict with the project CC, &R's or the adopted PUD unit development plan. ® Park Place Unit II 1. The original conditions of the PUD unit development plan for Park Place Unit II shall be re- adopted as part of this development plan amendment. 2. Prijvate swimming pools shall be a permitted accessory use subject to the pertinent regulations of the City Zoning Ordinance related to Accessory Uses. 00 3. New fences (e.g. front yard fences) shall be permitted subject to the pertinent regulations of the City Zoning Ordinance related to fences and approval of the Park. Place Architectural Control Committee. 4. Detached Accessory Structures meeting the requirements of Section 30ii(b) (1) of the 1982. Uniform Building Code shall be permitted subject to ;a recorded amendment of the Park Place Unit II CC &R's approved by the Homeowner's Association. 5. Owners of Quadraplot homes shall be permitted the following modifications to the existing residence: a. Second story additions subject to height limitations as currently permitted. b. Uncovered decks subject to the pertinent requirements of the City Zoning Ordinance related to projections into required yards. c. Bay windows, greenhouse windows and other projections subject to the requirements of the City Zoning Ordinance as stated in "b" above. 6. Owners of Zero Lot Line homes and standard single- family detached homes shall be permitted the following modifications to the existing residence a. Room additions (including covered patios) subject to the setback requirements. b. Uncovered decks subject to the pertinent requirements of the City Zoning Ordinance related to projections into required yards. C. Bay windows, greenhouse windows and other projections subject to the requirements of the City Zoning Ordinance as stated in "b ", above. 7. Owners of Common Wall homes shall be permitted the following modifications to the existing residence: a. Uncovered decks subject to the_ pertinent requirements of the City Zoning Ordinance related to projections into rear yards. 4 124 b. Bay windows, greenhouse windows and . other projections subject to the requirements of the City Zoning Ordinance as stated in "b ", above. 8. Any exterior modification shall- be compatible in architectural styling and exterior colors and materials to the existing structure and subject to the approval of the City and the Park Place Architectural Control Committee. 9. Maximum lot coverage (including existing building and any additions) for standard detached single homes shall not exceed 40 percent. 10. Garage conversions are prohibited. 11. Any other questions concerning land use regulation in Park Place Unit II shall be governed by the City Zoning Ordinance as long as it does not expressly conflict with the project CC &R's or the adopted PUD unit development plan. Park Place III 1. The original conditions of the PUD unit development plan for Park Place Unit III shall be re- adopted as part of this development plan amendment. Home Occupations shall be a per.mi'tted accessory use subject to the pertinent regulations of the City Zoning Ordinance related to Accessory Uses. 3. Private Swimming Pools shall be a permitted accessory use subject to the pertinent regulations of the City Zoning Ordinance related to Accessory Uses. 4. New fences (e.g. front yard fences) shall be permitted subject to the pertinent regulations of the City Zoning Ordinance related to fences and approval of the Park Place Architectural Control Committee. 5. Detached. Accessory Structures meeting the requirements of Section 301(b) (1) of the 1982 Uniform Building Code shall be permitted subject to a recorded amendment of the Park Place Unit III CC &R's approved by the Homeowner's Association. 6. Owners of Quadraplot homes shall be permitted the following modifications to the existing residence: a. Second story additions subject to height limitations as currently permitted . b. Uncovered decks subject to the pertinent requirements of the City Zoning Ordinance related to projections into required yards. C. Bay windows:, greenhouse windows and other projections subject to the requirements of the City Zoning Ordinance as stated in "b ", above. 5 QUO 1!D5 7. Owners of Zero Lot Line homes and standard single- family detached homes shall - be permitted the following modifications to the existing residence: a.. Room additions (including covered patios) subject to the setback requirements. b. Uncovered decks subject to the pertinent requirements of the City Zoning Ordinance reZated to projections into required yards. c. Bay windows, greenhouse windows and other projections subject to the requirements of the City Zoning Ordinance as stated in "b ", above. 