HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 10/23/19840:00150
Not Official Until Approved
By The Planning Commission
MINUTES
Petaluma Planning Commission October 23:, 1984
Regular Meeting 7:30 p.m.
City Council Chambers Petaluma, California
PRESENT: Commissioners Head, Hilligoss, Perry *, Read, Serpilio and
Sobel
ABSENT: Commissioner Libarle
STAFF: Warren Salmons, Community Development and Planning Director
Mike Moore, Associate Planner
Kurt Yeiter, Associate Planner
* Commissioner 'Perry arrived 8.:05.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES Minutes from the meeting of October 9', 1984
o were approved as published.
CORRESPONDENCE None.
DIRECT:OR'S REPOR Discussion of agenda for 10/30 Special Meeting-.
Brief discussion of -Special Meeting- details by Warren . Sal`mons,.
Commissioner Read requested inclusions to agenda of Special
Meeting: Accessory Dwellings and Rules of Order.
COMMISSIONERS' REPORT None
NOTE: Stri'ke -Out Type (//,/) = Deletion
Underline Type = Addition
GENERAL PLAN HEARING
Note: This item was listed on the Agenda as Item II but was presented as
- Item I at the meeting.
I. ARN.OLDS INTERIORS, G. Arnold Partridge, 331 Petaluma Blvd. N.
(1.447).
1. Consideration of Use Permit for an upholstery business.
The Public Hearing was opened.
Speakers: Arnold Partridge - Applicant
1
The Public Hearing was closed.
A motion was made by. Commissioner Sobel and seconded by Commissioner
Head to approve a Conditional Use Permit for an upholstery business at 331
Petaluma Boulevard North subject to the recommended conditions in the staff
report._
AYES: 5 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 2 (Libarle, Perry)
RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of a conditional use permit
for an upholstery business at 331 Petaluma Boulevard North involving not
more than frbl le�iA( Idyiis three and one -half employees working five days
per week, subject to the following conditions:
00
q Conditions
co U 1. The use shall not involve any outdoor storage of materials, trash, trash
bins, merchandise, furniture, or tools.
2. Deliveries and pick -up of merchandise - by employees shall be limited to
Saturdays only. Delivery /pick -up vehicles shall not double -park on the
street or block access driveways to businesses not located in the same
building.
3. There will be no retail sales at the project site.
4. Any modification to the front windows, other than drapes, shutters or
blinds, shall be subject to administrative SPARC review pursuant to Zoning
Ordinance Section 26 -401.
5. All existing or future outdoor mechanical equipment shall be fully
visually ;screened upon installation subject to the approval of the Community
Development Department.
6. Any outdoor advertising signs shall be submitted for review and
approval- of the Community Development Department. A sign permit is
necessary for any new signs. All existing nonconforming signs shall be
removed within ten (10) days after approval of this use - permit.
7. Proper area separation within the project building shall be maintained
per Chapter 5 of the 1982 Uniform Building Code.
8. Approval for the proposed use shall be obtained from the Fire Marshal
prior to :occupancy of the building.
Note: This item was originally scheduled as Agenda Item III but was moved
to Item II.
II. DOMINO's PIZZA, David McClain, in the portion of Washington Square
Shopping Center near the corner of McGregor and S. McDowell Blvd.
(1.443).
157
2
i
1. Consideration of Use Permit for fast food restaurant.
The Public Hearing was opened.
* Commissioner Perry arrived.
Speakers: David McClain - applicant
The Public Hearing was closed.
A motion was made by Commissioner. Head and seconded by Commissioner
Perry for approval the use permit subject to the recommended conditions in
the staff report as revised.
AYES: 6
CONDITIO;N'S
NOES: 0 ABSENT: 1 (Libarle)
(YibHhbAh0 /,bf / tlhk/ Udt6l The _delivery vehicles shall be arked in the_; lot
at the back door side (northeast) before 9 PM and ma be moved to the
-
f ront of the building after 9 PM..
2. All existing and, upon, installation,, all future outdoor mechanical
equipment shall be fully visually screened subject to the approval of the
Community Development Department.
