Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 04/22/1986` 457 Not Official Until Approved By The Planning Commission MINUTES ( Minutes are "Action Minutes" and represent a summary of full taped records of Planning Commission hearings.) o i l' Petaluma Planning Commission Regular Meeting City Council Chambers April 22, 1986 7:30 p.m. Petaluma, California PRESENT: Commissioners Head, Hilligoss, Libarle, Read, Serpilio, Woolsey ABSENT: None STAFF: Warren Salmons, Planning Director Pamela Tuft, Principal Planner APPROVAL OF MINUTES Minutes of April 8, 1986 were approved as printed. CORRESPONDENCE A letter regarding Sonoma Highlands was received today and distributed at the opening of this meeting. DIRECTOR'S REPORT Director Salmons announced the May 10 Sonoma State University Environmental Review Seminar Commissioners Read, Head and H:illigoss indicated that they. intended to attend. COMMISSIONERS' REPORT: None. NOTE: Strike -Out Type ( - - - -) = Deletion Underline Type ( ) = Addition PUBLIC HEARINGS I. SONOMA HIGHLANDS, DAON CORPORATION, "D" STREET AND HAYES LANE, AP NO. 008- 032 -42, 008 - 049 -09 and 10, 019 - 012 -15 and 16 (Files 11.452A and 6.548A) (CONTINUED FROM FEBRUARY 11, 1986) . 1. Consideration of Draft Subsequent Environmental Impact Report and Response Addendum. 2. Consideration of rezoning to PUD. 3. Consideration of tentative map. 1 ar - , • Introduction by Planning Director Salmons on project history. The public hearing was continued from the February 11 meeting. SPEAKERS: Mr. Adams - EIP - explains addendum answers to questions regarding sewer, traffic, noise, status of Varn Hagan property. Steve Colman - DK_S Associates - answers questions regarding traffic alternatives. Cynthia Bowman, 625 D Street - Representing Petaluma Neighborhood Preservation - Requested a 2 -week continuation because of compromise meetings to be held with the developer. Gave brief history of project. Rose Eiserich - 931 B Street - Representing Petaluma Area Citizens League - Citizens League wants process to continue without delay; does not want a continuation. Mr. Colman - Applicant representative (VCE /Dann) - stated that he was interested in pursuing a possible compromise with opposing groups. Dennis Milliken - 501 Western Avenue - (Petaluma Area Citizens League) , Comments regarding the sewer section of the draft report; feels report is vague and inadequate; concerns re: No's 18 -24. Brian Webb - 1028 B Street - concerned that a two -week continuation would not be enough for public notice and input. Mary Thacker - 404 Sheldon - requested; a building moratorium because of existing flood damage and storm drainage problems. Pat Ferger - 411 Sunnyslope Avenue - Comments regarding DAON Corporation's credentials. Rose Eiserich - 931 B Street - Comments regarding cost revenue analysis, comments on ABAG. George Spragens - 2617 Western Avenue - concerns regarding status of the Varn -Hagen parcel, what will happen to existing use; traffic conditions not adequately addressed, who will own common areas; questions dealing with Victoria Avenue extension not adequately addressed. Robert Bailey - 915 D Street - attended some recent compromise meetings - does not feel compromise is possible, poor quality of development,_ traffic concerns, access roads. William Stone - 19 Hinman Street'- Sewer and storm drainage problems not adequately addressed in EIR.. Delores Lewis - 139 Hill. Blvd - Street widths inadequate, concerns regarding_ traffic problems, when were traffic counts done? Allison Priestly - 717 F Street - (speaking for 713, 714, 718 F Street also) concerns regarding traffic on residential streets, excessive use of residential roadways. Alfonso Richards - 200 H Street - Concerns with Petaluma Area Preservation group speaking for all involved. Fred Dean - Webster Street - Concerns regarding traffic and sewer problems, sewer problems preexisting. Ward Wilson - 22 El Rose Drive - Concerns regarding traffic on 2 HE residential streets, feels compromise should be worked out with developer, feels southwest area of City should be developed. Cynthia Bowman - 625 D Street - Feels she is speaking for 60 -80 households and that 80% are in favor of a compromise with developer. Rose Eiserich - 931 B Street - Wants development to be put on a public ballot. The public hearing was not closed. A motion was made by Commissioner Head and seconded by Commissioner Serpilio to continue further action on this item to a special Planning Commission meeting of May 6, 1986. AYES',: 6 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 II. VILLAGE MEADOWS, A 22 ACRE SITE LOCATED BETWEEN MARIA DRIVE AND ELY BOULEVARD NORTH, BORDERING THE NORTH BANK OF LYNCH CREEK, AP NO's 136- 111 -16, 20, 21, 43, 44 and 45. (Files 6.799, 3.357). 1. Consideration of EIQ. 2. Consideration of revision to previously approved PUD development plan. 3. Consideration of Tentative Map for an 81 -unit single - family home subdivision. The public hearing was opened. SPEAKERS: Mike Gallagher - Applicant - disagrees with PUD conditions 7 & 8. Commissioner Head commented that the storm drain empties into Lynch Creek. The public hearing was closed. A motion was made by Commissioner Hilligoss and seconded by Commissioner Woolsey to approve a negative declaration, subject to the findings listed in the staff report. AYES: 6 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 Findings For Negative Declaration 1. This project represents a reduction in the number of housing units on the site over the project previously found to have negative environmental impact at the same site and will therefore have a lesser environmental impact. 