8. Owners of Common Wall homes shall be permitted the following modifications to the existing residence: a. Uncovered decks subject to the pertinent requirements of the City Zoning Ordinance reZated to projections into required yards. b. Bay windows, greenhouse windows and other projections subject to the requirements of the City Zoning Ordinance as stated in "b ", above. 9. Any, exterior modification shall be compatible in architectural styling and colors and materials 'to the existing structure and subject to :the approval of the City and the Park Place Architectural Control Committee. 1 Maximum lot coverage (including existing building and any additions) for;.;standard detached single- family homes shall not exceed 40 percent. i 11. Garage conversions are prohibited. 12. Any other questions concerning land use regulation in Park Place Unit J III ,shall be governed by the City Zoning Ordinance as long as it does not expressly conflict with the project CC &R's or the adopted PUD unit development plan. A motion was introduced by Commissioner Read and seconded by Commissioner Head that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council adoption of the respective amendments to the PUD unit development plans for Park Place Units 1, 2, and 3 subject to the findings and conditions of the staff report as amended and listed below. AYES: 5 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 1 (Perry) VACANT SEAT: 1 (Tencer) II. MORNING STAR SUBDIVISION UNITS I -VI, AND SUNRISE SUBDIVISION, AMENDMENT TO EXISTING PUD UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLANS, (3.324, 11.833) . i Commission initiated amendments to establish standards The public hearing was opened. Speakers: Mike Goakey - 105 Marvin Court Brian Butcher - 14`64 Sunrise Parkway Terry Gertsen - 117 Marvin Court The public hearing was closed. f } certain development Note.: The Commission noted one change on the Morningstar standards matrix and two on the Sunrise. Matrix to clarify setback and accessory structure height limit standards. A motion was made by Commissioner Sobel and seconded by Commissioner, Libarle that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council that a Negative Declaration be approved for Morningstar Units I through VI based on the findings of the- staff report as follows: 1. The. proposed unit development plan amendments do not create any significant environmental impacts. 2. The amendments are consistent with, all applicable General. Plan /EDP policies and land use designations. AYES: 5 NOES;: 0 ABSTAIN: 1 (Perry) ABSENT SEAT: 1 (T.encer) A. motion was made by Commissioner Read and seconded by Commissioner Head that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council that a Negative Declaration be approved for Sunrise Units I and II based on the findings of the staff report as outlined above. AYES: 5 NOES:: 0 ABSTAIN 1 (Perry) ABSENT SEAT: 1 (Tender) A motion was made by Commissioner Sobel and seconded by Commissioner Libarle . that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council that it adopt the respective amendments to the PUD unit development plans for Morningstar Units ,I through. VI s,ubj;ect to the findings and conditions of in the staff report as amended and listed below: Findings I. The Development Plans clearly result 'in a more desirable use of land and a better physical environment than would be possible under any single district or combination of zoning districts. 2. The PU,D District is proposed on property which has a suitable, relationship to a. thoroughfare;. and said . thoroughfare is adequate to carry any additional traffic generated by th development. 7. 127 3. The plans for the developments present a unified and organized arrangement of buildings and service facilities which are appropriate in relation to adjacent properties, and adequate landscaping is included to insure compatibility. 4. The natural and scenic qualities of the site are protected with adequate available public and private spaces designed on the Unit Development Plan. 5. The development of the subject property, in the manner proposed by the; applicant, will not be detrimental to the public welfare, will be in he best interests of the City and will be in keeping with the general 0) intent and spirit of the zoning regulations of the City of Petaluma, 00 with the Petaluma General Plan, and the Environmental Design Plan. u Conditions Morningstar Units I through VI 1. The original conditions of the PUD unit development plan for Morningstar Units I through VI shall be re- adopted as part of this development plan amendment. 2. Private swimming pools shall be a permitted accessory use subject to the' pertinent regulations of the City Zoning Ordinance related to Accessory Uses. 3. New fences (e.g. front yard fences) shall be permitted subject to the pertinent regulations of the City Zoning Ordinance related to fences ands approval of the Morningstar Architectural Control Committee. 