3 Any outdoor advertising signs shall be submitted for review and
approval of the Community Development Department. A sign permit is
required.
4. Any remodeling of the store front shall be subject to -SPARC review and
interior remodeling shall be subject to approval of the Building Inspector
and Fire Marshal.
5. Hours of operation shall be 11:00 a.m. to 1.:00 a.m. Sunday through
Thursday and 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. Friday and Saturday.
6. This use shall be subject to review and reconsideration after one year of
operation.
Note: The following item was, originally listed as Item I but was delayed to
Item III for full Commission consideration.
III. PROPOSED RELOCATION OF URBAN SEPARATOR, PROPOSED
INCLUSION . OF ADDITIONAL PLANNED RESIDENTIAL AREA IN CITY
GENERAL PLAN, EAST OF ELY BOULEVARD SOUTH (FUTURE EXTENSION)
AND SOUTH QF FRATES ROAD, DUFFEL FINANCIAL CORPORATION,.
(8.91, 11.746).
Continuation from August 28, 1984 meeting.
3
159
1. General Plan/ Environmental Design Plan Amendment, to modify location of
urban separator to add 46 acres of planned residential designation (7
du /ac) .
The Public Hearing was opened.
Speakers: Van Logan - Duffel Corporation
Rita Cardoza - (as member of agricultural community)
Paul Martin - Sonoma County Farm Bureau Representative
Lyn Woolsey - 923 B Street
The Planning Commission requested more information from staff on the
following items:
1. Water systems (storm water bypass, etc.) costs, etc.
2. Revenue generated in relation to service costs.
3 Annexation policies (developer's road improvement - costs, etc.)
IV. PARK PLACE UNIT IV, Qantas Development Corporation, Ely Blvd.,
N. and extension of Rainier Avenue.' (3.283, 6.593, 11.723) .
1. Consideration of EIQ.
2. Consideration of PUD rezoning for a 172 -lot single- family
residential subdivision.
3. Consideration of Tentative Map for the above subdivision.
The Public Hearing was opened.
Speakers: Art Cader - 1315. Ely Road
Ernie Curtis - 1277 Ely Road
Treumann Horton - 901 St.,-Francis Drive (Church of Christ)
t
Nancy McClennan - address. unavailable
Jon Joslyn - Qantas Development. Corporation
The Public Hearing was closed.
A motion was made by Commissioner Read and seconded by Commissioner
Sobel toy recommend to the City Council approval of a Negative Declaration
subject 'to the findings in the staff report.
4
The Public Hearing
was not closed.
M
'q
A motion was made
by Commissioner
Perry and -seconded by Commissioner
0
Head to continue action
on this item
to the Planning Commission meeting of
November 13, 1984.
AYES: 5
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 1 (Libarle)
ABSTAIN: 1
(Serpilio)
The Planning Commission requested more information from staff on the
following items:
1. Water systems (storm water bypass, etc.) costs, etc.
2. Revenue generated in relation to service costs.
3 Annexation policies (developer's road improvement - costs, etc.)
IV. PARK PLACE UNIT IV, Qantas Development Corporation, Ely Blvd.,
N. and extension of Rainier Avenue.' (3.283, 6.593, 11.723) .
1. Consideration of EIQ.
2. Consideration of PUD rezoning for a 172 -lot single- family
residential subdivision.
3. Consideration of Tentative Map for the above subdivision.
The Public Hearing was opened.
Speakers: Art Cader - 1315. Ely Road
Ernie Curtis - 1277 Ely Road
Treumann Horton - 901 St.,-Francis Drive (Church of Christ)
t
Nancy McClennan - address. unavailable
Jon Joslyn - Qantas Development. Corporation
The Public Hearing was closed.
A motion was made by Commissioner Read and seconded by Commissioner
Sobel toy recommend to the City Council approval of a Negative Declaration
subject 'to the findings in the staff report.
4
160
AYES: 6 NOES: . _0 ABSENT: 1 (Libarle)
Findings:
1.. _The project is consistent with 'applicable General Plan /EDP guidelines
and` policies and zoning regulaions.
