Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 11/13/198416'7 Not Official Until Approved By The Planning Commission MINUTES Petaluma Planning Commission November 13, 1984 Regular, Meeting 7:30 p.m. City Council Chambers Petaluma, California PRESENT: Commissioners Head, Hilligoss, Read, Serpilio *, Sobel, Libarle ABSENT: Commissioner Perry STAFF: Warren Salmons, Community Development and Planning Director U Mike Moore, Associate Planner Kurt Yeiter, Associate Planner APPROVAL OF MINUTES Minutes from the meeting of October 23, 1984 were approved as corrected. (page 2, Condition 6 should be 10 days instead of 1 day) . (page 10, item 4, strike "special little cottage". ) * Commissioner Serpilio arrived - 7 :40 Ph4. CORRESPONDENCE None DIRECTOR'S REPOR Warren Salmons announced the promotion of Mike Moore 'from Associate Planner to Principal Planner. He also announced the hiring jof a new Principal Planner, Pamela Tuft. Mr. Salmons described an upcoming Planning Seminar at Sonoma State University in Rohnert Park and asked the Commissioners if they would be attending. Mr. Salmons will make the arrangements and contact each Commissioner prior to the Seminar. COMMISSIONERS' REPORT None NOTE: Strike -Out Type (///) = Deletion Underline Type = Addition GENERAL PLAN HEARINGS: I. PROPOSED RELOCATION OF URBAN SEPARATOR, PROPOSED INCLUSION OF ADDITIONAL PLANNED RESIDENTIAL AREA IN CITY GENERAL PLAN, EAST OF ELY BOULEVARD SOUTH (FUTURE EXTENSION) AND SOUTH OF FRATES ROAD, DUFFEL FINANCIAL CORPORATION, (3.301, 8.91, 11.746). Continuation from October 23, 1984 meeting. 1 r• 1. Proposed General Plan /Environmental Design Plan Amendment to modify location of urban separator to add approximately 46 acres of residential designation. The public hearing was opened. SPEAKERS: Mr. Van Logan - Duffel Company Representative. The public hearing was closed. A motion was made by Commissioner Libarle and seconded by Commissioner Read, to recommend to the City Council approval of the General Plan/ Environmental Design Plan Amendment as noted in the staff report (Exhibit No. 1) and amended. A. AP 17- 050 -06 and 17- 140 -08, Golf Course main portion from Agriculture and Open Space to Urban Separator. B. AP 17- 050 -0.4 and 05 from Planned Residential, (7 dwellings /acre), Urban Separator and Agriculture and Open Space to Urban Low Density Residential (`5 dwellings /acre) below the 60 foot contour, Development Constraint Area (DCA) (1 dwelling /acre) above the 60 foot contour with provision for .automatic conversion to Urban Low Density Residential (5 dwellings] acre) at such time as the availability of domestic and fire flow water service is confirmed to the satisfaction of City staff, and Urban Separator -- 200 -300 feet in width paralleling and adjacent to the project side of Frates Road. C. AP 17- 150 -11 ( "Portion) from Planned Residential (7 dwellings/ acre), Urban Separator, and Agricultural Open Space to Planned Residential (7 dwellings /acre) and Urban Separator -- 200 -300 feet in width paralleling and, adjacent to the project side of Ely Road and the PG &E easement, separator width to include said easement. D. AP 17- 030 -17 from Planned Residential. to Study AYES: 4 NOES: 1 (Head) ABSENT: 1 (Perry) ABSTAIN: 1 (Serpilio) 2. Consideration of prezoning of area to be annexed, corresponding. to General Plan designations. The public hearing was opened. SPEAKERS:: None. The public hearing was closed. A motion was made, by Commissioner Read and seconded by Commissioner Sobel' to recommend to the City Council approval of prezoning as refrenced in the staff report Exhibit 3 as amended: 169 A. AP 17- 050 -04 and 17- 050 -05: R1 -40, 000 (one dwelling unit per 40,000 square feet of land .area) for area above the 60 foot contour line and R1=8,000 for the area below the 60 foot contour line. B. AP 17- 150 -11 (Portion) : R1-6,500 for area which conforms to Planned Redidential Designation on GP /EDP and "A" Agricultural for area which conforms to urban separator designation on GP /EDP. 4. The project and subsequent development is subject to the mitigation measures outlined in the project EIR. AYES: 5 NOES: 0 ABSTAIN: 1 (Serpilio) ABSENT: 1 (Perry) A motion was made by Commissioner Head and seconded by Commissioner Sobel to recommend to the City Council the following General Plan/ Environmental Design Plan Policies: 1. Where urban density designations are applied to or proposed for a parcel(s) lying only partially within proven water service zone limits, they DCA Development Constraint Area designation shall be applied to they portion of the parcel(s) lying outside the proven water service zone limit. 