4. Detached Accessory Structures meeting the requirements of Section 301,(b) (1) of the 1.982 Uniform Building Code shall be permitted subject to a recorded amendment of the Morningstar I through VI CC &R's approved by the Homeowner's Association. 5. Detached accessory structures shall be limited in height to 11 stories or 45 feet. 6. Homeowners shall be permitted the following modifications to the existing residence: a. Room additions (including covered patios) subject to the setback r requirements. b. Uncovered decks subject to the pertinent ,requirements of the City Zoning Ordinance related to projections into required yard area. c. Bay windows, greenhouse windows and other projections subject to the requirements of the City Zoning Ordinance as stated in "b".. above. 7. Any exterior modification shall be compatible in architectural styling and exterior colors and materials to the existing structure and subject to the approval of the City and the Morningstar Architectural Control Committee. 8. Maximum lot coverage shall not exceed 40 percent. 9. Garage conversions are prohibited. 10. Any other questions concerning land use regulation in Morningstar Units I through VI shall be governed by the City Zoning Ordinance as long as it does not expressly conflict with the project CC &R's or the adopted PUD unit development plan. AYES: 5 NOES: 0 ABSTAIN: 1 (Perry) ABSENT SEAT: 1 (Tencer) A motion was made by Commissioner Read and seconded by Commissioner Head that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council that it adopt the respective amendments to the PUD unit development plans for Sunrise Units I and II subject to the findings and conditions listed in the staff report as follows: Findings 1. The Development Plans clearly result in a more desirable use of land and a better physical environment that would be possible under any single district,or combination of zoning districts. 2. The PUD District is proposed on property which has a suitable relationship to a :thoroughfare; and said thoroughfare is adequate to carry any additional traffic generated by. the development. 3. The - plans for the developments present a unified and organized arrangement of buildings and service facilities which are appropriate in relation to .adjacent properties, and adequate landscaping is included to insure compatibility. 4. The natural and scenic qualities of the site are protected with adequate available public and private spaces designed on the Unit Development Plan. 5. The development of the subject property, in the manner proposed by the applicant, will not 'be detrimental to the p.ublic' welfare, will be in .the best interests of the City and will be in keeping with the general intent and spirit of the zoning regulations of the City of Petaluma, with the Petaluma General Plan., and the Environmental Design Plan. Conditions 1. The original conditions of the PUD. unit development plan for Sunrise Units I and II shall , be re- adopted as part of this development plan amendment. 9 129 2. Home Occupations shall be a permitted accessory use subject to the pertinent regulations of the City Zoning Ordinance related to accessory uses. 3. Private Swimming Pools shall be a permitted accessory use subject to the pertinent regulations of the City Zoning Ordinance related to accessory uses. 4. New fences (e.g. front yard fences.) shall be permitted subject to the regulations of the City Zoning Ordinance and approval of the Sunrise Architectural Control Committee. 5. Detached Accessory Structures meeting the requirements of Section 00 301(b) (1) of the 1982 Uniform Building Code shall be permitted subject Iq to � a recorded amendment of the Sunrise CC &R's approved by the U Homeowner's Association. 6. Detached accessory structures shall be limited in height to 11 stories or 15 feet. 7. Homeowners shall be permitted the following modifications to the existing residence: a. Room additions (including covered patios) subject to the setback requirements. b. Uncovered decks subject to the pertinent requirements of the City Zoning Ordinance related to projections into required yard areas. c. Bay windows, greenhouse windows and other projections subject to the requirements of the City Zoning Ordinance as stated in "b ", above. 8. Any exterior modification shall be compatible in architectural styling ands exterior colors and materials to the existing structure and subject to the approval of the City and the Sunrise Architectural Control Committee. 9. Maximum lot coverage (including existing building and any additions) shall not exceed 40 percent. 10. Garage conversions are prohibited. 11. Any other questions concerning land use regulation in Sunrise shall be governed by the City Zoning Ordinance as long . as it does not expressly conflict with the project CC &R's or the adopted PUD unit development plan. AYES: 5 NOES: 0 ABSTAIN: 1 (Perry) ABSENT SEAT: 1 ('fencer) III. MISCELLANEOUS PUD REZONINGS (3.325, 11.834) . 