HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 08/26/198631
Not Official Until Approved .
By The Planning Commission
MINUTES
(Minutes are "Action Minutes" and represent a summary
of full taped records of Planning Commission hearings.)
00 Petaluma Planning Commission August 26, 1986
® Iq Special Meeting 7:00 p.m.
City Council Chambers Petaluma, California
co PRESENT: Commissioners Davis, Hilligoss, Libarle,
Parkerson, Read, Tarr
ABSENT: Head
STAFF: Warren Salmons, Planning Director
Pamela Tuft, Principal Planner
Les Ruh, Assistant City Engineer
APPROVAL OF MINUTES None - Minutes of August 19 and 20 to be
reviewed at September 3, 1986 continued General Plan meeting.
CORRESPONDENCE None.
DIRECTOR'S REPORT None.
COMMISSIONERS' REPORT None.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
I. WRIGHT SUB - DIVISION, #1 OAKHILL PARK, AP NO. 006 - 181 -02, (FILE
No. 6.812.)
1. Consideration of EIQ.
2. Consideration of Tentative Map for 12 -lot R -1, 6,500 subdivision.
The public hearing was opened.
SPEAKERS:
Ed Wright (applicant) - 1 Oak Hill Park - described project history.
Frank McGrath - (Joe Ballestrini property) - Concerns regarding
maintenance of easement, water service, postal service and Laurel
Street access.
1
:.32
Dale White (engineer for project applicant) - 1620 Grant Avenue,
Novato - Explained subdivision and street layout. Concerns regarding
Conditions 2 and 5. °
Donna Cook - 521 Howard Street - questions regarding water easement
to her property is access will be obtained over easement.
Dale Steffey - 532 Howard Street - Concerns regarding traffic on
Howard Street; wants Oak Hill Park easement to remain, blind curve at
Ms. Andreason's property, number of houses.
Tom Sipes - 519 Howard Street - Concerns regarding new traffic on
Laurel, easement through Oak Hill Park should remain.
Sandra Benson - 519 Howard Street - Concerns regarding loss of
pasture areas, amount of houses, traffic, flooding in area.
Carl Camorar - 542 Laurel - Concerns regarding flooding and
drainage.
Dale White - Project Engineer - Described proposed drainage
improvements.
Renee Inert - 2 Cader Court - Concerns regarding drainage, storm
drains.
Anneliese Cooper - 620 Laurel Street - Concerns regarding drainage
and flooding.
A motion was made by Commissioner Parkerson and seconded by
Commissioner Davis to request further information regarding drainage and
possible partial park access and continue discussion of this project to the
Planning Commission meeting of September 23, 1986.
AYES: 6 (Davis, Hilligoss, Libarle, Parkerson, Tarr and Read)
ABSENT: 1 (Head)
II. EAST OF ELY SUBDIVISIONS (SPRINGMEADOW V, SHELTER HILLS
VILLAGE, VILLAGE EAST III) GARFIELD DRIVE, AP NO's 136- 060 -47,
48; 17- 060 -21, (Files 11.852, 3.338, 6.664, 6.662).
1. Consideration of Draft Subsequent Environmental Impact Report.
2. Consideration of rezonings to PUD (Springmeadow V and Shelter Hills
Village) .
3. Consideration of Tentative Maps (Springmeadow V and Shelter Hills
Village) .
The public hearing was opened.
2
RX
SPEAKERS:
Pat Sweeney - 5 Village East Court - Concerns regarding drainage,
traffic, pedestrian safety.
Steve Stranahan - 620 Appaloosa - Concerns regarding air traffic.
Richard Bannister - 2033 Caulfield - Concerns regarding increased
density when airport expands, traffic on Caulfield.
Joani Spear - 620 Garfield Drive - Concerns regarding density of new
00 homes, traffic on Garfield.
® Barbara Piper - 2012 Appaloosa Drive - Concerns regarding noise,
® traffic, EIR inadequacy, floding /drainage, lack of parks.
Wayne Schwartz - 600 Garfield Drive - Concerns regarding density,
traffic, urban separator, park areas.
Larry Medella - 620 Garfield - Concerns regarding noises, density,
more open space.
Mike Gallagher - McBail Bompany - Wants PG&E participation
Condition 18 eliminated, otherwise does not have problems with
conditions.
John Hemenway - 1933 St. Augustine Way - Concerns regarding
density, water pressure.