2. The project area is. covered by the City of Petaluma Master
Environmental Impact Report and a specific project EIR for the original PCD
zoning.
3. An additional study of traffic and air quality and noise was done to
update the findings of the previous environmental documentation.
4.. The project is compatible with surrounding land uses and conditions of
approval should mitigate any significant impacts.
A motion was made by Commissioner Perry and seconded by Commissioner
Serpilio to recommend to the, City Council approval of the prop_ osed PUD
Rezoning for Park Place Unit IV subject to the findings and conditions
listed in the staff report.
AYES: 1 6
Findings
NOES: 0 ABSENT: 1 (Libarle)
1. Said plan clearly results in a more desirable use of land and a better
physical environment than would be possible under any , single zoning
district or combination of zoning districts.
2.. That any PUD District is proposed on property which has a suitable
relationship to one ,(1) or more thor..oughfares; and that. said . thoroughfares are adequate to carry :any additional traffic generated by the development.
3. That the plan for the proposed development presents a unified and
organized arrangement of buildings and service facilities which are
appropriate in relation to adjacent or nearby properties -and that adequate
landscaping and/or screening is included if necessary to insure
compatibility.
4. That the natural and scenic qualities of the site are protected, with
adequate available public and private spaces designated on the Unit
Development Plan.
5. That the development of the subject .property, in the manner proposed
by the applicant, will not be detrimental to the public welfare, will be in
the best interests of the City and will be in keeping with the general 'intent
and spirit of' the zoning regulation of the City of Petaluma, with the
Petaluma General Plan, and with any applicable Environmental Design Plans
adopted: by the City.
Conditions
L �I
5
161
1. The project CC &R's (conditions, covenants and restrictions,) shall be
amended to add references regarding, development standards which shall
become conditions of zoning approval, including:
A. Minimum building, setbacks shall be as follows:
Detached, single- family - front: 20 feet; side: 5 feet (one
side) , 15 feet (aggregate) ; rear: 20 feet.
Quadraplots - front: 10 feet; side: 5 feet (one side) , 15 feet
(aggregate); rear: 20 feet.
CD B. Home Occupations shall be a permitted accessory use subject
co to the pertinent regulations of the City Zoning Ordinance
qzT related to Accessory Uses.
C. Private Swimming Pools shall be a permitted accessory use
subject to the pertinent regulations of the City Zoning
Ordinance related to Accessory Uses.
D. New fences (e.g. front yard fences) shall be permitted
subject to the pertinent regulations of the City Zoning
Ordinance related to. fences and approval of the Park Place
Architectural Control Committee.
E. Detached Accessory Structures meeting the requirements of
Section 301(b)(1) of the 1982 Uniform Building Code shall be
permitted.
F. Owners of Quadraplot homes shall be permitted the following
modifications to the existing residence:
1. Second story additions subject to height limitations as
currently permitted.
2. Uncovered decks subject to the pertinent requirements
of the City Zoning Ordinance related to projections into
required yards.
3. Bay windows, greenhouse windows and other projections
subject to the requirements of the City Zoning
Ordinance as stated in ' -2" , above.
G. Owners of standard single - family detached homes shall be
permitted the following modifications to the existing residence:
1. Room additions (including covered patios) subject to the
setback requirements as stated in I.A.
2. Uncovered decks subject to the pertinent requirements
of the City Zoning Ordinance related to projections into
required yards.
I
162
3. Bay windows, greenhouse windows and other projects
subject to the . requirements of the City Zoning
Ordinance as stated in " G -2" , " above .
H. Any exterior modifications shall be compatible in architectural
styling and exterior colors and materials to the existing
structure and subject to the approval '
f the City and the
Park Place Architectural Control Committee.
I. Maximum lot coverage (including existing building and any
additions) for standard detached single- family homes shall
not exceed 40 percent.