2. A storm water bypass system shall be planned in order to relieve citywide flooding potential by diverting runoff from creeks draining the Sonoma Mountain Area to the Petaluma River at a point downstream from the: developed areas of the City. Each and every project in the future path of said system shall provide for said system in. its design subject to approval of the Sonoma County Water Agency and City staff. AYES: 6 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 1 (Perry) II. PROPOSED REVISIONS TO ORIGINAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, ALAN ROSENBERG, 1302 HOLM ROAD (3.309). 1. (Cont.) Consideration of amendment to adopted PUD development plan for' an industrial condominium conversion. 3 C. AP 17- 030 -17: "S" Study Findings: 00 1. The proposed prezoning is consistent with the applicable provisions of Iq the General Plan /EDP and Zoning Ordinance. V co 2. Prezoning will insure that the future annexation of the subject property represents an orderly and logical expansion of the City Limits. Q 3. The project will not be detrimental to the health, safety or public welfare of the community or surrounding property owners. 4. The project and subsequent development is subject to the mitigation measures outlined in the project EIR. AYES: 5 NOES: 0 ABSTAIN: 1 (Serpilio) ABSENT: 1 (Perry) A motion was made by Commissioner Head and seconded by Commissioner Sobel to recommend to the City Council the following General Plan/ Environmental Design Plan Policies: 1. Where urban density designations are applied to or proposed for a parcel(s) lying only partially within proven water service zone limits, they DCA Development Constraint Area designation shall be applied to they portion of the parcel(s) lying outside the proven water service zone limit. 2. A storm water bypass system shall be planned in order to relieve citywide flooding potential by diverting runoff from creeks draining the Sonoma Mountain Area to the Petaluma River at a point downstream from the: developed areas of the City. Each and every project in the future path of said system shall provide for said system in. its design subject to approval of the Sonoma County Water Agency and City staff. AYES: 6 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 1 (Perry) II. PROPOSED REVISIONS TO ORIGINAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, ALAN ROSENBERG, 1302 HOLM ROAD (3.309). 1. (Cont.) Consideration of amendment to adopted PUD development plan for' an industrial condominium conversion. 3 I trill SPEAKERS: Sidney Lewin - Landscape Architect A motion was made - by Commissioner Head and seconded by Commissioner Serpilio to continue action on this item to the Planning Commission meeting of December 11, 1984. AYES: 6 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 1 (Perry) III. 3 -M BILLBOARD, - 3 -M NATIONAL ADVERTISING COMPANY, 500' SOUTHEAST OF 101 FREEWAY ON NORTHWESTERN PACIFIC RIGHT -OF -WAY NEAR LAKEVILLE HIGHWAY.• (1.437) . 1. Consideration, of E.I.Q. 2. Consideration for Use Permit for a billboard -type sign. A motion was made by Commissioner Head and seconded by Commissioner Sobel to continue action on this item to the Planning Commission meeting of January 8, 1985. AYES: 6 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 1 (Perry) IV. REDWOOD BUSINESS PARK, G &W MCDOWELL AND ASSOCIATES, LOTS 1 & 3, REDWOOD BUSINESS PARK. (.3.328, 8.94, 11.842) . 1. Consideration of E.I.Q. 2. Consideration of General Plan/EDP Amendment. 3. Consideration of Rezoning. The public hearing was opened. SPEAKERS: None The public hearing was closed. A motion was made by Commissioner Head and seconded by Commissioner Sobel to recommend to the City' Council adoption of a negative declaration for this project. AYES: 6 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 1 (Perry) A motion was made by Commissioner Head and seconded by Commissioner Libarle to recommend to the 'City Council approval of the General Plan /EDP land use map amendment as follows: Change Redwood Business Park Subdivision Map (No. 6 -176.) Lot 1 to Service Commercial and Lot 3 to Industrial) . AYES: 6 NOES 0 ABSENT: 1 (Perry) 4 171 A motion was made by Commissioner Head and seconded by Commissioner Serpilio to recommend to the City Council approval of the zoning map change of Redwood Business Park Subdivision Map (No. 6 -176) Lot 1 to C- H /FP -C zone and Lot 3 to M- L /FP -C zone based on the following finding: "The proposed amendment conforms to the Petaluma General Plan and Environmental Design Plan and consistent with the public necessity, convenience, .general welfare, and purposes of the Highway Commercial and Light Industrial zoning ordinances." AYES: ' 6 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 1 (Perry) 0 00 V. P014EROY PREZONING, C.P. POMEROY, INC.; 85± ACRES, VICINITY OF HOPPER STREET, HIGHWAY 101, AND THE PETALUMA RIVER (� (3.322, 11.828). 1. Consideration of E.I.Q. 2. Consideration of Prezoning of area to be annexed, corresponding to General Plan designation. The public hearing was opened. SPEAKERS: Jack Macy, C.E. - Mitchell and Hery,ford The public .hearing, was closed. A motion was made by Commissioner Head and seconded by Commissioner Libarle to recommend to the City Council approval of a negative declaration based on the findings of the staff report. 