Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 04/23/1985263 Not Official Until Approved By The Planning Commission MINUTES CORRESPONDENCE None. DIRECTOR'S REPORT: Warren Salmons advised that the joint Council Commission meeting regarding the General Plan update went well and that a summary will be distributed. He also advised that Council had reviewed the Bed and Breakfast and Adult Entertainment Ordinances prepared by staff. Both Ordinances have been .returned to staff with comments. COMMISSIONERS' REPORT Commissioner. Read - asked permission to discuss an item of interest at the end of the meeting. Commissioner Sobel circulated a letter from the Chamber of Commerce to the City Manager regarding the City entrance sign meeting. NOTE: Strike -Out Type ( - - - -) = Deletion Underline Type ( ) = Addition PUBLIC HEARINGS I. DELMAR AND LYNN FRIEDRICHSON, 530 MADISON, AP No. 7- 081 -29, File 1.464. 's 1. Consideration of use permit for an accessory dwelling. The public hearing was opened. SPEAKERS: None 1 Petaluma Planning Commission April 23, 1985 Regular Meeting 7:30 p.m. City' Council Chambers Petaluma, California a. PRESENT: Commissioners Head, Hilligoss, Libarle, Read, Serpilio, Sobel, Tencer ABSENT: None U STAFF;: Warren Salmons, Planning Director Pamela Tuft, Principal Planner APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Minutes of the April 9 meeting were approved with t °e following change: Page 1, Correspondence, sentence corrected to read; "Commissioner Hilligoss advised that she had received a Chamber of. Commerce Resolution that would pertain to a later meeting". CORRESPONDENCE None. DIRECTOR'S REPORT: Warren Salmons advised that the joint Council Commission meeting regarding the General Plan update went well and that a summary will be distributed. He also advised that Council had reviewed the Bed and Breakfast and Adult Entertainment Ordinances prepared by staff. Both Ordinances have been .returned to staff with comments. COMMISSIONERS' REPORT Commissioner. Read - asked permission to discuss an item of interest at the end of the meeting. Commissioner Sobel circulated a letter from the Chamber of Commerce to the City Manager regarding the City entrance sign meeting. NOTE: Strike -Out Type ( - - - -) = Deletion Underline Type ( ) = Addition PUBLIC HEARINGS I. DELMAR AND LYNN FRIEDRICHSON, 530 MADISON, AP No. 7- 081 -29, File 1.464. 's 1. Consideration of use permit for an accessory dwelling. The public hearing was opened. SPEAKERS: None 1 264 The public hearing was closed. A motion was made by Commissioner Head and seconded" by Commissioner Read to recommend approval of the use permit per the findings and' conditions in the staff report as amended. AYES: 7 NOES: 0 Findings L The proposed use, subject to the following conditions, will conform to the intent - of the zoning ordinance and policies of the General Plan / EDP. 2. The proposed use, subject to the following condition's, will • not constitute a nuisance or be detrimental to the public welfare of the community. Conditions a-. - At. least one paved off - street parking space (minimum 9 '. X, 20 shall be provided adjacent to the proposed accessory dwelling either - using the existing curb cut or, if a new curb cut is required, 'the existing curb cut shall be repaired. The space may not be in the required 10' setback. i 2. Because the site is in the Flood Plain Combining District, applicants. shall present certification that floor height is a' minimum of 1 foot above. the 100 -year flood height prior to issuance' of a building permit. 3. Fencing along the inside property lines of the parcel adjacent to the accessory dwelling shall be refurbished or replaced to provide a solid six foot high privacy screen. This shall extend at least:'from the ten foot setback line on the southwest property line to the south corner of the lot and thence northeast at least 100 feet. (note: .fencing in setback area is optional, but must not be over 42'" tall) . 4.., , The proposed accessory dwelling shall be repositioned at least five feet closer to Madison Street to increase the size of the private rear yard open space of. the accessory dwelling. This yard shall be fenced with a six foot high solid fence from the rear yard of the main dwelling on the lot. Fence placement and design subject to staff approval. 5... Sidewalks must be installed along the entire street occupancy of primary dwe ling now under constructi permit is required for this work. 6. Lot drainage must be toward the street and be al Building Inspector prior to issuance of uil ; ing permit. ontage before Excavation by 'the E 265 II,. HARRY SCOLES, 604 WEST STREET, AP No. 6- 071 -52, File 1.461. 