J. Garage conversions are prohibited.
K. Any other questions concerning land use regulation in Park
Place Unit IV shall be governed by the City Zoning
Ordinance as long as it does' not expressly conflict with the
project CC &R's or the adopted PUD unit development plan.
2. The
project sponsor shall 'be required to 'pay low and
moderate
income
housing
in -lieu fees of an amount to be determined according
to the
schedule
established by City Council Resolution No. 84 -199
N.C.S. ,
or make
alternative arrangements to meet the low and moderate
income
housing
provision
requirements of the Housing Element subject to
approval
of the
City and
.prior to approval of the Final Map..
3. The developer shall provide full front, yard and street side yard .(on
corner lots') landscaping to all conventional single - family lots and to the
street frontage of 'all quadraplots; this shall include finish grading, lawn or
ground: cover and trees and shrubs. 'In addition,; the .number of street trees
shall be doubled, and a planting scheme developed to give the effect of
natural grouping.. A master landscape plan shall be prepared for the
project detailing street tree, quadraplot and individual - lot planting schemes
and species and shall be subject to the approval of SPARC.
4. The Unit Development Plan. shall clearly note the location and design of
the rear and side yard six- foot,. solid wood, view - obscuring fence of each
unit.
5. The developer shall create a landscaped center island_ on Ranier Avenue
at its intersection with Ely Boulevard at the. entrance to the Park Place
Development subject to the approval of SPARC and appropriate City
departments. Said island shall be designed. and constructed to City
standards and include a City approved irrigation system.
6. The developer may shift or substitute up to twenty percent of the
approved unit types in Unit IV without having, to apply for a revision to
the approved PUD Unit Development Plan, subject. to approval of the
Community Development and Planning Department.
7. Any signs erected to advertise or direct ,persons to Park Place. Unit IV
shall meet the requirements of the City sign ordinance and obtain a sign
permit from the City.
7
163
8. The design and materials of the masonry sound wall and the landscaping
along the Ely Boulevard frontage of the Park Place Unit IV shall be
coordinated with the materials used and the design of the masonry sound
wall and landscaping of either the Morningstar or Village Meadows projects,
subject to the approval of SPARC.
9. A legally binding maintenance contract shall be executed by the
owners [developers of the project with the City to insure maintenance of
landscaping and irrigation improvements of Parcels "A", "B" and "C" as
shown on the Tentative Map and the center island on Ranier Avenue for a
break -in period of three years or until the project is completely developed,
whichever is longer. Said agreement shall be accomplished prior to
approval of the Final Map.
10. Revised sepia prints of the final approved unit development plan,
U tentative map and landscape plan reflecting all conditions of approval shall
be submitted to the Community Development and Planning Department within
thirty days after Council approval of the revised development plan.
11. Unit architecture, exterior materials and. colors., overall model
distribution and the relationship between adjoining units of Park Place IV
and Morningstar (i.e. views, rear . yard privacy) shall be subject to the
approval of SPARC.
12. The developer shall provide sites and necessary improvements for
public transit bus pull -out areas subject to the standards and .approval of
the City; Transit Coordinator and Golden Gate Transit.
A motion was made by Commissioner S'erpilio and seconded by Commissioner
Perry to recommend to the City Council approval of the proposed Tentative
Map based on the findings and subject to the conditions as stated in the
letter from the City Engineer and as listed in the staff report and as
discussed.
AYES: 6 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 1
Findings
1. The proposed subdivision, together with provisions 'for its design and
improvement, is consistent with the General Plan.
2. The proposed subdivision is compatible with the objectives, policies,
general 'land uses, and programs. specified in said General Plan.
3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed.
4. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development.
5. The; .design of the Subdivision and the proposed improvements therefore
will not cause substantial environmental damage, and no substantial or
avoidable, injury will occur to fish or wildlife or their habitat.
0
164
6. . The design of the Subdivision and the .type of improvements will not
cause serious public health problems.
7. The design of the Subdivision and the type of improvements proposed
will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access
through or use of property within the proposed subdivision.
8. The discharge of waste from the proposed subdivision in -to the existing
community sewer :system will not result in violation of the existing
requirements prescribed by the Regional Water Quality Control Board.