2. No significant environmental impacts were found in review of that previous more intense project. 3 MI .I A motion was made by Commissioner Hilligoss to recommend approval for the PUD plan for Village Meadows per the findings and conditions as listed in the staff report. This motion died for lack of a second. A motion was made by Commissioner Head and seconded by Commissioner Serpilio to recommend approval the the City Council for the PUD plan for Village Meadows subject to the findings and conditions listed in the staff report as amended. AYES: 5 NOES: 1 (Read) ABSENT: 0 Findings For PUD 1. The PUD District is proposed on property which has a suitable relationship to one (1) or more thoroughfares; and that said thoroughfares are adequate to carry any additional traffic generated by the development. 2. The plan for the proposed development presents a unified and organized. arrangement of buildings and service facilities which are appropriate in relation to adjacent or nearby properties and that adequate landscaping and /or screening is included in insure compatibility. 3. The natural and scenic qualities of the site are protected, with adequate available public and private spaces designated on the Unit Development Plan. 4. The development of the subject property, in the manner proposed by ,the applicant and conditioned by the City, will not be detrimental to the public welfare, will be in the best 'interests of the City and will be in keeping with the general intent and spirit of the zoning regulation of the City of Petaluma, with the Petaluma General Plan, and with any applicable Environmental Design Plans adopted by the City. Conditions for PUD: 1. Provision for transit turn -outs shall be made on the east side of Maria Drive and the west side of Ely Boulevard. A temporary bus turnout in the form of a paved shoulder shall be provided on the east side of Ely Boulevard within the right -of -way. These shall be designed to the approval of City staff prior to issuance of a final map. 2. All on -site public improvements shall be constructed to the satisfaction of the City staff. 3. The applicant's shall create a landscape maintenance assessment district to maintain all landscaping and irrigation installed within the public right -of -way of the project, including parkway street tree strips along public streets, entryway landscape areas, landscaped setback, unused area of right -of -way, and sound wall on Ely Boulevard, community open space along Lynch Creek, and the cul -de -sac landscape islands; subject to approval of appropriate City staff prior to final map approval. 4 e o®0 6 4. Entryways to the project from Ely Boulevard and Maria Drive shall be enhanced with appropriate features, such as a landscape island or landscape chokers or other gateway, design subject to staff approval. 5. Landscape islands, with or without provision of additional parking, shall be provided in the cul -de -sac bulbs of the project, design subject to staff approval. 6. Street sections shall be modified with the provision of a parkway strip for planting of street trees between sidewalks and curbs, design subject to staff approval. ?. ,A minimum- -Yrfwt -wide landscape setback area shall be provided between required sound wall and the .property line on Ely Boulevard, 'equivalent to that provided for Park Place IV 8. , Lots 35 through 41, between Flanigan Way and Lynch Creek shall be je}imivatecl end repositioned north of Flanigan Way with an increase of ;the area to be developed as a neighborhood open space for limited 'recreation and increased access and surveillance to Lynch Creek : subject to staff approval 9---- F} anrgan-- Wap-- nra- e-- socnewiirat-- atrarglitened -- between-- $rarzraef -mod czia- to- s}ig}r3q- redlxce- tris- c��en- spare- �re�rel- providz- tnorre -space far - privy 4ots -ter - tire - north of Flattig 19 - 9.{ The applicant shall offer for relocation, the existing house and the outbuildings located on the Elsie Corry life estate should they be ;slated for demolition. The bicycle path and any other improvements proposed by the ,Lynch Creek right -of -way shall all be completed at one time prior to 1 . issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for Phase II (including those in Phase III, the life estate) . 12-11, All existing trees which are to remain shall be protected during construction and grading. All existing trees which were slated to 'remain but are removed, destroyed or weakened so that death is a consequence of construction or grading shall be replaced by a specimen tree or trees to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development and Planning. 13 - 12. The following development standards shall apply to this subdivision: A. Home occupations are governed by applicable City Zoning Ordinance. B. All building additions and modifications are subject to SPARC approval. C. Minor building modifications - that is, greenhouse windows, new window sizes, security bars on windows, uncovered decks, spas, walkways, etc. may be approved by the Director of Community 5 Development and Planning pursuant to Zoning Ordinance Section 26 -401. All other standards for the project shall be as for the R -1, 6,500 district of the Petaluma Zoning Ordinance. }4.13. Any changes to the Village Meadows tentative map and /or `development plan made pursuant to these conditions or. SPARC conditions of approval shall be reflected on a new map and /or plan,. .a sepia print and one copy of which shall be provided to the Community Development and Planning Department within 30 working days after approval of such change. 