1. The project is consistent with all applicable General Plan /EDP policies and land use designations, and the zoning is compatible with the general plan. 2. No significant environmental impacts have been identified with the project. 3. Potential environmental impacts of future development. of the site will be mitigated by conditions applied through the various City development procedures. A motion was made by Commissioner Sobel and seconded by Commissioner Head to- recommend to the City Council the Prezoning. of AP 136- 010 -21 to MG General Industrial be approved subject to the three findings in the staff report as follows: 1. The. proposed prezonings to M -G and AG are consistent with the applicable provisions of the General Plan /EDP and Zoning Ordinance. Z. Prezoning will insure that the future annexation of the subject property represents an orderly and logical expansion of the City Limits. 01 172 3. The project will not be detrimental to the health., safety or public welfare of the community or surrounding property owners. AYES: 6 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 1 (Perry) VI. SPRING MEADOWS IV, MCBAIL COMPANY, VICINITY OF GARFIELD DRIVE AND PROPOSED EXTENSION OF CAULFIELD LANE (6.615) . 1. Consideration of Tentative Map for 49 lot residential subdivision. The public hearing was opened. SPEAKERS: None. The public hearing was closed. A motion was made by Commissioner, Head and seconded by Commissioner Read to recommend to the City -Council that the tentative map for Spring Meadows' Unit IV be approved subject to the findings and conditions of the staff report and the Engineers letter. Findings 1. The proposed subdivision, together with provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan. 2. The proposed subdivision is compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses, and programs speci =fied in said General Plan. 3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. 4. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. 5. The design of the Subdivision and the proposed improvements therefore will not cause substantial environmental damage, and ` no' substantial or avoidable injury will occur to fish or wildlife or their habitat. 6. The design of the Subdivision and the type of improvements will not cause -serious public health problems. 7. The design of the Subdivision and the type of improvements proposed will not conflict with easements:, acquired by the. public at. large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. 8. The discharge of waste from the proposed subdivision into the existing community sewer system will not result in. violation of the existing requirements prescribed by he Regional Water Quality Control Board. Conditions 1. The, project sponsor shall be required to pay low and moderate income housing in -lieu fees of an amount; to be determined according to the schedule established by City Council' Resolution No. 84 -199 N.C.S., or I 173 • 24 ATTEST: Jmwcau Warren Salmons Director, Community Development and Planning make alternative arrangements to meet the low and moderate income housing provision requirements of the Housing Element subject to approval of the City and prior to approval of the Final Map. 2. The developer shall comply with all conditions of the City Engineer as set forth in the attached letter. AYES: 6 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 1 (Perry) VII. PACCIORINI, T.E. MCNAMARA AND ASSOCIATES, 101 PACCIORINI DRIVE. (3.321, 8.93, 11.818) . 1. Consideration of E.I.Q. 2. Consideration of GP /EDP Amendment. 3. Consideration of Rezoning. The public hearing was opened. SPEAKERS: Steve Hernandez - 804 6th Street Mr. Pacciorini Maury Burgante - 207 Ridgeview Drive Jim McNamara - .Civil Engineer for Applicant Sharon Mansfield - '219 Ridgeview Drive The public hearing was closed. A motion was made by Commissioner Head and seconded by Commissioner Libarle to suggest that applicant withdraw GP /EDP Amendment and return to the Commission with a PUD plan for a nine lot development as depicted on the preliminary tentative map. AYES: 6 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 1 (Perry) VIII. PROPOSED REZONING OF ASSES'SOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 008 - 151 -4:, 13 and 14, LOCATED ON HINMAN STREET AND FAIR STREET., FROM PLANNED UNIT DISTRICT (.PUD) TO SINGLE- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R -1 -6500) . Continued from October 9, 1984. Staff recommends additional continuance as requested by applicant. A motion was made by Commissioner Serpilio and seconded by Commissioner Head to continue action on this item to the Meeting of January 8, 1985. AYES: 6 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 1 (Perry) ADJOURNMENT: 10:10 PM. 1 7