Conditions
1. Lot 3 of Unit •1,, Lots 13 and 14 of Unit 2 and Lot 12 will be reconfigured
to. improve driveway 'access to Lot 3 Unit 1.
V. CAULFIELD ACCESSORY DWELLINGS, Thomas Caulfield, Corner of S.
McDowell Avenue and Lindberg Lane, AP' No.'s 7- 492 -11, Fife 1.439, 1.440,
1.441.
1. Consideration of Use Permit for Accessory Dwelling with existing
primary residence at 604 S. McDowell.
2. Consideration of Use Permit for Accessory Dwelling with not yet built
primary residence at 600 S. McDowell.
3. Consideration of Use Permit for Accessory Dwelling with not yet built
primary residence at 608 S. McDowell.
The Public Hearing was opened.
Speakers: Joe Krause 1337 Marian Way (INFORM OF SPARC AGENDA
DATE)
Thomas Caulfield - 116 Banff Way
The Public Hearing was closed.
A motion was, made by Commissioner Head and seconded by Commissioner
Perry to .approve the Use Permits for Accessory Dwellings subject to the
conditions listed in the staff report as amended.
AYES: 5
NOES: 1 (Sobel)
ABSENT': 1. (Libar.le)
Conditions:
1
I
3. Subject to all conditions of Engineering Letter dated 10,118/84 re • Park
Place IV
165
1. Any two story design shall be subject to SPARC review..
z l l l MOW / bf / f &k/ lalrldHUbdit Al' Wi& 1IAh9bkIdd11, ldiWfiddildd / bf / t>hhl htirit j
Oa Mi! IN hc/444 /ilW kdfle�rAbf / MAU /tai idilthlbAN l HildVdd I / itbh iii /id 14OPkbkU
6t and 1I 1dwIfI Al /d id/ iCliilkfrkd / / SC,E Wdqt khI.
3. All additions or remodeling to the existing Caulfield house shall
complement and enhance its. architecture. Any such addition shall be in the
same shingle siding and architectural style as the old house and be subject
to SPARC review.
4. The' proposed .accessory dwelling to the old Caulfield house shall be a
Y b k,bidll l /Mf b/ l lddthIL&k " architecturally . l l kl / /dibBMkLi -/ l /ddOl l / >ddiAdiii&/ / hb
00 l6bQid. The design shall also match the primary dwelling in shingle
siding, 'window treatments, door types, and trim detailing, subject to the
U approval of SPARC.
CO 5. The, proposed new houses should iYdd llhkl ldfl - 1 dldW iYel l i*t iti+dv l i:hiI be
compatible with the existing Caulfield house in style.
6. The. design and exterior materials of the accessory dwellings to the
proposed new houses must harmonize with their respective principal dwelling
designs 'in terms of roof lines, siding, window types, trim details, and color
schemes;.
7. The proposed principal dwellings must be built before or simultaneously
with their proposed accessory dwellings.
8. Portions of the existing fencing between the existing lot and neighbors
shall bet replaced with 6' solid wood fence. Similar fencing shall be
installed between the proposed lots and between the private yard area of
the accessory units and that of their respective primary dwelling unit
yards, subject to SPARC approval.
911 /M /MOchyWddikddilYidddllafl66*b4/hhkdY1W 116HW*h&.
10. All trees over 4 in trunk diameter or 20' high shall be located on the
site plan and any improvements resulting in the loss of such existing trees
and screen vegetation shall be, subject to Community Development and
Planning approval.
11. The driveway cuts of Lots 1 and 2 shall be narrowed to a width of 12'
at property line.
12. The existing hedge on South McDowell Boulevard shall be retained as
much as possible, but shall be trimmed to achieve necessary sight distance
lines for safety from the new driveways, subject to staff approval.
13. The proposed parcel map for the subject property shall be approved
prior to :the proposed construction.
ADJOURNMENT: 11 :50 PM.
10
F. do
ATTEST:
Warren' 'Salmons
Director,
Community Development and Planning
11