Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 10/08/1985J ` 63 c Not Official Until Approved By' The Planning Commission MINUTES Petaluma Planning Commission October 8, 1985 Regular Meeting 7:30 p.m. City Council Chambers Petaluma, California i PRESENT: Commissioners Hilligoss, Libarle, Read, Serpilio,, Sobel, Woolsey. k ABSENT: Commissioner Head' { i STAFF: Warren ' Salmons, Planning, Director Pamela Tuft, Principal Planner APPROVAL OF MINUTES Minutes of September 24, 1985 were approved as presented. f CORR None. _ _ = Deletion = Addition I. GOLDEN, GATE TRANSIT, - PROPOSED ROUTE AND BUS STOP MODIFICATION'S,. ROUTE 7&, CAULFIELD - 'ST. FRANCIS - BAYWOOD1 DRIVE, (File 9.7072)'. 'S REPORT Director Salmons :advised the Commission that he be attending the 22 October Planning Commission meeting. )NEARS' REPORT.: Commissioner's Hilligoss and Read attended of Cali ornia Cities meeting in San Francisco. i NOTE; . Strike -Out Type ( - - -_) I Underline Type ( ) a f CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARIN`G'S i L. Consideration of EIQ., 2. Consideration of proposed changes to northbound bus route and' one (:1) bus stop on Golden Gate Transit Route #76 ('evening route) . The public hearing was continued. SPEAKERS: Ed Jacobson - 842 St. Francis Dr. - concerns re: buses on St.' Francis,, narrowness of street. Cliff Gilmore - 1256 Ponderosa - spoke against routel change. Carol Compania - 924 St. Francis Dr. - concerns re: bus traffic on St. Francis,,, bus stop- on Aspen, traffic hazards. Gerald Kunio w916St - Francis : Dr Concerns re :: , s oke - streets if buses run over St. Francis, concerns with safety r of children.... Charlie Johnson - 1253 Lombardi - concerns re: noise, traffic 1 J364- ; problems . Alan Zahradnik - Golden Gate Transit representative GGT wants-.- to -serve .Park ° and -- 7Ride= -lot _.discusses ­the -:bus stops answered questions from Commission. Chris Rohrs - 477 Albert Way Pet. Commute Club - believes there might be problems with route on St. Francis. Jan Kuey - 916 St. Francis - concerns. re: children safety on St. ' Francis. "The public - hearing was closed. A motion was made by Commissioner Hilligoss and seconded by Commissioner Sobel to recommend to the City Council the denial of the proposed amendment to use St. Francis, based on the findings as amended. The Planning Commission further recommended continued - use of Baywood or ;Caulfield as an alternate. AYES: 4 NOES: 2 ABSENT: 1. (Head) Findings 1. 'The ,proposed route and bus stop changes will not conform, to the :intent of the applicable goals and policies of the General Plan /EDP, 2. The proposed changes will constitute a nuisance or be detrimental to the public welfare of the community. II. DAON CORPORATION, SON'OMA HIGHLANDS MAJOR SOBDIVISION, AP -No's 8 -32 -42 8 -49 -9 & 10; 8'-48 -5; 19 -12 -15 .& 16; (file 6.548). 1. 'Consideration of request for a stay on tentative map expiration period, to exclude -period litigation activity. The public was allowed to ,speak. Cynthia Bowman - 625 B Street Speaks in favor of denial of stay request sitin,g traffic conditions, GP update, feels a new EIR should be .done. Tom Jones - Applicant's representative - stated that a supplemental ;EIR is being done by DAON Corp.. 'Dennis Milliken - 501 Western - representing Petaluma Area Citizens League - opposes tentative map stay. A consensus was reached to ask staff to further review this request` with Joe For the City Attorney and to return with more information on October 22. 2 r ��S PUBLIC HEARING III. LAKEVILLE INVVESTORS, YARDBIRD PLAZA NORTH -WEST CORNER 'OF' LAKEVILLE HIGHWAY AND PETROLEUM AVENUE, AP No. 05- 050 -22, (,File 1.,474) r , 1 Consideration of EIQ... 2. Consideration of use permit to allow 48,600 sq.ft. retail / commercial center to include 2,,,80:0 sq.ft. fast -food restaurant, 9,300 sq.ft. lease space (includes 2, 75,0 sq,..ft. , convenience market) and 36,000 sq.. ft.. hardware store in C -H Zone. Commissioner Hilligoss ekcused herself from action on this project because of 'coriflict -of- interest.. The public hearing was opened..: SPEAKERS: -Jerold Tierney Project architect - described the project. and explained the proposed acceleration /deceleration Pane. Steven 'Cavallini - applicant., Bradley Yust - Applicant, 3333 Lakeville Highway exprmined design, spoke for approval of fast food restaurant, against the sound barrier wall.