Dave Tricaso - Duffel Company - Concerns regarding decreased
density, feathering.
A motion was made by Commissioner Parkerson and seconded by
Commissioner Davis to continue discussion of this project at the Planning
Commission meeting of September 23, 1986.
AYES: 6 (Davis, Hilligoss, Libarle, Parkerson, Tarr and Read)
ABSENT: 1 (Head)
III. CITY OF PETALUMA ZONING ORDINANCE, MISCELLANEOUS TEXT
,AMENDMENTS (File 7.114) .
1. Consideration of miscellaneous text amendments.
It was the consensus of the Commission that discussion on this item be
continued to the meeting of August 27, 1986.
ADJOURNMENT 11:15 (To Special Meeting of 8/27/86).
•3
34
Not Official Until Approved
By The Planning Commission
MINUTES
(Minutes are "Action Minutes" and represent a summary
of full taped records of Planning Commission hearings.)
Petaluma Planning Commission August 27, 1986
Special Meeting 7:00 p.m.
City Council Chambers Petaluma, California
PRESENT: Commissioners Davis, Hilligoss, Libarle,
Parkerson, Read, Tarr
ABSENT: Head
STAFF: Warren Salmons, Planning Director
Pamela Tuft, Principal Planner
Kurt Yeiter, Associate Planner
APPROVAL OF MINUTES None.
CORRESPONDENCE None.
DIRECTOR'S REPORT None.
COMMISSIONERS' REPORT None.
NOTE: Strike -Out Type ( - - - -) = Deletion
Underline Type ( ) = Addition
PUBLIC HEARINGS
I. GAFFERY /RAY, 880 DICKSON HILL, AP NO. 006- 412 -25, (FILE No.
1.504.)
1. Consideration of use permit for accessory dwelling.
The public hearing was opened.
SPEAKERS:
Gene Pratt - 13 Cader Court - Concerns regarding utility easements,
drainage.
1
35
Jane Ray - 880 Dickson Hill Road - applicant - explained project.
The public hearing was closed.
A motion was made by Commissioner Libarle and seconded by Commissioner
Davis. to grant the use permit allowing a 520 square foot accessory dwelling
subject to the following findings and conditions:
AYES: 4 (Davis, Libarle, Parkerson, Tarr)
00 NOES: 2 (Hilligoss, Read - due to neighborhood opposition)
Iq ABSENT: 1 (Head)
® Findings
1. The proposed accessory dwelling meets the intent of the Petaluma
Zoning Ordinance, General Plan and EDP.
2. The proposed accessory dwelling will not constitute a nuisance or be
detrimental to the public welfare of the community.
Conditions
1. All construction shall match the design, colors, roof pitch, and
materials of the existing studio /hobby room and principal dwelling
subject to staff review.
2. Pertinent Flood Mitigation and Community Facilities fees shall be paid
prior to issuance of a building permit.
3. Independent utilities will be provided to the new unit to the
satisfaction of the Chief Building Inspector.
II. TWO -CANN CINEMAS, 2.19 SOUTH MCDOWELL, AP NO. 007 - 280 -71,
(FILE No. 1.503.)
1. Consideration of use permit to expand existing theater.
The public hearing was opened.
SPEAKERS :
William Foster - 259 Penngrove - applicant - described project and
:'answered questions.
The public hearing was closed.
A motion was made by Commissioner Tarr and seconded by Commissioner
Hilligoss to grant the use permit allowing a third auditorium, lobby
expansion, and facade remodel based on the following findings and
conditions.
2
36
AYES: 6 (Davis, Hilligoss, Libarle, Parkerson, Tarr, Read)
ABSENT: 1 (Head)
Findings:
1. The proposed use permit, as conditioned conforms with the intent of
the Zoning Ordinance.
2. The proposed use permit conforms with the goals, policies, and
programs of the General Plan/EDP.
3. The proposed expansion will not constitute a nuisance or be
detrimental to the public welfare of the community, but rather
contribute towards new vitality within a major commercial center.
4. Based on common experience and observation, Washington Square
Shopping Center contains adequate parking for the new use.
5. The proposed use will create customers who will overlap with other
retail/ restaurant uses, thereby creating less demand for automobile
parking spaces, which is not recognized by existing zoning ordinance
regulations.
6. Granting of this use permit will not constitute a special privilege not
enjoyed by other neighbors in the center.