10 130 1. 2. 3. 2. Rezoning of selected properties and subdivisions. The public hearing was opened. Speakers: Eve Brough - 308 Sherri Ct. Al Wolsko - 1518 Anna Way Michell Wester- 1515 Anna Way Barbara Wolsko - 1518 Anna Way Laurie Thornton - O'Neel Drive James Howard - 16,1.5 Juliet Jack Schwartz - 23 Halsey Ave. Bob Brilley - Sunnyhills Subdivision (no address available) The public hearing was closed. A motion was made by Commissioner Libarle and seconded by Commissioner Head that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council that a Negative Declaration be adopted based on the findings of the staff report as follows: The rezoning,s will not result in a more intense use of the eland that would. lead to any significant environmental impacts. Development of the vacant parcels will still be subject to review by the City at which time any apparent significant impacts would be mitigated. The rezonings are consistent with all applicable General Plan policies and land u'se designations. AYES: 6 NOES: 0 ABSTAIN 0 ABSENT SEAT: 1 (Tencer) A motion was made by Commissioner Head and seconded by Commissioner Libarle that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council that it adopt the rezoning actions as specified in the staff report as follows: From PU.D (Planned Unit District) to R -1 -6500 (Single- Family Residential) : a) Sunnyhills subdivision b) Assessor's Parcel Numbers 008- 510 -68, 69 and 70 of the Pacheco subdivision c) Assessor's Parcel Numbers 0:07 - 570 -15, 16, 18 and 21 d) Assessor's Parcel .Numbers 017 - 040 -06 and 13 e) Assessor's Parcel Number 017- 060 -20 From PUD (Planned Unit District) to R-1-10,000 (Single- Family Residential) a. The remainder of the Pacheco subdivision (AP No.'s 008 - 510 -60 through 67) . AYES: 6 NOES: 0 ABSTAIN: 0 11 lwili ABSENT SEAT: 1 (Tencer) A motion has made by Commissioner Head and seconded by Commissioner Sobel that the Planning Commission vote to continue rezoning of Greenb.riar subdivision and of properties located between Hinman and Fair Streets until the meeting of October 9, 1984. AYES: 6 NOES: 0 ABSTAIN: 0 ABSENT SEAT: 1 (Tencer) CD IV. USE PERMIT FOR WAREHOUSING AND STORAGE IN A C -H ZONE, 331 PETALUMA BLVD. NORTH (Formerly Hansen's Interiors) 00 (This item was listed as No. V on the Agenda but was moved to No. IV) Use Permit to allow a portion of building to be used for storage assciated with Gulick's Auto Body and Lombardi's Bakery. The public hearing was opened. Speaker: Tom Baker - 511 D Street The public hearing was closed. A motion was made by Commissioner Head and seconded by Commissioner Libarle that the Planning Commission approve the use permit subject to the findings and conditions in the staff report as follows: 1. Aside from the retail sales and office portions, the building shall be used for storage only and not for the expansion of any new or existing operations associated with Gulick's or Lombardi's. t 2. Any exterior modifications shall be subject to SPARC approval. 3. No signs advertising Gulick's or Lombardi's shall be placed on the building and existing signs on the building at 33.1 Petaluma Blvd. No. shall be removed within 10 days of use permit approval. 4. Use of the designated retail sales and office space in the building shall be subject to the provisions of the C -H zone (Article 13) and any other applicable zoning regulations. 5. Delivery vehicles shall not park in the Petaluma Blvd. travel lanes while delivering or removing materials, cars, etc. AYE'S: 6 NOES: 0 ABSTAIN: 0 ABSENT SEAT: 1 (Tencer) V. EIQ , (11.586) PUD Rezone (3.319) ,. Tentative Map (6.604) , McBail Company. (Ely Boulevard to Maria Drive at Lynch Creek. AP No. 136- ;111 -13, 16, 17, 20 and 21. r . 12 132 The public hearing was opened. Speakers: Mike Gallagher - McBail Company Representative The public hearing was closed. A motion was made by Commissioner Head and seconded by Commissioner Sobel that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of a Negative Declaration subject to the findings specified in the staff report as follows: Findings I. No indications of archaeological resources are presented on —site. 2. Additional air pollution generated by the project is not expected to exceed permissible standards. 3. Proposed development is not expected to have a significant impact on rare or endangered wild -life habitats. 4. Projected traffic generation is not expected to impact neighboring streets beyond their planned capacity because adequate mitigation measures are incorporated in the conditions of approval. 5. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements therefore will not cause. substantial environmental damage, and no substantial or avoidable injury will occur to fish or wildlife or their habitat. 