1. Consideration of use permit for an accessory dwelling. The public hearing was opened. SPEAKERS: Harry Scoles - 604 West Street - applicant. The public hearing was closed. A motion was made by Commissioner Head and seconded by Commissioner Libarle to approve the use permit per the findings and conditions in the 00 staff report. Iq AYES: 7 NOES: 0 U Findings 1. The proposed use, subject to the following conditions, will conform lo the intent of the zoning ordinance. and policies of the General Plan /EDP. 2. The proposed use, subject to the following conditions, will not constitute a nuisance. or be detrimental to the public welfare of the community. Conditions 1. The proposed accessory dwelling .space will- be :subject to inspection by the Building Inspector and shall be modified to meet the requirements of the Uniform Building Code as required. 2. The existing offstreet parking area of the site shall be. kept clear to permit parking of . three vehicles and . shall be so striped. III. BIG "O" TIRES, 516 - EAST' WASHINGTON STREET, AP No. 7- 061 -40 and 41, File 1.462. 1. Consideration of EIQ . 2. Consideration of Use Permit. The public hearing was opened. SPEAKERS: Mr. Marrero - 2625 San Pablo Ave. , Berkeley, CA. 94702 - Applicant representative. The public hearing was closed. A motion was made by Commissioner Head and seconded by Commissioner Libarle to recommend approval of a mitigated negative declaration per the findings in the staff report. AYES: 7 NOES: 0 3 266 Findings 1. The project as conditionally approved does not have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment. Given the particular location of the site, impacts to animal,. plant,, archaeological value or long -term environmental goals are riot applicable.' 2. The project and its environmental impacts, as' conditionally 'approved, will not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings and that mitigation measures are incorporated herein to reduce identified impacts to an acceptable level, prior to commencement of use. A :motion was made by Commissioner Head and seconded by Commissioner Libarle to. recommend approval of the use permit per the amended findings and. conditions listed in the staff report.: Findings 1. The proposed use, subject to the following' conditions,_ will conform to - the intent of the . zoning ordinance and policies of the General Plan/EDP. 2. The proposed use, subject to the following conditions, will not constitute a nuisance or be detrimental to the public welfare of the community. , Conditions 1. A noise study has been prepared addressing specific anticipated noise volumes. Mitigation measures shall be constructed as 'recommended in the sound analysis report, as follows: a. The compressor s1�a1P hoc- dtethrit}iirr t}re- trm�teire -�trd shall be protected by an enclosure built to standards as set forth on pages 6 & ? of the attached report 1192 (Sound Noise Study) . � b. Utilization of power equipment for lug nut . removal /installation shall be limited to the electric 'lug wrenches, or "impact guns". C. The two bays closest to E. Washington Street shall be the only bays used for tire removal and installation to minimize the 1 repetitive use of the "impact" guns. d. Engine racing.and horn honking shall be prohibited. e. A new fence shall be placed along the south property line, subject to staff review and approval, and shall be built to standards set forth on page 6 of the - sound report #1192, as prepared by Sound Solutions dated April 1, 1985 (copy attached) . 2. Lighting shall be shown on the plans,.. subject to staff approval, and shall be so directed and shielded as to minimize glare ' to adjacent residential uses. 4 267 3 The proposed project, site plan, building elevations, landscaping and sign program shall be subject to SPARC approval in accordance with Section 26 -400 of the Zoning Ordinance. All conditions of design approval shall become conditions of the Use Permit. 4. The parking space at the south end of the parking aisle shall be eliminated to allow provision of spaces with the 9' standard width and extension of the landscaping strip along the south property line. 5. No outdoor storage of materials or equipment, other than vehicles being worked on, with those * vehicles remaining no longer than three days. 00 6. Operating hours to be limited to 7:30 AM to 5 -38 6:00 PM, Monday I through Saturdays. U 7. All drainage., systems are subject. to approval .