7. Granting of this use permit will not be a detriment to adjacent
property, but rather contribute to the economic viability of the
existing shopping center.
rnn A i *i nn c .
1. The applicant shall obtain a variance of Zoning Ordinance Section
20 -300 "Number of Parking Spaces Required".
2. The new storefront shall match as much as possible that of the
existing theater.
3. Sign permits are required for any new outdoor advertising and /or
marquee signs. All new marquee signs must match existing to present
a uniform appearance.
4. Exterior modifications are subject to site plan and architectural review.
5. A separate entrance shall be provided for the video rental business
6. Staff will prepare a letter to notify the owner of the shopping center
of the City's desire to have more landscaping added to the shopping
center
III. MARY CARNAZOLA, 1024 MCNEAR (PHILLIPS AVENUE /CANYON
DRIVE) , AP NO. 008 - 423 -21, (FILE No. 6.821.)
3
3'7
1. .Appeal of administrative denial of Parcel Map.
® The public hearing was opened.
SPEAKERS:
Emil Mogel - applicant representative - described project.
'Frank Ford - 1334 Canyon Drive - expressed opposition to streets
, being tied together.
Jim Mason - 1313 Canyon Drive - expressed opposition to having roads
Iq ;connect.
Q
® The public hearing was closed.
co A motion was made by Commissioner Tarr and seconded by Commissioner
Davis, to recommend to Council provision for paved automobile and
emergency vehicle turnarounds at both Phillips Avenue and to recommend a
name' ,change for the Phillips Avenue segment off of Canyon Drive.
AYES- 6 (Davis, Hilligoss, Libarle, Parkerson, Tarr, Read)
ABSENT: 1 (Head)
1V. ROBERT WISE, 213 CINNABAR, AP NO. 019- 020 -20, (FILE No. 2.351.)
1. Consideration of variance for reduced rear building setback.
The public hearing was opened.
SPEAKERS:
John Taylor, Morton Technologies - applicant representative -
described addition.
Robert Wise - applicant - explained project.
Bill Bradford - 541 Eastman Lane - neighbor - stated that he may want
future variance also.
The public hearing was closed.
A motion was made by Commissioner Parkerson and seconded by
Commissioner Tarr to deny the requested variance to Section 13 -600 to allow
elimination of the required 10' rear setback, based on the following finding:
AYES: 6 (Davis, Hilligoss, Libarle, Parkerson, Tarr, Read)
ABSENT: 1 (Head)
Finding
4
ME
1. That the property exhibits no particular or specific hardship which is
inherent only to this parcel which restricts it from enjoying substantial
property rights possessed by other properties within the vicinity or in
the same zoning district; and that the granting of this variance would
constitute a grant of special privilege not enjoyed by surrounding
properties.
V. MCBAIL COMPANY, MEADOWPARK, AP NO. 137- 060 -33, (FILE No.
11.855, 6.822, 3.361).
1. Consideration of Mitigated Negative Declaration based on focused
environmental studies.
2. Consideration of Rezoning to PUD.
3. Consideration of Tentative Map.
The public hearing was opened.
SPEAKERS:
Mike Gallagher, McBail Company - applicant - objected to Condition
No. 12 - regarding only one access from Wood Sorrel Drive to North
McDowell Blvd.
David Young - 1526 Royal Oaks Drive - owner of Royal Oaks
Mobilehome Park, property adjacent to project - answered questions,
voiced concerns regarding resolution of drainage problems before new
development allowed, question regarding drainage assessment district.
Alice Preston - Principal of Waugh School - explained school
requirements for new bus, etc.
The public hearing was closed.
A motion was made by Commissioner Libarle and seconded by Commissioner
Davis to recommend to the City Council finding for a mitigated negative
declaration based on the following findings:
AYES: 6 (Davis, Hilligoss, Libarle, Parkerson, Tarr, Read)
ABSENT: 1 (Head)
Findings for Negative Declaration
1. This project represents a reduction of the number of housing units on
the site over the previously approved PCD which was found to have no
significant environmental impact on the same site.
2. Focused environmental studies have been undertaken for this proposal
on noise, traffic, drainage, school impacts, development policies,
urban design, and cost revenue. The proposed conditions of approval
5
Em
of the PUD and tentative map include conditions growing out of these
studies designed to mitigate negative impacts in all of these areas.
3. The project conforms with the applicable conditions of the General
Plan / EDP.