6. The design of the Subdivision and the type of improvements will not cause serious public health problems. 7. The design of .the; Subdivision and the type of improvements proposed will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at. large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. 8. The discharge of ,waste from the _proposed subdivision into the existing community sewer system will not result inviolation of the existing requirements prescribed by the Regional Water Quality Control Board. AYES: 6 NOES: 0 ABSTAIN: 0 ABSENT SEAT: 1 (Tencer) A motion was made by .Commissioner 'Head and seconded .by Commissioner Libarle that the Planning, Commission recommend approval to the City Council -of the proposed PUD rezone development plan for the 132 -unit townhome project subject to the findings and conditions listed in the staff report as follows; Findings For PUD 1. The PUD District is proposed on property which has a suitable relationship to one (.1) or more thoroughfares; and that said 13 133 thoroughfares are adequate to carry any additional traffic generated by the development. 2. The plan for the proposed .development presents a unified and organized arrangement of buildings and service facilities which are appropriate in relation to adjacent or nearby properties and that adequate landscaping and /or screening is included to insure compatibility. 3. The natural and scenic qualities of the site are protected, with adequate available public and private spaces designated on the Unit Development Plan. 00 4. The development of the subject property, in the manner proposed by I' the applicant and conditioned by the City, will not be detrimental to C) the public welfare, will be in the best interests of the City and will be ED in keeping with the general intent and spirit of the zoning regulation of the City of Petaluma, with the Petaluma General Plan, and with any applicable Environmental Design Plans adopted by the City. Conditions For PUD : 1. The development plan, including location and design of all primary and accessory buildings, fences, walls, parking spaces, pathways, landscaping in non - enclosed areas, building colors, bicycle paths, trash bin enclosures, mailbox kiosks, public accessways, and recreation areas shall be subject to review and approval by the Site Plan And Architectural Review Committee (SPARC) pursuant to Zoning Ordinance Section 26 -401. 2. Shelters for patrons of public transportation shall not be constructed unless specifically requested by the Transit Coordinator prior to City issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the last dwelling unit of this pro 3. Conditions, covenants and restrictions shall be drafted for the subdivision and shall be subject to approval by the Community Development and Planning Department and the City Attorney. 1 HdV lYo FHAY l ➢WW l A�/9WdVIT. Such approved and recordable CC &R's shall be forwarded by the Director of Planning to the City Engineer for recordation �{ /tlH� /��d�k/ krh�/ �hEY ldifik�lelrl /a/s/ fthler /fd�hX /rfi /. Changes to the .proposed CC &R's which shall be incorporated therein prior to staff approval shall include provisions for City approval of development standards and any future changes thereto, allowable uses, restrictions and'',other regulations of concern to the City. 4. The, applicant shall provide a perpetual maintenance agreement for the private maintenance of all landscaping and irrigation installed within the ;public right -of -way subject to approval of appropriate City staff prior to Final Map approval. 5. Prior to SPARC approval of the development plan, approval from applicable abutting property owners shall be obtained to install "buffer 14 134 between projects" improvements as shown on he proposed development plan. 6. The applicant shall atfihO offer for relocation the existing house and out buildings located on the Elsie Corry Life Estate prior to commencement of Phase IV 7. The bicycle path, and any other improvements , proposed within the Lynch Creek right -of -way shall all be completed at one time, including those in Phase. IV (The Life Estate) . 8. The development plan and public improvement plans shall depict pedestrian access from Lord Barande Drive to the Lynch Creek bicycle path in at least two locations. Additional access for maintenance vehicles shall be shown pursuant to the requirements of the City Engineer. 9. The project CC &R's shall include provisions for the maintenance of detention basin areas by the Homeowner's Association or, in the event there. is no active association, the property owners, following times of flooding. 