- r The public hearing, was closed. , A motion was made by Commissioner Serp lio, and ,"seconded by :Commissioner I barle to have prepared a negatives .declaration for the shopping; center and. convenience market,, (excluding:. the fast -food restaurant) - based on the. findinlgs as ,listed in the staff report.. AYES' 5 ABSENT: 1 (Head) _Head) ABSTAIN: 1 (,Hingos&)`: - r . Findings t- 1. The project as conditionally 'approved does not have the potential to- substantially degrade the quality of the environment,. substantially reduce ;the habitat of fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self' - sustaining levels:,. threaten or eliminate a plane or animal community, reduce the , number- or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant- ors animial., or eliminate important examples t of the major periods of California hi sto ry o prehistory.. 2. The, project as conditionally .approved. does: not have the potential 'to achieve, short -term environmental- goals' to the. disadvantage, of long -term environmental goals,._ 1. The project, as conditionally approved„ does not have possible environmental effects which are individually, limited. but cumulatively considerable:, 4; The environmental effects of this project, as conditionally approved, will not cause substantial adverse effects; on human beings, either directly, or indirectly.. 1 z ; 5. A traffic analysis report has been prepared which recommends, s gnalization of the Lakeville Highway , and _ Petroleum _.,Avenue = ;intersection_ - in'.- order _ to =:mitigate= FAra'ffic•-_' impacts ;_from. - ..the °- proposed project. 6. Traffic 'impacts will be mitigated by the incorporation of street widening . improvements to 'Lakeville Highway and Petroleum Avenue . pursuant to the Lakeville Plan Line Study and requirements: �of the City `Engineer . 7. Traffic related noise impacts from the signalization and, additional traffic generated by this project will be mitigated by the construction of a_ sound barrier in .the area of the . Lakeville Highway and Petroleum Avenue 'intersection. A motion was made by Commissioner Libarle and seconded by Commissioner Ser.pilo to grant a use permit to allow construction of a 45,800 square 'foot shopping center including a 2,750 square foot convenience market and to deny the ,granting ; of a use permit to allow construction of a, fast --food restaurant based on the findings :and subject to- the conditions listed in the. staff report as :amended. ,AYES; 5 ABSENT: 1 (Head) ABSTAIN: 1 (Hilligoss) , Findings : 1. The proposed. use, subject to the following conditions, w ill con_ form to the intent of the zoning ordinance and policies of the General ,Plan / EDP.. 2. The proposed use, subject to the following conditions:, will not constitute a nuisance or be detrimental to the public welfare of the 'community. Conditions 1.. All .signalization, improvements shall 'be done in conjunction with the development of the project :site as approved, subject to review and approval- by the City Engineer and CALTRANS. Z. All Lakeville Highway street frontage improvements shall be constructed in .conformance with the adopted Lakeville Plan Line Study with offer of dedication of such lands deemed ,appropriate by the: City Engineer in order to accomplish said, frontage improvements with the right,-of-way. Access to Lakeville Highway shall be limited to the; .Petroleum Avenue intersection except that a right turn in driveway access from 'Lakeville, :Highway may be developed into the site, subject