A motion was made by Commissioner Parkerson and seconded by
Commissioner Libarle to recommend to the City Council approval of the
proposed PUD rezoning subject to the following findings and conditions of
approval.
co AYES:: 6 (Davis, Hilligoss, Libarle, Parkerson, Tarr, Read)
N * ABSENT: 1 (Head)
O
® Findings For PUD
1. That said PUD plan clearly results in a more desirable use of land and
a better physical environment than would be possible under a single
zoning district or combination of zoning districts.
2. The PUD District is proposed on property which has a suitable
relationship to McDowell Blvd. North and Maria Drive and that said
thoroughfares are adequate to carry any additional traffic generated
by the development.
3. The plan for the proposed development presents a unified and
organized arrangement of buildings and service facilities which are
Appropriate in relation to adjacent or nearby properties as conditionally
approved and that adequate landscaping and /or screening will be
included in SPARC review to insure compatibility.
4. The natural and scenic qualities of the site are protected, with
I dequate available public and private spaces including a 3 -acre
neighborhood park designated on the Unit Development Plan.
5. The development of the subject property, in the manner proposed by
the applicant and conditioned by the City, will not be detrimental to
the public welfare, will be in the best interests of the City and will be
in keeping with the general intent and spirit of the zoning regulation
of the City of Petaluma, with the Petaluma General Plan, and with any
Applicable Environmental Design Plans adopted by the City.
Conditions for PUD
1. the proposed three -acre park shall be developed by the project
sponsors, subject to staff approval. The park shall be developed
before issuance of first Certificate of Occupancy for Phase II. The
plan shall include street frontage improvements, grading and basic
landscaping (turf, trees) .
2. The following development standards shall apply to this subdivision:
A. Home Occupations as governed by applicable City Zoning
Ordinance.
9
HM
. --- Hrnx —to- -ire- boil- -mr—lots -in -this- subdivision -required- ter - be-3-oiel
to -other -d a ve}ap e r s - s hail- ire- orb j e c- to- 7S-P-A R-G -ap provai
B. Single- family detached and attached homes shall be permitted the
following modifications:
1. Room additions (including covered patios) subject to the
setback requirements as stated in 15A.
2. Uncovered decks subject to the pertinent requirements
of the City Zoning Ordinance related to projections into
required yards.
3. Bay windows, greenhouse windows and other projects
subject to the requirements of the City Zoning
Ordinance as stated in F2, above.
C. Any exterior modifications shall be compatible in architectural
styling and exterior colors and materials to the existing structure
and subject to the approval of the City and the project
Architectural Control Committee.
D. Garage conversions are prohibited.
E. Accessory structures, including accessory dwellings if permitted
by project C.C. &R. s, are permitted subject to the regulations of
the Petaluma City Zoning Ordinance for accessory structures and
the provisions contained therein.
F. Any other questions concerning land use regulation in the project
shall be governed by the City Zoning Ordinance as long as it
does not expressly conflict with the project CC &R's or the
adopted PUD unit development plan.
G. Solar acc ess for active solar systems shall be maintained.
3. The master landscape plan and proposed architecture shall be reviewed
and approved by SPARC. SPARC shall pay particular attention to
landscaping_ as needed to reduce the interface problems with adjoining
residential areas. Landscaping in area of PG &E high voltage line along
Abercromby Street shall include trees as tall as PG &E will allow within
their easement,, to staff approval. SPARC shall also require a high
standard of landscaping for street trees, landscape islands, landscaped
street gateways, landscaping along the area in back of lots on Wood
Sorrel and the landscape design for the park site. Attention shall be
paid also to grading in these areas. No more than 18" grading
difference may be allowed from subdivision to subdivision.
4. Six foot fences shall be provided between lots and around the
perimeter of the. project as necessary to provide privacy and security,
design to SPARC approval. SPARC shall consider substituting
one -story for two -story units on lots abuting existing residential lots,
or otherwise mitigating potential loss of established privacy.
7
IM
5. The applicant shall provide for perpetual maintenance of all landscaped
areas not contained on private property to the satisfaction of the
Directors of Community Development and Parks and Recreation and
subject to final approval by the City Council. Perpetual maintenance
may be accommodated through a maintenance assessment district, the
formation of which must be ratified by the City Council prior to final
map approval.