10. All existing trees which are to remain shall be protected during construction and, grading,. All existing trees which were slated to remain but are removed., destroyed,, or weakened so that death a consequence of construction or grading shall be replaced by a specimen tree to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development and Planning, 11. The seven parking spaces on Acadia Drive shall be omitted. The remaining area shall be improved with landscaping and sidewalks to the satisfaction of the City Staff. 12. All units not supplied with a twenty (20) foot long driveway shall be equipped with automatic garage door openers with two remote control openers. 13. The project CC &R's shall prohibit' auto parking in the street. The street shall be posted with "no parking" signs to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 14, The parking of recreational vehicles including boats, outside of the designated RV storage area is prohibited unless contained entirely within a garage. The project CC &;R's shall reflect this prohibition. 15. The project shall provide handicapped units in accordance with city and state laws. 16. The development plan shall be revised to. reflect walkways connecting open parking areas to building clusters subject to SPARC review. 17. All onsite improvements shall be constructed to the satisfaction of the city staff. 15 1W3 19. Any, changes to the Village Meadows 18. The following development standards shall apply to this subdivision, approval shall be reflected on a new and shall be reflected in the project CC &R's and revised development provided to the Department of plan: within thirty (30) working days after approval of such change. a. Conversions of garages for living areas is prohibited. to SPARC approval. Said b. Home occupations are governed by applicable City Zoning preserve the appearance of openness along those areas not facing Ordinances or project CC &R's, whichever are more stringent. reviewed for its ability to screen C. All building additions and modifications are subject only to SPARC right-of-ways. approval provided that the application is approved by the ABSENT SEAT: 1 (Tencer) Homeowner's Association. d. Minor building modifications (e.g. greenhouse windows, new window sizes, security bars on windows, uncovered decks, spas, U walkways, etc.) may be approved by the Director of Community Development and Planning pursuant to Zoning Ordinance Section 26 -401 provided, however, that. application for such changes are approved by the Homeowner's Association. 19. Any, changes to the Village Meadows tentative map and /or development plan made pursuant to these conditions or SPARC conditions of approval shall be reflected on a new map and /or plan, a sepia print and one copy of which shall be provided to the Department of Community Development and Planning within thirty (30) working days after approval of such change. The means for satisfying this 20. Fencing on the project perimeter is subject to SPARC approval. Said fencing shall be placed, wherever possible., between buildings to preserve the appearance of openness along those areas not facing public streets. Fencing shall also be reviewed for its ability to screen private driveways from public view and view from private street right-of-ways. 21. No driveways shall be of a length between 10 and 17 feet to discourage the parking of automobiles with overhangs into street areas. 22. The tentative map shall be revised to comply with the requirements of the .Fire Marshal as outlined in the attached correspondence. 23. The suggested mitigation measures outlined in the attached noise study and traffic report shall be 'incorporated into the project design to the satisfaction of staff. 24. Thee applicant shall satisfy City General PZan policies and programs with. regard to providing housing, land, in -lieu fees, or alternate measures for affordable to very Zow, Zow, and moderate income households. The means for satisfying this requirement shall be developed in consultation with City staff and ratified by the City Council concurrent with final map approval. AYES: 6 NOES: 0 ABSTAIN: 0 ABSENT SEAT: 1 (Tencer) 16 136 A motion was made by Commissioner Head and seconded by Commissioner Sobel that the Planning Commission recommend approval to the City Council of the proposed tentative map for the 132 -unit townhome project subject to the findings and conditions listed in the staff report with the following changes Findings For Tentative Map 1. The proposed subdivision, together with provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan. 2. The proposed subdivision is compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses, and programs specified in said General Plan. 3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed.. 4. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. 