to CalTrans approval. All 'truck deliveries to utilize Petroleum Avenue only 3 A- . �iglr�aay- �str� -et frontage= frrortr-src}e-} == serves- from -tire- - -sift= from; -- wiack rs=- +earerr- antk- -tire -- center- -o�--�Ehc- irdrlcevrlles -+hR lrwaq- ' etra cnrir= fiveiTue -Twise 4. for' sound wall construction, 7 d apprirral- of -staff . Contr"ibut 4. The proposed project, site plan, laiidscapin•g., building, elevations shall . be su_ bject to SPARE .approval in accordance with Section 26 -400 of the Zoning Ordinance. All conditions of; design approval shall become conditions of they Use Permit. No outdoor storage of materials n or equipments, other than ' items; displayed within the "Yardbirds nursery area. "' ahall be. permitted.. Na outdoor , display of materials offered for sale shall be allowed:- 6;. All :areas used for driveways, parking and, 'loadin'g shall be fully paved. The edge of all paving shall be curbed per SPA RC standard's T. All on and off -site drainage systems related to project shall be subject_ to review and approval of City Engineer and Sonoma County Water Agency where appropriate. 8. Location and design of Petroleum Avenue driveway shall be coordinated"; with preliminary development of U -Haul for continuity as to placement. and design, subject to .review and approval of City Engineer 9., Expansion or modification of production capacity, product linefservices or facility size shall require Use Permit revision. (.excluding. independent pad activity.).., 1Q.. The southerly driveway off of Petroleum, Avenue should be redesigned to accommodate the WB - -50 Design V61- cle�._ 11. Y ardb'irds and adjoining -lease. space shall be protected by' an .approved= automatic fire sprinkler System in a with Section 1Q.309A of the Uniform Fire Code:. r 12. Three fire hydrants! shall :be installed. Located as' marked on the site plan.. Hydrants shall have double 21 inch and single 41 inch outlet. Fire flow required is 2, 000 GPM from. two hydrants; at 20 PST residual ,pressure. 4 • 13.. There shall be no open storage of, equipment;, materials, trash,. litter - o r- packaging,., 15... _ _..16._ ere shall be .no inside 'or outside seating for the consumption. of ;food the premises at the convenience market mitigation measures related to' the finding -for a mitigated Negative Haration shall be incorporated herein, as conditions to the granting the Use Permit. u- - . de. f of.:the, proposed=:fast . food .restaurant - locafion shall_ ler to :incorporate the area into. the site plan,, subject to review and ?royal, 'of SPARG and staff`., 5 U 17. ,Developer shall execute a binding *agreement, with City 'to, run with land for; p.articipatdon in an, Aqsessmen_t District for Lakeville i Uii hway cprrid'or. improvements as -defined by­City., MISCELLANEOUS: Commissioner Hilliapss returned to the meeting., - IV.. ADMINISTRATIVE- APPEAL - . NIENDORP - 27 BELLY LANE. 1. ' Consideration of administrative appeal-. determination that e istm* xi conforming garage structure is subject to the rear setback requirements of a single family dwelling when - ed to -residence b y join b ; an addition. After a short discussion by the Commission, Commissioner Libarle ,made a motion. and Commissioner issioner Hilligoss� seconded . the motion, that Zdning Section .'25-401 should apply to 'this Addition. AYES:: 6 NOES,: G ABSENT: I (Head) Director SAImbns briefly spoke to the Commission -regarding use of the Consultant Fund in - the budget. He suggested- that portions of this 'budgeted money be used 'for the hiring of consultants to help- 4±,aft: �* g delines for the proposed Historic Preservation District :and help prepare bacikup information for the adult entertainment. legislation. (These two projects to : approximately proximately $800 $1,000',.) It was the dlohcens :of; the. - Commission to authorize staff to make the expenditure request to the City Manager, ADJOURNMENT: 1&:15 PM.. minutes,. INS W- - T& P- - pporrf8 A .6