1
6. Landscape islands shall be provided at the entry of Batchelder Way
from Yarberry Drive. Landscaped gateways shall be provided at the
co entrance of Yarberry Way from Wood Sorrel Drive and at the entrance
of Allegheny Court and Jaynes Drive from Yarberry Drive. Design
O subject to approval by City Engineer.
® 7. Street sections shall be modified as follows:
a. All cul -de -sac streets shall be reduced to 32 feet in width,
curb -to -curb, per Street Standards and the Municipal Code.
b. Abercromby Way shall be reduced to 28 feet curb -to -curb by
elimination of unneeded bikeways. Space saved shall be allocated
to area between Abercromby Way and the north fence of Royal
Oaks Mobile Home Park. This area shall be intensively
landscaped to provide a buffer to that project and to shield views
of the PG &E powerlines above.
8. All trees in the park strip between sidewalk and curb shall be
provided with approved root barriers.
9. All required landscaping in public areas shall be irrigated, design to
staff approval.
10. The six -acre office/ commercial project between Wood Sorrel Drive and
North McDowell Blvd. shall be part of a separate PUD from Meadow
Park's residential PUD hereby approved.
11. Provision for transit turn -outs shall be made on the east side of North
.McDowell Blvd. north of the intersection of the street connecting Wood
`Sorrel Drive to North McDowell Blvd. The length of the turn -out shall
be 120 feet and a width of 10 feet. Transit turn -outs shall be
P rovided on Maria Drive at the east end of the park site. The length
of the turn out shall be 90 feet and the width 10 feet.
12. Bicycle paths shall be provided along North McDowell Blvd. and Maria
Drive in the frontage of the project and connecting those streets along
; Yarberry Drive and through the office/ commercial area, design subject
to staff approval.
} 3--- iA-- �nrrtimum- of- �9$- �f- �.�re- reeiden4ta�- bets- in- t�- stzbrliv�isiorr- 5ha�1- be
sold- wick -no -more three- of- the- lets - --tare- b.xrill;- �otrt--by -an7- -single
b- aikler--- 3'he-- object- is --to -- - the - i�*_�t trrxf- �►- arittq --of- -the
prorect�el- providz- dots--' to- �oca��cnait- bnri�ders- or- owrrer- �uiicfiers
ebleetive- -wile- i7e-7rrgen eral-,- �o--sc��stter -them tfrrrnxgheut- the- pro7ea:t•.
U
Am
15. Any changes to the Meadow Park tentative map and /or development
plan made pursuant to these conditions or SPARC conditions of
approval shall be reflected on a new map and /or plan (sepia print and
one copy) which shall be provided to the Community Development and
Planning Department within 30 working days after approval of such
change.
16. No more than 20% of the total number of units may be changed
throughout the entire project without need of a reevaluation under the
Residential Development Control System. All such modifications require
prior approval of the Director of Community Development. The
Director shall not grant such approval if it is found to have a
significant detrimental effect on the housing mix or visual
repetitiveness of the immediate neighborhood.
16. Hours of construction activity on the Springmeadow V project shall be
limited to the hours of 7 AM to 6 PM, Monday through Friday
(non - holiday) .
A motion was made by Commissioner Parkerson and seconded by
Commissioner Libarle to recommend to the City Council approval of the
Tentative Map for the 177 unit single - family residential project known as
Meadow Park, subject to the following findings and conditions of approval.
AYES: 6 (Davis, Hilligoss, Libarle, Parkerson, Tarr, Read)
ABSENT: 1 (Head)
Findings for Tentative Map
1. The proposed subdivision, together with provisions for its design and
improvement, is consistent with the General Plan.
2. The. proposed subdivision is compatible with the objectives, policies,
general land uses, and programs specified in said General Plan.
3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed.
4. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of
development.
5. The proposed map, subject to the following conditions complies with
the requirements of Municipal Code Chapter 20.16 and the Subdivision
Map Act.
6. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements therefor
will not cause substantial environmental damage, and no substantial or
avoidable injury will occur to fish or wildlife or their habitat.
7. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not
cause serious public health problems.
IM
8. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements proposed
will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for
access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision.
9. The discharge of waste from the proposed subdivision into the existing
community sewer system will not result in violation of the existing
requirements prescribed by the Regional Water Quality Control Board.
Conditions for Tentative Map
1. Drainage design plan shall be approved by the City Engineer and shall
conform with Sonoma County Water Agency Design Criteria.