5. The proposed subdivision has incorporated adequate use of solar energy fff6IhW 11144 149%a!slshbUd/ hkAl Aidtkr/ Hdddlie /s/ dt 4dd. 6. The tentative :map provides reasonable public access from a public road to that portion of the bank of the stream lying within the proposed subdivision. Conditions For Tentative Map 1. The phasing plan depicted on the tentative map shall be modified to include completion of Lord 'Barande Drive no later than Phase Two. 2. Drainage design plans shall be approved by the City Engineer and shall conform with the Sonoma County Water Agency . Design Criteria. Grading plans shall be submitted to and approved by ap:prOpriate City staff prior to issuance of building permits for such construction. 3. Public utility access and easement locations and widths shall be subject to approval by P..G. & E. Pacific 'Telephone and the City Engineer and shall be shown on the Final Map as needed. The applicant shall abide by the requirements of P..G. & E. as stated in the attached letter dated May 13, 1984. All utilities shall be placed underground. 4. Turn -out lanes for public transportation shall be shown on the final map, improvement and development plans.. The location and design of these turn -outs shall be subject to approval of City staff'. 5. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City Engineer outlined in the attached correspondence. 6. All streets in the project shall be subject to approval by the Street Naming Committee. 17 137 7. The applicant shall provide an irrevocable offer of dedication to the City for the portion of Lynch Creek right -of -way between the bicycle path and southeastern property line, inclusive. The bicycle ,path shall be continuously maintained by the Homeowner's Association. 8. Prior. to the filing of a Final Map, the applicant shall provide a hydrologic study of Lynch Creek. The City shall not accept dedication of the Lynch Creek right -of -way unless the Lynch Creek basin is shown to be hydrologically adequate to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Sonoma County Water Agency. Any corrective work or improvements necessary to make the creek basin hydrologically adequate shall be completed by he applicant to City specifications. 0) Removal of the existing riparian habitat shall not be allowed as a basin 00 improvement but rather the developer shall construct, if necessary, a Iq pipe parallel to the existing stream from Ely Boulevard to Maria Drive that will carry a portion of the flow across the project site C) representing the excess quantity of water flow beyond the basin capacity. . Q 9. The applicant shall diligently pursue, to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development, the acquisition and dedication to the City of those properties or portions of properties containing the proposed . bicycle path in the Lynch Creek right -of -way designated on the map as the properties of Keokuk Hospitals, Inc., and Qantas Development Corporation. 10. The applicant shall provide, prior to filing of a final map, calculations by ;a qualified engineer showing that the design of the detention basins meet the requirements of the City Engineer and applicable city ordinances. Said calculations must be approved by the City Engineer prior to the recordation of the final map. X I // / THd / A�J:AYdd* / bhkdY / Akfi/s/f&/ MO/ M ihW / Plii/ /061ft ldd / IaHd / �/rh/g(IhHi )WIAI /idgd$d/ ltld l plrhMli k1 IW" -A�/,/ /- YdridI / lil-�LAIdtt l /fkk,9l,l 16f lall,t H hU 6*A/ s1u/Ve/d /fW HdVdiH9 /af�f,bHdYdVW AV,/ MdVY NoN I /16W l Uiiff/ NddiiiYd hHddr/ i Wb{ lskBdlW./ / / 11741/ /dikh/sl 1 lfbkl / hhfi!df/yU4 / Itd-Abl / fkh;G hHddtl / /s/htalll l NJ &WOb11/ / Yd l khHdillltAfY l Niltbl l Wd l /dtb it / a ( rid / hidthfi/e/d / bhJ / hhkl / Md SCkk*idid / Uiih h1r1rkHt1 Nihhl fUiY /riikl hpl�VdVdll. 11. 121 During the course of development, if archaeological materials are found, all work in the vicinity of the find(s) shall be stopped and a qualified archaeologist contacted to evaluate the materials and make recommendations for mitigation as deemed necessary. 12. 131 The tentative map shall be revised to comply with the requirements of the 'Fire Marshal as outlined in the attached correspondence. 13. 141 Applicant is advised that the development may be subject to future charges for a Public Improvement Benefit District pursuant to Chapter 13.3'4 of the Petaluma Municipal Code:, in order to provide needed future improvements to Rainier Avenue or the proposed Rainier Avenue overpass which will service the project area. 18 138 14. SOZar assisted water heating systems or other energy conservator devices shaZZ be incorporated into the buiZding design to the saw sfactzon of the Director of Community DeveZopment and rZanr:ing. AYES: 6 NOES: 0 ABSTAIN: 0 ABSENT SEAT: 1 (Tencer) ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 11:15 p.m. ATTEST: s, Warren Salmons Planning Director 1 19 .