�by the :City Engineer. and Envirotech to insure that no inordinate or unacceptable. amount of solvents, grease-,. grit, concrete', . `or other .materials enter .the waste water treatment facilities and to insure adequate separation - of storm drainage from sanitary sewer systems. 8. The single driveway shall be chained at time of closing. 9. No outdoor display of materials offered for sale shall be allowed. 10. All roof or ground mounted equipment shall be fully architecturally screened subject to review and approval of SPARC. 11. All proposed construction shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire Marshal and the Building Official and shall comply with all applicable codes, standards and regulations. 12. Expansion or introduction of additional. services .beyond those stated herein shall require' application for a Use Permit revision. 13. Trash pick -up shall occur no earlier than 6:30- AM-and no later than 8:00 PM. 14. Street frontage improvements shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer and shall comply with City standards.. 15. Single driveway shall be signed "RIGHT TURN ONLY" for exiting traffic. IV. CITY OF PETALUMA, POLICE FACILITY, 969 PETALUMA BLVD. NORTH, AP No. 6- 450 -17, File 1.467. 1.. Consideration of EIQ. 2. Consideration of Use Permit The public hearing was opened. 5 268 SPEAKERS: Shawn Miles -'concerns regarding police cars 'turning out onto Petaluma Blvd. from parking lot area. ' John Scharer - City Manager - Explained that the 'City has looked at other (attached) parcels for future expansion. Commissioner Tencer Wishes SPARC to pay particular attention to existing and future landscaping at this site. The public hearing was closed. A motion was made' by Commissioner Head and seconded by Commissioner Sobel to recommend approval of the use permit per the findings in the staff report. AYES: 7 NOES: 0 Findings 1. The project as conditionally approved does not have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment. Given the particular location of the site, impacts to animal, "plant, archaeological - value or long -term environmental goals are not applicable. 2. The project and its environmental impacts, as conditionally approved, will not cause substantial adverse effects on_ beings and that mitigation measures are incorporated herein to reduce identified impacts to an acceptable level, prior to commencement, of use. A motion was made by Commissioner Head and seconded by Commissioner Sobel to recommend approval of the use permit per the findings and conditions listed in the staff report. AYES: 7 NOES: 0 Findings 1. The proposed land acquisition and use, subject to the following'"° - ` conditions, will .conform to the intent of - the zoning ordinance and policies of the General Plan /EDP. 2. The proposed use., subject' to the following conditions., will not constitute a nuisance or be detrimental to ,the public welfare of the community. f z CONDITIONS 1. All remodeling and /or additions to the existing structure shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire Marshal and the Building Official and shall comply with all applicable codes, standards and regulations. 2. The proposed project, site improvements and building elevation remodeling and 'landscaping shall be subject to SPARC approval in . accordance with Section 26 -400. of the Zoning Ordinance. All conditions of design approval shall become conditions of the use Permit. 6 ON • i 1 f 3. Modifications to existing lighting shall conform to Section 22 -304 of the Petaluma Zoning Ordinance and shall be so directed and shielded as to minimize glare to adjacent residential uses. V. DISCUSSION: TEMPORARY USES /ZONING PERMITS (Continued from meeting of 4/11/85).. General discussion regarding temporary zoning permits; it was recommended that the, Zoning Ordinance pertain to private property and that the Municipal Code ,pertain to public property. A consensus of the Commission directed staff to bring the item before the Commission for public hearing. This Discussion Item was added by Commissioner Read: VI. DISCUSSION: LEGISLATIVE SESSION - UPDATE ON SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND OTHER PLANNING RELATED LEGISLATION. The Commissioners held a brief discussion regarding the upcoming administrative briefings in Sacramento. A consensus of the Commission recommended. attendance by interested members. ADJOURNMENT: 9:02 PM. i� 7