® 2. Public utility access and easement locations shall be subject to approval
® by PG &E, Pacific Telephone and the City Engineer and shall be shown
m on the final map as necessary.
3. All existing and proposed utilities, as required by Code, shall be
placed underground.
4. All streets in the project shall be subject to approval by the Street
Naming Committee.
5. The project sponsor shall be required to pay low and moderate income
housing in -lieu fees *of an amount to be determined according to the
schedule established by City Council Resolution No. 84 -199 N.C.S. , or
make alternative arrangements to meet the low and moderate income
!housing provision requirements of the Housing Element subject to
approval of the City and prior to approval of the Final Map.
6. During the course of development, if archealogical materials are found,
all work in the vicinity of the find will be stopped and a qualified
archealogist contacted to evaluate the material and make
recommendations for mitigation as necessary.
7. 'the developer shall comply with all conditions of the City Engineer as
set out in the attached letter as follows:
A. Approval of the final map shall be denied until such time as a
mechanism has been developed and implemented for the widening
of McDowell Boulevard to four lanes with appropriate left turn
lanes from Dynamic Street to Corona Road including all storm
drain improvements necessary. Said mechanism shall be deemed
implemented by the conclusion of a protest hearing for the
formation of an Assessment District.
The applicant shall provide funding for preliminary work for the
organization of an Assessment District as determined by the City
Engineer. Said funds shall be reimbursable from the Assessment
District if it is formed.
B. This subdivision shall be contingent upon the storm drainage
improvements to be constructed with the proposed parcel map for
the Land of Charles Stephens and Pine Creek Properties (A.P.
10
AM
PAPA
No. 048 - 080 -06) and proposed South Point Industrial Park
Subdivision.
All said projects shall be approved and constructed concurrently.
If this is not possible, it will be the responsibility of the Meadow
Park developers to construct the drainage improvements as
required by Sonoma County Water Agency Master Drainage Plan
and the city Engineer.
C. The intersection of "Warrick Drive" with North McDowell shall be
coordinated and line up with the new street intersection from the
proposed Pine Creek Properties Parcel Map ( South Point
Boulevard) subject to City Engineer approval.
D. A one -foot non - access easement shall be dedicated along North
McDowell Boulevard across the frontage of Lots A and B.
E. The developer shall comply with the amended Petaluma Municipal
Code Sections 20.36.010 and 20.36.020 which require the
developer to pay storm drainage impact fees (as calculated in
Chapter 17.30).
F. Regarding Corona Road and North McDowell Boulevard, the
developer shall, prior to approval of the final map, contribute a
pro -rate share based upon the ratio - Project % of traffic
generated by complete build -out of the development . total
estimated traffic signal warrant volume. The actual numbers to
be used generated from a traffic study for this development.
The method of agreement shall be determined by the City
Engineer.
G. Regarding North McDowell Boulevard and Warrick Drive, the
developer shall build the signal, in conjunction with the
developers of the proposed Pine Creek Properties Parcel
Map/South Point Industrial Subdivision, the first party to develop
being reimbursed half of cost upon development of other project.
H. The developer shall be aware that the current Rainier Avenue
Interchange and Extension Study, currently underway, may result
in the formation of .a Benefit Assessment District. The developer
shall agree to participate in such a district.
I. All publicly owned and maintained sanitary sewer and water mains
located in private property shall be contained in an exclusive ten
foot paved, dedicated easement.
J. Full street improvements are required for Abercrombie Way and
shall be located entirely within the boundard of Meadow Park
Subdivision.
K. Cul -de -sacs shall not be designed with one hundred year relief
swales over private property.
11
Im
!L. Maria Drive street improvements shall continue across the City
well site.
M. Permission of owners will be required for all grading on adjacent
property.
, N. Signing and striping shall be in conformance with the City of
Petaluma and Cal Trans standards.
O. A left turn pocket shall be provided on North McDowell Boulevard
0
to serve
Warrick Drive.
Iq
®
P.. Phase 1
through
of this development shall
the Muelrath property and
construct
connect to
Wood Sorrel Drive
that portion of the
Q
roadway
constructed with McDowell
Meadows.
Funds previously
collected
shall be utilized for this purpose per
McDowell Meadows
tentative
map conditions, Resolution
84 - 91, No.