15 -14. As suggested in the noise study and traffic report of the. previous subdivision on this site, a masonry wall on a berm shall be constructed along Ely Boulevard as previously approved for this site. 16. New architectural plans elevations shall be developed for this project with at least as much variation as the plans submitted herewith. The architecture shall be of rich design quality and shall. create a distinct architectural image for this neighborhood. Designs subject to SPARC approval. 17 -16. Houses shall be sited so as to preserve existing major trees so . much as possible, to staff approval. A motion was made by Commissioner Head. and seconded by Commissioner Serpilio to recommend to the City Council approval of the tentative map per the findings and conditions listed in the staff report as amended. AYES: 6 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 Findings for Tentative Map 1. The proposed subdivision, together with provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan. 2. The proposed subdivision is compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses, and programs specified in said General Plan. 3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. 4. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. 5. The tentative map provides reasonable public access from lying a public 'road the to that portion of the bank of the stream within proposed subdivision. 6. The tentative map provides for dedication of a public easement along lying within the proposed the portion of the bank of the stream subdivision. 1 6 :'t =_� 3 7. The proposed map, subject to the following conditions complies with the requirements of Municipal Code Chapter 20.16 and the Subdivision Map Act. Conditions for Tentative Map 1. Drainage design plans shall be shall conform with Sonoma County 2. Grading plans shall be submitted staff prior to issuance of building approved by the City Engineer and Water Agency design criteria. to and approved by appropriate City permits for such construction. 3. Public utility access and easement locations and I o approval by PG & E, Pacific Telephone, and shall be shown on the final map as necessary. widths shall be subject the City Engineer and 4. All utilities as required by Code, shall be placed underground. 5. All streets in the project shall be subject to approval by the Street Naming Committee. 6. The applicant shall provide an irrevocable offer of dedication to the City for the portion of Lynch Creek right -of -way between the bicycle path and the southeastern property line inclusive. 7- - -- r a prior --t- the- 44irrg-- cf-- -- firral -- map; -- the-- applica - shall- - provide - -a kydrer logic-- stratly -- cry-- i�gnzi�- -reek :---= Fke- -E'ritq-- s�raif- scot aecepfi `dedieatimr -of the-- l7yn -c r-€ reel- rrght- o€- waq- �mless tie - reh- �7reek basin- is ter - be- -lrrdranRc -ally- adegzra+t --tome-- satisfaetiorr - of - the Erity- Engineer - -and - Sorroma- Eotmtr -Water - Agency- .-- AirSr m moti --work or-- rmprovemerrt- yr�Y - to -- -ny&ke -- the - -creek -- basin- -hydrolegieaRy - adec�xate- �ra-1� be- eompietec�by- tire• �kearrt- to Frity Specifteations 8: -- i -eT oaf -of-- the-- existing�iparran- hsrbitat- shah- Trot- ��oweeh�s�r base , of - improvement but- rather- the- ideveloper -- 'hali eorrstrtrct; - rf - �; a -- pipe• - parallel - - i re- t�xiatirrg- stream- front - Ely -- on yard --to - Pel-aria Dxive -t} ram- wiH- �arrSr- a-- lzortiorr - of - the 44o%- - beyor - the- projj-eet --site representing -- the -- excess-- gnarrt�t- y- �€ rova{�eT� �lbvr begrnr�- the-- lrasie eapae. 7. 'The applicant shall diligently pursue, to the satisfaction of the `Director of Community Development and Planning, the acquisition and dedication to the City of the portions of a property containing the proposed bicycle path in the Lynch Creek right -of -way designated on the tentative map as the property of Keokuk Hospitals and should that .area be acquired prior to complete build -out of the project, the applicants shall provide landscaping, irrigation systems and a pathway as shown on the development plan. 8. The applicant shall satisfy City General Plan policies and programs with regard to providing housing, land in -lieu fees or alternate measures for housing affordable to very low, low and moderate income households. The means for satisfying this requirement shall be 7 = -'O0- 6 A developed in consultation with City staff and ratified by * the City Council concurrent with final map approval. 9. During the course of development, if archeological materials are found, all work in the vicinity of the find shall be stopped and a qualified archeologist contacted to evaluate the materials and make recommendations for mitigation as necessary. 10. The tentative map shall be revised to comply with the requirements of the City Engineer as outlined in . the attached correspondence. A payback agreement or other arrangement shall be executed for repayment to 'the developers for improvements in Ely Blvd. upon development of benefited neighboring properties, agreement subject to staff approval 11. The applicant is notified that the project site is in the Bernard Eldredge attendance area of the Old Adobe School District and is therefore subject to School Facility Fees which are presently $1,512.00 per unit. 12. The applicant is advised that the development may be subject to future charges for a public improvement benefit district pursuant to Chapter 13.34 of the Petaluma Municipal Code in order to provide needed future improvements to Rainier Avenue and /or the proposed Rainier Avenue overpass which will serve the project area. 13. This project shall be subject to payment of storm drainage impact fees. , ADJOURNMENT 10:45 PM. ATTEST: Warren Salmons Planning Director 8 0