9 as follows:
The project sponsor (owners) shall be responsible for
one -half the cost of the proposed frontage road across the
Land of Muelrath (A.P. No. 137 - 060 -54). The owners shall
either construct their portion of the road (approximately 105
feet to appropriate City standards) with the development of
the first phase of the subdivision, or shall agree to deposit
an amount of money to be determined by the City Engineer,
prior to approval of the final map, that will be used to
construct the road at the time the Friedman (A.P. No.
127 - 060 -33) property develops.
Q. The typical half- street section for Maria Drive should depict a
thirty foot half street right -of -way with a twenty -four foot curb
to centerline with a five foot sidewalk. This development shall
also provide an additional ten foot street dedication with
appropriate structural street section along Maria Drive adjacent to
the northerly side of the centerline.
R'. Extension of Maria Drive (through the Perry property) to its
connection at Sunrise Subdivision shall be completed in
conjunction with Phase II.
8. The applicant is notified that the project area site is in the Waugh
School attendance area and is thereby subject to School Facilities Fees.
�A are- prreseirrlp --$1; 599-98- -jeer - unit.- The developers shall also
con+ rib -ute- a- # air- share - sect-on - percent- vf-- demarr&r-toward purchase
of a required school bus for and subject to approval of the Waugh
School Dis trict. ag re±*a*Y*_ - o- rpm�ra�- c�ff�it�r�taff.
9. Access to lot 54 through City pump station land must be purchased
from the City if available, or the lot shall be combined with lots 52
and 53.
10. Only one street shall be allowed in the frontage of this property
between Wood Sorrel Drive and North McDowell Blvd. That street
12
HM
shall be aligned to create a four. -way intersection with previously
approved street from South Point Industrial Park across North
McDowell Blvd.
11. Fire hydrants shall be spaced as required by the City Fire Marshal.
It is recommended that the Council consider a reimbursement agreement as
was suggested for the last Park Place Subdivision for Ely Boulevard, i.e.
property . owners for which the improvements were constructed across
adjacent property would reimburse Meadow Park property for the cost of
the street widening when the land develops.
VI. CITY OF PETALUMA ZONING ORDINANCE, MISCELLANEOUS TEXT
AMENDMENTS (File 7.114) .
1. Consideration of miscellaneous text amendments.
Continued from 8/26/86.
The public hearing was opened.
A motion was made by Commissioner Tarr and seconded by Commissioner
Parkerson to recommend that the City Council approve the zoning text
amendments as follows:
AYES: 6 (Davis, Hilligoss, Libarle, Parkerson, Tarr, Read)
ABSENT: 1 (Head)
1. Historic District (Article 17) . Remove references of "residential" from
Zoning Ordinance Section 17- 401.2.
2. Minor - Major Auto Repair Definitions ( Section 1 -203) Clarify these
definitions to make repairs involving the removal or exterior overhaul
of major automobile parts (e.g. body, engine, transmission) a part of
"Major Automobile Repair".
A motion was made by Commissioner Tarr and seconded by Commissioner
Parkerson to continue the public hearing until September 9, 1986 for the
following miscellaneous zoning text amendments:
AYES: 6 (Davis, Hilligoss, Libarle, Parkerson, Tarr, Read)
ABSENT: 1 (Head)
1. Auto Storage, Towing Yard, Junkyard, Etc. Adopt definitions for
these automobile- related activities and make these activities conditional
uses in the C -H, M -L, and M -G zoning districts.
2. Minor Conditional Uses (Section 26 -500) . Amend to introduce the
concept of minor use permits and to formulate procedures for their
administrative (staff level) approval.
13
ri
4'7
1
3. Amend Article 20 (Parking and Loading Facilities Off.- Street) to
include existing policies regarding placement of parking lots, setbacks,
and' .exclusion of parking lots from front yard setbacks.
4. Clarify wording for sign amortization procedures.
5. Amend sign regulations to reflect existing policies prohibiting
non= monument style free - standing signs along East Washington Street.
6. Amend maximum time limits and purposes of zoning permits.
Co
7. Height limitations on light standards.
0 8. Minimum acreage requirement for P -C -D zone.
0
Co 9. Definition for "quasi-public".
10. Exception on extension of building along rear property line.
11. Possible reduction in lot size square footage requirements for service
bays at service stations.
12. Procedure on review- of changes in Historic designated. properties.
ADJOURNMENT (To - special meeting of September 1, 1986) .
i
k
1
14